Questor: how to play the coming gold price jump
Questor explains why it thinks gold is a good investment and the options available to those looking to invest.
Garry WhiteLast Updated: 3:01PM GMT 04 Feb 2009
Questor's view
Gold has always been about wealth preservation - it does well in a time of crisis.
In good times there are better ways to make money than buying gold. However, equities are now volatile, house prices are falling and current interest rates make saving unattractive. Significantly, people no longer trust the banking system.
In the last few months gold has hit a series of all-time highs in sterling terms because of weakness in the pound - and it is likely to rise further.
Questor feels that now is a good time to look at all the different ways investors can buy into gold, be it coins, bullion or via funds. Questor is not recommending any specific dealers in the metal, but points you in the direction of the World Gold Council (WGC) investor website (www.invest.gold.org)
Click on "where to invest" and you will find a list of dealers in each of the different asset classes. There is a substantial amount of information on the site regarding gold and enough information to decide which asset is best for your own circumstances.
Questor remains a bull of gold through 2009 and urges investors without exposure to buy.
Here are some options available to investors.
Gold coins
The premium on gold coins such as sovereigns and Krugerrands has widened recently as demand for the coins has accelerated.
This means you have to pay more than their weight in gold to make a purchase.
This premium, which could be as much as 20pc, is partly due to their current popularity, but also because of what they are. You are, in effect, buying a piece of history. This will always demand a premium.
To find out more about premium, discuss this with a coin dealer listed on the World Gold Council's website. They should only be too happy to help.
Gold coins are an easy way of storing your wealth and they are easily transported. However, this means that you must pay attention to storage – and there will be insurance costs to consider as well.
Gold bars
You can also buy gold bars through bullion dealers. However, storage and insurance is a problem here too.
There are a number of organisations and mints which run certificate schemes for gold in their vaults.
This means you can invest in the precious metal without having to store the bars yourself. You receive a certificate of deposit showing how much gold is allocated to you.
Perhaps the most famous is the Perth Mint Certificate from Australia. This programme is the only government guaranteed certificate program in the world.
The same service is provided by a number of European organisations too – see the WGC website.
However, there are storage costs associated with this way to play gold. Make sure you check out all the details of the certificate programme before you invest.
Gold funds
Gold exchange traded funds (ETFs) have been around since 2003. It is a way of buying into movements in the gold price without physically storing the metal yourself.
Investors may be aware that in September a number of ETFs were suspended as they were backed by AIG products.
However, one gold ETF that was not suspended because it is backed by real gold was the ETF Securities Physical Gold fund, which trades on the London Stock Exchange under the symbol PHAU.
Some investors may have a US trading account. In this situation they may like to buy the world's largest gold ETF fund streetTRACKS Gold, which is listed in the US under the symbol GLD.
Gold shares
One of Questor's tips of the year is gold miner Centamin Egypt.
The company is set to become a gold producer in the second quarter of this year at the Sukari mine in Egypt.
A detailed analysis of the company was published in this column on Tuesday this week. The shares have risen 13pc since their recommendation and remain a buy.
Silver
Silver is also a precious metal that should not be ignored.
The price of silver tends to move with the gold price – and should the gold price spike, Questor expects that the silver price will rise too.
Questor's recommended investors buy into the world's largest silver producer Fresnillo on January 18.
The shares are up 34pc, after the silver price jumped 17pc since the recommendation was made. Shares in Fresnillo remain a buy.
The technical view
Although Questor does not believe technical analysis alone is a solid basis for making an investment decision, it is a useful tool. So, it is worth taking a look at the situation right now.
Citigroup analyst Yutaka Yoshino believes that the gold price could reach $1,190 or $1,300 in March or May. He thinks that gold has upward resistance at $933 an ounce (the current price is $901).
He argues that a push through $933 would increase the likelihood of gold renewing last spring's all-time high at an early stage.
However, if it fails to breach this level, it would be vulnerable to a pull back and any upward spike will be delayed until March or May.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/questor/4512793/Questor-how-to-play-the-coming-gold-price-jump.html
Thursday 5 February 2009
Wednesday 4 February 2009
Benjamin Graham's timeless key investing principles
Benjamin Graham's timeless key investing principles
Published: 2009/01/28
This is the first in a weekly series of articles by the Securities Industry Development Corp to help educate investors.
"TO ACHIEVE satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realise; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - these were the wise words of Benjamin Graham, the father of two fundamental investment disciplines - security analysis and value investing.
Not a name unheard of in the investing world, Benjamin Graham was an icon for many, including William J. Ruane and Irving Kahn. One of his most loyal and notable disciples, however, was Warren Buffet.
There is no better way to learn how to make it big in the investing world than learning it from the best and it doesn't get any better than Benjamin Graham.
Benjamin Graham was born in the UK in 1894 and moved to US when he was eight and a half years old. Although he came from a poor family, he was exceptionally bright at a young age. He graduated from Columbia University in 1914 and started his investment career by joining Wall Street as a financial analyst.
He established his first private investment organisation, the Benjamin Graham Joint Account, at the age of thirty two. During the Great Depression, between 1929 and 1932, he lost 70 per cent of his US$2.5 million (RM9.05 million) fund. Although some of his clients gave up, his fund managed to survive the worst, and by 1935, he recovered all the losses.
What did Graham consider as critical elements to successful investing? Here, we will briefly note the investing principles propoun-ded by Benjamin Graham.
Published: 2009/01/28
This is the first in a weekly series of articles by the Securities Industry Development Corp to help educate investors.
"TO ACHIEVE satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realise; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks." - these were the wise words of Benjamin Graham, the father of two fundamental investment disciplines - security analysis and value investing.
Not a name unheard of in the investing world, Benjamin Graham was an icon for many, including William J. Ruane and Irving Kahn. One of his most loyal and notable disciples, however, was Warren Buffet.
There is no better way to learn how to make it big in the investing world than learning it from the best and it doesn't get any better than Benjamin Graham.
Benjamin Graham was born in the UK in 1894 and moved to US when he was eight and a half years old. Although he came from a poor family, he was exceptionally bright at a young age. He graduated from Columbia University in 1914 and started his investment career by joining Wall Street as a financial analyst.
He established his first private investment organisation, the Benjamin Graham Joint Account, at the age of thirty two. During the Great Depression, between 1929 and 1932, he lost 70 per cent of his US$2.5 million (RM9.05 million) fund. Although some of his clients gave up, his fund managed to survive the worst, and by 1935, he recovered all the losses.
What did Graham consider as critical elements to successful investing? Here, we will briefly note the investing principles propoun-ded by Benjamin Graham.
* Understand the difference between investment and speculation.
Graham established a clear distinction between an investment and a speculation. To qualify as an investment, it must go through analysis, must have a good margin of safety and a satisfactory return. Speculation, on the reverse, merely involves timing and profiting from market fluctuation.
* Do a detailed analysis as stocks represent a share of business.
In the process of doing a detailed analysis, investors need to have the mindset of treating stock purchasing as if they own a piece of the business to evaluate stock prices from the perspective of the underlying asset value, financial strength and future earning prospect, instead of focusing on the short-term fluctuation of the market. This is regarded as the intrinsic value of the company.
Graham's most famous and influential motto is 'margin of safety'. The experiences that he cumulated during the frenzy of the Great Depression made a deep impression on him. He became a very cautious investor whose number one investment concern is the safety of investment principal.
If the intrinsic value of a stock is RM1 and you buy the stock at the price of 67 sen, then your margin of safety is 33 per cent. This serves as a cushion to your investment in the case of a market downturn or to provide you with a margin of error in calculating the intrinsic value, so that the chances of you losing your principal are at the lowest.
* Have a realistic return objective.
The objective of making an investment is to make money. However, Graham warns against aiming for unrealistic return objective. If you expect an abnormally high return from your investment, chances are you will be exposing yourself to unnecessary risk in order to achieve your return objective, which will become speculation instead of investment.
There is no short cut or quick ways to making money. Graham's way of investing is to set a realistic return objective and making investments based on sound investment principles and having the discipline to follow through.
* Treat the market as servant, not master.
Graham believes that risks and returns do not increase proportionately. He sees the opportunities in market volatilities. To him, the stock market is manic-depressive and investors should go for a bargain hunt during a market down turn.
The risk of investment can be significantly reduced if investors understand the business and apply good judgment based on the above first three elements in searching for good fundamental stocks, which are temporarily depressed due to market reasons.
However, he discourages making decisions based on any form of forecast and timing of the market. Instead, the decision making should be made based on price attractiveness.
Graham's stock selection criteria include a price-to-book ratio of 1.5 times, price-to-earnings ratio of below 20 times and debt-to-equity ratio of 0.5 times.
From the above, you can observe that Graham advocates defensive investing approaches. This later became the foundation of the investing principles of the famous investing guru, Warren Buffet, who learned about the quantitative screening process from Graham while working in Graham's company.
However, for a lay person to successfully apply Graham's approaches, you need to be prepared to overcome some hurdles. You need to do a lot of hard work and have good accounting knowledge in order to dissect the financial information provided in the annual report or other financial publications.
In addition to that, you will have to be highly sensitive to any news that will affect the performance of the company or the relevant industries. Having the ability to derive your own conclusion from your research, you will also then need to have the determination and faith in your work so as to prevent yourself from being blown away by the market.
This is the first in a weekly series of articles by the Securities Industry Development Corp to help educate investors. Incorporated in March 2007, SIDC is a leading capital markets education, training and information resource provider. For more tips on wise investing, log on to www.min.com. my
Jim Rogers and his theories of relativity
Jim Rogers and his theories of relativity
Jim Rogers. Investing legend or so the Alabama-born financial maven would like us to believe.
By Jame Quinn, Wall Street Correspondent Last Updated: 6:57PM GMT 03 Feb 2009
Jim Rogers is one of the best-known and most vocal investors in the world
Ever since the bow-tie wearing, world-travelling Mr Rogers appeared on the scene as one of the co-founders of the Quantum fund – along with George Soros – a vehicle that delivered a 4,200pc increase in value in a decade, he has not been shy about sharing his views with the world.
From commodities to oil to the dollar, when he speaks, the investment community tends to listen. That appeared to be true two weeks ago when he took on Gordon Brown and slammed sterling, saying the City of London was finished, and that the UK would be too once the North Sea's oil reserves ran dry.
The pound responded quickly, hitting a 24-year low later that day, as followers appeared to agree.
But as the Royal Bank of Scotland's Ross Walker and David Simmonds promptly pointed out, the UK has been running an oil deficit for four years, and manufacturing contributes more to the UK economy than the Square Mile ever has done.
Not that that stopped Mr Rogers predicting just last week that sterling would again reach parity with the dollar.
The problem with Mr Rogers' rants, however – as the past fortnight has perhaps shown – is that he is not always as right as he seems to think he is.
Take one of his more recent punts, on the rise of China and the growth of the Asian region as an economic superpower – a viewpoint in which he believes so strongly he has relocated to Singapore and is teaching his young children Mandarin.
But China's growth is slowing, and fast. From an annualised growth rate of 9pc in the third quarter of 2008, the International Monetary Fund predicts the Chinese economy will grow by 6.7pc in this year, its slowest pace of growth for more than seven years.
The Chinese economy is stagnating – as seen in news that more than 20m rural migrant farm workers had lost their jobs by the start of the recent lunar new year festivities. Mr Rogers may yet prove to be right in the long term, but not right now.
When it comes to oil, Mr Rogers has long been a bull, predicting a price of $200 a barrel long before last summer's $140-plus price squeeze, and again as recently as this month.
But his thesis is predicated on a lack of supply, which perhaps seems valid, until you look at his other theories.
After all, one of Mr Roger's favourite current mantras is that the US economy is ruined, thanks in part to the mishandling of the recent crisis by the Bush administration.
So, given that the US remains far and away the largest consumer of oil, if its economy is in freefall, surely its need for oil will wane sharply, freeing up supply?
The investment "guru" also contradicts himself by being bullish on the future of shares in airlines, a sector that tends to be crippled by high oil prices.
One of his most resounding ideologies is his unnerving belief in the value of commodities, which led to him being coined the "commodities king".
So fervent is his belief that in 1998 he even set up a tradable commodities index in his name - the Rogers International Commodities Index (RICI).
But, unfortunately for him and for those who have invested in it, the RICI delivered a negative return of 41.35pc in 2008 in large part due to the slump in commodity prices at the tail-end of last year. As a result, the index's return since inception, as at the end of December, was 159.36pc, a five-year low.
The RICI – which is based on a "basket" of 36 commodities – is led by the man himself, along with a committee of eight others from banks including Merrill Lynch and UBS.
Interestingly, crude oil and Brent account for 35pc of the indices' weighting, perhaps in part explaining the recent fall in its value.
To be fair, Mr Rogers has in the past admitted he is not the best when it comes to timing, and that when it comes to short-term trading, he is "horrible".
Behind the sound-bites for which he has become known, he recently admitted that if it hadn't been for shorting US banks and investing in the Japanese yen, his own personal portfolio wouldn't have made a profit last year.
Mr Rogers has proven to be bang on the money in the past, and his current overriding mantra, that Asian economies will replace those of the West, will be no doubt proven correct in the long-term.
But, to paraphrase an old adage, you shouldn't believe everything you hear, no matter who it is that's saying it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/4446729/Jim-Rogers-and-his-theories-of-relativity.html
Jim Rogers. Investing legend or so the Alabama-born financial maven would like us to believe.
