Margin of Safety as the Central Concept of Investment – Summary

Investment is most intelligent when it is most businesslike.

• It is amazing to see how many capable businessmen try to operate in Wall Street with complete disregard of all the sound principles through which they have gained success in their own undertakings.
• Yet every corporate security may best be viewed, in the first instance, as an ownership interest in, or a claim against, a specific business enterprise.
• And if a person sets out to make profits from security purchases and sales, he is embarking on a business venture of his own, which must be run in accordance with accepted business principles if it is to have a chance of success.
  
  

The first and most obvious of these principles is, “Know what you are doing – know your business.”

• For the investor this means: Do not try to make “business profits" out of securities – that is, returns in excess of normal interest and dividend income – unless you know as much about security values as you would need to know about the value of merchandise that you proposed to manufacture or deal in.
  

A second business principle: “Do not let anyone else run your business, unless (1) you can supervise his performance with adequate care and comprehensive or (2) you have unusually strong reasons for placing implicit confidence in his integrity and ability.”

• For the investor this rule should determine the conditions under which he will permit someone else to decide what is done with his money.
  

A third business principle: “Do not enter upon an operation – that is, manufacturing or trading in an item – unless a reliable calculation shows that it has a fair chance to yield a reasonable profit.

• In particular, keep away from ventures in which you have little to gain and much to lose.”
• For the enterprising investor this means that his operations from profit should be based not on optimism but on arithmetic.
• For every investor it means that when he limits his return to a small figure – as formerly, at least, in a conventional bond or preferred stock – he must demand convincing evidence that he is not risking a substantial part of his capital.
  

A fourth business rule is more positive: “Have the courage of your knowledge and experience. If you have formed a conclusion from the facts and if you know your judgement is sound, act on it – even though others may hesitate or differ.”

• (You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.)
• Similarly, in the world of securities, courage becomes the supreme virtue after adequate knowledge and a tested judgement are at hand.
  

Fortunately for the typical investor, it is by no means necessary for his success that he bring these qualities to bear upon his program – provided he limits his ambition to his capacity and confines his activities within the safe and narrow path of standard, defensive investment.

• To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results I harder than it looks.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety and Unconventional Investments

Margin of Safety and Unconventional Investments - Extension of the Concept of Investment

Investment can be further distinguished between conventional and unconventional investments.
Conventional investments are appropriate for the typical portfolio.

• Under this heading have always come US government issues and high-grade, dividend-paying common stocks.
• We have added state and municipal bonds for those who will benefit sufficiently by their tax-exempt features.
• Also included are first-quality corporate bonds when, as now, they can be bought to yield sufficiently more than US savings bonds.
  

Unconventional investments are those that are suitable only for the enterprising investor. They cover a wide range.

• The broadest category is that of undervalued common stocks of secondary companies, which we recommend for purchase when they can be bought at two-thirds or less of their indicated value.
• Besides these, there is often a wide choice of medium-grade corporate bonds and preferred stocks when they are selling at such depressed prices as to be obtainable also at a considerable discount from their apparent value.
• In these cases, the average investor would be inclined to call the securities speculative, because in his mind their lack of a first-quality rating is synonymous with a lack of investment merit.
  

-----

1. It is our argument that a sufficiently low price can turn a security of mediocre quality into a sound investment opportunity – provided that the buyer is informed and experienced and that he practices adequate diversification.
2. For, if the price is low enough to create a substantial margin of safety, the security thereby meets our criterion of investment.
3. Our favourite supporting illustration is taken from the field of real-estate bonds.

• In the 1920s, billions of dollars’ worth of these issues were sold at par and widely recommended as sound investments.
• A large proportion had so little margin of value over debt as to be in fact highly speculative in character. In the depression of the 1930s, an enormous quantity of these bonds defaulted their interest, and their price collapsed – in some cases below 1 cents on the dollar.
• At that stage the same advisers who had recommended them at par as safe investments were rejecting them as paper of the most speculative and unattractive type.
• But as a matter of fact, the price depreciation of about 90% made many of these securities exceedingly attractive and reasonably safe – for the true values behind them were four or five times the market quotation.
• (Graham is saying that there is no such thing as a good or bad stock; there are only cheap stocks and expensive stocks. Even the best company becomes a “sell” when its stock price goes too high, while the worst company is worth buying if its stock goes low enough.)
• The fact that the purchase of these bonds actually resulted in what is generally called “a large speculative profit” did not prevent them from having true investment qualities at their low prices.
• The “speculative” profit was the purchaser’s reward for having made an unusually shrewd investment.
• They could properly be called investment opportunities, since a careful analysis would have shown that the excess of value over price provided a large margin of safety.
• Thus, the very class of “fair-weather investments” which we stated above is a chief source of serious loss to naïve security buyers is likely to afford many sound profit opportunities to the sophisticated operator who may buy them at pretty much his own price.
• [Wall Street’s analysts have always tended to call a stock a “strong buy” when its price is high, and to label it a “sell” after its price has fallen – the exact opposite of what Graham (and simple common sense) would dictate.]
• [As he does throughout the book, Graham is distinguishing speculation – or buying on the hope that a stock’s price will keep going up – from investing, or buying on the basis of what the underlying business is worth.]

----

The whole field of “special situations” would come under our definition of investment operations, because the purchase is always predicated on a thoroughgoing analysis that promises a larger realization than the price paid.

Again there are risk factors in each individual case, but these are allowed for in the calculations and absorbed in the overall results of a diversified operation.

----

To carry this discussion to a logical extreme, we might suggest that a defensive investment operation could be set up by buying such intangible values as are represented by a group of “common stock option warrants” selling at historically low prices. (This example is intended as somewhat of a shocker.)

1. The entire value of these warrants rests on the possibility that the related stocks may some day advance above the option price. At the moment they have no exercisable value.
2. Yet, since all investment rests on reasonable future expectations, it is proper to view these warrants in terms of the mathematical chances that some future bull market will create a large increase in their indicated value and in their price.
3. Such a study might well yield the conclusion that there is much more to be gained in such an operation than to be lost and that the chances of an ultimate profit are much better than those of an ultimate loss.
4. If that is so, there is a safety margin present even in this unprepossesing security form.
5. A sufficiently enterprising investor could then include an option-warrant operation in his miscellany of unconventional investments.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety as a Criterion of Investment versus Speculation

Margin of Safety concept can be used to distinguish an investment from a speculation

1. Since there is no single definition of investment in general acceptance, authorities have the right to define it pretty much as they please. Many of them deny that there is any useful or dependable difference between the concepts of investment and of speculation.
2. We think this skepticism is unnecessary and harmful. It is injurious because it lends encouragement to the innate leaning of many people toward the excitement and hazards of stock-market speculation. We suggest that the margin-of-safety concept may be used to advantage as the touchstone to distinguish an investment operation from a speculative one.
3. Probably most speculators believe they have the odds in their favour when they take their chances, and therefore they may lay claim to a safety margin in their proceedings.
4. Each one has the feeling that the time is propitious for his purchase, or that his skill is superior to the crowd’s, or that his adviser or system is trustworthy.
5. But such claims are unconvincing. They rest on subjective judgement, unsupported by any body of favourable evidence or any conclusive line of reasoning.
6. We greatly doubt whether the man who stakes money on his view that the market is heading up or down can ever be said to be protected by a margin of safety in any useful sense of the phrase.
7. By contrast, the investor’s concept of the margin of safety – as developed earlier in this chapter – rests upon simple and definite arithmetical reasoning from statistical data. We believe, also, that it is well supported by practical investment experience.
8. There is no guarantee that this fundamental quantitative approach will continue to show favourable results under the unknown conditions of the future. But, equally, there is no valid reason for pessimism on this score.
9. Thus, in sum, we say that to have a true investment there must be present a true margin of safety.
10. And a true margin of safety is one that can be demonstrated by figures, by persuasive reasoning, and by reference to a body of actual experience.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of safety and the principle of diversification.

1. There is a close logical connection between the concept of a safety margin and the principle of diversification. One is correlative with the other.
2. Even with a margin in the investor’s favour, an individual security may work out badly. For the margin guarantees only that he has a better chance for profit than for loss – not that loss is impossible.
3. But as the number of such commitments is increased the more certain does it become that the aggregate of the profits will exceed the aggregate of the losses. That is the simple basis of the insurance-underwriting business.
4. Diversification is an established tenent of conservative investment.
5. By accepting it so universally, investors are really demonstrating their acceptance of the margin-of-safety principle, to which diversification is the companion.
6. This point may be made more colourful by a reference to the arithmetic of roulette.

