Tuesday 26 October 2010

10 shares for dividends



Investors had something to cheer about, with news that dividend payments are rising again.


Ship in Miami, Carnival to scrap fuel surcharges
Carnival controls about 60pc of the cruise market
In the third quarter of this year (July to September), the dividends paid by British companies rose 1.6pc, the first rise since early 2009, according to the latest report by Capita Registrars.
Perhaps surprisingly, the biggest growth came from smaller and medium-sized companies. Dividends paid by FTSE 250 companies grew by a third, far faster than the growth in payments by the larger companies that dominate the FTSE 100. These payments actually fell 2pc in the last quarter, although these figures were skewed by BP's decision to cancel its dividend payout completely following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
Amid more general economic pessimism, fund managers say this information shows that many British companies are in rude health. Clive Beagles, equity income manager at J O Hambro, said: "We remain optimistic that this trend will continue."
The companies starting or reinstating dividend payments to shareholders outnumber by three to one those that cut or cancelled their dividends.
But not all equity income managers are as bullish. Bill Mott, the veteran income manager who now runs Psigma Income, remains "fairly cautious" about the outlook for UK companies.
"I think we are in for a few years of fairly anaemic growth. The companies best placed to pay dividends will be stable, predictable businesses that do not have to spend a lot of money maintaining or growing their market position," he said. He said these tended to be companies that are already in the dividend arena such as pharmaceutical, telecoms, tobacco and utility companies.
But both fund managers agree that for smart investors there are opportunities for significant dividend growth outside these established stalwarts. Below is a list of companies tipped by various fund managers to deliver strong dividend growth over the next few years.
Of course, those not wanting to risk investing in individual shares should consider an equity income fund, which invests in a broad basket of companies that have the potential to pay a good dividend stream.

DEBENHAMS

Mr Beagles said this high street retailer had certainly had its problems. It stopped paying dividends two years ago, but since then has managed to reduce the debt it is carrying by about two-thirds.
On the back of more optimistic trading statements he said he is optimistic that these payments should resume next year. "If it only paid out a third of its earnings, this would mean a dividend of about 9 to 10p. On current share prices that would represent a yield of about 4.5pc," he said.

CARNIVAL CRUISES

This is another smaller company that Mr Beagles said had the potential to deliver strong dividend growth. The company, which bought P & O Princess at the start of the previous decade, controls about 60pc of the cruise market. It has expanded over the past decade, but again two years ago it cut its dividends right back as customer demand dropped in the wake of the financial crisis. It is now paying a small dividend but this is just a quarter of what it paid before payments were scaled back.
Mr Beagles said: "The company has spent less on new ships, and demand is growing again, so its cash flow position has improved. We would expect to see this translate into a growing dividend stream again."
Investors should bear in mind that, as this company has a dual listing in Britain and America, dividends are paid in US cents.

BP

Most analysts expect the oil giant to reinstate its dividend payments in 2011. The question is, at what level. Tineke Frikkee, a fund manager at Newton Investments, said: "Optimists might be hoping that payments will resume at its previous level, of about US 14c per quarter, while the most pessimistic commentators reckon shareholders will be lucky to get half this."
Ms Frikkee said she sat "somewhere between the two" and expected a dividend payment of between 9c and 10c next year. However, although this will show a big jump in dividend payments, the yields may not be as high as other companies'.
She added that fluctuations in the pound to dollar exchange rate could affect returns for British investors.

TESCO (AND SAINSBURY'S AND MORRISONS)

Mr Mott said those looking for good dividends and consistent growth should look at these food retailers. Yields currently range from just under 3pc to just over 4pc. "Each of these are good defensive companies," he said.
"And are looking to expand in various ways, both in the UK, thanks to our growing population, and overseas." He added: "They are cash generative businesses, with potential for good dividend growth, but they remain a low risk investment, particularly if economic conditions worsen."

BOOKER

This cash-and-carry business is also favoured by Mr Mott for future dividend growth. He said: "They have a very good chief executive in Charles Wilson, who has turned the company around from having massive debt to virtually no debt at all."
The business is involved in a start-up venture in India, but also has the stable cash flow from its UK base. He added: "This company has the potential to grow its earnings and its dividend. And on today's share price this yield looks attractive."

