Sunday, 9 October 2011

World facing worst financial crisis in history

World facing worst financial crisis in history, Bank of England Governor says


The world is facing the worst financial crisis since at least the 1930s “if not ever”, the Governor of the Bank of England said last night.



World facing worst financial crisis in history, Bank of England Governor says
Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England Photo: PAUL GROVER
Sir Mervyn King was speaking after the decision by the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee to put £75billion of newly created money into the economy in a desperate effort to stave off a new credit crisis and a UK recession.
Economists said the Bank’s decision to resume its quantitative easing [QE], or asset purchase programme, showed it was increasingly fearful for the economy, and predicted more such moves ahead.
Sir Mervyn said the Bank had been driven by growing signs of a global economic disaster.
“This is the most serious financial crisis we’ve seen, at least since the 1930s, if not ever. We’re having to deal with very unusual circumstances, but to act calmly to this and to do the right thing.”
Announcing its decision, the Bank said that the eurozone debt crisis was creating “severe strains in bank funding markets and financial markets”.
The Monetary Policy Committee [MPC] also said that the inflation-driven “squeeze on households’ real incomes” and the Government’s programme of spending cuts will “continue to weigh on domestic spending” for some time to come.
The “deterioration in the outlook” meant more QE was justified, the Bank said.
Financial experts said the committee’s actions would be a “Titanic” disaster for pensioners, savers and workers approaching retirement. Sir Mervyn suggested that was a price worth paying to save the economy from recession.
Under QE, the Bank electronically creates new money which it then uses to buy assets such as government bonds, or gilts, from banks. In theory, the banks then use the cash they gain to increase their lending to businesses and individuals.
By increasing the demand for gilts, QE pushes down the interest rate yields paid to holders of these and other bonds. Critics of the policy say it pushes up inflation and drives down sterling.
The National Association of Pension Funds yesterday called for urgent talks with ministers to address the negative impact of lower gilt yields on pension funds. Joanne Segars, its chief executive, said QE makes it more expensive for employers to provide pensions and will weaken the funding of schemes as their deficits increase. “All this will put additional pressure on employers at a time when they are facing a bleak economic situation,” she said.
Ros Altman, of Saga, said the latest round of QE was “a Titanic disaster” that would increase pensioner poverty. As well as fuelling inflation, she said, falling bond yields would make annuities more expensive, “giving new retirees much less pension income for their money and leaving them permanently poorer in retirement”.
The MPC also voted to keep the Bank Rate at its historic low of 0.5 per cent, another decision that hurts savers. Yesterday, protesters outside the Bank’s headquarters smashed a giant piggy bank to symbolise the situation of pensioners and others forced to raid savings to keep up with the rising cost of living.
Asked about the plight of savers, Sir Mervyn said it was more important to support the wider economy than to support them. He suggested that savers would not be helped by deliberately pushing the British economy into recession. Yesterday’s decision was the first move on QE since 2009, during the global credit crisis, when the Bank injected £200 billion into the economy.
Some analysts believe that this round of QE could be less effective than the previous one, forcing the Bank to create even more money this time.
Michael Saunders of Citigroup, forecast that there could be as much as £225 billion more QE by next year. “I think they will do lots more QE,” he said. “It’s both that the economy is weak but also that the MPC’s view is that QE is not a very powerful tool, or rather it takes a large amount of QE to have much effect on the economy.”
The Bank is supposed to keep inflation near a target of 2 per cent. Inflation now stands at 4.5 per cent, and the Bank admitted it is likely to hit 5 per cent as soon as this month. The Bank’s own research shows that as well as stimulating the economy, QE pushes up prices.
Sir Mervyn insisted that yesterday’s move was still consistent with the 2 per cent inflation target, saying that the slowing economy means inflation could actually fall below that mark “by the end of next year or in 2013”.
The Governor insisted that the MPC’s decisions had been the correct response to events. “The world economy has slowed, America has slowed, China has slowed, and of course particularly the European economy has slowed,” he said. “The world has changed and so has the right policy response.”
City traders took heart from the Bank’s move to boost growth, with the FTSE 100 rising 3.7 per cent to 5,29, its biggest two-day gain since 2008.
The Bank’s decision came after mounting political pressure from ministers worried that Sir Mervyn was not reacting urgently enough to the darkening global economic outlook.
George Osborne, the Chancellor, welcomed the Bank’s move, saying: “The evidence shows that it [QE] will help keep interest rates down and boost demand and that will be a help for British families.”

