Showing posts with label When to buy a stock?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label When to buy a stock?. Show all posts

Sunday 1 July 2012

Fisher's advice: Don't quibble over eighths and quarters.



After extensive research, you've found a company that you think will
prosper in the decades ahead, and the stock is currently selling at a
reasonable price. Should you delay or forgo your investment to wait
for a price a few pennies below the current price?

Fisher told the story of a skilled investor who wanted to purchase
shares in a particular company whose stock closed that day at $35.50
per share. However, the investor refused to pay more than $35. The
stock never again sold at $35 and over the next 25 years, increased
in value to more than $500 per share. The investor missed out on a
tremendous gain in a vain attempt to save 50 cents per share.
Even Warren Buffett is prone to this type of mental error. Buffett
began purchasing Wal-Mart many years ago, but stopped buying
when the price moved up a little. Buffett admits that this mistake
cost Berkshire Hathaway shareholders about $10 billion. Even the
Oracle of Omaha could have benefited from Fisher's advice not to
quibble over eighths and quarters.

http://news.morningstar.com/classroom2/course.asp?docId=145662&page=4&CN=COM

Sunday 24 June 2012

Factors influencing Decisions: A Quest for the proper course of Decision-making in Share-investments


Factors influencing Decisions:

A Quest for the proper course of Decision-making in Share-investments

It has been seen for a long time that human being is not always rational and his decisions are not always objective. For instance, if one watches share market, technically the price of a stock should be reflection of its P/E, P/CF & P/BV values, but such is not the case most of times, because the prices of indices are also governed by various aspect and factors of human mindset- expectations, sentiments and excitement to name a few.
This unpredictability of human behavior has led to emergence of a new field in psychology termed as ‘Behavioral Finance’. Behavioral Finance is the study of roles of behavioral factors in the field of finance, especially investment
It is well-known fact that intelligence is one of the important factors, besides hard work and perseverance for achieving success in life. It is generally expected from an intelligent individual to perceive and understand situation properly, think rationally and reason out everything, before making any decision. Clarity of goal, a well-thought strategy to achieve the same, moderate level of motivation, a disciplined behavior with flexibility to reassess the strategies with new developments is certain other requirements to achieve success. This is applied everywhere, in all decisions and goals including individual’s investment decisions as well.
But since human beings do not live in isolation, therefore there are other factors as well which influence his interpersonal relations, and consequently his decisions. Rationality in a man’s decisions or behavior is not always seen as to be expected from them. For instance, people do make different decisions in the two similar situations or behave similarly in two different situations depending upon their emotive state of mind. Thus, emotion plays a vital role in influencing his behavior and decisions. This becomes more apparent in case of investment-related decisions when taken in relation to the share market.
But debate does not end just here. Human beings are not just born for investment; they have other things to do as well. There are numerous occasions when people make mistakes in investment-decisions mostly under the influence of emotions and stress. It is not possible for a person to be totally immune to his emotions, but once he is aware of the risks involved with emotional instability, one can limit the losses. In this context, fear and greed are the most well-known emotions. There is tendency in human-beings to make more money in short time and this tends him to invest in share-market, even when it is at boom. So when market is bearish, the emotion of fear replaces greed. Human-beings love profit, but hate loss even more. A slightly negative indication brings in a lot of negative emotions and consequently, fear comes in. Initially, investor holds position (while rationally, if he wants to quit, he should book losses at that time only) and once the market’s bottoming out tendency to quit gets bigger (though if investor has been rational, he should have waited for a little longer duration and should have stuck to his position). In this way, it would not be wrong to say that not only fear and greed have negative effect on rational thinking, but they also have adverse effects on the long-term strategies of individual. These two unfortunate passions bring in impulsiveness in the individual’s character and continue to press him to take irrational decisions.
Further, Defense-mechanism of denial used by a person to save his self esteem and his ego are also significant factors which prove dangerous in the long run. An investor is, most of the times, adamant to accept that he has made wrong decision. So, he sticks to his decision and end up holding his loosing position longer than what should have been. The anticipation of ‘being wrong’ by any investor, cuts his losses and enables him to take decisions which help him to recover the loss.
Another aspect of Defense-mechanism of denial is its effect on analytical reasoning. Under emotional state of denial, an individual perceives selectively. He tends to emphasize data and information which confirm his position and viewpoint. It also restricts the individual to rationally analyze any new adverse information. Sometimes, it also generates tendency to overemphasize any subtle good indicator and underemphasize the bad indicators, and so, compel the investor to continue with the loosing position, thus aggravating loses.
These factors always influence the decisions of an individual, but the degree of their influence differs. Now, it depends on the individual how he (or she) manipulates these factors for profit. A good investor is one who not only comes out of loss by applying logical thinking but also makes it profitable one. Moreover, one should not stick to his decisions, if situations have changed. The people with low self-esteem and low EQ stick with their decision and apply defense mechanism. False impression of hope leads them to further losses. They even set aside the direction of necessary indicators.
So, to be a good investor, the proper way to act is not simply to book profit at appropriate time, but also to minimize losses in the adverse situations.
’Never Say Die’

