Monday, 9 November 2009

Valuing a Business

Valuing a Business
Last updated: 7/11/2008 View printable version

Selling your business will probably be the largest financial transaction you will ever undertake. Getting the right price is crucial.


You will have worked hard over years, maybe even decades, to build a successful company, and will want to maximise the amount you receive; realising its full value will be the ultimate reward for all your hard work and dedication.


And going into a potential deal with an idea of the figure you expect to negotiate enable you to manage the process far more effectively.


Before thinking about approaches to the so-called ‘art’ of valuation, you should consider your reasons for selling. Most advisors recommend formulating an ‘exit strategy’ before you even start a business; selling it when you have achieved your objectives, financial or otherwise, is the most common route.


Selling for the right reasons


Although many business owners continue driving forward well beyond their planned exit point, it’s worth remembering the old maxim: “it’s better to sell out than burn out.” Why not cash in while you are still young and healthy and enjoy the proceeds from all your hard work?


But even in a successful business, a sale can be precipitated by other factors – personal problems, for example, or disagreements among partners or directors. You might receive an unsolicited approach from a company, offering unimaginable amounts of cash for your business. More commonly, you might realise that the current economic climate is ideal for a seller – and not necessarily because of any wider indicators (unheard of purchase prices for similar companies, for example).


Too many sellers choose to exit when their business enters a downturn, when the value of their business looks lower to vendors. In an ideal world, you should aim to sell when your business looks set for growth: when turnover and profit is up, and when buyers will be desperate to get a share of the action.


Of course, some businesses are sold because the owner feels they are unsuccessful or are likely to become so in the future – but this doesn’t mean they are worthless. The right vendor – one that knows the sector – could find a business like this more attractive than a thriving one, because he or she might have the capital or resources to provide the missing link that would trigger growth and quickly boost its value. Even if a company isn’t a ‘cash cow’, it will, in most cases, have some form of assets, real or otherwise, that will represent value to the right buyer.


Valuation is an art, not a science


Understanding the valuation process will allow you to understand the ‘mind’ of that buyer. It will also help you to maximise the value of the business – by realising what you need to do to prepare a business for sale.


Many commentators claim valuation is an art, not a science. Renowned financial journalist Michael Brett once quipped that, in that case, it is the only form of art that regularly appears on company balance sheets.


What is really meant by this phrase is that valuation involves a lot of guesswork and lateral thinking. There is no ‘right’ figure – it could be worth half as much to one buyer as another. If your main product is a widget and demand suddenly surges in Brazil, this ratio could be one to three, or one to 10 if investment bankers have suddenly decided to take an interest in your sector.


If you are selling a house, valuers can use the sale price of other houses in the same street that were sold recently to reach a figure. But this method does not work well in valuing a business: it is highly unlikely that one with the same number of employees in the same part of the country will have been sold within the past month or so.


Valuations, even when carried out by experienced corporate financiers, can go horribly wrong – for example, Ford bought Kwik-Fit for £1bn in 1999, only to sell it for less than half the price three years later. Conversely, there are a host of examples of stock market analysts criticising acquisitions that subsequently outperform all expectations.



Nevertheless, there are four ‘models’ you should consider using to estimate the right price for your business:
  • asset-based,
  • price/earnings ratio,
  • entry cost and
  • discounted cash flow.
Some are more appropriate to particular sectors or company types than others, but there is no absolutely correct approach for any business.



Throughout the process, you will need to bear in mind what ‘components’ your business has: the assets it owns, the goodwill it has with customers and suppliers, and the expertise of its employees.


The asset-based approach is the most conservative of all valuation models. It is appropriate for businesses such as property companies or manufacturers, where assets form a large percentage of the ‘worth’ of the business (in the former case, buildings or development sites; in the latter case, expensive tools or machines). This method gives you a rough idea of the minimum price you can expect to negotiate – a financial comfort blanket.


To use this method, you simply add up the value of your assets and subtract any liabilities. Using the figures in your accounts – the net book value – is a good starting point, but remember that accountants are obliged to be prudent; they must give the minimum the assets could be sold for.


You will need to adjust those figures to reflect changing circumstances and market value. For example, have assets gone up in value? Or would they be difficult to dispose of, whatever the original cost? Has your accountant exaggerated the possibility of bad debts? In your calculation of liabilities, remember to include the company’s obligations – for example, rent or redundancy payments.