L & G

Many life insurers, like other financial companies, scaled back their dividend payments at the start of the credit crisis, but many are now increasing these payments again, on the back of good growth.
Legal & General, for example, halved its dividend at the end of 2008, from almost 6p to 3p. Its last dividend was up 30pc; "But even with this rise there is still considerable scope for further rises to reach their previous levels," said Mr Beagles. Other life insurers are also edging up dividend payments: Aviva, for example, recently grew its dividend by 10pc‑15pc.

CAPE

This industrial services company (which is involved in the safety and maintenance of oil rigs, among other things) has not paid a dividend for 10 years. This has been largely due to it carrying significant debts and having a substantial historical asbestos liability.
But the company has managed to reduce its debts, and has made provision for outstanding asbestos claims. Mr Beagles said: "We expect this company to start behaving as it should have done for the past decade, as a well run £400m company that trades on a reasonable price to earnings ratio."

HSBC

Analysts expect HSBC to be the bank that provides the biggest dividend growth in 2011. Ms Frikkee said: "Investors must remember again though that this is paid in dollars."
Although bank balance sheets are improving, political and regulatory consideration could impair their ability to return to dividend yields seen in the past. Ms Frikkee said that, looking to the long term, Lloyds Banking Group looked a good bet to provide a steady and consistent dividend stream, but it is unlikely to start paying shareholders over the next year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/8085698/10-shares-for-dividends.html

Goldman investment to make Warren Buffett $1.5bn – in just two years

Warren Buffett's reputation as one of the world's canniest investors looks set to receive its latest boost as the 'Sage of Omaha' prepares to generate a $1.5bn (£956m) profit by selling his stake in Goldman Sachs.


Goldman investment makes Warren Buffett $1.5bn ? in just two years
Goldman investment makes Warren Buffett $1.5bn ? in just two years
The US investment bank is close to paying back the $5bn Mr Buffett invested in Goldman at the height of the financial crisis in 2008.
Berkshire Hathaway, Mr Buffett's investment company, has already received $1bn in annual dividend payments from Goldman and is now set to scoop a further $500m buyout premium when the loan is repaid. The payments mean the annual return on the two-year investment will be 12.5pc.
The precise timing of the buyback has yet to be decided and Goldman declined to comment on its plans.
Mr Buffett's investment was made in September 2008, just days after Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, and was seen as a major vote of confidence in Goldman at a time when the market was concerned that it could be close to collapse.
Under new US capital rules, Berkshire Hathaway's $5bn of preference shares will no longer contribute to Goldman's loss buffer and a bank source said it was now seen as "expensive" funding.










http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/8079106/Goldman-investment-to-make-Warren-Buffett-1.5bn-in-just-two-years.html

Write your will – before it's too late



No one wants to think about what might happen to their dependants after they die, which is why so many of us put off making a will.




Last will and testament
A badly worded will could lead to relatives being saddled with massive legal fees
It is National Write a Will week this week, and 30 million people in Britain don't have a will – about 70 per cent of the population – according to unbiased.co.uk, the financial advisers' website.
Even if your affairs are simple, you do need to spell out what you want to happen to your assets. "If you die without, you leave your dependants at the mercy of the intestacy rules," warns William Marriott, of solicitor Meadows Fraser. "The rules don't always work the way you would expect them to."
As well as making life easier for your dependants, making a will can help reduce the tax payable.
So what should you put in a will and what will happen if you don't have one?

IF I DIE INTESTATE, WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO WHAT I OWN?

If you die intestate, which means without making a will, your assets will be distributed according to the law, and not according to your wishes. Jill Dando and Stieg Larsson, the author of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, are among those who have died without leaving a will and whose estates were inherited by their fathers, not their partners.
In England and Wales, if you are married with children, you might assume that all of your assets would go to your spouse. However, if your estate is worth more than £250,000, your partner will only get the first £250,000. They will get a life interest in half of the remaining estate, which means they can't get rid of it or spend it, but they are entitled to the interest.
The remainder will go to the children. If your assets are worth less than £250,000, your children will get nothing.
If you are not married or in a civil partnership, your partner won't inherit under the intestacy rules. Similarly, if you have separated but not divorced, your ex-partner will inherit the first £250,000 of your estate.
If you are childless and single, various family members could take varying shares of your estate. If no one claims it, the Government will take the lot.

