Theta, also called time decay, measures the rate of change in the price of a warrant as its maturity is running short while all other things being equal.
It can be expressed as an absolute value or a percentage relative to the warrant price (theta / warrant price).
Unless in some special circumstances, the value of theta is usually negative, reflecting the declining value of a warrant as time passes.
Depicted in a chart form, the slope of the curve of time value becomes steeper as the warrant gets closer to its maturity.
This shows that time decay accelerates as time passes.
Additional notes:
In percentage terms, time value has the biggest impact on out of the money (OTM) warrants.
The value of a warrant consists of intrinsic value and time value.
They vary in absolute and relative terms for warrants with different strike prices and maturity dates.
In the case of OTM warrants, their intrinsic values are negligible.
In other words, time value makes up most of their values.
Hence, they are more sensitive to the passage of time.
As for in the money (ITM) warrants, given that a large part of their value is made up of intrinsic value, they are less sensitive to the passage of time, and such sensitivity decreases as the maturity date gets nearer.
Keep INVESTING Simple and Safe (KISS) ****Investment Philosophy, Strategy and various Valuation Methods**** The same forces that bring risk into investing in the stock market also make possible the large gains many investors enjoy. It’s true that the fluctuations in the market make for losses as well as gains but if you have a proven strategy and stick with it over the long term you will be a winner!****Warren Buffett: Rule No. 1 - Never lose money. Rule No. 2 - Never forget Rule No. 1.
Friday, 11 September 2015
Warrants: Effective Gearing versus Gearing
The biggest appeal of warrant trading lies in the leverage effect.
Investors only need to invest a small sum to earn a potential return close to or even higher than that from directly investing in the underlying.
Gearing
Gearing only reflects how many times the underlying costs versus the warrant.
Its calculation formula is:
Gearing = Underlying Price / (Warrant Price x Conversion Ratio)
Effective Gearing
However, the rate of increase/decrease in the warrant price relative to the underlying price is not the same as gearing.
To estimate the increase/decrease in the warrant price relative to the underlying price, we should look to the effective gearing.
Effective gearing reflects the relationship between changes in the warrant price and in the underlying price.
Its calculation formula is:
Effective Gearing = Gearing x Delta
For example, the effective gearing of a warrant is 10 times, then, other things being equal, for every 1% change in the underlying price, the warrant price will in theory move by 10%.
Put simply, delta measures how much, in theory, the warrant price will move for a $1 change in the underlying price.
When you invest in warrants, you should look to their effective gearing, not gearing, as a reference for their risk/return performance.
Investors only need to invest a small sum to earn a potential return close to or even higher than that from directly investing in the underlying.
Gearing
Gearing only reflects how many times the underlying costs versus the warrant.
Its calculation formula is:
Gearing = Underlying Price / (Warrant Price x Conversion Ratio)
Effective Gearing
However, the rate of increase/decrease in the warrant price relative to the underlying price is not the same as gearing.
To estimate the increase/decrease in the warrant price relative to the underlying price, we should look to the effective gearing.
Effective gearing reflects the relationship between changes in the warrant price and in the underlying price.
Its calculation formula is:
Effective Gearing = Gearing x Delta
For example, the effective gearing of a warrant is 10 times, then, other things being equal, for every 1% change in the underlying price, the warrant price will in theory move by 10%.
Put simply, delta measures how much, in theory, the warrant price will move for a $1 change in the underlying price.
When you invest in warrants, you should look to their effective gearing, not gearing, as a reference for their risk/return performance.
Warrants: Days to Maturity
Warrants can be classified accordingly to the length of their remaining days to maturity.
Short term warrant: Warrant with less than 3 months to maturity
Medium term warrant: Warrants with 3 to 6 months left to maturity
Long term warrant: Warrants with more than 6 months running to maturity.
Whether it is long-term or short-term, ITM or OTM, a warrant is after all a leveraged investment instrument.
Be cautious in funds allocation and stop-loss arrangements.
Do not get carried away by the potential return without considering your risk tolerance.
For example:
A general investor may consider a medium-term warrant with around 3 months running to maturity and a strike price around 5% above or below the underlying price.
More aggressive investors may go for OTM warrants with a shorter maturity.
For conservative investors, they may choose ITM warrants with a longer maturity.
The warrant price tends to be positively related to the length of maturity.
In theory, the longer the maturity, the more room for changes in the underlying price will be.
Given the greater chance for the warrant to be exercised, the warrant price will tend to be higher.
No matter for call warrants or put warrants, the warrant price tends to be positively related to the length of maturity.
Besides, a warrant expiring in 6 months is less affected by time decay than one expiring in 3 months.
Warrants with a longer maturity will see their time values fall slower, while those with a shorter maturity will see their time values fall faster.
Short term warrant: Warrant with less than 3 months to maturity
Medium term warrant: Warrants with 3 to 6 months left to maturity
Long term warrant: Warrants with more than 6 months running to maturity.
Whether it is long-term or short-term, ITM or OTM, a warrant is after all a leveraged investment instrument.
Be cautious in funds allocation and stop-loss arrangements.
Do not get carried away by the potential return without considering your risk tolerance.
For example:
A general investor may consider a medium-term warrant with around 3 months running to maturity and a strike price around 5% above or below the underlying price.
More aggressive investors may go for OTM warrants with a shorter maturity.
For conservative investors, they may choose ITM warrants with a longer maturity.
The warrant price tends to be positively related to the length of maturity.
In theory, the longer the maturity, the more room for changes in the underlying price will be.
Given the greater chance for the warrant to be exercised, the warrant price will tend to be higher.
No matter for call warrants or put warrants, the warrant price tends to be positively related to the length of maturity.
Besides, a warrant expiring in 6 months is less affected by time decay than one expiring in 3 months.
Warrants with a longer maturity will see their time values fall slower, while those with a shorter maturity will see their time values fall faster.
Thursday, 10 September 2015
Deep in the money (deep ITM) and far out of the money (far OTM) warrants
If we take into account the extent of difference between the strike price and the underlying price, warrants can be further classified into:
ITM
deep ITM
OTM and
far OTM.
Generally, where there is a 15% or above difference between the strike price and the underlying price, a warrant will be considered far OTM or deep ITM.
However, this 15% mark is merely a rough idea, not an absolute threshold.
One must also look in the volatitlity of the underlying.
Some warrants may be considered deep ITM or far OTM even if the difference between strike price and the underlying price is only 10% or more.
ITM
deep ITM
OTM and
far OTM.
Generally, where there is a 15% or above difference between the strike price and the underlying price, a warrant will be considered far OTM or deep ITM.
However, this 15% mark is merely a rough idea, not an absolute threshold.
One must also look in the volatitlity of the underlying.
Some warrants may be considered deep ITM or far OTM even if the difference between strike price and the underlying price is only 10% or more.