Oprah Winfrey's 2008 Stanford Commencement Address




Oprah talks about:

Feeling
Failure
Finding happiness

Saturday, 8 October 2011

The great financial crisis facing US and Europe will be with us for a long time

Dr M warns of long financial crisis

By Shannon Teoh October 08, 2011

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 8 — Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad warned the ongoing global economic crisis will continue long into the future as the West continues spending in a “state of denial.”

The former prime minister said in his blog yesterday that Western countries continue “believing that they can somehow continue to remain rich. They are unable to behave like poor people.”

On the same day Datuk Seri Najib Razak tabled a budget that aims to rein in the deficit to 4.7 per cent, Dr Mahathir (picture) said the West “will not recover because they are still in a state of denial.

“They still believe they are rich, as rich as before they plunged into the crisis. They must keep up the big power wealthy country image even if their people have no jobs, riot and protest.

“The great financial crisis will be with us for a long time. Even when it is resolved the aftermath will see slow recovery for the giants of the West,” he wrote.

“How nice it would be if our pocket is picked, we are allowed to print some money to replace what is lost,” he said, mocking the United States’ quantitative easing measures which has seen its federal reserve print US$3 trillion (RM9.5 billion) since the start of the financial crisis in 2008.

“Now Britain is following in the footsteps of elder brother,” he added, referring to the United Kingdom’s recent move to print £75 billion (RM370 billion) to help distressed banks.

The debt crises in Europe and the US have caused the global economy to wobble in recent months and is likely to stunt Malaysia’s export-driven economy in the near future.

Analysts said yesterday that Najib’s prediction of a 5 to 6 per cent growth for 2012 is “too high” which may in turn see Putrajaya fail to meet its deficit forecast.

The prime minister tabled a budget yesterday which saw cash handouts, more money for civil servants, schools and a fund for “high-impact development” projects to put cash in the pockets of voters ahead of a general election expected soon.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/dr-m-warns-of-long-financial-crisis/

Friday, 7 October 2011

Steve Jobs' 2005 Stanford Commencement Address




On facing death and dying

No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.

Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.

Steve Jobs 1955-2011

"The Collapse Is Coming...And Goldman Rules The World"

BBC Speechless As Trader Tells Truth: "The Collapse Is Coming...And Goldman Rules The World"

Malaysian Budget 2012


Market Volatility: Know your psychological biases


The more you know about your psychological biases, the better you can function in the volatile stock market.

Everyone has opinions and psychological biases.  However, people may not know their own biases. 

The more you know about your psychological biases, the better you can function in the volatile stock market.

The entire market may be influenced by psychological reasons, not by fundamental reasons alone. 

From an investment perspective, the bottom line is that the market will continue to fluctuate and give you solid opportunities every so often.
Value in the long run is determined by fundamentals, while short-term gyrations reflect market participants' psychological weaknesses, such as herding.  

Knowledge is the best antidote to making wrong decisions.

If you are a long-term investor, the rational thing to do is to make decisions based on long-term fundamentals of the business.

Europe bids to prop up banks

Europe bids to prop up banks


AFP
2011-10-07

The European Central Bank has announced new measures to provide cash-strapped banks with liquidity as US President Barack Obama stressed Europe must act quickly on its ongoing debt crisis.

Markets cheered the news the ECB would beef up "non-standard" action to help out lenders as the European Commission called for "co-ordinated action" to recapitalise banks and Germany said it should be done without delay.

European equity markets were up more than three per cent as hopes grew that political leaders were finally getting to grips with the crisis.

While ECB chief Jean-Claude Trichet stopped short of cutting rates at the last meeting of his eight-year term, he said the bank would continue to assist lenders although he also urged them to bolster their balance sheets.

The ECB "urges banks to do all that is necessary to reinforce balance sheets (and governments) ... need to take decisive and front-loaded action to bolster public confidence in the sustainability of government finances", said Trichet.

The Bank of England also took bold steps to reinvigorate the sluggish British economy, reinstituting its quantitative easing (QE) policy - whereby it pumps cash directly into the system to boost activity.

The BoE voted in favour of increasing its QE policy by STG75 billion ($A120 billion) to STG275 billion over a four-month period while keeping its main interest rate at a record-low 0.50 per cent.

