Showing posts with label investment strategy in bear market. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investment strategy in bear market. Show all posts

Thursday 30 July 2009

'Stockmarkets climbing wall of worry'


'Stockmarkets climbing wall of worry'
The market action we have seen unfolding so far is very similar to the recovery from the March 2003 lows at the end of the ‘dotcom’ bear market.

By Jeff Hochman, director of technical analysis, Fidelity
Published: 2:49PM BST 29 Jul 2009


If that analogy holds, we can expect to see some market gyrations in the short term as investors wait for further evidence of economic and corporate improvement, which may be a few months away. Markets always have to climb this wall of worry and the fear of being left behind will become increasingly strong.

There is a risk that markets could fall by around 5pc, however this should be seen as a buying opportunity.

The alternative scenario is that markets stay fairly flat, within a trading range, before trending higher as each piece of new data adds weight to the evolving recovery story.

Renewed investor interest has helped emerging markets to move up strongly, so much so that they may see some short-term consolidation in what remains a strong secular story.

There is a considerable amount of money waiting on the sidelines in money market funds. This missed the first stage of the rally but it can be committed to the market once conditions improve.

Around two thirds of the money is institutional and some of it will be specifically allocated to cash, but a big chunk of it is cash that it is likely to be used for reallocating to equities.

By any historical standards, investors are currently holding extreme levels of cash at a time when the yield is modest. In the past, when cash levels have either met or exceeded the value of the equity market, this has marked a significant low.

Thursday 9 July 2009

How to invest in a bear market

How to invest in a bear market
The FTSE All Share Index lost 29pc in 12 months and there is more pain in store.

By David Stevenson, manager of the Ignis Cartesian UK Opportunities Fund
Published: 10:32PM BST 15 Jun 2009

UK equity investors have had a torrid time of it in the last year. The FTSE All Share Index lost 29pc in the 12 months to the end of March and there is more pain in store. Recent stock market rallies should be taken for what they were, short-term technical bounces rather than the market bottoming on improved fundamentals.

That said, for investors who are able to stomach the volatility and take a longer term view, there are positives. The UK stock market is at one of its lowest points in the last ten years.


In the coming 12 to 18 months, it is likely to fall further taking valuations to levels of 'cheapness' that only present themselves once or twice in a lifetime. Making the most of these opportunities, however, requires a suitable investment approach and there are key considerations for investors in a bear market.

Companies are under considerable pressure and investors need to look in detail at what they are potentially buying into.

This requires careful balance sheet analysis as heavily indebted businesses may not survive the coming years. This may seem extreme but is a reality of economic cyclicality. Companies with low or sustainable levels of borrowing, and which therefore have a degree of control over their future, are relatively attractive, especially when combined with a secure dividend yield.

Earnings provide a barometer of corporate health and are under pressure across the market. Investors can, however, mitigate that risk by targeting certain types of companies.

Defendable earnings are important and are typically generated by companies with big franchises, large market shares and leverage over competitors or suppliers, allowing them to eke out more market share or a better margin. Thinking big is generally a sensible approach.

Big brands have a footprint that will allow them to survive through a difficult environment. Companies like Vodafone, Centrica and Unilever are all likely to outperform, operating in areas where spending remains necessary. Food retailers and pharmaceutical companies are also attractive.

Investors should also focus on sectors that offer predictable growth, rather than those dependent on support from the economic cycle.

Secular trends currently include the long-term growth of outsourcing, both in the public and private sector, and the maintenance and operation of critical infrastructure, such as utility and telecommunication networks and transport links. Both of these should offer resilience in a downturn and will benefit if the government's stimulus plans come to fruition.

It pays for investors to be sceptical in all market conditions but particularly during a downturn. It is important to think independently and not be fooled by consensus views.

Fundamental analysis of balance sheets and earnings will give a clearer picture of companies' future prospects. This then allows a portfolio to be built 'bottom-up' without necessitating a 'top-down' view on overarching macroeconomic, consensus or benchmark themes.

For investors seeking exposure to the market via mutual funds it is important to analyse the investment approach of fund managers. There is a temptation for managers to alter their process when short-term performance numbers disappoint, as can happen in volatile markets.

This, however, tends to be detrimental. Proper analysis of a manager's track record is therefore important, paying particular attention to longevity, consistency of approach and performance during previous downturns.

Certain managers are suited to a rising market, others, typically those able to best identify potential balance sheet holes and signs of earnings weakness, fare better when business models come under increased pressure, as is currently the case.

Another point to consider is the level and type of trading in a fund. Fund managers are generally not good short-term traders. Investment views need to be made on at least a one year basis, and a bear market does not change that.

A sharp pickup in turnover within a portfolio may indicate panic trades or a fundamental shift in strategy. In a bear market the number of attractive stock ideas tends to fall.

This may justify holding a more concentrated portfolio, and then adding new positions when opportunities arise. The important point is to make sure a fund manager is not holding low conviction stocks for the sake of diversification.

Finally, it will pay to be patient. The UK stock market will recover, but not overnight. At the moment market conditions remain challenging and it would be foolish to invest expecting the market to bounce back straightaway.

Equities tend to move before economic data picks up but with the current levels of volatility it is prudent to wait for clear signs that leading indicators are improving and government stimulus packages have laid solid foundations for growth.

This is likely to be some way off but by reinforcing a portfolio based on the points above, and taking advantage of increasingly attractive valuations, long-term investment opportunities in the UK can be exploited.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5545094/How-to-invest-in-a-bear-market.html

Friday 26 June 2009

Bargain Stocks Are Everywhere

Bargain Stocks Are Everywhere
By Morgan House
June 25, 2009




Bet against the masses. Don't be the lemming. Be fearful when others are greedy.

Follow these simple rules, and you'll probably be a successful investor.

With those rules of thumb in mind, you'd be forgiven for thinking now is a terrible time to buy stocks. The S&P 500 is up more than 30% over the past three months or so, which is typically consistent with a market flooded with unrestrained optimism. Sure enough, some investors are preaching of an overvalued market that's gotten way ahead of itself.

Oh really?
And maybe they're right. But perspective is in order: When stocks bottomed out in early March, a better part of the investment community thought the world was about to explode. Companies like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) traded for trivial valuations because, quite literally, their deaths looked imminent.

Today, it looks like we've skirted most of those calamitous end-of-the-world threats. It's still terrible, mind you, just not as terrible as many thought. Naturally, stocks have sprung back to levels that reflect a deep recession, rather than a total Mad Max scenario.

This is an incredibly important distinction to make: Markets haven't risen to levels reflective of future optimism, but to levels consistent with a world that isn't about to fall into mass insolvency.

This is evident by looking at the biggest winners over the past few months. By and large, the stocks that have risen the most are ones you wouldn't recommend to your worst enemy. Have a look:

Company
3-Month Return
2009 EPS Estimates

Dollar Thrifty Automotive
756%
($0.85)

Avis Budget Group
430%
($0.66)

ArvinMeritor
188%
($1.24)


Data from Yahoo! Finance and Google Finance.


Are these companies destined for greatness? Did they announce a new blockbuster product? Are they the next Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), revolutionizing the way we access information in our everyday lives? Goodness, no. Not even close. Their huge gains are simply a reflection that they'll live to see another day.

This is a rally built on canceling out past pessimism, not pricing in future optimism. The biggest gains have been concentrated in very low-quality companies that are simply being given a second shot at life.

Not all gains are created equal
The idea that a stock is overvalued after a massive run-up is contingent on the idea that it was properly priced to being with.
But this was hardly the case when the market bottomed in March. More importantly, some of the highest-quality companies in the world have largely been left out of the rally and still trade at attractive prices.

Here are three in particular:

Company
3-Month Return
Forward P/E Ratio (FY 2009)

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A)
(1.9%)
16.0

Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG)
8.3%
13.2

Altria (NYSE: MO)
(0.4%)
9.5


Data from Yahoo! Finance.