• If a man bets $1 on a single number, he is paid $35 profit when he wins – but the chances are 37 to 1 that he will lose. (In “American” roulette, most wheels include 0 and 00 along with numbers 1 through 36, for a total of 38 slots.)
• He has a “negative margin of safety.” In his case, diversification is foolish.
• The more numbers he bets on, the smaller his chance of ending with a profit. If he regularly bets $1 on every number (including 0 and 00), he is certain to lose $2 on each turn of the wheel.
• But suppose the winner received $39 profit instead of $35.
• Then he would have a small but important margin of safety. Therefore, the more numbers he wagers on, the better his chances of gain.
• And he could be certain of winning $2 on every spin by simply betting $1 each on all the numbers.
• (Incidentally, the two examples given actually describe the respective positions of the player and proprietor of a wheel with 0 and 00.)

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to undervalued or bargain stocks.

1. The margin-of-safety idea becomes much more evident when we apply it to the field of undervalued or bargain securities.
2. We have here, by definition, a favourable difference between price on the one hand and indicated or apprised value on the other. That difference is the safety margin.
3. It is available for absorbing the effect of miscalculations or worse than average luck.
4. The buyer of bargain issues places particular emphasis on the ability of the investment to withstand adverse developments.
5. For in most such cases he has no real enthusiasm about the company’s prospects.
6. True, if the prospects are definitely bad the investor will prefer to avoid the security no matter how low the price.
7. But the field of undervalued issues is drawn from the many concerns – perhaps a majority of the total – for which the future appears neither distinctly promising nor distinctly unpromising.
8. If these are bought on a bargain basis, even a moderate decline in the earning power need not prevent the investment from showing satisfactory results. The margin of safety will then have served its proper purpose.


Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to growth stocks.

1. The philosophy of investment in growth stocks parallels in part and in part contravenes the margin-of-safety principle.
2. The growth-stock buyer relies on a expected earning power that is greater than the average shown in the past. Thus he may be said to substitute these expected earnings for the past record in calculating his margin of safety.
3. In investment theory there is no reason why carefully estimated future earnings should be a less reliable guide than the bare record of the past; in fact, security analysis is coming more and more to prefer a competently executed evaluation of the future.
4. Thus the growth-stock approach may supply as dependable a margin of safety as is found in the ordinary investment – provided the calculation of the future is conservatively made, and provided it shows a satisfactory margin in relation to the price paid.
5. The danger in a growth-stock program lies precisely here. For such favoured issues the market has a tendency to set prices that will not be adequately protected by a conservative projection of future earnings. (It is a basic rule of prudent investment that all estimates, when they differ from past performance, must err at least slightly on the side of understatement.)
6. The margin of safety is always dependent on the price paid. It will be large at one price, small at some higher price, nonexistent at some still higher price.
7. If, as we suggest, the average market level of most growth stocks is too high to provide an adequate margin of safety for the buyer, then a simple technique of diversified buying in this field may not work out satisfactorily.
8. A special degree of foresight and judgment will be needed, in order that wise individual selections may overcome the hazards inherent in the customary market level of such issues as a whole.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to common stocks.

The margin of safety concept as applied to “fixed-value investments” can also be carried over into the field of common stocks, but with some necessary modifications.


1. However, the risk of paying too high a price for good-quality stocks – while a real one – is not the chief hazard confronting the average buyer of securities.
2. Observation over many years has taught us that the chief losses to investors come from the purchase of low-quality securities at times of favourable business conditions. The purchasers view the current good earnings as equivalent to “earning power” and assume that prosperity is synonymous with safety.
3. It is in those years that bonds and preferred stocks of inferior grade can be sold to the public at a price around par, because they carry a little higher income return or a deceptively attractive conversion privilege.
4. It is then also, that common stocks of obscure companies can be floated at prices far above the tangible investment, on the strength of two or three years of excellent growth.
5. These securities do not offer an adequate margin of safety in any admissible sense of the term. Coverage of interest charges and preferred dividends must be tested over a number of years, including preferably a period of subnormal business such as in 1970-71. The same is ordinarily true of common-stock earnings if they are to qualify as indicators of earning power.
6. Thus it follows that most of the fair-weather investments, acquired at fair-weather prices, are destined to suffer disturbing price declines when the horizon clouds over – and often sooner than that.
7. Nor can the investor count with confidence on an eventual recovery – although this does come about in some proportion of the cases – for he has never had a real safety margin to tide him through adversity.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to common stocks, when market is pricy.

1. Under 1972 conditions, the market is overpriced for common-stock. “In a typical case”, the earning power (earning yield) is now much less than 9% on the price paid.
2. Let us assume that by concentrating somewhat on the low-multiplier issues among the large companies a defensive investor may now acquire equities at 12 times recent earnings – i.e., with an earnings return of 8.33% on cost.
3. He may obtain a dividend yield of about 4%, and he will have 4.33% of his cost reinvested in the business for his account.
4. On this basis, the excess of stock earning power over bond interest over a ten-year basis would still be too small to constitute an adequate margin of safety.
5. For that reason, we feel that there are real risks now even in a diversified list of sound common stocks.
6. The risks may be fully offset by the profit possibilities of the list; and indeed the investor may have no choice but to incur them – for otherwise he may run an even greater risk of holding only fixed claims payable in steadily depreciating dollars.
7. Nonetheless, the investor would do well to recognize, and to accept as philosophically as he can, that the old package of good profit possibilities combined with small ultimate risk is no longer available to him.


Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to common stocks, under normal market conditions.

1. In common stock bought for investment under normal conditions, the margin of safety lies in an expected earning power considerably above the going rate for bonds.
2. Assume, earning power (earning yield) is 9% on the price, and that the bond rate is 4%; then the stock buyer will have an average annual margin of 5% accruing in his favour. Over a ten-year period the typical excess of stock earning power over bond interest may aggregate 50% of the price paid. This figure is sufficient to provide a very real margin of safety – which, under favourable conditions, will prevent or minimize a loss.
3. In many cases, such reinvested earnings fail to add commensurately to the earning power and value of his stock.
4. If such a margin is present in each of a diversified list of 20 or more stocks, the probability of a favourable result under “fairly normal conditions” becomes very large. That is why the policy of investing in representative common stocks does not require high qualities of insight and foresight to work out successfully.
5. If the purchases are made at the average level of the market over a span of years, the prices paid should carry with them assurance of an adequate margin of safety.
6. The danger to investors lies in concentrating their purchases in the upper levels of the market, or in buying nonrepresentative common stocks that carry more than average risk of diminished earning power.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to common stocks, under depression conditions

There are instances where a common stock may be considered sound because it enjoys a margin of safety as large as that of a good bond.

1. This will occur, for example, when a company has outstanding only common stock that under depression conditions is selling for less than the amount of bonds that could safely be issued against its property and earning power.
2. That was the position of a host of strongly financed industrial companies at the low price levels of 1932-33.
3. In such instances the investor can obtain the margin of safety associated with a bond, plus all the chances of larger income and principal appreciation inherent in a common stock. (The only thing he lacks is the legal power to insist on dividend payments “or else” – but this is a small drawback as compared with his advantages.)
4. Common stocks bought under such circumstances will supply an ideal, though infrequent, combination of safety and profit opportunity.
5. As a quite recent example of this condition, let us mention once more National Presto Industries stock, which sold for a total enterprise value of $43 million in 1972. With its $16 millions of recent earnings before taxes the company could easily have supported this amount of bonds.

Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Margin of Safety concept as applied to “fixed-value investment.”

1. This is essential to the choice of sound bonds and preferred stocks.
2. A railroad should have earned its total fixed charges better than 5 times (before income tax), taking a period of years, for its bonds to qualify as investment-grade issues.
3. This past ability to earn in excess of interest requirements constitutes the margin of safety that is counted on to protect the investor against loss or discomfiture in the event of some future decline in net income.
4. (The margin above charges may be stated in other ways – for example, in the percentage by which revenues or profits may decline before the balance after interest disappears – but the underlying idea remains the same.)
5. The bond investor does not expect future average earnings to work out the same as in the past; if he were sure of that, the margin demanded might be small.
6. Nor does he rely to any controlling extent on his judgment as to whether future earnings will be materially better or poorer than in the past, if he did that, he would have to measure his margin in terms of a carefully projected income account, instead of emphasizing the margin shown in the past record.
7. Here the function of the margin of safety is, in essence, that of rendering unnecessary an accurate estimate of the future.
8. If the margin is a large one, then it is enough to assume that future earnings will not fall far below those of the past in order for an investor to feel sufficiently protected against the vicissitudes of time.
9. The margin of safety for bonds may be calculated, alternatively, by comparing the total value of the enterprise with the amount of debt. (A similar calculation may be made for a preferred-stock issue.)
10. If the business owes $10 million and is fairly worth $30 million, there is room for a shrinkage of two-thirds in value – at least theoretically – before the bondholders will suffer loss. The amount of this extra value, or “cushion,” above the debt may be approximated by using the average market price of the junior stock issues over a period of years.
11. Since average stock prices are generally related to average earning powers, the margin of “enterprise value” over debt and the margin of earnings over charges will in most cases yield similar results.


