Book Summary: The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

As shocking as this may sound to some of you, I just finished reading The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham. The shocking part for many of you may be why I only read it now. Well, the answer is a dumb one but it's the truth. I remember looking at some excerpt of the book 5 or 10 years ago and saw something about railroads (or something like that). Back then, being the young, dumb, person I was, I was like "What the hell is a railroad? Aren't those some ancient relics of the past? I know there is a train that goes by my house but so what? Does anyone even make money on them?" Obviously my youthful arrogance, not to mention lack of time, made the worst of me. Little did I realize that, although the examples are somewhat dated, the concepts behind the book were quite insightful. I do have to admit that I have read most of Graham's principles in articles, websites, reports, and so forth, so I basically knew most of Graham's philsophies (I just didn't get around the reading his actual book).

I think it's quite fitting to pick the best value investing book of all time as my first book review on this "young" site. Since this book has been beaten to death by many (i.e. talked about, quoted, reviewed, etc), I probably won't provide much insight. I think my future book commentaries may be more interesting given that my interests are diverse and I may pick something less commonly talked about.

For most of the books I'll be looking at, I won't necessarily write a review but instead talk about insightful elements from the book, while adding some thoughts regarding my investments. If you find anything I say interesting, purchase the book or sign it out at the library or something (written knowledge is one of the cheapest things in life).

(All errors in quotations are mine. Please do point them out to me. All italics and bolds are mine.)

(image courtesy amazon.com)

The Intelligent Investor: A Book of Practical Counsel
By Benjamin Graham
2003 Revised Edition (based on the 1973 4th edition)

You know you are reading something great when the book you signed out from the library is worn out even though it is only a 2003 book. In fact, I had to sign out multiple times (didn't finish in time) and each book was worn out. Warren Buffett even considers The Intelligent Investor the best investing book ever written.

The edition I read was the 2003 revised edition with commentary by Jason Zweig (of Fortune)--this edition happens to be based on the 1973 edition. Although I haven't read the other editions, and some think the earlier editions are better, I think this one is best for newbies such as myself. The problem with investment books is that the market environment changes so rapidly that some of the concepts may not be relevant--and in fact wrong. Jason Zweig does a fine job giving modern examples (from the 2000s), as well as elaborating on Graham's points at the end of each chapter. However, Jason Zweig mainly addresses Graham's defensive investors (definition below) so I found most of what he said to be not too insightful.

If there is a weakness in the book, it is the fact that the prose isn't necessarily easy to understand, and that some things aren't as significant nowadays. For instance, it would be difficult to find many securities in a stock market in a developed country satisfying Graham's requirements. Criteria such as high dividend yield and price below book value are rare nowadays. A bear market will result in more securities fitting Graham's requirements but, even then, the selection will likely be small. Some of the things that Graham talks about, such as warrant dilution, is also less of an issue now, as Jason Zweig points out (although warrant dilution has been replaced with option dilution so human behaviour is still the same).

The Intelligent Investor is written for lay investors and is relatively easy to read. Being the so-called father of value investing, Graham defines the core terms that are important to value investors. In the paragraphs below, I will talk about items that I personally find useful (this means that I will skip over many other things that you may find benefitial).

Some Categorization

The first thing an investor needs to understand is the difference between an investor and a speculator. Graham cites the following:

An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis promises safety of principal and an adquate return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.

Note that I emphasized the notion of safety of principal. Graham's definition has nothing to do with volatility or inherent risk in an asset. In contrast, the Wall Street view keeps changing with time. At one time, all stocks were considered speculative; while at other times, almost all stocks were investments.

Graham also goes on to seperate intelligent investors into two camps:

• Defensive Investor: One who wants safety and less involvement
• Enterprising Investor: One who wants higher returns that he/she is willing to work for

In contrast to the conventional view, an enterprising investor is not one who is more risky or aggressive; instead, it is one who has an interest in investing and is willing to work hard for it. I think it is important for investors to figure out which category they fall into. I, as well as nearly all readers of this blog, will be considered enterprising investors. Therefore, I will only talk about concepts inThe Intelligent Investor that apply to enterprising investors. Make sure you understand that most of what I reference below is not suitable for defensive investors.

What to Avoid

There are many roads that lead to the Kingdom of Financial Success. You can become wealthy by pursuing a multitude of methods, but if you choose to follow Graham's techniques, you should avoid the following:

• Trading
• Short-term selection (buying based on near-term expected earnings results)
• Long-term selection (buying based on expected future growth (typically in computers, drugs, etc))

Graham suggests that any successful strategy be "sound and promising" and "not popular on Wall Street". In the book, he develops some strategies that fit those desired conditions. For enterprising investors, Graham tells them to avoid:

• High quality preferred stocks: These are mainly advantageous for cross-corporation purchases because corporations supposedly don't pay taxes on them
• Bonds and lower quality preferreds: Never buy lower quality bonds at par.Only purchase if they are trading 30% below par for the high coupon ones, and a bit lower for the lower coupon ones
• Foreign government bonds: These generally do poorly, and right now many emerging market bonds are priced as if they will never default--something I find unlikely
• New issues (IPOs) and new stock offerings (by existing companies): A lot of statistical evidence from other sources against this idea
• Common stocks with short history of good earnings

Since I'm looking at the Pulte Homes exchange-traded bonds (PHA), I'm going to delve into Graham's comments about bonds for a bit. I'm not sure if PHA would be considered second grade or not. Moody's has Pulte's bonds on watch for a potential downgrade, which will put them into junk territory so you are looking at a very low quality bond. But Pulte is one of the largest homebuilders in USA so it is a leading company (secondary companies are not leaders). Graham essentially says never to buy second grade bonds at par value! Graham points out that practically all bonds trade below par when economic conditions are poor, so should be patient and wait. In fact, in an ideal situation, first grade bonds of high quality corporations can trade at a big discount at times (Graham points to railroad bonds early on and utility bonds later on).

If one if interested in bonds, best place to look is in out of favour sectors. Recall that Warren Buffett and Mohnish Pabri bought Level 3 Communications convertibles back in 2002 (I believe), when technology stocks were totally out of favour. Right now homebuilders are totally out of favour and that's why I'm looking at them. Right now PHA is trading 20% below par (with a yield of around 8.4%), and I'm waiting until price drops even further to, say, 40% below par (and yield of around 10%). If Moody's downgrades the bonds (a possibility if Pulte posts weak earnings this quarter), I think they will drop to my target range.

