Showing posts with label market capitalisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label market capitalisation. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 December 2025

An overview of the core objectives of corporate management and how they are measured

 The primary aim of management is to increase





Book Value

Book value (shareholders' equity on the company's balance sheet) is calculated as total assets less total liabilities.

It reflects the historical operating and financing decisions made by the company.

Management can directly influence book value (e.g., by retaining net income).


Market Value

However, management can only indirectly influence a company's market value.

Market value of a company is primarily determined by investors' expectations about the about, timing and uncertainty of the company's future cash flows

A company may increase its book value by retaining net income, but it will only have a positive effect on the company's market value if investors expect the company to invest its retained earnings in profitable growth opportunities.

If investors believe that the company has a significant number of cash flow generating investment opportunities coming through, the market value of the company's equity will exceed its book value.



Price to book ratio (market to book ratio)

A useful ratio to evaluate investor's expectations about a company is the price to book ratio.

If a company has a price to book ratio that is greater than industry average, it suggests that investors believe that the company has more significant future growth opportunities than its industry peers.

It may not be appropriate to compare price to book ratios of companies in different industries because the ratio also reflects investors' growth outlook for the industry itself.


Accounting Return on Equity

An important measure used by investors to evaluate the effectiveness of management in increasing the company's book value is accounting return on equity.




=====



This is an overview of the core objectives of corporate management and how they are measured. Let's break it down, discuss the implications, and provide a summary.

Analysis & Discussion

The text correctly identifies a fundamental tension in management: the direct control over book value versus the indirect, influence-driven relationship with market value. This is the heart of modern financial management.

1. The Dual Aims: A Hierarchy, Not an Equality
While both are aims, increasing market value is the primary, ultimate goal in shareholder-oriented capitalism. Increasing book value is often a means to that end, but not an end in itself. The text makes this clear:

  • Book Value is Backward-Looking & Controllable: It's an accounting cumulative snapshot. Management can boost it directly by retaining earnings (instead of paying dividends) or issuing new equity. However, this action in isolation has no intrinsic merit.

  • Market Value is Forward-Looking & Judgment-Based: It represents the collective present-value judgment of all investors on the future use of those retained earnings and assets. Management influences this through strategic decisions, communication (guidance), and track record.

2. The Critical Bridge: Investment in Positive-NPV Projects
The key insight is the condition under which increasing book value also increases market value: only if retained earnings are invested in profitable growth opportunities (i.e., projects with a return exceeding the cost of capital).

  • Example of Failure: A mature company with no growth opportunities retains earnings, increasing book value. If investors believe this cash will be spent on low-return projects or sit idle, the market value will stagnate or even fall. The increase in book value is seen as destroying value by denying shareholders the chance to invest the dividends elsewhere.

  • Example of Success: A tech company retains earnings to fund R&D for a promising new product. Investors anticipate high future cash flows, so market value rises in anticipation, often well before the book value reflects the investment.

3. Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio: The Indicator of Expectations
The P/B ratio perfectly encapsulates this dynamic:

  • P/B > 1 (especially above industry average): The market believes the company's assets (and future investments) will generate returns above their accounting (historical) cost. This reflects intangible value—brands, patents, human capital, strategic position—and expected growth. This is typical for technology, pharma, and consumer goods companies.

  • P/B ≈ 1 or < 1: Suggests the market sees the company as a "cash cow" with limited growth, or potentially one that is inefficiently deploying its assets. It is common for capital-intensive, slow-growth, or distressed industries (e.g., utilities, traditional manufacturing). A P/B < 1 can signal a value opportunity or fundamental problems.

4. Return on Equity (ROE): The Engine for Book Value Growth
Accounting ROE (Net Income / Shareholders' Equity) is rightly highlighted as the metric for how effectively management uses book value.

  • Link to Growth (Sustainable Growth Rate): A high ROE, when earnings are retained, allows for faster organic growth of book value. The formula Sustainable Growth Rate = ROE * Retention Ratio demonstrates this directly.

  • The Crucial Caveat: ROE is an accounting measure and can be manipulated (via leverage, accounting choices). A high ROE driven by excessive debt increases risk. Therefore, investors look at both the level and the quality of ROE. The ultimate test is whether a high ROE leads to an increasing P/B ratio and market value.