Warrants - In the money, at the money and out of the money
A warrant is described as in-the-money (ITM), at-the-money (ATM) or out-of-the-money (OTM), depending on the relationship between its strike price and its underlying price.
A call warrant is OTM when its strike price is higher than its underlying price.
It is ITM, when its strike price is lower than its underlying price.
The situation is just the opposite for put warrants.
When its strike price is higher than its underlying price, a put warrant is ITM; and when its strike price is lower than its underlying price, it is OTM.
No matter it is a call or put, if the strike price is equal to the underlying price, the warrant is said to be ATM.
Summary
Call Warrant
ITM Strike Price < Underlying Price
ATM Strike Price = Underlying Price
OTM Strike Price > Underlying Price
Put Warrant
ITM Strike Price > Underlying Price
ATM Strike Price = Underlying Price
OTM Strike Price < Underlying Price
Additional Notes
Call Warrant
An investor can buy a call warrant if he is optimistic about the outlook for its underlying.
When the underlying price does go above the strike price, in theory, the investor can exercise the warrant to buy the underlying at the strike price.
Then he can sell it in the market to earn the difference.
In practice, warrants are traded on a cash settlement basis, and investors will be paid the difference directly.
Put Warrant
In the case of a put warrant, an investor can go for it when he is pessimistic about the market outlook.
If the underlying price is lower than the strike price, in theory, the invstor can exercise the warrant and buy the underlying from the market for delivery to the issuer at the strike price to earn the difference.
In reality, investors will be paid the difference directly.
If it turns out that the underlying price is higher than the strike price, the investor will lose the cost of the warrant.
(The above assumes that the investor will hold the warrant until maturity. Indeed, investors can also "buy low, sell high", and trade warrants just like stocks.)
A call warrant is OTM when its strike price is higher than its underlying price.
It is ITM, when its strike price is lower than its underlying price.
The situation is just the opposite for put warrants.
When its strike price is higher than its underlying price, a put warrant is ITM; and when its strike price is lower than its underlying price, it is OTM.
No matter it is a call or put, if the strike price is equal to the underlying price, the warrant is said to be ATM.
Summary
Call Warrant
ITM Strike Price < Underlying Price
ATM Strike Price = Underlying Price
OTM Strike Price > Underlying Price
Put Warrant
ITM Strike Price > Underlying Price
ATM Strike Price = Underlying Price
OTM Strike Price < Underlying Price
Additional Notes
Call Warrant
An investor can buy a call warrant if he is optimistic about the outlook for its underlying.
When the underlying price does go above the strike price, in theory, the investor can exercise the warrant to buy the underlying at the strike price.
Then he can sell it in the market to earn the difference.
In practice, warrants are traded on a cash settlement basis, and investors will be paid the difference directly.
Put Warrant
In the case of a put warrant, an investor can go for it when he is pessimistic about the market outlook.
If the underlying price is lower than the strike price, in theory, the invstor can exercise the warrant and buy the underlying from the market for delivery to the issuer at the strike price to earn the difference.
In reality, investors will be paid the difference directly.
If it turns out that the underlying price is higher than the strike price, the investor will lose the cost of the warrant.
(The above assumes that the investor will hold the warrant until maturity. Indeed, investors can also "buy low, sell high", and trade warrants just like stocks.)
Covered Warrants
Covered Warrants are mainly issued by investment banks.
They are issued to offer a leveraged investment tool for investors.
Cash settlement is the norm for Covered Warrants; thus companies will not face any changes in their shareholding structures as a result.
In other words, Covered Warrants will not dilute a company shareholding.
Unlike Company Warrants, Covered Warrants have good liquidity due to the market making system.
Their pricing mechanism is more transparent (statistics such as effective gearing is readily available).
It is possible to track changes in the theoretical prices of Covered Warrants.
Investors should study the relevant information carefully and bear in mind their own risk tolearance in making the decision whether to invest in Covered Warrants.
They are issued to offer a leveraged investment tool for investors.
Cash settlement is the norm for Covered Warrants; thus companies will not face any changes in their shareholding structures as a result.
In other words, Covered Warrants will not dilute a company shareholding.
Unlike Company Warrants, Covered Warrants have good liquidity due to the market making system.
Their pricing mechanism is more transparent (statistics such as effective gearing is readily available).
It is possible to track changes in the theoretical prices of Covered Warrants.
Investors should study the relevant information carefully and bear in mind their own risk tolearance in making the decision whether to invest in Covered Warrants.
Penny Warrants are very risky.
Warrants with only 1 - 2 weeks left to maturity and over 10% out-of-the-money (OTM) are called penny warrants.
They are very risky and their odds are low. The reasons are as follows:
1. The bid/ask spreads of penny warrants are rather wide.
2. Penny warrants have a very high rate of time decay.
3. It is easy to lose money with penny warrants.
4. Penny warrants may be not that price sensitive.
5. Penny warrants can hardly edge up but easily plummet.
They are very risky and their odds are low. The reasons are as follows:
1. The bid/ask spreads of penny warrants are rather wide.
2. Penny warrants have a very high rate of time decay.
3. It is easy to lose money with penny warrants.
4. Penny warrants may be not that price sensitive.
5. Penny warrants can hardly edge up but easily plummet.
Company Warrants
The basic concept of warrants is to give investors the right to buy or sell the underlying at the pre-determined strike price on the pre-determined date.
Company Warrants are issued by companies to raise funds or to reward employees or shareholders.
Upon maturity of a Company Warrant, provided that the stock price is higher than the strike price at the time, the holder is entitled to buy a certain number of shares of the company at the strike price.
When the holder does exercise the warrant, the company must issue new shares to meet the promise.
So, when Company Warrants are exercised, the shareholding of the company will be diluted.
Company Warrants normally have lower liquidity, and there is no way to compare their prices.
This is because the price of a Company Warrant is mainly determined by the board of directors.
Therefore, the warrant price is very likely to deviate from the underlying price.
Put another way, Company Warrants are less transparent and, sometimes, more speculative.
Investors should study the relveant information carefully and bear in mind their own risk tolerance in making the decision whether to invest in Company Warrants.
Company Warrants are issued by companies to raise funds or to reward employees or shareholders.
Upon maturity of a Company Warrant, provided that the stock price is higher than the strike price at the time, the holder is entitled to buy a certain number of shares of the company at the strike price.
When the holder does exercise the warrant, the company must issue new shares to meet the promise.
So, when Company Warrants are exercised, the shareholding of the company will be diluted.
Company Warrants normally have lower liquidity, and there is no way to compare their prices.
This is because the price of a Company Warrant is mainly determined by the board of directors.
Therefore, the warrant price is very likely to deviate from the underlying price.
Put another way, Company Warrants are less transparent and, sometimes, more speculative.
