Tuesday 25 October 2011

Tips on how to invest during turbulent times


Tuesday October 25, 2011


Singular Vision - By Teoh Kok Lin


STOCK markets around the world lately gave investors that sinking feeling again, weighed down by deepening woes of Europe's sovereign debts, an anemic US economy and new fears of a sharp economic slowdown in China.
Many investors sold shares to hold more cash, despite cash earning very little interest. In Singapore for example, six months USD fixed deposits of less than US$1mil earns zero interest in some banks.
In the United States, 10-year Treasury bonds are yielding 2.1% per annum; despite misery returns, many investors prefer the safety of US Treasuries during crisis times, while waiting for policymakers to act boldly and markets to stabilise.
At the same time, we see many economists and other pundits offer a whole host of predictions about today's global financial predicaments. The many predictions range from the slightly hopeful to the pessimistic, right down to the disastrous and absurd.
Does it sound familiar? Did we not hear many such predictions during the 2008/2009 global financial crisis? Who should we listen to? What should one do?
No doubt in hindsight, a few forecasts will be correct; and as the dust settles, many extreme predictions will also likely be forgotten. Yet for investors today, separating much of the “noise” from facts is one of the more tricky parts of steering through these very challenging times.
Fundamentals and valuation takes a back seat during a crisis
Volatile stock markets today are driven by latest positive or negative news flow affecting sentiment. Uncertainties during a crisis causes investment risks to spike, stock investors tend to sell first and ask questions later; fundamentals and stock valuation typically takes a back seat in the short term.
No doubt many investors worry about negative impact to a company's fundamentals in difficult times. For example, a manufacturing company's stock with a present price earning (PE) multiple of six times can change drastically to 60 times PE if earnings were to collapse 90% because of a global financial crisis.
Similarly, a property company's price to book value discount of 60% can easily drop to 30% if asset value is marked down by half in troubled times. Monitoring, reassessments and analysis of a company's financial progress is obviously important during tumultuous times.
Share prices of companies (even those with good fundamentals) may continue to fall indiscriminately, due to many reasons such as panic selling, fund redemption and repatriation. Investors should tread cautiously, even if stock prices may appear to be at very attractive levels.
I relate a challenging experience from the last global stock market plunge. In 2008, I invested in the largest luxury watch distributor and retailer in China (at that time 210 stores and sales amounting to 5.5 billion yuan a year or about 30% market share).
This Hong Kong listed Chinese company sells luxury watches (such as Omega, Longines, Bvlgari) from global brand owners Swatch group of Switzerland and LVMH of France (both by the way are also 9.1% and 6.3% shareholders of this Chinese company respectively).
As the US sub-prime mortgage crisis deepens by end-July 2008, many stocks around the world plunged. This company's shares similarly dropped from HK$2 to HK$1.50 in a matter of weeks.
We vigorously reassessed the company's fundamentals, including visits to retail outlets in China and Hong Kong. The result was an affirmation of our conviction to invest in the company for the long-term, despite short-term price weakness.
By late September 2008, we decided to purchase more shares when valuation proved so attractive at HK$1.15 per share (at a PE multiple of eight times).
Unfortunately, as the global financial crisis worsened, the company's shares continued to plunge and bottomed to a low of HK$0.51 by Nov 26, 2008.
This stock eventually recovered back to HK$2 per share (by June 1, 2009) and went on to exceed HK$5 per share by late 2010. The company's share prices recovered partly because Asian equities rebounded quickly in 2009, but also reached new highs because the company's fundamentals continue to improve with strong sales (+49%), profitability (+26%) and expansions (+140 stores to 350 stores) from 2008 to 2010.
A lesson if you will that during a crisis, one should be prepared for short-term (weeks and months) stock market volatility.
It is essential for bargain hunters to have long-term holding power, good understanding of company fundamentals and strong conviction on a company's prospect. In the long-term, we know fundamentals and valuation does matter.
How does one invest during a time of crisis?
My approaches to investing in turbulent times are:
Search for and invest (when valuations are attractive) in well managed companies that will not only survive but emerge stronger from crisis times;
Be prepared to stomach stock market volatility in the months ahead;
Have a longer term investment horizon (perhaps two to three years); once this crisis dissipates, reap the rewards as stock markets recover.
In Asia, macroeconomic fundamentals likely will remain resilient as many Asian economies have strong foreign currency reserves, coupled with more fiscal and monetary policy options to support growth.
China is also likely to withstand any fallout from Europe better than most would think. China's economy is still growing at a strong 9.1% gross domestic product growth for the third quarter of 2011; speculations about China's economy crashing may be somewhat premature at this stage.
Similarly, I think many established Asian companies have sufficient resources be it cash, borrowing powers or human capital, to emerge out of these turbulent times faster and stronger than before.
I believe with increasingly attractive valuation, the investing risk-reward equation (potential downside risk versus long term return prospects) favors Asian equities in the long run. I have confidence investing in Asia's fundamentals and Asian companies for many more years ahead.