If you ever thought stocks were volatile, wait until you check out foreign bonds (on a side note, I think a lot of emerging market bond buyers are going to suffer greatly when the commodities boom ends within a few years). Anyone up for a rollercoaster ride:

How many readers have any idea of the repeated vicissitudes of the 8% bonds of Czechoslovakia, since they were first offered in this country in 1922 at 96.5? They advanced to 112 in 1928, declined to 67.75 in 1932, recovered to 106 in 1936, collapsed to 6 in 1939, recovered (unbelievably) to 117 in 1946, fell promptly to 35 in 1948, and sold as low as 8 in 1970!

Strategies to Use

For the enterprising investor, Graham recommends the following strategies:

• Relatively unpopular large company: This would entail buying unpopular S&P500-type companies in a group
• Bargain Issues: Graham says to buy securities 50% below their true value. You determine the actual worth by (i) appraisal, where you discount future earnings, or (ii) business value to a private buyer, where you look at future earnings but also seriously consider net current asset
• Special situation or "workout": This involves things like merger arbitrage, takeovers, bankruptcy investing, and so forth. Graham says only a small percentage of enterprising investors are likely to use this method so this book does not go into this strategy.

Graham strongly suggests that one needs to be dedicated if they are to follow the enterprising investor role:

The aggressive investor must have a considerable knowledge of security values--enough in fact, to warrant viewing his security operations as equivalent to a business enterprise. There is no room in this philosophy for a middle ground, or a series of gradations, between the passive and aggressive status. Many, perhaps most, investors seek to place themselves in such an intermediate category; in our opinion that is a compromise that is more likely to produce dissapointment than achievment.

The Intelligent Investor elaborates on some tools to be used in analyzing securities. It is quite brief but it gives enough of a starting point for the lay investor to pursue. One of the insightful items I found was the following simplified formula for valuing growth stocks:

value = current_(normal)_earnings x [8.5 + 2 x expected_annual_growth_rate]

So at 0% growth, P/E is 8.5, and growth in 10 years is 0.
At 2.5% growth rate, P/E is 13.5, and growth in 10 years is 28%.
At 5% growth rate, P/E is 18.5, and growth in 10 years is 63%.

I was always uncertain when it came to pricing future growth and this rough formula provides some help to me. It isn't accurate but one should keep in mind that projecting the future can be misleading so a rough guide is all that I want.

It seems obvious nowadays but it's worth mentioning the point from Graham about earnings manipulation. Graham says to read the fine point (footnotes) and think about charges and other one-time items. He recommends that one should use average earnings over a period of time, rather that the present one year earnings. (Instead of earnings, it is prudent to look at ROIC and book value per share growth--this is not Graham's suggestion).

Based on his experience at his firm, Graham-Newman, Graham suggests the following for enterprising investors:

• Arbitrages: True arbitrage is risk-free but most so-called "arbitrage" strategies carried out by most people are single-sided bets. For instance, when Warren Buffett recently took a stake in Dow Jones, before it was acquired by News Corporation, there was no way to hedge the transaction*.
• Liquidations: This involves buying shares where you will receive cash payments from liquidations. This sounds interesting but I am not sure how to search for these stocks (if anyone has some ideas, leave comments or e-mail me please).
• Related hedges: Graham talks about buying covertibles and selling the underlying stock
• Net current asset (bargain) issues: Buying below 2/3 net current asset value. Graham suggests wide diversification (his firm had 100 securities at once).

(* On a side note, I thought that deal was risky (before hearing about Buffett's move) but Buffett clearly thought otherwise. The risk I saw was that the family that controlled Dow Jones may not accept the deal but Buffett correctly predicted the deal consummation.)

One strategy is to look at beaten down cyclicals:

If he [enterprising investor] followed our philosophy in this field he would more likely be the buyer of important cyclical enterprises--such as steel shares perhaps--when the current situation is unfavourable, the near-term prospects are poor, and the low price fully reflects the current pessimissm.

The above is what being a contrarian is all about!

Graham suggests the following screen to narrow down stocks:

• (a) current assets greater than 1.5 x liabilities; (b) debt less than 110% of net current assets (for industrial companies)
• no earnings deficit in last 5 years
• some current dividend
• earnings greater today than 5(?) years ago
• stock price less than 120% of net tangible assets

There are very few stocks that will pass that screen right now (the screen for a defensive investor is even more stricter than what is given above). To satisfy Graham's filter, one either needs to wait for a market correction or look at ignored places like foreign stocks, smallcap stocks, pink sheet stocks, and so forth.

The Most Important Lessons

Even if one doesn't follow everything else that was covered in the book, there are two important insights for any investor.

The first is the God-like entity that we all love and hate, Mr. Market. The ever-emotional Mr. Market has a habit of offering prices higher than the true worth of a firm, and at other times, a price lower than what a company is worth. The lesson to learn is that one should take advantage of the market and sell when the offering price is higher than a company's true value, and buy when the price is clearly below the worth of a company. The choice to act is yours and, in general, one should just ignore the quoted prices. Investing is as simple as that!

The second important point can be summed up in a few words--perhaps the most important in all of investing--by Graham: margin of safety. Those three words are just as immortal as the old saying that applies to all situations: "this too shall pass". If there is something that seperates value investors from other investing styles, it is this concept of margin of safety.

Graham suggests that an investor only buy securities with a big margin, where the price paid is far below the value of the business. He also recommends diversification in addition to a margin of safety (although I should note that Graham at one time had 25% of his portfolio in one stock, GEICO--he made more money on this than all his other investments combined).

Ultimately, Graham says that investors should think like a businessperson. He gives some principles to act like a businessperson:

• Know what you are doing--know your business: Just like a businessperson knows the details of the product or service he/she is selling, so should you.
• Do note let anyone else run your business unless (1) you can supervise his performance with adequate care and comprehension or (2) you have unusually strong reasons for placing implicit confidence in his integrity and ability.: Only let others manage your money if they fit these suggestions.
• Do not enter upon an operation--that is, manufacturing or trading in an item--unless a reliable calculation shows that it has a fair chance to yield a reasonable profit. In particular, keep away from ventures in which you have little to gain and much to lose.: Graham says the an investment decision should be based on arithmetic rather than optimism.
• Have the courage of your knowledge and experience. If you have formed a conclusion from the facts and if you know your judgment is sound, act on it--even though others may hesitate or differ. (You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.): Graham is basically saying that one needs to act on their convictions after a solid case can be made.