THAT'S NOT GREAT. HOW DO I GO ABOUT GETTING A WILL?

You can make your own will, as long as you get it witnessed and have all of the formal requirements within it. If your circumstances are fairly simple, you could consider using a will-writing kit, which is available from stationers. However, a will that is badly worded could lead to relatives being saddled with massive legal fees.
It is possible to use online services where your will would be checked by a professional. For a full will, which will help your family to avoid tax and trauma after you die, it's best to talk to a solicitor. Using a firm regulated by the Law Society (www.lawsociety.org.uk) will mean that you deal with a qualified person, and also that you have some consumer protection.
Will-writers, on the other hand, are cheaper, but not regulated.

WHAT ISSUES SHOULD I CONSIDER WHEN I MAKE A WILL?

Do everything you can to make sure that your wishes are not contested. Make sure you do not ask any of the beneficiaries of your will to help draft it. Older people may ask grown-up children to help them write a will, but this means the will could be challenged by other potential beneficiaries. Make sure your will is properly signed and witnessed by two people who are not beneficiaries.
You will need to decide who your executors are. These are the people who will administer your will. You can pay for a bank or solicitor to do this, or a friend can offer to do it for free. If you have young children, you will need to appoint guardians to look after them if you were to die.

WHAT ABOUT TAX PLANNING?

Inheritance tax is 40 per cent, but it is known as the "voluntary tax" because it is relatively easy to get out of paying it with proper planning. Anyone who dies with total assets of more than £325,000 could leave their family with a tax liability. But if you leave your assets to your spouse or civil partner, no tax is payable. If you want to avoid tax and leave money to your children, seek legal advice about setting up a discretionary trust.

HOW MUCH SHOULD IT COST?

To save money, check if your employer, union or home insurer offers a free or discounted solicitor will-writing service. More Than insurance's £20 legal "add-on" to its home insurance policy offers a service where they will check a will for you. If you are on a low income, aged over 70, disabled, or you have a disabled child, www.communitylegaladvice.org.uk may be able to help you.
November is Will Aid month, when more than 1,000 solicitors will draft wills in exchange for a charitable donation. Expect to pay a voluntary £75 per single person and £110 per couple. Visit www.willaid.org.uk.

WHERE DO I KEEP MY WILL?

If a solicitor has made the will, they will usually store it, or you can pay an annual charge to have it stored at a bank. You can keep it yourself, but this is not the safest option.

HOW OFTEN SHOULD I REVIEW IT?

If you get married, divorced or have a child, make sure your will reflects this. Ensure that it is properly changed – either with an official change called a codicil if the change is minor, or by making a new will. Either way, make sure the changes are witnessed.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/consumertips/8087048/Write-your-will-before-its-too-late.html

Happiness the key to success

October 25, 2010

Being happy doesn't just make you feel good, it can also make you more successful, according to a Harvard University lecturer.

Shawn Achor, whose book The Happiness Advantage will be published in Australia next month, says, positive thinkers have a biological advantage over people who are are neutral or negative.

The good news is that being happy is a skill we can all learn, Achor says.

Here are some tips from his book on how to retrain your brain to capitalise on positivity and improve your productivity and performance.

- Meditate - research shows that regular meditation can permanently rewire the brain to raise levels of happiness, lower stress and even improve immune function.

- Find something to look forward to - often the most enjoyable part of an activity is the anticipation. If you can't take time out for a holiday now or a night out with friends, put something on the calendar. Anticipating future rewards can actually light up the pleasure centres in your brain.

- Be kind: research has found that giving to friends and strangers decreases stress and contributes to enhanced mental health.

- Infuse positivity in your surroundings - people who put pictures of their loved ones on their desk at work aren't just decorating; they are ensuring a positive hit of emotion each time they glance at them.