  • Teoh Kok Lin is the founder and chief investment officer of Singular Asset Management Sdn Bhd

  • Twice as many millionaires in Malaysia over last 18 months


    Tuesday October 25, 2011

    PETALING JAYA: The number of millionaires has almost doubled in Malaysia over the last 18 months, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported.
    Citing a report released this week by international financial firm Credit Suisse GroupWSJ wrote that since early 2010, Malaysia added 19,000 new millionaires, bringing its total to 39,000.
    Comparatively, the number in Indonesia increased by 52,000 to 112,000, while the number of Singaporeans worth over US$1mil (RM3.15mil) is 183,000, triple what it was a year ago.
    The growth spurt of the nouveau riche has been attributed to the weakening US dollar and stingy pockets.
    Compared with the Credit Suisse numbers from early last year, these three countries alone have produced close to 190,000 new millionaires since the beginning of 2010.
    However, this figure still fell short of the 212,000 new millionaires in China.
    “Much of the rise is just a reflection of the weakening dollar, which makes the Singapore dollar- and rupiah-denominated riches look more impressive when translated into US dollars,” WSJ reported.
    “Otherwise, it can be attributed to growing savings, stock and property prices.”
    Credit Suisse defines wealth as a person's financial and real estate assets minus their debt.
    (Networth = Financial Asset + Real Estate Asset - Debt)
    The report also said that the average Singaporean was wealthier in comparison to the rest of the world, with the average household wealth at US$285,000 (RM897,000).
    This makes them the fifth wealthiest people in the world after Switzerland, Australia, Norway and France.
    Average household wealth in Indonesia, on the other hand, hovered at only around US$12,000 (RM37,771).
    “Strong currencies, rising property prices, climbing commodity prices and healthy stock markets have helped the region but the real secret to Southeast Asia's success may be how stingy money makers are here,”WSJ noted.
    “Average household debt, which offsets much of savings and investments in Western countries, is very low in the region.
    “It is only 13% of total assets in Singapore and 2.5% of total assets in Indonesia.”

    Monday 24 October 2011

    Two out of five Americans with federal student debt can't make monthly payments and either defer, default or are delinquent


    Student Loan Debt Leads to Confusion, Protests and Defaults


    Photograph by Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images

    Source: Photograph by Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images
    William Prince, of Rosenberg, Texas, knows just how inescapable student loans can be. The 52-year-old father of two started paying off $51,000 in college debt 15 years ago and now owes $57,000. "I don't expect to pay these loans off in my lifetime," he says. Prince, a criminal justice major who works in private security, had to defer payments during three bouts of unemployment, and the accumulated interest left him deeper in debt.
    Americans now owe about $950 billion in student loans —more than their total credit-card debt. The weight of those IOUs is a frequent refrain for Occupy Wall Street protestors and their online supporters. On the "We Are the 99 Percent" Tumblr blog, which features hundreds of pictures of people holding handwritten signs describing their desperate financial situations, student loan concerns exceed those about children, unemployment, and health care, according to an analysis by Mike Konczal, a fellow with the nonprofit Roosevelt Institute.
    Desperation may have something to do with that outcry. Two out of five Americans with federal student debt can't make monthly payments and either defer, default or are delinquent, according to Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of Fastweb.com, a free scholarship-matching service, and FinAid.org, a source of student financial aid information. Although the laws are gradually changing, student debtors' odds are still grim. The best means they have of one day growing free of those debts is to know the system.

