Showing posts with label rebalancing your portfolio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rebalancing your portfolio. Show all posts

Wednesday 3 February 2010

Good strategies for buying in and for preventing big losses

Strategies for buying in:
  • Lump sum investing
  • Dollar cost averaging
  • Phasing in

Strategies for preventing big losses:
  • Stop loss strategy
  • Rebalancing


Dollar cost averaging and phasing in strategies are useful for those who wish to reduce the risks associated with market timing. 

Regardless of the buying in strategies (lump sum, dollar cost averaging or phasing in), acquisitions should only be done when the stock is available at bargain price or fair price, and certainly never when it is overpriced.

Stop-loss maybe unnecessary for some or many investors if the other risk management ideas are followed.

Value investors with a long term investing time horizon rarely need to use stop loss strategy.   In fact, the drop in price offers an opportunity for the value investor to reduce his cost per share.  This is safe provided he has not made a mistake in his initial assessment of the quality, value and management (QVM) of the stock.

Rebalancing at regular or fixed intervals can be usefully employed to bring his equity portion to a previously determined set proportion of his asset allocations in his portfolio.  This is particularly useful for those who are unable to take big risks (big losses: real or missed profit losses) during the bear or bull markets.

Though theoretically attractive, to be able to profit through rebalancing, near the peak of the bull or near the depth of the bear market, assumes one has the ability to predict (time) the market consistently.  This is of course not possible.

Always keep in perspective the 3 personal factors that are very important in your investing:  time horizon, risk tolerance and investing objectives.

Tuesday 2 February 2010

Two important strategies to help you avoid large losses: STOP LOSSES and REBALANCING

Stop losses and rebalancing are strategies to help you avoid large losses when you invest in equities.

Stop-loss strategy

A stop loss is a specified minimum price at which you will sell a particular share in order to stop the loss.  This is a good strategy with which to protect yourself against large capital losses.  You decide on a percentage loss that you are prepared to take on your investment, and sell when it reaches that percentage.  Stop losses are implemented when the buying of shares (normally not unit trusts) takes place, i.e. an instruction is given by the investor to the stockbroker to buy 1000 shares in XYZ at, say $10,00 and to implement a stop loss at, say $9,00 (the investor perceives XYZ to be a somewhat risky proposition).  The investor has done his sums and comes to the conclusion that the maximum loss he can bear is $1000, hence he limits his potential losses to $1000 by implementing a stop-loss strategy ($1000 divided by 1000 shares = $1.00 per share; $10.00 per share - $1.00 per share = a stop-loss level of $9.00)


Rebalancing

This strategy is best explained by an example.  Following the analysis of your investment profile (time horizon, risk tolerance, and investment objectives), you decide to invest 50% of an amount of $1000 in equities and 50% in other asset classes, such as bonds and cash.

Assume that after a year your equities have decreased to $400 and your other investmens have increased to $800.  This means your original $1000 portfolio is now worth $1200.

Rebalancing means that you adjust your portfolio constituents to get back to a point where half is again invested in equities and half in bonds and cash.  You will therefore have to sell some bonds and buy some equities.  This is an important strategy to keep your portfolio diversified and in line with your time horizon, risk appetite and investment objectives.

Monday 11 January 2010

Stock market: is it time to take profits?

Stock market: is it time to take profits?

The FTSE100 is at a 16-month high leaving many people wondering whether they should take some profits and redirect their money elsewhere.

Published: 10:13PM GMT 10 Jan 2010

Stock markets across the globe have carried on where they left off in 2009 and continue to climb. The FTSE 100 index, for instance, reached a 16‑month high on Tuesday when it broke through the 5,500 level.

Since Britain's blue-chip index fell to a low of 3,512 in March last year, investors have seen a 60pc return on many of their investments. In some cases they will have seen even greater gains if they had invested in overseas funds.

The question now for many people is whether they should take some profits and redirect their money elsewhere. While stock market bulls say that shares will carry on rising, there are fears that the economy could falter again once the Bank of England puts the brakes on quantitative easing and interest rates start to climb.

The Institute of Directors (IoD) said business leaders were pessimistic about prospects for the British economy and warned that "a double-dip, or even a triple-tumble scenario" was a significant risk.

Graeme Leach, the IoD's chief economist, said: "We are very doubtful of a sharp bounce back in 2010. We don't believe sustainable growth will occur. Yes, there could be an occasional spurt of activity, but the next two years look pretty glum."