- Exercise: it is not just a powerful mood lifter but also a long lasting one. Run, walk, ride, play, stretch, skip or jump around on a pogo stick, it doesn't matter so long as you get moving.

- Spend money, but not on stuff. Spend it on experiences like concerts or a night out with friends. This produces more long lasting positive emotion than buying things. Spending money on other people, such as family and friends, also makes us happy.

- Exercise your strengths; to learn what your top strengths are (you can do this for free at www.viasurvey.org) pick one of your signature strengths and use it in a different way each day. Studies have shown that the more you use your signature strengths in daily life, the happier you become.

The Happiness Advantage (Virgin Books) by Shawn Achor is out in November, $35.

AAP

http://www.theage.com.au/executive-style/management/happiness-the-key-to-success-20101025-170mp.html

In Bond Frenzy, Investors Bet on Inflation

October 25, 2010

In Bond Frenzy, Investors Bet on Inflation

By CHRISTINE HAUSER

At a time when savers complain that they are earning almost no interest from their bank accounts, some investors on Monday bought United States government bonds that effectively had a negative rate of return.

Bizarre as it sounds, that is correct. In an auction of a special kind of five-year Treasury bond, investors paid $105.50 for every $100 of bonds the government sold — agreeing to pay the government for the privilege of lending it money.

The reason is that these types of bonds offer a guaranteed protection against inflation. So, if inflation soars — as some economists worry might happen, with the government seeking to give the economy a boost by flooding it with money — the value of the bonds would go up accordingly.

The investors who took part in the $10 billion auction are betting that inflation, now at about 1 percent annually, will rise to a level that more than compensates for the premium they paid.

The unusual auction on Monday “reflects a condition in the Treasury market that has been in place for months, chiefly that yields on shorter maturities have moved below the inflation rate,” Anthony Crescenzi, a senior vice president at the bond giant Pimco, wrote in a research note.

Guy LeBas, the chief fixed-income strategist for Janney Montgomery Scott, said there were about $28 billion worth of bids for the notes. About 40 percent were foreign buyers, 57 percent dealers and the rest were possibly retail investors, he said. The prediction is for a 1.58 percent rate of inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.

“It was good demand considering the negative yields,” he said. “They are counting on the Fed to be successful in generating inflation.”

As strange as all this may seem, these investors were actually going along with conventional market wisdom. Many economists are concerned that if the economy continues to stagnate, there is a danger of deflation, or a decline in prices, that would be difficult to reverse.

Most analysts expect that the Federal Reserve, which has already lowered interest rates to near zero and bought Treasury securities in efforts to reinvigorate the economy, is about to pump even more money into the system. Such a move would probably increase the rate of inflation.

Fed officials have hinted at such action in recent appearances. In a speech in Boston on Oct. 15, the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, said that “there would appear — all else being equal — to be a case for further action.”

The markets interpreted that and other statements as unmistakable signals that the Fed was poised to act at its next meeting, on Nov. 2-3.

Mr. Bernanke couched his argument in terms of the Fed’s mandate to keep prices stable and maximize employment. He said that inflation had been running well below the implicit target of about 2 percent and that unemployment, at 9.6 percent, was too high.

Inflation-protected Treasury securities have already been trading at negative yields on the open market for some time, as professional and institutional investors have sought to hedge their portfolios against the risk of inflation. But Monday was the first time since the government began selling these so-called Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities in the 1990s that new ones were sold at a negative yield.

Buyers “believe we have reached the bottom of the inflation cycle and the next move is higher, not lower,” said Kevin H. Giddis, the executive managing director and president for fixed-income capital markets at Morgan Keegan & Company.

A growing aversion to risk has produced all manner of investment oddities in the last two years. At the height of the financial crisis, for example, the yield on ordinary short-term Treasury bonds turned negative for a brief time as people flocked to safe investments.

Even now, big investors are buying gold at levels unseen in decades, to protect against fluctuations in the value of currencies. Small investors are fleeing the stock market in droves, favoring bonds and even cash over equities. Companies have managed to sell bonds that do not pay off for 50 or even 100 years.

The remarkable auction occurred as stock indexes on Wall Street edged higher, buoyed by recent strong corporate earnings and a month-to-month rise in housing sales.