What's to like about these three? Glad you asked:

We gab about the awesomeness of Warren Buffett enough here at the Fool, so I won't bore you with warm and fuzzy stories. I'll just give you the numbers: Over the past 15 years, Berkshire Hathaway has traded for an average of 1.91 times book value; today it trades for 1.30 times book value. I find that very intriguing, and think you should, too.

Whether you know it or not, you probably use several Procter & Gamble products. Its strong brands -- which range from Gillette to Cascade to Tide -- are in your bathroom, kitchen, and laundry room. Since 1994, P&G shares have traded at an average of more than 26 times earnings. Today, you can pick them up for 13 times earnings. That's the kind of opportunity that makes investing in recessions such a blast.

Altria -- maker of Marlboro cigarettes -- is a staggeringly simple business that generates huge amounts of cash. Investors are nervous about new regulations that put tobacco under the watch of the Food and Drug Administration and restrict tobacco advertising. But oddly enough, the new regulations may actually benefit Altria substantially. Limits on tobacco advertising make it harder for other cigarette makers to challenge Altria’s dominant market share. This would be a huge moat that few other businesses have -- the government is, in effect, limiting competition. If you're looking for international diversification, global sibling Philip Morris International (NYSE: PM) offers a lower yield but more growth opportunity.

Onward
Perspective can be a powerful thing: One year ago, Dow 8,500 would have been associated with the end of the world. Today, some want to treat it like it symbolizes irrational exuberance simply because we've bounced so far off the March lows. This is inherently flawed thinking. Focusing on a stock's percentage change over a short period of time is utterly meaningless. Drilling down on a company's intrinsic value and buying bargains like we haven't seen in decades is what's important.

And that's why our Motley Fool Inside Value team of analysts is having a field day digging through the rubble and finding cheap stocks like never before.


Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Berkshire, Altria, Procter & Gamble, and Philip Morris International. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Berkshire Hathaway is both a Motley Fool Stock Advisor and Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Procter & Gamble is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Philip Morris International is a Motley Fool Global Gains pick. The Fool owns shares of Procter & Gamble and Berkshire Hathaway and has a disclosurepolicy.

http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2009/06/25/bargain-stocks-are-everywhere.aspx

How Low Can Stocks Go?

How Low Can Stocks Go?
By Morgan Housel
January 23, 2009




Between Jan. 6 and Jan. 20, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 1,000 points. If it kept plunging at that rate, the index would hit zero in a matter of months.

Of course, we won't see zero. No matter how ugly the markets get, the pain we saw over these past few months can't continue for long.

But here's the bad news: Even though zero is out of the question, that doesn't mean stocks won't plummet from here. In fact, they could fall much, much further.

And history agrees.

What goes up...
The history of long-term market downturns is pretty abysmal. When times are bad, markets don't just get drunk with fear -- they start downing entire vodka shots of it.

At times like this, nobody wants to own stocks. Investors' palms begin to sweat every time they watch CNBC. They hide their heads in the hope that the pain will go away. They throw in the towel and sell stocks indiscriminately. In short, everything gets ugly.

Just how ugly? Have a look at the average price-to-earnings ratio of the entire S&P 500 index over these three periods of market mayhem:

Period
Average S&P 500 P/E Ratio

1977-1982
8.27

1947-1951
7.78

1940-1942
9.01

Compare that to the average P/E ratio today of 19.59 (as calculated by Standard & Poor's) and a seven-year average of more than 24, and it's apparent that stocks could fall much, much further than they already have, just by returning to the lows around which they historically hover during downturns.

Assuming that earnings stay flat, revisiting those historically low levels could easily mean a nearly 50% decline from here. For the Dow Jones Industrial Average, that'd correlate to roughly Dow 5,000 -- give or take. Of course, I'm not predicting, warning, or forecasting -- I'm just taking a long look at history.

But what if it did happen?
What would happen to individual stocks? Here's what a few popular names would look like trading at P/E ratios of 8:

Company
One-Year Return
Decline From Current Levels With P/E of 8

PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP)
(26%)
(44%)

Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL)
(22%)
(48%)

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT)
(41%)
(22%)

Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO)
(44%)
(54%)

Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN)
(37%)
(77%)

Monsanto (NYSE: MON)
(26%)
(58%)

Walgreen (NYSE: WAG)
(22%)
(36%)


Look scary? It is. And it could easily happen.

But here's the silver lining: Every one of those stocks -- heck, the overwhelming majority of stocks -- is worth much more than a measly eight times earnings. The only thing that pushes the average stock to such embarrassing levels is an overdose of panic, rather than a good reading on what the company might actually be worth.

Be brave
As difficult as it is right now, following the "this too will pass" philosophy really does work. No matter how bad it gets, things will eventually recover. Those brave enough to dive in when no one else dares to touch stocks will end up scoring the multibagger returns.

Need proof? Think about the best times you could have bought stocks in the past:
  • after the economy recovered from oil shocks in the '70s,

  • after the magnificent market crash of 1987,

  • after global financial markets seized up in 1998, and

  • after the 9/11 attacks that shook markets to the core.

As plainly obvious as it is in hindsight, the best buying opportunities come when investors are scared out of their wits and threaten to give up on markets altogether.

And that's exactly where we are today.

Pick what side you'd like to be on
The next few years are likely to be quite a ride. On the other hand, the history of the market shows that gloomy, volatile periods also provide once-in-a-lifetime opportunities that can earn ridiculous returns as rationality gets back on track.

This article was originally published on Oct. 18, 2008. It has been updated.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article PepsiCo is a Motley Fool Income Investor selection. Microsoft is an Inside Value pick. Amazon.com is a Stock Advisor recommendation. The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.

http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2009/01/23/how-low-can-stocks-go.aspx

Thursday 25 June 2009

Can You Stomach Another 40% Drop?

Can You Stomach Another 40% Drop?
By Dan Caplinger
February 20, 2009




After seeing the stock market lose half its value and head down toward six-year lows, you may feel like you've suffered more than you'd ever expected with your stock portfolio. Yet as another dour earnings season comes to a close, many see the potential for a much larger drop right around the corner.

The valuation conundrum
As dramatic as the drop in stocks has been since last summer, some market observers who focus on relative valuation wonder how the market has held up even as well as it has. If you focus on recent earnings numbers, the collapse in corporate profits among S&P 500 stocks paints an even bleaker picture of where the stock market ought to be trading.

According to The Wall Street Journal, trailing 12-month earnings for the S&P as a whole are likely to drop below $30, thanks to the recession. At least one pundit has applied an average earnings multiple of 15 to that number and come up with a projected value for the S&P 500 index below 450 -- more than 40% below its close at around 780 on Thursday.

Fair value, or foul?
The obvious counterargument to that dire prediction is that the recession has temporarily depressed earnings.
After all, earnings for the S&P 500 a year ago were closer to $80, which works out to a P/E below 10 at current levels. If earnings eventually recover to their 2007 levels, then stocks look exceedingly cheap at this point.

But there's no guarantee that earnings will recover anytime soon. Leaving the length of the recession aside, many of the businesses that drove growth over the past several years won't get back to their previous levels of profitability. Even among financial firms that seem likely to survive the crisis, such as Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), the business model and market conditions that allowed Wall Street to maintain strong profit growth for years no longer exist.

Put another way, even if earnings for the S&P 500 recover fairly strongly -- say 50% from their recession lows -- that still only gets them up to $45. And with the specter of inflation, huge budget deficits, and potentially higher interest rates on the horizon, a P/E ratio of 17 based on that $45 figure sounds fairly pricey.

Protecting against market risk
So with that gloomy prediction, what can you do to cover yourself no matter which way the market moves? One possibility is finding stocks that don't move in lockstep with the market -- and one way to find such stocks is by looking at their betas. Here are some examples of low-beta stocks, which you can see have held up pretty well in the recent bear market:

Stock
Beta (Past 3 Years)
1-Year Return
5-Year Average Return

Altria (NYSE: MO)
0
(25.8%)
9.3%

Aqua America (NYSE: WTR)
(0.05)
(0.5%)
5.6%

Genentech (NYSE: DNA)
0.11
17.1%
12.2%

Strayer Education (Nasdaq: STRA)
0.01
9.2%
12.4%

Fairfax Financial (NYSE: FFH)
0.05
0%
15. 7%


Source: Yahoo! Finance.


