Showing posts with label red flags. Show all posts
Showing posts with label red flags. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 December 2025

Warren Buffett: The 4 Balance Sheet Red Flags That Predict Bankruptcy

 



Warren Buffett's Guide to Spotting Bankruptcy: The 4 Balance Sheet Red Flags

For any investor, avoiding catastrophic losses is just as important as finding winners. In this talk, Warren Buffett distills seven decades of experience into four simple, powerful balance sheet red flags that predict financial distress with remarkable accuracy. Ignoring these signs once cost him $358 million on a US Air investment. Here’s how you can protect your capital.

The Core Philosophy: The Balance Sheet Never Lies

Most investors focus on the income statement—revenue and earnings growth. But that’s the rearview mirror. The balance sheet is your windshield; it shows whether a company has the financial strength to survive the road ahead. Revenue can be manipulated, but cash, debt, and working capital reveal the unvarnished truth.

The 4 Red Flags That Predict Bankruptcy

1. Excessive Debt Relative to Equity

  • What it is: A dangerously high debt-to-equity ratio. Debt creates mandatory payments; equity provides flexibility.

  • Why it’s fatal: In a downturn, debt payments become a noose. Creditors can force bankruptcy if payments are missed.

  • The Lesson from Lehman Brothers: In 2007, Lehman had a debt-to-equity ratio of 30-to-1. When its assets lost just 3.3% of their value, shareholder equity was wiped out. This massive leverage made its collapse inevitable.

  • Your Action: Calculate Total Debt / Total Equity. For most companies, a ratio above 2-3 is dangerous. Watch the trend—if it’s rising, risk is increasing.

2. Declining Cash & Ballooning Receivables

  • What it is: Cash is falling while accounts receivable (money owed by customers) is rising much faster than sales.

  • Why it’s fatal: It signals customers aren’t paying, or the company is offering desperate credit terms to book fake revenue. This creates an illusion of growth while the company runs out of real money.

  • The Lesson from a 1990s Tech Firm: It reported 20% growth, but cash halved while receivables soared 150%. The "revenue" was uncollectable, and the stock crashed.

  • Your Action: Calculate Days Sales Outstanding (DSO). A DSO rising above 90-120 days is a major red flag. Monitor the cash conversion cycle.

3. Declining Tangible Assets / Inflated Intangibles

  • What it is: A balance sheet loaded with goodwill and intangible assets but lacking tangible assets (cash, inventory, property) that hold real value in a crisis.

  • Why it’s fatal: Goodwill is worth $0 in bankruptcy. It’s an accounting entry for overpayment on past acquisitions. A company with negative tangible equity has no real asset cushion.

  • The Lesson from General Electric: GE accumulated $75B in goodwill. When stripped away, its tangible equity was negative. The eventual write-offs devastated the stock.

  • Your Action: Calculate Tangible Equity (Total Equity - Intangibles). If it’s low or negative, the company’s financial strength is an illusion.

4. Inadequate Working Capital

  • What it is: Current liabilities exceed current assets (a current ratio below 1.0), meaning the company can’t cover bills due within a year.

  • Why it’s fatal: It leaves no margin for error. Any disruption—a sales miss, a delayed payment—can cause immediate insolvency.

  • The Lesson from Toys "R" Us: Before its 2017 bankruptcy, its current ratio was 0.73. It was dependent on perfect holiday sales and collapsed when they disappointed.

  • Your Action: Calculate the Current Ratio and the more conservative Quick Ratio (excludes inventory). Understand why it’s low: Is it from efficiency (like Amazon) or from distress (high debt, no cash)?

The Ultimate Warning: Multiple Red Flags

A single flag can be a warning, but multiple flags are a death sentenceSears Holdings is the classic example. Years before its 2018 bankruptcy, it exhibited all four: soaring debt, vanishing cash, negative tangible equity, and crippled working capital. The balance sheet told the entire story years in advance.

The Buffett Playbook: How to Act on This Knowledge

  1. For Current Holdings: If a company you own shows these signs, sell immediately. Do not hope for a turnaround. "Take your loss and move on."

  2. For New Investments: Screen the balance sheet first, before looking at the growth story. If red flags appear, walk away. There are thousands of stocks; avoid the financially distressed.

  3. For Business Owners: Use these principles to build a "fortress balance sheet" for your own company. Prioritize survival over aggressive growth.

