Wednesday 1 October 2014

Hartalega

We are expecting the Group to maintain its net profit margin at around 20% despite bracing for headwinds of lower average selling prices (ASP) of gloves.


Earnings outlook/Revision

We lowered our earnings forecast for FY15F by 7% to factor in the lower average selling prices (ASP) of gloves as we expect that the increased competition in the nitrile gloves industry would keep selling prices subdued.

Double-digit earnings growth in FY16F. Earnings forecast for FY16F was nudged marginally higher by 1.5% as we update the installed production capacity figures for FY16. We are expecting FY16F earnings to grow by double-digit on the back of significant earnings contribution from NGC.


Valuation & Recommendation 

Maintain HOLD with a slightly higher target price of  RM7.00 (previous target price: RM6.98), following our upward revision of earnings for FY16F. We derive our target price by pegging FY16 EPS at PER of 16 times.

While we remain convinced on its growth prospect that underpinned by its expansion ahead, we still wary over the stiff competition in the nitrile gloves industry. Yet, we reckon that the high operational efficiency of the Group would aid to mitigate the adverse effect of lower ASP of gloves. Overall, we maintain our neutral view on the company.


JFApex Securities 30.9.2014



Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History
No.
Financial   Revenue   Profit Before   Net Profit   EPS Div NTA
Quarter   (RM,000)   Tax (RM,000)   (RM,000)   (Cent) (Cent) (RM) Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History,Malaysia Stock - KLSE Quarter Report History
PBTM
1 30/06/2014   279,198   75,651   57,087   7.55 4 1.34 27.1%
4 31/03/2014   280,373   70,272   49,157   6.63 3.5 1.27 25.1%
3 31/12/2013   267,820   74,673   57,876   7.81 3.5 1.23 27.9%
2 30/09/2013   280,953   82,300   63,273   8.55 3.5 1.18 29.3%
1 30/06/2013   278,014   81,917   62,912   8.56 4 1.1 29.5%
4 31/03/2013   269,772   81,318   62,293   8.52 3.5 1.05 30.1%
3 31/12/2012   259,565   78,368   60,529   8.28 3.5 0.99 30.2%
2 30/09/2012   255,019   76,282   58,597   8.01 3.5 0.94 29.9%
1 30/06/2012   247,678   69,914   53,358   7.3 0 0.9 28.2%
4 31/03/2012   240,217   64,460   50,012   13.73 6 1.7 26.8%
3 31/12/2011   241,951   63,902   50,703   13.93 6 1.61 26.4%
2 30/09/2011   229,542   59,551   46,127   12.68 6 1.53 25.9%

Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager Explains To MBA Students How He Makes A Ridiculous Amount Of Money


 FINANCE  


Paulson, who shot to fame after making billions betting against subprime during the housing crisis, was part of a panel at NYU Stern called the “Future of Finance” with Citigroup CEO Michael Corbat and Warburg Pincus Joe Landry. The Wall Street Journal’s Francesco Guerrera was the moderator. 
Earlier on in the panel, Paulson discussed how the hedge fund industry has changed since he launched Paulson & Co., which now manages over $20 billion of assets.
It’s a big number even by today’s hedge fund size standards. Compared to  decades ago, however, it’s absolutely massive.
Paulson pointed out that in the early 90s, a large fund would have about $100 to $200 million. These days, the largest funds have billions in assets.
The larger AUM also contributes to a manager’s yearly take-home pay.  
When Paulson discussed the massive paychecks some of the top fund managers take home you could see folks in the audience grin.
Fund managers are paid through a compensation structure commonly known as the “2 and 20,” which stands for a 2 percent management fee and a 20 percent performance fee charge. More specifically, “2 and 20″ means a hedge fund manager would charge investors 2 percent of total assets under management and 20 percent of any profits.
“So hedge funds have grown, the fee structure has stayed the same. The capital of the partners has become a more and more significant part of the earnings of the hedge fund managers. The total compensation to hedge fund managers has really grown enormously.” 
Paulson pointed out that Institutional Investor’s Alpha magazine has a list featuring the estimates of the top 25 highest earning managers. He said that he lowest paid, No. 25, took home about $300 million and the top five averaged excess of $2 billion. 
“After this little ah quick John Paulson math, I am tempted to send my résumé,” panel moderator Guerrera joked.
Also, Paulson ranked No. 3 for the “rich list.” His take home pay in 2013 was $2.3 billion. He was just behind Steven Cohen and David Tepper. 