The concept of beta is often misunderstood. Many rely on beta as a pure measure of volatility, counting on high-beta stocks to be more volatile than stocks with low beta values. But that's only true to the extent that a stock's returns are correlated with the overall market. A stock that moves independently, however, might well show a low beta, but its overall price movements might be fairly volatile.

So while low-beta stocks may provide some protection against a crash, they're no guarantee of positive performance. And of course, if the market rebounds, you'd do better in high-beta stocks that take greater advantage of bull markets.

Be ready
No matter what you do to protect your money, you need to be prepared mentally for what you'll do if stocks crash again.
As unfair as it might seem to have to consider further losses after what you've already been through, counting on this being the worst of it is just too dangerous. As cheap as many stocks are right now, they could get cheaper -- and if you're on the edge of panicking already, you need to steel yourself for whatever comes next.



http://www.fool.com/retirement/general/2009/02/20/can-you-stomach-another-40-drop.aspx



For more on investing in tough times, read about:
Companies that will get better in a recession.
How you can profit when the recovery comes.
Stocks that could cause permanent losses.

Thursday 18 June 2009

Tips on how investors could build a large portfolio

Wednesday June 17, 2009
Tips on how investors could build a large portfolio
Personal Investment - A column by Ooi Kok Hwa



OWING TO the global economic downturn, some investors may have to put aside their aim of wealth accumulation lately. (Comment: This is the best time to invest.)

For now, wealth accumulation seems to be far away given their current low salary level, worsened by lower bonuses received or no salary increment.

As a result of the uncertainty arising from salary reduction or getting retrenched, some may even need to tap into their savings to survive through this period of difficulty.

We can fully understand this situation. However, we believe that we should consider building a portfolio at this time.

We may not want to rush in to buy stocks now in view of the current high prices. However, we need to prepare ourselves to “fish” good quality stocks at reasonable price levels if the market turns down again.

We will regret if we are not investing during this period because usually the best opportunities are discovered during a downturn.

Nevertheless, some investors think that it may not be realistic for them to invest now given that they are already having difficulties making ends meet.

However, we believe that we need to start somewhere. Every big portfolio always starts from a small one. If we never sit down and start thinking about building a portfolio, we will never get a big portfolio. Hence, we should start now and start small.

When our portfolio is about RM10,000 in size, a 10% return means a return of only RM1,000. However, when our portfolio grows to RM1mil, a 10% return means RM100,000!

Some investors may have the intention of building a portfolio but they do not know how to do so. In fact, some may depend on wealth advisers on this issue.

However, even if we get a very good, knowledgeable and responsible wealth adviser, we also need to equip ourselves with some knowledge in this area to make sure we make sound investment decisions; after all, we need to be responsible for our future.


We can gain this knowledge by reading books related to this topic or attending some training courses. (Comment: Get good financial education early.)

Know what we want to achieve

T. Harv Eker says in his book, Secrets of the Millionaire Mind, that “the number one reason for most people who do not get what they want is that they don’t know what they want.”

For example, if we want to have a good retirement, we will have to know how much we need for our retirement and plan ahead for it. To give you some ideas, there are quite a few websites that can provide free advice on how to determine your retirement needs.

Once we know how much we need for retirement and set it as an objective, we need to focus on growing our net wealth to achieve it.

Sometimes investors are too focused on their current income level and short-term gain that they end up neglecting the long-term growth of their net wealth. (Comment: Focus on the long-term, grow your portfolio, allowing compounding to work its magic over a long period.)

High income does not mean high net wealth if your expenses are higher than your income level. Hence, we need to control and monitor our expenses in order to have a net positive cash inflow instead of outflow.

If possible, we should have a cash budget that will guide us on the expected income to be received as well as the expenses to be incurred in the coming periods. We should try our best to stick to the plan and be committed to build our wealth.

Lately, some investors have been affected by high credit-card debts, which may be due to high expenses that cannot be supported by their current income.

During hard times, we need to plan carefully for big expenses and, if possible, we should delay expenditures which are not critical.

Given that nobody will know when our economy will recover, it is safer to spend less and try to reduce our debts.

In fact, if we have cultivated good spending habits from the start, regardless of economic situation, we will not have the problem of having to trim down unnecessary expenses during bad times. We have seen a lot of successful people living below their means and being very careful in spending money on luxury items. We should learn from these examples.

Don’t look down on low returns

Sometimes, a guarantee of low returns is better than the uncertainties of high returns, depending on the risk tolerance level of individuals. Always remember that risk and return go hand-in-hand. Not every investment product suits our return objective and risk tolerance level. (Comment: The smart investor searches for high returns with low risks ... yes, these investments are available, just be patient and be ready when the opportunities appear.)

Therefore, we need to understand the characteristics and nature of investment products that we intend to invest in before we make any investment decisions.

We cannot always think of big returns without considering the potential risks that we need to encounter. (Comment: Always assess the risk of downside first, then the reward of any upside. The risk/reward ratio should be favourable to your requirement of safety of capital and with a reasonable moderate return, before you invest.)

For those who like to play it safe, it will be wiser to go for defensive ways of investing, which means looking for stocks that pay good dividends and have solid businesses. (Comment: This is the safest route for the less savvy investors.)

Remember, we need to be patient, go slow and steady. If we can avoid making losses during this period, we should be able to achieve our financial goals when the economy recovers again.


Ooi Kok Hwa is an investment adviser and managing partner of MRR Consulting.


http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/6/17/business/4131454&sec=business

Wednesday 17 June 2009

Diary of a private investor: Three reasons why it is bigger risk to be out of the market

Diary of a private investor: Three reasons why it is bigger risk to be out of the market

Can the spring rally continue into summer? The FTSE 100 was crushed at a mere 3,512 on March 3. By early this week, it had risen to 4,500 – a 28pc jump.

By James Bartholomew
Published: 7:00AM BST 03 Jun 2009

In glorious Technicolor retrospect, it seems pretty obvious that the market was likely to recover from its March low since many individual shares at the time were at Armageddon-fearing valuations.

Indeed, I did mention in this diary in early March that a company called Staffline was priced at a “mere” 2.5 times its prospective earnings and the shares were “seriously cheap”.


Related Articles
95pc of finance professionals expect downturn to continue
Woodford: ' Recovery is a hell of a long way off'
Woodford's warning
Diary of a private investor: 'Dash for so-called trash shares has given me a 16pc return this year' Russia: 'The double digit returns seen during the Siberian winter are only the beginning'
FTSE 100 rebounds from sharp fall


These shares have risen 66pc since. And that illustrates the problem. Many such shares may well still be excellent value for the medium or longer term. But you would not use the phrase “seriously cheap” so freely now.

So what happens next? If that was a rally from extreme cheapness, what does the market do when it is merely excellent value? Last week I got a little nervous and sold some of my shares in Enterprise Inns, a pub company.

I reckoned May was ending and summer is the season when shares tend to do badly. Add in that the market has had such a terrific run and was there not a setback risk? Was it not a good idea to have more cash in hand?

But three things now make me think the bigger risk is being out of this market. The first is a paper by economist Tim Congdon, who has just created a new consultancy International Monetary Research.

In this he argues inflation will not take off in the next two years, contrary to my previous belief. I had thought all this monetary stimulus was likely to lead to serious inflation. If this happened, it would lead to higher interest rates, which would undermine any potential bull market.

But, looking at the American economy, Congdon examines major economic setbacks and finds in six cases out of seven since the Second World War, the inflation rate two years after a trough was lower that it had been previously. That is one worry of mine calmed.

The second influence again comes from Congdon. He went on to study how the stock market in America performed in the two years following a trough in economic activity. Of course, this is not America, but a similar story can probably be told here. In every case, shares rose.