Sales of previously owned houses increased 10 percent in September from August, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.53 million units, above forecasts of 4.30 million, but they were still down 19 percent from September 2009. The National Association of Realtors said about a third of the sales last month were related to foreclosures.

On Monday, the Dow Jones industrial average rose 31.49 points, or 0.28 percent, to 11,164.05. The broader Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index gained 2.54 points, or 0.21 percent, to 1,185.62.

The Nasdaq composite index climbed 11.46 points, or 0.46 percent, to 2,490.85.

Bond prices fell, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury rising to 2.56 percent from 2.55 percent late Friday.

As equities advanced, the dollar declined over the weekend after promises by the world’s 20 biggest economies to avoid a currency war.

It was the latest sign that financial markets are positioning for a rise in inflation. Economists point to the fall in the dollar as a sign of budding inflationary pressures. Another is the recent sharp rise in the price of some assets, including commodities like gold.

Graham Bowley and Sewell Chan contributed reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/26/business/26bond.html?ref=business&src=me&pagewanted=print

Warren Buffett believes that the return that a company gets on its equity is one of the most important factors in making successful stock investments.



Warren Buffett believes that the return that a company gets on its equity is one of the most important factors in making successful stock investments.

DEFINING EQUITY


Benjamin Graham defines stockholders equity as:
‘The interest of the stockholders in a company as measured by the capital and surplus.’

CALCULATING OWNER’S EQUITY

Investors can think of stockholders equity like this. An investor who buys a business for $100,000 has an equity of $100,000 in that investment. This sum represents the total capital provided by the investor.
If the investor then makes a net profit each year from the business of $10,000, the return on equity is 10%:
10,000 x 100
  100,000

If however the investor has borrowed $50,000 from a bank and pays an annual amount of interest to the bank of $3500, the calculations change. The total capital in the business remains at $100,000 but the equity in the business (the capital provided by the investor) is now only $50,000 ($100,000 - $50,000).
The profit figures also change. The net profit now is only $6500 ($10,000 - $3,500).
The return on capital (total capital employed, equity plus debt) remains at 10%. The return on equity is different and higher. It is now 13%:
6,500 x 100
 50,000
The approach to financing its operations by a company can obviously affect the returns on equity shown by that company.

WHY WARREN BUFFETT THINKS THAT RETURN ON EQUITY IS IMPORTANT

Just as a 10% return on a business is, all other things being equal, better than a 5% return, so too with corporate rates of returns on equity. Also, a higher return on equity means that surplus funds can be invested to improve business operations without the owners of the business (stockholders) having to invest more capital. It also means that there is less need to borrow.

WHAT RATE OF RETURN ON EQUITY DOES WARREN BUFFETT LOOK FOR?

This is a fluctuating requirement. The benchmarks are the return on prime quality bonds and the average rate of returns of companies in the market. In 1981, Buffett identified the average rate of return on equity of American companies at 11%, so an intelligent investor would like more than that, substantially more, preferably. Bond rates change, so the long-term average bond rate must be considered, when viewing a long-term investment.
In 1972, Buffett implied that a rate of return on equity of at least 14% was desirable. Although, at times, Warren Buffett has appeared to downplay the importance of Return on Equity, he constantly refers to a high rate of return as a basic investment principle.

COMPANY RATES OF RETURN ON EQUITY

It is significant that the majority of companies in the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio in 2002 all had higher than average returns on equity over a ten-year period. For example:
Coca Cola45.05
American Express20.19
Gillette40.43

INVESTMENT DANGERS

There can be dangers in averaging returns over a long period. A company might start with high rates which then fall away, but still have a healthy average. Conversely, a company might be going in the opposite direction. As Warren Buffett looks for predictability in a company’s earnings, one would imagine that he would favour companies who increase their ROE or which have consistent levels.

COMPANY ANNUAL RATES OF RETURN

Compare the annual rates of return on equity of the following companies, using summary figures provided by Value Line.






