Everything Buffett Needs to Know, He Learned Right Here
By Morgan Housel
July 17, 2009
Millions of investors chase Warren Buffett. Tens of thousands attend Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) annual shareholder meetings. Wealthy fans bid millions of dollars to have lunch with him. His appearances on CNBC bring trading floors to a halt. People want to know what he's thinking. Why he's different. What secret has made him so much more successful than anyone else.
What's interesting -- and a little ironic -- is that Buffett has never held back what his secret is. As he recently told PBS:
I read a book, what is it, almost 60 years ago roughly, called The Intelligent Investor and I really learned all I needed to know about investing from that book, and particular chapters 8 and 20 … I haven't changed anything since.
One book. Two chapters. Legendary success.
You'd think such precisely guided advice would draw more attention. Not only has Buffett filtered his success down to one book, he's even listed the two specific chapters on which he built his wisdom. He's making this almost embarrassingly easy for us.
What bits of sage advice do these two chapters -- published in 1949 by Buffett's early mentor Ben Graham -- hold? Here are key points from each one.
Chapter 8: The Investor and Market Fluctuations
Markets go up. Markets go down. Most of us accept this fact until we experience the latter, at which time we throw up our hands and consider the whole thing a sham.
That kind of behavior is what Chapter 8 is all about: dealing with market movements, and how fundamental they are to investing success.
We have a tendency to become confident and invest the most money after stocks have logged big gains, and vice versa -- selling in panic after big drops. Two seconds of logical thought will tell you this isn't rational. Yet we do it over and over again.
Buffett built his success on exploiting the market's movements, rather than following them with lemming-like obedience. He bought companies like Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) when the market wanted nothing to do with them. He then sat on his hands and laughed when companies like Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) and Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) soared during the dot-com boom, ignoring heckles about his technophobic incompetence. It's truly as simple as "being greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy."
Here's how Graham puts it in Chapter 8:
The true investor scarcely ever is forced to sell his shares, and at all other times he is free to disregard the current price quotation. He need pay attention to it and act upon it only to the extent that it suits his book, and no more. Thus the investor who permits himself to be stampeded or unduly worried by unjustified market declines in his holdings is perversely transforming his basic advantage into a basic disadvantage. That man would be better off if his stocks had no market quotation at all, for he would then be spared the mental anguish caused him by other persons' mistakes of judgment.
Chapter 20: Margin of Safety as the Central Concept of Investment
Graham opens Chapter 20 with a potent message:
In the old legend the wise men finally boiled down the history of mortal affairs into the single phrase, 'This too will pass.' Confronted with a like challenge to distill the secret of sound investment into three words, we venture the motto, MARGIN OF SAFETY.
We have an overwhelming urge to expect certainty, but live in a world that is anything but. Forward-looking projections of a stock's value are based on assumptions, prone to wild miscalculations and unforeseen events. And by prone, I mean 100% assured.
There's only one surefire solution to this: Pay far less for stocks than your estimate of value, leaving room for error. That's a margin of safety. It's giving yourself room to be wrong, knowing that you probably will be. Think a company is worth $50 a share? Great. Don't pay more than $25 for it. Think a company could earn $2 per share next year? Great. Set yourself up so you'll profit if it only makes a buck. There has to be a wide range of acceptance between the projected and the potential.
One stock that might epitomize the opposite of a margin of safety is Visa (NYSE: V). Visa is a great company, to be sure, exploiting a global consumer shifting from paper to plastic transactions. But it currently trades at more than 22 times 2009 earnings. My calculations of growth show this is probably what the company is worth if everything goes according to plan.
But what if everything doesn't? What if growth hits a speed bump? What if management drops the ball? What if consumer spending takes a sustained nosedive? What if, what if, what if -- that's the basis of a margin of safety. There has to be sizable room for error.
Moving on
These lessons might seem basic and dull. They are. Yet too many investors fail to implement them. Buffett obviously isn't the only one who's read The Intelligent Investor -- he's simply put its lessons and theories to work in a habitual manner.
Our Motley Fool Inside Value team strives to put these basic values to work with all of its recommendations, which are currently outperforming the market by an average of four percentage points each. To see what we're recommending right now, you can try the service free for 30 days. Click here to get started. There's no obligation to subscribe.
Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Amazon.com and Berkshire Hathaway are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Berkshire Hathaway, Coca-Cola, and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value selections. Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, and has a disclosure policy.
http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2009/07/17/everything-buffett-needs-to-know-he-learned-right-.aspx
Saturday, 25 July 2009
Friday, 24 July 2009
Companies with different EPS GR bought at different prices
Conclusion:
1. Best buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for long haul
2. Good buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a fair price
Held for long haul
3. Good buy:
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for short haul
5. Do not buy
High EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid meantime
Be patient
6. Do not buy
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid
The high CAGR in the early years of the investing period, due to buying at a discount, tended to decline and approach that of the intrinsic EPS GR of the companies over a longer investment time-frame.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=thtZJOZYT-iKNP3VPKg9jig&output=html
Chapter 20 - “Margin of Safety” as the Central Concept of Investment
A single quote by Graham on page 516 struck me:
Observation over many years has taught us that the chief losses to investors come from the purchase of low-quality securities at times of favorable business conditions.