Earlier, European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso said: "We are now proposing to the member states to have a co-ordinated action to recapitalise banks and get rid of toxic assets they may have."

Speaking to Euronews TV, Barroso urged action to clear up what he termed a "real mess" in the eurozone.

While Europeans scrambled to reassure investors that the continent's banks were safe, Obama reiterated his warning that a failure to tackle the crisis in Europe would quickly spread.

"Our economy really needs a jolt right now. The problems Europe is having today could have a very real effect on our economy at a time when it's already fragile," Obama told a White House news conference.

Europeans "have got to act fast", he said.

"We have got a G20 meeting coming up in November. My strong hope is that by the time of that G20 meeting, that they have a very clear concrete plan of action that is sufficient to the task."

In Berlin, Chancellor Angela Merkel insisted banks should be recapitalised without delay, if needed.

"I think there would be a very clear need (to recapitalise) because this is money that is safely invested ... I don't think we should hesitate," Merkel said.

There would be "far greater damage" if banks needed to be rescued by governments, she said. "But the first step is for banks to recapitalise themselves."

As if to emphasise the urgency of the task facing Europe, the NYSE Euronext stock exchange suspended trading in the shares of the under-fire Franco-Belgian bank, Dexia, at the request of the Belgian market regulator as the French and Belgian governments put together a rescue package for the lender.

The European Banking Authority is readying an audit of the strength of the continent's main banks, assuming they would have to take large losses from their holdings of bonds issued by weak eurozone member states, especially Greece.

Speculation is growing that private investors will have to write off more of Greece's debt than previously thought, perhaps as much as 50 per cent.

But in some positive news for Greece, eurozone chief Jean-Claude Juncker said that an international group of auditors assessing the state of Greek reforms would likely give the green light for its next slice of aid.

"The troika (the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Union) will probably present the report on October 24," said Juncker, who heads the group of eurozone finance ministers.

"I think the troika will make a positive decision," he added.

Greece says it needs the next tranche of aid, worth some eight billion euros, to pay its bills, but eurozone finance ministers delayed action on the bailout at a meeting Monday in Luxembourg.

Richard Carter

Bank of England pumps up economy

Bank of England pumps up economy


The Bank of England has taken fresh emergency stimulus measures, planning to inject STG75 billion ($A120 billion) into a British economy caught up in possibly "the most serious financial crisis" ever.

After a two-day policy meeting, the BoE approved increasing its quantitative easing (QE) by STG75 billion to STG275 billion over a four-month period, sooner than had been expected by many analysts.

The Bank of England's nine-member Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) also decided to keep the main interest rate at a record-low 0.50 per cent, it said.

"This is the most serious financial crisis we've seen at least since the 1930s, if not ever," BoE governor Mervyn King told Sky News television following the policy announcements on Thursday.

"We're having to deal with very unusual circumstances and to act calmly and do the right thing. The right thing at present is to create some more money to inject into the economy."

Under QE, the bank creates new cash which is used to purchase assets such as government and corporate bonds in a bid to encourage lending and in turn boost economic activity.

The BoE injected STG200 billion into the economy between March 2009 and January 2010 but the economy has struggled and over the past nine months has virtually come to a halt.

The pound on Thursday hit a 14-month low at $US1.5272 as investors envisaged no hike to British interest rates for a very long time. The London stock market closed up 3.71 per cent, helped by EU moves to sort out the eurozone debt crisis, traders said.

Finance Minister George Osborne authorised the resumption of the emergency policy in an official letter to Bank of England governor Mervyn King.

The policy announcements came one day after official data showed the British economy had flatlined over the past nine months and that the 2008-09 recession was worse than previously thought, with a peak-to-trough contraction of 7.1 per cent, rather than the previous estimate of 6.4 per cent.

The European Central Bank meanwhile held its key interest rate at 1.5 per cent, shrugging off speculation it could cut borrowing costs to help combat the region's sovereign debt crisis.

The BoE warned that Britain's recovery was endangered by a flat world economy and the eurozone crisis that has so far resulted in EU-IMF bailouts for Greece, Ireland and Portugal.

"Vulnerabilities associated with the indebtedness of some euro-area sovereigns and banks have resulted in severe strains in bank funding markets and financial markets more generally. These tensions in the world economy threaten the UK recovery," the central bank said.