Investors should study the relveant information carefully and bear in mind their own risk tolerance in making the decision whether to invest in Company Warrants.
Warrants versus Stocks
If you are optimistic about a stock, the most direct investment strategy is to buy the stock.
However, some investors may choose to buy a related warrant instead.
Pros: Limited investment amount.
The biggest advantage of warrants is the leverage effect, which allows you to invest with less capital for the same return, as compared with stock trading.
The lower capital required for warrants means that, in case there is a market downturn, the loss will be limited as compared with investing directly in the stock.
In fact, in a number of major setbacks in the past, even giant blue chips fell sharply. Buying warrants instead of stocks can help minimize one's exposure to such market risks.
Cons: Time constraint
Of course, warrants are not without their shortcomings.
It takes a lot of time to understand the factors that may affect warrant prices before one can master the leverage effect to one's advantage.
Investors must get to know that warrants are subject to the time constraint.
The price of a warrant may change along with the implied volatility and dividend payout of its underlying and interest rates.
Even if you get the underlying direction right, you may still fail to reap the expected return.
In case you get it wrong, you should stop the loss.
Never sit on your holdings like a stock investor does to wait for a rebound. The price of a warrant will be dragged down by not only a falling underlying price, but also a declining time value.
Additional notes:
Warrants are derivatives.
They are an alternative investment to their underlying, and vice versa.
Warrants can never be an absolute substitute for their underlying.
Do manage your portfolio flexibly by investing in warrants and/or their underlying in light of the market conditions and outlook, as well as your own risk tolerance.
If one gets the market wrong, one will lose more from warrants (actual loss over investment cost) than from stocks.
That means the leverage effect of warrants is a double-edged sword. (Investors must take caution.)
The investment cost for warrants is lower than that for stocks, but they are more volatile.
Hence, their rate of potential gain or loss is much higher than their underlying.
Summary:
Warrants are a leveraged investment tool.
Don't foreget that the leverage effect can mean more profit, but also more loss.
So do limit your investment amount in warrants.
However, some investors may choose to buy a related warrant instead.
Pros: Limited investment amount.
The biggest advantage of warrants is the leverage effect, which allows you to invest with less capital for the same return, as compared with stock trading.
The lower capital required for warrants means that, in case there is a market downturn, the loss will be limited as compared with investing directly in the stock.
In fact, in a number of major setbacks in the past, even giant blue chips fell sharply. Buying warrants instead of stocks can help minimize one's exposure to such market risks.
Cons: Time constraint
Of course, warrants are not without their shortcomings.
It takes a lot of time to understand the factors that may affect warrant prices before one can master the leverage effect to one's advantage.
Investors must get to know that warrants are subject to the time constraint.
The price of a warrant may change along with the implied volatility and dividend payout of its underlying and interest rates.
Even if you get the underlying direction right, you may still fail to reap the expected return.
In case you get it wrong, you should stop the loss.
Never sit on your holdings like a stock investor does to wait for a rebound. The price of a warrant will be dragged down by not only a falling underlying price, but also a declining time value.
Additional notes:
Warrants are derivatives.
They are an alternative investment to their underlying, and vice versa.
Warrants can never be an absolute substitute for their underlying.
Do manage your portfolio flexibly by investing in warrants and/or their underlying in light of the market conditions and outlook, as well as your own risk tolerance.
If one gets the market wrong, one will lose more from warrants (actual loss over investment cost) than from stocks.
That means the leverage effect of warrants is a double-edged sword. (Investors must take caution.)
The investment cost for warrants is lower than that for stocks, but they are more volatile.
Hence, their rate of potential gain or loss is much higher than their underlying.
Summary:
Warrants are a leveraged investment tool.
Don't foreget that the leverage effect can mean more profit, but also more loss.
So do limit your investment amount in warrants.
Index Futures
In terms of trading, index futures are more straightforward.
When the index rises by a certain percentage, an index future buyer will gain while an index future seller will lose, exactly the same amount.
Trading in index futures is a zero sum game, and buyers and sellers gamble against each other.
Regarding capital requirement, a margin is payable upfront for an index future contract.
The investor has to pay the shortfall (margin call) to maintain the account balance at not less than the maintenance margin level.
An example: The initial margin required for a particular Index futures contract is $688 and the maintenance margin required is $550. Each point of the index is priced at $16. The investor will face a margin call if the particular index drops by more than 13 points, as the investor has to pay the shortfall to maintain the account balance at not less than the maintenance margin level.
When the index rises by a certain percentage, an index future buyer will gain while an index future seller will lose, exactly the same amount.
Trading in index futures is a zero sum game, and buyers and sellers gamble against each other.
Regarding capital requirement, a margin is payable upfront for an index future contract.
The investor has to pay the shortfall (margin call) to maintain the account balance at not less than the maintenance margin level.
An example: The initial margin required for a particular Index futures contract is $688 and the maintenance margin required is $550. Each point of the index is priced at $16. The investor will face a margin call if the particular index drops by more than 13 points, as the investor has to pay the shortfall to maintain the account balance at not less than the maintenance margin level.
Wednesday, 9 September 2015
Currency plays - Foreign Currency Deposit, Foreign Exchange Futures and Currency Warrants.
Foreign Currency Deposit
The easiest way to invest in foreign exchange (FX) is to switch your Ringgit dollar deposit for a foreign currency deposit.
FX futures or leveraged FX
To capture short term movements, some investors may choose to invest in FX futures or leveraged FX products. (However, foreign exchange spreads charged by banks vary from one to another. Besides, for futures trading, investors are required to open a futures account. There is also the risk of margin calls. This is obviously not every investor's cup of tea.)
Currency Warrants
The trading mechanism of Currency Warrants is much the same as other warrants. Investors only have to pick a suitable warrant in terms of price and maturity, as well as implied volatility, which should be relatively low as compared with others with similar terms.
Foreign exchange is a relative game. For a Currency Warrant, investors must always make sure which one in the currency pair is the positive play and which on the negative play.
Additional notes:
Compared with other investment instruments, Currency Warrants are more flexible. They can give a higher potential return without the risk of margin calls in futures trading. So, they are suitable for investors who want to profit from foreign exchange, but have relatively low tolerance for high risks.
Currency Warrants have limited downside, but unlimited upside. So, if one gets the market wrong and is wise enough to stop loss, the loss will be just a portion of the capital Yet, no matter how small the investment amount is, one should always stop loss if one gets the market wrong.
The easiest way to invest in foreign exchange (FX) is to switch your Ringgit dollar deposit for a foreign currency deposit.
FX futures or leveraged FX
To capture short term movements, some investors may choose to invest in FX futures or leveraged FX products. (However, foreign exchange spreads charged by banks vary from one to another. Besides, for futures trading, investors are required to open a futures account. There is also the risk of margin calls. This is obviously not every investor's cup of tea.)