Basically, Graham is saying that most stock investors lose money because they invest in companies that seem good at a particular point in time, but are lacking the fundamentals of a long-lasting stable company.
This seems obvious on the surface, but it’s actually a great argument for thinking more carefully about your individual stock investments. If most of your losses come from buying companies that seem healthy but really aren’t, isn’t that a profound argument for carefully studying any company you might invest in?
1. Best buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for long haul
2. Good buy:
High EPS GR companies
Bought at a fair price
Held for long haul
3. Good buy:
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at a discount
Held for short haul
5. Do not buy
High EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid meantime
Be patient
6. Do not buy
Low EPS GR companies
Bought at high price
Avoid
The high CAGR in the early years of the investing period, due to buying at a discount, tended to decline and approach that of the intrinsic EPS GR of the companies over a longer investment time-frame.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=thtZJOZYT-iKNP3VPKg9jig&output=html
Chapter 20 - “Margin of Safety” as the Central Concept of Investment
A single quote by Graham on page 516 struck me:
Observation over many years has taught us that the chief losses to investors come from the purchase of low-quality securities at times of favorable business conditions.
Basically, Graham is saying that most stock investors lose money because they invest in companies that seem good at a particular point in time, but are lacking the fundamentals of a long-lasting stable company.
This seems obvious on the surface, but it’s actually a great argument for thinking more carefully about your individual stock investments. If most of your losses come from buying companies that seem healthy but really aren’t, isn’t that a profound argument for carefully studying any company you might invest in?
Thursday, 23 July 2009
To map out a course of action and follow it to an end requires courage.
Whatever strategy or strategies you use, the most critical thing in investing is to take a good map with you on your journey and stick to it no matter what. There will be all sorts of distractions along the road to your investment goals. You'll come upon supposed shortcuts that promise to get you where you're going twice as fast. You'll see and hear from all sorts of people who are telling you that they've found a better way to go than the road you're on. Sometimes, you'll even think that your map must be wrong, and that it has you headed in the opposite direction of where you want to go.
But remember, the people who gave you directions - the gurus upon whom some of the strategies are based - are expert mapmakers. They know how to get where you want to go because they've been there before - unlike most of the people who will be telling you to take those shortcuts or alternate routes.
With the map, you have what you need to avoid the obstacles and bad advice along the way, and to do what it takes to beat the market. Remember, while being a good investor is hard, it doesn't have to be complicated. The greatest difficult isn't in the details of stock-picking or portfolio management; you don't have to be a rocket scientist to produce nice returns. No, the hard part will be clearing those psychological and emotional barriers we reviewed, so that you stick to your road map no matter what happens.
If you stick to your roadmap, you should be quite happy with where you end up.
But remember, the people who gave you directions - the gurus upon whom some of the strategies are based - are expert mapmakers. They know how to get where you want to go because they've been there before - unlike most of the people who will be telling you to take those shortcuts or alternate routes.
With the map, you have what you need to avoid the obstacles and bad advice along the way, and to do what it takes to beat the market. Remember, while being a good investor is hard, it doesn't have to be complicated. The greatest difficult isn't in the details of stock-picking or portfolio management; you don't have to be a rocket scientist to produce nice returns. No, the hard part will be clearing those psychological and emotional barriers we reviewed, so that you stick to your road map no matter what happens.
If you stick to your roadmap, you should be quite happy with where you end up.
Investing Principle 6: Stick to the Strategy - Not the Stocks
If a stock no longer meets the fundamental criteria that led you to buy it, don't feel obligated to hold on to it.
You're a long-term investor if you stick to a strategy for the long haul - not because you blindly hold on to individual stocks for long periods.
You're a long-term investor if you stick to a strategy for the long haul - not because you blindly hold on to individual stocks for long periods.
Investing Principle 5: Don't Limit Yourself
Studies show that "style-box" investing can limit your gains by about 300 basis points per year.
Using "strategy-based investing" allows you to pick the best values in the market at any given time, regardless of market cap or growth-value designations.
Using "strategy-based investing" allows you to pick the best values in the market at any given time, regardless of market cap or growth-value designations.
Investing Principle 4: Diversify, but Don't Own the Market
Diversification is good - to a point. Maintain a focussed portfolio that includes enough stocks to limit stock-specific risk, but don't hold so many that you end up simply mirroring the market's returns.
In a rigid fundamental-based investing system, portfolios as small as 10 stocks can significantly beat the market over the long haul.
While you don't need to hold stocks in every sector or industry, set guidelines to make sure you maintain at least some diversification across those areas within your portfolio.
In a rigid fundamental-based investing system, portfolios as small as 10 stocks can significantly beat the market over the long haul.
While you don't need to hold stocks in every sector or industry, set guidelines to make sure you maintain at least some diversification across those areas within your portfolio.
Investing Principle 3: Stay Disciplined Over the Long Haul
It is essential to stick to your strategy for the long term. Even the best strategies have down periods, and it can sometimes take over a year to reap the benefits of a good method. If you try to time your use of a strategy, you'll likely miss out on some big gains.
Expectations shape reactions: be prepared for short-term 10 to 20% downturns that are inevitable in the stock market - and the less frequent but also inevitable 35 to 50% downturns you'll occasionally experience. You can't predict when they will happen, so you just have to roll with them if you want to reap the market's long-term benefits.
