Sunday 18 November 2012

50 Unfortunate Truths About Investing


Sorry, but ... 
1. Saying "I'll be greedy when others are fearful" is much easier than actually doing it.
2. The gulf between a great company and a great investment can be extraordinary.
3. Markets go through at least one big pullback every year, and one massive one every decade. Get used to it. It's just what they do.
4. There is virtually no accountability in the financial pundit arena. People who have been wrong about everything for years still draw crowds.
5. As Erik Falkenstein says: "In expert tennis, 80% of the points are won, while in amateur tennis, 80% are lost. The same is true for wrestling, chess, and investing: Beginners should focus on avoiding mistakes, experts on making great moves."
6. There are tens of thousands of professional money managers. Statistically, a handful of them have been successful by pure chance. Which ones? I don't know, but I bet a few are famous.
7. On that note, some investors who we call "legendary" have barely, if at all, beaten an index fund over their careers. On Wall Street, big wealth isn't indicative of big returns. 
8. During recessions, elections, and Federal Reserve policy meetings, people become unshakably certain about things they know nothing about.
9. The more comfortable an investment feels, the more likely you are to be slaughtered.
10. Time-saving tip: Instead of trading penny stocks, just light your money on fire. Same for leveraged ETFs.
11. Not a single person in the world knows what the market will do in the short run. End of story.
12. The analyst who talks about his mistakes is the guy you want to listen to. Avoid the guy who doesn't -- his are much bigger.
13. You don't understand a big bank's balance sheet. The people running the place and their accountants don't, either.
14. There will be seven to 10 recessions over the next 50 years. Don't act surprised when they come.
15. Thirty years ago, there was one hour of market TV per day. Today there's upwards of 18 hours. What changed isn't the volume of news, but the volume of drivel. 
16. Warren Buffett's best returns were achieved when markets were much less competitive. It's doubtful anyone will ever match his 50-year record.
17. Most of what is taught about investing in school is theoretical nonsense. There are very few rich professors.
18. The more someone is on TV, the less likely his or her predictions are to come true. (U.C. Berkeley psychologist Phil Tetlock has data on this).
19. Related: Trust no one who is on CNBC more than twice a week.
20. The market doesn't care how much you paid for a stock. Or your house. Or what you think is a "fair" price.
21. The majority of market news is not only useless, but also harmful to your financial health.
22. Professional investors have better information and faster computers than you do. You will never beat them short-term trading. Don't even try. 
23. How much experience a money manager has doesn't tell you much. You can underperform the market for an entire career. And many have.
24. The decline of trading costs is one of the worst things to happen to investors, as it made frequent trading possible. High transaction costs used to cause people to think hard before they acted.
25. Professional investing is one of the hardest careers to succeed at, but it has lowbarriers to entry and requires no credentials. That creates legions of "experts" who have no idea what they are doing. People forget this because it doesn't apply to many other fields.
26. Most IPOs will burn you. People with more information than you have want to sell. Think about that.
27. When someone mentions charts, moving averages, head-and-shoulders patterns, or resistance levels, walk away.
28. The phrase "double-dip recession" was mentioned 10.8 million times in 2010 and 2011, according to Google. It never came. There were virtually no mentions of "financial collapse" in 2006 and 2007. It did come.
29. The real interest rate on 20-year Treasuries is negative, and investors are plowing money into them. Fear can be a much stronger force than arithmetic.
30. The book Where Are the Customers' Yachts? was written in 1940, and most still haven't figured out that financial advisors don't have their best interest at heart.
31. The low-cost index fund is one of the most useful financial inventions in history. Boring but beautiful. 
32. The best investors in the world have more of an edge in psychology than in finance.
33. What markets do day to day is overwhelmingly driven by random chance. Ascribing explanations to short-term moves is like trying to explain lottery numbers.
34. For most, finding ways to save more money is more important than finding great investments.
35. If you have credit card debt and are thinking about investing in anything, stop. You will never beat 30% annual interest. 
36. A large portion of share buybacks are just offsetting shares issued to management as compensation. Managers still tout the buybacks as "returning money to shareholders."
37. The odds that at least one well-known company is insolvent and hiding behind fraudulent accounting are high.
38. Twenty years from now the S&P 500 (INDEX: ^GSPC  ) will look nothing like it does today. Companies die and new ones emerge.
39. Twelve years ago General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) was on top of the world and Apple(Nasdaq: AAPL  ) was laughed at. A similar shift will occur over the next decade, but no one knows to what companies.
40. Most would be better off if they stopped obsessing about Congress, the Federal Reserve, and the president and focused on their own financial mismanagement. 
41. For many, a house is a large liability masquerading as a safe asset.
42. The president has much less influence over the economy than people think.
43. However much money you think you'll need for retirement, double it. Now you're closer to reality.
44. The next recession is never like the last one. 
45. Remember what Buffett says about progress: "First come the innovators, then come the imitators, then come the idiots."
46. And what Mark Twain says about truth: "A lie can travel halfway around the world while truth is putting on its shoes."
47. And what Marty Whitman says about information: "Rarely do more than three or four variables really count. Everything else is noise."
48. The bigger a merger is, the higher the odds it will be a flop. CEOs love empire-building by overpaying for companies.
49. Investments that offer little upside and big downside outnumber those with the opposite characteristics at least 10-to-1.
50. The most boring companies -- toothpaste, food, bolts -- can make some of the bestlong-term investments. The most innovative, some of the worst.