The above suggestions are the hardest for me. I need to start thinking like as if I'm running a real business.

Final Opinion

Overall, I think this is a remarkable book--Benjamin Graham isn't called the father of value investing for nothing. Since a lot of the concepts have been repeated in other books or covered in magazines, I did not find this book as mindblowing as some others may have. I highly recommend this book to any investor that has some knowledge of investing (if you are total newbie and doesn't know what a bond or preferred share is then you should read an introductory book before this one). Even if you are not a value investor, you should check out this book to see what value investing is all about. Contrarians will find a lot of insight from an experienced master who lived and breathed Wall Street for almost half a century.

http://can-turtles-fly.blogspot.com/2007/10/book-summary-intelligent-investor-by.html

A Summary of the Principles of Benjamin Graham

The Intelligent Investor

Part 1 - A Summary of the Principles of Benjamin Graham

1.     Speculation vs. Realistic Results

Investment vs. Speculation

Investing, as defined by Benjamin Graham, promises Safety of Principal and an adequate return by thoroughly analyzing investment opportunities.  Investing may be contrasted to Speculating.  Speculation includes any activity that unduly risks principal.  Speculation is acceptable only if the speculator acknowledges that such behavior will result in losses over the long run.  If the speculator confuses his activity for investing, undertakes it seriously, or risks more than he can afford to lose, then the speculator is acting foolishly.

The Defensive Investor

The Defensive Investor seeks Safety of Principal and freedom from bother.   Without exertion, the defensive investor cannot expect to achieve better than average results.  Yet achieving results that are better than average is itself uncommon.  In fact, most mutual funds fail to achieve better than average results. 

The Defensive Investor’s portfolio is comprised of 1^st quality common stocks and bonds, of which neither comprises less than 25% of the portfolio at any one time.  Thus, the defensive investor may hold as much as 75% stock at the end of a recession and as little as 25% stock at the end of a bull market.  Notwithstanding, market timing itself is speculation.  Stocks provide a hedge against inflation.  1^st quality bonds are less subject to severe price fluctuations in turbulent markets.

                 

The Defensive Compromise

Investment quality bonds are always safer than stock except during periods of inflation.  Inflation causes interest rates to rise, and this devalues fixed income securities.  A business that can raise prices has protection against inflation.  Appreciation of common stocks is based largely on reinvestment of earnings, which usually increases during periods of inflation (albeit maybe not during periods of stagflation).  Thus, a conservative investor should keep at least 25% of his portfolio in stock as a hedge against inflation.  As stated, the defensive investor can expect no more than average results.  The defensive investor can not do better by purchasing new offerings or “hot” issues to make a quick profit.  In fact, the contrary is almost certain.

Three alternatives for the Defensive Investor

1.      Buy shares of established investment funds.

2.      Utilize a trust company, bank, or certified investment counselor.

3.      Use Dollar-Cost-Averaging, which means placing equal monetary amounts into a fund regardless of the current economy.  However, this assumes that the investor will have the same resources available to him in all economies, regardless of his employment status, and that the investor has the courage to continue investing during turbulent times.

The Enterprising Investor

Although the enterprising investor should expect to do better than the defensive investor, he is likely to do worse.  Three speculative areas that the investor should avoid are:

1.  Trading in the market – short selling and betting against trends.  This neither offers safety of principal nor a satisfactory return. 

2.  Short-term selectivity – buying stock of firms that are expected to report increased earnings.  Not only may the investor be wrong in his selection, but also the issue may be fully valued due to a relatively efficient market.

          3.  Long term selectivity – Choosing companies that show great promise.  The same arguments         apply for short and long term selectivity based upon expected favorable results.  

To achieve success, an investor must follow policies that are sound and not popular on Wall Street.  There are large discrepancies between market price and actual value.  Often, speculative stock movements are at unreasonably high or low levels.  Nonetheless, buying neglected and undervalued issues can prove both protracted and frustrating.

The ingrained, long-standing and seemingly insane maxim of Wall Street is to buy stocks when they have gone up and to sell them when they have gone down.  This is as opposed to the cliché of buying low and selling high.  One may take advantage of this contradiction by concentrating on bargain issues, that is, those possessing a market price less than their net current asset value (i.e. working capital less long term liabilities).

The search for these types of issues, and the diligence required to  investigate them, is not worth an investor’s time unless the investor can add at least 5% before taxes to the average annual return.  Thus, the aggressive investor seeks a 5% return over the market average.

 

2.  Inflation

Fixed income investments fare worse during inflationary periods than do common stocks.  During inflationary periods, firms can increase prices, profits, and dividends causing their share price to increase and offsetting declines in purchasing power.  In 1970, the most probable average future rate of inflation was 3%. 

The investor can not count on more than a 10% return above the net tangible assets of the DJIA.  This is consistent with the suggestion that the average investor may earn a dividend return of 3.6% on their market value and 4% on reinvested profits. 

There is no underlying connection between inflation and the movement of common stock earnings and prices.  Appreciation does not result from inflation, but rather from the re-investment of profits.  The only way for inflation to increase common stock values is to raise the rate of earnings on capital investment, which it has not done historically.

Economic prosperity usually is accompanied by slight inflation, which does not affect returns.  Offsetting factors include rising wage rates that exceed productivity gains and additional capital needs that cause interest rates to increase.  The investor has no reason to believe that he can achieve average annual returns better than 8% on DJIA type investments. 

   Graham describes alternatives to common stocks as a hedge against inflation.  These alternatives range from gold and diamonds to rare paintings, stamps, and coins.  Gold has performed poorly, far worse than returns from savings in a bank account.  The latter categories, such as paying thousands of dollars for a rare coin, can not qualify as an “investment operation.”  Real Estate is still another alternative; however, its value fluctuates widely, and serious errors may be made when purchasing individual locations.  Again, the defensive investor is best served by purchasing a portfolio of carefully chosen common stocks and bonds.

3.  Stock Market History

During the last 100 years, stocks have made an underlying advance through numerous market cycles.  These cycles can be divided into 10 year periods. 