Give the Internet a rest. Checking your portfolio every day, let alone every 10 minutes, can make you want to jump in and out of the market, which hurts your long-term performance.
Expectations shape reactions: be prepared for short-term 10 to 20% downturns that are inevitable in the stock market - and the less frequent but also inevitable 35 to 50% downturns you'll occasionally experience. You can't predict when they will happen, so you just have to roll with them if you want to reap the market's long-term benefits.
Give the Internet a rest. Checking your portfolio every day, let alone every 10 minutes, can make you want to jump in and out of the market, which hurts your long-term performance.
Investing Principle 2: Stick to the Numbers
Human emotions cloud decision-making, hampering human beings' forecasting abilities.
Using proven, quantitative strategies allows you to make buy and sell decisions solely on the numbers - a stock's fundamentals - helping to remove emotion from the process.
It is best to stick firmly to strategies that are backed up by long, proven track records.
Using proven, quantitative strategies allows you to make buy and sell decisions solely on the numbers - a stock's fundamentals - helping to remove emotion from the process.
It is best to stick firmly to strategies that are backed up by long, proven track records.
Investing Principle 1: Combining Strategies
Because of compounding, downside volatility costs you money.
If you are looking to smooth out returns, pick stocks with lower degrees of correlation (those that perform differently in the same type of market conditions).
Learn how to combine strategies to limit risk or enhance returns.
To maximise returns, give more weight to those strategies with the best historical track records.
If you are looking to smooth out returns, pick stocks with lower degrees of correlation (those that perform differently in the same type of market conditions).
Learn how to combine strategies to limit risk or enhance returns.
To maximise returns, give more weight to those strategies with the best historical track records.
How can investment returns be improved?
How to improve on my returns on my investing?
Always keep cash for emergency use. Also, always have cash for opportunistic investing. This is not a problem for those who have constant stream of cash incomes. For others, keeping cash:stock in the ratio of 25:75, gives a return quite close to those who are 100% invested into stocks.
Next, would be selecting the right stocks. Using my QVM method, we aim to select stocks that will give us good sustainable returns for a long time. We should aim for a return of 15% per year, if possible, and always going for high probability events that give high returns at low risks. Returns can also be sought from badly beaten down stocks (undervalued stocks) that will give great returns when they are repriced at fair values.
Maintain a concentrated portfolio. Bet big on those stocks you have conviction in. Do not over-diversify. The company specific risks are fully diversified when you have 6 stocks in your portfolio. An additional stock added to the portfolio after the sixth may lead to lower returns without the benefit of reducing further the risks. The market risks cannot be diversified, but can be partially managed through asset allocation.
It is important to manage the portfolio actively. This also incorporates asset allocation. There will be time when the market is bubbly, when one may need to pare down exposure to stocks, though, never completely. There will be times, when one's exposure to stock will be relatively high, especially at the end of a severe and prolonged bear market.
Always monitor the business of the stocks in the portfolio in your readings of the papers, business magazines, etc. Track their business performance every quarter through their regular financial releases.
Two active strategies are employed to improve on the returns of our portfolio. Firstly, the defensive strategy. This is to prevent harm to our portfolio. This occurs when the fundamentals of the business of the stock have deteriorated, sometimes suddenly, for various reasons. Another reason maybe "creative" accounting. In these situations, sell the related stocks quickly. Do not hesistate. Speed in selling is important in reducing severe damage to your portfolio, by limiting the losses.
The next is termed offensive strategy. Of 5 stocks one invest into, expect 1 to perform exceptionally well, 3 to be fairly well and 1 to do "not so well or badly". You have time to apply this strategy leisurely. There is no urgency as like the situation previously described.
Review and rebalance your portfolio at regular intervals. Perhaps, once per month or even less frequent than this. You may wish to sell or trim the stocks where the prices are too high, reducing the upside potential and increasing the downside risk. You may also wish to sell or trim those stocks where the potential for upside gain is assessed to be low. (Remember you aim for 15% return on an annual basis.) The cash derived from their disposals should be re-deployed into those stocks which have a higher potential for gain.
Sounds simple, but trust me, active investing and active management of portfolio are both challenging and take effort. However, the returns can be good for those employing a disciplined investing philosophy and strategy.
Always keep cash for emergency use. Also, always have cash for opportunistic investing. This is not a problem for those who have constant stream of cash incomes. For others, keeping cash:stock in the ratio of 25:75, gives a return quite close to those who are 100% invested into stocks.
Next, would be selecting the right stocks. Using my QVM method, we aim to select stocks that will give us good sustainable returns for a long time. We should aim for a return of 15% per year, if possible, and always going for high probability events that give high returns at low risks. Returns can also be sought from badly beaten down stocks (undervalued stocks) that will give great returns when they are repriced at fair values.
Maintain a concentrated portfolio. Bet big on those stocks you have conviction in. Do not over-diversify. The company specific risks are fully diversified when you have 6 stocks in your portfolio. An additional stock added to the portfolio after the sixth may lead to lower returns without the benefit of reducing further the risks. The market risks cannot be diversified, but can be partially managed through asset allocation.
It is important to manage the portfolio actively. This also incorporates asset allocation. There will be time when the market is bubbly, when one may need to pare down exposure to stocks, though, never completely. There will be times, when one's exposure to stock will be relatively high, especially at the end of a severe and prolonged bear market.