And the third influence is the Coppock Indicator, devised by a man of that name many years ago. He asked bishops how long it takes people to recover emotionally from the loss of a loved one. He was told 11 to 14 months, and from that he built a system – presumably thinking it could take investors a similar time to get over losing their savings.

I believe his system has an excellent track record for confirming the start of bull markets. Well, the Coppock Indicator for the FTSE 250 has given a buy signal and apparently it is now inevitable it will do the same for the FTSE 100.

Given a new lease of confidence, this week I more than bought back the Enterprise Inns I had sold last week (sadly at a higher price). Before that I bought more shares in Telecom Plus, a utility provider at 291p.

I also bought more shares in Nippon Parking in Japan at Y4017 and Y4984; Home Products in Thailand at Thai baht 4.63 and 5.23, and Bumrungrad Hospital at Thai Baht 27.33. Most have attractive dividend yields.

I have also bought two chunks of shares in Cheung Kong, the Hong Kong property blue chip at HK$91.70 and HK$99.65.

I have financed the purchases by selling most of my yen. I have also sold my inflation-indexed gilts and most of my corporate bonds. Why so many Far Eastern shares? Because the proportion in my portfolio had become tiny and the bull markets there seem to be charging ahead.

I also fear that – despite the good medium prospect – Britain might have a lull over summer. I am still 20pc in cash and bonds. But if the market does weaken between now and November, at that point I intend to get 100pc invested.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5433916/Diary-of-a-private-investor-Three-reasons-why-it-is-bigger-risk-to-be-out-of-the-market.html

Message to investors – don't panic


Message to investors – don't panic

The stock market has reacted badly following the revelation that Lehman Brothers, the giant US investment bank has filed for bankruptcy, leaving investors wondering how to protect their savings.

By Paul Farrow
Published: 1:33PM BST 15 Sep 2008

In London staff at the bank's Canary Wharf offices turned up to work to hear the bad news Photo: ANTHONY UPTON

Millions rely on shares to provide for their retirement and the pessimistic outlook has left them asking: "Should I hold on to my shares, or cut and run before it's too late?''

With shares down more than 20 per cent on their peak, many will be tempted to sell. But the experts will tell you that even if you are sitting on losses, it may pay to grit your teeth and see the crisis through – particularly if you have held on through the past year. Are you investing for short-term profit or a long-term nest egg? If you are saving for retirement then hanging on to your shares could be the wisest decision.


Related Articles
'This is a once in a decade buying opportunity.'
How safe is your bank?
Lehman collapse: Be cautious but don't panic over the stock markets
Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcy as credit crisis bites
Market Report: Vodafone shares may be too much of a good thing
Gold can still live above $1000
Investing in shares is about your time in the market, not out of it. According to the fund manager Fidelity, a stake of £1,000 invested in the UK stock market 15 years ago would today be worth £3,261. But if you had missed the 10 best days since June 1993, the stake would be worth just £2,147. Stripping out the best 40 days slashes it to just £885.

Mark Dampier, head of research at Hargreaves Lansdown, says: "I think it is actually good news, although I understand why investors will have the jitters – they need to hold their nerve if they can. We need some banks to go under – the quicker that happens the quicker we can get out of this mess and it means we are a step nearer the bottom. It is not all good news, the economy will get worse, but much of that is priced in the stock market - we all knew Lehman was in trouble and it has not been that much of a surprise.

No one can predict what will happen and the best way to avoid boom-and-bust cycles is to make objective investment decisions that ignore fashions. There will be those managers who argue that the volatility will trigger buying opportunities, but there is no doubt that caution is the operative word at this juncture. The advice from the great and the good is not to panic.

But if you haven't already, it would be well worth reviewing your holdings to see if you are overexposed to any asset class or classes. Diversification and getting the balance right are vital.

Dampier – who has around 25 per cent of his own portfolio in cash – is buying shares on their bad days to take advantage of the price dips. He adds: "I think the FTSE100 will fall to below 5,000, but investing is never easy, but it is when markets are bad that it is the right time to stay invested - if you wait until share prices have stabilised you will have missed out on the gains.

Keep your balance as markets plunge


Keep your balance as markets plunge
A mix of different assets will keep your portfolio in positive territory amid the crunch.

By Rosie Murray-West
Published: 1:57PM BST 22 Sep 2008

Attitudes to risk and reward remain individual Photo: PA
For some people an unacceptable risk might be bungee jumping off the Empire State Building, while others might find it too frightening to board a plane.

But while attitudes to risk and reward remain individual, there are things you can do to make sure your investment portfolio is not overexposed to risky markets - and that it is not too safe to be making you any money. While no investment is entirely without risk, some are perceived as safer than others, but may produce lower returns.


Related Articles
Wine buyers defy credit crunch
'This is a once in a decade buying opportunity.'
Gilts to junk bonds ? spreading your risk
West Bromwich Building Society is not out of the woods yet, Moody?s says
Investments: Spread the risk to maximise returns
Nationwide's profits fall as FSCS levy costs £250m


Recent market volatility has encouraged some people to unbalance their portfolios by pulling out of areas that have not performed well, such as equities, according to Christopher Traulsen of Morningstar, the investment analyst. "Panic is never a good thing,'' he says. "Market timing is a difficult thing to get right. There is a tendency to think you need to remake your portfolio, but what you really need to do is look at your risk tolerance, and only maybe tilt your portfolio a little depending on the markets.''

Most investment managers recommend a balanced portfolio, unless you have large amounts of other wealth you can fall back on. "We ask how much can you afford to see your portfolio move and still sleep at night, and what is your time horizon,'' says Nigel Parsons of Bestinvest, the financial adviser.

Stockbrokers and financial advisers will offer at least three basic types of portfolio - high, low and medium risk - depending on how much time you have before you might need the money you are investing and your attitude towards risk.

The current market is completely different from others we have seen before, Parsons says, because the lack of interbank lending has "caused its lifeblood to dry up''. It is more important than ever that your portfolio is able to withstand this volatility.

Reducing the risk in your portfolio without losing its potential is a case of ensuring that you have your money invested in several different types of asset that tend to move at different times. For example, commodities are extremely volatile, but often rise as equities fall. "What you need to do is pair things that move in different ways,'' says Traulsen.

Carl Cross of Rensburg Sheppard, the investment manager, suggests splitting your money between British shares, overseas equities, fixed-income products and hedge funds. "It is the old adage - you need to juggle fear and greed,'' he says. "Some people are too reluctant to accept any volatility, and others cannot see that in the long term they will get superior returns from it.''

Even within the equities component of your portfolio, it is important not to rely too heavily on one part of the market. In order to properly balance your portfolio, says Traulsen, you need to know how the funds you are buying are managed.

"You need to understand how a manager positions his fund so you can take the right types of risk at the right time,'' he says. "For example, if you had bought all of the best-performing funds of 2006, you would be very heavily exposed to mid-cap stocks.'' He advises buying several funds that invest in different areas of the equity market.

When buying overseas funds, he suggests not being too narrow in your choice. "Steer clear of very focused funds - so don't just buy a fund focusing on Russia,'' he says. "Nobody knows what that will do in the next 10 years. Why pay a fund manager and then tie his hands behind his back by allowing him only one country to invest in? Buy an emerging market fund instead.''

A good fund manager will sell and buy stocks to reduce risk. For instance, the City of London investment trust, which has increased its share price by 55 per cent over five years, currently has a bias towards defensive and larger-cap stocks because of economic uncertainty.

To counteract your equities, it is important to invest in both government and corporate bonds, which involve different levels of risk. Government bonds, or gilts, are very low-risk, because the Government is unlikely to default on them, but they do not produce spectacular returns. "Gilts are gilts, so just buy the cheapest,'' says Cross.

Corporate bonds, another useful part of a balanced portfolio, are far riskier than government bonds because of the risk of default. However, Parsons points out that highly rated bonds that are unlikely to default are now available with very high yields. "The market is pricing in Armageddon,'' he says. "There are yields of 7 to 8 per cent on good corporate debt.'' Corporate bonds can be bought outright, but it may be easier to hold a corporate bond fund.