The Investor's Mindset

  • Seek Simplicity: These four rules are simple but have proven effective across decades and industries.

  • Prioritize Safety: The best managers are obsessed with balance sheet strength. They know survival comes first, growth second. Look for companies with minimal debt, ample cash, and strong working capital—they sleep well at night and emerge stronger from crises.

  • Trust Reality: "Cash is cash. Debt is debt. Working capital is working capital." These numbers reflect reality. Learning to read them will put you ahead of 90% of investors.

Final Takeaway: You don't need to predict the future. You just need to read the present accurately on the balance sheet. This discipline will help you avoid catastrophic losses and build lasting wealth by investing in companies built to last.


=====

Based on the transcript provided, here is a summary of the content from 0 to 10 minutes:

Key Point: Warren Buffett introduces a personal, costly lesson about ignoring balance sheet warning signs, leading to a $358 million loss from a 1989 investment in US Air.

The Story:

  • In 1989, US Air approached Buffett seeking a $358 million investment. On the surface, the airline industry was recovering and the company looked fine.

  • Despite seeing four specific red flags on the balance sheet that made him "deeply uncomfortable"—concerning debt levels, weak cash position, unsupported tangible assets, and fragile working capital—Buffett invested anyway.

  • He ignored his gut and analysis because he liked the management, thought the preferred stock terms protected him, and believed an industry turnaround would fix the problems.

  • This was a major mistake. US Air struggled for years, the balance sheet issues persisted, and Buffett had to write down a significant portion of the investment.

The Core Lesson:

  • "The balance sheet never lies." It reveals whether a company is heading for bankruptcy, but only if you know what to look for and have the discipline to act on it.

  • Buffett contrasts the balance sheet with the income statement:

    • The income statement is a rearview mirror—a historical snapshot of past profitability that can be manipulated.

    • The balance sheet tells you about the future—it shows a company's financial strength and its ability to survive hard times, pay debts, and invest. Its numbers (cash, debt, assets) are much harder to fake.

  • He credits his mentor, Benjamin Graham, for teaching him to see the balance sheet as a "financial X-ray" that can spot trouble long before it becomes obvious. The goal is to find a "margin of safety"—companies with strong balance sheets can survive shocks, while weak ones collapse at the first sign of trouble.

Transition: Buffett promises to share the four balance sheet red flags that predict bankruptcy with remarkable accuracy, patterns he has observed over seven decades in major failures like Enron and Lehman Brothers.


Here is a summary of Warren Buffett's explanation from approximately 10 to 20 minutes, covering Red Flags #1 and #2:

Red Flag #1: Excessive Debt Relative to Equity

  • The Core Idea: This is the single best predictor of bankruptcy. Debt creates mandatory payments that must be made regardless of business conditions, while equity (ownership) provides flexibility. A high debt-to-equity ratio means a company has no financial cushion.

  • The Danger: A company with high debt is "one bad quarter away from disaster." If business slows, it cannot service its debt, creditors can force liquidation, and equity can be wiped out.

  • Case Study - Lehman Brothers (2008):

    • In 2007, Lehman had $680 billion in assets but $613 billion in debt and only about $22 billion in equity.

    • This created a debt-to-equity ratio of nearly 30-to-1, meaning if their assets lost just 3.3% of their value, shareholder equity would be completely erased.

    • When the housing market declined and their mortgage-backed assets lost value, this exact scenario played out, leading to the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.

  • How to Use This:

    • Calculate the ratio: Total Debt / Total Equity.

    • For most non-financial companies, a ratio above 2 or 3 is dangerous. Above 5 is "walking a tightrope."

    • Look at the trend. An increasing ratio is a warning sign of growing risk.

Red Flag #2: Declining Cash & Ballooning Receivables

  • The Core Idea: When cash is falling while accounts receivable (money owed by customers) is rising much faster than sales, it's a major red flag.

  • What It Signals:

    1. Customers aren't paying their bills.

    2. The company is offering overly generous payment terms (e.g., 90 days instead of 30) just to make sales and hit revenue targets.

  • The Reality: This creates the illusion of growth on the income statement, but the company isn't collecting real money. You can't pay bills with receivables.

  • Case Study - A 1990s Tech Manufacturer:

    • Reported fantastic 20% annual revenue growth.