Price/earnings ratio


The price/earnings ratio is usually the most familiar valuation method to people with a modicum of business knowledge. It’s the most common way that analysts compare the values of companies quoted on the stock exchange. It’s not always appropriate for smaller, unlisted businesses as it can only really represent the value of established companies with a history of steady profit.


A value is determined using this method by dividing the market value per share by the post-tax earnings per share. So if the value of a single share on the stock market is 100p and the post-tax earnings per share are 5p, then the price/earnings ratio is 20. This means then that the business will be valued at 20p for each 1p of current earnings. So the higher the ratio, the higher the value you place on the business.


According to the Institute of Directors (IoD), a small unquoted business is usually valued at between five and 10 times its annual profit, depending on its history, potential and other market factors; a large, growing quoted company with good prospects can have a P/E ratio of over 20.


The IoD recommends looking at newspapers such as the Financial Times to gauge historic price/earnings ratios for companies in your sector, and adjusting them accordingly – it says that the P/E ratio for a small private company is around half of that of a listed company in the same sector. However, it is very difficult to get figures for comparison for other privately owned enterprises, as the details of the actual deal will remain confidential, with speculation in the trade press or clauses tying in the vendor often inflating the real figure.


Nevertheless, it should be possible to get a rough range for the P/E ratio. And of course, as mentioned earlier, you will have begun preparing your business for sale well in advance of making any concrete plans, taking measures to increase the apparent profitability of the business.


Calculating entry cost gives you an idea of how much it would cost to build a start a business and build it to the same size and with the same profits as the one being sold. To do this, you have to work out how much it would cost to purchase your assets all over again, develop the products, recruit and train the workforce, and build up a customer base – all from scratch.


You must also be quite brutal with your business and put yourself in the buyer’s shoes: if the business was located elsewhere, or used different raw materials, would it have a lower entry cost?


Finally, there is the most technical of all methods: discounted cashflow. Like the price/earnings ratio, it is best used for businesses that are stable, mature and generate cash, i.e., enterprises in which you have confidence that the returns and profits will at least match the historic values for the next decade or so.


To calculate this, establish the estimated profits for a given time period in the future. You then adjust this figure to take account of the diminishing value of money over time. How much would you have to leave in an account, at current bank interest rates, to produce those profits over that period of time? This will give you a ‘base figure’ for how much a person might be prepared to pay – but any company will be riskier than investing in a savings account. So replace the bank interest rate with a higher figure reflecting that greater risk (which will produce a lower initial sum).


For example, a company makes a profit of £10k per annum, which is forecast to remain steady for the next 10 years. Let us assume our potential buyer wants to achieve a 10% rate of return. But £10k received in five years time is not worth the same as £10k received today – because if I received that £10k today I could put it in a bank (where let us assume there is a 5% interest rate) and in five years time it would be worth £12,763. Working backwards, then, £10k received in five years’ time is actually worth £7,835 today, whereas £10k in 10 years’ time is actually worth £6,139 today. Adding all these figures together will give the buyer an idea of how much he should pay now to receive the returns from the business in the future.


Although there is no right approach for any one business, certain industry sectors use industry-standard ‘rules of thumb’ as shortcuts to valuation. These quick rules are also commonly used in the trade press to discuss the dynamics of the industry. For example, investment management companies are rated on the percentage of fund under management; estate agents are valued on the number of branches they have; and suitable prices for nursing homes are worked out on the basis of the number of beds. Retail and leisure businesses – such as pubs – tend to use standard multiples of turnover or profit after tax.


The ‘multiplier’ used when calculating the value in this way will vary depending on the security of the income. Sectors in which personal relationships are of paramount importance tend to use lower multipliers than asset- or technology-reliant businesses, for obvious reasons.


If you or your colleagues are an obviously key ingredient of the company’s success, buyers may well offer a higher price if you are prepared to commit to staying on as an employee or consultant for a fixed period of time. This reduces disruption and smooths the transition to new owners. However, the buyers may offer to pay a second sum at the end of that period – a risky route if they already own companies that are not entirely solvent.


Whatever the sector, though, buyers tend to regard bigger businesses as more secure – they have greater resources with which to weather any unforeseen economic storms. Buyers will pay more for such reliability.


Businesses can have other advantages that will increase the security of their profits. For example, a business might have intellectual property rights over a particular manufacturing process, recipe or marketing logo; or it might have a contract with a major multinational or with the government.


The nature of the buyer


Finally, the value of the business will also depend on the nature of the buyer. Acquirers will generally fall into two categories:
  • financial and
  • strategic.


