Friday 6 July 2012

Three central banks take action in sign of alarm


Arrangement of various world currencies including Chinese Yuan, US Dollar, Euro, British Pound, pictured in Warsaw, January 25, 2011 REUTERS/Kacper Pempel
Arrangement of various world currencies including Chinese Yuan, US Dollar, Euro, British Pound, pictured in Warsaw, January 25, 2011
Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel
BEIJING/FRANKFURT | Thu Jul 5, 2012 8:30pm BST
(Reuters) - China, the euro zone and Britain loosened monetary policy in the space of less than an hour on Thursday, signalling a growing level of alarm about the world economy, although suggestions of coordinated action were played down.
Of the three, the surprise move was from Beijing which lowered its lending rate by 31 basis points to 6 percent following an interest rate cut just a month ago that also came out of the blue.
The European Central Bank cut rates to a record low 0.75 percent following a dire run of economic data. But it steered clear of bolder moves such as reviving its government bond-buying programme or flooding banks with more long-term liquidity.
Still, a Reuters poll found the ECB is expected to follow the rate cut with more steps to help the region's economy in coming months.
The Bank of England, whose rates are already at a record low 0.5 percent, said it would restart its printing presses and buy 50 billion pounds ($78 billion) of assets with newly created money to help the economy out of recession.
"It is a surprise that they are moving so quickly. It shows that policymakers' concerns about the global economy have only grown," Mark Williams, an economist at Capital Economics in London, said of the People's Bank of China's action.
A raft of Chinese data is due next week, including second-quarter gross domestic product that officials may know to be poor, he said. But they may also be trying to foster suggestions of acting in concert.
"Policymakers may have felt that cutting rates on the day that the ECB (did) the same would deliver a bigger impact, encouraging talk of a coordinated response to the slowdown in the global economy," Williams said. "Again, though, this might simply underline the seriousness of the downside risks."
"NO COORDINATION"
In Frankfurt, ECB President Mario Draghi denied any globally coordinated central bank action of the sort seen after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008.
"On coordination, no, there wasn't any ... that went beyond the normal exchange of views on the state of the business cycle, on the state of the economy, and on the state of global demand," he told a news conference.
Asked if conditions were now as bad as they were in late 2008 when the world's financial system was teetering, Draghi replied: "Definitely not."
The action puts even more focus on what the U.S. Federal Reserve will do when it holds its next meeting on July 31 and August 1. The Bank of Japan meets next week.
Last month, the Fed held off on another round of bond-buying but its chief, Ben Bernanke, said there was "considerable scope to do more" and Wall Street bond firms polled by Reuters saw a 50 percent chance of another asset purchase programme.
Some encouraging data on the labour market on Thursday tempered anticipation the central bank could undertake a third round of bond purchases, known as quantitative easing or QE3.
But more weight will be given to Friday's nonfarm payrolls report, which is expected to show job growth picked up in June but still remained tepid at 90,000 jobs.
"If we get a couple of more bad jobs reports, (the Fed) will come in with more stimulus. Today's reports suggest they might hold off, but they will want to see more data before they decide," said John Canally, economist and investment strategist at LPL Financial in Boston.
In recent weeks, economic evidence from Asia, Europe and the United States has pointed to a world economy running out of steam.
WILL IT WORK?
All the major central banks, with interest rates at historic lows, face the law of diminishing returns.
The Bank had already created 325 billion pounds of new money before Thursday's addition. In doing so, it has successfully driven borrowing costs to all-time lows, yet the UK economy is languishing in recession.
"The BoE has been excessively optimistic about how powerful QE is," said Philip Rush, an economist at Nomura, referring to the money-creating strategies known as qualitative easing.
"The latest increase is more than just a token, but it is not hugely significant for the outlook for growth and inflation."
A poll conducted by Reuters found 27 out of 47 economists believe the central bank will stop at the announced 375 billion pounds in total. A minority said the Bank would do more, with a few still calling for as much as 500 billion.
The euro zone is no better off. "We see now a weakening basically of growth in the whole of the euro area, including the country or the countries that had not experienced that before," Draghi said.
Policymakers could counter that things would be much worse if they had not acted, but with most monetary policy levers already pulled, government action is also required to improve the world's fortunes.
The International Monetary Fund has urged the United States to quickly remove the uncertainty over the path of fiscal policy, which is set to tighten abruptly at the start of next year without congressional action.
Measures announced at a European summit last week bought some calm to the euro zone debt crisis with the promise of action to lower government borrowing costs, but economists say they did not tackle the root problems.
The ECB continues to put the onus on euro zone governments to solve their debt crisis and did not even discuss on Thursday "non-standard" measures such as buying Spanish and Italian bonds to lower borrowing costs which are not sustainable indefinitely.
Elsewhere, Denmark's central bank cut interest rates by 25 basis points, shadowing the ECB's action, in a historic move that put one of its secondary rates into negative territory for the first time. Kenya ended its nine-months-long hawkish stance with a bigger-than-expected 150 basis points rate cut. ($1 = 0.6419 British pounds)
(Writing by Mike Peacock, reporting by Reuters bureaus; Editing by Peter Graff and Leslie Gevirtz)


Ailing Britain's central bank turns money taps back on. Quantitative Easing 3.