50 Unfortunate Truths About Investing
By Morgan Housel
November 14, 2012
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/11/14/50-unfortunate-truths-about-investing.aspx

Saturday 17 November 2012

Hong Leong Bank - Padding in ahead in 1QFY13 HOLD


FRIDAY, 16 NOVEMBER 2012

-  We are maintaining our HOLD rating on Hong Leong Bank Bhd (HLBB), with a marginal change in fair value to RM15.80/share (from RM15.90/share previously).  Our fair value is based on an ROE of 15.4% FY13F and an unchanged fair P/BV of 2.2x. 

-  HLBB managed to beat expectations in 1QFY13 with annualised net earnings coming in at 2.2% above our forecast, and 1.9% above consensus net earnings of RM1,873mil.

-  HLBB has now adopted the Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards (FRS 139) for the first time with effect from this financial quarter. There was a write-back in the collective assessment amount by RM380mil (our forecast: RM450mil) or RM0.20/share, with an adjustment in the collective assessment rate (as a percentage of gross loans less individual assessment allowance carried forward) (CA rate) to 1.6% from 2.1%. This is in line with our forecast of 1.6%.

-  Annualised loans growth was at 5.4%, lower than the company’s target loans growth of 10% to 12% for FY13F. This came mainly from a softer working capital segment, attributed to a reduction in utilisation of trade finance facilities in line with the generally weaker macro exports trend. NIM did better than expected with a 5bps improvement QoQ, in contrast to wide expectations of ongoing reduction in NIM. We believe NIM improvement came from higher LDR utilisation as well as deposit management. Non-interest income posted a strong growth of 23.7% QoQ in 1QFY13, mainly from treasury gains. 

-  Gross impaired loans declined by 3.3% QoQ in 1QFY13. Gross impaired loans ratio was at 1.6% as at end-1QFY13, compared with 1.7% in 4QFY12. 

-  Loan loss cover remains high, despite the write-back in the collective assessment balance carried forward, at 134.3% in 1QFY13. This compares to 4QFY12’s 158.2% before FRS139 adjustment, and the restated 133.4% for 4QFY12 post FRS139. There were loan loss provision write-backs totalling RM14.7mil in 1QFY13, mainly from continuing good recoveries. 

-  HLBB’s 1QFY13 surprised in terms of much better-than expected loan loss provisions, signalling that its asset quality remains strong. However, topline growth has slowed down perceptibly in 1QFY13, although this is probably a reflection of industry trend. 

-  We expect HLBB’s share price to be sustained on further evidence of:- (a) stronger-than-expected topline loan growth; (b) evidence of revenue synergy for its fee-based income from its expanded customer base; and (c) continued improvement in asset quality.  