It is no surprise then that many investment professionals are taking profits and redirecting the gains into other investments.

Oliver Burns, a private client investment manager at Jupiter, is taking profits from some of last year's winners and rotating into higher yielding, larger-cap, defensive stocks.

He said: "We remain positive on the market while interest rates stay low and there are signs of economic recovery, but we believe it has overrun in the short term. In terms of sectors, we are reducing our exposure to corporate bonds, but remain positive on the long-term prospects for emerging markets.

"In our view, stock-picking funds will add significant value over the next year and so we are considering managers such as Derek Stuart, who runs Artemis Special Situations, and Ben Whitmore of Jupiter UK Special Situations, as well as higher yielding funds such as Schroder Income and Artemis Income."

Jonathan Jackson, an equity analyst at Killik & Co, the stockbroker, said: "We would certainly look at taking profits on certain shares that have done well, such as M&S, and reinvest elsewhere in the stock market."

Gary Potter, an investment manager at Thames River, the multi-manager specialist, is in the camp that thinks economic growth is going to struggle and suggests some of the recent rises in commodity stocks are due a pause.

"We have always encouraged people to take profits where they have done well and look to areas that have good outlooks but where share prices have been left behind. For example, mid and smaller-cap stocks have underperformed in this large-cap rally and may offer investors a better home."

But Adrian Shandley, the managing director of Premier Wealth Management, is not convinced that now is the time for investors to exit the stock market altogether. He believes that shares are still undervalued, despite their rise over the past nine months.

"Britain definitely has serious problems, but that doesn't mean the stock market will do badly," he said. "And it often rises after general elections, as they get uncertainty out of the way. Before then, I'd expect markets to be fairly flat."

However, he does believe that investors might want to rejig their portfolios because the recent market rises are likely to mean that they will have greater exposure to certain areas than they need. This could make their portfolios more risky than investors would like.

Broadly, you need to sell enough from sectors that have outperformed to bring your asset allocations back to their original percentages, he said.

For example, you might have split your money at the outset as follows: 30pc UK equities, 30pc bonds, 30pc international equities and bonds, 10pc property. The strong performance of the overseas markets would have boosted their proportion of the portfolio above 30pc, so you need to sell some of your holdings to return the percentage to 30pc.

Mr Shandley added: "Even if you decide not to reduce your exposure to shares, it's a virtual certainty that you should rebalance your portfolio. If emerging markets have stormed away and you remain fully invested in them, a crash will wipe out all your gains. Rebalancing would protect some of those gains."

T Bailey, the investment manager, is in the throes of reducing its exposure to the UK and giving its portfolios a more global feel.

But it is cautious about emerging markets in the short term and is therefore looking to invest in funds in the mature overseas markets such as America (its favoured funds are Axa Framlington American Growth, Neptune US Opportunities and Vanguard US Opportunities).

Philippa Gee of T Bailey said: "We recently reduced the allocation to Japan slightly in favour of the US, using the Legal & General US Index Trust. We also moved a small allocation from the Asia Pacific ex Japan sector to the UK. This went into the iShares FTSE 100 exchange-traded fund (ETF)."

Stephen Ford, an investment manager at Brewin Dolphin, the stockbroker, also said he was becoming more cautious on emerging markets in the short term, given the run they have had. "We have noted that emerging markets are now trading at a 15pc premium to developed markets and therefore a period of consolidation is probable.

"We expect 2010 to be a year for investors to take less equity risk than they carried in 2009 and that conditions will become more volatile. That said, equities should still outperform bonds over the next 12 months."

Whether now is a good time to take profits depends on when you originally invested your money, Mr Shandley pointed out. If, for example, you invested just before the banking crisis you are unlikely to have any profits to take. If you invested last spring or five years ago, on the other hand, then you will have profits to take.

Andrew Merricks of Skerritt Consultants, the Brighton-based independent financial adviser, said investors should think twice about taking profits on investments that produce a decent income, such as corporate and high-yield bonds, because such yields continue to offer a good alternative to the returns on cash and gilts.

Several experts believe that emerging markets – though still a decent long-term play – are favourites for a correction.

Mark Harris of Henderson said: "A number of higher-risk areas such as emerging markets have done extremely well from the lows in March 2009. It is worth taking profits from emerging markets and cyclical sectors such as mining, despite their long-term attractions.