Meanwhile, Cross suggests that between 5 and 7 per cent of a portfolio should be held in hedge funds. "This is one area that most people don't understand,'' says Parsons. However, holding hedge funds may help protect you against falls in the equity market. He recommends funds run by Brevan Howard, including BH Global, which is now listed on the London Stock Exchange.

A combination of all of these asset classes ought to give you a safety net in a market like this, without minimising your returns. In fact, being well balanced is the only way to survive the storms.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/3050940/Keep-your-balance-as-markets-plunge.html

Opportunities still abound in tougher financial times

Opportunities still abound in tougher financial times

Published: 4:01PM GMT 19 Mar 2009

Managing client money in a downturn is proving to be the ultimate stress test. In an economic downturn, capital preservation becomes a greater consideration as investment risk increases.

Stockmarkets can experience sharp declines, volatility rises and traditional sources of income can be eroded. Such periods of economic difficulty also provide attractive opportunities. Being positioned with flexibility means it is possible to take advantage of these as they emerge.


Related Articles
Flight to bonds in tougher times
Record launch for new William Littlewood fund, Artemis Strategic Assets
Modesty will not help the UK escape the global economic crisis
World's largest bikini parade on Las Vegas Strip
FTSE100 rally: fund and share tips from the experts, part II


To manage client money successfully in a downturn we have to try to identify the environment in which we are operating. This has been made more difficult by the rapid change in the economic and financial landscape in recent months. But certain factors are apparent:

A number of leading banks have wiped out their capital. Governments have, however, made it clear that they will do everything possible to protect savers and keep the banking system functioning. This is good news, but investors need to be wary of any loss of nerve by the authorities as they face up to multiple bank recapitalisations.

We have entered a recession that will be deep and last for several years. There will be a sharp fall in the rate of inflation and we may even see a negative number this year. Interest rates will continue to fall.

Given the level of uncertainty, the value of capital and the extensive range of attractive opportunities available it makes no sense to lock up capital even if apparent returns are attractive. For example, investors in five-year structured notes backed by a bank whose credit rating is deteriorating, will attest to how uncomfortable they feel at present and how much poorer they are in the short term.

Equally, borrowing to invest even though interest rates are falling is unnecessary and potentially dangerous.

Backward-looking asset-allocation models have also failed to protect investors. Decade-long average returns and past correlations have been of little use over the past year and they will continue to provide poor guidance for a number of years to come.

Governments are fully occupied in an exercise that may best be described as battlefield triage of the financial system, while at the same time trying to work out how to sustain the rest of the economy and the confidence of consumers. They have now moved on to search for explanations as to what went wrong and who to blame.

On the other hand, investors should have a different agenda.

Liquidity in all asset classes is critical so that when the forced selling stops and the markets stabilise, investors will be able to use valuable capital to maximum effect. There are attractive opportunities in all asset classes.

Interest rates are low and probably heading lower. Returns on cash are correspondingly low, but having a good cushion of liquidity provides the flexibility to redeploy this quickly as opportunities open up. Gilt yields have tumbled, reflecting the decline in interest rates and the expectation that inflation will remain low for some time.

However, while this may hold true for now, the combination of substantial fiscal and monetary stimulus packages is likely to rekindle inflation in two years. This makes inflation-linked gilts look more attractive at present.

Corporate bonds have delivered a poor return over the past year as the default risk priced into them rises in step with the deterioration in the economic environment. However, there are a number of high-quality investment-grade bonds offering attractive yields well in excess of government stock.

Equity markets have slumped, but there are many good-quality businesses with strong balance sheets that are generating sufficient cash flow to support progressive dividend policies. Equities are an unloved asset class at present, but many quality companies in sectors such as oil and pharmaceuticals are sitting at attractive valuations. Commodities also have a role to play within a diversified portfolio.

Our focus at present is on gold and silver, rather than economically sensitive industrial metals. We regard the former as a hedge against the longer term inflationary implications of the action being taken to stimulate the economy, specifically low interest rates and the expansion of the monetary base.

We believe that successful investment is about managing risk, sensible diversification and taking advantage of opportunities as they occur.

Michael Kerr-Dineen is chief executive of Cheviot Asset Management

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5016903/Opportunities-still-abound-in-tougher-financial-times.html

'The market is as cheap as in 1953'

'The market is as cheap as in 1953'
When the market turns it will be one of the most stunning bull markets any of us has experienced.

By James Bartholomew
Published: 3:03PM GMT 19 Mar 2009

These are truly extraordinary times. Share prices of many smaller companies are almost unbelievably low. I was once told by an editor never to use the word "cheap" and he had good reason. You can say something looks "cheap" today and look pretty silly when it is even cheaper tomorrow. But really these times make it very difficult not to employ the "c" word.

There is no pleasing the market. On Monday, two of the companies in which I have serious stakes – worth more than 7pc of my portfolio – announced results. Aero Inventory, which manages aircraft parts for airlines, produced excellent profits – up by nearly half. How did the shares respond? They fell 17pc.


Related Articles
Opportunities still abound in tougher financial times
London rental market 'worst' performer
Gold falls for a third day
Bank bosses have bought just £1,500 worth of bank shares
Income funds in focus
Fantasy Fund Manager: Tips from the expert


Yes, there were one or two reasons for the fall. Above the rest, the company said it had not been able to agree terms for a new contract with a major airline. That was a disappointment. But the irony is in the past six months or so, I have been told that the share price has been weak because of fear of overexpansion leading to a need for capital-raising. So, one minute the company is distrusted because it is expanding too fast, the next it is spurned for not expanding quickly enough. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

The other company that reported on Monday is safe and exciting. Healthcare Locums, an agency for health and social workers, still slumped 6pc on Tuesday morning.

Sometimes the market seems moody. Shares can rise or fall 20pc with no apparent cause. I wonder if it can be occasionally a single, relatively modest buyer or seller who moves the market a great deal because the turnover in shares has fallen so low. Some of my shares, REA Holdings for example, can easily go through a day without a share being bought or sold. I would also guess that sometimes the buying and selling is just because some people – or funds – need cash.

In theory, this should provide an ideal hunting ground for those seeking good long-term investments. Aero Inventory is forecast by Numis Securities to make earnings per share this year of 83p. The share price earlier this week was 168p. So the share price was only a fraction over two times forecast earnings. Normally my rule of thumb is to say that anything with an earnings multiple of less than 10 is lowly rated. A good company on a multiple of five I would normally regard as extremely good value. But a multiple of two? That is astonishing.

No, gritting my teeth, I won't use the "c" word. But what can you say? It is hard to do justice to how astonishing this kind of valuation is. And it is not as though the company is in any discernible danger. Yes, it is geared but it is profitable and has banking facilities right the way through to 2013. Aero Inventory is an extreme example of the market as a whole.

On the bad side, the chart of the FTSE 100, like the chart of Aero, offers no encouragement. There has been no break in the downward trend. On the other, by any traditional measure, shares are excellent value. The redemption yield on 15-year government stock is currently 3.6pc, whereas the dividend yield on shares is 5.3pc.

Normally, it is the other way around: the dividend yield is lower than the return on government stock for the simple reason that, over time, dividends have historically risen whereas the yield on a government stock does not. True, some companies are reducing or cutting their dividends but this is at the margin. On this method of valuation, as far as I can discover, shares have not been such good value compared to government stock since about 1953.

My view is simple: shares are extremely good value, but it is impossible to know when the turn will come. When it does arrive, from this low valuation, it will be one of the most stunning bull markets any of us has experienced.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5017022/The-market-is-as-cheap-as-in-1953.html

Financial crisis: The options for nervous investors?

Financial crisis: The options for nervous investors?
For everyday investors who have so far stood firm and headed the calls not to panic, they must be wondering whether their courage will pay dividends.

By Paul Farrow
Published: 9:10AM BST 30 Sep 2008

The FTSE100 has fallen to four year low leaving investors wondering whether worse is to come.