Currency Warrants
The trading mechanism of Currency Warrants is much the same as other warrants. Investors only have to pick a suitable warrant in terms of price and maturity, as well as implied volatility, which should be relatively low as compared with others with similar terms.
Foreign exchange is a relative game. For a Currency Warrant, investors must always make sure which one in the currency pair is the positive play and which on the negative play.
Additional notes:
Compared with other investment instruments, Currency Warrants are more flexible. They can give a higher potential return without the risk of margin calls in futures trading. So, they are suitable for investors who want to profit from foreign exchange, but have relatively low tolerance for high risks.
Currency Warrants have limited downside, but unlimited upside. So, if one gets the market wrong and is wise enough to stop loss, the loss will be just a portion of the capital Yet, no matter how small the investment amount is, one should always stop loss if one gets the market wrong.
Options - Trading mechanism
If you are optimistic about the underlying, you can buy a call option or write a put option.
If you are negative about the underlying, you can choose to buy a put option or write a call option.
If you are positive about the underlying
If an investor wants to buy a call option, he needs to pay a premium upfront. In case the underlying price does rise above the strike price, the investor can exercise the option to earn the difference.
If the investor chooses to write a put option, he will receive a premium. If the underlying price climbs above the strike price, the put option will become worthless (and not exercised), leaving the premium safe in the hands of the investor. In writing a put option, the investor is required to deposit a margin and face the risk of unlimited loss (in theory), the underlying price can drop to zero).
If you are negative about the underlying
If the investor chooses to buy a put option, he needs to pay a premium upfront. In case the underlying price does fall below the strike price, the investor can exercise the option to earn the difference.
If the investor chooses to write a call option, and if the underlying price falls below the strike price, he will pocket the full amount of the premium. On the other hand, if the underlying price is higher than the strike price, he will face the risk of unlimited loss (in theory, the underlying price can go up indefinitely).
Warrants versus Options
In the case of warrants, the investor can only be a buyer, and choose between call warrants or put warrants. The seller is always the issuer.
While options offer more possibilities, the risk is also much bigger. In contrast, warrants are only subject to limited risk exposure.
If you are negative about the underlying, you can choose to buy a put option or write a call option.
If you are positive about the underlying
If an investor wants to buy a call option, he needs to pay a premium upfront. In case the underlying price does rise above the strike price, the investor can exercise the option to earn the difference.
If the investor chooses to write a put option, he will receive a premium. If the underlying price climbs above the strike price, the put option will become worthless (and not exercised), leaving the premium safe in the hands of the investor. In writing a put option, the investor is required to deposit a margin and face the risk of unlimited loss (in theory), the underlying price can drop to zero).
If you are negative about the underlying
If the investor chooses to buy a put option, he needs to pay a premium upfront. In case the underlying price does fall below the strike price, the investor can exercise the option to earn the difference.
If the investor chooses to write a call option, and if the underlying price falls below the strike price, he will pocket the full amount of the premium. On the other hand, if the underlying price is higher than the strike price, he will face the risk of unlimited loss (in theory, the underlying price can go up indefinitely).
Warrants versus Options
In the case of warrants, the investor can only be a buyer, and choose between call warrants or put warrants. The seller is always the issuer.
While options offer more possibilities, the risk is also much bigger. In contrast, warrants are only subject to limited risk exposure.
Five Major Factors influencing Warrant Price
1. Underlying price
2. Days to Maturity.
3. Implied Volatility
4. Interest Rate
5. Dividend.
2. Days to Maturity.
3. Implied Volatility
4. Interest Rate
5. Dividend.
How to trade warrants?
1. Select a bank or broker.
2. Open a securities account.
3. Monitor warrant trading through a stock quote terminal.
4. Study carefully the underlying stock and the terms of the warrant.
5. Trade warrant.
2. Open a securities account.
3. Monitor warrant trading through a stock quote terminal.
4. Study carefully the underlying stock and the terms of the warrant.
5. Trade warrant.
Saturday, 22 August 2015
Saturday, 15 August 2015
"I'm in prison, but I'm on just the same playing field as Warren Buffett,"
Curtis Carroll discovered the stock market in prison. Through friends and family on the outside, he invests from San Quentin State Prison in Northern California, and he's also an informal financial adviser to fellow inmates and correctional officers. Everyone in prison calls him Wall Street.
Read more here.
"I couldn't believe that this kind of access to this type of money could be accessible to anybody. Everybody should do it. And it's legal!" he says.
He pores over financial news: the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Forbes. Business is like a soap opera, he says, and he's always trying to anticipate what will happen next. "I like to know what the CEO's doing," he says. "I like to know who's in trouble."
Read more here.
Wednesday, 12 August 2015
Chinese central bank under pressure to weaken yuan further
China's move to devalue its currency reflects a growing clamour within government circles for a weaker yuan to help struggling exporters, ensuring the central bank remains under pressure to drag it down further in the months ahead, sources said.
The yuan has fallen almost 4% in two days since the central bank announced the devaluation yesterday, but sources involved in the policy-making process said powerful voices inside the government were pushing for it to go still lower.
Their comments, which offer a rare insight into the argument going on behind the scenes in Beijing, suggest there is pressure for an overall devaluation of almost 10%.
"There have been internal calls for the exchange rate to be more flexible, or depreciated appropriately, to help stabilise external demand and growth," said a senior economist at a government think-tank that advises policy-makers in Beijing.
"I think yuan deprecation within 10% will be manageable. There should be enough depreciation, otherwise it won't be able to stimulate exports."
The Commerce Ministry, which today publicly welcomed the devaluation as an export stimulus, had led the push for Beijing to abandon its previous strong-yuan policy.
Reuters could not verify how much influence Commerce Ministry officials had wielded in the decision to drive the yuan lower, but the sources said its officials were claiming victory after a long lobbying campaign against what some of them regarded as over-zealous reform led by the central bank.
The People's bank of China (PBOC) had been keeping the yuan strong to support the ruling Communist Party's goal of shifting the economy's main engine from exports to domestic demand.
A stronger yuan boosts domestic buying power, helps Chinese firms to borrow and invest abroad, and encourages foreign firms and governments to increase their use of the currency.
Until the devaluation, the currency had appreciated overall by 14% over the past 12 months on a trade-weighted basis, according to data from the Bank for International Settlements.
Premier Li Keqiang had repeatedly ruled out devaluation, but increased risks to economic growth, exacerbated by recent stock market turmoil, increased pressure to reverse course, the sources said.
At the weekend, China posted a shock 8.3% slump in July exports.
"Exporters face very big pressure, and China's economy also faces very big downward pressure," said a researcher at the commerce ministry's own think-tank, which recommended earlier this year that the government should unshackle the yuan.