Ref: Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

Performance of iCap Closed Ended Fund (23.7.09)

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tLGli-bysuYRLMUAtpdhnGg&output=html

Investing in Investment Funds

Chapter 9 - Investing in Investment Funds
Graham basically says that there are three questions you need to answer before investing in any fund.

1. Is there any way by which the investor can assure himself better than average results by choosing the right funds? [...]

2. If not, how can he avoid choosing funds that will give him worse than average results?

3. Can he make intelligent choices between different types of funds - e.g., balanced versus all-stock, open-end versus closed-end, load versus no-load?

Graham states that in general, individuals who invest in balanced funds tend to do better than individuals who invest in individual common stocks. The reason is simple: a person who is not an expert at picking individual stocks and balancing a portfolio is usually better off in the hands of a professional money manager even after the costs.

However (and this is big), Graham largely seems to suggest that the fees in a typical mutual fund are far too high and the time invested in finding a bargain fund (one with good results with limited costs) is well worth the time. He also believes that you should not expect to ever radically beat the market with a fund, and that funds who have astounding short term gains are usually not playing a healthy long-term gain - something that’s been shown over and over again over the history of investing.

Unsurprisingly, Graham isn’t particularly a big cheerleader of traditional mutual funds. One of Graham’s big requirements for investing is that you know exactly what you’re invested in, and by buying into a fund, you cede that control to someone else.

Of course, even if you’re using an index fund strategy, you still need to pay attention to diversification and should not have all of your eggs in one basket. Just because you’re invested with index funds doesn’t mean you shouldn’t balance your portfolio between stocks, bonds, and cash.

Price volatility is usually a bad sign.

Price volatility is usually a bad sign. If a company is experiencing far greater price fluctuations than the market as a whole is seeing, particularly when it alternates between going up rapidly and going down rapidly, avoid the stock. Such events happen only in companies that are either unstable or are involved in something else going on in the market, both of which are good to avoid.

Everything Buffett Needs to Know, He Learned Right Here

Everything Buffett Needs to Know, He Learned Right Here
By Morgan Housel
July 17, 2009


Millions of investors chase Warren Buffett. Tens of thousands attend Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) annual shareholder meetings. Wealthy fans bid millions of dollars to have lunch with him. His appearances on CNBC bring trading floors to a halt. People want to know what he's thinking. Why he's different. What secret has made him so much more successful than anyone else.

What's interesting -- and a little ironic -- is that Buffett has never held back what his secret is. As he recently told PBS:

I read a book, what is it, almost 60 years ago roughly, called The Intelligent Investor and I really learned all I needed to know about investing from that book, and particular chapters 8 and 20 … I haven't changed anything since.

One book. Two chapters. Legendary success.
You'd think such precisely guided advice would draw more attention. Not only has Buffett filtered his success down to one book, he's even listed the two specific chapters on which he built his wisdom. He's making this almost embarrassingly easy for us.

What bits of sage advice do these two chapters -- published in 1949 by Buffett's early mentor Ben Graham -- hold? Here are key points from each one.

Chapter 8: The Investor and Market Fluctuations
Markets go up. Markets go down. Most of us accept this fact until we experience the latter, at which time we throw up our hands and consider the whole thing a sham.

That kind of behavior is what Chapter 8 is all about: dealing with market movements, and how fundamental they are to investing success.

We have a tendency to become confident and invest the most money after stocks have logged big gains, and vice versa -- selling in panic after big drops. Two seconds of logical thought will tell you this isn't rational. Yet we do it over and over again.

Buffett built his success on exploiting the market's movements, rather than following them with lemming-like obedience. He bought companies like Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) when the market wanted nothing to do with them. He then sat on his hands and laughed when companies like Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) and Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) soared during the dot-com boom, ignoring heckles about his technophobic incompetence. It's truly as simple as "being greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy."

Here's how Graham puts it in Chapter 8:

The true investor scarcely ever is forced to sell his shares, and at all other times he is free to disregard the current price quotation. He need pay attention to it and act upon it only to the extent that it suits his book, and no more. Thus the investor who permits himself to be stampeded or unduly worried by unjustified market declines in his holdings is perversely transforming his basic advantage into a basic disadvantage. That man would be better off if his stocks had no market quotation at all, for he would then be spared the mental anguish caused him by other persons' mistakes of judgment.

Chapter 20: Margin of Safety as the Central Concept of Investment
Graham opens Chapter 20 with a potent message:

In the old legend the wise men finally boiled down the history of mortal affairs into the single phrase, 'This too will pass.' Confronted with a like challenge to distill the secret of sound investment into three words, we venture the motto, MARGIN OF SAFETY.

We have an overwhelming urge to expect certainty, but live in a world that is anything but. Forward-looking projections of a stock's value are based on assumptions, prone to wild miscalculations and unforeseen events. And by prone, I mean 100% assured.

There's only one surefire solution to this: Pay far less for stocks than your estimate of value, leaving room for error. That's a margin of safety. It's giving yourself room to be wrong, knowing that you probably will be. Think a company is worth $50 a share? Great. Don't pay more than $25 for it. Think a company could earn $2 per share next year? Great. Set yourself up so you'll profit if it only makes a buck. There has to be a wide range of acceptance between the projected and the potential.

One stock that might epitomize the opposite of a margin of safety is Visa (NYSE: V). Visa is a great company, to be sure, exploiting a global consumer shifting from paper to plastic transactions. But it currently trades at more than 22 times 2009 earnings. My calculations of growth show this is probably what the company is worth if everything goes according to plan.

But what if everything doesn't? What if growth hits a speed bump? What if management drops the ball? What if consumer spending takes a sustained nosedive? What if, what if, what if -- that's the basis of a margin of safety. There has to be sizable room for error.

Moving on
These lessons might seem basic and dull. They are. Yet too many investors fail to implement them. Buffett obviously isn't the only one who's read The Intelligent Investor -- he's simply put its lessons and theories to work in a habitual manner.

Our Motley Fool Inside Value team strives to put these basic values to work with all of its recommendations, which are currently outperforming the market by an average of four percentage points each. To see what we're recommending right now, you can try the service free for 30 days. Click here to get started. There's no obligation to subscribe.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Amazon.com and Berkshire Hathaway are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Berkshire Hathaway, Coca-Cola, and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, and has a disclosure policy.

http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2009/07/17/everything-buffett-needs-to-know-he-learned-right-.aspx

Companies with different EPS GR bought at different prices

Conclusion:

1. Best buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for long haul

2. Good buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a fair price
Held for long haul

3. Good buy:
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for short haul

5. Do not buy
High EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid meantime
Be patient

6. Do not buy
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid



The high CAGR in the early years of the investing period, due to buying at a discount, tended to decline and approach that of the intrinsic EPS GR of the companies over a longer investment time-frame.


http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=thtZJOZYT-iKNP3VPKg9jig&output=html


Chapter 20 - “Margin of Safety” as the Central Concept of Investment
A single quote by Graham on page 516 struck me:

Observation over many years has taught us that the chief losses to investors come from the purchase of low-quality securities at times of favorable business conditions.

Basically, Graham is saying that most stock investors lose money because they invest in companies that seem good at a particular point in time, but are lacking the fundamentals of a long-lasting stable company.

This seems obvious on the surface, but it’s actually a great argument for thinking more carefully about your individual stock investments. If most of your losses come from buying companies that seem healthy but really aren’t, isn’t that a profound argument for carefully studying any company you might invest in?

To map out a course of action and follow it to an end requires courage.

Whatever strategy or strategies you use, the most critical thing in investing is to take a good map with you on your journey and stick to it no matter what. There will be all sorts of distractions along the road to your investment goals. You'll come upon supposed shortcuts that promise to get you where you're going twice as fast. You'll see and hear from all sorts of people who are telling you that they've found a better way to go than the road you're on. Sometimes, you'll even think that your map must be wrong, and that it has you headed in the opposite direction of where you want to go.



But remember, the people who gave you directions - the gurus upon whom some of the strategies are based - are expert mapmakers. They know how to get where you want to go because they've been there before - unlike most of the people who will be telling you to take those shortcuts or alternate routes.



With the map, you have what you need to avoid the obstacles and bad advice along the way, and to do what it takes to beat the market. Remember, while being a good investor is hard, it doesn't have to be complicated. The greatest difficult isn't in the details of stock-picking or portfolio management; you don't have to be a rocket scientist to produce nice returns. No, the hard part will be clearing those psychological and emotional barriers we reviewed, so that you stick to your road map no matter what happens.