    Eroded Borrowers' Rights

    There are very few ways to reduce or renegotiate education debt; unlike credit-card debt, few can do this via bankruptcy. "There has been a steady erosion in rights for student loan borrowers," says Deanne Loonin, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center. Activists and some congressional Democrats argue that Congress should again allow borrowers to discharge student debts in normal bankruptcy — a right lost in a 2005 law. They also ask for better supervision and limits on debt collection. Such improvements could be years away, if they ever take place.
    For federally backed loans, the situation is better, though still far from perfect. The government can seize wages, tax refunds, earned income tax credits and even Social Security. One of Loonin’s clients, an 84-year-old man, once took out a student loan for a relative; the payments now amount to about 40 percent of his Social Security checks, leaving him with a bit more than $750 each month.
    The federal government is taking steps that could make the debt burden more manageable. A provision in the 2010 health-care reform law pushed private lenders out of the business of issuing federally guaranteed loans. The 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law puts the new Consumer Financial Protection Board in charge of collecting better data and regulating private student lenders. The new agency also is planning to launch an online tool — a "student debt assistant"— to help debtors learn more about their options.

    Income-Based Repayment

    One option introduced in 2009 is income-based repayment. It allows borrowers to repay federal loans as a percentage of the prior year's adjusted gross income, capped at 15 percent. (If a borrower's circumstance changes from the prior year, he or she can request recalculation.) Under so-called IBR, all federal loans are forgiven after 25 years — 10 years for those in nonprofit or public service jobs. A 2010 change in the law means that for borrowing that begins in 2014, payments are capped at 10 percent of income and all debts are forgiven after 20 years.
    Because no payments are required on income below 150 percent of the poverty line, income-based repayment is helpful for such borrowers as 28-year-old Jennifer Sandella. She earns so little that she doesn’t need to pay anything on her $45,000 in graduate school loans. For a single person, 150 percent of the poverty line is $16,335; for a family of three, it's $27,795.
    Two years after the program was introduced, few borrowers know about IBR. Only about 1 percent of federal borrowers —out of the 10 percent who could benefit — are enrolled, Kantrowitz estimates. The U.S. Department of Education has been offering information about IBR on its website, through customer-service representatives, and to students when they exit school. It now plans to contact current borrowers to inform them about the program, says spokeswoman Sara Gast.
    The program has drawbacks. Persons with private loans, such as Prince, aren’t eligible. And any unpaid interest is added to debt until loans are eventually forgiven. "I'm still accruing interest at a phenomenal rate," Sandella says. If she never manages to pay her loans off and her debt is forgiven after the 25-year mark, the amount forgiven will be taxed as income, perhaps triggering a big bill from the IRS.

    Few Options for Private Borrowers

    Those with private loans have little leverage when negotiating with their lenders. Student loans can be forgiven in bankruptcy only if debtors take lenders to court and prove an “undue hardship” — a legal step taken by merely 0.1 percent of eligible debtors. Of those, about half got relief, according to a 2011 analysis by Harvard Law student Jason Iuliano. The Consumer Bankers Association, which represents private lenders, said in a statement: “Banks work with borrowers experiencing financial hardship on private student loans” by, for example, allowing borrowers to temporarily suspend payments.
    The best way to avoid being trapped by debt is to restrain it from the start. Students need to "shop around for schools to limit how much they need to borrow,” says Lauren Asher, president of the Institute for College Access & Success, a nonprofit advocacy organization that runs the Project on Student Debt. Regulators and colleges could do much more to steer young students toward more manageable debt loads, she says. “Inadequate information and aggressive marketing tactics can have an effect on people,” Asher adds, noting that many students take on private loans even though they are eligible for less-risky federal loans. Dependent students can borrow up to $5,500 in federal loans as college freshmen, while their parents can borrow up to the total cost of attendance, minus other aid.
    Colleges are required to provide counseling to student borrowers when they exit school. They "are always looking for ways to do it better," says Terry Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the American Council on Education. But it's not clear how much of that counseling sinks in. Says Hartle: "I'm afraid an awful lot of college students only learn how much they've borrowed when they begin repayment."