Pedestrians pass The Bank of England in the City of London February 14, 2012. REUTERS/Olivia Harris
Pedestrians pass The Bank of England in the City of London February 14, 2012.
Credit: Reuters/Olivia Harris
LONDON | Thu Jul 5, 2012 3:54pm BST
(Reuters) - The Bank of England launched a third round of monetary stimulus on Thursday, saying it would restart its printing presses and buy 50 billion pounds of government bonds with newly created money to help the economy out of recession.
The BoE's action, coming just two months after it ended a previous asset buying programme, coincided with interest rate cuts in China and the euro zone as the trio of central banks took steps to counter a global economic slowdown.
There is no guarantee the new cash injection, which the bank linked directly to the worsening backdrop in the euro zone, will offer a major boost to an economy officially in recession since late last year.
BoE Governor Mervyn King has been adamant that gilt purchases still work as a stimulus.
But policymakers Martin Weale and deputy governor Paul Tucker as well as external economists have voiced doubts about the effectiveness of the latest round of purchases, though some in the market still forecast the four-month programme would be extended.
"We continue to have doubts over how successful extra QE will be, but seeing as the BoE has few other options we expect them to stick with it," said James Knightley at ING.
The BoE bought 125 billion pounds of gilts between October and April, calling a halt in May largely because inflation was falling more slowly than hoped towards its 2 percent target.
Since then, inflation has dropped to 2.8 percent, and the BoE said a worsening economic situation in the euro zone was the main factor behind its decision to restart purchases.
"Without additional monetary stimulus, it was more likely than not that inflation would undershoot the target in the medium term," King said in a letter to finance minister George Osborne explaining the decision.
The BoE has bought 325 billion pounds of government bonds to date, and the purchases announced on Thursday take this total to 375 billion.
Many economists had expected new programme to be spread over less than four months, and a minority had forecast the BoE would plan to buy 75 billion pounds of bonds.
Gilt futures, which had rallied in the run-up to the decision, fell by more than 30 ticks to hit a session low after the data.
"We continue to expect that QE will be expanded markedly further over time, reaching a total of about 500 billion pounds," said Citi economist Michael Saunders, who had expected an initial dose of 75 billion.
MONETARY POLICY STILL KEY
Britain's Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition is largely reliant on the BoE to boost the economy because it has limited scope to cut taxes or raise spending while it tries to eliminate the country's big budget deficit over the next five years.
In a letter authorising Thursday's QE expansion, finance minister Osborne confirmed that monetary policy was the "primary tool" to deal with a worsening economic outlook.
However, many economists think gilt purchases are losing the effectiveness they had when they first started in March 2009.
"The BoE has been excessively optimistic about how powerful QE is," said Philip Rush, an economist at Nomura. "The latest increase is more than just a token, but it is not hugely significant for the outlook for growth and inflation."
Some BoE Monetary Policy Committee members have doubts too, and recommended at last month's meeting - when the committee split 5-4 against restarting QE - that other complementary policy measures might be better suited to reducing firms' and households' borrowing costs.
The QE stimulus follows joint measures announced by the government and BoE last month to improve the flow of credit to businesses, and to ensure banks do not suffer from a lack of ready cash if the euro zone crisis deepens.
The BoE says its purchases of government bonds help the economy by encouraging other investors to buy riskier assets instead, making it easier for large companies to raise funds through bond or share issues. But critics argue the BoE needs to do more to boost the flow of credit to smaller companies.
"The last round of QE proved ineffective, with little or no evidence it found its way to small businesses - the engine room of our economy," said Phillip Monks, chief executive of Aldermore, a recently established bank that lends to business.
"To really stimulate economic growth, the Bank of England needs to do more to ... ease credit availability for small firms."
With the possibility of interest rate cuts yet to enter the debate in Britain, both the European Central Bank and the People's Bank of China cut borrowing costs on Thursday.