If you stick to your roadmap, you should be quite happy with where you end up.

Investing Principle 6: Stick to the Strategy - Not the Stocks

If a stock no longer meets the fundamental criteria that led you to buy it, don't feel obligated to hold on to it.

You're a long-term investor if you stick to a strategy for the long haul - not because you blindly hold on to individual stocks for long periods.

Investing Principle 5: Don't Limit Yourself

Studies show that "style-box" investing can limit your gains by about 300 basis points per year.

Using "strategy-based investing" allows you to pick the best values in the market at any given time, regardless of market cap or growth-value designations.

Investing Principle 4: Diversify, but Don't Own the Market

Diversification is good - to a point. Maintain a focussed portfolio that includes enough stocks to limit stock-specific risk, but don't hold so many that you end up simply mirroring the market's returns.

In a rigid fundamental-based investing system, portfolios as small as 10 stocks can significantly beat the market over the long haul.

While you don't need to hold stocks in every sector or industry, set guidelines to make sure you maintain at least some diversification across those areas within your portfolio.

Investing Principle 3: Stay Disciplined Over the Long Haul

It is essential to stick to your strategy for the long term. Even the best strategies have down periods, and it can sometimes take over a year to reap the benefits of a good method. If you try to time your use of a strategy, you'll likely miss out on some big gains.

Expectations shape reactions: be prepared for short-term 10 to 20% downturns that are inevitable in the stock market - and the less frequent but also inevitable 35 to 50% downturns you'll occasionally experience. You can't predict when they will happen, so you just have to roll with them if you want to reap the market's long-term benefits.

Give the Internet a rest. Checking your portfolio every day, let alone every 10 minutes, can make you want to jump in and out of the market, which hurts your long-term performance.

Investing Principle 2: Stick to the Numbers

Human emotions cloud decision-making, hampering human beings' forecasting abilities.

Using proven, quantitative strategies allows you to make buy and sell decisions solely on the numbers - a stock's fundamentals - helping to remove emotion from the process.

It is best to stick firmly to strategies that are backed up by long, proven track records.

Investing Principle 1: Combining Strategies

Because of compounding, downside volatility costs you money.

If you are looking to smooth out returns, pick stocks with lower degrees of correlation (those that perform differently in the same type of market conditions).

Learn how to combine strategies to limit risk or enhance returns.

To maximise returns, give more weight to those strategies with the best historical track records.

How can investment returns be improved?

How to improve on my returns on my investing?

Always keep cash for emergency use. Also, always have cash for opportunistic investing. This is not a problem for those who have constant stream of cash incomes. For others, keeping cash:stock in the ratio of 25:75, gives a return quite close to those who are 100% invested into stocks.

Next, would be selecting the right stocks. Using my QVM method, we aim to select stocks that will give us good sustainable returns for a long time. We should aim for a return of 15% per year, if possible, and always going for high probability events that give high returns at low risks. Returns can also be sought from badly beaten down stocks (undervalued stocks) that will give great returns when they are repriced at fair values.

Maintain a concentrated portfolio. Bet big on those stocks you have conviction in. Do not over-diversify. The company specific risks are fully diversified when you have 6 stocks in your portfolio. An additional stock added to the portfolio after the sixth may lead to lower returns without the benefit of reducing further the risks. The market risks cannot be diversified, but can be partially managed through asset allocation.

It is important to manage the portfolio actively. This also incorporates asset allocation. There will be time when the market is bubbly, when one may need to pare down exposure to stocks, though, never completely. There will be times, when one's exposure to stock will be relatively high, especially at the end of a severe and prolonged bear market.

Always monitor the business of the stocks in the portfolio in your readings of the papers, business magazines, etc. Track their business performance every quarter through their regular financial releases.

Two active strategies are employed to improve on the returns of our portfolio. Firstly, the defensive strategy. This is to prevent harm to our portfolio. This occurs when the fundamentals of the business of the stock have deteriorated, sometimes suddenly, for various reasons. Another reason maybe "creative" accounting. In these situations, sell the related stocks quickly. Do not hesistate. Speed in selling is important in reducing severe damage to your portfolio, by limiting the losses.

The next is termed offensive strategy. Of 5 stocks one invest into, expect 1 to perform exceptionally well, 3 to be fairly well and 1 to do "not so well or badly". You have time to apply this strategy leisurely. There is no urgency as like the situation previously described.

Review and rebalance your portfolio at regular intervals. Perhaps, once per month or even less frequent than this. You may wish to sell or trim the stocks where the prices are too high, reducing the upside potential and increasing the downside risk. You may also wish to sell or trim those stocks where the potential for upside gain is assessed to be low. (Remember you aim for 15% return on an annual basis.) The cash derived from their disposals should be re-deployed into those stocks which have a higher potential for gain.

Sounds simple, but trust me, active investing and active management of portfolio are both challenging and take effort. However, the returns can be good for those employing a disciplined investing philosophy and strategy.

Risk comes from misjudgement of a company's prospects, not price volatility

Academics define risk as price volatility, and to counter that risk, they recommend holding a diversified portfolio.

But to value investors, like Warren Buffett, risk is the intrinsic value risk of a business, not the price behaviour of its stock. And intrinsic value risk, he says, comes from misjudgement of a company's prospects. He has extreme confidence in his ability to pick fundamentally strong companies which are trading at prices below their intrinsic value, and thus favours placing big bets on these companies.

You should have the courage and conviction to put at least 10 percent of your net worth into each investment you make, he says. "We believe that a policy of portfolio concentration may well decrease risk if it raises, as it should, both the intensity with which an investor thinks about a business and the comfort level he must feel with its economic characteristics before buying into it," he explains.

Ptui

MCA: Dr M’s remarks not helping racial unity
PETALING JAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Moha-mad’s claim that the Chinese are the masters in the country will not help foster racial harmony, said the MCA.

Thursday July 23, 2009

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/23/nation/4375350&sec=nation

iCap Portfolios of 2008 and 2009

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tC9bD59Bg2AKPA3Bgfyo8qA&output=html


There are 17 stocks in iCap Portfolio for the financial year ended 31 May 2009. This is the same number of stocks as for the previous financial year ended 31 May 2008.

iCap sold:

• AirAsia,
• Axiata and
• VADS.

2 new stocks were included in the present portfolio at the cost of $ 42.95 million, namely,

• Astro (31% gain), and,
  
• KLKepong (30.16% gain).
  

During the last financial year, iCap added more shares at the cost of $ 6.1 million, in 4 pre-existing stocks:

• Boustead (average cost of newly bought shares 3.64, giving 8.17% gain)
  
• Parkson (average cost of newly bought shares 4.84, giving 13.62% gain)
  
• PohKong (average cost of newly bought shares 0.36, giving 6.73% gain)
  
• HaiO (HaiO shares are probably from share dividends).

iCap NAV fell from $1.95 per share on 31 May 2008 to RM 1.77 per share by 31 May 2009 or a loss of 9%. The KLCI declined 18% in the same period.

How best to allocate your funds?

To a certain extent, that depends on your risk appetite, which in turn hinges on your individual circumstances.

A risk-averse investor may hold more cash, and a risk-tolerant investor vice-versa.

Allocation will also depend on market conditions.

Equity risk premium can be a good guiding principle for asset allocation decisions, i.e., when to hold cash and when to hold stocks if you are looking at just 2 asset classes.

Even if you have high tolerance for risks, it would be foolish to allocate 80% of your portfolio to equities during a stockmarket bubble.

And even, if the market was "normal" when you allocated your assets, prices will move, leaving you holding more of one asset class than you desire. In which case, you might want to rebalance your portfolio.

Stocks, bonds or cash? How much you hold of each asset class - or asset allocation - is the most important decision in an investment process. Studies have shown that about 95% of variations in returns on portfolios are explained by asset allocation decisions. Only about 5% are due to other causes, such as security selection.

Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling

When is the market over-valued?

The stock market moves in a cycle - from extreme optimism to extreme pessimism. How can you tell when stocks are under or over-valued vis-a-vis bonds or cash? Taking advantage of perceived over or under-valuation of securities in different asset classes can yield spectacular results.

Equity risk premium:

> 3.5%, market is undervalued
< 0.6%, market is overvalued.
0.6% to 3.5%, market is fairly valued.

Equity risk premium is the compensation investors require for holding stocks.

When the economic outlook is bad, or in the aftermath of a catastrophe, the equity risk premium will be high because fear grips investors and they can only be enticed to hold "risky" stocks if the promised returns are good.