A financial buyer, such as a venture capitalist, will generally look at your business in isolation, analyse the viability of its profits, and examine whether it could increase them if it were to streamline the company.


A strategic buyer, on the other hand, will be in the same or a related sector. Combining your business with his might enable him to cut costs in a way not possible for the financial buyer. He could centralise the sales and marketing function, for example. This type of buyer is also likely to have a greater understanding of – and faith in – the sector, and, consequently, your business model.


But while strategic buyers tend to be able to offer higher sums, they are few and far between.


Approaches from competitors are also dangerous. Do you really want to give a potential buyer divulge the mechanics of your business, only for him or her to abort the sale and remain a competitor? Then, he or she would be equipped with knowledge of your weak points, which he or she could then exploit, and your strengths, which he or she could then replicate?


One of the great advantages of knowing about valuation techniques is that it allows you to see what steps you can take to increase the value of your business.




http://uk.businessesforsale.com/uk/valuing-a-business.aspx

Valuing a Business: The Buyer's Perspective

 
Valuing a Business: The Buyer's Perspective
Last updated: 10/25/2007 View printable version

 

 
Often times, public company data is used when attempting to value a privately-held firm. This comparison usually requires substantial adjustments to offset the risks inherent in the privately-held or closely-held company. These potential risk characteristics are usually elements that are overlooked by sellers, but not by potential buyers.

 
Sellers obviously look at their companies much differently than do prospective acquirers. Owners and company officers tend to place value on different factors than a buyer. However, when it comes time to sell, it's important that the seller consider those factors that are important to a buyer.

 
Interviews with buyer prospects reveal that they are concerned with, and influenced by, the factors outlined below. They are often the basic considerations that determine whether they actually purchase the business, as well as the price they are willing to pay. It is the buyer's evaluation of these factors that can make or break a possible sale.

 
Buyers tend to look at these elements as risk factors. They also look at the expectation of future earnings. The following characteristics affect, both positively and negatively, the future earnings potential of and the risks involved in a target business.

 
Historical Earnings

 
The history of a company's earnings is very important to a prospective buyer. A long history of stable, and hopefully increasing, earnings is a positive factor in whether the buyer will pursue the acquisition.

 
Conversely, a brief history or inconsistent earnings will certainly be a negative factor. A short time frame (for example, a company that has been in business for a year or less) and erratic earnings present obvious risk factors.

 
Entrepreneurs often underestimate the costs (and time) necessary to get the company to a profitable level.
  • Start-ups are difficult to sell under the best of circumstances.
  • The next time period in the life of a business is after three years, at which point there is some history, and a track record is beginning.
  • The third period is usually after the company has been in business for a minimum of five years. Now the company has a track record and a reasonable history of performance.

 
Growth Prospects for Both the Business and Industry

 
If the buyer is from the same industry, then he or she should already have the answers to these questions. If the buyer is from a different industry or business type, then these are very important issues.

 
Certainly, no one can predict the future, so these issues are subjective at best. Thanks to the Internet, however, information is much easier to obtain than ever before. If the buyer perceives the target business to be in a growth industry, then the valuation can be considerably higher than one that is not.

 
Depth of Management

 
Just as a skilled and well-trained workforce commands a higher value, so does strength and depth of management. Generally speaking the smaller the company, the less depth of management.

 
A business that is primarily dependent on the owner or a manager will bring substantially less in the marketplace than one that has key management in place. Many prospective purchasers also want more than one layer of experienced management in place.

 
Some buyer concerns about management:

 
Will top management stay beyond any contractual periods?
Is the current management motivated and what incentives do they need?
Are current management values, etc., consistent with the buyers?
Does current management have the leadership skills to move the company forward?
Is the depth of current management sufficient to fulfill projected growth plans?
Is current management able to handle change?
Employee Stability

 
Well-trained and skilled employees are a big asset. National studies indicate that over 50 percent of employees are unhappy with their jobs. Having a skilled and happy workforce in place is especially important for new owners without industry experience.

 
Prospective purchasers are equally concerned with the high-cost of finding, hiring and training new employees. For these reasons, companies with a well-trained, skilled and contented workforce will command a premium value. Companies that utilize low-skilled employees and have high employee turnover will bring a much lower price.

 
Terms of Sale

 
Is the company solid enough to support debt financing as opposed to equity capital? Are the company owners, if privately owned, willing to help finance the acquisition? The answers to these questions impact value. The availability of capital can be a significant factor in increasing the value to an acquirer.