Source: AmeSecurities

Hartalega leads healthcare on revisions

 Publish date: Fri, 16 Nov 17:43 
Hartalega Holdings Bhd leads on analyst revisions among eight companies in Malaysia's healthcare sector tracked by at least three analysts, data from Thomson Reuters StarMine shows.

The glove manufacturer has an Analyst Revision Model (ARM) score of 98, the highest in the sector. This score has increased 40 points over the past 30 days.

It has high Smartholdings and Earnings Quality scores of 94 and 80 respectively. The former suggests a potential increase in institutional ownership while the latter implies good earnings sustainability over the next 12 months.

Hartalega's forward 12-month EV/EBITDA and P/CF ratios beat industry averages by 2 per cent and 9 per cent respectively. Its quarterly net income grew 28 per cent to RM59 million between September 2011 and 2012 while its quarterly free cash flow rose 27 per cent to RM42 million during the same period.

Seven of 13 analysts tracking the stock have raised EPS estimates on the firm for 2013 by an average of 3.3 per cent since Nov. 7. Eight of the 13 have also increased EPS estimates for 2014 by an average of 5.1 per cent during the same period.

Of the 12 analysts rating the stock, seven give it a "strong buy" or "buy", four have a "hold", while one recommends a "sell" rating.

Hartalega currently trades at an all-time high of RM5, around 86 per cent of its intrinsic value of RM5.79. The stock price has risen nearly 80 per cent over the past 12 months, while the broader index gained over 10 per cent during the same period, as of Thursday's close.

On the other end of the spectrum, Adventa Bhd lags the sector with an ARM score of 22. - Reuters

http://www.btimes.com.my/articles/20121116174302/Article/

Friday 16 November 2012

The Verdict on Market Timing

Over a fifty-four year period, the market has risen in thirty-six years, been even in three years, and declined in only fifteen.

  • Thus, the odds of being successful when you are in cash rather than stocks are almost three to one against you.  
  • An academic study by Professors Richard Woodward and Jess Chua of the University of Calgary shows that holding on to your stocks as long-term investments works better than market timing because your gains from being in stocks during bull markets far outweigh the losses in bear markets.  
  • The professors conclude that a market timer would have to make correct decisions 70 percent of the time to outperform a buy and hold investor. I have never met anyone who can bat 0.700 in calling market turns.



The words of John Bogle, founder of the Vanguard Group of Investment Companies on the subject of market timing.

Bogle said,
"In 30 years in this business, I do not know anybody who has done it successfully and consistently, nor anybody who knows anybody who has done it successfully and consistently.  Indeed, my impression is that trying to do market timing is likely, not only not to add value to your investment program, but to be counterproductive."

HDBSVR maintains Buy on HL Bank, TP RM17


Friday November 16, 2012 MYT 8:46:00 AM


KUALA LUMPUR: Hwang DBS Vickers Research (HDSBVR) is maintaining a Buy on Hong Leong Bank and a target price of RM17.
“This is based on the Gordon Growth Model (16% ROE, 5% growth and 10% cost of equity) and implies 2.3 times CY13 book value,” it said on Friday.
HDBSVR said HL Bank remains one of its top Buys despite share price already rising by 33% year-to-date.
It believes there is still value in extracting synergies from the rejuvenated business banking platform post merger with EON Cap.
HDBSVR said the bank's net interest income was weaker on-quarter as net interest income fell, albeit less than in the previous two quarters.
“Loan and deposit growth were subdued, with loans expanding only 1.3% q-o-q (led by mortgage) while deposits inched up 0.3%. Loan-to-deposit ratio at 73% is still the lowest among peers. Non-interest income was boosted by trading income from treasury operations.
“Excluding one-off items (EON Cap merger) in 4QFY12, expenses and cost-to-income ratio (44%) were stable in 1QFY13. Operating profit was lifted by lower collective allowance (CA) charge following the adoption of MFRS139, coupled with loan recoveries,” it said.
HDBSVR said excluding one-off adjustments for MFRS139, provisions were a mere RM4mil. Share of profit from Bank of Chengdu was 10% of pretax profit, within its expectation. Capital remains strong with Tier-1 and RWCAR (bank level) at 11.7% and 14.0%, respectively.
“We believe it is a good strategy to keep balance sheet liquid in a competitive operating environment but this may cause NIM to remain under pressure as excess liquidity which is typically placed in the interbank market carries lower yields. We are retaining our loan and deposit growth assumptions of 11% and 9%, which implies 73% loan-to-deposit ratio,” said the research house.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/11/16/business/20121116084608&sec=business