    • But over two years, cash halved (from $100M to $50M) while receivables soared 150% (from $80M to $200M) on only 40% sales growth.

    • This disconnect revealed they were booking fake revenue from customers who couldn't pay. The company eventually collapsed.

  • How to Use This:

    • Calculate Days Sales Outstanding (DSO): (Accounts Receivable / Annual Revenue) x 365.

    • A DSO rising above 90-120 days is a red flag.

    • Monitor the cash conversion cycle; if it's increasing, the company is tying up more capital in operations and running low on cash.

Conclusion of this segment: These first two flags—runaway debt and a deteriorating cash collection cycle—are powerful early warnings that a company's financial health is in serious decline.


Here is a summary of Warren Buffett's explanation from approximately 20 to 30 minutes, covering Red Flag #3 and introducing Red Flag #4:

Red Flag #3: Declining Tangible Assets / Inflated Intangibles

  • The Core Idea: A buildup of intangible assets (like goodwill, patents, brand value) that don't have real, realizable economic value is a major warning sign. In a crisis, you can't sell them to raise cash.

  • The Critical Problem - Goodwill: This is an accounting entry representing the premium paid for acquisitions. In bankruptcy, goodwill is worth $0. A balance sheet loaded with goodwill can look strong on paper but be hollow in reality.

  • Case Study - General Electric:

    • GE grew for decades through acquisitions, accumulating about $75 billion in goodwill on its balance sheet by 2017.

    • However, its tangible equity (real net worth after subtracting intangibles and liabilities) was actually negative.

    • When business struggled, GE had to write off billions in goodwill, admitting the acquisitions didn't create the promised value. The stock collapsed.

  • How to Use This:

    • Calculate Tangible Equity: Total Equity - Intangible Assets.

    • If tangible equity is low or negative, the company lacks real financial strength and is vulnerable.

    • Watch the trend: If intangibles are growing faster than tangible assets, management may be focused on risky "empire building" through overpriced acquisitions rather than creating real value.

Red Flag #4: Inadequate Working Capital

  • The Core Idea: Working capital (Current Assets - Current Liabilities) is the lifeblood for day-to-day operations. If a company doesn't have enough liquid assets to cover bills due within a year, it can't survive disruptions.

  • The Key Metric - Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities. A ratio below 1.0 is a danger zone, meaning short-term debts exceed liquid assets.

  • Case Study - Toys "R" Us (2017):

    • The year before bankruptcy, its current ratio was 0.73 ($2.2B in current assets vs. $3B in current liabilities).

    • It was dependent on perfect holiday sales to generate cash. When sales disappointed, it had no cushion and filed for bankruptcy.

  • Important Distinction: Some strong companies (like Amazon) operate with low working capital due to efficiency and market power (collecting cash fast, paying suppliers slow). The red flag is when it's due to distress—high short-term debt and minimal cash.

  • How to Use This:

    • Calculate the Current Ratio and the more conservative Quick Ratio (which excludes less-liquid inventory).

    • Look at the trend and components. Is the low ratio due to rising debt and falling cash? That's the warning.

    • Check if the company generates enough cash from operations to fund its working capital needs.

Transition: Buffett notes that a single red flag can be manageable, but when multiple flags appear together (e.g., high debt, falling cash, inflated intangibles, and poor working capital), bankruptcy becomes highly probable, as seen in the case of Sears Holdings.


Here is a summary of Warren Buffett's explanation from approximately 30 to 40 minutes, covering the conclusion and practical application of the four red flags:

The Danger of Multiple Red Flags

Buffett emphasizes that the most dangerous situation is when all four red flags appear simultaneously in a company.

  • Case Study - Sears Holdings: By 2010, Sears showed concerning debt levels. Over the following years, the pattern worsened: cash declined, tangible equity turned negative as they sold off real estate, and working capital deteriorated until vendors demanded cash on delivery.

  • The Result: All four red flags were waving years in advance. The 2018 bankruptcy was "inevitable" for anyone reading the balance sheet accurately.

How to Use This Information Practically

Buffett provides clear, actionable advice for investors and business managers:

  1. If You Own the Stock: If a company you own shows these red flags, sell immediately. Don't hold on hoping for a turnaround. "Listen, sell before the bankruptcy. Take your loss and move on."

  2. If You Are Considering Investing: Check for these red flags first, before looking at the income statement or growth story. If you see them, walk away. "There are thousands of stocks to choose from. Why invest in one that's showing signs of financial distress?"

