Great, good and gruesome businesses of Warren Buffett (Capital Allocation and Savings Accounts) Buffett compares his three different types of great, good and gruesome businesses to "savings accounts." The great business is like an account that pays an extraordinarily high interest rate that will rise as the years pass. A good one pays an attractive rate of interest that will be earned also on deposits that are added. The gruesome account both pays an inadequate interest rate and requires you to keep adding money at those disappointing returns.
Here is a detailed elaboration and summary of Warren Buffett's analogy comparing businesses to different types of savings accounts.
Core Analogy: Businesses as Savings Accounts
Warren Buffett simplifies complex business analysis by comparing a company to a savings account. In this analogy:
The Business Itself is the savings account.
The Capital You Invest is the principal deposit.
The Company's Profits (Return on Capital) is the interest rate the account pays.
The key to brilliant capital allocation is to "deposit" your money (invest) into the type of "account" (business) that will generate the highest and most sustainable "interest" (profits) over time.
Elaboration of the Three Account Types
1. The "Great" Business: The Supercharged Savings Account
Analogy: An account that "pays an extraordinarily high interest rate that will rise as the years pass."
Elaboration: This is the ideal investment. You make an initial deposit, and it not only pays a high yield from the start, but that yield also increases over time without you needing to add more money.
Business Characteristics:
Durable Moat: It has a strong competitive advantage (brand, patents, network effect) that protects it from competitors and allows it to raise prices (high pricing power).
Capital Efficiency: It generates massive cash flows from its existing operations (low capital intensity). It "earns significantly more than it consumes."
Self-Sustaining Growth: The business can fund its own growth and increase its profits (the "interest rate") using its internal cash flow. Your return on the initial capital automatically compounds and grows.
Example: Think of See's Candies. Buffett bought it in 1972. It required little additional investment but consistently generated more and more cash for Buffett to reinvest elsewhere.
2. The "Good" Business: The Solid, But Thirsty Savings Account
Analogy: An account that "pays an attractive rate of interest that will be earned also on deposits that are added."
Elaboration: This account pays a good, steady interest rate. However, to keep the total interest income growing, you must constantly add more of your own money to the principal. The rate itself doesn't go up.
Business Characteristics:
Moderate Moat: It operates in a competitive industry where maintaining advantage requires continuous reinvestment.
Capital Hungry: It has moderate to high capital intensity. To grow earnings, the business must reinvest most of its profits (or raise new capital) back into new plants, equipment, or R&D.
Management Dependent: Success heavily relies on smart management ("good jockeys") to wisely allocate that new capital.
Example: Many well-run manufacturing or industrial companies fall here. They are profitable, but to expand and maintain their position, they frequently need to build new factories or upgrade technology.
3. The "Gruesome" Business: The Financial Black Hole
Analogy: An account that "both pays an inadequate interest rate and requires you to keep adding money at those disappointing returns."
Elaboration: This is the worst type of investment. The account pays a meager interest rate, yet it constantly demands you pour more money into it just to keep it from collapsing. You are throwing good money after bad.
Business Characteristics:
No Moat: It operates in a highly competitive industry with no barriers to entry (e.g., airlines or steel in Buffett's era). Pricing power is absent.
Capital Destructive: It has very high capital intensity and "burns significantly more cash than it consumes." The return on capital is low and falling.
Value Trap: It may show high earnings growth, but this is a trap because it's funded by endless new capital at poor returns. As the table states, "Good jockeys won’t do well on broken-down nags"—even brilliant management can't save a terrible business model.
Summary and Key Takeaway
Buffett's analogy powerfully illustrates his most crucial investment rule: The primary goal is not to find a good stock, but to own a great business.
Seek the "Great": Your primary mission is to find and buy (at a sensible price) those rare, "supercharged savings account" businesses. These are the compounders that build long-term wealth effortlessly.
Be Selective with the "Good": "Good" businesses can be good investments if bought cheaply, but they require more work and constant monitoring of capital allocation.
Avoid the "Gruesome" at All Costs: Never invest in a "financial black hole" business, no matter how cheap the stock price seems. The underlying business economics will likely destroy your capital.
In essence, the analogy teaches investors to judge a company not by its stock ticker or short-term news, but by the fundamental quality of its economic engine—how well it generates cash from the capital it employs.
======================================
Here is a summary of the article on "The Great, Good and Gruesome Businesses of Buffett":
Core Philosophy
The article advocates for investing in high-quality companies with a durable competitive advantage ("moat") and trustworthy management. The central principle is that "It is better to own the great companies at good prices, than the good companies at great prices." Long-term holding is recommended, provided the companies are purchased at fair or bargain prices, not at high prices.
Business Classifications
The article categorizes businesses into three types based on key investment factors:
Great Businesses:
Moat: High and rising competitive advantage, making it difficult for new companies to succeed.
Financials: High pricing power, high and stable return on capital, and they earn significantly more cash than they consume.
Investment Advice: "Load up" when available cheaply. They are described as a savings account that pays "extraordinarily high and rising interest."
Good Businesses:
Moat: Medium and steady, but competition is high.
Financials: Moderate pricing power and return on capital. They earn slightly more cash than they consume. Good management is crucial.
Investment Advice: Buy when available cheaply, as several opportunities will arise. They are like a savings account that requires constant new savings to maintain high interest.
Gruesome Businesses:
Moat: Low or non-existent, with easy entry for competitors.
Financials: Absent pricing power, low and falling return on capital, and they "burn" significantly more cash than they earn. High earnings growth is often a trap funded by new capital.
Investment Advice: Avoid, even when cheap, due to a high probability of being "value traps." They are like a savings account that pays inadequate interest.
Investment Pointers for Long-Term Success
The article provides specific advice for selecting stocks, particularly small caps, for long-term holding:
Select a small-cap stock that you are confident will grow its revenues and earnings for many years.
Identify a durable competitive advantage, even if it's difficult to spot in the early years.
Get in early and continue to monitor the company's performance.
Focus on quality by assessing both qualitative (e.g., management, moat) and quantitative factors (e.g., financials).
Do not focus too much on the share price, as it is considered the "least important" factor in the assessment. The primary focus should be on the quality of the business itself.