Guan Chong Q3 earnings up 5.6% to RM27.4m, dividend 2 sen


Published: Friday November 16, 2012 MYT 1:54:00 PM

KUALA LUMPUR: Cocoa processor Guan Chong Bhd's earnings rose 5.6% to RM27.41mil in the third quarter ended Sept 30, 2012 from RM25.94mil a year ago, supported by a 5.9% increase in sales volume and improved profit margin.
It said on Friday the higher profit was achieved in spite of a 4.7% decline in revenue to RM348.47mil from RM365.72mil a year ago due to lower average selling prices of cocoa ingredients and the drop in cocoa bean prices.
Earnings per share were 5.76 sen compared with 5.44 sen. Its dividend was 2.0 sen compared with 4.0 sen a year ago.
Its managing director and CEO Brandon Tay Hoe Lian said the better earnings were despite the challenging markets in the US and Europe, and volatile prices for raw materials.
"GCB was able to weather the storm as we continued to find new markets and maintained an efficient cost structure for our plants in Pasir Gudang and Batam," he said.
On the 2.0 sen dividend, the company said it had paid 9.0 sen per share so far in FY12, or RM31.8mil, which was in line with its dividend policy of paying 25% of net profit to shareholders.
Guan Chong's nine-months earnings increased by 3.9% to RM94.02mil from RM90.47mil in the previous corresponding period. Revenue rose 2.5% to RM1.015bil from RM990.36mil.

Saturday 10 November 2012

iCAP closed end fund: 87% of shareholders voted for the status quo


 Saturday November 10, 2012 MYT 5:22:15 PM

Trio fail to get elected to iCapital.biz

By John Loh


KUALA LUMPUR: Andrew Pegge, Low Nyap Heng and a shareholder Lo Kok Kee failed to get elected to the board of iCapital.biz Bhd at its packed AGM on Saturday.
At the six-hour meeting, which started at 9am, shareholders overwhelmingly threw their support behind its fund manager andfounder Tan Teng Boo.
Some 87% of shareholders voted against the resolutions seeking board representations for Pegge, Low and Lo on Malaysia's only listed closed-end fund.
Earlier, Kingsnorth told journalists outside the AGM at a hotel here that Laxey, which owns 6.9% of iCapital.biz, had accomplished what it set out to do.
"The debate (about the discount between iCapital.biz's share price and net asset value) is good. The company is better for this.
"We are still the largest shareholder and will continue to express our views," he said.

Tan Teng Boo's interview on bfm on the latest development in iCAP

http://www.bfm.my/assets/files/MarketWatch/2012_11_09_MW_TanTengBoo.mp3


To fellow Shareholders of iCAP
Let us keep to the initial objectives of this fund.
Please cast your votes to send a decisive message in this AGM.
HandshakeHandshake

I throw my support for Tan Teng Boo to maintain the status quo in iCAP.



Also read:


Thursday 8 November 2012

iCAP closed end fund manager responds to Laxey Partners accusations

http://icapital.biz/agm/FORMAL_RESPONSE_TO_LAXEY_PARTNERS_LTD_ACCUSATIONS.pdf


My comments:

Actually, those who are disgusted with ttb or iCAP can choose to sell their shares.  I think this happened all the time.  Those who favoured ttb or iCAP may be the buyers of these shares.  I think this happened all the time.

The issue facing iCAP shareholders this Saturday is quite different.  Laxey Partner has amassed a sizeable stake in iCAP.  As a shareholder, they rightfully can request for changes.  However, their motives may not be fully aligned to many long term shareholders of iCAP.