The period from 1900 to 1968 can be subdivided into three segments.  From 1900 to 1929, market cycles lasted 3 to 5 years.  From 1929 to 1949, the DJIA barely moved, rising a mere 1.5% per year, evidencing the public disdain for common stocks.  Then, from 1949 to 1968, there was mostly one single bull market punctuated by only several short recessions.  During this 20 year period the DJIA advanced 6 times, averaging an annual 11% compounded rate of return not including average dividend returns of 3.5%, for a total return of 14% per annum.  Just when the market seemed its rosiest, the DJIA fell 36% between 1968 and 1970, then returned to an all time high in 1972.  1970 marked a definite deterioration in the health of American firms.  The average ROIC fell to its lowest level since WWII, and a number of important bankruptcies occurred.  Measuring market performance in 10 year increments smoothes annual fluctuations.

Only 2 of the last 8 decades had a decrease in common stock earnings and prices.  However, shorter term fluctuations have been more severe.  For example, during the period from 1959 to 1961, many “hot” issues went public at astoundingly high valuations.  These valuations were further elevated by speculation.  By 1962, many of these same issues had lost as much as 90% of their value.

In the 1964 writing of the “Intelligent Investor”, Graham believed that the market was overvalued.  He stated that the old standards of valuation were inapplicable and major investing uncertainties existed.  He stated that if the current market level was not too high, then no price was too high.  When markets are overvalued, Graham recommends the following actions:

1)      Do not borrow to buy or hold securities. 

2)      Do not increase the proportion of stocks held in funds.

3)      Reduce common stock holdings to no more than 50% of the overall portfolio.

4)      Suspend contributions to any “dollar-cost averaging” stock contribution plan.       

4.  The Defensive Investor’s Portfolio Policy

 

Those who can not afford to take risks should be content with a relatively low return.   The rate of return is dependent upon the amount of effort put forth by an investor.  As previously stated, the defensive investor’s portfolio should consist of no less than 25% high grade bonds and no less than 25% large stocks. Yet these maxims are difficult to follow, because like the herd of Wall Street, when the market has been advancing, the temptation is strong to bet heavily on stocks. This is the same facet of human nature that produces bear markets.  The time to invest in the stock market is after it has suffered a large loss.

            A 50% ratio of stocks and bonds was a prudent choice except during periods of excessive increases or decreases in stock value.  This simple formula guards against the mistakes caused by human nature even if it does not provide for the best returns.  Again, Safety of Principal is Graham’s chief concern.

            Bonds  

            The decision between purchasing taxable and tax-free bonds depends mainly on the difference in income to the investor after taxes.  Those in a higher bracket have a greater incentive to closely examine this issue.  For example, in 1972, an investor may have lost 30% of his income from investing in municipal issues (“munis”) as opposed to taxable issues. 

Bonds come in many types, a description of which follows: 

            US Savings Bonds are a great choice.  In 1972, they came in two series:  E and H.  The Series H Bond paid semi-annual interest.  Series E Bonds did not pay interest, but rather sold at a discount to their coupon rate.  In 1972, Series E bonds provided the right to defer income tax payments until the bond was redeemed, which in some cases increased the value by as much as one-third.  Both E and H Series Bonds are redeemable at any time providing bondholders protection from shrinkage of principal during periods of rising interest rates (or rather, the ability to benefit from rising rates).  Both series paid in or around 5% in 1972.  Federal, but not state, income tax was payable on both series.  Graham recommends US Bonds due to their assurance of transferability, coupon rate, and security. 

            Other US Bonds come in many varieties.  Federal taxes, but not state taxes, are charged on other US Bonds.  Some of these issues are discounted heavily.  Others bonds are guaranteed, but not issued, by the US government.  As of 1972, the US government had fully honored its commitments under all guarantee obligations.  Federal guarantees, in essence, permit additional spending by various federal agencies outside of their formal budgets.

            State and Municipal Bonds are exempt from federal and state tax in the State of their issue.  However, not all of these bonds possess sufficient protection to be considered worthy of investment.  To be worthy of investment, a bond should possess a minimum rating of “A”.     

            Corporate Bonds are taxable and offer higher yields than all types of government issues bonds. 

            Junk Bonds are those that are less than investment grade.  Their title is aptly given.  The investor should steer clear of these issues.  The additional yield that junk bonds provide is rarely worth their risk.

            Savings and Money Market Accounts are a viable substitute for US Bonds.  They usually pay interest rates close to rates paid on short-term US bonds. 

            Preferred Stocks should be avoided.  Not only does the preferred holder lack the legal claim of a bondholder (as a creditor), but also he lacks the profit possibilities of the common stock holder (as a partner).  The only time to purchase preferred stock, if ever, is when its price is unduly depressed during times of temporary adversity.

            Early redemption of bonds by issuers was commonplace before 1970, and resulted in an unfair advantage for the issuer by not allowing the investor to participate in significant upside values if interest rates fell.  However, this practice largely stopped.  The investor should sacrifice a small amount of yield to ensure that his bonds are not callable.

5.  The Defensive Investor and Common Stock

Common Stocks offer protection against inflation and provide a better than average return to investors.  This higher return results from a combination of the dividend yield and the reinvestment of earnings (undistributed profits), which increases value.  However, these benefits are lost when the investor pays too high a price.  One should recall that prices did not recover again to their 1929 highs for another 25 years.  However, the defensive investor can not do without a common stock component.

4 Rules for the Defensive Investor Accumulating Common Stock:

1.      There should be adequate, although not excessive, diversification; that is, between 10 and thirty stocks.

2.      Each stock should be large, prominent, and conservatively financed.  Conservatively financed means a debt to capital ratio no greater than 30%.  Large and prominent means that the firm, in 1972 dollars, has at least $50 million in assets and annual sales, and it should at least in the top third of its industry group.  Each of the 30 DJIA firms met this criteria in 1972.

3.      Each firm should have a long record of continuous dividend payments.

4.      Each stock should cost no more than 25 times the average of the last 7 years of earnings, and no more than 20 times the last 12 months earnings.

This last rule virtually bans all growth and other “in-favor” stocks.  Due to the fact that these issues sell at high price, they necessarily possess a speculative element.  A “growth stock” should at least double its earnings per share every 10 years for a minimum compounded rate of return of 7.1%. 

The best of the growth stocks, IBM, lost 50% of its value during the declines of 1961 and 1962.  Texas Instruments went from $5 to $256 (a 50x increase) in six years without a dividend payment as its earnings rose from $0.40 to $3.94 (a 10x increase); 2 years later TI’s earnings fell 50% while its stock price fell 80% to $50.