 
Diversification

 
Diversification has two elements. The first is the diversification of products or services. Can they be readily expanded? Do the products or services just fill a niche and therefore limit expansion? What limitations does the company have, such as customer or supplier restrictions?

 
The second element is geographic. Providing the product or service on a national level certainly increases value and decreases the risk to the buyer. Conversely, only local or regional distribution reduces value and increases risk.

 
Industry characteristics that increase value

 
Industries with strong trade or professional associations
Industries with low failure rates
Industries with any type of regulation, licensing, patents - anything that might restrict the amount of competition
Industries with established products or services coupled with stable pricing

Competition

 
Companies in very competitive industries may have less value than ones with little or moderate competition. Heavy competition can lead to lower prices creating lower volume and profits. However, concentrated competition, for some businesses, such as auto dealers clustering in auto malls, can actually increase sales.

 
Business Type

 
This element is most likely to be in the "eyes of the beholder." The buyer's perception of risk may focus almost entirely on the type of business or industry. Businesses that are easily started obviously have less value than those that are equipment/capital intensive or require very skilled workers or specialized knowledge. Industry trends can play an important role in the value of a business.

 
Some industries seem to be simply more "popular" than others. Manufacturing represents less than 10 percent of all businesses, but the demand for this type is very high. The demand for retail businesses that must compete with the large "box" stores is very low.

 
Location and Facilities

 
A well-located office and/or facility will, at least psychologically, increase value. Well-maintained fixtures and equipment will definitely increase value. Everything else being equal, an attractive plant with well-maintained equipment located on the "right side of the tracks" will have a higher value than one without these advantages.

 
Summary

 
The business characteristics described above outline some of the pitfalls or risks in using public company data when looking at the privately-held or closely-held company. Buyers obviously - and sellers certainly - should be aware of the factors or characteristics described above as they heavily influence the ultimate value of a company, the time it takes to sell, and sometimes whether it will sell at all.

 
Note: Much of the above information is based on an article contained in the Mergers and Acquisitions Handbook of Small & Midsized Companies, published by John Wiley & Sons.

 
http://us.businessesforsale.com/us/valuing-a-business-the-buyers-perspective.aspx

Inventory Valuation: Tricks and Traps!

by Toby Tatum

Buying or selling a small business, if done in a way that minimizes the potential for purchase negotiations to fall apart or for post-transaction animosity—or possibly even litigation—between the buyer and the seller, can be a complicated process. As a business broker and as a former business owner who has bought and sold several restaurants, I have experienced first hand dozens of tricks, traps and unpleasant surprises that lie waiting to snare unsuspecting buyers and sellers. I addressed all of these things in my book, Anatomy of a Business Purchase Offer.

There is one incident that I'll tell you about here that I encountered as a business broker assisting a client with selling his discount liquor/convenience store. It had to do with the amount the buyer would pay for the seller’s inventory.

In this case, which is typical, the purchase offer indicated the amount the buyer would pay for the inventory on hand at close of escrow. The offer stated that the buyer would purchase the inventory at the seller’s cost and included the caveat that the price stated in the purchase offer was only an estimate; that the exact value of the inventory would be determined via a physical count to be taken immediately preceding close of escrow.

As agreed between the parties, in the early morning hours on the day escrow was to close, the seller had an inventory counting service come into his store, count every product on the shelves and note the retail price of each item. The seller therewith came to the closing meeting with an exact representation of the value of his inventory at retail. And here is where the transaction process fell apart.

During the course of purchase negotiations, the seller told the buyer that, on average, his merchandise’s retail price was 30% above his wholesale cost. So, with a letter from the inventory counting service stating that the value of the seller’s inventory at retail prices was determined to be $130,000, the buyer agreed to pay 70% of that amount, or $91,000. The seller said that was not enough, an argument ensued and the buyer, together with the business broker assisting him, walked out of the meeting. The deal had fallen apart at the very last stage in the process.

Fortunately for me at least, since I wasn’t going to get paid unless the deal closed, the buyer and seller got back together later that day and consummated the transaction. The buyer agreed to pay the seller $100,000 for his inventory instead of the $91,000 he previously insisted was the correct amount.

So, whose calculation of the seller’s cost for the inventory was right, the buyer’s or the seller’s? I’ll give you a hint: I was representing the seller. Since the seller’s merchandise was marked up 30% (on average) above its wholesale cost, then the cost of goods sold reflected on his Profit & Loss statement was 76.9%. For example, if an item cost $1.00 and is sold for $1.30, the cost of goods sold expressed as a percent of the selling price is $1.00 divided by $1.30 which equals 76.9%. Therefore, once the retail value of the inventory was determined to be $130,000, the correct way to calculate its wholesale cost was to multiply that amount by the seller’s cost of goods sold of .769 as reflected on his P&L. $130,000 times .76923 = $100,000.