They are invited to state their case.  How can they hope to reduce the market price - NAV gap?  I thought this was a stupid thing really.   This gap exists because of various factors.  They should propose how they hope to reduce this gap without liquidating this fund.  

Share buyback?  Will this work?  Doubtful ... 
Dividends?  Why?  I would rather have my funds retained in iCAP to compound at a high rate of return.

As I have written earlier, ttb and his board of directors (hopefully they will be retained at this AGM) should stay focus on the performance of the NAV of this fund rather than wasting any time worrying over the market price - NAV gap of iCAP which I feel they have little or no control over.

If Laxey Partner wishes to pay a price closer to the NAV price, this gap would have narrowed.  On the other hand, it was also this discount that allowed them to buy into this fund in the first place?  Now they are going for their exit strategy.  They are invited to be long term investors in this fund, just like the rest.  Hope this will be realised on Saturday.   Handshake Cash




Also read: 

Tan confident of support from iCapital.biz shareholders to against Laxey


How the Top 2 investors of iCAP closed-end fund might have acquired their 10.56% outstanding shares.

From the 1.1.2011 to 7.11.2012, there were 459 market transaction days.
The total number of outstanding iCAP shares is 140,000,000 shares.

The average number of shares traded per day for that period = 89,700 shares
The % of total outstanding shares transacted per day for that period = 0.064%.
The average RM value of shares traded per day for that period = RM 195,249.

The total number of shares traded for that period  = 41,277,700 shares
The % of total outstanding shares transacted for that whole period = 29.5%.
The total RM value of shares traded for that period = RM 89,814,731.


The Top 2 shareholders of iCAP as on 31.5.2012 own 9,028,491 and 5,748,600 shares respectively.
These Top 2 shareholders collectively own 14,777,091 shares or 10.56% of total outstanding shares of iCAP.

Assuming that these Top 2 shareholders started to accumulate their shares in iCAP from 1.1.2011 to 7.11.12, the followings can be inferred:

- they would have been responsible for 35.8% of the total transactions for this period.

- they would have invested a total RM 32,152,965 to acquire a combined total of 14,777,091 shares of iCAP.

- they would have invested an average of RM 70,050 per day to acquire their shares during this period.

- their average price per iCAP share they bought at was about RM 2.18 per share.


Excel worksheet:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B-RRzs61sKqRMG5WZU9mdXJld0E


How To Evaluate The Quality Of EPS and find out what it's telling you about a stock.


Overview  
The evaluation of earnings per share should be a relatively straightforward process, but thanks to the magic of accounting, it has become a game of smoke and mirrors. This, however, does create opportunities for investors who can evaluate the quality of earnings over the long run and take advantage of market overreactions.

EPS Quality  
High-quality EPS means that the number is a relatively true representation of what the company actually earned (i.e. cash generated).  But while evaluating EPS cuts through a lot of the accounting gimmicks, it does not totally eliminate the risk that the financial statements are misrepresented. While it is becoming harder to manipulate the statement of cash flows, it can still be done.
A low-quality EPS number does not accurately portray what the company earned.  A reported number that does not portray the real earnings of the company can mislead investors into making bad investment decisions. 

How to Evaluate the Quality of EPS
The best way to evaluate quality is to compare operating cash flow per share to reported EPS. While this is an easy calculation to make, the required information is often not provided until months after results are announced, when the company files its 10-K or 10-Q with theSEC.

To determine earnings quality, investors can rely on operating cash flow. 
1.  Positive earnings but negative Operating cash flow.Thumbs DownThumbs DownThumbs Down
  • The company can show a positive earnings on the income statement while also bearing a negative cash flow. 
  • This is not a good situation to be in for a long time, because it means that the company has to borrow money to keep operating. And at some point, the bank will stop lending and want to be repaid. 
  • A negative cash flow also indicates that there is a fundamental operating problem: either inventory is not selling or receivables are not getting collected.
  • "Cash is king" is one of the few real truisms on Wall Street, and companies that don't generate cash are not around for long.