Monday 4 June 2012

Only those who will be sellers of equities in the near future should be happy at seeing stocks rise. Prospective purchasers should much prefer sinking prices.

If I can’t convince you that a market downturn is no reason to panic, maybe the world’s greatest investor can. In his 1997 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Warren Buffett wrote:

A short quiz: If you plan to eat hamburgers throughout your life and are not a cattle producer, should you wish for higher or lower prices for beef? Likewise, if you are going to buy a car from time to time but are not an auto manufacturer, should you prefer higher or lower car prices? These questions, of course, answer themselves.


But now for the final exam: If you expect to be a net saver during the next five years, should you hope for a higher or lower stock market during that period? Many investors get this one wrong. Even though they are going to be net buyers of stocks for many years to come, they are elated when stock prices rise and depressed when they fall. In effect, they rejoice because prices have risen for the “hamburgers” they will soon be buying. This reaction makes no sense. Only those who will be sellers of equities in the near future should be happy at seeing stocks rise. Prospective purchasers should much prefer sinking prices.

The next time the stock market takes a tumble, remember Buffett’s advice. And then go out and buy yourself some hamburgers!

Monday 16 April 2012

Value investing – When to Sell or Hold?

A good discussion on when to sell in another blog.

------

12:30 pm
April 10, 2012

matthew

Member
posts 13
9
Yes, I did this on Aeropostale. Approximately a 32% gain I got on that bad boy.
Reasons I sold, it had trouble getting past $21-$22, and then Barclay's raised there price target to $25 so more investors bought and price went up a bit. I took this chance and sold it, and it has now went back down after today -5%. Keep in mind that I sold it early basically because my intrinsic value was around $23 and I figured i'd rather sell now than risk more just for a small additional gain.

If I had not sold it then I would have been stopped out as during the price consilidation period I put in a stop loss @ $21
10:55 am
April 10, 2012

Jae Jun

Admin
posts 1408
8
do any of you sell after a big fast run up even though it is below intrinsic value?
6:29 am
April 1, 2012

nell

Member
posts 88
7
Some reasons to sell..


1. intrinsic value < price -> no margin of safety
2. business quality goes south, management issues etc.
3. better opportunity


One good reason to buy more is when market tanks but intrinsic value of your specific company keeps growing..

Best wishes,
Nell
10:58 am
March 31, 2012

BugMan

New Member
posts 2
6
I'm fairly new to this, and I, too, see selling as the hardest part.

One thing i've thought of that makes it easier is compare your current holdings to what else is out there. If are holding onto a good company, and you figure it has the potential to go up 12% per year, but you see other companies out there that have the potential to go up 25% per year, then sell your current stock and buy the other ones. It's not that the old company isn't good — it is — it's just that there are better deals out there.
8:03 am
February 27, 2012

gstyle

Member
posts 4
5
I am fairly new to value investing so I find it good to know other have had similar thoughts to my own!
2:17 am
February 25, 2012

Jae Jun

Admin
posts 1408
4
selling is defnitely harder than buying.
One of my weak points as well. If I had a partner, I'd find someone who was better at selling than buying. It would be a great combination.