YearCoca ColaGap IncWal-Mart Stores
199347.722.921.7
199448.823.321.1
199555.421.618.6
199656.727.417.8
199756.533.719.1
19984252.421
19993450.522.1
200039.43020.1
2001354.319.1
20023513.120.4

RETURN ON CAPITAL IS VERY IMPORTANT

The example early on this page shows that debt financing can be used to increase the rate of return on equity. This can be misleading and also problematical if interest rates rise or fall. This is probably one reason why Warren Buffett prefers companies with little or no debt. The rate of return on equity is a true one and future earnings are less unpredictable. A careful investor like Buffett would always take rates of return on total capital into account. The average rates of return of capital in the companies referred to above in Berkshire Hathaway portfolio are:






Coca Cola39.12
American Express13.68
Gillette25.93
A comparison of the rates of return on equity and capital for these three companies is significant and the reader can make their own calculations.




http://www.buffettsecrets.com/return-on-equity.htm

Filial tradition in China withering

Filial tradition in China withering
By Zhang Yuchen (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-10-25


Elderly entering old age without support of kids

GUANGZHOU - A recent study of the elderly in parts of Guangdong province, in southern China, has shown that the tradition of children supporting their aged parents is slowly fading away.

The survey of nearly 1,300 people aged 60 or above, living in urban areas, found that, more and more, the elderly are living by themselves and are instead providing financial support to their adult children.


Two elderly women applaud a performance by young volunteers who come regularly to the Songtang Hospice, in Beijing, to offer care and entertainment for the older patients, on Oct 16. [Wang Jing / China Daily]

The study was done by the Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences' elderly affairs research center, from July to September of this year, and found that more than 10 percent of the people have to give monetary support to their adult children on a monthly basis. A third of them give money to their children from time to time.

Related readings:
Shanghai's elderly enjoy public, private care
Elderly get the world at their doorstep
Mental care for the elderly
High suicide rate haunts Chinese elderly

Some 16 percent of the elderly said they found this hard to bear because giving away a part of their pension had a serious impact on the quality of life in retirement.
Chinese tradition over the centuries, as has been the case in many other countries, has been for people to have as many children as possible so that they can rely on them for support when they get too old to care for themselves.

They often live with their children and help with the housework or take care of grandchildren, when the parents are busy with their work.

The study found more than 40 percent of the elderly comply with tradition and take care of grandchildren, while around 20 percent help with the housework.

But changing social conditions are now forcing more of the urban elderly to fend for themselves and 62 percent of them live apart from their grown-up children.

And, only 48 percent of these "empty nesters" can expect a weekly visit from their children, while around 28 percent can expect a visit once a month. For 24 percent, it's only once every year.

Perhaps surprisingly, even when they live with their children, most of the elderly are confronted with loneliness. The study found that more than 75 percent of the elderly long for greater spiritual support from their children.

One 72-year-old man surnamed Chen, in Guangzhou's Baiyun district, said he felt a lack of communication with his son even though he can see his son's family frequently, since they live in the same community.

"I never have supper with my son' s family because I don't want to disturb the only part of the day when they have time to spend together," Chen said, "And because my son seldom expresses much, we talk less."

Once, he said, he was sick in bed for two months and his son didn't even notice.

According to some doctors, this empty-nester syndrome is becoming a social problem - one that can not be ignored.

"With an increasingly aging society, the number of elderly empty-nesters increases annually," said Zhang Yanchi, a doctor at Guangzhou's Baiyun Psychiatric Hospital.

Li Dandan, of the Guangzhou Volunteers' Union, has suggested that it would be better if the elderly just spoke directly with their children about their feelings and their situation. An alternative is to communicate more with other elderly people in the community.

Guangdong had 10.47 million people aged 60 or above by the end of 2009, Nanfang Daily reported in February.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-10/25/content_11451440.htm

Top 10 profitable companies in China

Web Exclusive
Top 10 profitable companies in China
(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2010-03-30 11:26



All but two of China's top 10 most profitable Shanghai- or Shenzhen-listed companies in 2009 are from the energy or financial sector, the Beijing Times reported Tuesday, based on 832 annual financial reports, or more than half of the total that were released by Monday morning.