In the example I just cited, determining the wholesale cost of a business owner’s inventory given its retail price is simple. However, not all value determinations are this simple. In some cases it may be best to separate merchandise by the categories appearing on the profit and loss statement and calculate the wholesale cost of each category using the method described above. In other cases, the best way is to match each item of inventory with the vendor’s invoice—it all depends on the unique circumstances of a particular business, what’s reasonable and practical and what the buyer and seller can agree upon. I recommend that the buyer state the valuation methodology for the inventory in the offer itself. Doing so should avoid the kind of unfortunate incident I have related here.

A few days later the buyer asked me to meet him at the store he had just purchased. He said he wanted to show me something. When I met him at his new business he showed me several items on the shelves. Although he had no proof, he said it appeared that the seller had gone through his entire stock of merchandise the night before the escrow closing day and placed new retail price stickers on everything—at higher prices than his standard 30% mark-up!

Be careful, it’s a jungle out there!


http://www.businessbookpress.com/articles/article103.htm

VALUING THE BUSINESS

Valuing the business is not as hard as you think, but you should never completely rely on a broker's or seller's estimate as to what a business is worth. Remember that buying a business is fundamentally an investment and consequently the business is worth only as much as its ability to generate profits for you based on how much money you must put into it. If you are going to work in the business as most people do, then the business should also pay you a fair wage in addition to the profits. The best way to determine a business's value is to work backwards from the available profits that a seller can prove.

 
For example, let's say that a business has a total of $100,000 pre-tax profits (proven by IRS tax returns for the latest full year of operation), before allowing for an owner/manager's wage. You plan to work full time in the business (and believe me, you probably will!), and a fair wage for the work if you were to hire someone to do it is $40,000. That leaves $60,000 of available profit to work with but don't forget to deduct the income taxes that you'll have to pay on this, probably about $18,000 depending on the state and city the business is in, plus other personal factors (figure at least 30%). That gets you down to about $42,000 of profits left to be able to either
  • pay off the debt you incur to buy the business or
  • to provide you with a reasonable return on your cash investment (if you're lucky enough to have this much cash).

 
There are many ways to work with this $42,000, but most lenders of money to buy a business, whether they are the sellers themselves or others, want to see a relatively short payoff term (let's say 5 years) and a fair interest rate on the money (let's say 10%). When you do the math to determine the values of $42,000 yearly payments for 5 years at 10% interest, the amount turns out to be about $165,000. This is the approximate total value of the business and a good starting point for negotiations.

 
When I say total, I mean total. The total value and therefore the business's selling price must include all closing costs, assets, transfer and franchise fees, etc. Remember; a business is worth only as much as its ability to produce profits for you. Of course, if you change the time period for payoff of the purchase price, the interest rate, the anticipated taxes, and other factors, the price you can afford to pay for the business can go up or down.

 

 
http://www.businessbookpress.com/articles/article109.htm

Common methods of valuing a business

There's a range of ways to value a business. Valuations based on multiples of future earnings and the capitalisation of future cashflows are the most common. There are a number of common valuation methods:

1.  Businesses with a record of sustainable profits are often valued at a multiple of earnings. Profits are adjusted for any unusual, one-off items to arrive at an estimate of 'normalised' earnings. Smaller businesses are usually valued at a lower multiple than similar, larger companies.

2.  Mature, cash-generating businesses can be valued in a similar way but based on cashflow. Future cashflows are estimated and discounted - this is known as discounted cashflow. Long-term cashflow is worth less than cashflow due shortly.

3.  An asset valuation might be appropriate for stable businesses with significant tangible assets - property or manufacturing businesses, for example. Your starting point is the value of assets stated in the accounts - known as the 'net book value'. These figures are then refined to reflect factors such as changes in the value of assets or bad debts.

4.  The cost of creating a business similar to yours can be used as a basis for valuation. Costs could include buying equipment, employing staff, developing products, attracting customers, and so on. It may be possible to estimate this 'entry cost' as a benchmark of your business' value. Of course, if the cost of entry is low there's little likelihood of you achieving a successful sale.

In some industries, there are established criteria for valuing businesses, eg by the number of branches an estate agency has.