But to sell, you would have to re value a company regularly.
If there isn't much upside to intrinsic value, then I'm willing to sell at 10% below intrinsic value rather than hanging on.
Companies like GRVY, I am happy to hold even if I'm up 100%.
8:17 pm
February 22, 2012

jalleninvest
Coronado, CA

Member
posts 22
3
Post edited 8:20 pm – February 22, 2012 by jalleninvest
G.raham came up with the 50% or two years towards the end of his life, in that interview that is bandied around the internet some. I am not at all sure that he practiced that in the Graham Newman closed end fund he ran. In one case, he did not, and that was GEICO which they bought half of in 1947 or 1948. They ended up having to distribute the shares to the shareholders of the fund, and it increased 54,000 per cent or something like that. Many became multimillionaires, quite a feat back then.
Walter Schloss, who died the past weekend at age 95, talked about selling. According to him that was the hardest part of this business, trying to figure out when to sell. He didn't like paying short term income tax rates and tried to hold stocks for a number of years. He commented ruefully several times about buying at $30, selling at $50 and watching the stock go to $200, etc. He recommended a new company to Graham that had wonderful prospects. Graham turned it down, saying it wasn't their kind of deal. It was Xerox, of course, but Schloss said Graham would have sold it at a double anyway and missed out on the big increase.

If it was easy, everybody would do it!
9:23 am
February 21, 2012

Graeme
Austin, Texas

Member
posts 162
2
Yeah, this is always a fun question.

For me what I do is I break up my holdings into different categories. For example, I have holdings that I bought at a good (not great) but good price, but they pay me dividends, and if they keep acting as they have for years, they should be increasing my dividends every year. I get a bit of return on the stock price increase, but a great return over many years with the dividends reinvesting. So my sell thesis on these guys is pretty firm: as in, I wont easily do it.

But then I have holdings that I would consider a deep value: selling at a deep discount to book value, or below NCAV or in a really beat up industry. These are the shares that I have a target price for: as in, I will sell when they hit that specific price. There is not a whole lot that would change my mind and make me hold on to it longer. And sometimes that target price is 50% above my purchase, 100% or even more.

So you need to judge for yourself whether the business you bought shares in is now fairly priced at it's 50% gain or if it still has room to go.
4:33 am
February 21, 2012

gstyle

Member
posts 4
1
Hi,

I was pondering the concepts of selling a value stock or holding it for longer. I understand that Ben Graham had a strict rule of selling after a 50% increase or after two years, whichever came first.

A stock brought at value brings the 50% gain, but if this stock is in a strong company with good prospects for the future, should it still be sold? At this point, do you make a decision to strictly adhere to Ben Grahams teachings or evolve to be more like Buffett in buying a good company at discount and holding it for a long time?

If the company in question was a 'cigar butt' then selling after its gain seems more obvious than for a value stock in a good company.

Thoughts / comments
No Tags
Page: 1

-----

http://www.oldschoolvalue.com/blog/forum/value-investing/value-investing-sell-or-hold/#p4033

Thursday 8 March 2012

Warren Buffett: Game Pressure


Game pressure

"The stock market is a no-called-strike game. You don't have to swing at everything--you can wait for your pitch. The problem when you're a money manager is that your fans keep yelling, 'Swing, you bum!'"


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-quotes-on-investing-2010-8?op=1#ixzz1oXGjSl1y

Warren Buffett: The right moment to strike


"The best thing that happens to us is when a great company gets into temporary trouble...We want to buy them when they're on the operating table."

The right moment to strike
Source: Businessweek, 1999


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/warren-buffett-quotes-on-investing-2010-8#the-right-moment-to-strike-14#ixzz1oXBp6ldD

Sunday 4 March 2012

The investor with a portfolio of sound stocks should expect their prices to fluctuate


The investor with a portfolio of sound stocks should expect their prices to fluctuate and should

  • neither be concerned by sizable declines 
  • nor become excited by sizable advances. 

He should always remember that market quotations are there for his convenience,

  • either to be taken advantage of or 
  • to be ignored. 

He should never 

  • buy a stock because it has gone up or 
  • sell one because it has gone down. 

He would not be far wrong if this motto read more simply: “Never buy a stock immediately after a substantial rise or sell one immediately after a substantial drop.”

When to Buy? When Not to Buy? It is far from certain that the typical investor should regularly hold off buying until low market levels appear.


It is far from certain that the typical investor should regularly hold off buying until low market levels appear, because

  • this may involve a long wait, 
  • very likely the loss of income, and 
  • the possible missing of investment opportunities. 
On the whole it may be better for the investor to do his stock buying whenever he has money to put in stocks, except when the general market level is much higher than can be justified by well-established standards of value. 

If he wants to be shrewd he can look for the ever-present bargain opportunities in individual securities.