By Jame Quinn, Wall Street Correspondent Last Updated: 6:57PM GMT 03 Feb 2009
Jim Rogers is one of the best-known and most vocal investors in the world
Ever since the bow-tie wearing, world-travelling Mr Rogers appeared on the scene as one of the co-founders of the Quantum fund – along with George Soros – a vehicle that delivered a 4,200pc increase in value in a decade, he has not been shy about sharing his views with the world.
From commodities to oil to the dollar, when he speaks, the investment community tends to listen. That appeared to be true two weeks ago when he took on Gordon Brown and slammed sterling, saying the City of London was finished, and that the UK would be too once the North Sea's oil reserves ran dry.
The pound responded quickly, hitting a 24-year low later that day, as followers appeared to agree.
But as the Royal Bank of Scotland's Ross Walker and David Simmonds promptly pointed out, the UK has been running an oil deficit for four years, and manufacturing contributes more to the UK economy than the Square Mile ever has done.
Not that that stopped Mr Rogers predicting just last week that sterling would again reach parity with the dollar.
The problem with Mr Rogers' rants, however – as the past fortnight has perhaps shown – is that he is not always as right as he seems to think he is.
Take one of his more recent punts, on the rise of China and the growth of the Asian region as an economic superpower – a viewpoint in which he believes so strongly he has relocated to Singapore and is teaching his young children Mandarin.
But China's growth is slowing, and fast. From an annualised growth rate of 9pc in the third quarter of 2008, the International Monetary Fund predicts the Chinese economy will grow by 6.7pc in this year, its slowest pace of growth for more than seven years.
The Chinese economy is stagnating – as seen in news that more than 20m rural migrant farm workers had lost their jobs by the start of the recent lunar new year festivities. Mr Rogers may yet prove to be right in the long term, but not right now.
When it comes to oil, Mr Rogers has long been a bull, predicting a price of $200 a barrel long before last summer's $140-plus price squeeze, and again as recently as this month.
But his thesis is predicated on a lack of supply, which perhaps seems valid, until you look at his other theories.
After all, one of Mr Roger's favourite current mantras is that the US economy is ruined, thanks in part to the mishandling of the recent crisis by the Bush administration.
So, given that the US remains far and away the largest consumer of oil, if its economy is in freefall, surely its need for oil will wane sharply, freeing up supply?
The investment "guru" also contradicts himself by being bullish on the future of shares in airlines, a sector that tends to be crippled by high oil prices.
One of his most resounding ideologies is his unnerving belief in the value of commodities, which led to him being coined the "commodities king".
So fervent is his belief that in 1998 he even set up a tradable commodities index in his name - the Rogers International Commodities Index (RICI).
But, unfortunately for him and for those who have invested in it, the RICI delivered a negative return of 41.35pc in 2008 in large part due to the slump in commodity prices at the tail-end of last year. As a result, the index's return since inception, as at the end of December, was 159.36pc, a five-year low.
The RICI – which is based on a "basket" of 36 commodities – is led by the man himself, along with a committee of eight others from banks including Merrill Lynch and UBS.
Interestingly, crude oil and Brent account for 35pc of the indices' weighting, perhaps in part explaining the recent fall in its value.
To be fair, Mr Rogers has in the past admitted he is not the best when it comes to timing, and that when it comes to short-term trading, he is "horrible".
Behind the sound-bites for which he has become known, he recently admitted that if it hadn't been for shorting US banks and investing in the Japanese yen, his own personal portfolio wouldn't have made a profit last year.
Mr Rogers has proven to be bang on the money in the past, and his current overriding mantra, that Asian economies will replace those of the West, will be no doubt proven correct in the long-term.
But, to paraphrase an old adage, you shouldn't believe everything you hear, no matter who it is that's saying it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/4446729/Jim-Rogers-and-his-theories-of-relativity.html
Why selling is a common problem
Why selling is a common problem
Published: 2009/02/04
Most investors tend to agree that the decision to sell a stock is one of the most difficult to make. Sometimes it is more difficult to decide when and what to sell than to buy. Ever wondered why?
* People tend to sell winners too soon and hold on to losers too long
You will find that regardless of whether the market is running hot or is coming down, there are still a lot of people out there who either sell their stocks too early only to realize that the prices continue to soar, or hold on to losers for too long only to see them continue to bleed further.
From a behavioural finance standpoint, this phenomenon is held by Hersh Shefrin and Meir Statman (1985) as the "disposition effect". This was discovered from their research entitled, "The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence".
Based on research, individual investors are more likely to sell stocks that have gone up in value, rather than those that have gone down. By not selling, they are hoping that the price of the losers will eventually go back to their purchase price or even higher, saving them from experiencing a painful loss.
In the end, most investors will end up selling good quality stocks the minute the prices move up and hold on to those poor fundamental stocks for the long term, while the performances of these stocks continue to deteriorate.
* People tend to forget their original objectives
In stock market investment, there are two types of investment activities, trading versus investing. Trading means "buy and sell" while investing means "buy and hold". The stock selection criteria for these two types of activities are entirely different.
Most of the time those involved in trading will choose stocks based on factors which will affect the price movement in short term, paying less attention to the companies' fundamentals whereas those involved in investment will go for good quality stocks which are more suitable for long-term holding.
However, you will find that many people get their objectives mixed up in the process. They get distracted by external factors so much so that some panic when the market goes in the direction that is not in line with their expectation, and as a result, end up selling the stocks that they find too expensive to buy back later.
On the other hand, some force themselves to change the status of the stocks that were originally meant for short-term trading into long-term investment as they are unable to face the harsh fact that they have to sell the stocks at a loss, even though they know that the stocks are not good fundamental stocks that can appreciate in value.
So, when to sell then?
There are few different schools of thoughts on this. Based on the advice from the investments gurus, like Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffet and Philip Fisher, when you buy a stock, you need to make sure that you understand the companies that you are buying, and these are good fundamental stocks, which will provide good income and appreciate in value in long term.
Therefore, you will be treating your stock purchase as a business you bought, which is meant for long term. You should not be affected by any temporary price movement due to overall market volatility.
You will only consider selling the company if the growth of the company's intrinsic value falls below "satisfactory" level or you find out that a mistake was made in the original analysis as you grow more familiar to the business or industry.
However, if you find that your investment portfolio is highly concentrated on one single company, then you might want to consider diversifying your portfolio and lowering your risk.
Any single investment that is more than 10 per cent to 15 per cent of your portfolio value should be reconsidered no matter how solid the company performance or prospect is, suggested Pat Dorsey of Morningstar.
Last but not least, if you find that by selling the stock, you can invest the money in a better option, then that is a good reason to sell.
In summary, successful investing is highly dependent on your self-discipline, taking away the emotional factors and not going with the crowd. It should always be backed by sound investment principles.
Always remember there is no short cut in investment, only hard work and patience.
Securities Industry Development Corp, the leading capital markets education, training and information resource provider in Asean, is the training and development arm of the Securities Commission. It was established in 1994 and incorporated in 2007.
http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/SIDC2/Article/index_html
Published: 2009/02/04
Most investors tend to agree that the decision to sell a stock is one of the most difficult to make. Sometimes it is more difficult to decide when and what to sell than to buy. Ever wondered why?
* People tend to sell winners too soon and hold on to losers too long
You will find that regardless of whether the market is running hot or is coming down, there are still a lot of people out there who either sell their stocks too early only to realize that the prices continue to soar, or hold on to losers for too long only to see them continue to bleed further.
From a behavioural finance standpoint, this phenomenon is held by Hersh Shefrin and Meir Statman (1985) as the "disposition effect". This was discovered from their research entitled, "The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence".
Based on research, individual investors are more likely to sell stocks that have gone up in value, rather than those that have gone down. By not selling, they are hoping that the price of the losers will eventually go back to their purchase price or even higher, saving them from experiencing a painful loss.
In the end, most investors will end up selling good quality stocks the minute the prices move up and hold on to those poor fundamental stocks for the long term, while the performances of these stocks continue to deteriorate.
* People tend to forget their original objectives
In stock market investment, there are two types of investment activities, trading versus investing. Trading means "buy and sell" while investing means "buy and hold". The stock selection criteria for these two types of activities are entirely different.
Most of the time those involved in trading will choose stocks based on factors which will affect the price movement in short term, paying less attention to the companies' fundamentals whereas those involved in investment will go for good quality stocks which are more suitable for long-term holding.
However, you will find that many people get their objectives mixed up in the process. They get distracted by external factors so much so that some panic when the market goes in the direction that is not in line with their expectation, and as a result, end up selling the stocks that they find too expensive to buy back later.
On the other hand, some force themselves to change the status of the stocks that were originally meant for short-term trading into long-term investment as they are unable to face the harsh fact that they have to sell the stocks at a loss, even though they know that the stocks are not good fundamental stocks that can appreciate in value.
So, when to sell then?
There are few different schools of thoughts on this. Based on the advice from the investments gurus, like Benjamin Graham, Warren Buffet and Philip Fisher, when you buy a stock, you need to make sure that you understand the companies that you are buying, and these are good fundamental stocks, which will provide good income and appreciate in value in long term.
Therefore, you will be treating your stock purchase as a business you bought, which is meant for long term. You should not be affected by any temporary price movement due to overall market volatility.
You will only consider selling the company if the growth of the company's intrinsic value falls below "satisfactory" level or you find out that a mistake was made in the original analysis as you grow more familiar to the business or industry.
However, if you find that your investment portfolio is highly concentrated on one single company, then you might want to consider diversifying your portfolio and lowering your risk.
Any single investment that is more than 10 per cent to 15 per cent of your portfolio value should be reconsidered no matter how solid the company performance or prospect is, suggested Pat Dorsey of Morningstar.
Last but not least, if you find that by selling the stock, you can invest the money in a better option, then that is a good reason to sell.
In summary, successful investing is highly dependent on your self-discipline, taking away the emotional factors and not going with the crowd. It should always be backed by sound investment principles.
Always remember there is no short cut in investment, only hard work and patience.
Securities Industry Development Corp, the leading capital markets education, training and information resource provider in Asean, is the training and development arm of the Securities Commission. It was established in 1994 and incorporated in 2007.
http://www.btimes.com.my/Current_News/BTIMES/articles/SIDC2/Article/index_html
The importance of having a good business plan
Wednesday February 4, 2009
The importance of having a good business plan
RSM EYE - By Girish Ramachandran
THE business plan remains the cornerstone in determining whether you can attract potential funders and investors.
However, statistics show that only 5% of business plans are read beyond the executive summary. And only 10% of proposals that pass the initial screening qualify for due diligence and receive funding.
That means on average, only six in 1,000 business plans get the funding they ask for.
Different types of funders look at business plans from different perspectives.
These individuals seek out businesses with good potential and sound strategies that will provide high financial returns, coupled with an option to exit the venture.
The 3Fs (founder, friends and family), angel investors and venture capitalists observe the highest risk levels as they gain entry into the business at its seeding points.
In contrast, to manage their risks, equity investors and commercial banks are more likely to look for entry points between the growth and maturity stages of the business.
The implication for entrepreneurs is that they must customise their business plan according to whether they are seeking funding from a bank or a venture capital fund.
A good business plan provides a clear roadmap to your corporate destination.
It may be your most important communication tool to investors. It will include a marketing plan, a management plan and financial projections for five years.
The financial projections are an integral part of the plan, since nothing speaks louder to bankers than numbers.
The marketing plan provides an overview of the business, its location and your marketing strategies. The management plan basically details the credentials and experience of those in the decision-making capacity.
To sum it up, you have to be prepared. Many people are unsure of what the bank can or cannot do for you, and why. Bankers expect you to know the basics before you walk in their door. Do your homework and set realistic assumptions.
A bank that wants to start a relationship with you will read your plan to know who you are and what you plan to do. Some things they are likely to look for:
The business background
You will have more credibility if you’ve had experience in the business and field you’re entering.
Attempt to show an overview of the market and highlight your advantages of your business over its competitors.
The business plan should detail strategies for breaking into the industry and show good potential for demand and further expansion.
People are an all important factor in a business, so describe the management team with short biographies of main managers.
Your financial projections
Bankers expect to see the three main financial statements – income statement, balance sheet and cash flow – projected monthly for the first year, and annually for four years after that. The cash flow is imperative.
These financial projections give bankers a sense of your profit and cash flow if they provide you with a loan.
You need to prove that you will have more than enough cash to cover the monthly loan repayments and any overheads.
The financial projections should mirror that of reality as much as possible. This implies that if you are able to obtain actual numbers (rents, insurance, equipments quotes and prices), use the actual numbers.
Some bankers like to say if they see too many zeros, they know the numbers aren’t reliable.
Take note, if you underestimate capital or operational expenses, you may end up overspending in the future and eating into your working capital.
Realism in your financials
Granted, you can’t really forecast your income or expenses. The temptation is to use over-optimistic assumptions to show strong projections.
That may work to your disadvantage in the long run. Over-optimism on your part will definitely come face to face with plenty of doubt on the banker’s.
The trick is to use conservative assumptions but still show strong projections. This is because bankers will compare your projections to industry reports on average performance of different kinds of businesses.
If you project margins way better than those, you’d better be able to explain why or how you’re going to accomplish that.
·Local alignment in the financials
Amounts have to logically match so that the amount you ask to borrow matches the financial gaps in your plan.