Always monitor the business of the stocks in the portfolio in your readings of the papers, business magazines, etc. Track their business performance every quarter through their regular financial releases.
Two active strategies are employed to improve on the returns of our portfolio. Firstly, the defensive strategy. This is to prevent harm to our portfolio. This occurs when the fundamentals of the business of the stock have deteriorated, sometimes suddenly, for various reasons. Another reason maybe "creative" accounting. In these situations, sell the related stocks quickly. Do not hesistate. Speed in selling is important in reducing severe damage to your portfolio, by limiting the losses.
The next is termed offensive strategy. Of 5 stocks one invest into, expect 1 to perform exceptionally well, 3 to be fairly well and 1 to do "not so well or badly". You have time to apply this strategy leisurely. There is no urgency as like the situation previously described.
Review and rebalance your portfolio at regular intervals. Perhaps, once per month or even less frequent than this. You may wish to sell or trim the stocks where the prices are too high, reducing the upside potential and increasing the downside risk. You may also wish to sell or trim those stocks where the potential for upside gain is assessed to be low. (Remember you aim for 15% return on an annual basis.) The cash derived from their disposals should be re-deployed into those stocks which have a higher potential for gain.
Sounds simple, but trust me, active investing and active management of portfolio are both challenging and take effort. However, the returns can be good for those employing a disciplined investing philosophy and strategy.
Risk comes from misjudgement of a company's prospects, not price volatility
Academics define risk as price volatility, and to counter that risk, they recommend holding a diversified portfolio.
But to value investors, like Warren Buffett, risk is the intrinsic value risk of a business, not the price behaviour of its stock. And intrinsic value risk, he says, comes from misjudgement of a company's prospects. He has extreme confidence in his ability to pick fundamentally strong companies which are trading at prices below their intrinsic value, and thus favours placing big bets on these companies.
You should have the courage and conviction to put at least 10 percent of your net worth into each investment you make, he says. "We believe that a policy of portfolio concentration may well decrease risk if it raises, as it should, both the intensity with which an investor thinks about a business and the comfort level he must feel with its economic characteristics before buying into it," he explains.
Ptui
MCA: Dr M’s remarks not helping racial unity
PETALING JAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Moha-mad’s claim that the Chinese are the masters in the country will not help foster racial harmony, said the MCA.
Thursday July 23, 2009
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/23/nation/4375350&sec=nation
PETALING JAYA: Tun Dr Mahathir Moha-mad’s claim that the Chinese are the masters in the country will not help foster racial harmony, said the MCA.
Thursday July 23, 2009
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/7/23/nation/4375350&sec=nation
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
iCap Portfolios of 2008 and 2009
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tC9bD59Bg2AKPA3Bgfyo8qA&output=html
There are 17 stocks in iCap Portfolio for the financial year ended 31 May 2009. This is the same number of stocks as for the previous financial year ended 31 May 2008.
iCap sold:
- AirAsia,
- Axiata and
- VADS.
2 new stocks were included in the present portfolio at the cost of $ 42.95 million, namely,
- Astro (31% gain), and,
- KLKepong (30.16% gain).
During the last financial year, iCap added more shares at the cost of $ 6.1 million, in 4 pre-existing stocks:
- Boustead (average cost of newly bought shares 3.64, giving 8.17% gain)
- Parkson (average cost of newly bought shares 4.84, giving 13.62% gain)
- PohKong (average cost of newly bought shares 0.36, giving 6.73% gain)
- HaiO (HaiO shares are probably from share dividends).
iCap NAV fell from $1.95 per share on 31 May 2008 to RM 1.77 per share by 31 May 2009 or a loss of 9%. The KLCI declined 18% in the same period.
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
How best to allocate your funds?
To a certain extent, that depends on your risk appetite, which in turn hinges on your individual circumstances.
A risk-averse investor may hold more cash, and a risk-tolerant investor vice-versa.
Allocation will also depend on market conditions.
Equity risk premium can be a good guiding principle for asset allocation decisions, i.e., when to hold cash and when to hold stocks if you are looking at just 2 asset classes.
Even if you have high tolerance for risks, it would be foolish to allocate 80% of your portfolio to equities during a stockmarket bubble.
And even, if the market was "normal" when you allocated your assets, prices will move, leaving you holding more of one asset class than you desire. In which case, you might want to rebalance your portfolio.
Stocks, bonds or cash? How much you hold of each asset class - or asset allocation - is the most important decision in an investment process. Studies have shown that about 95% of variations in returns on portfolios are explained by asset allocation decisions. Only about 5% are due to other causes, such as security selection.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
A risk-averse investor may hold more cash, and a risk-tolerant investor vice-versa.
Allocation will also depend on market conditions.
Equity risk premium can be a good guiding principle for asset allocation decisions, i.e., when to hold cash and when to hold stocks if you are looking at just 2 asset classes.
Even if you have high tolerance for risks, it would be foolish to allocate 80% of your portfolio to equities during a stockmarket bubble.
And even, if the market was "normal" when you allocated your assets, prices will move, leaving you holding more of one asset class than you desire. In which case, you might want to rebalance your portfolio.