It is far from certain that the typical investor should regularly hold off buying until low market levels appear


It is far from certain that the typical investor should regularly hold off buying until low market levels appear, because

  • this may involve a long wait, 
  • very likely the loss of income, and 
  • the possible missing of investment opportunities. 
On the whole it may be better for the investor to do his stock buying whenever he has money to put in stocks, except when the general market level is much higher than can be justified by well-established standards of value. 

If he wants to be shrewd he can look for the ever-present bargain opportunities in individual securities.

Saturday 18 February 2012

Buying: Leave Room to Average Down

The single most crucial factor in trading is developing the appropriate reaction to price fluctuations.  Investors must learn to resist:
  • fear, the tendency to panic when prices are falling, and 
  • greed, the tendency to become overly enthusiastic when prices are rising.  

One half of trading involves learning how to buy.
  • In my view, investors should usually refrain from purchasing a "full position" (the maximum dollar commitment they intend to make) in a given security all at once.  
  • Those who fail to heed this advice may be compelled to watch a subsequent price decline helplessly, with no buying power in reserve.  
  • Buying a partial position leaves reserves that permit investors to "average down," lowering their average cost per share, if prices decline.  

Evaluating your own willingness to average down can help you distinguish prospective investments from speculations.  
  • If the security you are considering is truly a good investment, not a speculation, you would certainly want to own more at lower prices.  
  • If, prior to purchase, you realize that you are unwilling to average down, then you probably should not make the purchase in the first place.  
  • Potential investments in companies that are poorly managed, highly leveraged, in unattractive businesses, or beyond understanding may be identified and rejected.

Sunday 12 February 2012

Waiting for the Right Pitch


For a value investor a pitch must not only be in the strike zone, it must be in his "sweet spot."  Results will be best when the investor is not pressured to invest prematurely.  There may be times when the investor does not lift the bat from his shoulder, the cheapest security in an overvalued market may still be overvalued.  You wouldn't want to settle for an investment offering a safe 10 percent return if you thought it very likely that another offering an equally safe 15 percent return would soon materialize.

An investment must be purchased at a discount from underlying worth.  This makes it a good absolute value.  Being a good absolute value alone, however, is not sufficient for investors must choose only the best absolute values among those that are currently available.  A stock trading at one-half of the underlying value may be attractive, but another trading at one-fourth of its worth is the better bargain.  This dual discipline compounds the difficulty of the investment task for value investors compared with most others.

Value investors continually compare potential new investments with their current holdings in order to ensure that they own only the most undervalued opportunities available.  Investors should never be afraid to reexamine current holdings as new opportunities appear, even if that means realizing losses on the sale of current holdings.  In other words, no investment should be considered sacred when a better one comes along.

Sometimes dozens of good pitches are thrown consecutively to a value investor. In panicky markets, for example, the number of undervalued securities increases and the degree of undervaluation also grows. In buoyant markets, by contrast, both the number of undervalued securities and their degree of undervaluation declines. When attractive opportunities are plentiful, value investors are able to sift carefully through all the bargains for the ones they find most attractive. When attractive opportunities are scarce, however, investors mus t exhibit great self-discipline in order to maintain the integrity of the valuation process and limit the price paid. Above all, investors must always avoid swinging at bad pitches.




Tuesday 2 February 2010

The Simplest Stock Buy-Sell Decision Rules

http://stockmarket.globalthoughtz.com/index.php/stock-buy-sell-decision-rule/

People gain from stock market because stock market does not fully reflect a stock’s “real” value. After all, why would we all are doing stock market analysis if the stock prices were always correct? In financial jargon, this true value is known as the intrinsic value.

For example, let’s say that a company’s stock was trading at $40. After doing extensive homework on the company, you determine that it really is worth $50. In other words, you determine the intrinsic value of the firm to be $50. This is clearly relevant because an investor wants to buy stocks that are trading at prices significantly below their estimated intrinsic value.

The comparison between market price and intrinsic value helps to make decisions regarding the buying or selling of a particular share.

The following notes show the comparison, decision and reason:

1 Market price < Intrinsic value
e.g. $ 50 < $ 60
  • Under- priced
  • Buy
  • Because the market price increases to meet the value and we can gain from the price rise.

2 Market price > Intrinsic value
e.g. $ 40 > $ 30
  • Over- priced
  • Sell
  • Because the market price falls to meet its value and we can avoid the loss by selling the share now.