"The yuan depreciated only slightly versus the dollar, but it has gained sharply against other currencies. China's economy and trade are no longer strong; why should the yuan be strong?"
He said he believed the yuan could fall to 6.7 by year-end, which would represent a near 9% decline since the eve of the devaluation. It traded around 6.43 against the dollar today, its lowest since August 2011.
The PBOC described its devaluation as a one-off move designed to make the currency more responsive to market forces.
The central bank guides the market daily by setting a reference rate for the yuan, from which trade may vary only 2%. Yesterday, it said it was setting the midpoint based on market forces, which have been willing the yuan lower.
Beijing is determined to achieve its economic growth target of 7% for this year. Top leaders will chart the course for the next five years at a meeting in October, and they are likely to continue targeting annual growth of around 7%.
"They (top leaders) are determined to hit 7% target. The downward pressure is big (but) so is the determination," said an economist inside the cabinet's think-tank.
Beijing prefers a gradual devaluation because a single, big move could spark capital flight and undermine its goal of fostering global use of the yuan in trade and finance, sources said.
China has been lobbying the IMF to include the yuan in its basket of reserve currencies, known as Special Drawing Rights, which it uses to lend to sovereign borrowers. This would mark a major step in terms of international use of the yuan.
The IMF said today that the central bank's new way of managing the exchange rate appeared to be a welcome step.
"There is definitely downward pressure on the economy, but we cannot rely (alone) on currency depreciation," said Zhu Baoliang, chief economist at the State Information Centre, a top government think-tank. – Reuters, August 12, 2015.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/business/article/chinese-central-bank-under-pressure-to-weaken-yuan-further#sthash.dx7bFam1.dpuf
Monday, 10 August 2015
My Check Lists
Here is a Ben Graham Checklist for Finding Undervalued Stocks
Criterias
Valuation
Risk
1. Earnings to price (the inverse of P/E) is double the high-grade corporate bond yield. If the high-grade bond yields 7%, then earnings to price should be 14%.
2. P/E ratio that is 0.4 times the highest average P/E achieved in the last 5 years.
3. Dividend yield is 2/3 the high-grade bond yield.
4. Stock price of 2/3 the tangible book value per share.
5. Stock price of 2/3 the net current asset value.
Quality of Balance Sheet and Management
Financial strength
6. Total debt is lower than tangible book value.
7. Current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is greater than 2.
8. Total debt is no more than liquidation value.
Quality of Growth
Earnings stability
9. Earnings have doubled in most recent 10 years.
10. Earnings have declined no more than 5% in 2 of the past 10 years.
If a stock meets 7 of the 10 criteria, it is probably a good value, according to Graham
Criterias
Valuation
Risk
1. Earnings to price (the inverse of P/E) is double the high-grade corporate bond yield. If the high-grade bond yields 7%, then earnings to price should be 14%.
2. P/E ratio that is 0.4 times the highest average P/E achieved in the last 5 years.
3. Dividend yield is 2/3 the high-grade bond yield.
4. Stock price of 2/3 the tangible book value per share.
5. Stock price of 2/3 the net current asset value.
Quality of Balance Sheet and Management
Financial strength
6. Total debt is lower than tangible book value.
7. Current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is greater than 2.
8. Total debt is no more than liquidation value.
Quality of Growth
Earnings stability
9. Earnings have doubled in most recent 10 years.
10. Earnings have declined no more than 5% in 2 of the past 10 years.
If a stock meets 7 of the 10 criteria, it is probably a good value, according to Graham
If you're income oriented, Graham recommended paying special attention to items 1 through 7.
If you're concerned about growth and safety, items 1 through 5 and 9 and 10 are important.
If you're concerned with aggressive growth, ignore item 3, reduce the emphasis on 4 through 6, and weigh 9 and 10 heavily.
Again, these checklists are a guideline and example, not a cookbook recipe you should follow precisely. They are a way of thinking and an example of how you may construct your own value investing system.
The criteria mentioned above are probably more focussed on dividends and safety than even today's value investors choose to be. But today's value investing practice owes an immense debt to this type of financial and investment analysis.
Spreadsheet for finding Undervalue Stocks
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tZGNWHLD2d2nTgCcxSKyoCA&output=html
If you're concerned about growth and safety, items 1 through 5 and 9 and 10 are important.
If you're concerned with aggressive growth, ignore item 3, reduce the emphasis on 4 through 6, and weigh 9 and 10 heavily.
Again, these checklists are a guideline and example, not a cookbook recipe you should follow precisely. They are a way of thinking and an example of how you may construct your own value investing system.
The criteria mentioned above are probably more focussed on dividends and safety than even today's value investors choose to be. But today's value investing practice owes an immense debt to this type of financial and investment analysis.
Spreadsheet for finding Undervalue Stocks
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tZGNWHLD2d2nTgCcxSKyoCA&output=html
If you're income oriented, Graham recommended paying special attention to items 1 through 7.
--------------------------
If you're concerned about growth and safety, items 1 through 5 and 9 and 10 are important.
---------------------------
If you're concerned with aggressive growth, ignore item 3, reduce the emphasis on 4 through 6, and weigh 9 and 10 heavily.
Quote
Criterias
Valuation
Risk
1. Earnings to price (the inverse of P/E) is double the high-grade corporate bond yield. If the high-grade bond yields 7%, then earnings to price should be 14%.
2. P/E ratio that is 0.4 times the highest average P/E achieved in the last 5 years.
3. Dividend yield is 2/3 the high-grade bond yield.
4. Stock price of 2/3 the tangible book value per share.
5. Stock price of 2/3 the net current asset value.
Quality of Balance Sheet and Management
Financial strength
6. Total debt is lower than tangible book value.
7. Current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is greater than 2.
8. Total debt is no more than liquidation value.
Quality of Growth
Earnings stability
9. Earnings have doubled in most recent 10 years.
10. Earnings have declined no more than 5% in 2 of the past 10 years.
--------------------------
If you're concerned about growth and safety, items 1 through 5 and 9 and 10 are important.
Quote
Criterias
Valuation
Risk
1. Earnings to price (the inverse of P/E) is double the high-grade corporate bond yield. If the high-grade bond yields 7%, then earnings to price should be 14%.
2. P/E ratio that is 0.4 times the highest average P/E achieved in the last 5 years.
3. Dividend yield is 2/3 the high-grade bond yield.
4. Stock price of 2/3 the tangible book value per share.
5. Stock price of 2/3 the net current asset value.
Quality of Balance Sheet and Management
Financial strength
6. Total debt is lower than tangible book value.
7. Current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is greater than 2.
8. Total debt is no more than liquidation value.
Quality of Growth
Earnings stability
9. Earnings have doubled in most recent 10 years.
10. Earnings have declined no more than 5% in 2 of the past 10 years.
---------------------------
If you're concerned with aggressive growth, ignore item 3, reduce the emphasis on 4 through 6, and weigh 9 and 10 heavily.