The temptations here are great, as growth stocks chosen at the correct prices provide enormous results.  However boring, large firms that are unpopular will invariably perform better for the defensive investor.

Dollar Cost Averaging (“DCA”) often is popular during rising markets.  If DCA is adhered to over many years, then this formula should work.  The difficulty is that few people are so situated that they can invest the same amount each year.  Economic downturns often constrain one’s ability to invest just when stocks are trading at their lowest valuations.  Furthermore, when prosperity for the average investor returns, so too do high valuations.

Most people fall into the “defensive investor” category.  Graham provides examples such as a widow who cannot afford unnecessary risks, a physician who cannot devote the time for proper analysis, and a young man whose small investment will not return enough gain to justify the extra effort.  The beginning investor should not try to beat the market.

The investor only realizes a loss in value through the sale of the asset or the significant deterioration of the firm’s underlying value.  Careful selection and diversification helps to avoid these risks.  A more common and difficult problem is overpaying for securities; that is, paying more for a security than its intrinsic value warrants.

6.  Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor – the Negative Side

What to Avoid

The aggressive investor should start with the same base as the defensive investor, dividing the portfolio more or less equally between stocks and bonds.  To avoid losses or returns lower than that of the defensive investor, the aggressive investor should steer clear of the following pitfalls:

1.      Avoid all preferred stocks.  Preferred stock rarely possesses upside component that is the basis for owning common stock. Yet compared to debt, preferred stock affords little protection.  Since dividends can be suspended at anytime, unlike debt, why not just own debt instead? 

2.      Avoid inferior (“high yield” or “junk”) bonds unless such bonds are purchased at least 30% below their par value for high coupon issues, or 50% below par value for other issues.  The risk of these issues is rarely worth the interest premium that they offer.

3.      Avoid all new issues.

4.      Avoid firms with “excellent” earnings limited to the recent past.

Quality bonds should have “Times Interest Earned” ratio, that is EBIT/net interest, of at least 5x. 

Preferred stocks, convertible bonds, and other high yield or “junk” bonds often trade significantly below par during their issue, so purchasing them at par is unwise.  During economic downturns, lower quality bonds and preferred stocks often experience “severe sinking spells” where they trade below 70% of their par value.  For the minor advantage in annual income of 1%-2%, the buyer risks losing a substantial amount of capital, which is bad business.  Yet purchasing these issues at par value provides no ability to achieve capital gains. Therefore, unless second grade bonds can be purchased at a substantial discount, they are bad deals!

Foreign Government Bonds are worse than domestic high yield junk, for the owner of foreign obligations has no legal or other means of enforcing their claims.  This has been true since 1914.  Foreign bonds should be avoided at all costs.

Investors should be wary of all new issues.  New issues are best left for speculators.  In addition to the usual risks, new issues have salesmanship behind them, which artificially raises the price and requires an additional level of resistance.  Aversion becomes paramount as the quality of these issues decrease. 

During favorable periods, many firms trade in their debt for new bonds with lower coupons.  This inevitably results in too high a price paid for these new issues, which then experience significant declines in principal value.

Common stock issues take two forms - - those that are already traded publicly (secondary issues) and those that are not already traded publicly (IPOs).  Stock that is already publicly traded does not ordinarily call for active selling by investment houses, whereas the issue of new stock requires an active selling effort.  Most new issues are sold for account of the controlling interests, which allows them to cash-in their equity during the next several years and to diversify their own finances.  Not only does danger arise from the poor character of businesses brought public, but also from the favorable market conditions that permit initial public offerings.

New issues during a bull market usually follow the same cycle.  As a bull market is established, new issues are brought public at reasonable prices, from which adequate profits may be made.  As the market rise continues, the quality of new issues wanes.  In fact, one important signal of a market downturn is that new common stocks of small, nondescript firms are offered at prices higher than the current level for those of medium sizes with long market histories. 

In many cases, new issues of common stock lose 75% or more of their initial value.  Thus, the investor should avoid new issues and their salespeople.  These issues may be excellent values several years after their initial offering, but that will be when nobody else wants them.

7.     Portfolio Policy for the Enterprising Investor - the positive side

Selection of Bonds 

In addition to the US Bonds described in previous chapters, US guaranteed bonds like “New Housing Authority Bonds” and “New Community Bonds” (both of which were widely available in 1972), as well as tax free municipal bonds serviced by lease payments of A rated corporations, are good investments.  Lower quality bonds may be attainable at true bargains in “special situations”, however these have characteristics that are more similar to common stocks.

Selection of Stocks

The enterprising investor usually conducts 4 activities:

1.      Buying in low markets and selling in high markets.

2.      Buying carefully chosen growth stocks.

3.      Buying bargain issues.

4.      Buying into “special situations”.

1.      Market timing - This is a difficult proposition at best.  Market timing is more of a speculative activity.

2.      Growth Stocks – This also is difficult.  These issues are already fully priced.  In fact, their growth may cease at any time.  As a firm grows, its very size inhibits further growth at the same rate.  Therefore, the investor risks not only overpaying for growth stocks, but also choosing the wrong ones.  In fact, the average growth fund does not fair much better than the indexes.  Also, growth stocks fluctuate widely in price over time, which introduces a speculative element.  The more enthusiastic the public becomes, the more speculative the stock becomes as its price rises in comparison to the firm’s earnings.

3.      Special Situations – This is a specialty field that includes workouts in bankruptcy and risk arbitrage arising from mergers and acquisitions.  However, since the 1970s, this field has become increasingly risky with available returns less than were previously realizable.  In addition, this field requires a special mentality as well as special equipment.  Thus, to the common investor, this area is highly speculative.

4.      Bargain Issues – This is the area in which the common investor has the enterprising investor has the greatest chance for long term success. 

The market often undervalues large companies undergoing short-term adversity.  The market also will undervalue small firms in similar circumstances.  Large firms generally possess the capital and intellectual resources necessary to carry the firm through adversity; plus, the market recognizes the recovery of large firms faster than it does for small firms.  Small firms are more likely to lose profitability that is never to be regained, and when earnings do improve, they may go unnoticed by the market.

One way to profit from this strategy is to purchase those issues of the DJIA that have either the highest dividend yields or the lowest earnings multiples.  The investment returns using this method should result in a return approximately 50% better than purchasing equal amounts of all 30 DJIA issues.   This is a sound starting point for the enterprising investor.

