Sunday 14 March 2010

How important is critical illness cover?


How important is critical illness cover?

With one in every five critical illness claims for breast cancer now could be the time to make sure you have the right protection.

Most home buyers purchase life assurance when they arrange a mortgage, but only a minority obtain another form of financial protection that they are five times more likely to need before they reach retirement.
Critical illness assurance pays a tax-free lump sum on diagnosis of any one of a list of serious illnesses – including cancer and heart attacks. Claims statistics suggest you are five times more likely to suffer from one of these than you are to die before you reach 65.
The good news is that medical advances mean more people than ever are surviving conditions that might have killed earlier generations. For example, more than 90pc of men diagnosed with testicular cancer are still alive five years later, while more than 80pc of women diagnosed with breast cancer have the same survival rate, according to the Office for National Statistics.
Critical illness cover can provide cash to allow people to pursue a less stressful lifestyle while they recover from illness, or use it for any other purpose. But half of women in Britain have no life assurance, critical illness cover or income protection and a quarter rely on their partner's policies instead, according to a survey by Axa.
But with one in every five claims for critical illness cover for breast cancer, and about 46,000 people diagnosed each year, now is the time to make sure you have the right protection.
Critical illness is relatively cheap and, on the face of it, relatively straightforward. You insure a fixed sum at the outset – usually the outstanding balance on your mortgage – this is paid out on the diagnosis of one of the 30 or so conditions listed on the policy.
But why do very few woman have this protection?
This cover has come in for repeated criticism in recent years as many consumers have complained that insurers rely on complex medical definitions to decide who does and does not get a payout. To be fair to insurers, most have clearly listed the exact nature of the conditions covered in the policy terms and conditions. But to the average healthy consumer, terms such as "in situ carcinoma" or "pre-malignant or non-invasive cancer" are nearly meaningless. Most simply assume that if they have bought a policy it will pay out if they have cancer.
If you bought the policy from an independent financial adviser, they should explain that they only cover certain conditions, and that these conditions have to be of a specified severity to qualify for a payout.
Kevin Carr, spokesman from PruProtect, said: "Breast cancer is covered by critical illness policies, but many policies exclude 'early stage cancer' which is when cancer is considered to be non-invasive. Breast cancer may be considered 'early stage' even if a lumpectomy or mastectomy is required and therefore many insurers will not pay out. The other main exclusions are for certain types of prostate and skin cancer."
However, he said that there are a few insurers such as PruProtect, Axa, Royal Liver and Skandia who look at cases on a severity basis and will pay anything from 10pc to 100pc of the sum assured, depending on the condition.
Prudential takes a slightly different approach with its "serious illness" policy. It will make reduced payments to those with less severe types of breast cancer and other conditions typically not covered on a standard critical illness policy. Those buying a critical illness policy have the option of renewable or guaranteed premiums.
The latter are more expensive, but you know payments will remain level throughout the life of the policy – which may run for 20 years. Renewable premiums may be lower, but prices could rise if, for example, new screening methods result in more claims.
Mr Carr said: "Critics of this system say that it is too confusing for customers, but we disagree. When you break your wing mirror on your car, your car insurer does not pay out the total value of your vehicle. Our system is basic common sense."
Many insurers will have a detailed guide to the illnesses and conditions covered, which will be written clearly. Ask to see this, as well as the document setting out the policy's key features, benefits and exclusions.
Most people buy critical illness cover when they take on a major financial commitment, but it's important not to buy the first policy offered – shop around.
It also pays to start young when premiums will be relatively cheap, rather than leaving it until later in life when the price of cover will start to rise substantially.
Matt Morris, policy adviser at independent financial advisers LifeSearch, said: "Once you take out a critical illness policy, it is not usually worth making any changes to it and you have to be very careful when switching critical illness policies. But if you do, it is crucial you never cancel an existing policy until a new one is in place."
Survivors of cancer who want to take out this type of cover need not pay more than they have to, as Bupa, Fortis, LV= and Zurich will cut a client's premium if they exclude cancer from a policy.
There are more than 200 types of cancer, according to charity Cancer Research UK, and one in three people will develop some form of cancer during their lifetime.
Michael Whyte, chief underwriter for Aviva, said: "Critical illness and life policies are the type of policy nobody wishes to
need to claim against, yet evidence shows that these are vitally important policies that can support families and secure their financial wellbeing during the worst of times."
October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month. To make a donation to Cancer Research UK, call 08701 602040 or send a cheque to: Cancer Research UK, PO Box 1527, Oxford, OX4 9FG

Eurozone could risk 'sovereign debt explosion'


Eurozone could risk 'sovereign debt explosion'

Europe's governments are at increasing risk of an interest rate shock this year as the lingering effects of the Great Recession drive debt issuance to record levels and saturate bond markets, according to Standard & Poor's.