Stocks, bonds or cash? How much you hold of each asset class - or asset allocation - is the most important decision in an investment process. Studies have shown that about 95% of variations in returns on portfolios are explained by asset allocation decisions. Only about 5% are due to other causes, such as security selection.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
When is the market over-valued?
The stock market moves in a cycle - from extreme optimism to extreme pessimism. How can you tell when stocks are under or over-valued vis-a-vis bonds or cash? Taking advantage of perceived over or under-valuation of securities in different asset classes can yield spectacular results.
Equity risk premium:
> 3.5%, market is undervalued
< 0.6%, market is overvalued.
0.6% to 3.5%, market is fairly valued.
Equity risk premium is the compensation investors require for holding stocks.
When the economic outlook is bad, or in the aftermath of a catastrophe, the equity risk premium will be high because fear grips investors and they can only be enticed to hold "risky" stocks if the promised returns are good.
Conversely, in good times everyone become over-confident of the continued good performance of stocks and will demand very little compensation to hold them.
Equity risk premium
= earnings yield (1/market PE) - the risk free rate.
Market PE ratios were obtained from Thomson Financial Datastream.
One-year deposit rates were taken as risk-free rates.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
Equity risk premium:
> 3.5%, market is undervalued
< 0.6%, market is overvalued.
0.6% to 3.5%, market is fairly valued.
Equity risk premium is the compensation investors require for holding stocks.
When the economic outlook is bad, or in the aftermath of a catastrophe, the equity risk premium will be high because fear grips investors and they can only be enticed to hold "risky" stocks if the promised returns are good.
Conversely, in good times everyone become over-confident of the continued good performance of stocks and will demand very little compensation to hold them.
Equity risk premium
= earnings yield (1/market PE) - the risk free rate.
Market PE ratios were obtained from Thomson Financial Datastream.
One-year deposit rates were taken as risk-free rates.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
My investment horizon is 10 or 20 years
Those with investment horizons of 10 or 20 years should be ever ready to embrace out-of-favour asset classes.
Time and again, the market has handsomely rewarded those willing to bear equity risk in uncertain times. Extreme pessimism - which leads to swings from the equilibrium - compresses a proverbial spring that will eventually bounce back into equilibrium. The more share price falls, the more return it promises a prospective buyer.
Stocks - short of the company going bankrupt - will very often produce their promised returns eventually; it is the timing that will elude us. So for those with time on their side, they have nothing to lose. In short, having an explicit investment plan supports discipline and helps ensure that an investor is not swayed by panic or overconfidence.
If one is investing for financial independence 20 or 30 years down the road, opportunities that came with Sept 11's after-shocks, the Asian financial crisis, or the recent Lehman crash, are not to be missed.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
Time and again, the market has handsomely rewarded those willing to bear equity risk in uncertain times. Extreme pessimism - which leads to swings from the equilibrium - compresses a proverbial spring that will eventually bounce back into equilibrium. The more share price falls, the more return it promises a prospective buyer.
Stocks - short of the company going bankrupt - will very often produce their promised returns eventually; it is the timing that will elude us. So for those with time on their side, they have nothing to lose. In short, having an explicit investment plan supports discipline and helps ensure that an investor is not swayed by panic or overconfidence.
If one is investing for financial independence 20 or 30 years down the road, opportunities that came with Sept 11's after-shocks, the Asian financial crisis, or the recent Lehman crash, are not to be missed.
Ref: Show Me the Money by Teh Hooi Ling
Bursa Malaysia Aims for 40 Listings a Year, CEO Yusli Says
Bursa Malaysia Aims for 40 Listings a Year, CEO Yusli Says
By Chan Tien Hin
July 21 (Bloomberg) -- Bursa Malaysia Bhd., operator of the nation’s exchange, said it aims to attract as many as 40 new listings a year as the easing of investment rules in the country helps draw foreign investors.
Bursa attracted 23 listings last year and 26 in 2007, down from 40 three years ago, according to its Web site. Only one sold shares for the first time in the first half, it added.
“Over the next six months, if we get the same number as last year, that will be good,” Yusli Yusoff, Bursa’s chief executive officer, said in an interview in Kuala Lumpur. “I don’t see why we can’t continue the momentum, I’ve always said that in any year, we should be looking at 30 to 40 companies.”
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak last month eased investment rules governing initial public offerings and takeovers, scrapping the need for overseas companies and publicly traded Malaysian businesses to set aside 30 percent of their equity to local ethnic Malay investors.
Najib, who took office in April, is overhauling the Southeast Asian nation’s financial markets to attract investors and revive an economy that’s facing its first contraction in a decade. The benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI has risen 30 percent this year, lagging behind regional markets.
The measure’s gap with Southeast Asian indexes may widen. Macquarie Group Ltd. said in a report today that investors should “take profit” in Malaysian stocks as “liquidity and earnings upgrades are showing signs of fatigue.”
‘Big Ones’
Bursa said more than 20 companies are already in the “pipeline” for initial share sales, including a handful of businesses from China, with more expected following the easing of investment rules.
“We expect companies who previously may not have wanted to come to the market because of this condition to now come forward,” Yusli said today. “I want some big ones this year.”
The bourse said discussions with Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges to develop an electronic trading link connecting five markets in the next two to three years are at a “fairly advanced stage.”
Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges signed a preliminary agreement on Feb. 23 to develop a trading link to boost competitiveness and lure more overseas funds into the region.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chan Tien Hin in Kuala Lumpur at thchan@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: July 20, 2009 23:12 EDT
By Chan Tien Hin
July 21 (Bloomberg) -- Bursa Malaysia Bhd., operator of the nation’s exchange, said it aims to attract as many as 40 new listings a year as the easing of investment rules in the country helps draw foreign investors.
Bursa attracted 23 listings last year and 26 in 2007, down from 40 three years ago, according to its Web site. Only one sold shares for the first time in the first half, it added.
“Over the next six months, if we get the same number as last year, that will be good,” Yusli Yusoff, Bursa’s chief executive officer, said in an interview in Kuala Lumpur. “I don’t see why we can’t continue the momentum, I’ve always said that in any year, we should be looking at 30 to 40 companies.”
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak last month eased investment rules governing initial public offerings and takeovers, scrapping the need for overseas companies and publicly traded Malaysian businesses to set aside 30 percent of their equity to local ethnic Malay investors.
Najib, who took office in April, is overhauling the Southeast Asian nation’s financial markets to attract investors and revive an economy that’s facing its first contraction in a decade. The benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI has risen 30 percent this year, lagging behind regional markets.
The measure’s gap with Southeast Asian indexes may widen. Macquarie Group Ltd. said in a report today that investors should “take profit” in Malaysian stocks as “liquidity and earnings upgrades are showing signs of fatigue.”
‘Big Ones’
Bursa said more than 20 companies are already in the “pipeline” for initial share sales, including a handful of businesses from China, with more expected following the easing of investment rules.
“We expect companies who previously may not have wanted to come to the market because of this condition to now come forward,” Yusli said today. “I want some big ones this year.”
The bourse said discussions with Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges to develop an electronic trading link connecting five markets in the next two to three years are at a “fairly advanced stage.”
Southeast Asia’s stock exchanges signed a preliminary agreement on Feb. 23 to develop a trading link to boost competitiveness and lure more overseas funds into the region.
To contact the reporter on this story: Chan Tien Hin in Kuala Lumpur at thchan@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: July 20, 2009 23:12 EDT
Warren Buffett's Priceless Investment Advice
Warren Buffett's Priceless Investment Advice
By John Reeves
July 19, 2009
"It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."
If you can grasp this simple advice from Warren Buffett, you should do well as an investor. Sure, there are other investment strategies out there, but Buffett's approach is both easy to follow and demonstrably successful over more than 50 years. Why try anything else?
Two words for the efficient market hypothesis: Warren Buffett
An interesting academic study (PDF file) illustrates Buffett's amazing investment genius. From 1980 to 2003, the stock portfolio of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) beat the S&P 500 index in 20 out of 24 years. During that same period, Berkshire's average annual return from its stock portfolio outperformed the index by 12 percentage points. The efficient market theory predicts that this is impossible, but the theory is clearly wrong in this case.
Buffett has delivered these outstanding returns by buying undervalued shares in great companies such as Gillette, now owned by Procter & Gamble. Over the years, Berkshire has owned household names such as UPS (NYSE: UPS), Iron Mountain (NYSE: IRM), and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT).
Although not every pick worked out, for the most part Buffett and Berkshire have made a mint. Indeed, Buffett's investment in Gillette increased threefold during the 1990s. Who'd have guessed you could get such stratospheric returns from razors?
The devil is in the details
So buying great companies at reasonable prices can deliver solid returns for long-term investors. The challenge, of course, is identifying great companies and determining what constitutes a reasonable price.
Buffett recommends that investors look for companies that deliver outstanding returns on capital and produce substantial cash profits. He also suggests that you look for companies with a huge economic moat to protect them from competitors. You can identify companies with moats by looking for strong brands that stand alongside consistent or improving profit margins and returns on capital.
How do you determine the right buy price for shares in such companies? Buffett advises that you wait patiently for opportunities to purchase stocks at a significant discount to their intrinsic values -- as calculated by taking the present value of all future cash flows. Ultimately, he believes that "value will in time always be reflected in market price." When the market finally recognizes the true worth of your undervalued shares, you begin to earn solid returns.
Do-it-yourself outperformance
Before they can capture Buffett-like returns, beginning investors will need to develop their skills in identifying profitable companies and determining intrinsic values. In the meantime, consider looking for stock ideas among Berkshire's own holdings.
In the Form 13-F that Berkshire filed recently, we learned that Buffett has boosted his stake in financials, adding to existing positions Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and U.S. Bank (NYSE: USB).
It's pretty clear that Buffett thinks these conservatively run banks represent compelling investment opportunities at the moment. In fact, Buffett claimed in May that if he had to put all of his net worth into a single stock, it would be Wells Fargo.
Despite Buffett's confidence, it's clear that many individual investors are still afraid of financial stocks. If you fall into that camp, another place to find great value-stock ideas is Motley Fool Inside Value. Philip Durell, the advisor for the service, follows an investment strategy very similar to Buffett's.
He looks for undervalued companies that also have strong financials and competitive positions. This approach has allowed Philip to outperform the market since Inside Value's inception in 2004. To see his most recent stock picks, as well as the entire archive of past selections, sign up for a free 30-day trial today.