"While we do not believe that the recovery will be derailed, asset pricing conditions are likely to change. For investors who are mindful of shorter-term moves in asset markets, it is worth considering switching some money away from the leading markets and sectors into the laggards."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/6963591/Stock-market-is-it-time-to-take-profits.html

Sunday 10 January 2010

The New Year's No. 1 Investing Tip

The New Year's No. 1 Investing Tip
By Tim Hanson
December 31, 2009

Take a close look at your portfolio and your asset allocation to make sure that it matches your expectations for the next year and beyond. If it doesn't -- and this is the most important part -- then make sure you take the time to rebalance.

What I'm about to tell you could be the most important investing tip you get this year -- even better than if I gave you the name of some race-car growth stock that might double in 2010. But for you to appreciate its importance, I need to tell you two true stories.

True story No. 1
2007 had been a flat year for the market, but we started getting signs at the end of the year that all was not well with the housing market. The S&P took a sharp 10% dive from October to December and newspapers were reporting more and more about a looming "subprime" crisis. Yes, Ben Bernanke cut interest rates, but by the end of 2007, though the scale of the eventual crisis was not yet clear, it was obvious that there were at least a few weak links in the financial sector.

It was at this time that I took a look at my portfolio and realized that I was more than 25% weighted in the financial sector stocks such as Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A), optionsXpress (Nasdaq: OXPS), and International Assets Holding (Nasdaq: IAAC).

Before you call me daft, let me explain how such a thing could happen. First, financial sector stocks were coming out of a period of healthy growth, and my holdings had grown in size from their original positions. Second, financial stocks generally look like attractive buys because of their asset-light business models and high returns on capital. And third, I hadn't paid attention to my overweighting in real-time because these companies weren't operating in the same parts of the financial sector.

Yet overweight position across financials scared me when I saw it at the end of 2007 since my outlook for financials in 2008 wasn't all that rosy.

What happened? I rebalanced my portfolio by selling some of my financial stocks and saved myself a lot of pain as a result.

True story No. 2
Fast-forward to the end of 2008. The entire stock market had dropped nearly 50% and stocks with higher risk profiles -- such emerging markets names -- were down even more than that.

As a consequence, when I looked at my portfolio, I realized I now had less than 10% of my money invested in emerging markets even though I believed countries such as China, India, and Brazil were going to lead the world into recovery in 2009. After all, these countries were still posting positive GDP growth and had attributes -- such as a higher savings rate in China, a younger population in India, and a wealth of natural resources in Brazil -- that seemed like they could better help them survive and perhaps even thrive through the downturn.

So what did I do? I rebalanced my portfolio by selling some U.S. stocks and buying more shares of promising emerging markets names such as America Movil (NYSE: AMX), Mercadolibre (Nasdaq: MELI), China Fire & Security (Nasdaq: CFSG), and Yongye International (Nasdaq: YONG).

As you can see from the returns below, my emerging markets thesis played out as expected and my decision to buy more of those stocks helped make my returns dramatically better than they would have been otherwise.

Stock
2009 Return

America Movil
55%

Mercadolibre
217%

China Fire & Security
103%

Yongye International
425%


The New Year's No. 1 investing tip
Now that you know those two true stories, I hope you can appreciate the importance of taking time at the end of each calendar year to take a close look at your portfolio and your asset allocation to make sure that it matches your expectations for the next year and beyond.

If it doesn't -- and this is the most important part -- then make sure you take the time to rebalance. Not only could rebalancing save you a lot of pain (as it did me in 2008), but it can also help you make a lot more money (as it did me in 2009).

http://www.fool.com/investing/international/2009/12/31/the-new-years-no-1-investing-tip.aspx

Thursday 5 November 2009

Rebalance your portfolio without selling a thing



Rebalance your portfolio without selling a thing

The market's ups and downs mean your portfolio may have strayed way off your target asset mix. Rebalance by putting the $50,000 into asset classes that have fallen in value. You won't have to sell winners, so you reduce transaction costs and potentially minimize your tax bill.

Sunday 18 October 2009

Investors left behind in rally

From The Sunday Times
October 18, 2009

Investors left behind in rally

The market’s stellar rise has eclipsed UK equity funds with fewer than a quarter beating the market since its low in March

Jennifer Hill
The FTSE All-Share has surged 51% from its trough on March 3 while the FTSE 100 is up 48%, after gaining 28 points last week to close at 5,190. But just 101 out of 405 funds (24.9%) have managed to equal or better that, said Morningstar, the data firm.