Colosseum - Eurozone could risk 'sovereign debt explosion'
Italy has to refinance 20pc of its entire debt, tapping the bond markets for a total ?259bn this year
"Debt-related sovereign vulnerabilities have increased, particularly in the Eurozone, where we expect government borrowing will rise to further new peaks," said Kai Stukenbrock, the ratings agency's European credit analyst. "The resulting fiscal pressure from a sustained increase in financing cost could be significant in our view."
The warning comes as bond giant PIMCO spoke of a "sovereign debt explosion" that has taken the world into uncharted waters and poses a major threat to economic stability. "Our sense is that the importance of the shock to public finances in advanced economies is not yet sufficiently appreciated and understood," said Mohamed El-Erian, the group's chief executive.
Mr El-Erian said most analysts are still using "backward-looking models" that fail to grasp the full magnitude of what has taken place in world affairs since the crisis. Some 40pc of the global economy is in countries where governments are running deficits above 10pc of GDP, with no easy way out.
Standard & Poor's said Europe's states need to raise €1,446bn (£1,313bn) this year as the full damage inflicted by the credit collapse – masked last year by emergency stimulus measures – becomes ever clearer. This will become harder to fund cheaply as central banks start to tighten. "We believe that benchmark yields have benefited from liquidity injections into the financial sector and quantitative easing measures by the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve. As that support could eventually be withdrawn from 2010, excess supply in government bond markets could start driving benchmark yields back up. Such a development could add to fiscal pressure in a number of sovereigns with high deficits," it said.
Several states have come to rely on cheap short-term funding, storing up "roll-over risk" that will come to a head in coming months. Italy has to refinance 20pc of its entire debt – the world's third largest after Japan and the US – tapping the bond markets for a total €259bn this year. Belgium has to roll over 22pc of its substantial debt.
"This implies dependence on more or less constant access to financial markets," said the report.
Weaker states risk a double effect of rising yields on benchmark bonds as well as higher spreads as investors demand a greater risk premium in the harsher climate now facing heavily-indebted countries.
Greece has already seen a surge of 300 basis points in its long-term funding costs since the new Pasok government of George Papandreou revealed that the country's true budget deficit was 12.7pc, double the previous estimate.
The agency estimates that a sustained rise in yields of 300 basis points would raise the burden of interest costs each year by 3.9pc of GDP for Greece, 2.6pc for Portugal, and 2.5pc for Italy and Britain by the middle of the decade.
A jump of this kind would amount to an extra £35bn or so in annual interest costs, roughly equal to the UK defence budget. This would play havoc with UK public finances and force the Government to squeeze fiscal policy even further. S&P's warning clearly underscores the risk of waiting too long before restoring the deficit to a sustainable path.
The report said there had been a notable increase in "alternative channels of borrowing" that "embellish" the true debt picture. France's Société de Financement de l'Economie (SFEF) has issued €77bn of state-backed bonds since 2008 and the Caisse d'Amortissement de la Dette Sociale has amassed liabilities of €103bn. Austria's infrastructure financing companies, used to buttress state stimulus programmes, have €23bn in debts.
This hidden iceberg of debt kept off balance sheet is likely to be the next focus of bond vigilantes.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7424555/Eurozone-could-risk-sovereign-debt-explosion.html

Saturday 13 March 2010

Government to speed up reform of overseas tax


Government to speed up reform of overseas tax

Businesses may have to rethink their overseas expansion plans after the Treasury signalled it would accelerate plans to reform the way that it taxes the profits earned by companies' foreign branches.