Critical Comments & Nuances

  1. Limits of Book Value: In today's knowledge economy, book value is increasingly disconnected from real economic value. It ignores key assets like intellectual property, brand equity, and data, while often carrying assets at historical cost.

  2. Market Value Short-Termism: While market value is the goal, its short-term fluctuations can pressure management into decisions that boost quarterly earnings at the expense of long-term value creation (e.g., cutting R&D).

  3. Industry Context is King: Comparing P/B or ROE across industries is often meaningless. A utility with a stable P/B of 1.2 and ROE of 9% might be excellently managed, while a software company with the same stats would be considered a failure.

  4. Other Stakeholders: This framework is purely shareholder-centric. Modern governance also considers stakeholders (employees, community, environment), which can influence both book value (e.g., through ESG investments) and market value (through reputation and license to operate).

Summary

Management's primary aim is to maximize shareholder wealth, best represented by the company's market value. To achieve this:

  • Book Value is the accounting foundation, representing accumulated capital. Management can increase it directly, but this only matters if the capital is deployed wisely.

  • Market Value is the ultimate scorecard, reflecting investors' faith in management's ability to generate future cash flows from current and future assets.

  • The Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio measures the gap between these two values. A high P/B indicates the market expects management to earn super-normal returns on the company's asset base.

  • Accounting Return on Equity (ROE) is the key internal metric for assessing how efficiently management generates profits from the book equity. It fuels book value growth, but only translates into market value growth if the profits are sustainable and from value-creating projects.

In essence, successful management is about investing retained earnings (and other capital) into projects whose expected returns are significantly above the cost of capital. This drives up ROE, which, if sustainable and recognized by the market, leads to a high and increasing P/B ratio and, consequently, the maximization of market value. The art of management lies in executing this while balancing short-term expectations with long-term strategy and broader stakeholder considerations.

Tuesday, 19 May 2020

Is it inexpensive? Four different price metrics:


#Nothing is worth infinity. 

We can overpay for even the best of companies.

So even if we understand a business (first step) and find it to be good (second step) we can still make a bad investment by paying too much.

The third step in the value investing model asks a final fundamental question: Is it inexpensive?



Inexpensiveness can be detected with four different price metrics:
1. Times free cash flow (MCAP/FCF)
2. Enterprise value to operating income (EV/OI)
3. Price to book (MCAP/BV)
4. Price to tangible book value (MCAP/TBV)



#Price metrics

1.  Times free cash flow. 

It equals a company’s market capitalization divided by its levered free cash flow. It’s abbreviated
MCAP/FCF.

The denominator, levered free cash flow. 
  • It’s cash flow from operations minus capex. 
  • Note that it captures the payment of both interest and taxes.
The numerator, market capitalization, is often shortened to market cap.
  • It’s the number of shares outstanding times the current price per share.
Notice the consistency between numerator and denominator.
  • Market cap is the price for the equity only. 
  • Levered free cash flow is the cash thrown off by the business after debtholders have been paid their interest.  Hence levered free cash flow goes to the equity holders.
Theoretically, market cap is what it would cost to buy all of a company’s outstanding shares.
  • But it’s actually an underestimate. 
  • That’s because the current share price reflects only what some shareholders were—moments ago—willing to take for their stock. 
  • Most are holding out for more.




2.  Enterprise value to operating income. 
It’s abbreviated EV/OI.

The denominator, operating income. 
  • It’s revenue, minus cost of goods sold, minus operating expenses. 
  • Note that it’s not net of interest or tax expenses.
The numerator, enterprise value, is the theoretical takeover price.
  • It’s what one would fork over to buy the entire companynot just the outstanding shares.
  • Paying it would leave no one else with any financial claim on the company. 
  • There’d be no outside common stockholders, no preferred shareholders, no minority partners in subsidiaries, no bondholders, no bank creditors, no one.

Enterprise value is a tricky concept, for two reasons.