If investing in wonderful companies at fair prices is good enough for Warren Buffett -- arguably the finest investor on the planet -- it should be good enough for the rest of us.
Already subscribe to Inside Value? Log in at the top of this page.
This article was originally published on April 7, 2007. It has been updated.
John Reeves can't remember the last time he used a razor made by someone other than Gillette, and he wishes he'd owned shares in that company before P&G acquired it. John does not own shares of any companies mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Procter & Gamble. Berkshire and Wal-Mart are Inside Value recommendations. Berkshire is also a Stock Advisor selection. UPS and P&G are Income Investor picks. The Fool has a disclosure policy.
By John Reeves
July 19, 2009
"It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."
If you can grasp this simple advice from Warren Buffett, you should do well as an investor. Sure, there are other investment strategies out there, but Buffett's approach is both easy to follow and demonstrably successful over more than 50 years. Why try anything else?
Two words for the efficient market hypothesis: Warren Buffett
An interesting academic study (PDF file) illustrates Buffett's amazing investment genius. From 1980 to 2003, the stock portfolio of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B) beat the S&P 500 index in 20 out of 24 years. During that same period, Berkshire's average annual return from its stock portfolio outperformed the index by 12 percentage points. The efficient market theory predicts that this is impossible, but the theory is clearly wrong in this case.
Buffett has delivered these outstanding returns by buying undervalued shares in great companies such as Gillette, now owned by Procter & Gamble. Over the years, Berkshire has owned household names such as UPS (NYSE: UPS), Iron Mountain (NYSE: IRM), and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT).
Although not every pick worked out, for the most part Buffett and Berkshire have made a mint. Indeed, Buffett's investment in Gillette increased threefold during the 1990s. Who'd have guessed you could get such stratospheric returns from razors?
The devil is in the details
So buying great companies at reasonable prices can deliver solid returns for long-term investors. The challenge, of course, is identifying great companies and determining what constitutes a reasonable price.
Buffett recommends that investors look for companies that deliver outstanding returns on capital and produce substantial cash profits. He also suggests that you look for companies with a huge economic moat to protect them from competitors. You can identify companies with moats by looking for strong brands that stand alongside consistent or improving profit margins and returns on capital.
How do you determine the right buy price for shares in such companies? Buffett advises that you wait patiently for opportunities to purchase stocks at a significant discount to their intrinsic values -- as calculated by taking the present value of all future cash flows. Ultimately, he believes that "value will in time always be reflected in market price." When the market finally recognizes the true worth of your undervalued shares, you begin to earn solid returns.
Do-it-yourself outperformance
Before they can capture Buffett-like returns, beginning investors will need to develop their skills in identifying profitable companies and determining intrinsic values. In the meantime, consider looking for stock ideas among Berkshire's own holdings.
In the Form 13-F that Berkshire filed recently, we learned that Buffett has boosted his stake in financials, adding to existing positions Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and U.S. Bank (NYSE: USB).
It's pretty clear that Buffett thinks these conservatively run banks represent compelling investment opportunities at the moment. In fact, Buffett claimed in May that if he had to put all of his net worth into a single stock, it would be Wells Fargo.
Despite Buffett's confidence, it's clear that many individual investors are still afraid of financial stocks. If you fall into that camp, another place to find great value-stock ideas is Motley Fool Inside Value. Philip Durell, the advisor for the service, follows an investment strategy very similar to Buffett's.
He looks for undervalued companies that also have strong financials and competitive positions. This approach has allowed Philip to outperform the market since Inside Value's inception in 2004. To see his most recent stock picks, as well as the entire archive of past selections, sign up for a free 30-day trial today.
If investing in wonderful companies at fair prices is good enough for Warren Buffett -- arguably the finest investor on the planet -- it should be good enough for the rest of us.
Already subscribe to Inside Value? Log in at the top of this page.
This article was originally published on April 7, 2007. It has been updated.
John Reeves can't remember the last time he used a razor made by someone other than Gillette, and he wishes he'd owned shares in that company before P&G acquired it. John does not own shares of any companies mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Procter & Gamble. Berkshire and Wal-Mart are Inside Value recommendations. Berkshire is also a Stock Advisor selection. UPS and P&G are Income Investor picks. The Fool has a disclosure policy.
Marc Faber: The next bubble being inflated right now
Faber: Next Stimulus Will Be Worse
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:46 PM
By: Julie Crawshaw Article Font Size
Some economists think that another bubble is what’s needed to get the economy moving again.
Gloom, Boom and Doom publisher Marc Faber said this is ridiculous, and that the Federal Reserve — which he holds responsible for creating the housing bubble — wants to do it all over again.
The central bank should not encourage excessive credit growth, Faber tells Moneynews.com's Dan Mangru in an exclusive interview.
Between 2000 and 2007 the total U.S. credit market debt increased at five times the rate of nominal gross domestic product.
Unfortunately, Faber said, the next bubble is already here. This time it’s government spending and fiscal deficits that Faber thinks will double the government’s debt during the next six years or less.
“The U.S. government is largely deranged,” he said. “The private sector is the dynamic one, and that’s why I object tremendously against building up fiscal deficits because (they) shift economic activity into unproductive government instead of leaving it in the private sector.”
Another stimulus package would only make matters worse.