Quote
Criterias
Valuation
Risk
1. Earnings to price (the inverse of P/E) is double the high-grade corporate bond yield. If the high-grade bond yields 7%, then earnings to price should be 14%.
2. P/E ratio that is 0.4 times the highest average P/E achieved in the last 5 years.
3. Dividend yield is 2/3 the high-grade bond yield.
4. Stock price of 2/3 the tangible book value per share.
5. Stock price of 2/3 the net current asset value.
Quality of Balance Sheet and Management
Financial strength
6. Total debt is lower than tangible book value.
7. Current ratio (current assets/current liabilities) is greater than 2.
8. Total debt is no more than liquidation value.
Quality of Growth
Earnings stability
9. Earnings have doubled in most recent 10 years.
10. Earnings have declined no more than 5% in 2 of the past 10 years.
Risk-reward Does Not Make Sense At The Moment
Stan Druckenmiller: Bloomberg Encore (04/24)
8:01 AM MYT
April 25, 2015
April 24 -- Legendary money manager Stan Druckenmiller speaks to Bloomberg's Stephanie Ruhle. The exclusive interview covers topics including Federal Reserve policy, oil prices, the Greek debt crisis and much more. The founder of Duquesne Capital Management shares insights, predictions and in-depth analysis of global markets and the U.S. economy in 2015.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-04-25/stan-druckenmiller-bloomberg-encore-04-24-
8:01 AM MYT
April 25, 2015
April 24 -- Legendary money manager Stan Druckenmiller speaks to Bloomberg's Stephanie Ruhle. The exclusive interview covers topics including Federal Reserve policy, oil prices, the Greek debt crisis and much more. The founder of Duquesne Capital Management shares insights, predictions and in-depth analysis of global markets and the U.S. economy in 2015.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-04-25/stan-druckenmiller-bloomberg-encore-04-24-
Friday, 31 July 2015
The Oil and Gas sector is prone to intense cyclicality.
Oil and Gas sector
Commodity prices (oil) are cyclical, as are the sector's profits.
The energy sector is prone to intense cyclicality.
Small changes in available supply and market demand tend to have an oversized effect on commodity prices and profits.
However, neither cyclical peaks nor valleys tend to last very long. It is important to realize this before investing in the sector. Otherwise, you might be tempted to sell when the sector is doing relatively poorly (when things are about to begin looking up again) or buy at the peak when the companies are reaping a windfall (when growth is about to go into reverse).
It is better to buy when prices are at a cyclical low than when they are high and hitting the headlines.
From the ground. Upstream - Exploration and production (finding and mining the oil and gas.)
To the Pipelines. Ships and pipelines (transporting the oil and gas to refineries and then again to the end users.)
To the Refineries. Downstream - refining (breaking apart crude oil into its component parts and refine it into end products, such as gasoline, jet fuel, and heavy lubricants.)
To the Consumers. Downstream - marketing (operating petrol and convenience stations, as well as marketing fuels for industrial uses and electricity production).
-----
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/PublicInvest/80441.jsp
The domestic O&G market is treading along in a more positive light, largely supported by PETRONAS' initiatives. The domestic market is more protected as its “contractor” is largely the country's national oil company (NOC) which continues to sustain and enhance oil production. PETRONAS will continue to spend, but to revert to the previous capex levels of c.RM40bn/year which we believe would still continue to stimulate the domestic O&G industry nevertheless. The cost of oil production for this region also averages between USD30 to USD40/bbl hence still below current oil price levels deeming operations to still be viable.
Overweight. We had recently upgraded our recommendation to Overweight, in anticipation of upcoming contracts that was expected since 2H14 but was halted due to the oil price uncertainties. Malaysia O&G counters are trading on average at c.13x PE, vs. high double-digit PEs in the past and thus we see potential upside. Our top picks are Uzma (Outperform, TP:RM2.98), Bumi Armada (Outperform, TP: RM1.48 and Petra Energy (Outperform, TP: RM1.88).
Commodity prices (oil) are cyclical, as are the sector's profits.
The energy sector is prone to intense cyclicality.
Small changes in available supply and market demand tend to have an oversized effect on commodity prices and profits.
However, neither cyclical peaks nor valleys tend to last very long. It is important to realize this before investing in the sector. Otherwise, you might be tempted to sell when the sector is doing relatively poorly (when things are about to begin looking up again) or buy at the peak when the companies are reaping a windfall (when growth is about to go into reverse).
It is better to buy when prices are at a cyclical low than when they are high and hitting the headlines.
From the ground. Upstream - Exploration and production (finding and mining the oil and gas.)
To the Pipelines. Ships and pipelines (transporting the oil and gas to refineries and then again to the end users.)
To the Refineries. Downstream - refining (breaking apart crude oil into its component parts and refine it into end products, such as gasoline, jet fuel, and heavy lubricants.)
To the Consumers. Downstream - marketing (operating petrol and convenience stations, as well as marketing fuels for industrial uses and electricity production).
-----
http://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/PublicInvest/80441.jsp
Oil & Gas - Pause and Replay…
Author: PublicInvest | Publish date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015, 09:59 AM
…from 2HFY15 onwards as the market seems to have digested the shock of the oil price collapse and subsequent fluctuations, companies have continued business as usual. PETRONAS too has taken the opportunity to restructure their contract terms and award structure. They have launched a Cost Reduction Alliance, Coral 2.0, an industry-wide effort to expedite cost discipline, but are not cutting investments in innovation and research-related projects of which its CEO Datuk Wan Zulkiflee commented “stands to win in an increasingly difficult playing field”. In view of the lower oil price to be the new „normal' level, we believe the sector would be re-rated and thus retain our Overweight call. We anticipate contract types in the pipeline to include engineering, procurement, construction, installation and commissioning (EPCIC), fabrication, maintenance services and various jobs for the Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Development (RAPID) project. Meanwhile, Iran has been keeping everyone on their toes as United Nations Security Council endorsed a deal to lift the nation's economic sanctions, but place strict limits on its nuclear programme. The agreement is still pending approval from US Congress and nuclear inspectors' confirmation that Iran is complying with the terms however, thus would unlikely be removed until next year. Assuming the successful end to the sanctions, the oil output post sanctions, is estimated to be an additional 1m bbl/day.