1.  First, it’s derived in part from current market prices.
  • So in name, it defies the value investing distinction between price and value. 
  • The term enterprise price would make more sense.
2.  Second, it’s harder to calculate.
  • In essence, it equals market cap plus the market price of all of the company’s preferred equity, noncontrolling interest, and debt and minus cash.

Like market cap, the enterprise value of a particular company is given on financial websites. Such off-the-shelf figures are convenient. But if a company looks promising, it’s wise to calculate enterprise value longhand. To see why, consider its components.



3.  Price to book. 
It equals market cap divided by book value. It’s abbreviated MCAP/BV.

Book value, recall, equals balance sheet equity.


4.  Price to tangible book value, or MCAP/TBV. 
It’s MCAP/BV with intangible assets removed from the denominator.   Patents, trademarks, goodwill, and other assets that aren’t physical get subtracted.

MCAP/TBV is a harsher measure than MCAP/BV.
  • It effectively marks any asset that can’t be touched down to zero. 
  • Some situations are better suited to this severity than others. 
To see which ones, we revisit goodwill.

Recall that goodwill equals acquisition price in excess of book value.
  • We gave the example of company B having book value of $1,000,000; company A acquiring it for $1,500,000 in cash; and company A increasing the goodwill on its balance sheet by $500,000.
Note the assumption embedded in this practice.
  • Goodwill is an asset. 
  • So in buying company B and goodwill, company A is swapping assets for assets. That’s how accounting sees it. 
  • No expense is recognized on the income statement, and no liability is booked on the balance sheet. 
  • Nothing bad occurs.


#What’s inexpensive, and what isn’t?

1.  MCAP/FCF and EV/OI

When we calculate price metrics, we get actual numbers. MCAP/FCF may be 5, or 50. EV/OI may be 3, or 30. What’s inexpensive, and what isn’t?

I like MCAP/FCF to be no higher than 8, and EV/OI to be no higher than 7.  

Before moving on to benchmarks for the other two price metrics, let’s understand what these first two multiples mean.
  • Imagine that a company’s future operating income will be $1,000,000 for each of the next 100 years. Discounting that stream back at—say—10 percent yields $9,999,274.
  • That quantity, $9,999,274, is nearly $10 million. Notice that $10 million is 10 times the forecasted annual operating income.
  • So if one calculates a company’s EV/OI as 10, that could mean that the market thinks operating earnings will be $1,000,000 for each of the next 100 years, and 10 percent is the right discount rate.
  • Or, it could be mean that the market thinks operating income for the next 100 years will grow 4 percent annually from a $1,000,000 base, and that 14 percent is the right discount rate.

In other words, multiples are shorthand. 
  • They’re shorthand for a formal present value analysis. 
  • In them are embedded beliefs about growth rates and discount rates.

Holding everything else equal, it’s better to own a company with income that’s growing than one with income that isn’t. 

So when I say that I want EV/OI to be no higher than 7, what I’m saying is that I’ll only buy a stream of future operating income when it’s offered to me at a high discount rate.

Of course one never knows just what future operating earnings will be. Same with free cash flow. And where the exact discount rates come from isn’t important.

What is important is this: 
"low price multiples signal buying opportunities to the value investor when they reflect unjustifiably high discount rates."





2.  MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV

The other two price metrics, MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV, are a little different. 
  • They don’t reflect a stream of future anything. 
  • They’re multiples of what a company has now.

I prefer both MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV to be no higher than 3.

But these are just qualifiers for me. They’re not what I look for.

What I look for is MCAP/FCF and EV/OI. 

It’s worth exploring why.


#Why MCAP/FCF and EV/OI are preferred to MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV?

I aim to own companies that continue as going concerns.

  • I want them alive. 
  • Profitable ones are worth more that way. 


But MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV express price relative to the value of companies dead. 
  • If a firm stopped operating and sold everything—if it liquidated—the total amount available to distribute to shareholders would have something to do with its book value. 
  • But when I buy a stock, I don’t hope for a stake in some dead company’s yard sale. I’m buying a claim on future streams of income and cash flow.