2.  Operating cash flow > earnings Thumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs Up
  • If operating cash flow per share (operating cash flow divided by the number of shares used to calculate EPS) is greater than reported EPS.
  • In this case, earnings are of a high quality because the company is generating more cash than is reported on the income statement. 
  • Reported (GAAP) earnings, therefore, understate the profitability of the company.

3.  Operating cash flow < earningsThumbs DownThumbs Up
  • If operating cash flow per share is less than reported EPS, it means that the company is generating less cash than is represented by reported EPS. 
  • In this case, EPS is of low quality because it does not reflect the negative operating results of the company.
  • Therefore, it overstates what the true (cash) operating results. 



Trends Are Also Important
Because a negative cash flow may not necessarily be illegitimate, investors should analyze the trend of both reported EPS and operating cash flow per share (or net income and operating cash flow) in relation to industry trends.
  • It is possible that an entire industry may generate negative operating cash flow due to cyclical causes.
  • Operating cash flows may be negative also because of the company's need to invest in marketing, information systems and R&D. In these cases, the company is sacrificing near-term profitability for longer-term growth.Thumbs Up

Evaluating trends will also help you spot the worst-case scenario, which occurs when a company reports increasingly negative operating cash flow and increasing GAAP EPS. 
  • As discussed above, there may be legitimate reasons for this discrepancy (economic cycles, the need to invest for future growth), but if the company is to survive, the discrepancy cannot last long. 
  • The appearance of growing GAAP EPS even though the company is actually losing money can mislead investors. This is why investors should evaluate the legitimacy of a growing GAAP EPS by analyzing the trend in debt levels, times interest earned, days sales outstanding and inventory turnover.

The Bottom Line
Without question, cash is king on Wall Street, and companies that generate a growing stream of operating cash flow per share are better investments than companies that post increased GAAP EPS growth and negative operating cash flow per share. 
Earnings increasing and Operating cash flow increasingThumbs UpThumbs Up Thumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs Up> Earnings increasing but negative operating cash flowThumbs DownThumbs DownThumbs Down
The ideal situation occurs when operating cash flow per share exceeds GAAP EPS. 

Operating cash flow > EarningsThumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs UpThumbs Up
The worst situation occurs when a company is constantly using cash (causing a negative operating cash flow) while showing positive GAAP EPS. 
Positive Earnings but negative operating cash flow.Thumbs DownThumbs DownThumbs Down
Luckily, it is relatively easy for investors to evaluate the situation. 



An Example
Let's say that Behemoth Software (BS for short) reported that its GAAP EPS was $1. Assume that this number was derived by following GAAP and that management did not fudge its books. And assume further that this number indicates an impressive growth rate of 20%. In most markets, investors would buy this stock.

However, if BS's operating cash flow per share were a negative 50 cents, it would indicate that the company really lost 50 cents of cash per share versus the reported $1. This means that there was a gap of $1.50 between the GAAP EPS and actual cash per share generated by operations. A red flag should alert investors that they need to do more research to determine the cause and duration of the shortfall. The 50 cent negative cash flow per share would have to be financed in some way, such as borrowing from a bank, issuing stock, or selling assets. These activities would be reflected in another section of the cash flow statement.

If BS's operating cash flow per share were $1.50, this would indicate that reported EPS was of high quality because actual cash that BS generated was 50 cents more than was reported under GAAP. A company that can consistently generate growing operating cash flows that are greater than GAAP earnings may be a rarity, but it is generally a very good investment.

Wednesday 7 November 2012

I throw my support for Tan Teng Boo to maintain the status quo in iCAP.


I welcome shareholder activism in iCAP.  This can only be good for this fund.  However, given the short notice of this new development, it would be good to understand the issues deeper.

Questions I pose to myself:
  1. Has iCAP outlived its usefulness and its breakup or liquidation be beneficial to existing shareholders for the long-term??
  2. Has iCAP managers proven themselves incapable of making a decent return?
  3. Would iCAP having a dividend policy be beneficial to the long term investors of this fund?
  4. Would iCAP buying back its own stocks that are trading at a discount necessarily improve market price of its stock?