 
Stephen Timms, the financial secretary to the Treasury, told accountants in London last week that the Government would clarify the taxation of overseas profits from branches and legislate in next year's Finance Bill.
Branches are permanent offices in overseas markets but are not structured in the same way as formal subsidiaries. They are used by a wide range of trading businesses as well as banks and insurance companies.
Ian Young, international tax manager at the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales, welcomed the Treasury's decision to tackle branch taxation more quickly.
"It's very sensible," he said. "We need to have a coherent tax system that they don't keep chopping and changing and modifying, which is what they seem to do at the moment. What businesses like is having some certainty."
The Association of British Insurers agreed. Kerrie Kelly, director general of the ABI, said: "A more modern regime will help global businesses remain headquartered in the UK as well as attract those domiciled abroad."
One impact could be that setting up an overseas presence becomes more expensive, Mr Young warned, as losses generated by an overseas office as it sets up could no longer be offset against UK profits.
"If we say you do something abroad we will not tax you, arguably you will not get relief if you make losses," he said. "It might discourage people as when you set up a business you have lots of expenses and not a lot of profits, or it could encourage you to do it in a different way, perhaps through a local agent."

Pound up as UK inflation expectations rise


Pound up as UK inflation expectations rise

Sterling rose on Thursday after a slight uptick in inflation expectations, though analysts still expected economic and political concerns to keep the pound under pressure ahead of an upcoming general election.

 
Pound up as UK inflation expectations rise
Pound up as UK inflation expectations rise Photo: PA
The pound skidded to one-week lows against the dollar and euro on Wednesday after below-forecast manufacturing output figures added to a string of disappointing data.
But Britons' expectations for inflation over the next 12 months rose slightly, a survey from the Bank of England showed on Thursday, helping to underpin sterling, albeit temporarily.
"Inflation expectations showed a modest uptick and sterling has moved up on the day, but this is not overly significant. I don't think it will have any impact on Bank of England policy ahead," said Lee Hardman, currency strategist at BTM-UFJ.
Hardman added sterling's bounce was most likely flow-driven, reiterating his bearish stance on the pound going into a UK general election, widely expected in May.
At 1139 GMT, sterling was trading up around 0.4pc versus the dollar at $1.5050, off a one-week low of $1.4873 hit on Wednesday. Euro/sterling was down around 0.4pc at 90.75 pence, retreating from a high of 91.30 hit on Wednesday.
The Bank of England's trade-weighted sterling index edged up to 76.7 after falling to a fresh 11-month low at 76.4 on Wednesday. Sterling has fallen 7pc on a trade-weighted basis from its January highs.
Analysts remained jittery the threat of a hung parliament after the election would stymie efforts to deal with the UK's spiralling budget deficit.
Adding to the negative mix was concern over Britain's sovereign ratings after Fitch Ratings highlighted on Tuesday the UK's deteriorating credit profile.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown said on Wednesday he believed Britain would maintain its coveted top credit rating and announced a pay freeze for top civil servants to help tame a record deficit.
But worries over the public finances prevailed, with the deficit heading for 12pc of GDP this fiscal year.
"Markets are currently not very receptive to an overly casual approach to national finances. As a result the period of weakness in sterling is likely to continue," said Commerzbank analysts in a note.
Data releases in the UK are now sparse ahead of BoE minutes and employment data due next Wednesday.

Get critical illness cover for peace of mind


Get critical illness cover for peace of mind

Illnesses that used to be fatal are now survivable, so it makes sense to protect yourself from the fallout.


Phil Smith received £1.2m payout from his critical illness insurance after being diagnosed with skin cancer. He now has the all-clear and his family has financial security. Photo: Christopher Jones
Nearly two-thirds of the population have no form of financial protection if they die or become critically ill, despite advances in medicine and technology that mean more people are living longer and surviving illnesses that used to be fatal. In research conducted by insurer Aviva, most people aged 45 to 54, the age group most likely to claim, say they cannot afford protection.
But a debilitating illness can take years to recover from – and while your company may readily allow you sick leave, it can be restricted to a pay percentage or term length. Without a source of income, family savings can quickly dwindle on the essentials – let alone expensive medical care, or unexpected costs.






