  3. If You Run a Business: Use these principles to prevent trouble in your own company. Monitor debt, cash flow, and working capital. Avoid overpaying for acquisitions that create hollow goodwill.

The Buffett Philosophy: Simplicity and Safety

  • Simplicity Works: Some may argue finance is more complex, but Buffett states these four simple flags have been reliable predictors across decades and industries.

  • The Managerial Mindset: Companies that fail are often run by managers focused on growth, deals, and income statements, not balance sheet strength. The best managers are "obsessed with balance sheet strength" because survival comes first, growth second.

  • Berkshire's "Fortress" Approach: At his own company, Buffett maintains a "fortress balance sheet" with minimal debt and lots of cash. This conservative approach allows them to sleep well and be ready to seize opportunities during crises.

Final Takeaway

Buffett's core closing message is: "The balance sheet never lies."

  • Revenue and earnings can be manipulated, but cash is cash, and debt is debt.

  • Learning to read these signs will put you "ahead of 90% of investors," allowing you to avoid failing companies and identify strong ones.

  • The discipline to act on these four red flags—excessive debt, declining cash with rising receivables, inflated intangibles, and inadequate working capital—has saved him from disaster and will serve any disciplined investor or business leader.


Here is a summary of the content from 40 minutes to the end (53 minutes):

Key Clarification on Working Capital

Buffett acknowledges that some strong companies (like Amazon and Walmart) can operate with low or negative working capital as a sign of efficiency and market power—they collect cash quickly from customers and pay suppliers slowly. The red flag is when negative working capital stems from financial distress: high short-term debt and minimal cash, as seen with Toys "R" Us. The key is to analyze the components and trend.

The Ultimate Danger: Multiple Red Flags

The most dangerous situation is when all four red flags appear together. Buffett provides a detailed case study of Sears Holdings:

  • Excessive Debt: Debt-to-equity was concerning and kept increasing.

  • Declining Cash: Cash reserves fell steadily from over $1 billion to a few hundred million.

  • Inflated Intangibles / Negative Tangible Equity: Had billions in goodwill; by 2017, tangible equity was negative.

  • Inadequate Working Capital: Current liabilities exceeded assets; vendors demanded cash on delivery.
    All four flags were waving years in advance, making the 2018 bankruptcy inevitable for observant investors.

Practical Action Steps

  1. If you own the stock: Sell immediately when you see these red flags. "Take your loss and move on. Don't ride it all the way to zero."

  2. If you are considering investing: Check the balance sheet and these ratios first. If red flags appear, walk away. "Why invest in one that's showing signs of financial distress?"

  3. If you run a business: Use these principles preventatively. Don't let debt, cash flow, or working capital deteriorate.

The Philosophy of Simplicity and Safety

  • While finance is complex, these four simple red flags have been reliable predictors for decades across industries.

  • The best managers are obsessed with balance sheet strength. They prioritize survival over growth, ensuring they have a "fortress balance sheet" (like Berkshire Hathaway's) to weather any storm and seize opportunities.

  • Failing companies are often run by managers focused on growth stories and income statements, ignoring the harsh reality of the balance sheet until it's too late.

Final, Powerful Conclusion

  • "The balance sheet never lies." Revenue and earnings can be manipulated, but cash, debt, and working capital reflect reality.

  • Learning to read these four signs will put you ahead of 90% of investors, allowing you to avoid bankruptcies and identify strong businesses.

  • The discipline to act on excessive debt, declining cash with rising receivables, inflated intangibles, and inadequate working capital has saved Buffett from disaster and will guide anyone to safer, smarter investing. "The balance sheet is telling you everything you need to know. You just have to listen."

Sunday, 21 April 2024

Detecting Frauds. When to Sell. Avoiding Value Traps.

 



Filter out noise and focus on information that are important for investing.



VALUE TRAPS

How do you decide whether it is a value trap or not?

Value traps are statistically very cheap and very alluring.

First question to ask:  “Why is God so kind on you that you are the only one who has this tremendous insight that this stock is cheap and all the other people who are very active, smart and intelligent in the market are ignoring this company?”

Is there an embedded growth optionality in the company? Can the company have a growth phase? Can the company come out with some new product offering which can introduce growth? 

This is a dynamic exercise.  You will need to revisit the hypothesis every now and again, at intervals. 