The BoE's key interest rate has stood at 0.50 per cent since March 2009, when it decided to begin pumping new cash into the economy under QE.

Experts claim that while QE can help to kick-start an economy, it also threatens to fuel inflation, which in the long run can actually hinder growth.

With British annual inflation currently at 4.5 per cent - far above the BoE's two per cent target - the bank faces a tricky balancing act.

The economy grew by just 0.1 per cent in the three months to June.

Britain hauled itself out of a deep recession in the third quarter of 2009, but its recovery has also been severely constrained by the impact of collapsing consumer confidence and painful state austerity cuts.

Roland Jackson

Thursday, 6 October 2011

With inflation approaching 5pc in UK, do we really want more QE?


The Bank has announced 75 billion more QE (Photo: PA)
On the basis that inflation is better than depression, I suppose it is just about possible to go along with the Monetary Policy Committee's decision to increase "quantitative easing" by a further £75bn.
But I worry about it. I worry both that it will be ineffective in terms of stimulating investment and growth, I worry that it is going to be very difficult for the Bank of England to unwind these now vast holdings of government debt, I worry that we are now perilously close to outright monetisation of the deficit (a policy approach which all economic history shows ends in abject disaster), and I worry that ultimately, it's bound to be inflationary.
In a speech two or three weeks back, Adam Posen, until recently an outrider on the MPC in demanding more QE, said that such fears were "unfounded" and "unwarranted", but answer me this. How's the further plunge in the value of the pound that greeted this announcement not inflationary? Even the Bank of England's own analysis of the effect of QE to date, which is based on quite questionable methodology, estimates that it has added 0.75 to 1.5 percentage points to CPI inflation for a maximum gain in real GDP of 2pc. That doesn't seem to me to be a particularly good trade off.
And you cannot help but think that the long term impact of all this money printing is almost bound to be highly inflationary. Already, the Bank of England has bought up around 20pc of the national debt, equal to some 14pc of GDP. This will expand it to close to 30pc.
Since a fair old chunk of this debt is in the form of inflation protected gilts, which have not been part of the asset purchase programme, the proportion of the conventional gilts market that will be sitting on the Bank of England's balance sheet by the end of the latest batch of purchases is going to be rather more than a half. When something looks mad, it generally is. Yields on ten year gilts are already at historic lows at less than 3pc. Is it really sensible to be driving them even lower?
In his speech, Mr Posen said "we will know that monetary policy has done enough for long enough when long term interest rates rise due to demand for capital from our private sector taking on risk and making investments". But why would they rise when there's the open cheque book of the Bank of England willing to buy up almost anything that comes onto the market? And if they do rise, it's much more likely to be because investors expect inflation than than a sudden return to rampant business investment.
Despite these concerns, I guess it's just about possible to support what the Bank of England is doing given the extreme downside risks to the economy that have swept in from the Continent over the last month or so. With all this talk of coordinated action, we have to assume that other central banks are poised to follow suit, though I'll believe it when I see it as far as the European Central Bank is concerned. Jean-Claude Trichet is holding his monthly press conference shortly, so there may be more to say on this later.
But it's a disappointment that the Bank's statement made no mention of the "credit easing" flagged by George Osborne, the Chancellor, in his conference speech. This is an idea worth pursuing – a way of getting the newly released funds to the bits of the economy that really need it and stimulating some much needed business investment.
As it is, I fear that it will again be the investment bankers who are the major beneficiaries. QE is like a drug; once hooked, it's very difficult to wean yourself off. Just how many fixes are required before you realise you are an addict?
What's more, as every addict knows, to get the same effect, you have to keep increasing and repeating the dose. The way things are going, the entire gilts market will end up in the hands of the Bank of England. I'm sorry, but I fail to see the difference between such an extreme position and outright monetisation of the deficit, the sort of thing they got up to in Weimar Germany. In that case, the end result was not just the destruction of middle class savings, but the currency itself.
UPDATE: ECB has announced more liquidity for the banking sector, but there's no QE even remotely to compare with what the Bank of England is doing. Now there's a surprise. Apparently, the pros and cons of cutting rates were discussed, but by "consensus", the ECB council decided to leave them unchanged. Again, no surprise there.