Global O&G market. Sentiment in global markets is currently weak, spurred by crude oil futures hitting 4-month lows after a steep fall in China's stock markets. China currently the world's largest energy consumer could be signaling concern on its economic health, while evidence of a growing crude glut is building up. Oil price has also been pressured with rise US drilling activity with data showing 21 rigs added last week, the most in over a year. The financial pressure faced by oil majors with severe earnings dips in the latest quarter has fueled concerns further. Much of this is resulting from the lower prices that oil field service companies are charging their customers to continue its works. The situation is further heightened by capex cuts in upstream spending, which have filtered through to the oil service providers, first-hand. Our concern remains on how long oil prices would remain low (or fall lower). Further weaknesses could be seen if the rebound continues to be delayed, as smaller drillers may lose their financial support and encounter debt or liquidity crises. We urge investors to focus on companies with reliable cash flow at present and to be cautious about rapid growth at this juncture.The domestic O&G market is treading along in a more positive light, largely supported by PETRONAS' initiatives. The domestic market is more protected as its “contractor” is largely the country's national oil company (NOC) which continues to sustain and enhance oil production. PETRONAS will continue to spend, but to revert to the previous capex levels of c.RM40bn/year which we believe would still continue to stimulate the domestic O&G industry nevertheless. The cost of oil production for this region also averages between USD30 to USD40/bbl hence still below current oil price levels deeming operations to still be viable.
Overweight. We had recently upgraded our recommendation to Overweight, in anticipation of upcoming contracts that was expected since 2H14 but was halted due to the oil price uncertainties. Malaysia O&G counters are trading on average at c.13x PE, vs. high double-digit PEs in the past and thus we see potential upside. Our top picks are Uzma (Outperform, TP:RM2.98), Bumi Armada (Outperform, TP: RM1.48 and Petra Energy (Outperform, TP: RM1.88).
Coral 2.0. Under Coral 2.0, 11 key initiatives have been introduced to better implement plans and review the potential estimated savings target of between RM4.0bn and RM7.5bn, to be achieved before the end of the next 5 years in response to the decline in global oil prices. 25 petroleum arrangement contractors (PAC) in Malaysia including Royal Dutch Shell plc, Repsol S.A.'s subsidiary Talisman Energy Inc., Total S.A., Exxon Mobil Corp. and ConocoPhillips Co. have signed on to share best practices under CORAL 2.0 and are on the look-out for innovative platform designs that can be standardized across field developments to reduce capex and project delivery cycles. Key milestones include i) Proactive Demand Management, ii) Spend Consolidation, and iii) Driving Innovation. The initiative aims at instilling a cost effective approach across the industry, while uplifting the benchmark of the industry to a world-class level. This involves collaboration and operation with global best practices in Malaysian E&P.
Outcomes of Coral 2.0 workshop. Agreed since end-March, 8 initiatives to be implemented include; i) Joint Sourcing (Material Category), ii) Joint Sourcing (Services Category), iii) Technical Standard, iv) Logistic Control Tower, v) Warehousing Centralization & Common Stocking, vi) Cost Driver Benchmarking for OPEX, vii) Cost Driver Benchmarking for CAPEX, and viii) Late Life Field Optimization. The targeted potential annual cost saving to be achieved before the end of the next 5 years is RM4.0 to RM7.5bn. Factors Affecting Oil Price
Still-possible Greek default shadowing global equity markets, has pushed on the strength of the US dollar. The US dollar is often a form of safe haven during economic turmoil, however does not bode well for oil prices since oil is traded in dollars and thus would be more expensive. Greece's debt crisis moreover could dampen European energy demand.
Federal Reserve interest rate “gradual” hike - a short-term variable that could send oil prices up or down. Where a quicker decision is expected to increase interest rates which could press down oil prices, a looser policy may push prices up.
OPEC may see a change in leadership, as 79-year-old Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister is anticipated to retire and has a successor being groomed. Mr. Naimi's legacy strategy to keep output steady amidst a growing oil supply glut that caused prices to plummet, would indeed make him memorable. With Iran and Mr. Naimi's potential retirement on the table, the next OPEC meeting in November could be far more exciting. Indonesia was also seen to push to rejoin the cartel since its membership suspension in 2008 when it became a net oil importer. Indonesia wants to secure supply contracts with OPEC members, following its plans to ramp up its refinining capacity and thus would need crude supplies to fuel the production. They are seen to be aggressive in lobbying for this and could be reinstated by as early as the November meeting.
Geopolitical escalations, in particular in the Middle East and between Russia and the US.
IEA landmark report on recommendations to achieve “peak emissions” by the end of this decade.
Iran’s “appealing” oil contract terms include a collection of attractive contract terms to international oil companies which would pay more for higher production. It is also rumoured that Iran may even be prepared to offer production sharing contract (PSC) terms. It is also believed that Iran needs to JV with international oil majors to share its technology. With the world powers reaching a historic agreement to lift the sanctions on Iran but place strict limits on its nuclear programme.
Top Picks
Uzma will be buoyed by i) full year contribution from MMSVS (Hydraulic Workover Units), ii) full year contribution from Premier Enterprise Corporation (PEC) for trading of chemical and other commodities in oil refinery, iii) increase in strategic stake in Setegap Ventures from 30% to 49%, and iv) remuneration fee when RSC production begins 2HFY15.
Bumi Armada (BAB) will be supported by its long-term contracts coupled with its reputable execution abilities that would allow it to be enhanced by new contracts. We remain positive on BAB, considering its initiatives to stay focused and to dissolve potentially non-viable divisions such as the Oilfield Services division amidst the oil price uncertainties landscape. Earnings growth will be sustained by its RM25.6bn orderbook, comprising of long-term FPSO projects such as Kraken, 15-06, Madura and the latest Malta floating storage unit (FSU), BAB's foray into the liquefied natural gas (LNG) business.
Petra Energy will see the i) early activation of the Topside Major Maintenance Services (TMM) contract by PETRONAS Carigali Sdn. Bhd. (PCSB) for SBO effective since 4 July 2014, and will last until 20 May 2018. ii) Higher work orders for the PANM contract. iii) The KBM cluster RSC whereby Kapal and Banang Fields have produced c.4.0mbbl of oil to-date, with an average of c.700,000bbl/quarter. The Group has taken key measures to manage costs and operation expenditures while exploring new opportunities to attain new revenue streams.
Source: PublicInvest Research - 28 Jul 2015
Thursday, 30 July 2015
Overvalued global markets
Tan warns of overvalued global markets
FORMIDABLE Malaysian fund managers who speak their mind are hard to come by.
But you would not think of that when you meet the unassuming Capital Dynamics founder and managing director Tan Teng Boo – also the founder of Malaysia’s only closed-end listed fund, iCapital.biz.
For the record, iCapital.biz recorded a compounded return of 13.78% a year since its listing in 2005 versus 8.17% for the KLCI.
If the cash portion of RM240mil is removed, that return would be much higher. (Capital Dynamics is the fund manager of iCapital.biz).
Capital Dynamics now has three funds, with its biggest exposure in stocks listed on the London Stock Exchange. In Asia, its highest weightage are stocks listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
So this week, when we spoke with Tan, he was again armed with some interesting contrarian insights.