3 Market price = Intrinsic value Correctly
e.g. $ 20 = $ 20 priced
  • No action
  • Because it is correctly priced and the price is not expected to change.
  • Therefore there is no profit likely to be made from buying or selling the share.


4 Market price almost equal to Intrinsic value
e.g. $ 40 is almost equal to $ 42
  • No action
  • Because the difference in the value and price can not offset the transaction cost and we can incur losses.


The big unknowns are:

1) You don’t know if your estimate of intrinsic value is correct; and
2) You don’t know how long it will take for the intrinsic value to be reflected in the marketplace.


Thursday 28 January 2010

When to Buy, When to Sell: Value Investors Buy too Soon and Sell too Soon

The notion that an investor can buy a stock that has reached the bottom of its fall is a fantasy.  No one can accurately predict tops, bottoms, or anything in between. 

More often than not, value investors will start to buy a stock on the way down.  The disappointments or reduced expectations that have made it cheap are not going away anytime soon, and here will still be owners of the stock who haven't yet given up when the value investor makes an initial puchase.  If it is toward the end of the year, then selling to take advantage of tax losses can drive the price even more.  Because they are aware that they are - to use the industry cliche - catching a falling knife, value investors are likely to try to scale into a position, buying it in stages. 
  • For some, such as Warren Buffett, that may not be so easy.  Once the word is out that Berkshire Hathaway is a buyer, the stock shoots up in price. 
  • Graham himself, Walter Schloss recounts, confronted this problem.  He divulged a name to a fellow investor over lunch; by the time he was back in the office, the price had risen so much that he could not buy more and still maintain his value discipline. 
  • This is one of the reasons why the Schlosses limit their conversations.

Still, when asked to name the mistake he makes most frequently, Edwin Schloss confesses to
  • buying too much of the stock on the initial purchase and
  • not leaving himself enough room to buy more when the price goes down. 
If it doesn't drop after his first purchase, then he has made the right decision. 
  • But the chances are against him. 
  • He often does get the opportunity to average down - that is, to buy additional shares at a lower price. 
  • The Schlosses have been in the business too long to think that the stock will now oblige them and only rise in price. 
Investing is a humbling profession, but when decades of positive results confirm the wisdom of the strategy, humility is tempered by confidence.

Value investors buy too soon and sell too soon, and the Schlosses are no exceptions. 
  • The cheap stocks generally get cheaper. 
  • When they recover and start to improve, they reach a point at which they are no longer bargains. 
  • The Schlosses start to sell them to investors who are delighted that the prices have gone up. 
  • In many instances, they will continue to rise, sometimes dramatically, while the value investor is searching for new bargains. 
  • The Schlosses bought the invetment bank Lehman Brothers a few years ago aat $15 a share, below book value.  When it reached $35, they sold out.  A few years later it had passed $130.  Obviously that last $100 did not end up in the pockets of value investors. 
  • Over the years, they have had similar experiences with Longines-Wittnauer, Clark Oil, and other stocks that moved from undervalued through fair valued to overvalued without blinking. 
  • The money left on the table, to cite yet another investment cliche, makes for a good night's sleep.

The decision to sell a stock that has not recovered requires more judgement then does selling a winner.  At some point, everyone throws in the towel. 
  • For value investors like the Schlosses, the trigger will generally be a deterioration in the assets or the earnings power beyond what they had initially anticipated. 
  • The stock may still be cheap, but the prospects of recovery have now started to fade. 
  • Even the most tolerant investor's patience can ultimately be exhausted
  • There are always other places to invest the money. 
  • Also, a realized loss has at least some tax benefits for the partners, whereas the depressed stock is just a reminder of a mistake.

Footnote: 
Over the entire 45 year period from 1956 through 2000, Schloss and his son Edwin, who joined him in 1973, have provided their investors a compounded return of 15.3% per year. 

For the nine and a half years that Walter Schloss worked for Ben Graham and for some years after he left to run his own partnership, he was able to find stocks selling for less than two thirds of working capital. But sometime after 1960, as the Depressin became a distant memory, those opportunites generally disappeared. Today, companies that meet that requirement are either so burdened by liabilities or are losing so much money that their future is in jeopardy. Instead of a margin of safety, there is an aura of doubt.

Friday 22 January 2010

Investors buy stocks in order to sell them at a profit in the future

Investors buy stocks for a number of reasons, many of which are ill-advised. 