Caution must be paid not to purchase companies that are inherently speculative due to economic swings, such as the Big 3 automakers.  These firms have high prices and low multipliers in their good years, and low prices and high multipliers in their bad years.   When earnings are significantly low, the P/E is high to adjust for the underlying value of the firm during all economic periods.  To avoid this mistake, the stock selected should have a low price in reference to past average earnings.  

Bargain issues are defined as those that worth considerably more than their market price based upon a thorough analysis of the facts.  To be a true bargain, an issue’s price must be at least 50% below its real value.  This includes bonds and preferred stocks when they sell far under par. 

There are two ways to determine the true value of a stock.  Both methods rely upon estimating future earnings.  In the first method, the cumulative future earnings are discounted at an appropriate discount rate, or in the alternative, the earnings are multiplied by an appropriate p/e multiple.  In the second method, more attention is paid to the realizable value of the assets with particular emphasis on the net current assets or working capital.

During bear markets, many issues are bargains by this definition.  Courage to purchase these issues in depressed markets often is later vindicated.  In any case, bargains can be found in almost all market conditions (except for the highest) due to the market’s vagaries.  The market often makes mountains out of molehills.  In addition to currently disappointing results, a lack of interest also can cause an issue to plummet.

Many stocks, however, never recover.  Determining which stocks have temporary problems from those that have chronic woes is not easy.  Earnings should be proximately stable for a minimum of 10 years with no earnings deficit in any year.  In addition, the firm should have sufficient financial strength to meet future possible setbacks.  Ideally, the large and prominent company should be selling below both its average price and its past average price/earnings multiple.  This rule usually disqualifies from investment companies like Chrysler, whose low price years are accompanied by high price earnings ratios.  The Chrysler type of roller coaster is not a suitable investment activity.

The easiest value to recognize is one where the firm sells for the price of its net working capital after all long-term obligations.  This means that the buyer pays nothing for fixed assets like buildings and machinery.  In 1957, 150 common stocks were considered bargain issues.  Of these, 85 issues appeared in the S & P Monthly Guide.  The gain for these issues in two years was 75%, compared to 50% for the S & P industrials.  This constitutes a good investment operation.  During market advances bargain issues are difficult to find.    

Secondary issues, those that are not the largest firms in the most important industries, but that otherwise possess large market positions, may be purchased profitably under the conditions that follow.  Secondary issues should have a high dividend yield, their reinvested earnings should be substantial compared to their price, and the issues should purchased well below their market highs.  Regardless of the circumstance, purchasing a firm’s issue prior to its acquisition usually results in a realized gain for the investor.

            General Rules for Investment

            The aggressive investor must have a considerable knowledge of security values and must devote enough time to the pursuit as to consider it a business enterprise.   Those who place themselves in an intermediate category between defensive and aggressive are likely to produce only disappointment.  There is no middle ground.  Thus, a majority of security owners should position themselves as defensive investors who seek safety, simplicity, and satisfactory results. 

            As stated earlier, all investors should avoid purchase at full price of all foreign bonds, ordinary preferred stocks, and secondary issues.  “Full price” is defined to be the fair value of a common stock or the par value of a bond.

            Most secondary issues fluctuate below fair value and only surpass their value in the upper reaches of a bull market.  Thus, the only logic for owning common secondary issues is that they are purchased far below their worth to a private owner, that is, on a bargain basis.  In secondary companies, the average common share is worth much less to an outside investor than the share is worth to a controlling owner.  In any case, the distinction between a primary and secondary issue often is difficult to determine.

8.  Market Fluctuations

            Fluctuations of Common Stock Prices

Since common stocks are subject to wide price swings, the investor should seek to profit from these opportunities.  However, attempting to time the market usually ends in unsatisfactory results.  Graham believes that market timing is pure speculation and is not an investing activity.  The best an investor can do is the change the bond and stock proportions in his portfolio after major market swings. 

Formulas do not work, although they have been in vogue since the 1950s.  When the market reached new highs in the mid-1950s, many formula investors sold their equities according to formula only to witness the market grow increasingly higher.  Any approach to the market that is easily described is sure to fail (except for Graham’s method). 

The investor also can focus on the price of a security. Graham recommends this practice.  Short-term fluctuations should not matter.  Over a period of 5 years, the investor should not be surprised if the average value of his portfolio increases more than 50% from its low point or decreases 1/3 from its high point.

Market advances and declines tempt investors to make foolish decisions.  Varying the proportion of stocks and bonds between the 25%-75% ratio occupies an investor’s time during turbulent markets and prevents him from making gross errors in judgement.  The true investor takes comfort that his actions are opposite from the actions of the crowd.

The better a firm’s record and its prospects, the less relationship that its price will have to its book value.  The more successful the company, the more likely its share price is to fluctuate.  More often than not, a fast growing firm’s market price will exceed its intrinsic value.  So, the better the quality of the stock, the more speculative it will be.  This explains the erratic price behavior of some of the most successful and impressive enterprises, such as IBM and Xerox.

The investor should purchase issues close to their tangible asset values and at no more than 33% above that figure.  These purchases logically are related to a company’s balance sheet and not to its earnings.  Any premium over book value may be thought of as a fee for liquidity that accompanies any publicly traded stock.   

            Just because a stock sells at or below its net asset value does not warrant that it is a sound purchase.  In addition to below market values, the investor also must demand a strong financial position, a satisfactory p/e ratio, and an assurance that the firm’s earnings will be sustained over the years.  This is not an entirely difficult bill to fill except under dangerously high market conditions.  At the end of 1970 more than half of the DJIA met these investment criteria.  However, the investor will forgo the most brilliant, high growth prospects.

            With a portfolio purchased at close to book value, the investor can take a more detached view of market fluctuations.  In fact, so long as the earning power of the portfolio remains satisfactory, the investor can use these market vagaries to buy low and sell high.

As seen with the stock fluctuations of A & P over many years, the market often goes wrong.  Although the stock market may fall, a true investor is rarely forced to sell his shares.  Rather, the investor is free to disregard the market quotes.  Thus, the investor who allows himself to be unduly worried about the market transforms his basic advantage into a disadvantage.  In fact, the investor who owns common stock owns a piece of these companies as a private owner would, and a private owner would not sell his business when it is undervalued by the market.  A quoted stock provides an option for the investor to sell at a given price and nothing more.  The investor with a diversified portfolio of good stocks should neither worry about sizeable declines nor become excited about sizeable advances.   An investor never should sell a stock just because it has gone down or purchase it because it has gone up.