A potential buyer may use more than one method to get a range of values for your business. In the end, however, any price will be a matter for negotiation.


Pneumonic:  MADE
Multiple of Earnings
Asset Valuation
Discounted Cashflow
Entry Cost


http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?r.s=sc&r.l1=1073861225&r.lc=en&r.l3=1074410825&r.l2=1074400490&r.i=1074411173&type=RESOURCES&itemId=1074411241&r.t=RESOURCES

Investment Club Performance

Investment clubs serve many useful functions.
  • They encourage savings. 
  • They educate their members about financial markets.
  • They foster friendhsips and social ties.

 Unfortunately, their investments do not beat the market. 


Ref:  Barber, Brad, and Terrance Odean, 
"Too many cooks spoil the profits:  Investment Club Performance." 
Financial Analysts Journal, Jan/Feb 2000, 17-25

Using data from a large discount brokerage firm, Barber and Odean looked at the performance of 166 investment clubs over the period 1991 through 1997.  They found that these clubs tended to purchase high-beta, small-cap growth stocks and had an average holding period of about 18 months.  They found that 60% of the clubs underperformed the market, by an average of 3.7 percentage points per year.

"What do you think of the market?"

Perhaps the most common investment question is "What do you think of the market?"
  • To an informed group of market analysts, the question invites intellectual discussion and is very difficult to answer succinctly. 
  • In casual conversation with friends, however, the question can be like an overused pickup line at a cocktail party.

Expectations about the future are extremely important in the determination of security prices.  Even if you are a firm believer in the efficient market hypothesis, it is difficult to make informed investment decisions with complete disregard for:
  • the current level of the popular indexes or
  • the prospects for the economy. 
The Greenspan Model

The Greenspan Model is a heuristic many people use as one means of estimating the over- or under- valuation of the broad market.  The model is simple:  just subtract the S&P 500 earnings yield from the current yield on a 10-year Treasury security.

Greenspan market value = 10-year Treasury yield - S&P 500 earnings yield

When the result is positive, the market is overvalued. 

When it is negative, the market is undervalued.

According to the Greenspan model, the broad stock market was overvalued for the entire decade of the 1990s.  There were buying opportunity in 2003 and 2004, but in the mid-2005 stocks were starting to get pricey again.

As with historical PE ratios or earnings yield figures, the Greenspan model offers some historical indication of the reasonableness of the current level of the market, given estimated earnings and the interest rate environment.

Latexx keeps up the pace






Current Price (10/30/2009): 2.67
(Figures in Malaysian Ringgits)

Recent Stock Performance:
1 Week -2.9%
13 Weeks 32.8%
4 Weeks 39.8%
52 Weeks 734.4%


Latexx's price has moved up steadily.  The stock was the second highest gainer on Bursa Malaysia between Jan 1 and Oct 30, up 456% from 48 sen.

CIMB forecasts Latexx's net profit to sustain a surge to RM 82 million or earnings per share (EPS) of 42.1 sen next year, up 58% from a forecast net profit %M 51.9 million (EPS of 26.7 sen) this year.

The investment bank has projected a traget price of RM 3.97 before the end of next year.  The stock closed at RM 2.44 last Thursday.

The Edge Malaysia November 9th, 2009

The importance of not buying shares near the top of the market peaks

Stock prices can be very volatile.

The price movements even within a year can be considerable (the average is 38 per cent).

The minimum movement within a year is still 19 per cent from the highest to the lowest price which is about 6 times greater than the average dividend yield of 3 per cent. 

This means that price changes can very quickly wipe out any return provided by dividend. 

This means that the value of one's investment can vary considerably from year to year.  One must be able to sustain such losses if one wishes to invest in shares.

Therefore, if we buy our shares when the market is at a reasonable level (that is when the index is around the trend line or below), we can rely on the long term rising trend to obtain our gain from the market. 

Unless we buy shares near the top of the peaks, we should be able to profit from buying shares after a few years.  It is therefore important to go for the long run.

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Good fundamental reasoning is important. Guts too!

Forty-four billion reasons to support the bull market
Warren Buffett has just made his biggest investment ever in buying Burlington Northern Railroad Company in the US.

By Alan Steel
Published: 1:21PM GMT 06 Nov 2009


Alan Steel The two big differences between Warren Buffett and the thousands of pessimists predicting our financial demise is that he puts his hard earned cash on the line, and he is usually right.

Warren Buffett, in buying Burlington Northern Railroad Company in the US has just made his biggest investment ever. All said and done the business came with a $44 billion price tag.