Henk Potts at Barclays Stockbrokers, said: "Inevitably this will be an extremely volatile market for sometime and there are some big hurdles to overcome. But many people with a brave heart are seeing this as a buying opportunity - our ratio of buyers to sellers yesterday was 72:28."


Related Articles
Barclays to increase UK lending by £11bn
Is it too late to buy bank shares?
'The market is as cheap as in 1953'
Private investors pile in to bank shares
Why gilt investors aren't buying into Darling's fantasy world



This time a year ago the overall message was also to stay calm – although one stockbroker was a little more frank: "If you are going to panic, then panic early."

Those that refused to hold their nerve and did indeed panic, will be feeling smug right now because the bear market has long arrived. The FTSE100 has fallen from 6,200 to below 4,600 since 2004.

All but the most hardened investors will be wondering whether it still makes sense to cut and run. It is easy to be advised to stick with it, but seeing the pounds drop day by day is difficult to take – and with further woe widely predicted then who can blame investors from saying enough is enough.

Mark Dampier, head of research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "In all honesty no one has experience anything quite like this so any view is just that a view. In the UK the financial/property crisis will herald a UK recession for the whole of 2009. But stock markets are a discounting mechanism and will bottom well before the economy does which makes it very difficult to judge, as bad news will predominate.

"September and October are notoriously bad months in the stock markets and are living up to their name but we are now nearer the end game with markets. The politicians in the US will have to swallow their pride and egos as John Major did in 1992 and comeback with a package. This is not a bail out of Wall Street rich kids – it hits everyone and especially those in the real economy. It will be messy until economically illiterate politicians are made to see sense by the markets.

"At times like this I am reminded of the words of St John Templeton that 'the time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy'. We are surely getting very close to that point."

Andrew Merricks, at Brighton-based Skerritts Consultants, says: "Thinking logically, not every company will go bust (far from it), so there must be a floor to which valuations can fall before bouncing. Perhaps we need to take notice of other regions than the UK, which is traditionally where we feel most comfortable. The positives are, admittedly, relative, but there are some. Firstly, the dividend yield on the FTSE All Share has exceeded the yield on the 10-year gilt.

"This historically has been a great indicator to future share price rallies, with the last time this happened being in March 2003 just as the markets took off. The other similarity with 2003 is that there were articles at that time questioning whether equities would ever work again and we had entered the “capitulation” stage, when the everyday investor had given up hope. Today feels somewhat similar. The world will be a different place as a consequence of September 2008. If this is so, it should be at the top of everyone’s priorities who has savings, investments or pensions to reassess how theirs will fare as events unfold."

Boll Doll, vice-chairman and chief investment officer for global equities at BlackRock, said: "The current situation ranks among the most difficult investors have faced in memory, and perhaps in generations. De-leveraging and re-pricing of risk have been exacting a heavy toll on the housing, credit and equity markets. The volatility in oil and other commodity prices, coupled with uncertainty about the direction of government policy and the outcome of the coming election, have made it difficult for investors to find their footing.

Nevertheless, investors should recognise that we are in the midst of panic and outright liquidation conditions, which are usually signs of the climax in selling. While the U.S. financial sector (which has been at the heart of the problem) has experienced a significant downturn in recent weeks, that sector has not broken through the lows it established in mid-July. To us, all of this suggests that equity markets are still in the midst of a bottoming phase."

Anthony Bolton, the Fidelity fund guru – who has delivered the goods – says that if you find it difficult to stay invested in the bear market and are panicked by the bad news, then perhaps equity investing is not right for you. If that's you, cash is the obvious alternative. You can get rates of more than 6.5 per cent on the market. Bolton has started to buy shares over the past few days.

Gold is the other classic safe haven and despite its price rising in recent days as investors search for low risk assets, it is still viewed as such. About a year ago, the gold price was $667 an ounce, but it rose to a peak of over $1,000 on 17 March – coinciding with the collapse of Bear Stearns – before falling back to its current level of around $900 this week.

If you are worried about losing money, consider a guaranteed equity bond (Geb). These are fixed-term savings plans that pay out a proportion of any gains in the stock market index or indices to which they are linked. If the market falls, the initial investment is returned in full. But be aware that any index growth excludes dividends, which make a huge difference to overall returns. And ensure the plan gives you a cast iron guarantee that your capital will be returned in full whatever happens to the stock market.

For those happy to remain invested in shares, Bolton says to focus on large, good quality companies. Avoid at all costs smaller and medium-sized companies with weak balance sheets, he says.

And if you want to stick with it then take these words from Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most famous investor of them all for comfort. He wrote in 1937: "It is the one sphere of life and activity where victory, security and success is always to the minority and never to the majority. When you find anyone agreeing with you, change your mind. When I can persuade the board of my insurance company to buy a share, that, I am learning from experience, is the right moment for selling it."

Recession: How to invest

Recession: How to invest – an expert's view
Britain is on the brink of a recession and stock markets have been falling, leaving investors in a dilemma of where to invest. Nick Sketch, senior investment director Rensburg Sheppards Investment Management gives his view on where to put your money in the months ahead.

By Nick Sketch
Published: 9:14AM BST 24 Oct 2008

Nick Sketch at Rensburg Sheppards advises investors where invest for the recession. "Our policy remains to selectively increase risk, taking some cash off the sidelines to deploy into firstly corporate bond funds. We think that equities are cheaper than corporate bonds, in the same way that the latter are cheaper then gilts.

Nevertheless, we expect corporate bonds to outperform gilts before equities start going up in any useful way. In fact it is close to being a required precondition before equities can post a major & sustained recovery. Equities in aggregate should rise further on a (say) two or three year view than corporate bonds, but corporate bonds will rise first. What to buy depends on your risk tolerance and particularly on whether you are looking for a shorter term bounce or simply to buy long term value. After all, an active investor might buy corporate bonds now and then simply move some of that cash to equities if and when corporate bonds see a price recovery over the next few months.


Related Articles
Investors cash in Isas and unit trusts
Economic slump 'will knock £50,000 off average house price'
Bank of England pressured to make emergency interest rate cut
Insure yourself against a recession
Britain's first recession in 16 years may have begun


Much the same argument applies within the bond sectors. Non-financial-sector bonds may well start doing better before financial sector bonds, even though we expect financial sector bonds in aggregate to outperform non-financials over the next two or three years, as what we regard as their excessive undervaluation unwinds. However, financial sector bonds are in general a good deal more risky than non-financial bonds and are not likely to stop being so any time soon.

On this basis, a long term, risk-tolerant investor who does not want to trade too actively might just leap the intermediate steps and buy equities now. However, that would be going up the risk curve a long way. A cautious investor might buy some non-financial corporate bonds, but regard anything else as too risky.

And an active investor might well reckon that the best risk/return trade-off will come from owning non-financial corporate bonds now, then increasing the weighting in financial sector bonds.

Well-run corporate bond funds with low exposure to financial sector bonds certainly include the M&G Corporate Bond fund. Fidelity's corporate bond fund is still underweight in financial bonds too.

Corporate bond funds managed by Henderson are generally overweight financial bonds. Our favourite Henderson Bond funds, however, are not like-for-like competitors to the M&G & Fidelity funds – the Henderson Preference & Bond fund is in the riskier "Other Bond" category.

It is also worth remembering that well run funds in this area tend to have low fees. The Annual management fees of the Henderson, Fidelity and M&G funds are all well below 1 per cent. Thus, the hurdle of covering the fund's costs and then outperforming the benchmark is not being made impossible as a result of high fees on any of these funds. Moreover, given the high stock-specific risk in the sector, fees of that level look a small price to pay for good management and good diversification.

For the more contrarian-inclined, diversified global growth funds and the highest quality equities are additional options. Admittedly, this is some way short of advice to wholeheartedly “embrace” equity risk again, but until credit spreads narrow further and stocks reaction to “bad news” is more favourable, this is not felt to be advisable.”