For example, don’t try to show you don’t need any money, because if you didn’t, you wouldn’t be borrowing. Don’t show that you need much more money than you can afford to borrow. Your cash flow should be realistic and show how much money you need and why.
A complete plan
A good banker will also expect to see a readable plan from executive summary through to the end. It should cover what you sell, your market, your company background, and specific dates and activities.
So the business plan is a two-way test.
Although most banks will require a plan, not all of them will really process the plan. Be grateful if they do. That means they are interested in your business and want to build a long-term relationship.
Girish Ramachandran is executive director of RSM Strategic Business Advisors. He is of the opinion that failure to plan is most certainly planning to fail. Feedback to this article is welcome. Please email starbiz@thestar.com.my
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/4/business/3188027&sec=business
The importance of having a good business plan
RSM EYE - By Girish Ramachandran
THE business plan remains the cornerstone in determining whether you can attract potential funders and investors.
However, statistics show that only 5% of business plans are read beyond the executive summary. And only 10% of proposals that pass the initial screening qualify for due diligence and receive funding.
That means on average, only six in 1,000 business plans get the funding they ask for.
Different types of funders look at business plans from different perspectives.
These individuals seek out businesses with good potential and sound strategies that will provide high financial returns, coupled with an option to exit the venture.
The 3Fs (founder, friends and family), angel investors and venture capitalists observe the highest risk levels as they gain entry into the business at its seeding points.
In contrast, to manage their risks, equity investors and commercial banks are more likely to look for entry points between the growth and maturity stages of the business.
The implication for entrepreneurs is that they must customise their business plan according to whether they are seeking funding from a bank or a venture capital fund.
A good business plan provides a clear roadmap to your corporate destination.
It may be your most important communication tool to investors. It will include a marketing plan, a management plan and financial projections for five years.
The financial projections are an integral part of the plan, since nothing speaks louder to bankers than numbers.
The marketing plan provides an overview of the business, its location and your marketing strategies. The management plan basically details the credentials and experience of those in the decision-making capacity.
To sum it up, you have to be prepared. Many people are unsure of what the bank can or cannot do for you, and why. Bankers expect you to know the basics before you walk in their door. Do your homework and set realistic assumptions.
A bank that wants to start a relationship with you will read your plan to know who you are and what you plan to do. Some things they are likely to look for:
The business background
You will have more credibility if you’ve had experience in the business and field you’re entering.
Attempt to show an overview of the market and highlight your advantages of your business over its competitors.
The business plan should detail strategies for breaking into the industry and show good potential for demand and further expansion.
People are an all important factor in a business, so describe the management team with short biographies of main managers.
Your financial projections
Bankers expect to see the three main financial statements – income statement, balance sheet and cash flow – projected monthly for the first year, and annually for four years after that. The cash flow is imperative.
These financial projections give bankers a sense of your profit and cash flow if they provide you with a loan.
You need to prove that you will have more than enough cash to cover the monthly loan repayments and any overheads.
The financial projections should mirror that of reality as much as possible. This implies that if you are able to obtain actual numbers (rents, insurance, equipments quotes and prices), use the actual numbers.
Some bankers like to say if they see too many zeros, they know the numbers aren’t reliable.
Take note, if you underestimate capital or operational expenses, you may end up overspending in the future and eating into your working capital.
Realism in your financials
Granted, you can’t really forecast your income or expenses. The temptation is to use over-optimistic assumptions to show strong projections.
That may work to your disadvantage in the long run. Over-optimism on your part will definitely come face to face with plenty of doubt on the banker’s.
The trick is to use conservative assumptions but still show strong projections. This is because bankers will compare your projections to industry reports on average performance of different kinds of businesses.
If you project margins way better than those, you’d better be able to explain why or how you’re going to accomplish that.
·Local alignment in the financials
Amounts have to logically match so that the amount you ask to borrow matches the financial gaps in your plan.
For example, don’t try to show you don’t need any money, because if you didn’t, you wouldn’t be borrowing. Don’t show that you need much more money than you can afford to borrow. Your cash flow should be realistic and show how much money you need and why.
A complete plan
A good banker will also expect to see a readable plan from executive summary through to the end. It should cover what you sell, your market, your company background, and specific dates and activities.
So the business plan is a two-way test.
Although most banks will require a plan, not all of them will really process the plan. Be grateful if they do. That means they are interested in your business and want to build a long-term relationship.
Girish Ramachandran is executive director of RSM Strategic Business Advisors. He is of the opinion that failure to plan is most certainly planning to fail. Feedback to this article is welcome. Please email starbiz@thestar.com.my
http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/2/4/business/3188027&sec=business
High returns not sustainable in global crisis: Singapore GIC
Agence France-Presse - 2/2/2009 8:47 AM GMT
High returns not sustainable in global crisis: GIC
High returns obtained for 20 years by one of Singapore's sovereign wealth funds will not be seen during the global credit crisis, the firm's deputy chairman said in remarks published Monday.
The Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC), one of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds, announced in September that its nominal annual rate of return over the past 20 years was 7.8 percent in US dollar terms.
However, deputy chairman Tony Tan Keng Yam said the firm, which has bailed out international financial institutions hit by the economic turmoil, said the economic environment had made such profits very unlikely.
"I do not expect GIC or any other large investor to be able to reproduce the type of high returns which GIC was able to deliver in the last 20 years," Tan was quoted as saying in an interview with the Straits Times.
"It's now a completely different economic and financial environment which all investors, all companies have to deal with -- and this will last for quite some time," Tan said.
In late 2007 and early last year GIC injected billions of dollars into Swiss bank UBS as well as US banking giant Citigroup, which suffered massive losses from US subprime, or higher-risk, mortgage investments.
Subprime troubles later evolved into the worldwide financial slowdown.
Governments and central banks have stepped in with stimulus packages and other measures to confront the crisis. If these measures work, the world's economy could start to recover later this year, Tan said in the interview.
A recession that lasts into 2010, however, could be a sign of "systemic change in the world economy," he said.
In a weekend speech to the World Economic Forum of global leaders in Davos, Switzerland, Tan said sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors will play an important role in the stabilisation and eventual recovery of asset markets.
"Such institutions, with their long-term investment horizons could be important sources of demand for undervalued assets.
"This would contribute to stabilising financial and household sector losses, thereby helping to restore both credit creation and demand in the real economy," said Tan, whose speech was released by GIC.
http://news.my.msn.com/regional/article.aspx?cp-documentid=2315533
High returns not sustainable in global crisis: GIC
High returns obtained for 20 years by one of Singapore's sovereign wealth funds will not be seen during the global credit crisis, the firm's deputy chairman said in remarks published Monday.
The Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC), one of the world's largest sovereign wealth funds, announced in September that its nominal annual rate of return over the past 20 years was 7.8 percent in US dollar terms.
However, deputy chairman Tony Tan Keng Yam said the firm, which has bailed out international financial institutions hit by the economic turmoil, said the economic environment had made such profits very unlikely.
"I do not expect GIC or any other large investor to be able to reproduce the type of high returns which GIC was able to deliver in the last 20 years," Tan was quoted as saying in an interview with the Straits Times.
"It's now a completely different economic and financial environment which all investors, all companies have to deal with -- and this will last for quite some time," Tan said.
In late 2007 and early last year GIC injected billions of dollars into Swiss bank UBS as well as US banking giant Citigroup, which suffered massive losses from US subprime, or higher-risk, mortgage investments.
Subprime troubles later evolved into the worldwide financial slowdown.
Governments and central banks have stepped in with stimulus packages and other measures to confront the crisis. If these measures work, the world's economy could start to recover later this year, Tan said in the interview.
A recession that lasts into 2010, however, could be a sign of "systemic change in the world economy," he said.
In a weekend speech to the World Economic Forum of global leaders in Davos, Switzerland, Tan said sovereign wealth funds and other institutional investors will play an important role in the stabilisation and eventual recovery of asset markets.
"Such institutions, with their long-term investment horizons could be important sources of demand for undervalued assets.
"This would contribute to stabilising financial and household sector losses, thereby helping to restore both credit creation and demand in the real economy," said Tan, whose speech was released by GIC.
http://news.my.msn.com/regional/article.aspx?cp-documentid=2315533
Tuesday 3 February 2009
2009 MARKET OUTLOOKS
Ignis: 'Double-digit returns by the end of next year are entirely achievable'
Increasingly attractive valuations in the stock market contrast with poor returns available from bank deposits, says asset manager.
Last Updated: 4:40PM GMT 19 Dec 2008
IGNIS ASSET MANAGEMENT – 2009 MARKET OUTLOOKS
UK: Ralph Brook-Fox, manager, Ignis UK Focus Fund
“The UK stock market over the next three months should trough as the poor economic data continues to flood in. Earnings estimates will continue to fall, which they must do before we can be confident that expectations have fully adjusted.
“Markets are forward-looking, however, and once the recovery gets under way, I expect the UK market to perform respectably. Indeed, given increasingly attractive valuations, I believe double-digit returns by the end of next year are entirely achievable, especially given the increasingly poor returns available from bank deposits.
“Investors will need to be brave to avoid missing the boat and we are looking to start rotating into more cyclical names early next year, as defensive stock valuations appear increasingly stretched. Rate cuts and falling inflation favour a move into the consumer sector, but with no guarantee that consumers will spend and not save their money, stock selection will be key. Selectively, we believe clothing retailers will do well but are steering clear of stocks related to the housing market where the overhang of negative equity and limited credit availability will drag for some years.
“Rotating into more cyclical stocks is not an immediate priority, however, as we expect the news flow in the first quarter to be poor. There is no point getting beaten-up by the market when you know the punches are coming. The middle of that gloomy period, however, could be an opportune time to start looking at companies that will do well for the rest of the year.”
Emerging Markets: Bryan Collings, managing partner, HEXAM Capital
“We believe emerging markets will come out of the global crisis stronger than developed markets. From a global perspective emerging markets still exhibit the best fundamentals from almost every angle. Corporate health is good and balance sheets are generally robust, significantly more so than in developed markets.
“2009 will be the year in which deflation plagues the developed markets. Most of these would, in their current state, fail to meet the original Maastricht criteria for entry into the euro. Many emerging markets, in contrast, would pass the tests with relative ease. Deflation is, however, unlikely to occur in emerging markets, where we see inflation coming in around 4pc per annum over the next three years.
“Emerging markets are particularly compelling in terms of valuations. At just seven times earnings, stocks are insanely cheap and have been brutally oversold, down almost 60pc year-to-date as a whole. Given this, it is well worth remembering that the bounce in the first five days after the market hits the bottom is usually vicious and can reclaim over 40pc of previous losses. This is a distinct possibility in 2009.
“Fundamentally, the next two quarters are likely to see bearish macro and micro news, with slowing economic and earnings growth. This clearly poses a threat to any sustained equity market rallies, if only because of the bearish mood of the market. The bad news, however, has been more than priced into emerging markets and we remain positive for 2009 given current levels.”
Corporate Bonds: Chris Bowie, head of credit, Ignis Asset Management
“Investment grade credit has never been better value – ever. Forced sellers of corporate bonds have created a situation where investors can achieve comfortable double-digit yields on household names. Sainsbury’s, for instance, has a 14pc yield while investors can secure 16pc with Barclays, HBOS or RBS. Aviva is yielding 15pc and Standard Life 12pc. Even away from financials and retailers, there are yields of 10pc with the likes of Firstgroup, BT and Imperial Tobacco.
“For perspective, a typical bank account would take seven years to achieve a return equal to the annual yield you can buy on a Sainsbury’s secured bond. Equities look more attractive, with dividend yields rising sharply, but this is because capital values are plunging over earnings fears and we believe companies will be cutting dividends in 2009. The outlook for property next year is equally bad.
“Bonds are not risk-free of course and the default risk is undoubtedly higher than in recent years. Some companies will fail in 2009 but these are unlikely to include high street supermarket chains or banks with a government guarantee for the next three years. This risk is more than priced into yields already.
“Inflation is, of course, the enemy of bonds, but in the near term the risk is deflation as a result of the drop in economic activity. Deflation may be destructive to the real economy, but it is a major positive for bonds.
“Admittedly, the lack of liquidity in corporates means that it is difficult to get out of the asset class cheaply, so a corporate bond investment has to be for the long-term, at least for a year. Corporate bonds have, however, been battered to such an extent in the last 18 months that this is the best buying opportunity in several generations.”
Europe: Adrian Darley, head of European equities, Ignis Asset Management
“After an incredibly volatile 2008, it is already apparent what many of the investment issues will be for 2009. At a stock level it is clear that consensus earnings expectations are still too high for many companies. The key question for investors is not where earnings will bottom but what is already priced into company valuations.
“There is a danger that a myopic focus on how bad 2009 may be, could lead to similar mistakes made in 2003. This resulted in a focus on difficult short-term news flow and investors missing out when European equity markets subsequently rose more than 37pc in just eight months – based partly on falling interest rates. This is not to underestimate the global challenges many companies presently face. It does, however, highlight that, as in previous cycles, policy-makers are reacting fast. This time they are spending money and cutting interest rates more aggressively than ever before. The credit crunch will slow the speed at which this feeds through into economic growth, but the policy-makers’ actions will undoubtedly make a difference. There have also been recent examples of shares rising significantly on so-called bad profit warnings, which is a clear sign that investors are starting to see through the fog.