Graham provides the parable of “Mr. Market”, who like the stock market, quotes you a price for your shares each and every day.  Mr. Market will either buy your shares or sell you his.  The price will depend upon Mr. Market’s mood.  You can ignore his efforts, or you can take advantage of him when he quotes you a price that you believe is priced advantageously.  Finally, one should not forget the effect of management on a firm’s results.  Good management produces acceptable results and bad management does not.

Fluctuation of Bond Prices

            Short-term bonds, defined as those with a duration of less than 7 years, are not significantly affected by changes in the market.  This applies to US Savings Bonds, which can be redeemed at anytime.  Long term bonds, however, may experience wide price swings as a result of fluctuations in the interest rate.  Thus, long term bonds may seem attractive when discounted, but this practice often leads to speculation and losses.

Low yields correspond with high bond prices and vice versa; prices and yields are inversely related.  The period from 1960 to 1975 is marked by reversing swings in the price of bonds so much so that it reminded Graham of Newton’s law: “every action has an opposite and equal reaction.”  Of course, nothing on Wall Street actually occurs the same way twice. 

Graham acknowledges the impossibility of attempting to predict bond prices, even if common stock prices were predictable.  Therefore, the investor must choose between long- term and short-term bonds chiefly on the basis of personal preference.  If the investor wishes to ensure that his market values will not decrease, then the investor is best served by US Savings Bonds.  With higher yield long term bonds, the investor must be prepared to see their market values fluctuate. 

Convertible issues should be avoided.  Their prices fluctuate widely and unpredictably based upon the price of the underlying common stock, the credit standing of the firm, and the market interest rate.  Because convertible issues experience huge swings in market value, they are largely speculative investments.

Investing MBA.com 

"By far, the best book on investing ever written." - Warren Buffett

The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham






Preface to the Fourth Edition,
by Warren E. Buffett

I read the first edition of this book early in 1950, when I was nineteen. I thought then that it was by far the best book about investing ever written. I still think it is.

To invest successfully over a lifetime does not require a stratospheric IQ, unusual business insights, or inside information.  What’s needed is a sound intellectual framework for making decisions and the ability to keep emotions from corroding that framework.  This book precisely and clearly prescribes the proper framework. You must supply the emotional discipline.

If you follow the behavioral and business principles that Graham advocates—and if you pay special attention to the invaluable advice in Chapters 8 and 20—you will not get a poor result from your investments. (That represents more of an accomplishment than you might think.) Whether you achieve outstanding results will depend on the effort and intellect you apply to your investments, as well as on the amplitudes of stock-market folly that prevail during your investing career. The sillier the market’s behavior, the greater the opportunity for the business-like investor. Follow Graham and you will profit from folly rather than participate in it.

To me, Ben Graham was far more than an author or a teacher.  More than any other man except my father, he influenced my life.  Shortly after Ben’s death in 1976, I wrote the following short remembrance about him in the Financial Analysts Journal. As you read the book, I believe you’ll perceive some of the qualities I mentioned in this tribute.

BENJAMIN GRAHAM

1894–1976

Several years ago Ben Graham, then almost eighty, expressed to a friend the thought that he hoped every day to do “something foolish, something creative and something generous.”

The inclusion of that first whimsical goal reflected his knack for packaging ideas in a form that avoided any overtones of sermonizing or self-importance. Although his ideas were powerful, their delivery was unfailingly gentle.

Readers of this magazine need no elaboration of his achievements as measured by the standard of creativity. It is rare that the founder of a discipline does not find his work eclipsed in rather short order by successors.  But over forty years after publication of the book that brought structure and logic to a disorderly and confused activity, it is difficult to think of possible candidates for even the runner-up position in the field of security analysis. In an area where much looks foolish within weeks or months after publication, Ben’s principles have remained sound—their value often enhanced and better understood in the wake of financial storms that demolished flimsier intellectual structures. His counsel of soundness brought unfailing rewards to his followers—even to those with natural abilities inferior to more gifted practitioners who stumbled while following counsels of brilliance or fashion.

A remarkable aspect of Ben’s dominance of his professional field was that he achieved it without that narrowness of mental activity that concentrates all effort on a single end. It was, rather, the incidental by-product of an intellect whose breadth almost exceeded definition. Certainly I have never met anyone with a mind of similar scope. Virtually total recall, unending fascination with new knowledge, and an ability to recast it in a form applicable to seemingly unrelated problems made exposure to his thinking in any field a delight.

But his third imperative—generosity—was where he succeeded beyond all others. I knew Ben as my teacher, my employer, and my friend. In each relationship—just as with all his students, employees, and friends—there was an absolutely open-ended, no-scores-kept generosity of ideas, time, and spirit. If clarity of thinking was required, there was no better place to go. And if encouragement or counsel was needed, Ben was there.

Walter Lippmann spoke of men who plant trees that other men will sit under. Ben Graham was such a man.

Reprinted from the Financial Analysts Journal, November/December 1976.

How to Diagnose What’s Wrong With Your Business

January 18, 2012, 9:25 AM

By JAY GOLTZ

Over the years, I have met a lot of entrepreneurs who have been frustrated by low profits, lack of growth, or the stress of the never-ending demands. Many struggle with all three. While every business is different, there are common denominators. In fact, I believe there are 10. The tricky part is that failing to have a handle on just one of these areas can result in mediocre performance, a stressful existence, or ultimate and intimate failure. That is one reason the failure rate for small businesses is so high (here are some others).

This is the checklist I review when I’m not satisfied with my company’s performance.

Marketing

1. Targeting. Do you have a strategy to reach your best potential customers with your sales and marketing efforts? A shotgun approach is too expensive and inefficient for any company, especially a small one. What percentage of the people you approach actually buy a product or service like yours?

2. Advertising and Public Relations. There are many choices for where to place an ad and how to execute a public relations campaign. The problem with many small businesses is that their marketing activities are driven primarily by which salespeople happen to call on them. Ineffective advertising or public relations can be not only a tremendous waste of money but a tremendous waste of opportunity. If you are doing things the same way you did them 10 years ago, you are probably getting less response.

