The Anxiety of Selling. Value Investors select stocks that are least likely ever to trigger the criteria for selling.

1.  A vexing question facing investors during market sell-offs is whether to join the pack.

2.  For value investors, the answer is no, but the more pertinent question is when to sell.

3.  Value investors set selling criteria at the time of purchase.

4.  Their attitude in buying is to select stocks that are least likely ever to trigger the criteria for selling.

5.  But businesses change, and when they deteriorate, their shares should be sold, just as the owner of a business sometimes must decide to close down.

6.  When selecting stocks, value investors specify what deterioration means for purposes of selling.

7.  The logic is simple:  The same factors used to select and avoid stocks are used to decide which stocks to sell and when. #

8.  Value investors avoid selling when bad news is temporary.

9.  Single quarter profit margin slippage should provoke questions, but not sales orders.

10.  If investigation shows deeper problems, then the condition might be permanent and selling indicated.

11.  Permanent deterioration requires more evidence.

12.  When in doubt concerning whether the deterioration is temporary or permanent, value investing might include a hedging strategy.

13.  This would call for selling some but less than all shares held.

14.  Value investors never sell solely due to falling prices.

15.  They require some evidence related to the declining intrinsic value of the business to warrant a revision in the hold-or-sell calculus.

16.  Stock price fluctuations are far too ficle to influence such an important decision.

17.  In the case of a preset policy to sell when price reaches a certain high level, many value investors follow the same mixed strategy adhered to when unsure whether a development is permanent or temporary:  selling some, but not all.


# Sales are indicated when the key factors supporting an original buy are gone.  Here is a summary of such factors:

Internal:

• dubious management behaviour,
• vague disclosure or complex accounting,
• aggressively increased merger activity,
• dizzying executive compensation packages.

External:

• intensifying new competition,
• disruptive technological onslaughts,
• deregulation,
• declining inventory and receivables turns.

Economic:

• shrunken profit margins,
• declining returns on equity, assets, and investments,
• earnings erosion,
• debt increased aggressively in relation to equity,
• deterioration in current and quick ratios.