“Predicting investor behaviour will be important heading into 2009 and it appears most investors will enter the year positioned defensively, with high cash levels and overweight positions in telecoms and pharmaceuticals. Any shift in this stance could trigger aggressive sector rotation, as we saw in 2003. At this stage it makes sense to enter 2009 with a more balanced and less defensive portfolio than was appropriate in 2008. This means slowly increasing cyclical exposure through financial and industrial stocks, with individual stock selection vitally important. After such large stock market falls there are always excellent investment opportunities.”
Asia Pacific: Andrea McNee, CIO international equities, Ignis Asset Management
“The economic news coming out of Asia is deteriorating quickly and this is likely to continue into 2009. The impact of global deleveraging has only just hit Asia’s real economies and it will take time to work its way though. Many Asian governments are cutting interest rates and bringing in fiscal stimulus packages, while commodity prices are lower than they were. These are all positives for the region. There is a question mark, however, over whether consumers, in a time of rising unemployment and global uncertainty, are in the mood to spend the extra money in their pockets.
“The main risk is the corporate earnings outlook. Earnings estimates for 2009 are still too high and have further to fall, with downgrades likely to continue. This will abate at some point and there are positive signs emerging, with analysts’ forecasts becoming more consensual and volatility coming down from an extremely high level. It is also worth noting that certain firms will profit from the downturn. Much of their competition could be wiped out and there is money to be made from identifying strongly-managed businesses able to ride out the current slump. Also, for Asia, unlike the West, this is cyclical rather than structural and Asia has the fiscal muscle and healthy foreign exchange reserves to cushion the impact of a deteriorating environment.
“The key for markets in 2009 will be visibility. Once markets see clear evidence that there is an economic recovery on the way and that company earnings could rise, there is the potential for a significant rally. Calling the start of this is difficult although visibility should improve in the second half of the year. It is unlikely we have seen the bottom just yet, with the upswing in mid-December looking like a classic bear market rally. Equally, now is not the time to sell out of Asia.”
Multi-Manager View: Simon Mungall, partner, Maia Capital
“UK retail investors seeking an income in 2009 are not spoilt for choice. The Bank of England’s base rate is at 2pc and is likely to be cut further. UK equity income funds, the traditionally popular alternative for fund investors, flatter to deceive.
“UK equity income funds perform well in an environment in which equity issuers can continue to pay dividends. Last year, many investors claimed bank stocks looked good value on the basis of their dividend yields. This, however, assumed that banks would continue to be able to pay their dividends and, at some point, the price of equity in banks would rise to reflect this. In fact, the price of bank stocks was a better guide to the future than their dividends, which are, of course, at the discretion of management.
“Coupon income on conventional bonds is contractually guaranteed and failure to pay it puts the issuer in default. In the event of a default, the claims of a corporate bond investor are senior to the equity holder, meaning the bond investor gets paid first.
“Corporate bonds can provide an attractive yield in a safer part of the capital structure than equities. There is also a medium-term prospect of capital gains if and when corporate bond valuations return to par. Not only is the corporate bond market offering an attractive income, it is currently offering rates of return more commonly associated with the equity market, and importantly at a lower level of risk.
“Economic fundamentals will be undoubtedly difficult in 2009 and financing will remain scarce and expensive. Consequently corporate defaults will rise significantly and will probably continue at high levels until well into 2010. Proper issuer analysis is therefore essential to successful corporate bond investing, and even funds run by the best corporate bond managers will suffer defaults in a market of this nature. In our experience, however, the default rates of these higher quality funds have been less than a quarter of the number of defaults in the market as a whole. The message for 2009 is, therefore, to choose carefully or entrust your money to specialist managers who will do it for you and that corporate bond funds could be an attractive option for 2009.”
US: Terry Ewing and Alison Porter, co-managers, Ignis American Growth Fund
“The downturn in the US stock market has been consistent with previous bear markets, but the speed of the fall has been very different. Even during the much milder recession of 2001, the market took two years to reach a bottom. The current downturn is less than a year old.
“US equity markets traditionally fare better under a democratic administration. The economy is, however, the more important factor and President-elect Obama will come to power following one of the worst quarters of economic performance in US history. US economic growth is likely to fall to between -2pc and -4pc in the first three months of the year and, as such, earnings expectations for US companies will have to come down significantly from current levels.
“Obama has, however, already impressed Wall Street with his economic appointments and a more strategic approach to dealing with the financial crisis will engender greater confidence. His approach to foreign affairs could also restore the standing of the US abroad in the longer term, which ultimately will help the valuation of the market by reducing risk premium.
“Additionally, US policy-makers have been quick to act in the face of the downturn. They announced more stimulus packages in the last six months than the Japanese government did in the first eight years of the Japanese slowdown. Base rates are likely to be cut to 0pc – part of the US Federal Reserve’s quantitative easing that appears to know no bounds.
“Following his forthcoming stimulus package, Obama is likely to bring in direct and immediate tax cuts in addition to Roosevelt-like infrastructure building plans aimed at getting Middle America back to work. This will aid the economy in the second quarter of the year and will be an investment theme for the Ignis American Growth Fund throughout 2009, as certain companies will benefit from infrastructure development.
“Deflation will also be a theme in 2009 with certain companies well-positioned to benefit from falling prices, either because of their balance sheet strength and ability to pay significant dividends, or because lower commodity prices will shrink their cost base. Increasing consolidation in the airline, insurance and retail sectors should also benefit those companies well-positioned to take market share from competitors, and therefore profit from a stronger pricing environment due to restricted capital flows.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/shares/3851888/Ignis-Double-digit-returns-by-the-end-of-next-year-are-entirely-achievable.html
WEF 2009: Global crisis 'has destroyed 40pc of world wealth'
WEF 2009: Global crisis 'has destroyed 40pc of world wealth'
The past five quarters have seen 40pc of the world's wealth destroyed and business leaders expect the global economic crisis can only get worse.
By Edmund Conway in Davos
Last Updated: 5:42AM GMT 29 Jan 2009
Steve Schwarzman, chairman of private equity giant Blackstone, said an "almost incomprehensible" amount of cash had evaporated since the financial crisis took hold.
"Business will be very different," he added.
His comments came on a day of the World Economic Forum characterised by the gloom of its participants and warnings that the crisis will endure for some time. News Corp chief executive Rupert Murdoch kicked off the meetings by warning that the atmosphere was worsening – despite global economic confidence plumbing the lowest depths on record.
"The crisis is getting worse," he said. "It's going to take drastic action to turn it around, if it can be turned around, quickly. I believe it will take a long time."
Executives participating in an economic brainstorming session said that despite the trauma caused by the economic and financial problems, another crisis at some point in the future was inevitable.
Sir Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics and a former Bank of England policymaker said: "The outlook is pretty grim. Things are not good and business surveys are coming out showing they're getting even worse."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/4374492/WEF-2009-Global-crisis-has-destroyed-40pc-of-world-wealth.html
Related Content
More on Davos
WEF 2009: headlines on Jan 28
Britain to suffer worst recession of any advanced nation, says IMF
Blackstone fund bucks trend to end at $21.7bn
WEF 2009: headlines on Jan 29
More on ...
Davos
Finance
Economics
Financial Crisis
Finance Predictions 2009
The past five quarters have seen 40pc of the world's wealth destroyed and business leaders expect the global economic crisis can only get worse.
By Edmund Conway in Davos
Last Updated: 5:42AM GMT 29 Jan 2009
Steve Schwarzman, chairman of private equity giant Blackstone, said an "almost incomprehensible" amount of cash had evaporated since the financial crisis took hold.
"Business will be very different," he added.
His comments came on a day of the World Economic Forum characterised by the gloom of its participants and warnings that the crisis will endure for some time. News Corp chief executive Rupert Murdoch kicked off the meetings by warning that the atmosphere was worsening – despite global economic confidence plumbing the lowest depths on record.
"The crisis is getting worse," he said. "It's going to take drastic action to turn it around, if it can be turned around, quickly. I believe it will take a long time."
Executives participating in an economic brainstorming session said that despite the trauma caused by the economic and financial problems, another crisis at some point in the future was inevitable.
Sir Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics and a former Bank of England policymaker said: "The outlook is pretty grim. Things are not good and business surveys are coming out showing they're getting even worse."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/4374492/WEF-2009-Global-crisis-has-destroyed-40pc-of-world-wealth.html
Related Content
More on Davos
WEF 2009: headlines on Jan 28
Britain to suffer worst recession of any advanced nation, says IMF
Blackstone fund bucks trend to end at $21.7bn
WEF 2009: headlines on Jan 29
More on ...
Davos
Finance
Economics
Financial Crisis
Finance Predictions 2009
Australia faces worse crisis than America
Australia faces worse crisis than America
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business EditorLast Updated: 3:24PM BST 22 Sep 2008
Comments 51 Comment on this article
Many fear the economic party in Australia will end badly
The world's financial storm has swept through Australia and New Zealand this week amid mounting signs of contagion across the Pacific region.
Financial shares were pummelled in Sydney on Tuesday after investor flight forced National Australia Bank (NAB) to slash a £400m bond sale by two thirds. The retreat comes days after the Melbourne lender shocked the markets by announcing a 90pc write-down on its £550m holdings of US mortgage debt, an admission that it AAA-rated securities are virtually worthless. In New Zealand, Guardian Trust said it was suspending withdrawals from its mortgage fund owing to "liquidity difficulties in the market".
Global economy is at a danger point
More Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Hanover Finance - the country' third biggest operator - last week froze repayments to investors. The company said its "industry model has collapsed" as the housing market goes into a nose dive. Some 23 finance companies have gone bankrupt in New Zealand over the last year.
It is now clear that the Antipodes are tipping into a serious downturn. Australia's NAB business confidence index fell to its lowest level in seventeen years in June. New Zealand's central bank began to cut interest rates last week on fears that the economy may have contracted in the second quarter, and is now entering recession. Housing starts slumped 20pc in June to the lowest since 1986.
Gabriel Stein, from Lombard Street Research, said Australia could prove vulnerable once the global commodity cycle turns down. It has racked up a current account deficit of 6.2pc of GDP despite enjoying a coal, wheat, and metals boom, effectively spending its resources bonanza in advance. Household debt has reached 177pc of GDP, almost a world record.
"It is amazing that in the midst of the biggest commodity boom ever seen they have still been unable to get a current account surplus. They have been living beyond their means for 10 years. What worries me is that productivity growth has been very low: they have coasting after their reforms in the 1990s," he said.
Australia's Reserve Bank has had to grapple with vast inflows of Asian capital, especially Japanese money fleeing near zero rates at home. Short of imposing currency controls, it would have been almost impossible to stop the inflows.
"The easy money went straight into real estate," said Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas.
"Australia will now have to generate 4pc of GDP to meet payments to foreign holders of its assets," he said. This is twice as high as the burden faced by the US.
Both the Australian and New Zealand dollars have fallen hard in recent days and now appear to be breaking down through key technical support against major currencies, including the US dollar. "The Aussie is going down, big time," said Mr Redeker.
The picture is darkening across the Pacific Rim. The Bank of Japan's deputy governor, Kiyohiko Nishimura, said its economy may now be falling into a "technical recession". Household income dropped 2.1pc in June compared to a year earlier and manufacturers are the gloomiest since the deflation crunch in 2003.
The decision by National Australia Bank to make drastic provisions on its US mortgage debt could have ramifications in the US itself. It opted for a 100pc write-off on a clutch of "senior strips" of collateralized debt obligations (CDO) worth £450m - even though they were all rated AAA. No US bank has admitted to such fearsome loss rates.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/2794032/Australia-faces-worse-crisis-than-America.html
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business EditorLast Updated: 3:24PM BST 22 Sep 2008
Comments 51 Comment on this article
Many fear the economic party in Australia will end badly
The world's financial storm has swept through Australia and New Zealand this week amid mounting signs of contagion across the Pacific region.
Financial shares were pummelled in Sydney on Tuesday after investor flight forced National Australia Bank (NAB) to slash a £400m bond sale by two thirds. The retreat comes days after the Melbourne lender shocked the markets by announcing a 90pc write-down on its £550m holdings of US mortgage debt, an admission that it AAA-rated securities are virtually worthless. In New Zealand, Guardian Trust said it was suspending withdrawals from its mortgage fund owing to "liquidity difficulties in the market".
Global economy is at a danger point
More Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Hanover Finance - the country' third biggest operator - last week froze repayments to investors. The company said its "industry model has collapsed" as the housing market goes into a nose dive. Some 23 finance companies have gone bankrupt in New Zealand over the last year.
It is now clear that the Antipodes are tipping into a serious downturn. Australia's NAB business confidence index fell to its lowest level in seventeen years in June. New Zealand's central bank began to cut interest rates last week on fears that the economy may have contracted in the second quarter, and is now entering recession. Housing starts slumped 20pc in June to the lowest since 1986.
Gabriel Stein, from Lombard Street Research, said Australia could prove vulnerable once the global commodity cycle turns down. It has racked up a current account deficit of 6.2pc of GDP despite enjoying a coal, wheat, and metals boom, effectively spending its resources bonanza in advance. Household debt has reached 177pc of GDP, almost a world record.
"It is amazing that in the midst of the biggest commodity boom ever seen they have still been unable to get a current account surplus. They have been living beyond their means for 10 years. What worries me is that productivity growth has been very low: they have coasting after their reforms in the 1990s," he said.
Australia's Reserve Bank has had to grapple with vast inflows of Asian capital, especially Japanese money fleeing near zero rates at home. Short of imposing currency controls, it would have been almost impossible to stop the inflows.
"The easy money went straight into real estate," said Hans Redeker, currency chief at BNP Paribas.
"Australia will now have to generate 4pc of GDP to meet payments to foreign holders of its assets," he said. This is twice as high as the burden faced by the US.
Both the Australian and New Zealand dollars have fallen hard in recent days and now appear to be breaking down through key technical support against major currencies, including the US dollar. "The Aussie is going down, big time," said Mr Redeker.
The picture is darkening across the Pacific Rim. The Bank of Japan's deputy governor, Kiyohiko Nishimura, said its economy may now be falling into a "technical recession". Household income dropped 2.1pc in June compared to a year earlier and manufacturers are the gloomiest since the deflation crunch in 2003.
The decision by National Australia Bank to make drastic provisions on its US mortgage debt could have ramifications in the US itself. It opted for a 100pc write-off on a clutch of "senior strips" of collateralized debt obligations (CDO) worth £450m - even though they were all rated AAA. No US bank has admitted to such fearsome loss rates.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/2794032/Australia-faces-worse-crisis-than-America.html
Australia steps up recession fight with new stimulus plan and interest rate cut
Australia steps up recession fight with new stimulus plan and interest rate cut
The Australian government has unveiled a second multi-billion dollar stimulus package that it hopes will lift the country out of a deepening slowdown and protect-against a full-blown recession.
By Bonnie Malkin in Sydney
Last Updated: 8:37AM GMT 03 Feb 2009
Kevin Rudd, the prime minister, announced the $42bn plan just hours before the country's central bank, citing the grimmest global outlook in many years, cut interest rates by 1 per cent to 3.25 per cent - its lowest level in 45 years.
The stimulus package, which includes $28bn for infrastructure projects and school improvements, will send the budget into the red for the first time in nearly a decade.
Mr Rudd's government is mirroring the action of most across the world as politicians increase their collective efforts to prevent what's already a deep and global downturn getting worse.
The package comes on top of one launched late last year worth A$10.4 billion ($7.4 billion) and underscores the threat to Australia's resources-based economy, which has shuddered to a near halt since the worldwide financial turmoil began.
Many analysts believe the economy will enter a recession in the next quarter and not start to show signs of recovery until the end of the year. Mass job losses are expected, especially in the vulnerable mining sector.
"The combination of expansionary monetary and fiscal policies now in place will help to cushion the Australian economy from the contractionaru forces coming from abroad, " Glenn Stevens, the Governor of Australia's central bank said in explaining the decision to lower the key interest rate to 3.25pc.
The news prompted the Australian dollar to rise against the US dolar and saw the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 Index clim almost 1pc to 3522.6.
Those gains were seem across Asian stock markets as news of Australia's new measures were added to by Japanese plans to buy shares held by Japanese banks. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 was up 2.3pc on the prospect that the Bank of Japan would help Japanese banks improve the state of their balance sheets. It said it would purchase up to one trillion yen worth of stocks through April 2010.
The Australian initiatives, spread over four years, include building thousands of new houses and school rooms, and environmentally friendly measures such as providing householders with free home roof insulation. It also features cash bonuses to low and middle-income earners that the government hope will be ploughed back into the economy, rather than saved.
In a move aimed at getting Australians to spend some money, more than half Australia's population of 21 million will be eligible for A$950 ($600) tax bonuses or grants. The spending will plunge the annual budget into a A$22.5 billion ($14.2 billion) deficit — 1.9 percent of gross domestic product — for the current fiscal year ending June 30, the prime minister said.
"Nobody likes being in deficit and I don't like being in deficit at all," Mr Rudd said. "This is not a question of choice. This is what we are required to do."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/4443093/Australia-steps-up-recession-fight-with-new-stimulus-plan-and-interest-rate-cut.html
The Australian government has unveiled a second multi-billion dollar stimulus package that it hopes will lift the country out of a deepening slowdown and protect-against a full-blown recession.
By Bonnie Malkin in Sydney
Last Updated: 8:37AM GMT 03 Feb 2009
Kevin Rudd, the prime minister, announced the $42bn plan just hours before the country's central bank, citing the grimmest global outlook in many years, cut interest rates by 1 per cent to 3.25 per cent - its lowest level in 45 years.
The stimulus package, which includes $28bn for infrastructure projects and school improvements, will send the budget into the red for the first time in nearly a decade.
Mr Rudd's government is mirroring the action of most across the world as politicians increase their collective efforts to prevent what's already a deep and global downturn getting worse.
The package comes on top of one launched late last year worth A$10.4 billion ($7.4 billion) and underscores the threat to Australia's resources-based economy, which has shuddered to a near halt since the worldwide financial turmoil began.
Many analysts believe the economy will enter a recession in the next quarter and not start to show signs of recovery until the end of the year. Mass job losses are expected, especially in the vulnerable mining sector.
"The combination of expansionary monetary and fiscal policies now in place will help to cushion the Australian economy from the contractionaru forces coming from abroad, " Glenn Stevens, the Governor of Australia's central bank said in explaining the decision to lower the key interest rate to 3.25pc.
The news prompted the Australian dollar to rise against the US dolar and saw the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 Index clim almost 1pc to 3522.6.
Those gains were seem across Asian stock markets as news of Australia's new measures were added to by Japanese plans to buy shares held by Japanese banks. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 was up 2.3pc on the prospect that the Bank of Japan would help Japanese banks improve the state of their balance sheets. It said it would purchase up to one trillion yen worth of stocks through April 2010.
The Australian initiatives, spread over four years, include building thousands of new houses and school rooms, and environmentally friendly measures such as providing householders with free home roof insulation. It also features cash bonuses to low and middle-income earners that the government hope will be ploughed back into the economy, rather than saved.
In a move aimed at getting Australians to spend some money, more than half Australia's population of 21 million will be eligible for A$950 ($600) tax bonuses or grants. The spending will plunge the annual budget into a A$22.5 billion ($14.2 billion) deficit — 1.9 percent of gross domestic product — for the current fiscal year ending June 30, the prime minister said.
"Nobody likes being in deficit and I don't like being in deficit at all," Mr Rudd said. "This is not a question of choice. This is what we are required to do."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/4443093/Australia-steps-up-recession-fight-with-new-stimulus-plan-and-interest-rate-cut.html
Let banks fail, says Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz
Let banks fail, says Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz
The Government should allow every distressed bank to go bankrupt and set up a fresh banking system under temporary state control rather than cripple the country by propping up a corrupt edifice, according to Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize-winning economist.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Davos
Last Updated: 8:29AM GMT 02 Feb 2009
Comments 40 Comment on this article
Let banks fail, says Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz
Professor Stiglitz, the former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told The Daily Telegraph that Britain should let the banks default on their vast foreign operations and start afresh with new set of healthy banks.
"The UK has been hit hard because the banks took on enormously large liabilities in foreign currencies. Should the British taxpayers have to lower their standard of living for 20 years to pay off mistakes that benefited a small elite?" he said.
"There is an argument for letting the banks go bust. It may cause turmoil but it will be a cheaper way to deal with this in the end. The British Parliament never offered a blanket guarantee for all liabilities and derivative positions of these banks," he said.
Mr Stiglitz said the Government should underwrite all deposits to protect the UK's domestic credit system and safeguard money markets that lubricate lending. It should use the skeletons of the old banks to build a healthier structure.
"The new banks will be more credible once they no longer have these liabilities on their back."
Mr Stiglitz said the City of London would survive the shock of such a default because it would uphold the principle of free market responsibility. "Counter-parties entered into voluntary agreements with the banks and they must accept the consequences," he said.
Such a drastic course of action would be fraught with difficulties and risks, however. It would leave healthy banks in an untenable position since they would have to compete for funds in the markets with state-run entities.
Mr Stiglitz's radical proposal is a "Chapter 11" scheme for households to allow them to bring their debts under control without having to go into bankruptcy. "Families matter just as much as firms. The US government can borrow at 1pc so why can't it lend directly to poor people for mortgages at 4pc. ," he said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/4424418/Let-banks-fail-says-Nobel-economist-Joseph-Stiglitz.html
The Government should allow every distressed bank to go bankrupt and set up a fresh banking system under temporary state control rather than cripple the country by propping up a corrupt edifice, according to Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel Prize-winning economist.
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Davos
Last Updated: 8:29AM GMT 02 Feb 2009
Comments 40 Comment on this article
Let banks fail, says Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz
Professor Stiglitz, the former chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told The Daily Telegraph that Britain should let the banks default on their vast foreign operations and start afresh with new set of healthy banks.
"The UK has been hit hard because the banks took on enormously large liabilities in foreign currencies. Should the British taxpayers have to lower their standard of living for 20 years to pay off mistakes that benefited a small elite?" he said.
"There is an argument for letting the banks go bust. It may cause turmoil but it will be a cheaper way to deal with this in the end. The British Parliament never offered a blanket guarantee for all liabilities and derivative positions of these banks," he said.
Mr Stiglitz said the Government should underwrite all deposits to protect the UK's domestic credit system and safeguard money markets that lubricate lending. It should use the skeletons of the old banks to build a healthier structure.
"The new banks will be more credible once they no longer have these liabilities on their back."
Mr Stiglitz said the City of London would survive the shock of such a default because it would uphold the principle of free market responsibility. "Counter-parties entered into voluntary agreements with the banks and they must accept the consequences," he said.
Such a drastic course of action would be fraught with difficulties and risks, however. It would leave healthy banks in an untenable position since they would have to compete for funds in the markets with state-run entities.
Mr Stiglitz's radical proposal is a "Chapter 11" scheme for households to allow them to bring their debts under control without having to go into bankruptcy. "Families matter just as much as firms. The US government can borrow at 1pc so why can't it lend directly to poor people for mortgages at 4pc. ," he said.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/4424418/Let-banks-fail-says-Nobel-economist-Joseph-Stiglitz.html
Monday 2 February 2009
How she owed more than her home was worth?
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished
by Laura Rowley
Posted on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 12:00AM
Eve Pidgeon, communications director for a nonprofit credit counseling service in Michigan, says she'll never forget the day she realized she owed more than her home was worth.
"I was at work, saying, 'Can you believe I can't refinance my house?'" recalls Pidgeon, who had made timely payments on her 30-year mortgage for nine years and has a credit score over 800. "Then a [colleague] said, ‘You're upside down -- like our clients.' I thought, ‘My God -- I am?' I thought that happened to people who had $50,000 on credit cards and refinanced into adjustable-rate mortgages."
A Canadian immigrant who became a U.S. citizen, Pidgeon bought her home in 1999. Her mortgage broker said she qualified for a $240,000 loan -- on her then-salary of $33,000 per year and her husband's volatile income as a freelance photographer.
Passing Up the Big, Fabulous House
"Calculations for insurance, escrow for property taxes -- none of that was considered," recalls Pidgeon, who has two children. "Of course we wanted a big, fabulous house, but when I crunched the numbers, I thought, 'If the cost of any one thing in our [budget] goes up, we're going to be in a deficit every month.' It put a lot of pressure on my marriage because my husband said, ‘You're terrible at math; this is a professional who knows what he's doing, and we should get this house.'"Instead they bought a quaint 1918 Victorian for $135,000. Pidgeon, who eventually divorced and navigated a job layoff without ever missing a mortgage payment or accumulating high-interest credit card debt, has refinanced twice -- from 8 percent to 6.8 percent, and then again to 6.3 percent, always locking in for 30 years. She wanted to refinance again when rates slipped under 5 percent, but widespread foreclosures have depressed her home's value; comparable dwellings are selling at or below the $117,000 she still owes.
Pidgeon is emblematic of the financial insecurity afflicting millions of Americans who are being punished despite doing all the right things with their money. Hard work, steady savings, and thoughtful sacrifices haven't protected their jobs, nest eggs, or home values from an economy twisted by fraud and stupidity, coldly indifferent to responsibility and productivity.
Homeowners Underwater
By one estimate, 12 million homeowners -- one in six -- are underwater on their mortgages. In 20 major metropolitan areas, home prices dropped an average 18 percent in November compared to the year-earlier period, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index, released earlier this week.
Unemployment rose in all 50 states in December and surpassed 10 percent in two -- Rhode Island and Pidgeon's home state of Michigan. Moreover, in the year following October 2007 -- the stock market's peak -- more than $1 trillion of stock held in 401(k)s and other defined-contribution plans evaporated, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
"The new insecurity doesn't look like the old insecurity -- grainy Dorthea Lange photos of Depression-era men and women, their weathered faces projecting despair and helplessness," writes Yale political scientist Jacob Hacker in his book ‘The Great Risk Shift'. "Those who experience it have homes, cars, families, degrees. They've usually tasted the fruits of success, if sometimes only fleetingly. They very rarely end up on the streets or in shelters. For most, insecurity is a private experience, hidden away behind closed doors, felt in quiet despair."
A Fair Question in Unfair Times
Consider a reader's comment last week following my column on the difference between optimism and magical thinking. The poster wrote that he was a computer programmer who had been employed for 25 years, worked hard, lived frugally, and was now laid off. His 401(k) had lost half its value and his home equity had declined sharply.
"Please tell me again why you believe I should be optimistic?" he wrote. "Is it that you expect folks (suckers) in my situation to get up, brush off, and once again toil to accumulate wealth that will be seized from me in one way or another?"
That's a fair question in unfair times. At the very least, we can mitigate the risks of having our hard-earned cash seized in the future by asking ourselves a series of questions:
1. Do you live within your means? How long could you live without your current income if you lost your job? Do you know exactly how much money comes in and where it goes each month? What areas of your budget could you slash immediately? What expenses can you cut back for the next year and reallocate toward a cash cushion?
2. If you consistently ratchet up your lifestyle to match rising income, can you divert half of any raise, bonus, or other increase you receive into savings instead?
3. Have you considered a strategy to obtain severance or other benefits in the event you're laid off? How up-to-date is your resume and network of contacts, and what would be the first five steps you would take to find a new position? Have you investigated your options for continuing or obtaining health insurance?
4. If you are living on two incomes, how can you shift your lifestyle and spending to rely on one for needs and the other for wants?
5. How well do your insurance policies protect you and the people you love? Have you shopped around for the lowest premiums?
6. If you carry high-interest, revolving debt, what is your plan for eliminating it, and how long will it take?
7. Do you have written goals -- short-, medium- and long-term -- for your money that reflect what you value most, with specific dollar amounts and time frames? Do you know how fast the cost of your goal is rising?
8. Do you understand how your money is invested, how much risk you're taking, and what expenses and fees you are paying? Do you understand the tax implications of your financial decisions (and your geographic choices)? If not, are you making an effort to learn about these critical areas of your portfolio?
9. Are you taking good care of your health to reduce the risk of financially devastating medical costs?10. Do you give as much energy to your family and friends as you do to your finances? (Losing your shirt is a lot more painful when you go through it alone.)
The Risks We Face
"Studies consistently suggest that we are good at some kinds of risk assessments and very bad at others," Hacker writes. "And unfortunately, the kinds of risks that we face today -- diffuse, interwoven, mounting, uncertain -- are precisely those we are most likely to overlook. Economic losses for families are often like system failures in engineering -- they cascade from seemingly small events into major crises. Yet few of us worry much about the small events that can set off the chain."
Pidgeon says she never imagined she'd be in her first home nearly a decade after she bought it, but she is focused on the positive. "If I could [refinance], I could gain a few hundred dollars in my monthly surplus and use it to stimulate the sagging local economy," she says. "But my priority was to move to the States and make the most of my education and my career, and raise a wonderful family in a safe, comfortable, and loving environment. Whether I'm paying 6.3 percent or 4.5 percent, I feel very proud that I accomplished that."
http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/moneyhappy/137398;_ylt=ArMJDpteaSKgQNT6eQGJXB27YWsA
by Laura Rowley
Posted on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 12:00AM
Eve Pidgeon, communications director for a nonprofit credit counseling service in Michigan, says she'll never forget the day she realized she owed more than her home was worth.
"I was at work, saying, 'Can you believe I can't refinance my house?'" recalls Pidgeon, who had made timely payments on her 30-year mortgage for nine years and has a credit score over 800. "Then a [colleague] said, ‘You're upside down -- like our clients.' I thought, ‘My God -- I am?' I thought that happened to people who had $50,000 on credit cards and refinanced into adjustable-rate mortgages."
A Canadian immigrant who became a U.S. citizen, Pidgeon bought her home in 1999. Her mortgage broker said she qualified for a $240,000 loan -- on her then-salary of $33,000 per year and her husband's volatile income as a freelance photographer.
Passing Up the Big, Fabulous House
"Calculations for insurance, escrow for property taxes -- none of that was considered," recalls Pidgeon, who has two children. "Of course we wanted a big, fabulous house, but when I crunched the numbers, I thought, 'If the cost of any one thing in our [budget] goes up, we're going to be in a deficit every month.' It put a lot of pressure on my marriage because my husband said, ‘You're terrible at math; this is a professional who knows what he's doing, and we should get this house.'"Instead they bought a quaint 1918 Victorian for $135,000. Pidgeon, who eventually divorced and navigated a job layoff without ever missing a mortgage payment or accumulating high-interest credit card debt, has refinanced twice -- from 8 percent to 6.8 percent, and then again to 6.3 percent, always locking in for 30 years. She wanted to refinance again when rates slipped under 5 percent, but widespread foreclosures have depressed her home's value; comparable dwellings are selling at or below the $117,000 she still owes.
Pidgeon is emblematic of the financial insecurity afflicting millions of Americans who are being punished despite doing all the right things with their money. Hard work, steady savings, and thoughtful sacrifices haven't protected their jobs, nest eggs, or home values from an economy twisted by fraud and stupidity, coldly indifferent to responsibility and productivity.
Homeowners Underwater
By one estimate, 12 million homeowners -- one in six -- are underwater on their mortgages. In 20 major metropolitan areas, home prices dropped an average 18 percent in November compared to the year-earlier period, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index, released earlier this week.
Unemployment rose in all 50 states in December and surpassed 10 percent in two -- Rhode Island and Pidgeon's home state of Michigan. Moreover, in the year following October 2007 -- the stock market's peak -- more than $1 trillion of stock held in 401(k)s and other defined-contribution plans evaporated, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
"The new insecurity doesn't look like the old insecurity -- grainy Dorthea Lange photos of Depression-era men and women, their weathered faces projecting despair and helplessness," writes Yale political scientist Jacob Hacker in his book ‘The Great Risk Shift'. "Those who experience it have homes, cars, families, degrees. They've usually tasted the fruits of success, if sometimes only fleetingly. They very rarely end up on the streets or in shelters. For most, insecurity is a private experience, hidden away behind closed doors, felt in quiet despair."
A Fair Question in Unfair Times
Consider a reader's comment last week following my column on the difference between optimism and magical thinking. The poster wrote that he was a computer programmer who had been employed for 25 years, worked hard, lived frugally, and was now laid off. His 401(k) had lost half its value and his home equity had declined sharply.
"Please tell me again why you believe I should be optimistic?" he wrote. "Is it that you expect folks (suckers) in my situation to get up, brush off, and once again toil to accumulate wealth that will be seized from me in one way or another?"
That's a fair question in unfair times. At the very least, we can mitigate the risks of having our hard-earned cash seized in the future by asking ourselves a series of questions:
1. Do you live within your means? How long could you live without your current income if you lost your job? Do you know exactly how much money comes in and where it goes each month? What areas of your budget could you slash immediately? What expenses can you cut back for the next year and reallocate toward a cash cushion?
2. If you consistently ratchet up your lifestyle to match rising income, can you divert half of any raise, bonus, or other increase you receive into savings instead?
3. Have you considered a strategy to obtain severance or other benefits in the event you're laid off? How up-to-date is your resume and network of contacts, and what would be the first five steps you would take to find a new position? Have you investigated your options for continuing or obtaining health insurance?
4. If you are living on two incomes, how can you shift your lifestyle and spending to rely on one for needs and the other for wants?
5. How well do your insurance policies protect you and the people you love? Have you shopped around for the lowest premiums?
6. If you carry high-interest, revolving debt, what is your plan for eliminating it, and how long will it take?
7. Do you have written goals -- short-, medium- and long-term -- for your money that reflect what you value most, with specific dollar amounts and time frames? Do you know how fast the cost of your goal is rising?
8. Do you understand how your money is invested, how much risk you're taking, and what expenses and fees you are paying? Do you understand the tax implications of your financial decisions (and your geographic choices)? If not, are you making an effort to learn about these critical areas of your portfolio?
9. Are you taking good care of your health to reduce the risk of financially devastating medical costs?10. Do you give as much energy to your family and friends as you do to your finances? (Losing your shirt is a lot more painful when you go through it alone.)
The Risks We Face
"Studies consistently suggest that we are good at some kinds of risk assessments and very bad at others," Hacker writes. "And unfortunately, the kinds of risks that we face today -- diffuse, interwoven, mounting, uncertain -- are precisely those we are most likely to overlook. Economic losses for families are often like system failures in engineering -- they cascade from seemingly small events into major crises. Yet few of us worry much about the small events that can set off the chain."
Pidgeon says she never imagined she'd be in her first home nearly a decade after she bought it, but she is focused on the positive. "If I could [refinance], I could gain a few hundred dollars in my monthly surplus and use it to stimulate the sagging local economy," she says. "But my priority was to move to the States and make the most of my education and my career, and raise a wonderful family in a safe, comfortable, and loving environment. Whether I'm paying 6.3 percent or 4.5 percent, I feel very proud that I accomplished that."
http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/moneyhappy/137398;_ylt=ArMJDpteaSKgQNT6eQGJXB27YWsA
How Wall Street Continues To Doom Itself
How Wall Street Continues To Doom Itself
Rick Newman
Friday January 30, 2009, 12:29 pm EST
We've arrived at an ah-ha moment.
Virtually everybody who butters their own bread is outraged that Wall Street, which is becoming a de facto government agency thanks to billions in bailout money, found $18.4 billion in bonuses for bankers who nearly wrecked the world's financial system in 2008. President Obama's criticism - "shameful" - is mild compared to what many of us think.
The bankers are bellyaching about a 44 percent decline in bonuses from 2007 levels. That's like complaining about being served a 40-ounce porterhouse instead of a 70-ounce one.
[See why "Wall Street talent" is an oxymoron.]
Here's a bit more perspective: Charles Payne, CEO of the research firm Wall Street Strategies, points out that in 1985, Wall Street bonuses totaled $1.9 billion. The average recipient got $13,970. Since 1985, inflation has run 97 percent in total, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That means that something worth $1 in 1985 would be worth $1.97 today. So follow the math:
Wall Street bonus pool in 1985: $1.9 billion
Value in 2008, if indexed for inflation: $3.75 billion
Actual 2008 bonus pool: $18.4 billion
Amount by which bonus pool exceeded inflation: 490 percent
Average Wall Street bonus, 1985: $13,970
Value in 2008, if indexed for inflation: $27,580
Actual average bonus, 2008: $112,000
Amount by which average bonus exceeded inflation: 406 percent
So pay for top Wall Streeters has risen 4 to 5 times as much as the rate of inflation since 1985. Of course those bankers are worth it, because of all the great things they've done for America during that time, like engineer the Long-Term Capital Management meltdown in 1998, the tech bubble that burst in 2001, the housing bubble that's still bursting, a credit freeze that's producing hypothermia at hundreds of real companies that actually make stuff, and the near collapse of the financial markets.
[See why it was a good move to let Lehman Brothers fail.]
If there's a crowning absurdity, it's that Wall Street mustered any bonuses at all in a year when the industry lost $34 billion. Does anybody else in America get a bonus when their company tanks? "Rewarding cataclysmic failure like this has to be what led to the fall of the Roman Empire," Payne wrote in a recent note to clients.
It's worth pointing out that not all Wall Street firms are as wayward as big offenders like Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, AIG, and Bank of America. Many made money in 2008, and any firm that isn't asking for taxpayer handouts should be allowed to pay its people whatever it wants.
[See five pieces missing from Obama's stimulus plan.]
But the bonus brouhaha reveals so many disconnects in the financial industry that it could end up being a pivotal moment in the dismantling of the old Wall Street. Derivatives and "funding facilities" are hard for most people to understand. But gimme gimme gimme is a corruption we all understand. If the politicians didn't have a clear rallying cry for going after Wall Street before, they sure do now.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/How-Wall-Street-Continues-To-usnews-14209399.html
Rick Newman
Friday January 30, 2009, 12:29 pm EST
We've arrived at an ah-ha moment.
Virtually everybody who butters their own bread is outraged that Wall Street, which is becoming a de facto government agency thanks to billions in bailout money, found $18.4 billion in bonuses for bankers who nearly wrecked the world's financial system in 2008. President Obama's criticism - "shameful" - is mild compared to what many of us think.
The bankers are bellyaching about a 44 percent decline in bonuses from 2007 levels. That's like complaining about being served a 40-ounce porterhouse instead of a 70-ounce one.
[See why "Wall Street talent" is an oxymoron.]
Here's a bit more perspective: Charles Payne, CEO of the research firm Wall Street Strategies, points out that in 1985, Wall Street bonuses totaled $1.9 billion. The average recipient got $13,970. Since 1985, inflation has run 97 percent in total, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That means that something worth $1 in 1985 would be worth $1.97 today. So follow the math:
Wall Street bonus pool in 1985: $1.9 billion
Value in 2008, if indexed for inflation: $3.75 billion
Actual 2008 bonus pool: $18.4 billion
Amount by which bonus pool exceeded inflation: 490 percent
Average Wall Street bonus, 1985: $13,970
Value in 2008, if indexed for inflation: $27,580
Actual average bonus, 2008: $112,000
Amount by which average bonus exceeded inflation: 406 percent
So pay for top Wall Streeters has risen 4 to 5 times as much as the rate of inflation since 1985. Of course those bankers are worth it, because of all the great things they've done for America during that time, like engineer the Long-Term Capital Management meltdown in 1998, the tech bubble that burst in 2001, the housing bubble that's still bursting, a credit freeze that's producing hypothermia at hundreds of real companies that actually make stuff, and the near collapse of the financial markets.
[See why it was a good move to let Lehman Brothers fail.]
If there's a crowning absurdity, it's that Wall Street mustered any bonuses at all in a year when the industry lost $34 billion. Does anybody else in America get a bonus when their company tanks? "Rewarding cataclysmic failure like this has to be what led to the fall of the Roman Empire," Payne wrote in a recent note to clients.
It's worth pointing out that not all Wall Street firms are as wayward as big offenders like Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, AIG, and Bank of America. Many made money in 2008, and any firm that isn't asking for taxpayer handouts should be allowed to pay its people whatever it wants.
[See five pieces missing from Obama's stimulus plan.]
But the bonus brouhaha reveals so many disconnects in the financial industry that it could end up being a pivotal moment in the dismantling of the old Wall Street. Derivatives and "funding facilities" are hard for most people to understand. But gimme gimme gimme is a corruption we all understand. If the politicians didn't have a clear rallying cry for going after Wall Street before, they sure do now.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/How-Wall-Street-Continues-To-usnews-14209399.html
Intervening to prop up pound is 'recipe for failure', says Brown
Intervening to prop up pound is 'recipe for failure', says Brown
PM expected to admit today that he should have been tougher with 'freewheeling bankers'
By Sean O'Grady, Jane Merrick and Brian BradySunday, 1 February 2009
'We do not target our exchange rate': Gordon Brown at the World Economic Forum in Davos yesterday
Related Articles
Leading article: An apology of an apology
John Rentoul: We all throw a tantrum once in a while
Hamish McRae: The recovery will be slow, difficult and unlike any we've known before
Davos: The real story
Investors urge Lloyds to sack Andy Hornby
Union urges Government to take utilities away from private equity and hedge funds
So hip, it hurts. Can Puma leave the recession for dead?
An army of altruists: VSO boosted by record rise in recruits
It's an ill wind... UK tourism finds recession is so bracing!
Margareta Pagano: Obama is the one to lead us out of this mess
Lenders cite squeeze on savers as they seek to limit mortgage cuts
Price falls open the door for first-time buyers
Editor-At-Large: Look who's worst off in recession – women, of course
Gordon Brown has indicated that he will not intervene to prevent the pound sinking still further against the dollar, the euro and other major currencies.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the Prime Minister suggested that the fate of sterling was a matter for the markets alone: "We do not target our exchange rate." That, he added, would be a "recipe for failure", as it had been when governments tried to "shadow the Deutschmark" and joined the European Exchange Rate Mechanism in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Mr Brown's comments seem certain to push sterling lower, and may see it hit parity with the euro.
At the same time, Caroline Flint, the Europe minister, appeared to rule out British entry into the single currency, even in the long term. She told The Independent on Sunday: "We are prepared to look at the issues around the euro. This doesn't mean, in principle, that we think we have a journey to the euro. It's about whether it would work for the British economy." Her remarks appeared to be at odds with the position of the Business Secretary, Lord Mandelson, who he said this month that joining the euro remained a long-term policy objective.
Mr Brown will today take some responsibility for failing to get tough with freewheeling banks when he was Chancellor – but he will stop short of a full apology for his role in the recession. "We're toughening up the regulatory system," he will tell BBC1's Politics Show, a move No 10 hopes will tackle claims that he refuses to accept any blame for Britain's plight. "That is an acceptance that it wasn't strong enough to meet what was, effectively... a global financial freezing up."
Market fears centre on the scale of the Government's debts now being piled up, and the possibility that the Treasury will have to take on trillions of pounds-worth of liabilities if the banking system continues to falter. Many liabilities are in foreign currency and large in relation to the UK's GDP, prompting comparison with Iceland, which in effect went bust because of its overextended banks. Economist Willem Buiter has joked about London becoming "Reykjavik-on-Thames".
There are also worries about the state of the economy, and the accumulating bad debts that will accumulate as the UK enters its worst recession in 60 years. The IMF last week forecast that the British economy would shrink by 2.8 per cent in 2009, its worst showing since the Second World War, although Bank of England and Treasury officials seem relaxed about the decline of the pound, in the hope this will boost exports, although there is little evidence of that so far.
Showing considerable irritation about remarks from international investors such as Jim Rogers, who have sold sterling and declared the UK "finished", the Prime Minister said: "We are not going to build our policies around self-interested speculators."
Mr Rogers said recently that he has sold all his sterling assets. And on Tuesday, the billionaire investor George Soros, who "broke the Bank of England" during the 1992 ERM crisis, said he too had been selling, sterling over the past 12 months: "Sterling did fall from around $2 to about $1.40 and at that level the risk-reward balance is no longer compelling. I'm not saying it won't fall any more though – it will continue to fluctuate." Against a basket of currencies, the pound has lost about a third of its value in a year.
There are also concerns in some European circles that the British Government is using the hefty depreciation in the pound against the euro as a sort of stealth protectionism. Mr Brown and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel have warned in Davos about the "retreat to protectionism".
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/intervening-to-prop-up-pound-is-recipe-for-failure-says-brown-1522528.html
PM expected to admit today that he should have been tougher with 'freewheeling bankers'
By Sean O'Grady, Jane Merrick and Brian BradySunday, 1 February 2009
'We do not target our exchange rate': Gordon Brown at the World Economic Forum in Davos yesterday
Related Articles
Leading article: An apology of an apology
John Rentoul: We all throw a tantrum once in a while
Hamish McRae: The recovery will be slow, difficult and unlike any we've known before
Davos: The real story
Investors urge Lloyds to sack Andy Hornby
Union urges Government to take utilities away from private equity and hedge funds
So hip, it hurts. Can Puma leave the recession for dead?
An army of altruists: VSO boosted by record rise in recruits
It's an ill wind... UK tourism finds recession is so bracing!
Margareta Pagano: Obama is the one to lead us out of this mess
Lenders cite squeeze on savers as they seek to limit mortgage cuts
Price falls open the door for first-time buyers
Editor-At-Large: Look who's worst off in recession – women, of course
Gordon Brown has indicated that he will not intervene to prevent the pound sinking still further against the dollar, the euro and other major currencies.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the Prime Minister suggested that the fate of sterling was a matter for the markets alone: "We do not target our exchange rate." That, he added, would be a "recipe for failure", as it had been when governments tried to "shadow the Deutschmark" and joined the European Exchange Rate Mechanism in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Mr Brown's comments seem certain to push sterling lower, and may see it hit parity with the euro.
At the same time, Caroline Flint, the Europe minister, appeared to rule out British entry into the single currency, even in the long term. She told The Independent on Sunday: "We are prepared to look at the issues around the euro. This doesn't mean, in principle, that we think we have a journey to the euro. It's about whether it would work for the British economy." Her remarks appeared to be at odds with the position of the Business Secretary, Lord Mandelson, who he said this month that joining the euro remained a long-term policy objective.
Mr Brown will today take some responsibility for failing to get tough with freewheeling banks when he was Chancellor – but he will stop short of a full apology for his role in the recession. "We're toughening up the regulatory system," he will tell BBC1's Politics Show, a move No 10 hopes will tackle claims that he refuses to accept any blame for Britain's plight. "That is an acceptance that it wasn't strong enough to meet what was, effectively... a global financial freezing up."
Market fears centre on the scale of the Government's debts now being piled up, and the possibility that the Treasury will have to take on trillions of pounds-worth of liabilities if the banking system continues to falter. Many liabilities are in foreign currency and large in relation to the UK's GDP, prompting comparison with Iceland, which in effect went bust because of its overextended banks. Economist Willem Buiter has joked about London becoming "Reykjavik-on-Thames".
There are also worries about the state of the economy, and the accumulating bad debts that will accumulate as the UK enters its worst recession in 60 years. The IMF last week forecast that the British economy would shrink by 2.8 per cent in 2009, its worst showing since the Second World War, although Bank of England and Treasury officials seem relaxed about the decline of the pound, in the hope this will boost exports, although there is little evidence of that so far.
Showing considerable irritation about remarks from international investors such as Jim Rogers, who have sold sterling and declared the UK "finished", the Prime Minister said: "We are not going to build our policies around self-interested speculators."
Mr Rogers said recently that he has sold all his sterling assets. And on Tuesday, the billionaire investor George Soros, who "broke the Bank of England" during the 1992 ERM crisis, said he too had been selling, sterling over the past 12 months: "Sterling did fall from around $2 to about $1.40 and at that level the risk-reward balance is no longer compelling. I'm not saying it won't fall any more though – it will continue to fluctuate." Against a basket of currencies, the pound has lost about a third of its value in a year.
There are also concerns in some European circles that the British Government is using the hefty depreciation in the pound against the euro as a sort of stealth protectionism. Mr Brown and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel have warned in Davos about the "retreat to protectionism".
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/intervening-to-prop-up-pound-is-recipe-for-failure-says-brown-1522528.html
Rio in talks with Chinalco over £10bn cash injection
Rio in talks with Chinalco over £10bn cash injection
$40bn debt forces miner to consider link-up with China's state-owned giant
By Nick ClarkMonday, 2 February 2009
Rio Tinto is preparing for further talks with China's state-owned mining giant Chinalco over a potential £10bn cash injection to ease its mountain of debts.
FTSE 100-listed Rio, which admitted for the first time last week that it could consider a rights issue, has held negotiations over a potential investment from the Chinese in recent weeks. The group hopes that a deal could be announced as early as its full-year results next week as the latest step in its programme to reduce debts of $40bn. The group has pledged to cut that by $10bn this year.
It is understood that the talks have gone beyond preliminary negotiations, but nothing has been finalised. Details are unclear, but beyond lifting its existing stake, Chinalco could be issued with a convertible bond by Rio. Chinalco could also be interested in taking on some of its mines or take minority positions in some of its more valuable assets.
Rio declined to comment yesterday.
Chinalco has enjoyed a close relationship with Rio since it bought an 11 per cent stake in the group in a dawn raid last February, and it was thought to be keen to up its stake. Rio's boss, Tom Albanese, is interested in teaming up with the Chinese over iron ore projects, and there was talk of the two companies developing infrastructure in Australia last year.
The group is trying to raise funds to cope with its debts. Rio is the most highly leveraged of the mining giants on the London Stock Exchange's blue-chip index. The brunt of the debt was brought on with the $38bn acquisition of the US aluminium group Alcan at the top of the market in 2007. It has to refinance $9bn of debt in October.
Rio launched its planned asset fire sale last week as it offloaded two mines to Brazilian rival Vale in a deal worth $1.6bn. It announced on Friday that it had agreed to sell its Potasio Rio Colorado project in Argentina, and the Corumba iron mine in Brazil. Yet the group has struggled to raise enough interest for its assets as credit remains scarce and potential sellers have failed to come up with adequate offers. Insiders have said it is even willing to listen to bids for its 30 per cent stake in Escondida, the world's largest copper mine.
As well as the sale of "non-core" assets, the company is looking to bolster its savings with a dramatic cost-cutting plan and curb on spending. It intends to cut 14,000 jobs and reduce capital expenditure by $5bn next year.
On Wednesday, for the first time, the group announced it could raise money from shareholders. "In order to preserve maximum flexibility for the group, the boards do not rule out the potential to issue equity as one of the options it has available," it said.
The sector has been hit by the falling demand for commodities, especially from China. Rio's share price had been buoyed in the wake of a hostile takeover attempt by BHP Billiton in 2007, which would have been one of the biggest deals in corporate history. The $58bn merger collapsed in November when BHP walked away, blaming the worsening economic conditions and the fall in commodity prices. The shares plunged and are 76 per cent off their peak in May.
Rival Xstrata announced it would turn to shareholders to raise $5.9bn in a heavily discounted rights issue, to pay down its debts and buy a coal mine. Xstrata has $16.3bn of debt, but it does not need refinancing until 2011.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/rio-in-talks-with-chinalco-over-16310bn-cash-injection-1523111.html
$40bn debt forces miner to consider link-up with China's state-owned giant
By Nick ClarkMonday, 2 February 2009
Rio Tinto is preparing for further talks with China's state-owned mining giant Chinalco over a potential £10bn cash injection to ease its mountain of debts.
FTSE 100-listed Rio, which admitted for the first time last week that it could consider a rights issue, has held negotiations over a potential investment from the Chinese in recent weeks. The group hopes that a deal could be announced as early as its full-year results next week as the latest step in its programme to reduce debts of $40bn. The group has pledged to cut that by $10bn this year.
It is understood that the talks have gone beyond preliminary negotiations, but nothing has been finalised. Details are unclear, but beyond lifting its existing stake, Chinalco could be issued with a convertible bond by Rio. Chinalco could also be interested in taking on some of its mines or take minority positions in some of its more valuable assets.
Rio declined to comment yesterday.
Chinalco has enjoyed a close relationship with Rio since it bought an 11 per cent stake in the group in a dawn raid last February, and it was thought to be keen to up its stake. Rio's boss, Tom Albanese, is interested in teaming up with the Chinese over iron ore projects, and there was talk of the two companies developing infrastructure in Australia last year.
The group is trying to raise funds to cope with its debts. Rio is the most highly leveraged of the mining giants on the London Stock Exchange's blue-chip index. The brunt of the debt was brought on with the $38bn acquisition of the US aluminium group Alcan at the top of the market in 2007. It has to refinance $9bn of debt in October.
Rio launched its planned asset fire sale last week as it offloaded two mines to Brazilian rival Vale in a deal worth $1.6bn. It announced on Friday that it had agreed to sell its Potasio Rio Colorado project in Argentina, and the Corumba iron mine in Brazil. Yet the group has struggled to raise enough interest for its assets as credit remains scarce and potential sellers have failed to come up with adequate offers. Insiders have said it is even willing to listen to bids for its 30 per cent stake in Escondida, the world's largest copper mine.
As well as the sale of "non-core" assets, the company is looking to bolster its savings with a dramatic cost-cutting plan and curb on spending. It intends to cut 14,000 jobs and reduce capital expenditure by $5bn next year.
On Wednesday, for the first time, the group announced it could raise money from shareholders. "In order to preserve maximum flexibility for the group, the boards do not rule out the potential to issue equity as one of the options it has available," it said.
The sector has been hit by the falling demand for commodities, especially from China. Rio's share price had been buoyed in the wake of a hostile takeover attempt by BHP Billiton in 2007, which would have been one of the biggest deals in corporate history. The $58bn merger collapsed in November when BHP walked away, blaming the worsening economic conditions and the fall in commodity prices. The shares plunged and are 76 per cent off their peak in May.
Rival Xstrata announced it would turn to shareholders to raise $5.9bn in a heavily discounted rights issue, to pay down its debts and buy a coal mine. Xstrata has $16.3bn of debt, but it does not need refinancing until 2011.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/rio-in-talks-with-chinalco-over-16310bn-cash-injection-1523111.html
House prices 'could fall 40 per cent without loan boost'
House prices 'could fall 40 per cent without loan boost'
By Sean Farrell, Financial EditorMonday, 2 February 2009
House prices could drop by a total of 40 per cent unless the Government steps in to boost lending, a report says today. The extreme scenario painted by the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) would see prices plunge by a record 25 per cent this year after last year's 16 per cent slide.
If the Government's banking bailout is able to boost mortgage approvals to 50,000 a month from the current level of about 32,000, the price fall from peak to trough could be limited to 32 per cent with values bottoming out in the first quarter of 2010, CEBR said. But without effective intervention to increase lending, the total fall would be 40 per cent with prices stagnating until 2012 and not getting above 2003 levels until the following year.
As part of a range of measures to get banks lending again, the Government intends to guarantee mortgage-backed securities to restart the market for securitisation – packaging up of loans for sale to investors. Securitisation provided £200bn of finance for banks in 2007 before the market was paralysed by fears stemming from the sub-prime crisis in the US.
The plan was recommended by Sir James Crosby, the former chief executive of HBOS, who predicted in November that, without action, net lending for house purchases could fall below zero as fewer loans are made than are paid off. Bank of England figures on Friday showed a rise in mortgage approvals to 31,000 in December from 27,000 a month earlier. The surprise increase followed data from the Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors that showed new buyer enquiries beginning to rise.
Halifax, the country's biggest mortgage lender, has pointed out that prices for first-time buyers are now more affordable than for years but potential buyers remain wary of further falls while banks are limiting their lending as bad debts rise.
Benjamin Williamson, an economist at CEBR, said: "The glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel for the beleaguered housing market is that prices and interest rates are now at levels whereby any improvement in lending is likely to lead to substantially increased activity and at the very least a bottoming out in house prices. However, if lending remains close to current very low levels, the spectre of the biggest annual drop in UK GDP since post-war demobilisation in 2009, with concomitant rises in unemployment and collapsing confidence, will likely lead to an acceleration in house price falls."
CEBR said that the crisis in the housing market lay at the heart of the credit crunch and that direct intervention to shore up the supply of mortgages would stimulate activity. The research unit added that a recovering housing market might play a part in a broader boost to consumer confidence that would help revive the economy.
Interesting? Click here to explore further
http://www.independent.co.uk/money/mortgages/house-prices-could-fall-40-per-cent-without-loan-boost-1523110.html
By Sean Farrell, Financial EditorMonday, 2 February 2009
House prices could drop by a total of 40 per cent unless the Government steps in to boost lending, a report says today. The extreme scenario painted by the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) would see prices plunge by a record 25 per cent this year after last year's 16 per cent slide.
If the Government's banking bailout is able to boost mortgage approvals to 50,000 a month from the current level of about 32,000, the price fall from peak to trough could be limited to 32 per cent with values bottoming out in the first quarter of 2010, CEBR said. But without effective intervention to increase lending, the total fall would be 40 per cent with prices stagnating until 2012 and not getting above 2003 levels until the following year.
As part of a range of measures to get banks lending again, the Government intends to guarantee mortgage-backed securities to restart the market for securitisation – packaging up of loans for sale to investors. Securitisation provided £200bn of finance for banks in 2007 before the market was paralysed by fears stemming from the sub-prime crisis in the US.
The plan was recommended by Sir James Crosby, the former chief executive of HBOS, who predicted in November that, without action, net lending for house purchases could fall below zero as fewer loans are made than are paid off. Bank of England figures on Friday showed a rise in mortgage approvals to 31,000 in December from 27,000 a month earlier. The surprise increase followed data from the Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors that showed new buyer enquiries beginning to rise.
Halifax, the country's biggest mortgage lender, has pointed out that prices for first-time buyers are now more affordable than for years but potential buyers remain wary of further falls while banks are limiting their lending as bad debts rise.
Benjamin Williamson, an economist at CEBR, said: "The glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel for the beleaguered housing market is that prices and interest rates are now at levels whereby any improvement in lending is likely to lead to substantially increased activity and at the very least a bottoming out in house prices. However, if lending remains close to current very low levels, the spectre of the biggest annual drop in UK GDP since post-war demobilisation in 2009, with concomitant rises in unemployment and collapsing confidence, will likely lead to an acceleration in house price falls."
CEBR said that the crisis in the housing market lay at the heart of the credit crunch and that direct intervention to shore up the supply of mortgages would stimulate activity. The research unit added that a recovering housing market might play a part in a broader boost to consumer confidence that would help revive the economy.
Interesting? Click here to explore further
http://www.independent.co.uk/money/mortgages/house-prices-could-fall-40-per-cent-without-loan-boost-1523110.html
Russia and China Blame Crisis on Debt Binge
Russia and China Blame Crisis on Debt Binge
Topics:Stock Market Banking European Central Bank Credit Economy (U.S.) Economy (Global)
By: Reuters 29 Jan 2009 02:20 AM ET
China and Russia blamed debt-fueled consumption on Wednesday for massive financial collapse and called for global cooperation to repair the world economy.
"The existing financial system has failed," Putin told business and political leaders holding their annual World Economic Forum in this Swiss ski resort.
Growth was based on greed where one center printed money without respite and consumed wealth, and another manufactured cheap goods and saved money, he said.
His clear swipe at the United States was echoed by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who said the bad macroeconomic policies and unsustainable growth models of some countries "characterized by prolonged low savings and high consumption" were primary reasons for the crisis.
Wen also blamed the "blind pursuit of profit."
Despite the criticism of Western policies, both China and Russia pledged their support for open markets, refuted protectionism and called for the Group of 20 major economies to work swiftly toward a global regulatory system that would put world markets and financial institutions on a safer footing.
Certainly government solutions are in the driver's seat at meetings of business leaders and politicians in the Swiss mountain resort, a reversal from the usual gathering where Wall Street tycoons rule.
European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet joined the call for profound reforms to drag the economy back to health and said the G20, whose leaders hold a summit in April, was doing "good work" on policies.
"Everybody can see the present system is too fragile, and we have to reintroduce an element of resilience ... and we need to do that without any consideration of any kind of vested interest," he told Reuters Television.
Grim Mood
Crisis-hit bankers are thin on the ground at the meeting, and the few who did express concerns that governments would stretch too far on the regulatory front and stifle growth got scant hearing. They were promptly reminded that governments are bailing many of them out.
The mood among business people was grim. The International Monetary Fund forecast the world economy would slow to a near standstill this year, warning that deflation risks were rising.
A poll by PricewaterhouseCoopers of more than 1,100 CEOs found that just 21 percent of CEOs said they were very confident of growing revenue in the next 12 months, down from 50 percent a year ago.
Most business leaders said they expected no more than a slow and gradual recovery over the next three years.
RELATED LINKS
Current DateTime: 02:00:32 02 Feb 2009LinksList Documentid: 28901357
Stocks Could Drop 20%, No Safe Haven: Dr. Doom
Soros: 'Bad Bank' for Troubled Assets Is Bad Idea
Economic Crisis Brings New Set of Hazards: CEOs
Putin calls financial crisis a 'perfect storm'
"There are no silver bullets. My sense is 18 to 24 months of a very tough economic environment," Maria Ramos, chief executive of Transnet, South Africa's rail and logistics company, told Reuters.
Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley's Asia chairman, agreed it would be "a long slog" over the next three years.
"Forty percent of the world's wealth was destroyed in the last five quarters. It is an almost incomprehensible number," said Stephen Schwarzman, chairman of the leading private equity company Blackstone Group. "Business will be very different."
Currency Row
Before Wen's speech, a row intensified over Beijing's exchange rate policy after new U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner branded China a currency manipulator last week, using a term the previous administration avoided for years.
A Chinese diplomat said Washington had enough evidence to know China does not manipulate its exchange rate.
"I don't think it's fair all of a sudden to change the position of the U.S. government," the diplomat said in London, one of the European capitals Wen will visit after Davos.
Wen did not address the row directly in his speech, although his comment on the low savings rate was an indirect reminder that China is financing the United States.
Slideshow: Who's Who in Davos
He expects China to post 8 percent growth this year -- not much different from 2008 but down from 13 percent in 2007. The China slowdown coupled with recession in the major developed economies has pushed the global economy into severe recession.
That grim scenario has left sovereign fund Dubai International Capital wary of making big long-term investments even though it sees asset prices at reasonable levels.
"We're still very nervous about making some big bets -- we see the financial crisis getting worse. There's not going to be a magic wand solution to the problem," Chief Executive Sameer al-Ansari told Reuters.
Copyright 2009 Reuters.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28901277
Topics:Stock Market Banking European Central Bank Credit Economy (U.S.) Economy (Global)
By: Reuters 29 Jan 2009 02:20 AM ET
China and Russia blamed debt-fueled consumption on Wednesday for massive financial collapse and called for global cooperation to repair the world economy.
"The existing financial system has failed," Putin told business and political leaders holding their annual World Economic Forum in this Swiss ski resort.
Growth was based on greed where one center printed money without respite and consumed wealth, and another manufactured cheap goods and saved money, he said.
His clear swipe at the United States was echoed by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who said the bad macroeconomic policies and unsustainable growth models of some countries "characterized by prolonged low savings and high consumption" were primary reasons for the crisis.
Wen also blamed the "blind pursuit of profit."
Despite the criticism of Western policies, both China and Russia pledged their support for open markets, refuted protectionism and called for the Group of 20 major economies to work swiftly toward a global regulatory system that would put world markets and financial institutions on a safer footing.
Certainly government solutions are in the driver's seat at meetings of business leaders and politicians in the Swiss mountain resort, a reversal from the usual gathering where Wall Street tycoons rule.
European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet joined the call for profound reforms to drag the economy back to health and said the G20, whose leaders hold a summit in April, was doing "good work" on policies.
"Everybody can see the present system is too fragile, and we have to reintroduce an element of resilience ... and we need to do that without any consideration of any kind of vested interest," he told Reuters Television.
Grim Mood
Crisis-hit bankers are thin on the ground at the meeting, and the few who did express concerns that governments would stretch too far on the regulatory front and stifle growth got scant hearing. They were promptly reminded that governments are bailing many of them out.
The mood among business people was grim. The International Monetary Fund forecast the world economy would slow to a near standstill this year, warning that deflation risks were rising.
A poll by PricewaterhouseCoopers of more than 1,100 CEOs found that just 21 percent of CEOs said they were very confident of growing revenue in the next 12 months, down from 50 percent a year ago.
Most business leaders said they expected no more than a slow and gradual recovery over the next three years.
RELATED LINKS
Current DateTime: 02:00:32 02 Feb 2009LinksList Documentid: 28901357
Stocks Could Drop 20%, No Safe Haven: Dr. Doom
Soros: 'Bad Bank' for Troubled Assets Is Bad Idea
Economic Crisis Brings New Set of Hazards: CEOs
Putin calls financial crisis a 'perfect storm'
"There are no silver bullets. My sense is 18 to 24 months of a very tough economic environment," Maria Ramos, chief executive of Transnet, South Africa's rail and logistics company, told Reuters.
Stephen Roach, Morgan Stanley's Asia chairman, agreed it would be "a long slog" over the next three years.
"Forty percent of the world's wealth was destroyed in the last five quarters. It is an almost incomprehensible number," said Stephen Schwarzman, chairman of the leading private equity company Blackstone Group. "Business will be very different."
Currency Row
Before Wen's speech, a row intensified over Beijing's exchange rate policy after new U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner branded China a currency manipulator last week, using a term the previous administration avoided for years.
A Chinese diplomat said Washington had enough evidence to know China does not manipulate its exchange rate.
"I don't think it's fair all of a sudden to change the position of the U.S. government," the diplomat said in London, one of the European capitals Wen will visit after Davos.
Wen did not address the row directly in his speech, although his comment on the low savings rate was an indirect reminder that China is financing the United States.
Slideshow: Who's Who in Davos
He expects China to post 8 percent growth this year -- not much different from 2008 but down from 13 percent in 2007. The China slowdown coupled with recession in the major developed economies has pushed the global economy into severe recession.
That grim scenario has left sovereign fund Dubai International Capital wary of making big long-term investments even though it sees asset prices at reasonable levels.
"We're still very nervous about making some big bets -- we see the financial crisis getting worse. There's not going to be a magic wand solution to the problem," Chief Executive Sameer al-Ansari told Reuters.
Copyright 2009 Reuters.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/28901277
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)