Thursday 5 July 2012

A UK Blue-Chip Starter Portfolio


Company
Industry
Share Price (Pence)
P/E
Yield (%)
HSBCFinancials5619.05.2
Royal Dutch ShellOil & Gas2,2257.65.0
BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT.L  )Basic Materials1,8067.64.3
British American TobaccoConsumer Goods3,24214.64.5
Tesco (LSE: TSCO.L  )Consumer Services3108.85.0
GlaxoSmithKlineHealth Care1,44711.45.3
Vodafone (LSE: VOD.L  )Telecommunications17910.97.4
Rolls-RoyceIndustrials85814.22.4
National GridUtilities67612.46.1
ARM HoldingsTechnology50632.20.9

Excluding tech share ARM, the companies have an average P/E of 10.7 and an average yield of 5.0%. The numbers were 9.8 and 5.2%, respectively, when I last carried out this exercise in October 2011.
So, the group is rated a bit more highly today than it was nine months ago. However, I think it still veers towards the value end of the spectrum, because my rule of thumb for this group of nine is that an average P/E below 10 is firmly in "good value" territory, while a P/E above 14 starts to move toward expensive.


Wednesday 4 July 2012

Profits for the Long Run: Affirming the Case for Quality

Buying shares in decent, profitable businesses is a good way of minimising risk, and thereby maximising overall investing returns over the long run.

Chuck Joyce and Kimball Mayer:
"Put simply, profitability is the ultimate source of investment returns. [And] contrary to popular belief, profitability can be forecasted, and superior profitability persists. Investors systematically undervalue the unexciting stability of [such] quality stocks, except during times of financial crisis. Rather than being beholden to some black box model... we would argue that a fundamental focus on profitability remains the best way to minimize the true risk with which investors should be concerned."

Read more here:  Profits for the Long: Affirming the Case for Quality

With the passing of time, the benefi ts of low-risk investing have become more widely accepted.  Today, a wide array of low-risk strategies is now available.  


From profits, come dividends. And from dividends, come investors' incomes.


The market tends to mis-price such companies, seeing them as dull dividend machines, when it should be valuing them as dull, safe dividend machines.


Read more here: http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2012/06/12/profits-for-the-long-run.aspx

From profits, come dividends. And from dividends, come investors' incomes.


When looking at companies such as British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS),GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK), SSE (LSE: SSE) and Diageo (LSE: DGE), the market is looking at the incoming stream, but placing insufficient value on its dependability.
Better still, the market tends to mis-price such companies, seeing them as dull dividend machines, when it should be valuing them as dull, safe dividend machines.

Sage perspective

Warren Buffett, of course, is another investor with an eye for such businesses. If his well-known "economic moat" isn't another way of saying "businesses with high long-run sustainable profitability" then I don't know what is.

3 Reasons To Buy Into The Market Today

29 June 2012

This market is a buy. Here's why.

The stock market, it's fair to say, is in an uncertain mood. And, as in the early days of 2009, just before the market's nadir, daily items of news are having a disproportionate effect on sentiment.
The economy, Greece, banking downgrades, American purchasing and housing surveys -- you name it, and stock prices are reacting, oscillating wildly on euphoria and gloom.
At such times, it's tempting to sit it out, and wait for calmer times before putting more money into market. But that, I think, would be a mistake.
Here's why.

Pessimism abounds

Let's start with why the market is reacting to newsflow, and not shrugging it off. Simply put, investors today are far more pessimistic than they were earlier in the year, when the FTSE 100 (UKX) was within a few points of 6,000.
And pessimistic markets, in short, are buying opportunities. As Benjamin Graham put it: "Buy when most people -- including experts -- are pessimistic, and sell when they are actively optimistic." Or, to cite that other well-known super-investor, Warren Buffett: "Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."
Can the market get more pessimistic still? Undoubtedly. Can people get even more fearful? Of course. But with the market down 10-15%, you can buy today the same shares that you were buying just weeks ago -- but significantly more cheaply.
And as Warren Buffett -- again! -- so memorably put it in a thoughtful article in Fortune magazine a few years back:
"When hamburgers go down in price, we sing the Hallelujah Chorus in the Buffett household. When hamburgers go up, we weep. For most people, it's the same way with everything in life they will be buying ‑‑ except stocks. When stocks go down and you can get more for your money, people don't like them any more."
And unquestionably, the stock market's hamburgers have just gone down in price. AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN), Aviva (LSE: AV), BT (LSE: BT-A), BAE Systems (LSE: BA), Barclays (LSE: BARC) andLloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) -- undeniably, Britain's blue chips have gone on sale.
That said, only some of those particular blue chips are rated as a 'buy' by Neil Woodford, the subject of a recent special free Motley Fool report: "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". And others in that short list above, it's fair to say, he wouldn't touch at all.
Which are which? Why not download the report, and find out? As I say, it's free.

