The Simple Idea
High quality earnings = Profit that is backed by real cash and is sustainable into the future.
Low quality earnings = Profit that comes from accounting tricks, one‑time events, or non‑cash items – and may not repeat.
Think of it like a fruit tree:
High quality = The tree produces fruit every year without extra work.
Low quality = You borrowed fruit from next year’s harvest – looks good today, but tomorrow there’s nothing.
High Quality Earnings – Characteristics
| Feature | What it means |
|---|---|
| Cash-backed | Most of the reported profit has already turned into cash in the bank. |
| Recurring | Comes from normal business operations, not one‑time sales or asset sales. |
| Low accruals | The accrual ratio is low (close to zero or negative). |
| Conservative accounting | The company doesn’t stretch rules to make profit look better. |
| Predictable | Investors can trust that next quarter’s profit will be similar. |
Example: A grocery store sells bread for cash. Every day, cash in the till matches the day’s profit. High quality.
Low Quality Earnings – Characteristics
| Feature | What it means |
|---|---|
| Not cash-backed | Profit is reported, but cash hasn’t arrived yet (or never will). |
| One‑time boosts | Selling a building, a legal settlement, or a tax refund. |
| High accruals | Accrual ratio above 0.3 or 0.4 – profit is mostly “paper”. |
| Aggressive accounting | Recognizing sales too early, delaying expense recognition. |
| Unpredictable | Next quarter’s profit could collapse when accruals reverse. |
Example: A software company signs a 5‑year contract for RM1 million, records all RM1 million as profit today – but the customer pays only RM200,000 per year. The profit looks huge, but cash arrives slowly. Low quality.
How the Accrual Ratio Tells You Which Is Which
Remember the formula:
Accrual Ratio = (Net Income − Operating Cash Flow) ÷ Average Total Assets
| Accrual Ratio | Meaning | Earnings Quality |
|---|---|---|
| Close to 0 or negative | Profit ≈ Cash flow | High quality |
| 0.1 – 0.3 | Moderate gap | Medium quality – watch carefully |
| Above 0.3 (e.g., 0.39) | Profit significantly exceeds cash flow | Low quality – warning sign |
According to Professor Sloan’s research, such companies often see weaker future profits because the accruals eventually reverse (customers don’t pay, or bills come due).
Real‑World Example You Can Understand
High Quality Earnings – A Barber Shop
Cuts hair for cash. At the end of the day, cash in drawer = profit.
Accrual ratio ~0.
Low Quality Earnings – A Construction Company
Signs a RM10 million contract. Records RM5 million profit immediately, but customer will pay over 3 years.
Profit looks great this year, but cash is much lower.
If the customer delays payment, profit stays on paper but the company can’t pay its workers.
Why Investors Care
High quality earnings → reliable dividends, stable share price, lower risk.
Low quality earnings → risk of a sudden profit drop, share price collapse, or even accounting scandals.
Example: Yahoo Finance flagged a company's accrual ratio of 0.39 – it’s a red flag that earnings may be lower quality than they appear.
The Bottom Line in One Sentence
High quality earnings = profit you can touch (cash).
Low quality earnings = profit you can only see on paper (accruals) – and might disappear later.
======
Accrual Ratio
The Standard Formula (Professor Sloan)
Accrual Ratio (standard) = (Net Profit − Net Operating Cash Flow) ÷ Average Total Assets
Example using simple numbers:
Net Profit = RM100
Net Operating Cash Flow = RM60
Using Average Total Assets = RM500:
Accrual Ratio -= (100 − 60) ÷ 500 = 40 ÷ 500 = 0.08 (or 8%)
“How material are accruals relative to the size of the business?”
Usually between −0.2 and +0.2 for healthy companies; above 0.3 is a warning.
Why the Standard Formula Uses Total Assets
Professor Sloan chose average total assets as the denominator to:
Scale the accrual amount to the company’s size – a RM40 accrual matters more for a small company (assets RM100) than a giant (assets RM1,000).
Allow comparison between different companies (small vs large).