Why the iPad will take over the world


Why the iPad will take over the world

The Apple iPad is the ultimate browsing machine (Photo: REUTERS)
The Apple iPad is the ultimate browsing machine (Photo: REUTERS)
Apple is on the verge of releasing the latest iteration in its operating system for the iPhone and iPad. Sometime in the coming months, it is also likely to bring out a newly beefed up version of the iPad. These may not seem like particularly momentous moments to anyone but the more die-hard Apple evangelists, but for me they have underlined the fact that this little tablet is heading for domination of the mobile computing industry.
Before you dismiss this as hype, I should emphasise that this conclusion has come only after some months of reflection, consideration and intense usage of an iPad, and comparison with its competitors. I was one of those fools who bought an iPad right at the beginning, when they were just out in the US and were yet to touch down in Britain. I picked it up in Washington, where I was attending the IMF's summit, more out of hope and curiosity than an expectation that it would change my life. And the truth is I was initially rather disappointed.
I bought it wondering whether it would be the tool that meant I could throw away my laptop. And so I tried, over the following days, to use it as a journalistic tool – I tried to write articles on it (using the bluetooth keyboard – typing on the screen isn't bad, but it isn't brilliant), take notes with it, use it to read the IMF reports and send emails back home. It was an unmitigated disaster. I lost some of my most important notes because one of the applications kept crashing (this is not good news when you're a journalist – and fellow hacks are, understandably, reluctant to share notes at the best of times); cutting and pasting text (quite important when you routinely have to edit and re-edit your articles) was fiddly; there wasn't a word count in Pages, the main word processing application; you couldn't switch between different applications (multi-tasking); you couldn't search with PDF files (disastrous if you are trying to navigate a 300 page report on banking regulation), etc etc.
I never wrote this at the time (far too much going on with elections, expenses and whatnot), but my abiding feeling was that I had bought the iPad hoping to dispel all those people who said they couldn't see the point of it – and I had come out agreeing with them. What was the point of this device? Not good enough to double as a laptop, not small enough to fit in your pocket, not easy-on-the-eye to read for long periods in the same way as a Kindle. Jack of all trades and master of none – or so I thought.
What I hadn't realised was that this is pretty much the point. The iPad is a disruptive innovation. Disruption, for those of you who, like me until recently, aren't familiar with business theory, is one of the ways companies upend their bigger and older competitors in business these days. The gist is as follows: when a business comes along with an innovative product that challenges an existing one, it is often cheaper, of lower quality and is often deemed "not good enough" by potential customers.
Think of mp3s – their sound quality is far inferior to CDs, but customers realised pretty soon that they were both cheaper, more convenient and of a just about satisfactory quality. When personal computers first arrived, those who built powerful mainframe room-sized computers dismissed them as incapable – and indeed they were often so slow that they couldn't keep up with the people typing into them. But the point behind disruption is that in due course the quality of the product gets to a standard that is acceptable to consumers (and if not better than the incumbent product, it is at least cheaper). Right now, flash memory is disrupting hard disks. And so on.
The graph below tells the story: sustaining technologies, such as hard disks, or dedicated digital cameras, improve over time, but eventually reach a standard beyond what most consumers, and perhaps even high end users are after. Into the market comes the disrupting technology, for instance flash memory or cameraphones, whose qualities (be they size or picture quality) are initially well below the standards of the sustaining technology but are compensated by their cheaper price or added convenience. Sometimes a whole new range of customers enters the market at this lower price/quality point. Eventually the quality of the disrupting product can surpass the old sustaining one.
susdir2
The iPad is disruptive to notebook computers: in its first iterations it doesn't meet the exacting standards that many computer users have, so it is not an obvious replacement. It wasn't good enough for me as a journalist; or indeed for anyone who wants to use their laptop for photo manipulation, DJing, game playing and so on. But it is good enough for many others.
It is good enough for students, for instance. Since returning to college, I have found myself using the iPad more and more. It is smaller than the laptop, I can use it to read as well as take notes and write. It still isn't brilliant for article editing, but it more or less does the job (and given I don't have to pump out articles at the rate I did as a professional journalist, so be it). I produced this blog (and indeed have written almost all of my recent blogs, papers, essays and all the stuff one needs to produce at college) on it. A couple of weeks ago my laptop spontaneously combusted. It didn't matter, because by then I hadn't been using it for some months anyway.
The imminent update to the iOS takes the iPad one step forward. In comes multitasking, in comes midi support and a host of other upgrades that, gradually, remove more demanding customers' resistance to shifting down the iPad. Then along will come the next iteration, with higher resolution and more power, making it less attractive, in comparison, to own a laptop, and so on and so on.
It isn't just the iPad that's doing the disruption; it looks increasingly as if Apple's existing operating system, Mac OS, will soon be disrupted by its mobile OS, which has been inserted as a kind of trojan horse into the next update of Mac OS.
This is classic disruption, as laid out by Clay Christensen in The Innovator's Dilemma. The interesting thing in this case is that usually the company that does the disrupting is quite independent from the one that gets disrupted. In this case, Apple is disrupting itself, which is quite an achievement for a giant company. The only question is whether they can keep it up.