Conversely, in good times everyone become over-confident of the continued good performance of stocks and will demand very little compensation to hold them.

Equity risk premium
= earnings yield (1/market PE) - the risk free rate.

Market PE ratios were obtained from Thomson Financial Datastream.
One-year deposit rates were taken as risk-free rates.

Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling

My investment horizon is 10 or 20 years

Those with investment horizons of 10 or 20 years should be ever ready to embrace out-of-favour asset classes.

Time and again, the market has handsomely rewarded those willing to bear equity risk in uncertain times. Extreme pessimism - which leads to swings from the equilibrium - compresses a proverbial spring that will eventually bounce back into equilibrium. The more share price falls, the more return it promises a prospective buyer.

Stocks - short of the company going bankrupt - will very often produce their promised returns eventually; it is the timing that will elude us. So for those with time on their side, they have nothing to lose. In short, having an explicit investment plan supports discipline and helps ensure that an investor is not swayed by panic or overconfidence.

If one is investing for financial independence 20 or 30 years down the road, opportunities that came with Sept 11's after-shocks, the Asian financial crisis, or the recent Lehman crash, are not to be missed.

Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling

Bursa Malaysia Aims for 40 Listings a Year, CEO Yusli Says

Bursa Malaysia Aims for 40 Listings a Year, CEO Yusli Says


By Chan Tien Hin

July 21 (Bloomberg) -- Bursa Malaysia Bhd., operator of the nation’s exchange, said it aims to attract as many as 40 new listings a year as the easing of investment rules in the country helps draw foreign investors.

Bursa attracted 23 listings last year and 26 in 2007, down from 40 three years ago, according to its Web site. Only one sold shares for the first time in the first half, it added.

“Over the next six months, if we get the same number as last year, that will be good,” Yusli Yusoff, Bursa’s chief executive officer, said in an interview in Kuala Lumpur. “I don’t see why we can’t continue the momentum, I’ve always said that in any year, we should be looking at 30 to 40 companies.”

Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak last month eased investment rules governing initial public offerings and takeovers, scrapping the need for overseas companies and publicly traded Malaysian businesses to set aside 30 percent of their equity to local ethnic Malay investors.

Najib, who took office in April, is overhauling the Southeast Asian nation’s financial markets to attract investors and revive an economy that’s facing its first contraction in a decade. The benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI has risen 30 percent this year, lagging behind regional markets.

The measure’s gap with Southeast Asian indexes may widen. Macquarie Group Ltd. said in a report today that investors should “take profit” in Malaysian stocks as “liquidity and earnings upgrades are showing signs of fatigue.”
‘Big Ones’

Bursa said more than 20 companies are already in the “pipeline” for initial share sales, including a handful of businesses from China, with more expected following the easing of investment rules.

“We expect companies who previously may not have wanted to come to the market because of this condition to now come forward,” Yusli said today. “I want some big ones this year.”

The bourse said discussions with Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges to develop an electronic trading link connecting five markets in the next two to three years are at a “fairly advanced stage.”

Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges signed a preliminary agreement on Feb. 23 to develop a trading link to boost competitiveness and lure more overseas funds into the region.

To contact the reporter on this story: Chan Tien Hin in Kuala Lumpur at thchan@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: July 20, 2009 23:12 EDT

Warren Buffett's Priceless Investment Advice

Warren Buffett's Priceless Investment Advice
By John Reeves
July 19, 2009


"It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."

If you can grasp this simple advice from Warren Buffett, you should do well as an investor. Sure, there are other investment strategies out there, but Buffett's approach is both easy to follow and demonstrably successful over more than 50 years. Why try anything else?

Two words for the efficient market hypothesis: Warren Buffett

An interesting academic study (PDF file) illustrates Buffett's amazing investment genius. From 1980 to 2003, the stock portfolio of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) beat the S&P 500 index in 20 out of 24 years. During that same period, Berkshire's average annual return from its stock portfolio outperformed the index by 12 percentage points. The efficient market theory predicts that this is impossible, but the theory is clearly wrong in this case.

Buffett has delivered these outstanding returns by buying undervalued shares in great companies such as Gillette, now owned by Procter & Gamble. Over the years, Berkshire has owned household names such as UPS (NYSE: UPS), Iron Mountain (NYSE: IRM), and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT).

Although not every pick worked out, for the most part Buffett and Berkshire have made a mint. Indeed, Buffett's investment in Gillette increased threefold during the 1990s. Who'd have guessed you could get such stratospheric returns from razors?

The devil is in the details
So buying great companies at reasonable prices can deliver solid returns for long-term investors. The challenge, of course, is identifying great companies and determining what constitutes a reasonable price.

Buffett recommends that investors look for companies that deliver outstanding returns on capital and produce substantial cash profits. He also suggests that you look for companies with a huge economic moat to protect them from competitors. You can identify companies with moats by looking for strong brands that stand alongside consistent or improving profit margins and returns on capital.

How do you determine the right buy price for shares in such companies? Buffett advises that you wait patiently for opportunities to purchase stocks at a significant discount to their intrinsic values -- as calculated by taking the present value of all future cash flows. Ultimately, he believes that "value will in time always be reflected in market price." When the market finally recognizes the true worth of your undervalued shares, you begin to earn solid returns.

Do-it-yourself outperformance
Before they can capture Buffett-like returns, beginning investors will need to develop their skills in identifying profitable companies and determining intrinsic values. In the meantime, consider looking for stock ideas among Berkshire's own holdings.

In the Form 13-F that Berkshire filed recently, we learned that Buffett has boosted his stake in financials, adding to existing positions Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and U.S. Bank (NYSE: USB).

It's pretty clear that Buffett thinks these conservatively run banks represent compelling investment opportunities at the moment. In fact, Buffett claimed in May that if he had to put all of his net worth into a single stock, it would be Wells Fargo.

Despite Buffett's confidence, it's clear that many individual investors are still afraid of financial stocks. If you fall into that camp, another place to find great value-stock ideas is Motley Fool Inside Value. Philip Durell, the advisor for the service, follows an investment strategy very similar to Buffett's.

He looks for undervalued companies that also have strong financials and competitive positions. This approach has allowed Philip to outperform the market since Inside Value's inception in 2004. To see his most recent stock picks, as well as the entire archive of past selections, sign up for a free 30-day trial today.

If investing in wonderful companies at fair prices is good enough for Warren Buffett -- arguably the finest investor on the planet -- it should be good enough for the rest of us.

Already subscribe to Inside Value? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was originally published on April 7, 2007. It has been updated.

John Reeves can't remember the last time he used a razor made by someone other than Gillette, and he wishes he'd owned shares in that company before P&G acquired it. John does not own shares of any companies mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Procter & Gamble. Berkshire and Wal-Mart are Inside Value recommendations. Berkshire is also a Stock Advisor selection. UPS and P&G are Income Investor picks. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Marc Faber: The next bubble being inflated right now

Faber: Next Stimulus Will Be Worse

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:46 PM

By: Julie Crawshaw Article Font Size

Some economists think that another bubble is what’s needed to get the economy moving again.

Gloom, Boom and Doom publisher Marc Faber said this is ridiculous, and that the Federal Reserve — which he holds responsible for creating the housing bubble — wants to do it all over again.

The central bank should not encourage excessive credit growth, Faber tells Moneynews.com's Dan Mangru in an exclusive interview.

Between 2000 and 2007 the total U.S. credit market debt increased at five times the rate of nominal gross domestic product.

Unfortunately, Faber said, the next bubble is already here. This time it’s government spending and fiscal deficits that Faber thinks will double the government’s debt during the next six years or less.

“The U.S. government is largely deranged,” he said. “The private sector is the dynamic one, and that’s why I object tremendously against building up fiscal deficits because (they) shift economic activity into unproductive government instead of leaving it in the private sector.”

Another stimulus package would only make matters worse.

“In the Depression, they had one stimulus after another and it didn’t help,” Faber said. “What helped was World War II.”

The problem with bubbles, Faber said, is that they only temporarily stimulate the economy.

“The whole economic expansion driven by a bubble in America has been a total disaster and has shifted wealth from the ordinary people who work … to the Wall Street elite,” he said.

Nor does the government score any higher when it comes to managing inflation, which Faber thinks will reach Zimbabwe-like levels in the U.S. courtesy of the Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates too low.

“The Fed, in my opinion, has zilch idea about monetary policy,” Faber said.

“What they focus upon is basically core inflation, which does not include energy and food prices and the way the Fed measures inflation is highly questionable in the first place because when you measure inflation it’s a basket of goods and services.”

When the economy recovers, interest rates should go up because of inflationary pressures, something Faber expects the Fed won’t let happen because it could cause interest payments on the government’s debt to double. Those payments today are slightly below $500 billion annually.