3. The Message. Lots of companies still use this line: “We will exceed your expectations.” I even saw it on the back of an ambulance. (I don’t know about you, but I have pretty high expectations when I call an ambulance! Are the technicians going to give me a haircut after they bring me back to life?) It was a good line when someone first thought of it. Now, it is old. It is tired. It needs to retire. You need to exceed people’s expectations by coming up with your own line. Maybe it is not a line at all. Maybe it is a message. Whatever it is, it should say something about your company that means something to potential customers.

Management

4. Hiring. I can’t think of anything more important than hiring the right people. Great hiring is a skill, one that frequently is not the strong suit of the typical entrepreneur. Do you have a hiring process? Hiring by trial and error is a very expensive and painful way to build a staff. I have found that hiring the right people is 75 percent of management. What percentage of the people you hire work out great? It should be 80 percent or 90 percent, and perhaps less in a low-wage environment.

5. Firing. This is never a popular subject, and it’s especially uncomfortable these days. But it is a harsh reality of business that some people are just not suited for some jobs. Many bosses avoid firing at all costs, including going broke, because they want to see themselves as being “nice.” In reality, customers and other employees just see them as irresponsible. Here is a simple test: Are there people who work for you who you would be relieved to have come in tomorrow and quit? If the answer is yes, that is not a good sign. Especially if the employee is a relative.

6. Operations. Training, standards, support, recognition, systems, key performance indicators, follow-up, etc. Is your company getting the job done? Are customers happy? Do you know? How is employee turnover? Are employees happy? Would they tell you if they weren’t? Do you have people who tell you the truth? Do you yell? (I know. You’re passionate.) Have good people left your company for more money? That is frequently an indication of other problems.

Accounting and Finance

7. Basic Accounting. Many seemingly successful companies have gotten into big trouble by neglecting accounting until it is too late. Accounting is not just about paying taxes. It is about information, insight, and control. Great accounting will not make a business successful, but bad accounting can destroy a business. Is someone staying on top of receivables, being careful about opening new accounts and making sure the existing ones are current? Could you walk someone through your financial statements and explain each part?

8. Pricing. This is probably the sleeper on this list. I can’t tell you how many times I have seen entrepreneurs either put themselves out of business, or never make the money they should have, because of bad pricing models. They charge prices that bear no relation to the costs or to the value proposition. This is just one of the reasons a company needs accurate accounting — so it can determine the true cost of a product or service. Do your salespeople have control of the pricing for jobs that they quote? If so, are they selling at a price that allows you to make a profit?

9. Financing. Most businesses need some kind of financing. Whether it comes from investors, banks, credit unions, factoring or even credit cards, there is a lot to know and understand. This is another place where a good accountant can be of great help. Or not. If you have one of the many accountants who just do tax returns and are not really experienced at helping businesses grow, you can find lots of information in books and online. Or you can hire a better accountant. Here is a test: Do you know your debt-to-equity ratio?

Leadership

10. Any one of these topics could fill a book, and leadership is no exception. Let me count the ways: vision, direction, inspiration, support. It is similar to management, but they are not the same thing. As my company has gotten larger, I have found that leadership gets easier because I now have managers managing. When a company is smaller, the boss has to manage and lead. One minute you are writing someone up for violating the late policy, and the next you are trying to inspire the troops. Perhaps management is pushing, and leadership is pulling. It’s not easy doing both at the same time.

Whether you score well or poorly on this list, keep in mind that it is an ongoing struggle. Personally, I’ve been doing this for 30 years, and I can assure you that I am constantly wrestling with almost every item on the list.

So how did you do?

Jay Goltz owns five small businesses in Chicago.

Margin of Safety Concept in The Business Venture of Making Profits from Security Purchases and Sales

To Sum Up

Investment is most intelligent when it is most businesslike. It is amazing to see how many capable businessmen try to operate in Wall Street with complete disregard of all the sound principles through which they have gained success in their own undertakings.

Yet every corporate security may best be viewed, in the first instance, as an ownership interest in, or a claim against, a specific business enterprise. And if a person sets out to make profits from security purchases and sales, he is embarking on a business venture of his own, which must be run in accordance with accepted business principles if it is to have a chance of success.

The first and most obvious of these principles is, “Know what you are doing—know your business.” For the investor this means: Do not try to make “business profits” out of securities—that is, returns in excess of normal interest and dividend income—unless you know as much about security values as you would need to know about the value of merchandise that you proposed to manufacture or deal in.

A second business principle: “Do not let anyone else run your business, unless (1) you can supervise his performance with adequate care and comprehension or (2) you have unusually strong reasons for placing implicit confidence in his integrity and ability.” For the investor this rule should determine the conditions under which he will permit someone else to decide what is done with his money.

A third business principle: “Do not enter upon an operation— that is, manufacturing or trading in an item—unless a reliable calculation shows that it has a fair chance to yield a reasonable profit.  In particular, keep away from ventures in which you have little to gain and much to lose.” For the enterprising investor this means that his operations for profit should be based not on optimism but on arithmetic. For every investor it means that when he limits his return to a small figure—as formerly, at least, in a conventional bond or preferred stock—he must demand convincing evidence that he is not risking a substantial part of his principal.

A fourth business rule is more positive: “Have the courage of your knowledge and experience. If you have formed a conclusion from the facts and if you know your judgment is sound, act on it—even though others may hesitate or differ.” (You are neither right nor wrong because the crowd disagrees with you. You are right because your data and reasoning are right.) Similarly, in the world of securities, courage becomes the supreme virtue after adequate knowledge and a tested judgment are at hand.

Fortunately for the typical investor, it is by no means necessary for his success that he bring these qualities to bear upon his program—provided he limits his ambition to his capacity and confines his activities within the safe and narrow path of standard, defensive investment. To achieve satisfactory investment results is easier than most people realize; to achieve superior results is harder than it looks.


Ref:  The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham

CHAPTER 20  “Margin of Safety” as the Central Concept of Investment

Also read:

• Margin of Safety Concept in The Business Venture of Buying and Selling Stocks
• Margin of Safety Concept in Conventional and Unconventional Investments
• Margin of Safety Concept in Speculation and Investment
• Margin of Safety Concept in Diversification
• Margin of Safety Concept in Undervalued or Bargain Stockss
• Margin of Safety Concept in Growth Stocks
• Margin of Safety in Good-Quality and Low-Quality Stocks.
• Margin of Safety Concept in Common Stocks
• Margin of Safety Concept in Bonds and Preferred Stocks