http://www.businessinsider.my/john-paulson-compensation-2014-9/#.VCuEKGeSySo

Tuesday 30 September 2014

Warren Buffett losing US$700 million in Tesco & iCapital International Value Fund

This fund started investing in July 2009. Its performance in AUD since then is shown below together with the benchmarks MSCI ACWI index and ASX200.
Table: 1 Jul 2009 to 31 Aug 2014
Total Return% Change
Currency01-Jul-200931-Aug-2014
ICIVFA$1.00001.463946.39
MSCI ACWIA$1204.2423461.398250.71
ASX200A$306.15375625.900045.22



Commentary


Mindful of the rich valuation many markets are trading at, Capital Dynamics (Australia) Ltd continues to maintain the high cash level of your fund. Is this right?

Patience is more than inactivity; it is working diligently without being anxious. Although constantly on the lookout for new opportunities, Capital Dynamics (Australia) Ltd needs to have the patience to wait for the right investment to fall into the right price range.

Unfortunately, many amateur and professional investors succumb to all sorts of pressure to avoid subpar quarterly performance or personal pressures to avoid the feeling of being left out as the market surges. They make the classic mistake of seeing investment opportunities because they want it to be there, not because they’re actually there.

An investor who has fallen into this trap, in other words, will start to gradually twist the facts, skew his own perception of the situation, and even erode his own standards for investment, just to make that investment opportunity available.

In this day and age, patience is in short supply now, which is precisely why it is a valuable core strategy. As we wait, it is interesting to note that the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, is getting hit in the Tesco debacle, having lost over US$700 million on his US1.7 billion investment, which was made in 2007. 

What is not known to many, however, is the fact that Capital Dynamics (Australia) Ltd sold all of your fund’s holdings in Tesco Plc way back in 2011. Less than a year later, Tesco dumbfounded investors by issuing a profit warning for the first time in 20 years, and reported a decline in annual profit last year. While not a massive $320 billion global conglomerate and lacking the resources and manpower Buffett has, Capital Dynamics (Australia) Ltd, a relatively small investment firm, is proudly rooted in Asia but with a global perspective and capabilities.


The NAV and distribution history of i Capital International Value Fund can be viewed at www.capitaldynamics.com.au or www.funds.icapital.biz.


Those who invested in this fund would have received this report.

Sunday 28 September 2014

A Very Simple and Effective Approach to Investing.

From Detergent To Driverless Cars: Stock Picking Lessons From 60 Years On (And Off) The Street

Investors, entrepreneurs and financial journalists alike are obsessed with what the rise of the Millennial generation will mean for the future of money. Yet, a conversation with an industry veteran served as a reminder that looking back can be just as important as looking forward — even in stock picking.

Gail Winslow has worked in the wealth management industry for 59 and 1/2 years — “to be exact.” She got her start as a Girl Friday — a term coined in 1940 for what we now know as an executive assistant. A Radcliff educated go-getter, Winslow quickly tired of “doing all the dirty work” at D.C. based Ferris and Company so six months in she became a Registered Representative of the New York Stock Exchange. Today, Winslow is 84 and manages close to $200 million worth of assets at RBC Wealth Management, mostly working with clients nearing retirement age (though Winslow proves that is not always synonymous with nearing retirement).

A lot has changed during her six-decade career. To name just one: the S&P 500 finished 1955 at 45.5 points. This summer it crossed 2,000 for the first time. Nevertheless, when choosing stocks Winslow continues to depend on a few faithful principles she learned long ago – many of these drawn from unexpected sources like her mother-in-law, the hair care aisle of the drug store and her washing machine.

Sometime in the early 1960s Winslow called her mother-in-law to suggest she sell some stock. The market was getting “toppy.” Her mother-in-law pulled out her portfolio and asked, “Do you think Chase Manhattan is going to cut their dividend?” Winslow said no. “Do you think General Motors is going to cut their dividend?” No again. They went through every holding before the older woman declared, “I think I’ll just continue to hold.”

(For what it is worth, in 2000, Chase merged with J.P. Morgan, forming mega bank JPMorgan Chase. The company still pays a dividend; its most recent payout was 40 cents a share. For its part, General Motors cut its long standing dividend in June 2008 part of an attempt to save money before its 2009 bankruptcy. A quarterly dividend was reinstated earlier this year at 30 cents a share.)

Looking back, Winslow says in that moment she learned that income is the difference between a speculator and an investor. “Investors say they want their stocks to go up,” says Winslow, “but they really don’t want them to go down.”

Winslow knew innately that women of the day were largely conservative, and with just one other female in the office, found herself uniquely qualified to help Washington’s high power women — researchers at the National Institute of Health, high ranking women in the military and wives of Senators (the nation had just one female senator in the 1960s). “They didn’t want to lose what they had. So I dealt early on with large American corporations that had proven track records.”

When Winslow got her start members of the Baby Boomer generation (born 1946 to 1964) were entering their teenage years. They liked, “Toni Home Permanents,” – hair perms – “bathing suits, potato chips, Frito Lay and Gillette.” Products, she says, that mothers were buying for their teens or helping them use. With 10,000 Baby Boomers now turning 65 each day Winslow is drawn to health care stocks and senior housing REITs.

These days Winslow also looks to the generation of 80 million born after 1980 for inspiration – the Millennials. With Millennials reluctant to purchase homes, Winslow is wary of housing stocks but intrigued by the rental industry. Pointing out that in her day “you put a cigarette in your mouth at 14,” she notes that young people today are health conscious, so avoids cigarette companies and looks to food companies that seem to be taking advantage of trends toward nutritious and natural.

Another thing Millennials love? Technology — and Winslow is a fan too. She has held Intel, Microsoft and IBM for decades. Apple has been in her portfolio for 15 years. (Apple shares are up 3,600% since September 1999.) Winslow is currently intrigued by driverless cars and other technologies that improve safety. For Winslow though, technology does not include just computer companies and complex software.

"Early on in the 50s new products came out and many of them were products used by women in the home – including detergent,” recalls Winslow. “Before that we used ivory soap which we squashed around and which left scum. When Tide came out I thought, ‘wow, is this great.’

While she is still a fan of dividend payers for her contemporaries, she tells her grandchildren and their fellow Millennials to look for stocks with increasing earnings. Management, she says, should be investing profits back into company growth rather than paying out a high percentage in dividends.


An article from Forbes

http://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2014/07/30/the-recession-generation-how-millennials-are-changing-money-management-forever/

Sunday 14 September 2014

A Warren Buffet styled “Investment checklist”


A Warren Buffet styled “Investment checklist” 

http://davidparmenter.com/files/buffet-checklist-v4.pdf



A Warren Buffet styled “Investment checklist”
Business tenets
1. Is the business understandable?
2. Do you know how the money is made?
3. Does the business have a consistent operating history?
4. Does the company have favourable long term prospects?
5. Is there a big moat around the business (a high threshold of entry) ?
6. Is it a business that even a dummy could make money in?
7. Can current operations be maintained without too much needing to be spent?
8. Is the company free to adjust prices to inflation?
9. Have you read the annual reports of the main competitors?

Management tenets
10.Has the management demonstrated a high degree of integrity (honesty)?
11.Has the management demonstrated a high degree of intelligence?
12.Has the management demonstrated a high degree of energy?
13.Is management rational?
14.Is management candid with shareholders (evidence in the past of open disclosure to the shareholders when there have been problems)?
15.Has management resisted the temptation to grow quickly by merger?
16.Has management the strength not to follow the institutional imperatives ( avoid following current business and sector fads)?
17.Has the business been free of a major merger in the last 3 years ( many merger failures come out of the woodwork within this period) ?
18.Are stock options tied to SMT performance rather organisation’s performance (if your team wins you do not pay a .35 hitter the same as a .15 hitter.) ?
19.Are stock options treated as an expense?
Financial tenets
20.Is the return on equity adequate? 
21.Is the company conservatively financed?
22.Has the company had a track record of earnings growth in most years above the stock market average?
23.Are the profit margins attractive (better than industry)?
24.Has the company created at least one dollar of market value for every dollar of earnings retained?
Value tenets
25.Is the value of discounted earnings greater than the current market value?
26.Have you discounted at a rate equal or greater than the 10 year bond rate (risk free rate) ?
27.Have cash flows been based on net income, plus






depreciation, depletion, and amortization, less capital expenditure and additional working capital requirements?

28.Has the company been temporarily punished for a specific risk that is not a long term risk (the market tends to over punish the share price)?