From purely an investment perspective, there are only 2 reasons to buy common stocks.

1.  True equities investing consist of identifying those companies with stocks undervalued in terms of future earning power and buying them now because the projected earnings per share (EPS) stream is expected to produce dividends.  So the first objective is dividend income. 

2.  The second objective is capital appreciation.  Growth in price tends to occur over time
  • if the fortunes (fundamentals) of the underlying company improve,
  • if interest rates do not move sharply higher (squeezing price/earnings ratio [P/Es], and
  • if market psychology moves from negative to neutral or positive.

To be successful a transaction requires both buying and selling, since both are required before a transaction's final result is established. 

Many published books dealing with stock market investing in any form focus overwhelmingly on the buying transaction only and neglect the sell side of the equation almost completely. 

Selling may not be exciting, and assuredly it is a narrower topic, but it is absolutely necessary and has its own very interesting twists and curiosities.

Thursday 21 January 2010

Buying when the price is right.

When you have a good idea, make sure you bet big.  At other times, don't bother.  Enjoy the things you like, stay inactive if you must.


Just thinking of an analogous situation.  You have been eyeing the house in a neighbourhood.  The house is up for sale, priced at $800,000.  It has been in the market for some time.  The other houses in the neighbourhood had previously been transacted for any price between $600,000 and $800,000.


You have inspected the house and you estimated the fair price for the house based on your assessment to be  $650,000.


Suddenly the economy turned bad.  More houses were up for sale in the neighbourhood.  The prices started to fall.  A house was priced $700,000.  Two months later, another house was in the market for  $730,000.  Then another for $750,000.   The sellers were not keen to lower the prices by much from the quoted price. 


More hardships hit the economy and the community.  No new houses were up for sale, but the buyers literally were not visible.  The prices quoted previously came down, but not by much, except one.  This one house was priced at $600,000 for a quick sale.  The seller was making an urgent sale to obtain cash for various reasons. 


And what did you do?  You waited hoping that the price would drop further.  Perhaps, the seller might sell at $570,000.  You waited for the seller to agree.  You waited. 


Then the news came, the house was sold to another for $600,000.  And how did you feel?  You felt you have missed out on a good deal.  For the next 5 years, the houses in the region never reached this price.  All the houses were priced or transacted around $700,000.


It is difficult, perhaps, close to impossible to buy at the bottom.  There are bargains when the market is on the way down and also on the way up.  The ability to value an asset is important.  As long as the price is below the "intrinsic value" and given an appropriate margin of safety for the risks appropriate for the particular asset, you can buy with conviction. 


Isn't this scenario applicable to buying shares? 


Don't wait for the best price on the way down (Will you ever know when or what will be the lowest price, other than retrospectively?)  or  only pick buy stocks after the prices have swung up from an obvious bottom (Can you predict the short-term volatilties?  The possibilities of the prices swinging up and down over a short period cannot be predicted?  Did you buy when the market swung up from the bottom of March 09, or did you wait thinking that the rally may not be sustainable and the market might go down further?)


Often the shrewd investors wish to buy good quality stocks cheap?  When the prices dropped, some waited hoping for a bigger bargain.  Then the price swung upwards, and that momentary opportunity was lost.  Of course, the consolation is that there will always be another bargain the next time around.


Keeping a proportion of your wealth in cash is always a good thing.  When the opportunities to buy bargains present (and this is always a certainty in the stock market, though perhaps, only about less than 5 times a year), you can then take a big bet.  And here is the point:  Buy when the price is already at a significant bargain to your "fair or intrinsic value".  Once that price is there, buy and buy and buy.  You have all the reasons to buy as you are already buying with a margin of safety to the "intrinsic value."   Of course, if the price dropped further, you can buy more. 


However, be prepared to see the price going further downwards - market prices often overshoot on the way down (and up).  Have conviction in your valuation (assuming you have done the homeworks).  Be patient.  Be very patient.  Be prepared to hold the stock for 2, 3 or 5 years  to realise this objective.  Short term price changes can be volatile and unpredictable.  Provided that you bought only good quality stocks at reasonable or bargain prices, you should, given time and patience, eventually realise a prospective gain.


The importance of only buying good quality stocks cannot be overemphasized.  These are the stocks with good businesses that will over time build value.  These values will eventually be reflected in their share prices.  Even if the prices were to drop below your buying price, given time, the business will generate value pushing the price back to your buying price.