This isn’t to say that MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV are useless. They can uncover opportunities. 
  • Say that a company’s EV/OI is 9, and that both MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV are 6. 
  • The company doesn’t look inexpensive. 
  • But MCAP/BV and MCAP/TBV are the same. 
  • This leads the astute investor to see if the company owns some juicy tangible asset like land that’s carried on the balance sheet at a tiny, decades-old purchase price. 
  • Will the company sell the land for cash? 
  • Will that cash be excess? 
  • If so, all of the price metrics could plunge. That’s the kind of useful thinking that the dead metrics tease out.

#The first step is to understand a business and the second step is to find it to be good; then valuation

Putting forth my benchmarks so bluntly—8, 7, 3, and 3—is a little dangerous and potentially misleading.

It’s dangerous because it could be interpreted to mean that it’s OK to cut right to valuation without first understanding a business and seeing if it’s good.  Many investors do that. And it can work. But with that approach mine are not the benchmarks to use.





Summary

Inexpensiveness can be detected with four different price metrics:
1. Times free cash flow (MCAP/FCF)
2. Enterprise value to operating income (EV/OI)
3. Price to book (MCAP/BV)
4. Price to tangible book value (MCAP/TBV)




Saturday, 29 April 2017

Primary aim of management is to increase the book value and the market value of the company.

The primary aim of management is to increase




Book Value

Book value (shareholders' equity on the company's balance sheet) is calculated as total assets less total liabilities.

It reflects the historical operating and financing decisions made by the company.

Management can directly influence book value (e.g., by retaining net income).


Market Value

However, management can only indirectly influence a company's market value.

Market value of a company is primarily determined by investors' expectations about the about, timing and uncertainty of the company's future cash flows

A company may increase its book value by retaining net income, but it will only have a positive effect on the company's market value if investors expect the company to invest its retained earnings in profitable growth opportunities.

If investors believe that the company has a significant number of cash flow generating investment opportunities coming through, the market value of the company's equity will exceed its book value.



Price to book ratio (market to book ratio)

A useful ratio to evaluate investor's expectations about a company is the price to book ratio.

If a company has a price to book ratio that is greater than industry average, it suggests that investors believe that the company has more significant future growth opportunities than its industry peers.

It may not be appropriate to compare price to book ratios of companies in different industries because the ratio also reflects investors' growth outlook for the industry itself.


Accounting Return on Equity

An important measure used by investors to evaluate the effectiveness of management in increasing the company's book value is accounting return on equity.



Read also:  https://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2025/12/an-overview-of-core-objectives-of.html

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Market capitalization versus Enterprise Value




Market capitalization = What the equity of the company is worth.

Enterprise value = What the company (or company's asset) is worth.

Monday, 5 March 2012

Definition of 'Market Capitalization'

Definition of 'Market Capitalization'
The total dollar market value of all of a company's outstanding shares. Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying a company's shares outstanding by the current market price of one share. The investment community uses this figure to determine a company's size, as opposed to sales or total asset figures.

Frequently referred to as "market cap".

Investopedia explains 'Market Capitalization'
If a company has 35 million shares outstanding, each with a market value of $100, the company's market capitalization is $3.5 billion (35,000,000 x $100 per share).

Company size is a basic determinant of asset allocation and risk-return parameters for stocks and stock mutual funds. The term should not be confused with a company's "capitalization," which is a financial statement term that refers to the sum of a company's shareholders' equity plus long-term debt.

The stocks of large, medium and small companies are referred to as large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap, respectively. Investment professionals differ on their exact definitions, but the current approximate categories of market capitalization are:


Large Cap: $10 billion plus and include the companies with the largest market capitalization.
Mid Cap: $2 billion to $10 billion
Small Cap: Less than $2 billion


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp?partner=TOD03&utm_source=22&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=TOD-3/5/2012#ixzz1oFXiR874

Friday, 23 April 2010

How much should you pay for a business? Valuing a company (4)

Market capitalisation

The value of a company can be ascertained by multiplying the number of issued shares by the current share price. This is known as market capitalisation.

A case for asset stripping? 
  • The concept of asset stripping is to buy out a company's shares for less than the value of the assets and then to sell these at a profit. 
  • This is why company directors get worried when their share price falls too low!


Also read:

Valuing a company (1)