With a staggering 129.4 billion yuan ($18.95 billion) in after-tax profit, the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), the world's biggest lender by market value, replaced PetroChina Co as the country's most profitable listed company, followed by China Construction Bank with 106.84 billion yuan ($15.65 billion), according to the newspaper citing Wind Info, a financial data provider in China.

PetroChina Co, the country's largest oil and gas producer, came in third with 103.39 billion yuan ($15.14 billion) in net profit last year and Bank of China, the country's third-largest lender by market value, took fourth place with 81.07 billion yuan.


Related full coverage:Top 10 profitable companies in China 2009 Annual Reports of Listed Companies 


Sinopec Corp, Asia's top oil refiner, ranked fifth with 61.76 billion yuan ($9.05 billion), and China Shenhua Energy Co, China's largest coal producer, sixth with 30.28 billion yuan ($4.43 billion).
The other four are Industrial Bank Co (13.3 billion yuan), a mid-sized Chinese lender; China Unicom (9.56 billion yuan), China's No 2 mobile carrier; China Vanke Co (5.33 billion yuan), the country's biggest property developer by market value and Huaneng Power International Co (5.08 billion yuan), China's biggest listed electricity producer.

The total profit of the top 10 companies is 561.14 billion yuan, or 75 percent of the total for the 832 companies combined. The total profit for the 832 companies is 749.55 billion yuan.

Other companies that are likely to make the top 10 list include China Life Insurance Co and China Merchants Bank, which have yet to release their annual reports.

The list excluded Chinese companies that list in Hong Kong, like China Mobile.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2010-03/30/content_9661921.htm

Malaysia's PM Najib seeks end to race debate

Malaysia's PM Najib seeks end to race debate
By Melissa Goh | Posted: 21 October 2010

Prime Minister Najib Razak addresses the ruling party's annual general assembly in Kuala Lumpur


Malaysia's PM Najib seeks end to race debate

KUALA LUMPUR : Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak wants an end to debate on the special rights and preferential treatment of Malays.

Speaking at the general assembly of the ruling UMNO party on Thursday, he said the talk on the issue is threatening racial harmony and national stability.

Addressing delegates, Mr Najib also urged the country's Malays to be competitive and stop relying on handouts.

PM Najib seeks to achieve a new era in race relations - one that's based on a shared future for all.

Mr Najib took over as UMNO president last March and since then, he has set in motion a transformation programme to shed the party's corrupt and arrogant image, to one that's more inclusive and relevant.

He also urged all sides to stop the debate over the Malay's special rights and privileges, as they have a historical context and cannot be withdrawn without first obtaining the consent of the traditional rulers.

"Whether we like it or not, we have to respect the consensus, because it is key to our continued survival. If it is open to debate, we are worried it will cause uneasiness and instigate the primordial instincts which exist between ethnic groups," said PM Najib.

Similarly, he said that the non-Malays should not feel threatened, as their citizenship and birthright are guaranteed under the constitution.

While UMNO will continue to defend the special rights, quota, and permits of the Malays, Mr Najib said the Malays should aim to compete globally.

He said: "Malays should be able to compete with the best and the strongest. Malays must become the greatest on the world stage."

Mr Najib's presidential address received a rousing response from delegates, including former party president and prime minister Mahathir Mohamad.

"I think this speech would have cleared the air quite a bit for all communities - that there are certain things we can discuss, that there are certain things we can change, but there are also certain things that we cannot change. Whether there is an election or not, I think it is good that everybody understands the real position," said Dr Mahathir.

But other Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties feel differently.

Chua Soi Lek, President of the Malaysia Chinese Association said: "We are aware of the sensitivity of the issues involved, but there should be room for discussion, especially on its implementation."

Samy Vellu, President of the Malaysia Indian Congress said: "It's not question of questioning; it's a question of living together, it's a question of understanding each other, and also it's a question of feeling for each other."

While Mr Najib is keeping the people guessing when the next general election is going to be, analysts said the speech was aimed at consolidating his support within the party.

But many find it difficult to reconcile it with his 1Malaysia principle - which is to ensure equal opportunities for all, regardless of race or religion. - CNA /ls

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/southeastasia/view/1088541/1/.html