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-21/student-loan-debt-leads-to-confusion-protests-and-many-defaults.html

    Steve Jobs abrasive style drove people away, says biographer

    Posted on 24 October 2011 - 11:12am
    APPLE Inc co-founder Steve Jobs revolutionised multiple industries with his cutting-edge products but he was not the world's best manager, biographer Walter Isaacson said.
    Jobs changed the course of personal computing during two stints at Apple and then brought a revolution to the mobile market but the inspiring genius is known for his hard edges that have often times alienated colleagues and early investors with his my-way-or-the-highway dictums.
    "He's not warm and fuzzy," Isaacson said in an interview with 60 Minutes on CBS on Sunday. "He was not the world's greatest manager. In fact, he could have been one of the world's worst managers."
    "He could be very, very mean to people at times," he added.
    Jobs loved to argue but not everyone around him shared that passion, which drove some of his top people away. While his style had yielded breakthrough products, it didn't make for "great management style," Isaacson said.
    In one of the more than 40 interviews that Jobs gave the biographer, the technology icon said he felt totally comfortable being brutally honest.
    "That's the ante for being in the room. So we're brutally honest with each other and all of them can tell me they think I'm full of s**t, and I can tell anyone I think they're full of s**t," Jobs said. "And we've had some rip-roaring arguments where we're yelling at each other."
    Isaacson's biography Steve Jobs, which hits bookstores on Monday, reveals that Jobs refused potentially life-saving cancer surgery for nine months, was bullied in school, tried various quirky diets as a teenager, and exhibited early strange behaviour such as staring at others without blinking.
    The book is expected to paint an unprecedented, no-holds-barred portrait of a man who famously guarded his privacy fiercely but whose death ignited a global outpouring of grief and tribute.
    Isaacson said in the interview that the reality distortion theory that had always been associated with Jobs stemmed from the Apple co-founder's belief that he was special and that the rules didn't apply to him.
    'Magical thinking'
    "He could drive himself by magical thinking," Isaacson said. "By believing something that the rest of us couldn't possibly believe, and sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't."
    Jobs, who has revolutionized the world of personal computers, animated movies, music, phones, tablet, digital publishing and retail stores, would have liked to conquer television as well, Isaacson said.
    "He had a few other visions. He would love to make an easy-to-use television set," said Isaacson, speaking of Job's last two-and-a-half years of life. "But he started focusing on his family again as well. And it was a painful brutal struggle. And he would talk, often to me about the pain."
    Jobs, in his final meeting with Isaacson in mid-August, still held out hope that there might be one new drug that could save him. He also wanted to believe in God and an afterlife.
    "Ever since I've had cancer, I've been thinking about (God) more. And I find myself believing a bit more. Maybe it's because I want to believe in an afterlife. That when you die, it doesn't just all disappear," Isaacson quoted Jobs as saying.
    "Then he paused for a second and he said 'yeah, but sometimes I think it's just like an on-off switch. Click and you're gone," Isaacson said of Jobs. "He paused again, and he said: And that's why I don't like putting on-off switches on Apple devices." – Reuters

    How many hours are you willing to invest to be the best you can?


    The magic number is 10,000

    TEN thousand.
    That, according to research, is the magic number to become world class in whatever field one chooses. Whether it is to become a musician, sports player, programming specialist or top-notch executive.
    Ten thousand hours of graft specialising on the skill of your job. I sat in on an operations meeting last week. The CEO had been having a discussion with one of his staff who wanted to leave the organisation because he could not see a career path. The CEO asked him a few questions — simple questions to "see where he (the employee) was coming from". Much to the dismay of the CEO, the employee revealed that he had only done a couple of installations since he joined this telecommunications company a year ago.
    Needless to say, the operations meeting was not a happy one. One by one, the CEO went round the table and tabulated the number of installations each of the engineers had done in the past year. He found that the two senior engineers pretty much did all the work; the underlings simply watched their superiors whilst the installations were being done. I guessed these underlings also checked their Facebook and Twitter and Linked In instead of improving their skills.
    Armed with knowledge I had acquired over the weekend reading Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell, I revealed the research results Gladwell shares in his book. The secret to success is 10,000 hours of graft. The results of various research studies showed that to be truly world class in anything one does, one needs to invest about just over one year of one's life to become an expert in that field. And we are not talking about academic time. We are talking about time taken on the actual task.
    In Outliers, Gladwell examines the success stories of Bill Gates, Bill Joy (who co-founded Sun Microsystems), The Beatles and others. And what he found common amongst all of them is the number of hours they spent working on their special skill. There were other factors that contributed to their success but without the investment of time, these people would not have made it to the top of their ladder.
    The consequences of this research to companies, manufacturers, installers, service providers and others are very clear. The differentiator is training and focus. If an executive wants his or her business to be the best, they need to develop a culture where the employee is focused on his particular skill and keeps repeating it. It sounds straightforward. But how many companies actually track this.
    Airlines do for their pilots. The medical profession does. The accounting profession does — kind of, although it is mainly for billing purposes. Consulting companies, IT companies and other service providers all also do some form of tracking but it is more for accounting than for training and performance improvement purposes.
    So the challenge to companies wanting to be world class is straightforward.
    How many hours does it take for your employee to be become world class?
    The challenge to individuals is also simple.
    How many hours are you willing to invest to be the best you can?
    During one interview I saw on television, Sir Alex Ferguson recalled how Eric Cantona would continue practising after training had ended. He would practise his volleying, his kicking and various other skills. And this was from an established world-class player.
    The companies that perform the best will spend the most. These companies however will spend wisely. When Jack Welch set about transforming General Electric, he cut headcount significantly. At the same time, he invested in their training centre at Crotonville because he believed that to make GE the best, he had to provide the best training possible. Six Sigma has saved Motorola (which developed this concept) more than US$17 billion in savings since 1986. The doctrine of Six Sigma is to continuously improve processes to reduce defects. To produce these savings, Motorola had to invest in this programme. Short-term pain but recurring long-term benefits.
    When I looked at the success stories of individuals and companies, it all made sense. Successful companies have a differentiator from their competitors. They are able to produce a product more cheaply or at a better quality. They did not get there by accident. They got there because they followed a carefully laid-out plan which sets out to make them the best at what they do. And that involved an investment of time.
    Just like Bill Gates. Just like Bill Joy. Just like The Beatles. The common denominator was 10,000. Hours, that is.
    So, to all CEOs and the training departments of companies which want to be world class... just remember the magic number. Ten thousand.
    Tony Pereira is a chartered accountant and CFO of a private venture fund