Asset class perspective

That said, it's possible to view today's market in a very different light. Namely, this way: if you don't like shares at today's prices, what do you like?
Cash? Real returns are either negative or zero -- and the next move in interest rates is likely to be downwards. Property? You're braver than I am. Gilts? Every bubble has to burst one day -- and we're surely in a gilt bubble. And so on.
On the other hand, decent blue chips are on yields of 5% or so, delivering dividend growth of 5-10%, and offer capital growth into the bargain.
And, what's more, at very reasonable prices. The FTSE 100's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio yesterday was 9.88, compared to 10 years ago when it was 19.88 -- and that, in short, is one helluva difference in valuation.

Watch-list wonders

Frankly, there's not much point in having a watch list if all you do is, well, watch it.
Or, to put it another way: "When shares on my watch list scream 'bargain', I buy them. What do youdo, Sir?," as master investor and economist John Maynard Keynes so memorably didn't quite say.
And with those sentiments in mind, there's one share in particular that I've been loading up on in recent times, having almost doubled my holding this year. What's more, I'll be buying still more of it in mid-July, when I've banked my dividends from Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY), Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS),GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) and BP (LSE: BP), and found some more spare cash.
Its name? You can find that out in another free special report from the Motley Fool -- "The One UK Share Warren Buffett Loves". But from the way that Buffett has seemingly been topping up himself in recent times, it's clear that the share is on his watch list, too. The report is free, so why not download a copy now?

Your view?

Of course, not everyone will agree with me. Some of you, as you've explained before, in comments appended to articles like this, are rather keener on property than I am.
But with the FTSE 100 on a P/E below 10, real interest rates largely negative and a wobbly housing market, that's the world as I see it. Comments?


http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2012/06/29/3-reasons-to-buy-into-the-market-today.aspx


Some of the Sage's less well-known sayings are perfect advice for times like these.


Published on 24 May 2012

Without doubt, Warren Buffett, the boss of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B.US), has said some very smart things. Which, when you think about it, isn't surprising.
Because he wouldn't have made so much money in the first place if he wasn't smart, and -- let's face it -- he's a gregarious chap who's very happy to share his thoughts with those investors who have put their money into Berkshire Hathaway.
At this year's investor-fest in Omaha, for instance, Buffett and co-investor Charlie Munger once again held the stage for several hours, fielding questions from all and sundry.

Sage words

The trouble is, when it comes to the answers, many of us have selective hearing. One result of this is that some of his best known quotes are only partly reproduced.
Take, for instance, Buffett's famous remark that "our favourite holding period is forever". What it doesn'tmean is cling like a dog with a bone to the dross in your portfolio. Because Buffett can, and does, sell.
The full quote is this: "When we own portions of outstanding businesses with outstanding managements, our favourite holding period is forever."
And that, I think you'll agree, is a rather different proposition.
Another problem, frankly, is wishful thinking. Personally, I think that this famous quote is one of his worst quotations, devoid as it is of anything that an investor can actually do or influence: "Rule No. 1: never lose money; rule No. 2: don't forget rule No. 1."
What does it mean? What are you actually supposed to take away from it? It might be a worthy aspiration, but it certainly isn't actionable advice.

Cometh the hour

But, interestingly, it turns out that three of his less well-known quotes are loaded with actionable advice. And it's advice, what's more, that plays perfectly to today's turbulent and nervous markets.
And without further ado, here they are:
  • "The best thing that happens to us is when a great company gets into temporary trouble... We want to buy them when they're on the operating table."
  • "The most common cause of low prices is pessimism -- sometimes pervasive, sometimes specific to a company or industry. We want to do business in such an environment, not because we like pessimism, but because we like the prices it produces."
  • "The stock market is a no‑called‑strike game. You don't have to swing at everything -- you can wait for your pitch. The problem when you're a money manager is that your fans keep yelling, 'Swing, you bum!'"
The common refrain running through all three? It's perhaps best summarised by yet another Buffett quote: "You pay a high price for a cheery consensus."
In short, you'll make the most money by sitting on your hands in the good times, and then buying good businesses in the bad times.
And if that doesn't sound like a recipe for success in today's turbulent times, I don't know what does.

Wired for failure

Now, human nature being what it is, many investors do the exact opposite.
When they're feeling buoyant and bullish, they pile in to the stock market. Look no further than 1996-1999, for instance. Or 2005-2006.
Then, when stock markets crater, they sell -- as they did in 2008 and 2009, to choose another example.
And they certainly don't buy when the market is at rock bottom. Which led to an awful lot of investors getting caught out by the meteoric rise of the FTSE 100 in the months that followed March 2009.