“To know whether a market is bullish or bearish, you see what kind of fools are around. In a bear market, the old fools are in the market. These are the seasoned people who have made mistakes. Today, there are a lot of new fools around,” he says.
On a more serious note, Tan expects global markets to fall drastically. All his funds presently have high cash levels. He bases this view purely on stretched valuations.
“Look at the last 12 months. The S&P 500 is now trading at a price earnings ratio of 20 times PE. What is more significant is that if you look at the Schiller cyclically-adjusted 10-year PE, it is now at 26 times.
“The last three times it was at this level was in 1929, 1999 and 2007 to 2008,” Tan says.
“When valuations are high, anything can be a trigger, and just like that, people will sell. And when markets are overvalued, you get bad returns.”
Are there anything in particular he is eyeing?
“For now, I cannot find specific stocks. I can’t buy crude palm oil (CPO) stocks.
“CPO prices are down 50%, but stocks are at an all-time high!” he says.
Secondly, Tan resolutely says that he is underweight on the Malaysian oil and gas sector, as well as some of the oil and gas service providers in Singapore.
“The oil and gas business is a commodity business where margins are not sustainable. Now, it appears that the barriers to entry are so low. When you have players like Eversendai Corp and Yinson Holdings Bhd, who have never seen a rig in their lives, now becoming global players, I would be very careful,” he says.
Tracking the economy
Tan says post World War 2, inflation has been on a steady uptrend.
Thus, although the Conference Board Leading Economic Index (LEI) has been rising, he feels that this cannot be used as the ultimate indicator to track the economy.
(According to Wikipedia, LEI is an American economic leading indicator intended to forecast future economic activity.
It is calculated by The Conference Board, a non-governmental organisation, which determines the value of the index from the values of 10 key variables.
These variables have historically turned downward before a recession and upward before an expansion).
“In the second half of the 19th Century, recessions took place even when there was inflation. The lack of or presence of inflation was not a consideration of recession.
“I think we are now entering that phase. In the United States, real wages have been horrible and have not improved.
“Savings rates are at historic lows.
“And right now, the US economy is deleveraging. Thus, not increasing interest rates will not stop the recession from taking place,” he says.
He notes that there are some clues from Japan.
“Post 1990, there has been no inflation. While unemployment is low, there is, however, no aggregate demand. Consumers are simply not spending, and this is causing the recession”.
Meanwhile, when meeting the management of a company, Tan still prefers to look at the numbers.
He says the best measure is still the return on capital employed.
“You will notice that most analysts or people who invest in stocks put more attention on the investment decision.
“For us, we put the bulk of our attention on the research.
“And when we do research, we talk to the regulators, the vendors, the competitors, then finally only do we talk to the targeted company,” he says.
Tan says it is because of this sort of analysis that iCapital sold all of its Tesco shares in 2011.
“We felt the management was not getting their strategy right,” says Tan.
Tesco has recently been hit by allegations of an accounting scandal and Warren Buffett is losing more than 40% of his US$1.7bil (RM5.44bil) investment.
China
Tan has been a strong advocator of China, and this view is still just as entrenched.
“The re-emergence of Asia is taking place, and it will be led by China, and it’s going to be earth-shattering. This re-emergence, however, will not be welcomed by developed countries and Japan,” says Tan.
“China has all the capabilities.
“People think China just copies intellectual properties, but that is not the case. If you go back to history, you will see that the Chinese have a tremendously rich past.
“There is immense potential, and over the next 30 to 50 years, many things are going to change.
“Values for one, will change. The corporate governance of the West will change. For example, maybe they will realise that democracy doesn’t seem to work,” he says.
“The new synthesis could be something like socialism but with Chinese characteristics. Or capitalism with Chinese characteristics,” he adds.
Tan likes what Chinese president Xi Jinping is doing to clamp down on corruption. He sees this as real courage.
“He is now trying to bring back self-respect , where people must respect their culture. He is trying to revive Confucianism. He is aiming for a cleaner government, different values. It will not just be a case of being glorious to be rich,” says Tan.
Tan claims that for all of Japan’s technological advancement, the Japanese haven’t invented a single thing.
“Research shows that half the modern technologies of the world all originate from China. Football and golf, for instance, come from China.”
There are only two countries in this world which are able to launch missiles at hypersonic speed - China and the United States.
“The world hasn’t really seen the transformation of China,” says Tan.
He says that if China could become something like Singapore in terms of per capita income, then the world is only just witnessing the beginning of it.
“Every dynasty in China has spanned a few hundred years. So we are just seeing the beginning of the era of the Communist Party,” said Tan.
Hong Kong
On the issue of Hong Kong pro-democracy demonstrators demanding the right to elect the city’s chief executive via democratic elections, Tan describes their move as silly against a benevolent China.
“The people of Hong Kong should remember that Hong Kong has always been part of China until the First Opium War. The British victories over China resulted in the cessation of Hong Kong to the UK (United Kingdom) via the enactment of new treaties in 1842.”
He says that in July 1992, Chris Patten, who was the last British Governor of Hong Kong, quickly introduced reforms that increased the number of elected members in the legislative council.
“Why did Patten do this so close to the 1997 handover when all the time that Hong Kong was under British colonisation, the long-held British practice of no general elections was never questioned? Why do the people of Hong Kong behave so aggressively against China, but against the British, they did not dare make any noise?” he asks.
“Britain ruled Hong Kong to selfishly benefit Britain. China did the opposite when she took back Hong Kong,” he claims.
The next big thing
Tan thinks that whatever it is, it will be coming from China.
“If you’re talking of an Internet-related technology, it could be Alibaba (China’s biggest online commerce company) or something similar to it. The number of Internet users are three to four times larger than that of the United States and it is still growing. In fact it can still double up,” he says.
Tan says that Asia, with its three billion people, is also re-emerging, particularly India and Indonesia.
“The people of Indonesia are hardworking and creative. Now, if their new president can really enact change and lead them in the right way, I see tremendous potential for them. If India and Indonesia can start from where China started 20 years ago, the potential will be tremendous,” he said.
On oil, Tan says predicting its movement has become a lot more complex today.
This is because when crude oil moves to a certain level, renewable energies become a lot more attractive. He sees shale as just one of many factors contributing to the drop in oil prices.
“What’s clear is that the reliance on OPEC (Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) has dropped, and moving forward it will become less important,” he said.
Tan’s immediate ambition is to get iCapital.biz a dual listed global fund listed.
“As an Asian gentleman, this is a promise I have made to the share owners and I want to deliver,” says Tan., adding that what is important is how you do whatever you are doing.
“Do it the best that you can, then you become good at it. And once you become good at it, then you become interested in your career,” he says.
http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2014/10/04/The-cautious-contrarian-Capital-Dynamics-Tan-warns-of-overvalued-global-markets/?style=biz
Monday, 27 July 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)