    Singapore eases monetary policy, warns of inflation

    Posted on 14 October 2011 - 09:27am
    SINGAPORE (Oct 14, 2011): Singapore's central bank loosened monetary policy slightly on Friday in the face of global economic weakness but not as much as markets had expected, stressing inflation was expected to remain elevated in the near term.
    The decision to allow the Singapore dollar to appreciate at a more modest pace sent the local currency up as much as 0.7% in early trade, and highlighted a policy dilemma for Asian central banks as they face both slowing growth and persistent price pressures.
    "MAS will continue with the policy of a modest and gradual appreciation of the Singapore dollar NEER (nominal effective exchange rate) policy band in the period ahead," the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said in its half-yearly policy statement.
    "However, given the expected moderation in core inflation, the slope of the policy band will be reduced, with no change to the width of the band and the level at which it is centred," MAS added.
    The Singapore dollar traded around 1.2745 against the US dollar, up from 1.2770 just before the announcement and 1.285 earlier in the Asian day.
    "MAS slightly surprised with a less bearish stance. The market expected more easing," said Goh Puay Yeong, Asia FX strategist at Credit Suisse in Singapore.
    Singapore manages monetary policy by letting the local dollar rise or fall against a secret basket of currencies of its main trading partners to boost growth or control imported inflation. Its currency is the world's 12th most actively traded.
    Growth trends in the highly open economy and its monetary settings are a bellwether not just for demand from developed markets but may also give hints on policy in China, whose managed float of the yuan is believed to be modelled on the Singapore dollar.
    Chua Hak Bin, an economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said the MAS statement suggested headline inflation will remain high at 5 percent or above in coming months.
    "That is probably the reason why the MAS is probably a bit more constrained in easing to a neutral bias," he said.
    MAS said in its policy statement that "headline inflation will be elevated for the rest of this year before easing, especially in the second half of 2012".
    Singapore also reported on Friday that its economy grew 1.3% in the third quarter on a seasonally adjusted and annualised rate, beating forecasts for an expansion of 0.8%.
    This meant the city-state narrowly avoided a recession as its economy had contracted a revised 6.3% in the second quarter.
    However, third quarter growth was due primarily to a surge in biomedical production that more than offset the continued decline in electronics. On a sequential basis, Singapore's services industries contracted 0.7%.
    Output from the biomedical sector can be highly volatile.
    Singapore's decision to loosen policy follows numerous economists' downgrades of global growth forecasts for this year and 2012, and Indonesia's surprise decision earlier this week to cut interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point.
    All 13 economists polled by Reuters before the policy statement had predicted Singapore would loosen policy in some way as global demand cools, although only one expected MAS to switch to a neutral currency bias.
    Singapore slightly tightened policy in April by sanctioning an immediate rise in the value of its dollar, saying headline inflation will likely stay elevated. – Reuters