As Benjamin Graham taught, it is not easy to profit consistently by timing the buying. However, one can have high probability of profiting by buying good quality stocks based on price - always buying below the intrinsic value with a margin of safety.




Footnote:


Warren Buffett called the bottom of the market only a few occasions in his long investing career.
  • On one occasion, the market continued to go down further for 3 years after his call.
  • In the recent severe bear market, he called to buy in October 2008. The market continued its downtrend to bottom in March 2009. Those who bought in October 2008 would have to hold on to losses soon after they bought. However, when the market rebounded from the lows of March 2009, and assuming they have held onto their investments to now, they would have made substantial gains to-date.


Tuesday 12 January 2010

Focus on future growth of the company

When we are looking at stock prices, we are not focussing on this quarter's earnings but on the company's future growth.

Friday 11 December 2009

When to invest in stocks?

So make sure you do what everyone else will do before they do it.

When to Invest in Stocks?

 
Answer to this question is very very short.  NOW!

 
So when to invest in stocks?

 
Invest when you will get the most stocks for your money!

 
http://www.sayeconomy.com/when-to-invest-in-stocks/



But back to our economic cycles. I will now try to explain economic growth cycles through movements of stocks.

Let’s start our story when the prices are low. For example Company X has its stock value of €100 for one stock.
  • The price is very low so many people start buying.
  • Because everyone is buying the price goes up.
  • And because price is going up and up and up more and more people are buying.
  • This is a positive growth part of the cycle.

But as everyone could guess this cannot go on forever.
  • Sooner or later people are happy with what they have earned from stocks and they start selling.
  • And when one of the big stock investors sell their share, the stock price drops.
  • Of course it doesn’t drop for much but it drops enough that more people get scared.
  • Once more people get scared those people sell as well because they’re trying to protect their investment.
  • That then cause that the price drops a little bit more and once the price drops a little bit more and more people get scared, more people sell and price drops a little bit more, again more people get scared and so on and so on.
  • As you might have figured it out already we have entered the negative economic growth part of the cycle.
  • The prices are dropping and dropping and dropping and this is what we are looking right now on our socks every day.

However the good news is that the economy is not just one cycle. There is whole bunch of economic growth cycles and that cycle that is going on at the moment will end sooner or later as well.
  • The prices are going down and once they’re down enough people decide to buy again.
  • Once one of the bigger investors decide that the price is low enough to buy and buys a big share of stocks the price goes up a little bit.
  • That is a signal for smaller investors that the cycle has turned and the time of positive economic growth is coming.
 
Because many investors are now expecting that the prices will go up they start buying stocks.
  • And as everyone knows when a lot of people are buying stocks prices of stocks are going up.
  • Because prices are going up more and more people are buying stocks.
  • That then causes that prices are going up a little bit more and as you have noticed we are again in the part of the cycle of positive economic growth.
  • Our cycle has ended and the new one has began.

 
I hope I managed to explain the logic of economic growth cycles. The most important thing to know about economic growth cycles is that when investing you must not do what everyone else is doing. Because once everyone else is doing it there is not much time left before the whole cycle will change and turn around. So make sure you do what everyone else will do before they do it. That will give you a head start and a chance to earn lots and lots of money.

Economic Growth Cycle
http://www.sayeconomy.com/economic-growth-cycle/

Sunday 15 November 2009

When to Buy and Sell Stocks

Sound stock decisions should be made on the basis of thorough company knowledge, not just on the basis of the price of the stock. A rising price most of the times means that the time to sell the stock is nearing. On the other hand, a falling price may signal that the time to purchase stocks is coming.

http://www.stock-market-investors.com/stock-strategies-and-systems/when-to-buy-and-sell-stocks.html

Wednesday 5 August 2009

When to buy a stock?

In trying to decide when to buy a stock, an investor has to take into consideration several factors:-

  1. How does the present price compare with the historical prices?
  2. How does the price trend compare with its earnings and dividend trends?
  3. Is the current EPS and/or DPS unusually high or low?
  4. At the current price, how do the PER and DY compare with the historical PER and DY ranges?
  5. Does the present price look reasonable compared with the historical price or does it look too high or too low?


Ref:
How to use the Stock Performance Guide (SPG)
Stock Performance Guide by Dynaquest Sdn. Bhd.