Although most homebuyers take out life cover to ensure loved ones are provided for in the event of their death, few people realise the financial implications of surviving – but in serious ill health.
"The diagnosis of a life-threatening illness can mean you will have to give up work temporarily or permanently and you may decide to pay for complementary treatments that are not available through the NHS to aid your recovery," warned Stephen Crosbie, of Aegon. "You're also still likely to incur costs such as mortgage repayments, loan repayments, utility bills and other living expenses."
Critical illness cover typically provides an individual with a lump-sum payment or monthly income if they survive for at least 14 days after being diagnosed with an illness that meets the policy's criteria. These can include cancer, Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, organ transplants, a stroke or heart attack among others. Cover cannot be purchased for a pre-existing illness and the younger and healthier you are, the lower your monthly premium – so it pays to be prepared. Premiums can be guaranteed or reviewable, meaning monthly payments are fixed for the term of the policy or can change on an annual basis. Customers can choose which type is best for them depending on their needs, as reviewable rates are initially cheaper, but the rates are reviewed every five years at which point they could increase. Guaranteed rates ensure customers pay the same premiums throughout the life of the policy.
As technology allows us to live longer, illness blights lives. Assuming you will be one of the lucky few is not practical – nearly two thirds of the population has not bought any form of protection, such as life insurance or critical illness cover, but one in three of us will be diagnosed with cancer, and every year about 146,000 people in Britain have a heart attack. Each year, 10,000 people under the age of 55 suffer a stroke.
Axa says that the average age at which people claim for critical illness cover is 43 for a man and 40 for a woman – a time when expenses are high, with children still at home and a mortgage outstanding. This means that without cover they may struggle.
You can buy critical illness cover in conjunction with life cover, and some company health policies include it as standard, so it is advisable to check what cover you have before taking out a new policy. Some life insurance policies may pay out if you are diagnosed with a terminal illness – but not if it is in the final year of the benefit term. If you are self-employed or run your own business, critical illness cover will not just protect your family should you become ill, but your business, too. Company policies may pay for your bills and mortgage, but they often won't stretch to other expenses such as child care or travel. Aviva offers ''integrated'' critical illness cover that includes life cover to a selected sum – usually the amount outstanding on the policy holder's mortgage.
When buying a critical illness cover, consider whether the policy matches your needs. For example, some insurers will automatically include children's critical illness cover to your plan – while others will have an option to include a spouse. You may want overseas cover should you spend time abroad, or are planning to retire overseas.
All of these inclusions will affect your premiums. Because of the individual requirements of a policy, these quotes from Axa are generalised, but

  • a monthly premium for a healthy, non-smoking, 40-year-old male requiring £150,000 of critical illness cover over a 20-year term is £77. 
  • The monthly premium for a healthy, non-smoking, 40-year-old female requiring £150,000 over a 20-year term is £73. 
  • In comparison with life insurance, a monthly premium for a healthy, non-smoking, 40-year-old female requiring £150,000 of life cover over a 20-year term is £12. 
  • The monthly premium for a healthy, non-smoking, 40-year-old male requiring £150,000 of life cover over a 20-year term is £15.
Life cover may be affordable, but you are much more likely to become seriously ill than die before you reach retirement age.
To illustrate how the later you leave it, the more expensive cover is, just five years on, 

  • Axa's quote for a non-smoking male aged 45 years, based on a smaller benefit of £100,000 over a 20-year term, is £85 a month. 
  • Fortis quotes the same individual £75 a month, and 
  • PruProtect £96.
Statistics show that the number of critical illness claims paid out is increasing. In the past, insurers would have required a letter from the claimant's doctor detailing their full medical history. Due to new guidelines from the Association of British Insurers, now assurers require only medical details relating to the critical illness claim – so you are less likely to have your claim about cancer dismissed because of your non-disclosure about an ingrown toenail.
Additional information may be required if the insurer suspects the claim is fraudulent or the claimant is guilty of non-disclosure. 

  • Non-disclosure can lead to a claim being dismissed, but only if the insurer can prove it was deliberate. 
  • Alternatively, innocent or negligent non-disclosure relating to a misleading question or misinterpretation of the application form can still result in a payout.
It is not worth risking voiding your policy over misinterpretation, however, so it is always advisable to contact the insurer with any questions.
Do you require Life Insurance?
Telegraph Life Insurance, provided by Click, enables you to compare prices from major life insurances in one simple call. To find more, please call 0800 180 4158 or visit life-insurance.telegraph.co.uk.

Related Articles



Nasdaq 10 years on: how the tech sector went from boom to bust


Nasdaq 10 years on: how the tech sector went from boom to bust

A decade after the end of the tech boom, the sector is undergoing a renaissance – and fund managers and investors have sharpened up their stock-picking skills.