If the global economy collapses in a deflationary spiral, those government deficits actually expand, leading to more central bank-driven monetization, Faber said. And keeping interest rates artificially low will lead to more and more inflation.

Add to all of this the expectation that health care costs will soar and jobless rates will probably continue to be high, and the economic picture becomes even gloomier.

“I think we’ve just gone … to the beginning of the realization that the economy may be bottoming out but not much recovery is forthcoming,” Faber said.

© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/2349/Economy/eml

http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/federal_reserve/2009/07/15/235992.html

The biggest assumption and risk for investors: Earning Forecast

The biggest assumption in any valuation model is the earning forecast.

We have assumed that the earning forecasts by various analysts are good and accurate. This is the biggest risk investors have to face.

In general, investors can use consensus earning forecasts for computing the valuation, however, through experience, investors can identify good analysts from not so good ones, and hence, can be selective in using the earning forecast data.

Bear in mind that a way-off-earning forecast (especially over-bullish) could have disastrous effects on the stock price once the actual result is announced.

A good practice is to compare the forecast EPS growth rate with the averge EPS growth rate in the past three years and see whether the forecast EPS growth rate is in line with the historical numbers.

In short, what investors are looking for is an accurate EPS growth forecast.

Analysts' earnings forecasts

Investors should be aware that in an up cycle, analysts would do two things:

1. to upgrade the earning forecast almost on a regular basis, and,
2. to accord the stock on a higher valuation (i.e. stock is now valued at a higher PE ratio).

This, we call, earning expansion and PE ratio expansion.

Normally, the analysts would do this a couple of times during a complete up cycle.

In a down cycle, the reverse happens. That is, earning and PE ratio (valuation) contract.

For those who have been investing over the last 4 years, they would have observed these in the analysts reports during the bull and the bear phases of the market.

What lessons should we learn from this?

We should not be sucked into this as we know that a very high EPS forecast is not sustainable (as compared to its historical records), and hence disappointment or downgrade would ahve to occur and we need to get out of this before it happens.

Thus, it is very important to know the big picture to gain an inkling of which stage of the economic cycle we are in now and how it is going to move looking forward.

Hence, when we look at EPS growth, we should ask ourselves whether it is sustainable in the next few years.

PE ratio, PEG and EPS Growth rates

A high PE ratio by itself means that either

• the valuation is very expensive (where the stock price is high as compared to its EPS) or
• it has such great potential for growth that investors are willing to accord it with a high PE ratio.

In general, the lower the PE ratio, the better it is.

For high growth stocks, we also look at the PEG ratio (PE ratio/ EPS Growth rate). For high growth stocks, their PE ratio if viewed on absolute basis is usually very high. How do we then decide if it is still "cheap" enough for us to hold or even buy? We use the PEG ratio to see whether its growth is at a faster rate as compared to its appreciation in value (i.e. high PE ratio). If PEG is low despite a high PE ratio, this would indicate the growth in earning (higher EPS growth) is much faster than the increase in its valuation (higher PER), and hence could justify our holding or even buying the stock.

Public Bank records RM1.54b pre-tax profit in H1

Monday July 20 2009.

KUALA LUMPUR, July 20 — Public Bank Bhd posted a pre-tax profit of RM1.564 billion in the first half of the year year ended June 30, 2009 compared with RM1.76 billion in the same period last year.

Revenue declined to RM4.78 billion from RM5.15 billion previously.

In a statement today, the bank said net interest and financing income grew by nine per cent to RM180 million, driven by its expanding loan and deposits businesses and sustained strong assets.

It said total assets crossed the RM200 billion mark for the first time, standing at RM204.0 billion as at end-June 2009.

Total loans and advances grew by RM8.7 billion, or 7.2 per cent, in the first six months of 2009, to RM129.4 billion, significantly above the banking industry’s 1.2 per cent for the first five months of 2009, it said.

Public Bank said core customer deposits grew by 11.5 per cent in the first six months of 2009 to RM125.3 billion compared with the industry’s 2.9 per cent during the first five months of 2009.

As at the end-May 2009, Public Bank’s domestic market share of total loans and core customer deposits rose to 15.5 per cent and 15.2 per cent respectively compared with 14.8 per cent and 14.7 per cent respectively as at Dec 31, 2008, it said.

It said the group's net non-performing loan ratio was below one per cent as at end-June 2009, significantly lower than the industry’s 2.2 per cent in May 2009.

The group’s loan loss coverage of 173 per cent was about twice the banking industry’s ratio of 87 per cent, and continued to be the highest and most prudent in the Malaysian banking industry, it said.

On outlook, it said, despite the slowing economy, the banking industry in Malaysia remained resilient, supported by its strong capitalisation, stable asset quality and improved risk management practices.

Hence, it said, the group would continue to pursue its strategy of strong organic business growth, as well as maintain a high quality loan portfolio and improved productivity.

"Barring unforeseen circumstances, the group is expected to continue to record satisfactory performance for the rest of 2009," it said. — Bernama

Wake up Malaysians. “What has this country come to?”

What has this country come to?

There had been so many unexplained and unresolved incidences. Altantunya, Kugan, and now Teoh. There are also many issues, like Lingam tapes, alleged corruptions in high places, abuses of public offices and others.

When some lawyers mentioned in 1998 that if such an "event" can happen to Anwar, then the deputy PM, it may happen to anyone. They were not mincing their words.

Politics in this country is very partisan. Even the recent tragedy of Teoh, which should have provoked a bipartisan response, was debated by some "significant" politicians in a partisan manner. Surprisingly, too many remain silent on this important issue. This is truly saddening.

Where is the sense of right and wrong in these politicians and certain national papers.

Wake up Malaysians.

Market risk or systemic risk

This risk cannot be eliminated by diversifying one's portfolio.

Definitions of Market risk on the Web:

Market risk is the risk that the value of an investment will decrease due to moves in market factors. The four standard market risk factors are: * Equity risk, the risk that stock prices will change. * Interest rate risk, the risk that interest rates will change. ...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_risk

The possibility that the value of an investment will fall because of a general decline in the financial markets.www.waddell.com/jsp/index.jsp

The chance that a security's value will decline. With fixed income securities, market risk is closely tied to interest rate risk--as interest rates rise, prices decline and vice versa.www.netxclientdemo.com/invest_glosry_MMa.htm

Exposure to changes in market prices.www.info-forex.com/glossary.htm

Also called systematic risk. The portion of a security’s risk common to all securities in the same asset class, and that cannot be eliminated through diversification.www.manealfinancial.com/Glossary-MtoZ.htm

One of six risks defined by the Federal Reserve. The risk of an increase or decrease in the market value/price of a financial instrument. Market values for debt instruments are affected by actual and anticipated changes in prevailing interest rates. ...www.americanbanker.com/glossary.html

Exposure to a change in the value of some market variable, such as interest rates or foreign exchange rates, equity, or commodity prices.www.fhlb.com/Glossary.html

Market risk refers to the risk of financial loss as a result of adverse market movements. NZDMO specifically measures market risk with regard to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.www.oag.govt.nz/2007/nzdmo/glossary.htm

The value of a security may decline due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor ...www.dreyfus.com/content/dr/control

Uncertainty in the value of real estate due to market, economic, political or other conditions.www.new-york-new-york-real-estate.com/m2.html

The risk of loss resulting from changes in the prices of financial instruments in the markets in which Chase participates, such as changes in the value of foreign exchange or fixed-income securities.https://www.chase.com/inside/financial/annual/glossary.html

Risk that cannot be diversified away. Related: systematic riskbiz.yahoo.com/glossary/bfglosm.html

Risk relating to the market in general and cannot be diversified away by hedging or holding a variety of securities.charmforex.com/index.php

Risk of loss due to unfavourable price changes on the financial markets.www.ingwholesalebanking.com/smartsite.shtml

risk that comes from customers not wanting to buy a product, the market being smaller than originally estimated, or a competitor launching a competing product. http://www.google.com/url?&q=http://www.epilepsy.com/innovation/entrepreneurs/glossary&ei=FexiSvKmMZWBkQWf1antDw&sa=X&oi=define&ct=&cd=1&usg=AFQjCNFChX-S8PEUc0fWkKKMwHxGc_shwA

Has the share price discounted all the negatives?

In a downturn, or a crash, the price of a stock may go down by a large amount. After the price has stabilised, the question to ask oneself, would be: "Has this share price discounted all the negatives?" Re-value this stock again using its latest fundamentals. It may be a rewarding exercise.

Wake up Malaysians. “What has this country come to?”

The MACC is a highly efficient body. However, it has not been unnoticed that this body moves very fast in certain cases, and suffers severe malaise in others. A very sad situation reflecting the political culture in this country. Wake up Malaysians.