Looking for bargains

Hopefully, you'll already have your eyes on stocks priced at bargain levels.
Personally, I'm looking at topping up my holdings in BP (LSE: BP), BAE Systems (LSE: BA) and GKN(LSE: GKN). The news surrounding the first two, in particular, is gloomy. But the basic businesses are sound.
Or I may just throw some money at the index, via one of my tracker funds, or via Vanguard's new low-cost FTSE 100 ETF, the Vanguard FTSE 100 ETF (LSE: VUKE) -- which is now live and trading, by the way.
That's just me, of course. But if you'd like to know what Warren Buffett himself has loaded up on, then a free Motley Fool special report -- "The One UK Share Warren Buffett Loves" -- can be in your inbox in seconds.

5 Stocks With Staying Power

By Motley Fool Staff July 3, 2012

Some press comments I read over the weekend suggested -- gasp! -- that readers ought to think about putting money in the stock market. Over the long term, ran the logic, the market looked set to outperform bank accounts, mattresses, gilts, and property.
Such sentiments aren't novel, of course. Just the other day, I pointed out three reasons to buy into the market today. But such a stance does pose an obvious question, especially for the novice investor.
Namely, which shares offer long-term staying power?
Go the distanceSo here, I offer up five stocks for the long haul: five decent businesses, with decent Warren Buffett-style "moats," decent histories of long-term dividend growth -- and very reasonable prices.
Better still, they're all large-cap companies, thereby offering robustness and resilience against the inevitable uncertainties that lie in the future. Three, in fact, are in the top 10 FTSE 100 stocks -- and all five of them make the top 20.
And I make no apology for another feature that they all share: a high exposure to consumer non-discretionary expenditure. With the consumer contributing about 65% to GDP, stocks reliant on captive consumer expenditure provide a good buffer of insurance against the business cycle.
But before diving into the financials, let's start with a quick "pen picture" of each company.
Five for the futureFirst up is GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK.L  ) , which employs around 97,000 people in more than 100 countries. Every minute, apparently, more than 1,100 prescriptions are written for GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceutical products. Almost as attractive is its strong range of consumer-friendly brands: Ribena, Horlicks, Lucozade, Aquafresh, Sensodyne, and the Macleans range of toothpaste, mouthwash and toothbrushes.
Next comes Vodafone (LSE: VOD.L  ) , the world's second‑largest mobile telecommunications company measured by both subscribers and 2011 revenues, which has 390 million customers, employs more than 83,000 people, and operates in more than 30 countries across five continents.
Third comes British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS.L  ) , the world's second-largest quoted tobacco group by global market share, possessing 200 brands sold in around 180markets, and with 46 cigarette factories in 39 countries manufacturing the cigarettes chosen by one in eight of the world's 1 billion adult smokers.
Fourth, we have Unilever (LSE: ULVR.L  ) , which employs 167,000 people, sells its products in 180 countries, and has a clutch of best-selling brands as diverse as Flora, Dove, PG Tips, Marmite, Persil, Knorr, Ben & Jerry's and Colman's.
Lastly, consider 500,000-employee Tesco (LSE: TSCO.L  ) , which is the world's third-largest international retailer, with fully a third of its sales coming from overseas, and spread over 13 countries. Throw in innovative home shopping, finance, and telecommunications offerings, and Tesco is more than just another grocer.
Let's see the numbersThose are the five businesses. Each, clearly, is large and diversified, with a solid consumer-centric go-to-market proposition.
But how do the finances stack up? Let's take a look. The table gives the lowdown.
Company
Share Price (Pence)
Market Cap (Pounds)
Forecasted P/E
Forecasted Yield
GlaxoSmithKline1,45873.7 billion11.95.1%
Vodafone17887.7 billion117.2%
British American Tobacco3,26563.8 billion15.54.2%
Unilever2,14860.6 billion16.43.7%
Tesco31325.1 billion8.94.9%
Now, it's fair to say that not all of these shares tick the usual "screamingly cheap" boxes. All but one is rated at above the FTSE 100's average price-to-earnings ratio, for instance -- although generally not hugely above it. That said, all but one offers yields that are above the FTSE 100's average.
But in any case, for the most part these aren't shares selected because adversity has temporarily driven down their prices: These are shares chosen to be solid picks over the long term.
In short, they're buy-and-forget shares that will deliver a decent total return stretching into the future. And on that basis, it's a matter of "price is what you pay, staying power is what you get."\