1. A typical investor who spreads his or her money over a basket of stocks can expect to achieve 10 to 12 percent annualized gains over great periods.
2. The same investor who focuses on the types of stocks Buffett owns - Coca-Cola, Gillette, Capital Cities, Wells Fargo, etc. - could expect to gain perhaps a few percentage points more each year. These stocks have shown a tendency to outperform the market over long periods because they exhibited growth rates greater than the average US corporation.
3. A shrewd, full time investor who focussed on Buffett-like stocks and made sure to buy them at wonderfully cheap prices could add a couple of extra percentage points of gain a year.
But the combined effects of these strategies still don't come close to producing the 33 percent compounded annual gain Buffett attained between the mid-1950s and the late 1990s.
Peter Lynch's managed the Magellan Fund. He bought and sold common stocks like the rest of us, including many of the same types of stocks you probably placed in your own portfolio.
Why, then, did Lynch and Buffett attain vastly superior results? There's got to be more to the story.
We tend to overlook the fact that the success of investors such as Lynch and Buffett derived from thousands of critical decisions they made over the course of decades, many of which were made on the fly; but the majority of which were correct.
In our quest to find shortcut answers to how they did it, we tend to look at only the beginning - that Buffett started with $100 - and at the end - his $30 billion fortune and dismiss the daily rituals that got him from point A to point B. Those rituals, however, are what pushed Buffett's returns well above those of the crowd.
"If everybody had seen what he had seen, he wouldn't have made huge gains from his visions," Forbes magazine once wrote.
No comments:
Post a Comment