Covered Warrants

Covered Warrants on the London Stock Exchange

In October 2002, the LSE launched a market in covered warrants. Its first year was a resounding success, with 823 new issues and trading volume of GBP97 million.

A covered warrant is essentially an option. Unlike the traditional "corporate" warrant, which is issued by the underlying company, a financial institution issues the covered warrant.

Goldman, Sachs, and JP Morgan, are notable players in this market.

Covered warrants are sometimes referred to as securitised derivatives.

Whereas the typical corporate warrants gives the holder the right to buy shares directly from the company (like a call option), the covered warrant comes in may forms:

• some (put warrants) carry the right to sell rather than to buy,
• some are based on foreign exchange or commodities rather than on stock, and,
• some have complicated exercise terms.

http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/market_information/market_statistics/equities/downloads/call_warrants.pdf

Characteristics of warrants

A warrant is a non-dividend paying security giving its owner the right to buy a certain number of shares at a set price directly from the issuing company. These usually have an initial life of between 3 and 5 years.

Characteristics

Warrants are often issued in conjuction with a new debt issue.

Including a warrant with the bond enables the issuing firm to float the bond issue at a lower interest rate than would otherwise be required. This may be the primary motivation for their issuance.

Warrants can be detachable and nondetachable, although the former are more important for our purposes. Detachable warrants may be sold separately from their accompanying debt issue. A nondetachable warrant cannot be sold separately.

Warrants pay no dividends, and they carry no voting rights. Their principal investment attraction is the leverage they provide; the warrant price is less than that of the corresponding common stock, and consequently warrant investments magnify the effect of stock price movements.

Warrants can have unusual exercise terms and conditions. The Standard & Poor's Stock Guide listing for many warrants indicates "terms and trading basis should be checked in detail." The majority of US warrants are from small, relatively risky firms. Newly issued warrants usually originate in conjunction with an initial public offering.

Some warrants are called "B" warrants. These come about from the exercise of an "A" warrant that allows its owner to trade the warrant for shares of stock and a "B" warrant with a higher exercise price than the "A" warrant.

Looking at warrant population by stock price range, the majority are from a firm whose stock price is low. While there may be no inherent reason why a low-priced stock should be risky, it is an empirical observation that a low stock price is frequently associated with higher relative risk.


A warrant is much like a long-term call option issued by the underlying company. The warrant holder has the right but not the obligations, to buy shares at a set price during the life of the warant. Warrants provide leverage in the same fashion as an option.

Warrants and leverage

Speculators buy warrants because of the leverage they provide.

Example:

CBrand
Number of warrants to buy 1 share: 1
Exercise price: $19.23
Expiration: 3-10-09
Warrant price: $10.00
Stock price: $27.46

Suppose someone believes that CBrand is an attractive investment and wants to put about $5000 into the company. The speculator could buy either:

$5000/$10 per warrant = 500 warrants

or

$5000/$27.46 per share = 182 shares

Suppose at the end of the warrant's life in 2009, CBrand stock sells for $40.00.

With an exercise price of $19.23, the warrants would be worth $40.00 - $19.23 = $20.77.

The holding of 500 warrants would be worth $10,385.
The 182 shares of stock would be worth $7,280.

The respective holding period returns are as follows:

Warrants: ($10,385 - $5,000)/$5,000 = 107.7%
Stock: ($7,280 - $5,000) / $5,000 = 45.6%

CBrand pays a dividend, so the value of the dividend should be included in the stock holding period calculation in order for the comparison to be fair. Shareholders are entitled to declared dividends; warrant holders are not.

Extending the life of out-of-the-money warrant

Companies sometimes extend the life of an out-of-the-money (stock price is less than exercise price) warrant as it nears expiration. The exercise of warrants is a relatively inexpensive source of new capital for the firm. Management may not want to let the opportunity pass.

Extending the life of a warrant will immediately add value to it. A nearly worthless expiring warrant is likely to jump several dollars in value if the firm extends its life a few years.

The actual price change would depend on:

• the stock/exercise price relationship,
• the added term of the warrant, and
• the anticipated volatility of the stock over the extension period.

Pricing of Warrants (illustrations)

Illustrations

AR warrant.

Exercise price $7.32
Current stock price $11.95
This warrant is in-the-money.
It must sell for at least its intrinsic value of $11.95-$7.32 = $4.63, which it does.
Market price of warrant $5.00, represents a $0.37 premium over the warrant's intrinsic value.


GC warrant

4 warrants to buy 1 share at $6.60
Current stock price $19.72
What is the minimum value for which this warrant should sell?

Current stock price > exercise price by $19.72-$6.60 - $13.12.
This amount would be the intrinsic value of the warrant if each warrant permitted the purchase of one share.

Because 4 warrants are required, the intrinsic value declines proportionately: $13.12/4 = $3.28.

This amount is the minimum value at which the warrant should sell.

http://www.klse.com.my/website/bm/market_information/market_statistics/equities/downloads/warrants_info.pdf

Pricing of Warrants

The most important factor influencing the market price of a warrant is the relationship between the price of the underlying common stock and the price at which the investor may buy shares - the exercise price.

The warrant is in-the-money: stock price > exercise price
The warrant is out-of-the money: stock price < exercise price.

When the warrant is in-the-money, it has intrinsic value.

Minimum, maximum and actual market values of a warrant.

If it takes one warrant to buy one shae of stock, then the effective exercise price is the same as the stated exercise price.

If however, a single warrant with an exercise price of $10 allows you to buy 2 shares of a stock, the effective exercise price is $5.

Effective exercise price = Exercise price/conversion ratio

As Standard & Poor's warns, "trading terms and basis should be checked in detail." An investor should always check the effective exercise price, which is the stated exercise price divided by the conversion ratio. It is the amount of money needed to buy one share of the stock.

Assuming a conversion ratio of 1:1, it would not make sense for the warrant to ever sell for more than the value of the underlying asset. The theoretical maximum price of a warrant is therefore equal to the stock price. (For instance, if one share of the stock sells for $25, no rational person would be willing to pay more than $25 for the right to buy a share, even if the warrant exercise price were zero.)

The theoretical minimum value is the warrant's intrinsic value. This is the greater of zero and the amount by which the stock price exceeds the exercise price. (Given a stock price of $25 and an exercise price of $20, this warrant should always sell for at least $5. If not, arbitrage would be present.)

Actual warrant prices fall between the two extremes. The gap between the market price of the warrant and its minimum value is largest when the stock price equals the exercise price. As the stock price rises or falls from this point, the gap narrows.

The Problem with Big Losses

Risky situation must involve a chance of loss.

Suppose the possible returns on an investment fall into a normal distribution curve. This distribution shows this investment has an expected return of 9.5%. Standard statistical thinking tells use if we invest in this stocka nd hold it, some years we will have high rturns and some years low returns, but that, on average, the return will be 9.5%. This assumption is true, but it is also a potentially misleading result.

To see why, suppose an investor buys this stock and holds it 10 years. In each of 9 of those years, the stock advances 20%; in the other year it falls 90%. The 10-year arithmetic average return is 9%, slightly below the return predicted by the distribution. A $1,000 invesment, howver, would be worth only $1,000(1.20)^9*(0.10) = $516, less than the starting value! The compound annual rate of return is a negative 6.40%.

The lesson is that a large one period loss can overwhelm a series of gains. If an initial investment falls by 50%, for instance, it must gain 100% to return to its original value. Big losses complicate actual returns, and investors learn to avoid situations where they may lurk.

Understanding Warrant

For example:

WARRANTS xx07/xx16
- new ordinary share at an exercise price of RM0.40 per ordinary share.
- The exercise period is 9 years from the date of issuance which will expire on xx, May xx16.

-----
Illustration:-

Today's Share Price: 14.40
Warrant's Price: 10.80
Exercise Price: 5.30
Quantity: 60,000,000 free detachable warrants


In-the-money:

Market price of mother share > exercise price

Intrinsic value of warrant
= Market share price - Exercise price of warrant
= 14.40 - 5.30 = 9.10.

Therefore, you can exercise your right to buy the mother share at the exercise (lower) price to sell at the market (higher) price.

Premium:

Premium paid for the warrant
= Warrant market price - Intrinsic value of warrant
= 10.80 - 9.10
= 1.70

The premium paid is 1.70 (1.70/9.10 = 18.7%) over the warrant's intrinsic value.

Premiums (over the warrant's intrinsic value) are commonly used as a quick measure of the warrant's expensiveness. Because warrants are issued at a premium, investors must consider if it can appreciate to a level that allows recovery of the paid premium within the warrant's lifespan.