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/3251558/Recession-How-to-invest--an-experts-view.html

How to invest in a bear market

Paralysis and panic is behind us now.

How to invest in a bear market
The FTSE All Share Index lost 29pc in 12 months and there is more pain in store.

By David Stevenson, manager of the Ignis Cartesian UK Opportunities Fund
Published: 10:32PM BST 15 Jun 2009

UK equity investors have had a torrid time of it in the last year. The FTSE All Share Index lost 29pc in the 12 months to the end of March and there is more pain in store. Recent stock market rallies should be taken for what they were, short-term technical bounces rather than the market bottoming on improved fundamentals.

That said, for investors who are able to stomach the volatility and take a longer term view, there are positives. The UK stock market is at one of its lowest points in the last ten years.

In the coming 12 to 18 months, it is likely to fall further taking valuations to levels of 'cheapness' that only present themselves once or twice in a lifetime. Making the most of these opportunities, however, requires a suitable investment approach and there are key considerations for investors in a bear market.

Companies are under considerable pressure and investors need to look in detail at what they are potentially buying into.

This requires careful balance sheet analysis as heavily indebted businesses may not survive the coming years. This may seem extreme but is a reality of economic cyclicality. Companies with low or sustainable levels of borrowing, and which therefore have a degree of control over their future, are relatively attractive, especially when combined with a secure dividend yield.

Earnings provide a barometer of corporate health and are under pressure across the market. Investors can, however, mitigate that risk by targeting certain types of companies.

Defendable earnings are important and are typically generated by companies with big franchises, large market shares and leverage over competitors or suppliers, allowing them to eke out more market share or a better margin. Thinking big is generally a sensible approach.

Big brands have a footprint that will allow them to survive through a difficult environment. Companies like Vodafone, Centrica and Unilever are all likely to outperform, operating in areas where spending remains necessary. Food retailers and pharmaceutical companies are also attractive.

Investors should also focus on sectors that offer predictable growth, rather than those dependent on support from the economic cycle.

Secular trends currently include the long-term growth of outsourcing, both in the public and private sector, and the maintenance and operation of critical infrastructure, such as utility and telecommunication networks and transport links. Both of these should offer resilience in a downturn and will benefit if the government's stimulus plans come to fruition.

It pays for investors to be sceptical in all market conditions but particularly during a downturn. It is important to think independently and not be fooled by consensus views.
Fundamental analysis of balance sheets and earnings will give a clearer picture of companies' future prospects. This then allows a portfolio to be built 'bottom-up' without necessitating a 'top-down' view on overarching macroeconomic, consensus or benchmark themes.

For investors seeking exposure to the market via mutual funds it is important to analyse the investment approach of fund managers. There is a temptation for managers to alter their process when short-term performance numbers disappoint, as can happen in volatile markets.

This, however, tends to be detrimental. Proper analysis of a manager's track record is therefore important, paying particular attention to longevity, consistency of approach and performance during previous downturns.

Certain managers are suited to a rising market, others, typically those able to best identify potential balance sheet holes and signs of earnings weakness, fare better when business models come under increased pressure, as is currently the case.

Another point to consider is the level and type of trading in a fund. Fund managers are generally not good short-term traders. Investment views need to be made on at least a one year basis, and a bear market does not change that.

A sharp pickup in turnover within a portfolio may indicate panic trades or a fundamental shift in strategy. In a bear market the number of attractive stock ideas tends to fall.

This may justify holding a more concentrated portfolio, and then adding new positions when opportunities arise. The important point is to make sure a fund manager is not holding low conviction stocks for the sake of diversification.

Finally, it will pay to be patient. The UK stock market will recover, but not overnight. At the moment market conditions remain challenging and it would be foolish to invest expecting the market to bounce back straightaway.

Equities tend to move before economic data picks up but with the current levels of volatility it is prudent to wait for clear signs that leading indicators are improving and government stimulus packages have laid solid foundations for growth.

This is likely to be some way off but by reinforcing a portfolio based on the points above, and taking advantage of increasingly attractive valuations, long-term investment opportunities in the UK can be exploited.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5545094/How-to-invest-in-a-bear-market.html

Wednesday 3 June 2009

After the bubble bursts

After the bubble bursts, a couple of things can happen.

The first is that the country will slip into a recession. You will see reports of layoffs and falling corporate profits. The Fed will actively drop interest rates, which will, in a year or so, respark the economy. The immediate impact of lower interest rates will be an increase in car and house sales. Seeing this, investors will anticipate the revival of the economy and jump back into the market. This time, though, they will be investing in the big names -like GE and Hewlett-Packard - that have earnings. They won't chase after the once-hot bubble stocks. Those stocks are dead until they begin earning money.

If the Fed's dropping of interest rates doesn't revive the economy, the country will slip into a depression and stock prices will really go to hell. It happened in the early 1920s, and the ensuing crash made 1929 pale in comparison. If that happens, you are in a major recession/depression and the stock market will be giving companies away. Value investors, including Warren, dream of such an opportunity, while the rest of the world dreads it. That's because Warren is a selective contrarian investor with a ton of cash and a long-term perspective.

However, Warren Buffett does not buy or sell baseed on what he thinks the market will do. He is price-motivated. This means that he will only invest when the price of the company makes business sense.

Sunday 31 May 2009

A review of Questor's share portfolio over six months

The good, the bad and the ugly – a review of Questor's share portfolio over six months

The current Questor editor has been in the hot seat at The Daily Telegraph for six months, so now seems like a good time to review the performance of the portfolio over that time.

By Garry White
Last Updated: 3:46PM BST 26 May 2009

Since the end of November last year, all of the shares recommended as buys in the Questor column are up 17pc, compared with a gain of 4.6pc in the FTSE 100. In aggregate, the portfolio is outperforming the market as a whole.

These figures are in terms of share price appreciation only and any dividends accrued or dealing costs are not included. Questor has pursued a relatively conservative investment strategy in these unprecedented market conditions, with a focus on balance sheet strength and dividends. So the income stream from these shares should also be strong – but that is not accounted for in this review. The accompanying graphic shows the 10 best recommendations and the 10 worst performing recommendations based on closing price on Friday May 22.

Questor aims to continue with the strategy that beat the market in the last six months and improve on the performance so far.

The Good

Questor has had considerable success riding the recovery in mining stocks. Vedanta shares, which are now rate a hold, have considerably outperformed the market – rising 185pc.

Questor recommended buying the shares because of its very strong cash position and its exposure to India. Other miners that have proved lucrative are Centamin Egypt (up 96pc), which is set to mine its first gold at its Sukari project in Egypt within weeks, Mexican silver miner Fresnillo (up 80pc) and Rio Tinto (up 55pc), which is currently battling to slash its crippling pile of debt.

Questor took profits in Fresnillo and Rio Tinto because of uncertain market conditions, although the shares have moved higher since then.

Questor makes no apology for this. The most difficult decision in investing is when to sell and investors do not go broke if they continue to bank gains.

Despite the recovery in appetite for risk, Questor believes a cautious investment strategy is the best way to play these markets and it is good to bank profits when they present themselves.

The bad

Questor's worst-performing tip is Gem Diamonds , which is down 37pc. Questor first recommended buying shares in the group because of its prize asset – the Letseng mine in Lesotho. The mine has produced three of the world's largest 20 diamonds in the last three years alone. In total, four of the largest 20 rough diamonds ever recovered have come from this one mine.

However, diamond prices continued to tumble, although there is some evidence of stabilisation in the market at present. Questor has restrained from closing out of this position because of the conviction that diamond prices will recover.

Perhaps Questor's worst tip so far was the premature recommendation to buy into an oil exchange traded fund, ETF Securities CRUD fund. Questor sold out of this position, advising investors to take the loss on the chin because the oil futures market moved against the investment and the capital investment was being eroded. The resulting loss was 30pc.

Gem Diamonds and ETF CRUD are the only two recommendations Questor regards as duds over the last six months. Shares in Lloyds insurer Catlin are down 18pc and defence group QinetiQ shares are off 17pc, but both shares still have a buy stance.