The average UK equity fund is up 45%, with the worst performer, Manek Growth, managing a mere 15% return.

Some of the biggest names have also lagged the market. Invesco Perpetual High Income, run by Neil Woodford with £8.6 billion invested, has gained 19% since March; the £2.7 billion Newton Income fund managed by Christopher Metcalfe has risen 18%; and Anthony Nutt’s £9 billion Jupiter Income fund is up 35%.

Fund managers have been caught out because they backed the wrong sectors going into the rally. Most had big holdings in “defensive” stocks, such as pharmaceutical firms and utilities, but financials and miners have led the charge, pushing America's Dow Jones through 10,000 on Wednesday.

Michael Hartnett at Merrill Lynch Global Research, said: “Equities remain in a sweet spot. Fears of a double-dip recession have receded, while worries about inflation and rising interest rates are not imminent enough to have prevented an October surge in risk appetite.”

However, advisers say some of the stellar performers, such as commodity stocks, could be in line for a setback. Conversely, the equity income sector — which tends to invest in defensive stocks because they traditionally pay higher than average dividends — could come back into fashion.

Danny Cox at Hargreaves Lansdown, the adviser, said investors should keep faith with popular income funds. He said: “Woodford believes the UK economy is in for a difficult period, so is very focused on defensives. Despite his recent underperformance, if he is right his fund will come good again.” We look at the experts’ tips for the bull market’s next stage:

Take some profits

Most commentators recommend banking some profits from the stocks and sectors that have led the recent rally, ahead of any setback later in the year.

Dirk Wiedmann at Rothschild Private Banking and Trust said: “After an exceptionally strong run, there is a growing danger that risky assets will suffer a setback.”

Kazakhmys, the London-listed metals company, is the market’s top performer since March, soaring 450%, followed by Vedanta, another miner, up 376%. Nick Raynor at The Share Centre said: “The FTSE 350 Mining index plunged 74% from May to December — and the same thing could happen again.” He also recommends selling out of retailers Marks & Spencer and Next, which could struggle amid rising unemployment and a 2.5% increase in Vat to 17.5% on January 1.

Rebalance your portfolio

The rally in miners and financials means many investors will now be taking on more risk than they want to, and they are being urged to review their portfolios.

Say you built a portfolio of 60% equities, 30% bonds and 10% cash. If left for 20 years, that could turn into one with, say, 84% stocks, 13% bonds and 3% cash. If your goals haven’t changed, you need to rebalance it. Doing so every year boosts returns by 16% over a 10-year period, according to Skandia, the investment firm.

As a rule, advisers recommend rebalancing when assets drift 5% or more away from your initial allocation.

Darius McDermott at Chelsea Financial Services, the broker, suggests investors reduce their holdings in some financial stocks — Barclays is the third top-performing share this year, with a 364% surge — and emerging markets, which have powered ahead. The MSCI Emerging Markets index has soared 80% since March 3.

Go for laggards

Defence firm BAE Systems, publisher Reed Elsevier and a string of utilities have grossly underperformed the market since March. Raynor tips National Grid, up only 5.8%, and Scottish & Southern Energy, which has gained only 8.3%.

Diversify overseas

British shares tends to lag other markets in periods of strong growth. Cox likes the Aberdeen Emerging Markets and First State Global Emerging Market Leaders funds, which have big holdings in Brazil, India, Hong Kong and China.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/investment/article6878766.ece

Thursday 28 May 2009

How to employ buy and hold in our overall investing philosophy?

How to employ buy and hold in our overall investing philosophy?

The more you trade, the less well you do. Have a strategy and then let that strategy work.

Warren Buffett often hold stocks for years and years. But not all buy and hold strategists need to follow him.

You can choose to hold a stock for a year and then rebalances your portfolio. By doing so, you are making sure you are not holding stocks that no longer meets your criteria. While you may choose to rebalance annually, you may also rebalance your portfolio more frequently.

You are free to pick a rebalancing period - be it monthly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually. Sticking to this discipline is more important than the decision about which specific period to use.

Keep it Simple and Safe (K.I.S.S): The novice investors might expect someone emerging from a study of the different strategies and the stock market results to come out with some highly complex, esoteric formulas for how to produce the best returns. Instead, it was just the opposite.