While warrants can offer a smart addition to a portfolio, keep in mind the following - your view of the underlying share is important; understand the unique nature of warrants and stay attentive to small movements in the market.


Cash extraction:

Assuming mother share increased to $2.00 and warrants also increased, to $1.58.

One can sell the mother share and invest some of these money into its warrants. Effectively, you would have decreased your invested capital (extracted cash of 0.42 per share) while maintaining exposure to further upside.

Including Warrant in your Portfolio

A warrant is a specialized investment tool with its own language; call warrants, in-the-money warrants (a warrant with an exercise price which is below the market price of its underlying security), gearing and premiums are among the terms used. It's important to understand the main aspects of this vehicle before including it in your portfolio.

A warrant is a derivative, meaning it 'derives' its value from its underlying share. This is why the performance of a warrant will always depend on the performance of its underlying share.

A small movement in the price of the mother share can result in a surge or fall in the value of your warrant. Thus, expect this to happen and choose strategies that leverage and profit from this behavior.

Unlike a share, warrants carry an expiry date. The warrant tends to lose its value when it's close to expiring. Once it expires, it has no value and you lose the capital invested to buy the warrant. Buying and holding, as you would a share, is why 90% of warrant traders lose their capital.

If the underlying share price is above the warrant strike price (the predetermined price that the warrant holder is entitled to purchase or sell in the case of put warrant the underlying security), your call warrant is said to be in-the-money and you can exercise your right to buy the mother share at the strike (lower) price to sell at the market (higher) price.

There are costs involved when buying warrants - transaction costs and the time lag before you receive the underlying share after exercising the warrant. There're also occasions when a warrant trades at a discount. This incurs when the strike price and the cost to obtain the warrant are less than the price of the underlying share. Even tough this may look like an opportunity to make arbitrage profit, however, the risk of the underlying share price falling during the period between receiving the shares from exercising the warrant and their sale.

The whole process can take up to a month, during which the mother share can move in any direction. Warrants can also trade at a discount if the underlying share has just enjoyed spectacular run in price. Investors should avoid buying these discount warrants if they feel the high price of the mother share is unsustainable.

Warrants are the domain of short run traders. Some analysts recommend a particular trading strategy known as cash extraction. This strategy can be executed if you're holding a particular share that has appreciated in value. By selling the share and investing some of the proceeds into its warrants, you decrease your invested capital while maintaining exposure to further upside.

Many investors also trade in warrants because they sell at a fraction of the price of the underlying share and their leverage effect (a characteristic of warrants that enables the holder to enjoy larger percentage returns than the underlying security, at a lower price) allows the investors making bigger percentage gains when compared with conventional share investments.

For instance, share ABC may gain 30cent to close at $1.80, representing an increase of 20%, but a similar gain of 30cent for warrant ABC (from 50cent) to 80cent is an equivalent gain of 60%.

When the price paid for the warrant as well as its strike price is higher than the price of the underlying share, the warrant is trading at a premium. Meaning, the warrant's premium can crudely measure how much more expensive it is to acquire a share via a warrant compared with buying the share directly. Premiums are commonly used as a quick measure of the warrant's expensiveness. Because warrants are issued at a premium, investors must consider if it can appreciate to a level that allows recovery of the paid premium within the warrant's lifespan.

Another important factor to consider when selecting a warrant is volatility. A high volatility warrant, even though more expensive, can very well generate more money than a low volatility warrant. High volatility means that the underlying share is more likely making big swings.

While warrants can offer a smart addition to a portfolio, keep in mind the following - your view of the underlying share is important; understand the unique nature of warrants and stay attentive to small movements in the market.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Investing:-Warrant&id=291064

KLSE Market PE is 19.70

09.07.09
PE Ratio
19.70

Div Yield
3.47

Price/Bk Value
1.90

KLSE CI
1065.68


02.07.09
PE Ratio
17.63

Div Yield
3.54

Price/Bk Value
1.61

KLSE CI
1078.71


03.07.08
PE Ratio
10.24

Div Yield
3.74

Price/Bk Value
1.82

KLSE CI
1153.70


http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=tfdJmkOsX8p5jmD7g1FgrIw


Even in this bullish environment, one can still look for bargains. Time for another rebalancing of my portfolio.

Market PE

The largest companies on Bursa Malaysia ranked by market capitalization.

Market Capitalization 580,236.6

Net Profit 41,161.1

Market PE 14.1

http://www.horizon.my/investor/list.php


1 SIME 6,009.5 7.350 44,169.8 34,044.7 3,512.1
2 MAYBANK 7,077.7 5.900 41,758.4 16,153.9 2,928.2
3 PBBANK 3,531.9 9.950 35,142.4 10,500.3 2,622.7
4 COMMERZ 3,578.1 9.700 34,707.6 - 1,952.0
5 TENAGA 4,334.6 7.900 34,243.3 25,750.6 2,594.0
6 MISC 3,719.8 8.550 31,804.3 12,957.4 2,430.3
7 IOICORP 6,150.6 4.660 28,661.8 14,665.4 2,231.6
8 AXIATA 8,445.1 2.700 22,801.8 11,347.7 498.0
9 GENTING 3,703.8 5.650 20,926.5 9,082.5 569.3
10 PETGAS 1,978.7 9.800 19,391.3 3,125.7 1,092.9
11 DIGI 777.5 22.000 17,105.0 4,814.5 1,140.7
12 PLUS 5,000.0 3.180 15,900.0 2,968.0 1,079.3
13 PPB 1,185.5 12.000 14,226.0 3,462.0 1,286.5
14 BAT 285.5 44.750 12,776.1 4,135.2 811.7
15 KLK 1,067.5 11.900 12,703.3 7,855.4 1,040.7
16 YTLPOWR 5,464.2 2.170 11,857.3 4,242.5 1,038.8
17 YTL 1,658.8 6.850 11,362.8 6,549.9 769.8
18 TM 3,577.4 2.950 10,553.3 8,674.9 791.9
19 AMMB 2,723.0 3.680 10,020.6 5,860.7 860.8
20 RHBCAP 2,153.5 4.420 9,518.5 - 1,048.7
21 HLBANK 1,580.1 5.850 9,243.6 - 741.8
22 PETDAG 993.5 8.300 8,246.1 22,301.6 661.7
23 NESTLE 234.5 32.000 7,504.0 3,877.1 340.9
24 MMCCORP 3,045.0 2.300 7,003.5 8,545.0 527.3
25 ASTRO 1,934.0 3.480 6,730.3 2,601.7 -6.2
26 UMW 1,080.7 6.050 6,538.2 12,769.6 565.8
27 TANJONG 403.3 14.400 5,807.5 3,693.9 463.8
28 GAMUDA 2,003.2 2.870 5,749.2 2,403.7 325.1
29 BJTOTO 1,351.0 4.240 5,728.2 3,277.8 348.7
30 HLFG 1,052.8 4.960 5,221.9 - 528.7
31 PARKSON 1,036.4 4.940 5,119.8 2,354.0 448.0
32 LMCEMNT 849.7 6.000 5,098.2 2,530.8 367.7
33 IJM 859.4 5.800 4,984.5 4,637.2 -420.5
34 MAS 1,671.0 2.970 4,962.9 15,035.3 244.3
35 BJLAND 1,144.9 3.800 4,350.6 1,516.1 1,110.8
36 SPSETIA 1,008.9 3.900 3,934.7 1,328.3 213.5
37 AIRPORT 1,100.0 3.520 3,872.0 1,384.7 288.9
38 BURSA 523.7 7.250 3,796.8 290.3 104.4
39 BKAWAN 436.0 8.600 3,749.6 284.1 505.5
40 AFG 1,548.1 2.270 3,514.2 - 380.0
41 F&N 356.5 9.100 3,244.2 2,865.1 152.9
42 EONCAP 693.2 4.600 3,188.7 - 133.8
43 SHELL 300.0 10.400 3,120.0 13,086.1 -330.0
44 MAYBULK 1,000.0 3.080 3,080.0 721.2 460.9
45 KLCCP 934.1 3.220 3,007.8 843.0 441.6
46 SARAWAK 1,519.0 1.930 2,931.7 1,339.3 275.6
47 AIRASIA 2,372.4 1.200 2,846.9 1,603.3 498.0
48 BJCORP 3,047.4 0.910 2,773.1 3,465.8 616.5
49 BSTEAD 651.0 4.060 2,643.1 7,029.8 578.8
50 AFFIN 1,494.4 1.750 2,615.2 2,115.4 292.8

Beautiful Nestle (M) 19 year chart

Chart 1: Nestle M's daily chart for the past 19 years (Source: Tradesignum)

http://nexttrade.blogspot.com/2009/07/nestle-m-time-to-take-profit.html