He said he’s betting on an out and out recovery in the US economy and he is focusing, as all good investors should, on the medium to long term.

Meanwhile, pessimists are pulling their money out of equity funds and piling into fixed interest bonds.

So no doubt they will not only be dismayed by Warren Buffett’s move, but also by Cisco CEO’s statement on Thursday which ignited US stockmarkets. He stands alongside his counterparts at Apple, Amazon and Intel by stating “the quarter was very strong and the recovery is gaining momentum”.

Further good news comes from the US Institute for Supply and Management who reckon the US GDP is likely now growing at an annualised rate of 4.5pc. Workers’ productivity also offers a guide.

This week the US Labour Department said output per hour of non farm workers rose at an annual rate of 9.5pc in the quarter, more than four times the average productivity growth rate of the last 25 years. Taking that together with the previous quarter’s 6.9pc, it’s the strongest productivity growth rate over any six month period since 1961.

All of this, plus the continued scepticism among experts and ordinary investors, tells us to expect a continuing worldwide stockmarket recovery.

Alan Steel is chairman of Alan Steel Asset Management

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/6514334/Forty-four-billion-reasons-to-support-the-bull-market.html

Commercial property values prompt fears of a bubble

Commercial property values prompt fears of a bubble
Concerns that the UK property market is entering a bubble have been exacerbated after new data showed yields have returned to 2006 levels after seeing their biggest monthly decline since 1993 in October.

By Graham Ruddick, City Reporter (Automotive, Healthcare, Property)
Published: 7:56PM GMT 06 Nov 2009

Yields, which measure rental returns against the value of a property and are a useful barometer of risk appetite, fell below 5pc for prime retail properties in October, below 6pc for offices, and 7pc for industrial property, according to BNP Paribas Real Estate. An overall fall of 35 basis points was the biggest since 1993, Cushman & Wakefield said.

There are fears that property values are recovering too quickly because of a lack of supply and strong overseas demand.

Segro, the warehouse owner, on Friday sold its Great Western Industrial Park in Southall, West London for £110.4m to the Universities Superannuation Scheme at a yield of 6.9pc.

Price is not the issue here



Lachlan Murdoch outmuscles Russell Crowe: Master and Commander star fails to land £12m Sydney house

Lachlan Murdoch, the eldest son of Rupert Murdoch, chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, has paid a record A$23m (£12.7m) for a home in Sydney, Australia, after seeing off a host of stars in an auction.

By Graham Ruddick, City Reporter
Published: 8:50PM GMT 06 Nov 2009


The property is the French government?s former consulate in Sydney?s exclusive eastern suburbs Mr Murdoch beat nine other bidders to secure the property, named 'Le Manoir’, including actor Russell Crowe and actress Nicole Kidman.

The property is the French government’s former consulate in Sydney’s exclusive eastern suburbs. It is a six-bedroom residence with panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean as well as a tennis court, swimming pool, five bathrooms, two studies, a guest powder room and a three-car garage.

The French government paid just A£26,000 for the property in 1956.

Bidding for the property, which lasted 10 minutes, opened at A$18m and bidders were asked to pay a refundable deposit of A$50,000 before the auction began.

The acquisition is thought to be the most expensive home purchase in Australia this year. Mr Murdoch and his wife, a television presenter and former model, are expecting their third child. He leads investment group Illyria Pty.

When should a stock be sold?

In a portfolio of good quality stocks bought at fair or bargain price, there are usually few reasons for selling.  However, the businesses of these companies need to be tracked regularly and their quarterly results announcements followed.

 
When should a stock be sold?  

 
Firstly, if the fundamentals of the stock are deteriorating, the stock should be sold urgently. 

Another good reason would be when the stock is overpriced.
  • Be alert when the PE of the stock has risen by more than 50% above its usual average PE. 
  • Reappraise the fundamentals and valuations of this stock, in particular, its future earnings growth potential. 
It maybe timely to cash out on a portion or all of a stock if
  • the present high PE cannot be justified or
  • if the present high PE has run ahead of the fundamentals of the stock.

Berkshire Hathaway's 3Q net income triples to US$3.24b

Berkshire Hathaway's 3Q net income triples to US$3.24b

Tags: Berkshire Hathaway | Warren Buffett

Written by Reuters
Saturday, 07 November 2009 08:14

NEW YORK: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc on Friday, Nov 6 said quarterly earnings tripled, as rising stock markets boosted its investment holdings and a quiet hurricane season contributed to higher insurance profit, according to Reuters.