Icapital.biz Portfolio as of 15 September 2011


Below are the latest holdings of Icapital.biz as of 15 September 2011, as published in Investor Day booklet as compared to earlier portfolio as of 22 June 2011.

Steve Jobs: key quotes

Steve Jobs, Apple co-founder and former CEO, dies at the age of 56

Candles, flowers, and an iPhone with Steve Jobs photo displayed outside the Apple Store at West 66th Street in New York
Steve Jobs, the Apple co-founder and former CEO, has died at the age of 56
after a long and highly public battle with cancer. "Apple has lost a visionary and
creative genius and the world has lost an amazing human being," Apple said.
"Steve's brilliance, passion and energy were the source of countless innovations
that enrich and improve all of our lives."





Here are some key quotes from Steve Jobs, the legendary 
co-founder and former chief executive of Apple Inc, 
who has died aged 56 after a long battle with cancer.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs holds a new iPod shuffle MP3 player at the 2005 Macworld Expo January 11, 2005
Apple CEO Steve Jobs holds a new iPod shuffle MP3 player at the 2005 Macworld Expo January 11, 2005 Photo: Getty Images


"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything - all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure - these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.''
"Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma - which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice.''
"Stay hungry, stay foolish."
Commencement speech at Stanford University, 2005
"Innovation comes from people meeting up in the hallways or calling each other at 10:30 at night with a new idea, or because they realized something that shoots holes in how we've been thinking about a problem. It's ad hoc meetings of six people called by someone who thinks he has figured out the coolest new thing ever and who wants to know what other people think of his idea.''
"And it comes from saying no to 1,000 things to make sure we don't get on the wrong track or try to do too much. We're always thinking about new markets we could enter, but it's only by saying no that you can concentrate on the things that are really important.''
Interview with Business Week, 2004
"In most people's vocabularies, design means veneer. It's interior decorating. It's the fabric of the curtains and the sofa. But to me, nothing could be further from the meaning of design. Design is the fundamental soul of a man-made creation that ends up expressing itself in successive outer layers of the product or service.''
"My position coming back to Apple was that our industry was in a coma. It reminded me of Detroit in the '70s, when American cars were boats on wheels.''
Interview with Fortune Magazine, 2000
"These technologies can make life easier, can let us touch people we might not otherwise. You may have a child with a birth defect and be able to get in touch with other parents and support groups, get medical information, the latest experimental drugs. These things can profoundly influence life. I'm not downplaying that. But it's a disservice to constantly put things in this radical new light - that it's going to change everything. Things don't have to change the world to be important.''
Interview with Wired, 1996
"I don't think I've ever worked so hard on something, but working on Macintosh was the neatest experience of my life. Almost everyone who worked on it will say that. None of us wanted to release it at the end. It was as though we knew that once it was out of our hands, it wouldn't be ours anymore. When we finally presented it at the shareholders' meeting, everyone in the auditorium stood up and gave it a 5-minute ovation. What was incredible to me was that I could see the Mac team in the first few rows. It was as though none of us could believe that we'd actually finished it. Everyone started crying.''
Interview with Playboy, 1985
"You think I'm an arrogant [expletive] who thinks he's above the law, and I think you're a slime bucket who gets most of his facts wrong.''
Answering a New York Times reporter who asked about his health, 2008
"We don't get a chance to do that many things, and everyone should be really excellent. Because this is our life."
Interview with Fortune, 2008
"Design is not just what it looks like. Design is how it works."
Interview with The New York Times, 2003
"Being the richest man in the cemetery doesn't matter to me. Going to bed at night saying we've done something wonderful, that's what matters to me."
Interview with The Wall Street Journal, 1993
"You can't just ask the cutomers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new."
Interview with INC magazine, 1989