Catlin shares were hit after a £200m rights issue, but the group managed to post a 17pc year-on-year increase in the first quarter of the year.

QinetiQ, although it is facing some industrial dispute issues at the moment, has ambitious plans for its US unit, where it is forecasting double-digit growth.

The future

Questor remains to be convinced that the recent market rally is the start of the next bull run. A number of market commentators suggest that the weight of money sitting on the sidelines means that share-price gains will be a self fulfilling prophecy.

Questor feels it is best to be cautious and maintains a defensive strategy, while making some long-term strategic plays such as JP Morgan Indian Investment Trust (up 41pc) and BG Group (up 11pc), as well as dividend plays such as BP (up 3pc) and Northern Foods (up 21pc). Indeed, as the appetite for risk returned, defensive sectors such as utilities have been out of favour. Now looks like a good time to buy into these underperforming sectors.

Taking a long-term view, now is a great time to buy into the stock market. However, it is likely to be a bumpy ride as the year progresses.

The UK government has refused a freedom of information request to see the results of stress tests at major banks, which is concerning.

The full effects of the recession have not made their way into the real economy and unemployment is likely to continue to rise. When the property market will bottom out is anyone's guess.

As we move in to the second part of the year, the phrase "sell in May and go away" comes to mind. Questor does not suggest selling your portfolio, just banking good gains and watching out for opportunities to buy good companies at decent valuations when the opportunity arises. Questor aims to bring you the best of these opportunities over the coming months.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/questor/5383084/The-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly---a-review-of-Questors-share-portfolio-over-six-months.html

Friday 29 May 2009

When It's Too Late to Buy Stocks

When It's Too Late to Buy Stocks
By Selena Maranjian May 27, 2009 Comments (1)


There are good times to buy stocks, and bad times to buy stocks. But how do you tell the difference?

That's a tough question, especially recently. It's easy to look at bargains across a wide range of stocks and conclude that this must be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Still, some will argue that even after recent massive losses, the stock market can fall further.

Both of those viewpoints are valid.

But even though stocks could see more drops, there are still good reasons why you should consider buying anyway:
  • A falling market isn't the only risk. Since no one knows for sure which way stocks will move, it's possible you could find yourself sitting on the sidelines while the market rises.
  • Warren Buffett's longtime partner Charlie Munger recently noted, "If you wait until the economy is working properly to buy stocks, it's almost certainly too late ... I have no feeling that just because there's more agony ahead for the economy you should wait to invest."
  • Buffett himself has recommended that we: "Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful." Although the recent rally has rekindled greedy thoughts among investors, many are still fearful -- the stock market is still down substantially from its 2007 highs. That's why we've got so many bargains in plain sight.

Screening for possibilities In fact, you can pick up companies that have a combination of attractive features, including strong dividends, good growth prospects, and beaten-down prices. Witness the following selection of stocks, each of which has earned a top rating of five stars from our Motley Fool CAPS community:

Company
1-year return
Dividend yield
Est. 2010 EPS growth
NYSE Euronext (NYSE: NYX)
(53%)
4.2%
22%
ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP)
(49%)
4.2%
90%
BP (NYSE: BP)
(29%)
6.9%
53%
Arcelor Mittal (NYSE: MT)
(67%)
2.1%
1,156%
Total SA (NYSE: TOT)
(32%)
4.7%
29%
Diageo (NYSE: DEO)
(27%)
2.9%
14%
Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI)
(71%)
2.1%
244%
Source: Motley Fool CAPS.

Of course, these aren't recommendations -- just ideas for further research. Given how far some of these companies have seen their earnings fall, you'd expect to see high growth figures for 2010, even if they just return to their normal, pre-recession levels.

The market's handed us a huge platter of lemons over the past year, and it might just be time to start making lemonade. Take advantage of bargains while they last -- they might be gone before you know it.

http://www.fool.com/investing/value/2009/05/27/when-its-too-late-to-buy-stocks.aspx

Tuesday 12 May 2009

Hardest hit shares rise faster than the rest

Diary of a private investor: 'Dash for so-called trash shares has given me a 16pc return this year'

My shares which had been hardest hit – such as Enterprise Inns, which owns pubs – began to rise faster than the rest.

By James Bartholomew
Last Updated: 10:48AM BST 06 May 2009

'Enterprise Inns, which owns pubs, began to rise faster than the rest' Photo: GETTY This year has started extraordinarily well. As at the beginning of this week, my Individual Savings Account (ISA) in which I have most of my investments was up 16 per cent. That compares with a four per cent fall in the FTSE 100 index.

How on earth did this outperformance happen?


In the first few months, things went badly for me. But from early March, everything changed. My shares which had been hardest hit – such as Enterprise Inns, which owns pubs – began to rise faster than the rest. Some people have called this a "dash for trash" but that is unfair.

What has happened, rather, is the reverse of what occurred in 2008. At that time, panic and fear set in. I remember it vividly and felt it myself.

People sold out of any company that had the slightest element of doubt about its future: clothing companies – "demand might collapse"; banks – "you can't trust their supposed assets"; house-builders – "probably will go bust"; heavily-indebted companies – "the banks might pull the plug". Investors sold them down. Then others saw the shares falling and joined in the selling. The shares fell further and further to – I would suggest – absurdly low levels. Shares in Enterprise Inns fell so low that, to my mind, the share price was mere option money on the company's survival.

These companies were not really 'trash'. They were just ones who had extra problems to face in the recession. My difficulty was finding the courage to buy shares that had done nothing but fall for six months or more. How could one presume to call the bottom?

Well, I don't claim to have declared 'the bear market is over' loud and clear. The best I managed was to say in March that shares were "extremely good value". But I did steadily start re-investing, especially after Tim Congdon said with such confidence that the economy would turn round towards the end of this year because of the 'quantitative easing'.

I bought more share in R.E.A. Holdings, a palm oil plantation company, in Enterprise Inns, in Home Products a Thai DIY store chain, Staffline, a blue-collar recruitment company, Griffin Mining and a few others. Most of these have risen and some of them quite spectacularly.

I bought more REA Holdings at prices varying between 209p to 287p.The price has since soared to 350p. I added to my original purchase of Enterprise Inns at 69.75p with further purchases at 93.5p and 128.25p. Since then they have they have reached 160p.

One of the most satisfying moments came when Harvey Nash, a company that recruits staff particularly in Information Technology and outsources IT work, produced a good set of results last week. I have held a 'full weighting' in this company for many months now – that is to say a full ten per cent of all my financial assets. It seemed remarkable good value.

Now, finally, the stock market was reassured that yes, this company is getting through the recession in good shape. Its business model is working. The shares jumped by over a quarter in a single day. It was relief and the beginning of belief.

Frankly it has been a very exciting time and I think it will go further, albeit with relapses. The companies in which people lost almost all faith are still cheap on normal criteria. I am continuing to move out of 'safe' investments into more adventurous ones. Last Friday I bought a few shares in Carpathian at 22.75p. The company invests in Eastern European commercial property. It produced results and the conclusion of a strategic review that day.

The company announcement was one of the most impressive I have ever read. The managing director described the company's situation with clarity, addressing all the issues and details which investors and his bankers would want to understand. Yes, the company has endured a major loss in asset values.

Yes, it has been in breach of some of its banking covenants. There were details of each property and the loans attached. I reckoned that with such competent, articulate leadership the company will be able to keep the show on the road. Meanwhile the reduced net asset value is apparently 80p – more than three times the current share price. Worth a flutter, I thought.

To pay for this, I sold my recently purchased holding in index-linked government stock. The time will come for outright inflation hedges like index-linked stock. But perhaps that time has not arrived yet.

Right now it seems the turn of the shares which were heavily sold down to return to more sensible valuations. The fallen have become mighty. The rise of a share from a miserably unkind valuation to a fair one can mean a doubling and more.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5277843/Diary-of-a-private-investor-Dash-for-so-called-trash-shares-has-given-me-a-16pc-return-this-year.html