1.  Has iCAP outlived its usefulness and its breakup or liquidation be beneficial to existing shareholders for the long-term??
iCAP was started in 2005 with a set philosophy laid down by Tan Teng Boo.  The early investors of iCAP subscribe to his philosophy.  The fund was set up to enable small shareholders to invest in the stock market managed by a proven fund manager.  There is a need for such fund to exist.  Therefore, iCAP plays a useful role for those small or big investors whose investing philosophy are aligned with that of Tan Teng Boo, its fund manager.
Therefore, my answer to Question 1 is NO.

2.  Has iCAP managers proven themselves incapable of making a decent return?
We should be wary of short term performances of funds or any investing.  The market volatility can be such that the performances of the short term can fluctuate widely.  Nevertheless, it is the long term return one should be focus on.  On this point, iCAP has more than delivered on its promise at inception to those who are long term invested in this fund.  It has delivered 18% compound annual return in its NAV since 2005.
Therefore, my answer to Question 2 is NO.

3.  Would iCAP having a dividend policy be beneficial to the long term investors of this fund?
iCAP has delivered compound annual returns to its shareholders 18% since inception.  Given its excellent performance since inception, it is rational and logical to retain all earnings to compound at these high rates of returns to grow your networth.  In any case, this objective was stated clearly by Tan Teng Boo when he started this fund.  
Therefore, my answer to Question 3 is NO.

4.  Would iCAP buying back its own stocks that are trading at a discount necessarily improve market price of its stock?
Share buybacks offer advantages and disadvantages.  However, these too do not guarantee that the discount to NAV of the fund will narrow either.  It is not unknown that there are companies that bought back their own shares with little impact on their share price.  In fact, for many, the stock prices even continue with their relentless decline driven by fundamental reasons.  Share buybacks by companies of their own shares are not without their controversies and complicities.
Therefore, my answer to Question 4 is NO.

Tan Teng Boo should mobilise the investors who share his philosophy who are long term invested in his fund to defeat the challenge posed by Laxey Partner.
Hopefully, he will be successful.  After having survived this in the 8th AGM, he will have time to rethink and continue taking this fund to a higher level of performance.  It is far better for Tan Teng Boo and the Board of iCAP to concentrate on investment performance than to worry too much over how to shrink the discount to the NAV of the fund which they have some or little control over.

icapital.biz founder may retire as its manager



PETALING JAYA (Nov 7, 2012): Tan Teng Boo, managing director of Capital Dynamics Asset Management Sdn Bhd (CDAM) which manages icapital.biz Bhd, has announced his and the company's intention to retire as the fund manager of the closed-end fund listed on Bursa Malaysia, ahead of icapital.biz's AGM on Saturday.
This follows the nomination of three individuals, namely Andrew Pegge, Lo Kok Kee and Low Nyap Heng to be part of the fund's board at the upcoming meeting.
In a statement yesterday, Tan said having such individuals on the fund's board would threaten its continued success, which has been delivering an annual compound return of 18% per year since its listing on Oct 19 2005.
"The objective of the three nominees is not only contradictory to the long-term vision of icapital.biz, but also detrimental to the sustainability of the fund's future.
"Based on their previous track records, the three individuals are only concerned with short-term gains, while ignoring the interest of the majority of the share owners in the long run," he said.
Tan warned that if any one of the three persons is voted in at the AGM, CDAM will "seriously reconsider" its position as the fund manager and retire "because our philosophy, values and objectives are diametrically opposite to theirs".
"CDAM works hard at building sustainable long-term values, based on principles of integrity."
Tan also pointed to the track record of UK-based Laxey Partners Ltd, the firm of Pegge, which he described as "extremely disappointing".
He cited the share price of The Value Catalyst Fund, a closed-end fund launched by Laxey Partners in December 2005, which had plunged by 58% when it was suspended in June 2011.
"Another fund managed by Laxey Partners, The Terra Catalyst Fund, has consistently traded in discounts since it was launched in Feb 2008.
"In addition to its poor performance as a fund manager, Laxey Partners and Pegge were fined 1 million Swiss Francs by the banking regulator from Switzerland in 2008," he said.
Shares of icapital.biz closed up 7 sen at RM2.56 yesterday, with 789,300 shares traded.