Results were announced three days after Buffett revealed the biggest acquisition in his 44 years running Berkshire, a US$26 billion takeover of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. Berkshire had already owned 23 percent of the nation's second-largest railroad operator.

Third-quarter net income for Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire rose to US$3.24 billion, or US$2,087 per Class A share, from US$1.06 billion, or US$682, a year earlier.

Excluding investments, operating profit fell less than 1 percent to US$2.06 billion, or US$1,325 per share, from US$2.07 billion, or US$1,335. On that basis, analysts expected profit of US$1,308.25 per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Revenue rose 7 percent to US$29.9 billion, though Berkshire said the effects of a global recession hurt results for several manufacturing, apparel and retailing units, as some customers "dramatically" reduced spending.

"These operating subsidiaries are so sensitive to the economic climate," said Bill Bergman, an analyst at MorningstarInc in Chicago. "It will be worth watching."

Berkshire's growing diversification has made it more of a bellwether for the U.S. economy. Its roughly 80 operating units sell such things as Geico car insurance, Dairy Queen ice cream, Benjamin Moore paint and Fruit of the Loom underwear.

Insurance underwriting profit more than quadrupled to $363 million, helped mainly by reinsurance operations and despite a decline at Geico, while insurance investment income rose 21 percent to US$976 million. Results benefited from the quietest Atlantic hurricane season in more than a decade. Only a single named storm, Claudette, made U.S. landfall.

Operating profit in noninsurance businesses, in contrast, fell 28 percent to US$774 million.

Berkshire also benefited as rising stock markets boosted the value of investments in companies such as Coca-Cola Co, Goldman Sachs Group Inc, Procter & Gamble Co and Wells Fargo & Co.

Results included US$1.18 billion of investment and derivatives gains, mainly from derivatives contracts tied to junk bond credit quality and to a lesser extent to performance of four stock indexes in the United States, Europe and Japan.

Berkshire's book value ended September at US$126.07 billion, or US$81,247 per share, up 10 percent from three months earlier and 15 percent from year end.


Buffett often touts book value, which reflects assets minus liabilities, as a good gauge of Berkshire's health.

Steven Check, who oversees Check Capital Management in Costa Mesa, California, noted that book value is 4 percent higher than at the start of 2008, despite a 27 percent drop in the Standard & Poor's 500. "Buffett has made back everything he lost in 2008, and then some," he said. - Reuters

Mohd Nadzmi launches takeover of Transocean

Flash Mohd Nadzmi launches takeover of Transocean
Written by Joseph Chin
Friday, 06 November 2009 17:56

KUALA LUMPUR: TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS BHD [] chairman and managing director Datuk Mohd Nadzmi Mohd Salleh has launched a takeover of the loss-making logistics company by offering RM1 per share.

The takeover of Transocean will be undertaken by Kumulan Kenderaan Malaysia Bhd (KKMB), which is controlled by Nadzmi.

Transocean share price surged 21 sen to 86.5 sen on Friday, Nov 6 before it was suspended at 3.41pm. Trading in Transocean will resume on Monday, Nov 9 at 9am.

KKMB said it had proposed to acquire 100% stake in Lengkap Suci Sdn Bhd, which owns 11.6 million shares of Transocean or 28.29%, for a cash consideration of RM2. The shares in Lengkap Suci are to be acquired from Zaharah Ibrahim and Reena Nizma Zuhdi.

Upon completion of the proposed sales and purchase agreement (SPA), KKMB and parties acting in concert would see their collective shareholding increase to more than 33%.

"Accordingly, upon the SPA becoming unconditional and in compliance with the Malaysian Code on Take-overs and Mergers, 1998, KKMB has further informed the company that KKMB intends to make a take-over offer to acquire all the remaining Transocean shares not already held by KKMB and the parties acting in concert at a cash consideration of RM1 per share," it said.

Mohd Nadzmi indirectly controls 100% or 45 million shares of KKMB while the direct stake in KMMB is held by Nadicorp Holdings Sdn Bhd.

He was appointed chairman and managing director of Transocean on Oct 1. He is also chairman of PROTON HOLDINGS BHD [].

Transocean posted net loss of RM1.19 million on the back of RM10.43 million in revenue in 4Q ended May 31.

For the financial year ended May 31, its net loss was RM2.53 million on the turnover of RM45.18 million. Its net asset per share was 64 sen. It had borrowings of RM18.16 million

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/153165-flash-mohd-nadzmi-launches-takeover-of-transocean.html