Nasdaq 10 years on: how the tech sector went from boom to bust
Nasdaq 10 years on: how the tech sector went from boom to bust Photo: REUTERS
A decade ago the technology bubble was about to burst, having reached a peak on March 10. The golden goose that had been so hyped up by everyone from independent financial advisers to first-time investors crashed and burned.
At the height of the technology boom in the UK there were 35 investment funds in the sector; now there are just 10, with the smallest holding only £3m under management. An outlay of £1,000 in the worst performing fund- Axa Framlington Global Technology, just before the crash a decade ago would now be worth a paltry £244.


At the start of the millennium investors could not get enough of technology. The huge returns that the sector had seen in the previous five years created a buzz that investors found irresistible. If you had invested £1,000 in the sector five years before the crash and cashed in your investment in March 2000 you would have seen your investment grow tenfold – and in the 10 years previously if you had picked your stocks right you could have turned £1,000 into £100,000.
By far the most popular fund at the time was Aberdeen Technology, the fund with the best track record. Ben Rogoff, now manager of Polar Capital's Technology trust, was on Aberdeen team during the technology rush. "Investors and managers alike were clamouring for technology funds," he said. "The attitude was that old investment truism- the only thing worse than losing money is watching someone else make it."
In the first three months of 2000, £567m was poured into tech funds- 10pc of all the money invested in unit trusts over that period. British technology funds totalled £3.4bn – £3bn more than the amount invested at the end of 1998, and with £1bn of the total being invested in February and March alone.
The deregulation of the telecommunications industry in both America and Britain in the mid-Nineties sparked the upturn as new companies were launched to rival BT and AT&T. Roads were dug up to lay cables and demand for technology increased. The launch of the Microsoft's Windows 95 software made the internet accessible to households and not just companies.
Telecoms companies' share prices increased as demand grew and technology funds returned profits. New internet browsers were launched and companies 'piggybacking' on BT lines were set up to cash in on the demand for the web at home.
The 'Y2K' phenomenon – also known as the millennium bug – forced companies to upgrade their computer systems as old systems' date functions were based the last two digits of the year and were said not to have the capability to work after 1999. This also generated cash for the industry, and led to a period of very rapid growth for the technology sector.
Hungry for their piece of the cash cow, 'blue sky' companies were launched, raising capital off the back of nothing more than a business plan and hugely inflated valuations.
Mr Rogoff recalls how in early 2000 Aberdeen saw as much money invested in just three days as half of the fund's total worth when he joined in 1998. "It seems unreal now, looking back. Unless you were there it is difficult to explain," he said. "I do have regrets."
The sector was flooded with capital and companies couldn't deliver their projected earnings. The industry reached saturation point and the market crashed.
"All our contacts were in IT departments," said Stuart O'Gorman, the manager of Henderson's Global Technology fund. "They were saying this and that were the next big thing. People got ahead of themselves and spending and projections were overly optimistic."
It wasn't just the technology funds that suffered in the dotcom crash. Many ordinary funds had high exposure to tech stocks. For example, Dresdner's RCM Europe fund, Invesco's European and Henderson Small Companies funds were among those to have almost three-quarters of their respective portfolios in technology-related stocks.
Of the companies launched during the dotcom boom, the vast majority are no longer around today. Similarly, most of the funds have merged or been closed. But in the past five years the technology sector has slowly been growing in value, outperforming the average unit trust and emerging unscathed from the global market crash of the past couple of years.
The technology sector is debt-free, and finally proving to be a driving force in the economy. When Amazon.com was launched, commentators assumed that it would mean the instant death of the high street bookstore. While that prediction proved to be overstated, Amazon has grown to be a retailing giant.
Mr O'Gorman said: "My mentor Paul Kleiser, former manager of the Henderson fund, always used to say, 'The problem with technology is everything that is predicted happens, but always five years later than promised.' I think that's definitely true."
One example that proves Mr Kleiser's point is 3G mobile technology. Five years ago 3G phones were bricklike, and consumers were being sold the idea that soon we would all be walking along the road video calling one another. This idea never took off but Apple's iPhone, which utilises 3G technology, has revolutionised the mobile phone market.
Consumers can now get home-speed internet on their mobiles, wherever they are, using technology that was developed nearly a decade ago.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/7414651/Nasdaq-10-years-on-how-the-tech-sector-went-from-boom-to-bust.html