Two characteristics of value traps are:

  • (1)  They typically don’t tend to grow more than the nominal GDP
  • (2)  They cannot reinvest their cash flow.

So the question you should ask is what is the catalyst which will change this and allow them to reinvest the capital which they are throwing off?  In its absence, you have a classic example where the company had great cash flows and no catalyst.  

Your sole focus of whether to participate in a seemingly value trap could be you calling out the catalyst that will catapult it out of this situation.



Tuesday, 8 August 2017

Red Flags

Red flags

1) Declining cash flow: 
  • if cash from operations decline even as net income keeps marching upwards or 
  • if cash from operations increase much more slowly than net income. 
  • AR increased to a large percentage of sales.
  • Inventories increase

2) Serial chargers: 
  • frequent chargers are an open invitation to accounting hanky panky because forms can bury bad decisions in a single restructuring charge. 
  • Poor decisions that might need to be paid for in future quarters all get rolled into a single one-time charge in the current quarter, which improves future result.

3) Serial acquirers: 
  • acquisitive firms don’t spend as much time checking out their targets as they should.

4) CFO or auditors leave the company: 
  • If a company fires its auditors after some potentially damaging accounting issue has come to light, watch out.

5) The bills aren’t being paid:  
  • One way to pump up its growth rate is to loosen customers’ credit terms, which induces them to buy more products or services. 
  • If they don’t get paid, it will come back to haunt them in the form of a nasty write-down or charge against earnings. 
  • Track how A/R are increasing relative to sales. 
  • On the credit front, watch the ‘allowance for doubtful accounts’. 
  • If the amount doesn’t move up in sync with A/R, the company may be artificially boosting its results by being overly optimistic about how many of its new customers will pay its bill.

6) Changes in credit terms and account receivable: 
  • Check the company’s 10-Q filing for any mentions of changes in credit terms for customers, as well as for any explanation by management as to why A/R has jumped. 
  • ( Look in the management’s discussion and analysis section for the latter and in the accounting footnotes for the former.)

7) Gains from investments: 
  • an honest company breaks out these sales, however, and reports them below the ‘operating income’ line on its income statement. 
  • The problem arises when companies try to boost their operating results- performance of their core business-by shoehorning investment income into other parts of their financial statements. 
  • Finally, companies can hide investment gains in their expense accounts by using them to reduce operating expenses, which makes the firm look more efficient than it really is.

8) Pension pitfalls: 
  • If assets in the pension plan don’t increase quickly enough, the firm has to divert profits to prop up the pension. 
  • To fund pension payments to future retirees, companies shovel money into pension plans that then are invested in stocks, bonds, real estate, and so forth. 
  • If a company winds up with fewer pension assets than pension liabilities, it has an underfunded plan, and if the company has more than enough pension assets to meet its projected obligations to retirees, it has an overfunded plan. 
  • To see whether the company has an over-or underfunded pension plan, go to the footnotes of a 10-K filling and look for the note labeled ‘pension and other postretirement benefits’, ‘employee retirement benefits’, or some variation. Then look at the line labeled ‘projected benefit obligation.’ This is the estimated amount the company will owe to employees after they retire.
  • Second key number is ‘fair value of plan assets at the end of year’. If the benefit obligation exceeds the plan assets, the company has an underfunded pension plan and is likely to have shovel in more money in future, reducing profits.
  • Pension padding: When stocks and bonds do really well, pension plans go gangbusters. And if those annual returns exceed the annual pension costs, the excess can be profits. Flowing gains from an overfunded pension plan through the income statement is a perfectly legal practice that pumped up earnings at GE. You should subtract it from net income when trying to figure out just how profitable a company really is.
  • To find out how much profits decreased because of pension costs or increased because of pension gains, go to the line in the pension footnote labeled either ‘net pension/postretirement expense’, ‘net pension credit/loss’. 
  • Companies usually break out the contribution of pension costs to profits for the trailing three years; therefore, you can see not only the absolute level of pension profit or loss, but also the trend. Won’t see these numbers in the income statement.