“In the Depression, they had one stimulus after another and it didn’t help,” Faber said. “What helped was World War II.”
The problem with bubbles, Faber said, is that they only temporarily stimulate the economy.
“The whole economic expansion driven by a bubble in America has been a total disaster and has shifted wealth from the ordinary people who work … to the Wall Street elite,” he said.
Nor does the government score any higher when it comes to managing inflation, which Faber thinks will reach Zimbabwe-like levels in the U.S. courtesy of the Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates too low.
“The Fed, in my opinion, has zilch idea about monetary policy,” Faber said.
“What they focus upon is basically core inflation, which does not include energy and food prices and the way the Fed measures inflation is highly questionable in the first place because when you measure inflation it’s a basket of goods and services.”
When the economy recovers, interest rates should go up because of inflationary pressures, something Faber expects the Fed won’t let happen because it could cause interest payments on the government’s debt to double. Those payments today are slightly below $500 billion annually.
If the global economy collapses in a deflationary spiral, those government deficits actually expand, leading to more central bank-driven monetization, Faber said. And keeping interest rates artificially low will lead to more and more inflation.
Add to all of this the expectation that health care costs will soar and jobless rates will probably continue to be high, and the economic picture becomes even gloomier.
“I think we’ve just gone … to the beginning of the realization that the economy may be bottoming out but not much recovery is forthcoming,” Faber said.
© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/2349/Economy/eml
http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/federal_reserve/2009/07/15/235992.html
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 3:46 PM
By: Julie Crawshaw Article Font Size
Some economists think that another bubble is what’s needed to get the economy moving again.
Gloom, Boom and Doom publisher Marc Faber said this is ridiculous, and that the Federal Reserve — which he holds responsible for creating the housing bubble — wants to do it all over again.
The central bank should not encourage excessive credit growth, Faber tells Moneynews.com's Dan Mangru in an exclusive interview.
Between 2000 and 2007 the total U.S. credit market debt increased at five times the rate of nominal gross domestic product.
Unfortunately, Faber said, the next bubble is already here. This time it’s government spending and fiscal deficits that Faber thinks will double the government’s debt during the next six years or less.
“The U.S. government is largely deranged,” he said. “The private sector is the dynamic one, and that’s why I object tremendously against building up fiscal deficits because (they) shift economic activity into unproductive government instead of leaving it in the private sector.”
Another stimulus package would only make matters worse.
“In the Depression, they had one stimulus after another and it didn’t help,” Faber said. “What helped was World War II.”
The problem with bubbles, Faber said, is that they only temporarily stimulate the economy.
“The whole economic expansion driven by a bubble in America has been a total disaster and has shifted wealth from the ordinary people who work … to the Wall Street elite,” he said.
Nor does the government score any higher when it comes to managing inflation, which Faber thinks will reach Zimbabwe-like levels in the U.S. courtesy of the Fed’s policy of keeping interest rates too low.
“The Fed, in my opinion, has zilch idea about monetary policy,” Faber said.
“What they focus upon is basically core inflation, which does not include energy and food prices and the way the Fed measures inflation is highly questionable in the first place because when you measure inflation it’s a basket of goods and services.”
When the economy recovers, interest rates should go up because of inflationary pressures, something Faber expects the Fed won’t let happen because it could cause interest payments on the government’s debt to double. Those payments today are slightly below $500 billion annually.
If the global economy collapses in a deflationary spiral, those government deficits actually expand, leading to more central bank-driven monetization, Faber said. And keeping interest rates artificially low will lead to more and more inflation.
Add to all of this the expectation that health care costs will soar and jobless rates will probably continue to be high, and the economic picture becomes even gloomier.
“I think we’ve just gone … to the beginning of the realization that the economy may be bottoming out but not much recovery is forthcoming,” Faber said.
© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
http://www.thedailycrux.com/content/2349/Economy/eml
http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/federal_reserve/2009/07/15/235992.html
Monday, 20 July 2009
The biggest assumption and risk for investors: Earning Forecast
The biggest assumption in any valuation model is the earning forecast.
We have assumed that the earning forecasts by various analysts are good and accurate. This is the biggest risk investors have to face.
In general, investors can use consensus earning forecasts for computing the valuation, however, through experience, investors can identify good analysts from not so good ones, and hence, can be selective in using the earning forecast data.
Bear in mind that a way-off-earning forecast (especially over-bullish) could have disastrous effects on the stock price once the actual result is announced.
A good practice is to compare the forecast EPS growth rate with the averge EPS growth rate in the past three years and see whether the forecast EPS growth rate is in line with the historical numbers.
In short, what investors are looking for is an accurate EPS growth forecast.
We have assumed that the earning forecasts by various analysts are good and accurate. This is the biggest risk investors have to face.
In general, investors can use consensus earning forecasts for computing the valuation, however, through experience, investors can identify good analysts from not so good ones, and hence, can be selective in using the earning forecast data.
Bear in mind that a way-off-earning forecast (especially over-bullish) could have disastrous effects on the stock price once the actual result is announced.
A good practice is to compare the forecast EPS growth rate with the averge EPS growth rate in the past three years and see whether the forecast EPS growth rate is in line with the historical numbers.
In short, what investors are looking for is an accurate EPS growth forecast.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)