Introduction to Page Elements

1 Year Later: Where Are The Value Stocks?


1 Year Later: Where Are The Value Stocks?
By: Zacks Investment Research   Friday, March 12, 2010 3:29 PM

For value investors, this week's one-year anniversary of the "bottom" of the stock market is truly the best of times and the worst of times.
A year ago, stocks were cheap. It was a value investor's dream as P/E ratios fell well below the historic norm. Almost all stocks were suddenly value stocks as panic gripped the Street.
And now, this market appears to be the value investor's worst nightmare.
The mega-rally literally lifted all stocks, which has been great for investor portfolios. When it comes to value investing though, the rally changed the landscape dramatically as even stocks that would normally lag the market surged sharply higher.
But there is hope for the value investor. Value investing isn't dead. Undervalued stocks are still out there. It's just a matter of digging deeper than usual to find them.
Look Beyond the P/E Ratio
Most value investors know to look at the price-to-earnings ratio (or P/E) to find stocks that are undervalued. To find true value: the lower the P/E, the more undervalued the stock.
Many value investors use a P/E under 20. This method to search for value stocks is a great starting point in normal markets, but stocks are more expensive now.
So while you should start with the P/E ratio, don't end there. You're going to need some more tools in your arsenal to find the true value stocks.
3 Tools to Dig Deeper for Value Stocks
1) Use Price-to-Sales
Many value investors neglect the sales component, but sales cannot be easily manipulated. There are no "charges" or "exclusions" or other accounting hocus pocus with sales. They usually are what they are; and they're easy to compare quarter over quarter and year over year. The healthier the sales growth of an organization, the healthier its potential for profit growth. The lower the Price to Sales ratio (P/S), the better. So look for stocks with a P/S ratio of less than 1.
2) Growth is still your friend
Growth? For value investors? Yes, value investors can use the PEG ratio to find growth stocks trading at reasonable prices. As you probably already know, the PEG ratio is simply the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) divided by earnings growth. The lower the PEG ratio, the more undervalued the stock is. So look for stocks with PEG ratios under 1.
3) Look at the Industry Rank
This is a little known factor that, when used with value metrics, can give you powerful results. Zacks ranks industries according to improving earnings prospects, so value investors can look at the Industry Rank lists to get an idea of which industries have rising earnings estimates. The Zacks Industry Rank is the average of the Zacks Rank for all companies in the industry.
Just like with the Zacks Rank, the lower it is the better. So a Zacks Industry Rank of 1.00 is better than one of 4.35.


Value Is King in Bull and Bear Markets
Numerous studies of various bull and bear markets around the world come to one conclusion: it may not be glamorous, but value investing outperforms growth investing over the long term.
Is it any surprise that one of the greatest investors of all time, Warren Buffett, is a value investor?
Now is the time to stay the course. Rally or no rally, value is still king.
Digging for Value Every Day
I know how frustrating it is to try and find value stocks as the markets continue to climb. I seek out value stocks every trading day with the Zacks Value Trader trading service, and some days there just isn't much to get excited about. But all it takes is finding a hidden gem here or there for a value investor to really profit.
Just a few days ago, for instance, I added a big international oil company to the Value Traderportfolio. It has great "digging deep" value fundamentals, such as a price-to-sales ratio of just 1.08 and a forward P/E of 11. It also has a Zacks Industry Rank of 2.20, placing it 20th out of 264.
The Value Trader dug deep to find great stocks during last year's rally. The portfolio returned 47.5% last year, which is nearly double the S&P 500 over the same time period, proving that value hasn't gone away, you just have to know where to look.
I invite you to see what stocks are in the portfolio and learn the secrets behind the Value Trader's success. You'll want to look into this right away because the remaining spots in the service are quickly being snapped up. There's a special savings that ends at 11:59 pm Saturday, March 13.
About Zacks Value Trader
Best,
Tracey Ryniec

http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/3943707

The most important determinants of your success in investing

The most important determinants of your success in investing are QVM:

QUALITY - the quality of the company you own,

VALUE - the price you paid for your stock, and,

MANAGEMENT - the integrity of its management.