9) Vanishing cash flow: 
  • you can’t count on cash flow generated by employees exercising options.  
  • The amount is labeled ‘tax benefits from employee stock plan’ or ‘tax benefits of stock options exercised’ on the statement of cash flows. 
  • When employees exercise their stock options, the amount of cash taxes their employer has to pay declines. 
  • If the stock price takes a tumble, many people’s options will be worthless and, consequently, fewer options will be exercised. 
  • Fewer options are now exercised, the company’s tax deduction gets smaller, and it has to pay more taxes than before, which means lower cash flow. 
  • If you are analyzing a company with great cash flow that also has a high flying stock, check to see how much of that cash flow growth is coming from options-related tax benefits.
  
10) Overstuffed Warehouses: 
  • When inventories rise faster than sales, there is likely to be trouble on the horizon.  
  • Sometimes buildup is just temporary as a company prepares for a new product launch, usually exception.

11) Change is bad: 
  • another way firm can make themselves look better is by changing any one of a number of assumptions in their financial statements. 
  • Look skeptically on any optional change that improve results. 
  • One item that can be altered is depreciation expense (see if extend depreciation period). 
  • Firms can also change their allowance for doubtful accounts. 
  • If it doesn’t increase at the same rate as accounts receivable, a firm is essentially saying that its new customers are much more creditworthy than the previous ones-which is pretty much unlikely. 
  • If the allowance declines as AR rises, the company is stretching the truth even further. Current results are overstated. 
  • Firms can also change things as basic as how expenses are recorded and when revenue is recognized.

12) To expense or not to expense:  
  • Company can fiddle with their costs by capitalizing them. 
  • Any time you see expenses being capitalized, ask some hard questions about just how long that ‘asset’ will generate an economic benefit.

https://docslide.us/documents/pat-dorsey-5-rules-for-successful-stock-investing-summary.html

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

Late filing of financial accounts

Unfortunately, a small minority of companies file their accounts late or even not at all.

This is an offence for which the directors can be punished and the company incur a penalty, but it does happen.

It is often companies with problems that file late.

Sunday, 15 January 2017

Business value cannot be precisely determined. Make use of ranges of values.

Business value cannot be precisely determined. 

Not only do a number of assumptions go into a business valuation, but relevant macro and micro economic factors are constantly changing, making a precise valuation impossible. 

Although anyone with a calculator or a spreadsheet can calculate a net present value of future cash flows, the precise values calculated are only as accurate as the underlying assumptions.

Investors should instead make use of ranges of values, and in some cases, of applying a base value. 

Ben Graham wrote:
The essential point is that security analysis does not seek to determine exactly what is the intrinsic value of a given security. It needs only to establish that the value is adequate—e.g., to pro­tect a bond or to justify a stock purchase—or else that the value is considerably higher or considerably lower than the market price. For such purposes an indefinite and approximate measure of the intrinsic value may be sufficient.




There are only three ways to value a business. 

1.   The first method involves finding the net present value by discounting future cash flows. 

Problems with this method involve trying to predict future cash flows, and determining a discount rate. 

Investors should err on the side of conservatism in making assumptions for use in net present value calculations, and even then a margin of safety should be applied.


2.  The second method is Private Market Value using Multiples. 

This is a multiples approach (e.g. P/E, EV/Sales) based on what business people have paid to acquire whole companies of a similar nature. 

The problems with this method are that comparables assume businesses are all equal, which they are not. 

Furthermore, exuberance can cause business people to make silly decisions. 

Therefore, basing your price on a price based on irrationality can lead to disaster. 

This is believed to be the least useful of the three valuation methods.


3.  Finally, liquidation value as a method of valuation. 

A distinction must be made between a company undergoing a fire sale (i.e. it needs to liquidate immediately to pay debts) and one that can liquidate over time. 

Fixed assets can be difficult to value, as some thought must be given to how customised the assets are (e.g. downtown real-estate is easily sold, mining equipment may not be).





When should each method be employed? 

They can all be used simultaneously to triangulate towards a value. 

In some cases, however, one might place more confidence in one method over the others. 

For example, 
  • liquidation value would be more useful for a company with losses that trades below book valuewhile 
  • net present value is more useful for a company with stable cash flows.

Using the methods of valuation described, you can search for stocks that are trading at a severe discount; it is possible, their stock price more than doubled soon after.




Beware of these failures

The failures of relying on a company's earnings per share - too easily massaged.

The failure of relying on a company's book value  - not necessarily relevant to today's value.

The failure of relying on a company's dividend yield - incentives of management to make yields appear attractive at the expense of the company's future.





Read also: