Tuesday 16 March 2010

A lot of investment behaviour is based on irrational decision-making, driven by emotion rather than logic. Behavioural finance is now playing an increasing role in investment decision-making.


From The Times
March 13, 2010

Investment masterclass: fight against your instinct to make a profit

You can boost stock market returns by avoiding typical behaviour patterns


Since the 1960s one grand theory has dominated investors’ views of how stock markets work. The efficient market hypothesis asserts that prices accurately reflect available information and investors behave rationally. It’s an elegant idea and leads to the conclusion that it is not generally possible to beat the market except through luck or inside information.
However, it doesn’t accurately reflect the world at all times, Therefore, it can be argued that it is not particularly useful for the poor investor trying to get a handle on markets. Which is why, over recent years, a second theory has been grabbing attention. This theory, called behavioural finance, accepts that markets are not always rational but it rejects the idea that they are completely random. Although behavioural finance initially was treated with scepticism in the City, it is now playing an increasing role in investment decision-making. Bringing insights from psychology to the world of finance, it asserts that a lot of investment behaviour is based on irrational decision-making, driven by emotion rather than logic. By understanding how average investors behave and the mistakes they make, you can learn how to avoid them.
James Montier, strategist at GMO and author of The Little Book of Behavioural Investing: How Not to Be Your Own Worst Enemy, says: “Our brains have been refined by the process of evolution, just like any other feature of our existence. But remember, evolution occurs at a glacial pace, so our brains are well designed for the environment that we faced 150,000 years ago, but potentially poorly suited for the industrial age of 300 years ago, and perhaps even more ill-suited for the information age in which we now live.”
This means that investors consistently make mistakes that damage returns. Here are some of the most common and how to learn to avoid them.

The narrative fallacy
Investors are easily won over by positive stories. Even when news is bad the predominant view is that things will get better. This encourages investors to favour companies that have done well in the past, even if they are expensive and can create bubble conditions.
Forcing yourself to focus on the facts should make you a better investor.
Overconfidence
When investors have a run of good luck they become more confident in their abilities. A study by the University of California academics Terrance Odean and Brad Barber found that if investors have a good run on the stock market, they often take higher risks, trading more actively and usually less profitably. In gambling circles this is known as the “house money” effect. People are more likely to bet recklessly with money that they have won than money they brought into the casino.
The best way to overcome this is to stick to an investment discipline. If you have had a good run and feel like putting more money into the market, take a step back.
Following forecasts
Mr Montier claims that experts are often more overconfident than the rest of us, yet we tend to follow authority blindly. Even though experience tells us that many forecasts are wrong, we cling to them because of a trait known as anchoring. In the face of uncertainty, we reach out for any irrelevant number as support. It is best to ignore the experts and their forecasts.
Information overload
People often believe that to beat the market they need to know more than everyone else. However, studies shows that excess information can lead to overconfidence, not accuracy, as it makes it difficult to distinguish noise from news.
Mr Montier says: “We would be far better off analysing the five things we really need to know about an investment, rather than trying to know absolutely everything about everything concerned with the investment.”
Denial
Investors give more weight to information that appeals to them. Learn to look for evidence that proves that your own analysis is wrong.
Loss aversion
Studies show that we are about three times more likely to sell a stock that has performed well than one that has done badly. We hang on to investments that have lost us money, even if the evidence suggests that they have farther to fall, because we cannot cope with the regret of having made a bad decision. To overcome this, set yourself a buy and sell target and keep to it.
Groupthink
It is hard to go against the crowd, which is why investors tend to follow the herd and buy the latest hot stocks and funds. You can turn this to your advantage by picking stocks that are cheap and out of fashion. But be warned: this strategy takes courage.
Focusing on outcomes
Mr Montier says: “When every decision is measured on outcomes, investors are likely to avoid uncertainty, chase noise and herd with the consensus.”
Instead, he argues, investors should focus on the process by which they invest: “The management of return is impossible, the management of risk is illusory, but process is the one thing we can exert an influence over.”
Leave the herd behind and get ahead
One of the key tenets of behavioural finance is that investors follow the herd, although chasing the latest fad often ends in disaster.
In the late 1990s, tech funds were all the rage and investors poured billions into them on the back of a run of stunning performances. After the tech bubble burst in 2000 many lost 90 per cent of their value.
Commercial property funds were the runaway bestsellers of 2006 . But this rush of money proved to be the last hurrah in an already overinflated sector.
So which funds have been selling like hotcakes recently? Bond funds were one of the big success stories of 2009, attracting £9.9 billion of net retail sales, according to the Investment Management Association, and investors who took the plunge were rewarded. Standard corporate bond funds produced returns averaging 14.6 per cent last year, while those investing in riskier high-yield bonds returned 46.4 per cent. However, many fund managers warn that any investor expecting a repeat of this performance in 2010 will be disappointed. More recently property funds have been the top-selling sector, with net retail sales of £373 million in January.
So if you want to try to overcome your herd instincts, what should you be investing in now? Alan Steel, of Alan Steel Asset Management, says: “The contrarian would shun property investments and gilts in favour of equities.
“Even though stock markets have soared in the past 12 months, sentiment is still very depressed about the future prospects of both equities and the global economy. Buying shares is still a contrarian stance.”

Coke to invest RM1b in Malaysia


Coke to invest RM1b in Malaysia

UPDATED
By Lee Wei Lian
NILAI, March 16 — Global beverage company Coca-Cola plans to invest more than RM1 billion in Malaysia over the next five years including the construction of a new bottling facility in Nilai.
The investments are expected to cover both marketing and manufacturing.
The new plant in Nilai will cover 123,024 square metres and will employ between 600 and 800 workers. It is also expected to create between 6,000 and 8,000 jobs with local suppliers.
“This RM1 billion investment represents the Coca-Cola system’s strong commitment to Malaysia and its consumers in delivering refreshing beverage choices, creating job opportunities and helping in building a better community,” said Glenn Jordan, president of the Pacific Group of The Coca-Cola Company at the ground-breaking ceremony of the new plant here today.
Jordan said the investment is the largest incremental investment it has made in the country.
He added that more than 90 per cent of the raw materials required would be sourced locally.
“This will enable us to produce the wide variety of beverages under the ‘non-alcoholic ready to drink’ category in which The Coca-Cola Company is a leader in terms of sales, innovation and marketing... in Malaysia as well as globally,” said Jordan.
The new facility will also practise rainwater harvesting and meets the Silver Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED), the first Coca-Cola plant in Southeast Asia to achieve this standard.
The opening of the plant was officiated by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, who said he met Coca-Cola in Singapore last year and encouraged it to invest in the Nilai plant.
“I am happy to see that in just four months, the plant has become a reality,” he said in his speech at the ground-breaking ceremony.
“I believe in associating Malaysia with one of the world’s most recognised brands. Malaysia will benefit from Coca-Cola’s presence and vote of confidence. I hope it will be a shining example for others to follow.”
Coca-Cola has been in Malaysia since 1936. Its brands include Diet Coke, Sprite and Minute Maid.

Taking Profit and Reducing Serious Loss

Taking profit

Profit should be realised from sales of stocks in the following situations:
(I) when the stock is obviously overpriced, or
(II) when the sale of the stock frees the capital to be reinvested into another stock with potentially better return.



  • Not taking profit in the above situations can harm your portfolio and compromise its returns. 
  • In other circumstances, let the winners run.

Underperforming stocks should also be sold early.
  • Hanging onto underperforming stocks is costly too. 
  • There is the opportunity cost that the capital can be better employed for higher return. 
  • Also, hanging onto these lack-lustre stocks reduces the overall return of your portfolio.





Reducing serious loss

When the fundamentals of a stock have deteriorated, sell to protect your portfolio. 


  • This decision should be make quickly based on the facts and situations, in order to keep your losses small.







How can you improve your investment returns in stocks?

Through Understanding the Power of Compounding, ANYONE can become rich if they start an investment plan EARLY in life.

It is not so much the increase in future value (FV) over the early 10-year periods of the savings plan, but the increase over the final 10-year period that yields the big bucks.

For instance, if we reference the compounding at 10 percent, 


  • FV increased by $41,338 between years 10 and 20, 
  • while the increase between years 40 and 50 was $721,316.
Thereafter, if you start your investment plan at age 30 rather than 20, the $1,000 a year you spent before that rather than invested will have cost you $721,316.

The greatest deterrent to an investment plan is not so much the fortitude to put aside a small percentage of income, but the willpower not to steal from the fund until your regular employment income ceases. Anyone can become rich if they start an investment plan early in life.


http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2008/11/understanding-power-of-compounding.html




Slow and consistent accumulation through the power of compounding. 


Investing is not about making a quick kill, but slow and consistent accumulation through the power of compounding. 


Sometimes, exceptional results will occur through 

  • the catch-up process of buying underpriced stocks or 
  • excessive market pricing
but unless you really know what you are doing, never gamble on chasing quick returns by being enticed to buy on margin.

Most individuals trading in highly leveraged futures are eventually wiped out by their lack of staying power when exceptional price volatility extinguishes their small percentage of equity. 


  • Losing a bet in which you can be 100 percent right with your choice but 1 percent wrong with the timing doesn't seem very good odds. 
  • Making money is nice, but peace of mind is much more valuable.
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2008/11/slow-consistent-accumulation-through.html


Also read:
1.  Uncle Chua's Portfolio & Dividend Income
Here is Uncle Chua's portfolio & dividend income, reproduced here as accurately as was depicted in the book:  http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=r5DhwS2nWTiIAK0pDCIPD-Q

2.  The Story of Anne Scheiber
http://www.horizon.my/2008/11/the-story-of-anne-scheiber/
Maxwell recounts the story of Anne Scheiber, an elderly and thrifty lady who lived in New York and worked for the Inland Revenue Service. When Scheiber retired at age fifty-one, she was only making $3,150 a year. She was treated poorly by her employer and was never promoted. Yet when Anne Scheiber died in 1995 at the age of 101, it was discovered that she left an estate to Yeshiva University worth US$22 million!
How did a public service worker with minimal salary accumulate such a staggering wealth?



3.  *****Long term investing based on Buy and Hold works for Selected Stocks
It sure beats FD rates and it is safe too.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tWENexpUrXS_RMxB7k73RgQ&output=html



The important lesson here is to realize the power of regular investment and compound returns. When you invest in good things and you invest regularly, your wealth will eventually multiply.

The Bull Market that followed the 1956-1957 Bear Market

bearmarket-57.jpg

bearmarket-overview.jpg


http://www.businessinsider.com/bear-market-1956-1957

Monday 15 March 2010

Buy in haste, repent at leisure


Buy in haste, repent at leisure

2010/03/15
MEERA MURUGESAN
Before buying any property, seek professional consultation, advises MEERA MURUGESAN
TWO years ago, Anita and Jeff came across an advertisement. A double-storey terrace house was for sale. It was in a location they had planned to live in and the price was within their budget.

They had found their dream home, or so they thought.

Being first-time house buyers, the couple were eager to land the property.

A month after moving in, Jeff and Anita realised they had made a mistake.

The house had been advertised as “move-in condition” but the couple soon found themselves forking out huge sums for repairs.

“We had endless internal plumbing problems and had to redo wiring for the entire house. We are paying so much for repairs because something gets broken all the time,” Anita says. In their eagerness to secure the property, they failed to notice the hidden costs that would incur from the purchase.

“The previous owner had painted the place and patched things up to make it look presentable so we failed to notice just how bad the condition of the place really was,” says Jeff.

For Farah, a single executive from Petaling Jaya, her dream of owning a condominium has ended in frustration.

She signed up to purchase a yet-to-be built condominium from a developer during a home owner’s campaign in 1999.

She liked the location of the condominium, the facilities promised and the fact that the developer seemed reputable. She was confident of getting ownership of the property by 2002.
Chang advises buyers to appoint
their own lawyers
Chang advises buyers to appoint their own lawyers
Unfortunately, for Farah, the developer went bankrupt in 2001 and till today, there has been no news of the project being revived.

“I paid close to RM10,000 to complete the initial transactions. I’m still servicing my loan for the property but I don’t have a home," says a disgruntled Farah.

Despite frequent meetings with the developer’s representatives and even lodging a complaint with authorities, Farah and other affected house buyers are no closer to seeing their dream become a reality.

“The developer has been asking buyers to fork out more money to revive the project. Yet they can’t give any assurance on when the project will be completed," Farah says.

The cases above are classic examples of challenges faced by house buyers in Malaysia and the common mistakes some first-time purchasers make, says Chang Kim Loong, honorary secretary-general of the National House Buyers Association (HBA).

Chang says for many people, the purchase of a house or apartment is the most important financial decision of their lives. Unfortunately, one wrong move can result in a lifetime of problems.

As in Anita and Jeff’s case, many people pay for a house and discover defects later which cost them thousands to repair.

Chang explains that this would not have happened if the couple had hired a professional, such as an independent building inspector or quality consultant to report on the condition of the house and check for permitted renovations against shoddy renovations before they made the purchase.

In fact, the report would have given them additional room for negotiation with the seller.

In America and Canada, home inspections are standard practice in the purchasing process.

Home inspectors conduct inspections of newly-built or previously owned homes.

Another mistake that many house buyers make is failing to appoint their own lawyer before starting any transaction with the present owner of the property.

“The first rule of conveyancing is that the buyer must engage his own lawyer and consult a lawyer right from the start, and not after you have paid the deposit,” Chang says. In most cases, a lawyer would be able to complete the transaction.

However, lawyers with a focused real estate practice may prove a better tool if the buyer is unsure of what to do or if there are complications in the purchase agreement or mortgage.

“While you may think you cannot afford the services of your own lawyer, consider whether you can afford not to,” cautions Chang.

A lawyer ensures that his client’s rights and interests are protected and that his client is aware of the rights, risk and responsibilities before signing an agreement.

They also ensure that negotiations lead to a fair agreement binding each party to the contract with no uncertainties.
Chang says a lawyer should not be representing both parties in the sale. If, for example, the buyer decides to use the seller’s lawyer, when disputes happen, that lawyer is unlikely to represent him against his client.

When purchasing a home from a developer, many house buyers are also easily taken in by phrases such as “free legal fees” in the developer’s brochure.

Chang says in these type of transactions, the developer recommends a lawyer to the buyer to attend to the sale contract and the developer pays the lawyer’s fees.



The buyer is given the impression that if he uses this recommended lawyer, he gets things done free.

In reality, the recommended lawyer has a conflict of interest. He or she is on the developer’s panel and would be receiving work from current or future projects from the developer.

“How can such a lawyer act impartially for the buyer if problems arise later such as delay in delivery of vacant possession or shoddy workmanship? That’s why it’s always advisable for each party to appoint its own lawyer,” says Chang.

When purchasing from a developer, many people also make the mistake of assuming that a developer’s property is a guaranteed investment or that the property will be completed and delivered with vacant possession and a certificate of completion and compliance. In fact, Chang says, consumers must first understand the difference between a “Sell-Then-Build” (STB) or “Build-Then-Sell” (BTS) variant property. Understanding the difference could save a lot of heartache and financial loss.

STB means buyers will finance the building of the property in progressive stages. It’s like buying a car and paying for it progressively.

“For example, when the car doors are fixed, 10 per cent is paid, when the tyres are fixed, another 10 per cent is paid, when the engine is installed, 15 per cent is paid and so on,” Chang says.

On the other hand, a BTS property means the developer substantially finances the building of the property. It means buyers will pay only after the whole “car” is completed and delivered in good working order, with the authorities’ approval. Chang says if the STB property is not completed, buyers are stuck in the sale contract with huge amounts of money already paid to the developer.

But if the BTS property is not completed, buyers can opt to break away from the contract with relatively smaller losses.

The HBA has always advocated the BTS concept as it has been tried and tested successfully in neighbouring countries and prevents buyers from being burdened with problems such as shoddy workmanship or abandoned projects.

“It is a more straightforward and secure deal for buyers,” says Chang. Auction properties also come across as very attractive to many prospective buyers because of the lower pricing but consumers may not realise the hidden dangers involved.

As the auction properties are sold on an “as is where is” basis, this means new buyers assume responsibilities for whatever encumbrances or outstanding debts on the property.

Chang says the property may also have many problems such as broken water pipes or old electrical wiring that buyers usually discover only after taking possession.

Buyers must bear in mind that there is little chance of any physical inspection of the property prior to purchase and delivery of vacant possession is also not guaranteed.

HBA has Meet the Public Sessions on Saturdays from 1pm- 5pm at its Advice Centre in Jalan Imbi, Kuala Lumpur. For more information, visit www.hba.org.my.

China shipping fasteners to Europe via M’sia to avoid duty


Monday March 15, 2010

China shipping fasteners to Europe via M’sia to avoid duty

By DAVID TAN



GEORGE TOWN: Domestic mild-steel (or carbon-steel) fastener manufacturers are facing intense competition in Europe from China-made mild-steel fasteners shipped via Malaysia to avoid an anti-dumping duty imposed by the European Union (EU).
China-made fasteners have been slapped with an anti-dumping duty rate of an average 87.3% imposed by the EU since February 2009.
Chin Well Holdings Bhd senior manager Richard Yeap Soon Thong told StarBiz that since then, the selling price of Chin Well’s mild-steel fasteners in Europe had to be lowered by at least 20% to compete against China-made fasteners.
“This eats into our profit margin. Otherwise, we could have marked up our pricing by 20% to 30% per tonne. The competition from Chinese fasteners has pressured Chin Well to lower its selling price of fasteners per tonne to RM4,000 and RM5,000,” he said.
Richard Yeap Soon Thong
Some local and foreign manufacturing companies are providing re-packing services for China-made fasteners and shipping them out with their generalised system of preferences (GSP) and made-in-Malaysia certificate of origin documents which enable them to enter Europe with respective duties of 1.2% and 3.7%.
“The profit to be obtained from such re-packing and shipping services is high, about 7% of the invoice for each shipment of container, which is about US$20,000 or about RM80,000.
“In the country presently, there are only six major steel fastener producers, of which four specialises in manufacturing mild-steel fasteners, producing collectively 4,000 tonnes to 5,000 tonnes of fasteners monthly.
“Since China was hit by the anti-dumping duty from EU, Malaysia’s monthly export of fasteners to the EU has increased substantially by about four to five times.
“This is the feedback we got from our distributors and wholesalers in Europe,” Yeap said.
In 2009 Malaysia exported 99,000 tonnes of all types of fasteners, comprising screws, bolts, nuts, coach screws, screw hooks, rivets, and cotter-pins, compared to 55,000 tonnes in 2008, according to data obtained from the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Miti).
“We have informed and updated Miti on the matter, lest Malaysia is also slapped with anti-dumping duty from the EU. The Miti office from Penang has recently informed us that they are working with the EU Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the port authorities, and the customs to check the abuse,” he added.
ED Fastening Sdn Bhd managing director T.W. Teh said as a result of of the situation, the company had suffered a sizable loss of market share in Europe.
“Our revenue for 2009, due to price competition and loss of market share in Europe, has dropped to about RM5mil, otherwise the it could easily be 50% more,” he said, adding that Europe generated about 35% of the company’s revenue.
The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) customs unit head, David Murphy, said in an on-line news report on Feb 9 that millions of euros worth of China-made goods were being fraudulently passed off as Malaysian-made by using the Port Klang Free Zone trans-shipment hub, where imported Chinese goods were transferred to another container and re-exported using the invoice of a Malaysian company.
“Some firms also use false documents to obtain certificate of origin, which declares that the goods are of Malaysian origin. OLAF is working closely with Miti to tackle the problem that also exists at other major trans-shipment hubs such as the Jebel Ali free zone in Dubai and Singapore,” Murphy said.
He added that the real risk to Malaysia was that commercial action might be taken by the EU against Malaysian companies, thereby affecting legitimate manufacturers.
When contacted, Miti, in a statement, said the ministry was scrutinising the applications for the export of fasteners to the EU.
“All exporters were required to provide additional documentation including letter of indemnity from the exporter for non involvement in transhipment or import-export activity using GSP form A in the Free Trade and Industrial Zone.
“The ministry also carried out on-site verification visits to the fasteners’ manufacturers premises to verify their capability and capacity of producing fasteners for export market.
“We are also work closely with other Malaysian authorities such as customs, port authorities, and free zone authorities to ensure there is no transhipment of fasteners from China,” it said.
The Miti statement also noted that “in a statement dated Feb 9, OLAF said it was highly satisfied with the cooperation from Miti and other government authorities relating to the evasion of anti-dumping duties.”
Malaysian Iron and Steel Industry Federation (Misif) president, Chow Chong Long, acknowledges the occurance of such transhipment cases due to the liberalisation of trade.
“We have tried in the past to obtain the monthly figures of steel products coming in and going out of the country from the Department of Statistics Malaysia. The figures would help us detect whether there is excess of steel products being brought in and leaving the country given our present capacity and allow us to follow up with the Government to take timely and appropriate action.
Chow added that “the Government should look into ways on how it can get Misif access quickly the latest data on the export and import of steel products into Malaysia.”
“The problem is that the Department of Statistics Malaysia is always three months late with its data,” he said.
The Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers’ northern region chairman, Datuk O.K. Lee, said Malaysian manufacturers should tap into their capabilities to produce high-value added products to compete against China-made goods and not resort to providing such re-packing and transhipment services that could undermine the country’s image.

Understanding The Stock Market


Understanding The Stock Market


The stock market is where the shares in companies are bought and sold, providing

  • companies options to access capital, and 
  • investors opportunities to own a share of the company and enjoy potential gains from the company’s future performance.



The stock market offers people the ability to generate a separate income stream apart from their daily jobs, or income streams which are superior to those from traditional savings deposits. But before you even think about buying and selling shares, you must know the fundamentals of the stock market and of trading.

First time investors can become confused because of the terminology that is used to describe various market functions. These don’t take long to learn. Click here for your basic share trading terms. Incidentally, one common confusion is over the terms ‘ stocks’ and ‘shares’. Actually, they both mean the same thing and can be used interchangeably.

The Role of Bursa Malaysia


You can only invest in stocks through a stock exchange, an organized marketplace where stocks are bought and sold under strict rules, regulations and guidelines. The Malaysian stock exchange is called Bursa Malaysia. Bursa Malaysia has over 1,000 listed companies offering a wide range of investment choices to local and global investors. Companies are either listed on Bursa Malaysia Securities Main Market or ACE Market.


Raising Capital on the Stock Market


The Stock Market was created by companies wishing to raise capital for their business. When someone says they have a listed company they mean listed on Bursa Malaysia. All companies need cash to take advantage of growth opportunities. Many start-up companies however find themselves short of capital to fund expansion. One way to acquire this cash is to publicly float the company. This involves selling part of the company to private individual and institutional investors who are then able to freely exchange these stocks on an open market. Purchasing stocks in a company that is listed on the stock market is done through an Initial Public Offering or IPO.

Once an IPO has been issued, you can contact the company (phone, fax or email) for a copy of the Prospectus and complete the application to apply for an allocation of shares. Or you can wait until the company is floated and buy shares on the open market. Besides Bursa Malaysia, stock brokers will also have information regarding Initial Public Offerings.

Companies that are already listed can also raise additional money on the stock market by offering existing stockholders the opportunity to buy more stocks in the company. For example, a listed company wanting to raise additional capital might issue one new share at 5sen each for every three shares an existing investor owns.

When you buy shares, you are buying a share in that company and so you own a percentage of that company. When the company makes a profit, you share in that profit in the form of a dividend. Typically, the number of shares that have been issued multiplied by the share price gives us how much a company is worth.


http://edividend.bursamalaysia.com/website/bm/bursa_basics/investing_basics/understanding.html

Mid-Week Comment March 10: Asian REITs outperform

Mid-Week Comment March 10: Asian REITs outperform

WRITTEN BY GOOLA WARDEN
THURSDAY, 11 MARCH 2010 10:08


SO FAR, Asian stock markets have been going nowhere this year. Year-on-year though, the STI has almost doubled, the S&P500 is up 69%, and the FTSE All-World Index up 75% in US$ terms. Not surprising then that after such a performance, markets are taking a breather.

It is also not surprising that analysts are now recommending REITs over developers as investors shift their attention to yield. That is not to say that REITs have underperformed stocks. In a recent report, Ernst & Young points out that Asian REITs as a group have outperformed in terms of total returns. Singapore and Hong Kong REITs posted 85.6% and 64.5% returns respectively in 2009 with Malaysia (38.6%) and South Korea (28.4%) also performing strongly. Returns for Japan’s REITs grew just 6.68%, with Australia’s REITs performing slightly better at 10.4% growth in returns in the same full-year period. The largest single REIT market in the world, the United States, witnessed almost 28% returns.

In a report dated March 8, DBS Group Research points out that Singapore’s property sector is becoming increasingly segmented because of government policy. The recent measures are aimed at keeping public housing affordable.

“The policy road ahead is likely to remain focused on the mass-end of the housing market,” the report states. “We believe these rule changes were widely anticipated, given the frequent allusions by key political figures in recent months, on the need to address issues of affordability and social cohesion in the public housing arena,” says DBS. “This is likely to filter up to greater pricing resistance in the mass-end private housing segment, in line with our call to place bets on the high-end developers instead.” Its favourite plays in the property market are Ho Bee Investment and Wheelock Properties because of their focus on the high-end, and diversified players such as Capitaland and United Overseas Land.

DBS also prefers REITs such as CDL Hospitality Trusts, Ascott Residence Trust and CapitaMall Trust to developers.

CHART VIEW: BLUE CHIPS COULD DRIVE STI HIGHER
This week, the STI (2,862) has managed to move above its 50-day moving average at 2,812. The 21-day RSI has broken above a resistance and its equilibrium line, indicating that near term, prices are set to rise. Quarterly momentum is turning up from its equilibrium line, and the DIs have turned positive. Resistance stays at the 2,900-2,913 range. Volume has picked up a trifle, but remains below the levels when the market peaked in January.

Instinctively, if the STI attempts to break out, it will do it with the help of index stocks. The stronger ones are Sembcorp Marine, Sembcorp Industries, Neptune Orient Lines, the Jardine group of companies, Singapore Airlines and Singapore Telecommunications. SIA ($15.94) has moved up by $1 since the start of the month, and has been an important contributor to the STI’s strength. Technically, it is emerging from a bull flag, and looks set to move above $16. But, after such a strong surge, a pull-back should not be unexpected.

Singtel ($3.15), on the other hand, peaked last July, and has been entrenched within a trading range for the past six months. If it breaks out — and indicators are strengthening — it could well re-test the $3.50 level. That in turn would trigger the STI’s own break above 2,900, indicating a new upside target.

http://www.theedgesingapore.com/blog-heads/goola-warden/13373-mid-week-comment-march-10-asian-reits-outperform.html

India’s Fortis Healthcare to acquire 24% stake in Parkway Holdings for $959m


India’s Fortis Healthcare to acquire 24% stake in Parkway Holdings for $959m

WRITTEN BY THE EDGE
THURSDAY, 11 MARCH 2010 18:28

Fortis Healthcare, India’s fastest-growing healthcare company, has announced the acquisition of a 23.9% strategic stake in healthcare service provider Parkway Holdings from TPG Capital (formerly Texas Pacific Group).

Parkway has a network of 16 hospitals having 3,400 beds spread over six countries, including India. The deal size is estimated to be about US$685.3 million ($959.4 million).

Fortis has entered into a definitive agreement with TPG Capital, one of the world’s leading private investment firms, to acquire its 23.9% stake in Parkway.

Fortis intends to seek four seats on the board of directors of Parkway and also to nominate Malvinder Mohan Singh (current Chairman of Fortis Healthcare) as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Parkway.

http://www.theedgesingapore.com/the-daily-edge/business/13410-indias-fortis-healthcare-to-acquire-24-stake-in-parkway-holdings-for-959m.html

Though risky, one of the advantages of the stock market is that it can be used for various purposes.


Stock Market Strategy



What do you know about the stock market business? Do you find yourself accounted enough with the information related to the stock market to start gambling? In the case, you are, we might only give you our congratulations and wish good luck and nice profit there. However, if you find it would be important for you to account yourself with some interesting facts related the stock market business we might be helpful for you. Any way, we consider it is significant to understand the fact that disproves some unauthentic information.

People all over the world are talking about the great risk that we are under when we involve our assets into the stock market gambling. There were gossips that people all over the world lost huge amounts of money in the stock exchange business. It means that the people who have heard this resist involve money at the stock market. To be honest, the great deal of potential investors keeps their assets in the bank account thinking that it is the most safety place for them. Moreover, we would not dispute as for the fact that the stock market business is the risky one. Nevertheless, you should remember the fact that your bank account would never bring as much money as the stock market might do.

Any way, you should also be well accounted with the information that the lost as well as wins at the stock market gambling depends on the proper organization the speculations. What might you do for it? The only thing that depends on you is to make the proper investment. In the other words, you should observe and discover all possible information that characterizes the stock exchange you are going to deal with.

Whatever, you think it would be of great value for you to account yourself with the portfolio of the definite stock market. The portfolio of the stock exchange, you are going to deal with as the any other portfolio, includes all needed information that might be helpful for you to make the final decision. Nevertheless, there are the plenty of additional particularities of the stock market, which are common for the every single stock exchange. We are talking about the stability, dividends, visibility and the international exposure of the definite stock exchange. However, you might take into consideration the fact that relate the education and experience of brokers that are gambling at the very stock exchange before you would invest your money in it.

Frankly speaking, the brokers are the person directly responsible for the profit and benefit of the stock market. The only broker might deal with the speculations at the stock exchange and make you win or lose additional funds.

One of the advantages of the stock market is that it can be used for various purposes. Even the people who are involved into retirement investing consider the investments into the stock market activity to be a great investment tool.



http://usabestloans.com/finance/stock-market-strategy-11/

What is the first thing you think of when considering how to pass on your wealth?






Inheritance

When a young successful professional from telecom background lost his life in an accident leaving behind his wife (home-maker ) and three children between four and 10 years of age, apart from the severe emotional shock, the family went through immense trauma since the deceased had not put in place any succession plan.

While, the man had left behind substantial wealth, enough to secure their financial future, the family still needed to grapple with multiple challenges—how to consolidate scattered assets? Who will manage the assets for the children until they reach the age of majority? How to ensure that inheritance is not squandered away but is protected for the family’s long-term benefit?

So, what is the first thing you think of when considering how to pass on your wealth? For most Indians, it’s probably a Will. Of course, that is the most traditional method but is it the right choice for you? What are the alternatives? And what are the advantages and disadvantages? Let’s consider the various options. The succession planning tools most often favoured in India are the Will, Personal Holding Company (PHC) and Trust. Apart from these, options such as life insurance and setting up a foundation are also used internationally.




Will and Probate

Where does a Will rank among all these choices? You should look at it as being the minimum measure you need to take. A Will is a legal document that describes how your assets should be distributed in the event of your death. 

However, the actual distribution is controlled by a lengthy legal process called Probate. Derived from the Latin meaning to “prove the Will,” Probate can be cumbersome, time-consuming , in certain cases expensive and emotionally traumatic during a family’s time of grief and vulnerability.

A further drawback is that your assets not only have to be made available for public inspection but they are also frozen and cannot be utilised, pending Probate.




Revocable Living Trust

Given the disadvantages of a Will and considering how important a well thought-out succession plan is, you should also evaluate other options. For instance, an increasingly popular alternative among those with substantial wealth is a “Living Trust” . Living Trust is often called a Revocable Living Trust. 

As the name suggests, it can be revoked or amended by the person creating it (settlor) at any time while the settlor is still alive and remains competent. Importantly, when you set up a Living Trust, it manages and administers your wealth both during your lifetime as well as beyond. In other words, there’s no need whatsoever for Probate from the courts since your assets continue to be held within the Trust. Eliminating the Probate formality implies that your family privacy is maintained and administration procedures are minimised so no extensive time lag and no additional costs.

Going back to the above case, had the gentleman formed a Trust, his family would have at least been absolved of the nightmare of collating the scattered assets and the accompanying administration. While there are many benefits to be derived from a Living Trust, there are also a few drawbacks. Though most of these are minor and should not discourage you, it helps to be completely informed of the disadvantages so that you can structure it appropriately.



Living Trust



Since a Living Trust does not come under direct court supervision, a trustee who fails to act in the best interests of your beneficiaries may, in some cases, be able to take personal advantage. In addition, the cost of preparing a Living Trust could, in some cases, be higher than the cost of preparing a Will.

However, this depends on the particular estate plan and the difference in cost may not be significant if the estate plan is complex. Refinancing, especially of property held in a Living Trust, can be slightly difficult, though it is not impossible and is more of a minor complication that can slow things down.

Perhaps the most important decision for you to consider in a Living Trust is your choice of trustee to act in your place. The trustee may be your spouse, adult child, other relatives, family friends, business associates or a professional fiduciary, such as a bank or trust company. Whoever you decide, it should be someone who will follow through on your wishes in an impartial manner and without compromise so that your wealth legacy endures for generations to come.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/quickiearticleshow/5681798.cms

An appraiser’s approach in determining his opinion of value for a privately owned company.



Art and science


guest commentary by David Potts
This commentary, admittedly, is somewhat clinical, but it is important if you want to understand how to increase the value of your business, our theme for the next few weeks. Today we will outline an appraiser’s approach in determining his opinion of value for a privately owned company.

Valuing a business is both art and science. 

  • It is science in that an appraiser uses mathematical formulas and tried and true methods in appraising a business' value. 
  • It is art in that it takes judgment and experience to apply these formulas and methods correctly. 
  • An appraiser also has to be a bit of a fortuneteller because the value of a company is determined by the future economic benefits derived from owning the business. 
  • The past is used only as a guide to the future.


So where does a business appraiser start his analysis. 

  • First he must know the date for which the company is to be valued. 
  • Observations of the values of stocks on the New York Stock Exchange demonstrate that the value of a company changes through time based on market forces. 
  • This is true for both publicly traded companies and privately owned companies. 
  • So a static date must be determined.


Next, the definition of value must be determined. 

  • We will limit our discussion to fair market value as defined by the Internal Revenue Service in Revenue Ruling 59-60 which states the fair market value of an item of property is "the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell, and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts." 
  • From the appraiser's point of view the willing buyer and willing seller are hypothetical people. They are the people that make up the “market.” 
  • It's the appraiser’s challenge to interpret the market. 
  • People who buy and sell business interests are the market makers.


An appraiser considers three approaches in his analysis to determine a company's fair market value. These approaches are referred to as

  • the market approach, 
  • the income approach, and 
  • the asset approach. 
There are different methods under each of these approaches, so think of an approach as the underlying principles or theory supporting the method.

The market approach is simple to understand — deceptively simple. 

  • Anybody who's ever bought or sold a house understands how the market approach works. If you want to know the value of a house you want to buy or sell, you compare it to a house that is already sold to arrive at your opinion of value. It works the same way for a business. 
  • The idea behind the market approach is that the fair market value of the business can be determined by reference to a guideline company for which the value is known. It is just a lot easier to compare houses than businesses. 
  • However once you have determined that you have found a comparable company, you simply take a multiple of the price to a parameter of the comparable company and apply it to the subject company to determine its value. 
  • The parameter on which the multiple is based is normally something such as sales, earnings, or book value — e.g. price to earnings or the PE ration.



The asset approach indicates the value of the business by determining the fair market value of its assets and subtracting its liabilities. 

  • From the appraiser's point of view assets include balance sheet assets and off balance sheet assets, tangible assets as well as intangible assets. 
  • Liabilities include income tax on the unrealized gains between the fair market value of the assets and their income tax basis. 
  • Because of the difficulty of valuing intangible assets such as goodwill and the expense of appraising individual assets, is generally more feasible to use the market approach or the income approach to value an operating company.




The income approach is based on the time value of money, the risk of the investment, and the expected rate of inflation. 

  • The three primary valuation methods based on the income approach are the discounted cash flow method, the capitalized cash flow method, and the excess cash flow method. 
  • These methods are based on determining a future benefit stream, generally cash flow. I'll discuss these methods in more depth in the future. 
  • Just keep in mind that the value of a business indicated by the income approach is (restated a bit differently than above) based on the cash flow a business can generate, the growth rate of the business, and the discount rate. 
  • The discount rate reflects the rate of return required to attract buyer’s to a business with its level of perceived risk.


An appraiser may use one or all three approaches in arriving at his opinion in the value of a privately owned company. 

  • If he uses more than one approach he must reconcile the different values reached using the different approaches. 
  • Adjustments also may have to be made to recognize other ownership characteristics — e.g., whether the interest being valued is a control interest or a minority interest and/or whether there are restrictions on the transfer of an ownership interest. Many things can affect the value of the company. 
In future commentaries we will discuss ways to increase the value of your company in less clinical terms. But an understanding of the valuation approaches discussed above will give our discussions context and structure to understand why choices you make in your business can increase your business’ value and your wealth.

David Potts is a certified public accountant also accredited in business valuation. Owner of Potts & Company, Certified Public Accountants for more than 25 years, his practice focuses on small and medium size businesses and their owners in the areas of taxation, accounting and bookkeeping, business valuation and business advisory services. He is a Fort Smith native and a graduate of the University of Arkansas. You can follow more of his thoughts atThePottsReport.com. Although every effort is made to provide you accurate and timely tax information, it is general in nature and not specific to your facts and circumstances. Consult a qualified tax professional to discuss your particular case.


http://www.thecitywire.com/index.php?q=node/8963

Getting the right balance, vibrancy and diversity

Saturday March 13, 2010

Getting the right balance, vibrancy and diversity


WHO are the investors that we should be targeting?
Yusli: I think we need to have a good balance. At some point for the past few years, a third of our stock market investors was foreign, a third was local retail, and a third local institutions, and that was quite a good balance.
But today, more than 50% of our stock market investors are local institutions. That, to me, has gone a bit too far to one side. We need to bring the balanced equation back.
Besides a good mix of foreign and local investors, we also need to have a good mix of investors with different strategies – short-term and long-term.


There’s excess liquidity in the banking system, but these are not going into the capital market, even though some of the big caps do offer better returns compared with fixed deposits. So, maybe we should be targeting domestic funds – retail and institutional – to invest in our own market?

Yusli: Bursa Malaysia is working closely with the participating organisations such as brokers and remisiers to tap into retail money. Increasingly, we are now seeing more domestic retail investors trading through the Internet, which is in line with the global trend.
On top of that, I hope there will be further liberalisation in terms of licensing for retail sector to bring about more competition that will result in more products being offered to Malaysian retail investors. I think Malaysian consumers deserve to have a full range of products and services that consumers in other parts of the world are getting.

Most of our retail investors are not that sophisticated. So, maybe we need to provide them with some form of protection, especially when the market is subject to manipulation, among others. What’s your opinion?

Yusli: We take these issues very seriously. Investor protection and corporate governance issues are very high on our priority list. We have a special team that constantly monitors all the trading activities in the market, and we’re quick to query the companies when we suspect some unusual market activities.

Could the lack of interest in the local market be due to the lack of good quality, investable companies around?

Cheah: Well, there are many good-quality companies in the country. Some of them are not listed, but for some of those listed ones, you can hardly see any action. They are very solid, but they just want to remain quiet and stay in the comfort zone, perhaps because they are family-controlled and are not interested to do anything else. So there are very few corporate exercises.
Chin: There are some good companies around, but some of these stocks are just not “monetisable” for the broker to justify covering because their trading volume is too low. For the brokers, a counter has to trade above a certain level (that is, at least US$1mil a day for CLSA) for it to be monetisable and worthy of our time and resources.
Yusli: Some companies are a good deal, while some may have business models that are more volatile. But just as we need different traders to play our market, we also need to have a variety of companies to cater to their varying appetite, and this could create market vibrancy.
I think that’s just what’s missing today. There’s no vibrancy in our market. We need to create vibrancy because that will bring in more liquidity.
I’d like to see more corporate activities such as major IPOs and mergers and acquisitions because these will create interest and attract attention to the market.
And as part of our effort to create market vibrancy, Bursa Malaysia has already put in place the infrastructure, including direct market access or DMA, for investors to engage in more sophisticated form of trade such as shorting, but we don’t see people using them very much.
The problem is many of our investors seem to be very comfortable doing just plain vanilla trading, while the whole world has gone sophisticated with facilities like dark pools and multilateral trading facilities.

Does having foreign listings help promote vibrancy in our market?

Yusli: At the moment, we have only a handful of foreign listings in our market. Over time, we’ll have more.
Foreign listings provide diversity, especially for Malaysians who are reluctant to trade overseas, the opportunity to invest in a foreign company. But foreign listings are still a new thing for most Malaysian, so there are still some reservation over trading in those stocks.

The perception is that not-so-good companies are being listed here because they can’t get listed elsewhere.

Cheah: I think Malaysians are just not familiar with these foreign listings. Singapore, for instance, also went through a tough initial period when they wanted to introduce listings of China-based companies.
Here, we check on the companies before they are listed, and the SC also interviewed them to ensure that they are good companies. I believe the market will gradually get used to it.
Yusli: As you’ve seen, one of these foreign companies has actually produced very good results. Again, go back to the fundamentals, and the fundamentals of these foreign listings are indeed strong. Our investment bankers have done their due diligence. They are not going to bring bad companies to list here.