Thursday, 8 July 2010

Margin of safety

The margin of safety is the difference between the intrinsic value of a security and its current market price.

Expanded Definition
Benjamin Graham and David Dodd coined the term "margin of safety" in their 1936 book., Security Analysis. It was also featured in Graham's The Intelligent Investor.

Value investing, which was first described by Graham and Dodd, seeks to buy companies at a discount to their intrinsic value. But a company's intrinsic value, which judges not just the current value of the company but the future value of the company, depends on several variables that can at best be estimated. Therefore, the value investor builds in a margin of safety: the difference between the company's intrinsic value and the market value that would have to exist before the value investor would trust that he or she was truly buying at a discount.

For example, in order to buy a particular security, an investor might require that the market price be 30% below the intrinsic value. This margin of safety would ensure that, even if his calculated intrinsic value were wrong, he would likely not have overpaid.

The margin of safety, in other words, is a way of managing the risk inherent in valuing and buying securities. Investors will often require a smaller margin of safety from an established company with a competitive advantage, for example, than for one in a new and growing industry. As Warren Buffett once quipped, "It is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong."

Example
If shares of Danneskjöld Repossessions (Nasdaq: FAKE) currently trade for $75, but the intrinsic value of the shares is $100, then the margin of safety is 25%. On a related note, the potential upside on the shares is 33%.


http://wiki.fool.com/Margin_of_safety?source=iabsitlnk0000001

CIMB monitoring SJAM

Thursday July 8, 2010

CIMB monitoring SJAM



KUALA LUMPUR: CIMB Group Holdings Bhd is monitoring the situation at SJ Asset Management Sdn Bhd (SJAM), which is currently being examined by the Securities Commision (SC) due to irregularities in its accounts.
Chief executive officer Datuk Seri Nazir Razak said: “We are concerned about this.
CIMB Bank Group Chief Executive Datuk Seri Nazir Razak delivering his keynote address at the CIMB Private Banking Conference 2010 on Wednesday.
SJAM was one of two fund managers our private bankers had recommended to clients and by extension, some of them had invested in the asset management company.”
Asked if the investment by CIMB clients placed in SJAM was high, Nazir said high was a relative number. “The key thing is that even if it was one sen placed in SJAM, it’s our clients’ money.”
Beyond these facts, Nazir said he did not know more, except that the SC was examining SJAM’s records and that independent auditors had been called in to look closer at its accounts

Wednesday, 7 July 2010

Performance at a Glance: Petronas Dagangan

Performance at a Glance:  Petronas Dagangan
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AuRRzs61sKqRdFpXVkdlVVlEWVc3dVg0aWJ6bExnNVE&authkey=CJmRvZsI&hl=en&output=html

Stock Performance Chart for Petronas Dagangan Berhad

Why stay invested during market declines




Click here for an enlarged version

Stay Invested
For long-term investors, staying invested makes more sense than moving in and out of the market at the first sign of bad news.

Over the past 60 years, bull markets have lasted longer (42 months on average) than bear markets (14 months on average) and have more than made up for the periodic market declines.
Bull markets have begun during economic recessions and expansions and at all level of rates.  And while it is impossible to predict when a bull market will begin, it is possible to miss one by waiting on the sidelines.

Federal fund rates
The interest rate at which private banks lend money for overnight loans.  The Fed generally raises the target federal funds rate to slow economic growth and lowers the rate to facilitate growth.

Tuesday, 6 July 2010

OSK Research maintains TP of RM13 for Public Bank

OSK Research maintains TP of RM13 for Public Bank
Written by OSK Research
Tuesday, 06 July 2010 08:52

KUALA LUMPUR: OSK Research is maintaining its target price of RM13 for PUBLIC BANK BHD [], which implies a return on equity of 26% and price-to-book value multiplier of 3.80 times.

It said on Tuesday, July 6 the current share price implies a relatively conservative 22% ROE vs management’s three-year targets of 30%.

“More intensive capital usage and greater focus on capital light high ROE, as well as high fee income are expected to help sustain the group’s robust profit generation trend,” it said.

OSK Research said the risk of potentially onerous regulatory core equity capital requirements has been overplayed as the possible dilution is less than 10% on a worst-case scenario.

“Investors should focus on the group’s agility in meeting such requirements from its excess reserves given its strong and stable asset quality and minimal exposure to derivatives, trading and off-balance sheet instruments,” it said.


http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/169259-osk-research-maintains-tp-of-rm13-for-public-bank.html

Kuok's Wilmar International - More money was natural sweetener

More money was natural sweetener
July 6, 2010

KUOK Khoon Hong is clearly far more loved by the Singaporean sharemarket than CSR is locally. How else to explain why CSR's surprise $1.75 billion sale of its namesake sugar business to Kuok's Wilmar International yesterday added almost $800 million to the market value of his company, yet added barely $80 million to the seller, which is pocketing a lot more cash than it had expected?

Wilmar wrong-footed China's Bright Food, which had been bidding since January, by offering more money. Kuok's team was apparently so confident that it had Minter Ellison partner Leigh Brown, who specialises in advising clients on Asian deals, register a corporate structure here last Thursday.

Kuok is these days ranked as Singapore's third-richest man, with about $US3.5 billion ($A4.2 billion), according to Forbes, although he still has some catching up to do on uncle Robert Kuok's $US13.5 billion.

Most of his wealth comes from Wilmar, which is worth $S38 billion ($A34 billion) and now claims the title of Asia's largest agribusiness group. Wilmar was put together by Kuok, with assets from Uncle Robert, business partner and grain trader Martua Sitorus, and the Chinese grain business of Illinois-based Archer Daniels Midland. It has been a profitable exercise for all (and for Kuok's broker mate Peter Lim, who is now a billionaire after putting $10 million into the compliance listing in 2006), and Kuok is well-liked in his home town.

There are critics of Wilmar on the environmental front because its palm oil operations in Indonesia are viewed as contributing to the endangerment of orangutan habitats. The company has strenuously defended its practices.

Wilmar already had a minor presence in sugar in Australia after buying the Brisbane Sugar Terminal in a joint venture last year, but it will now own not just a vertically integrated producing business but a big foothold in the pantries of Australian households - and a great launching pad for meeting increasing demand in China and other developing Asian nations.

The biggest hurdle the deal faces is clearing the Foreign Investment Review Board, which is really only a cypher for government policy. When Shanghai's Bright Food first made its initial $1.5 billion offer for the CSR business in mid-January, the deal was caught up in a whiff of xenophobia over state-owned entities buying more of the Australian ''farm''.

Wilmar's purchase does not carry any of that baggage, although Treasurer Wayne Swan and Prime Minister Julia Gillard will be keenly conscious of public opinion when they consider whether to approve the sale, given the deal's proximity to the federal election and the pivotal role Queensland electorates will play in the outcome.

CSR chairman Ian Blackburne and interim chief executive Jeremy Sutcliffe also get to pop along to the annual meeting in a couple of days armed with much better news than having to vote on the contentious plan to float the sugar unit as a separate company.

The trick now will be to harvest enough of the sale money to ensure that the courts and public are satisfied CSR is properly providing for potential victims of its now defunct asbestos operations.

They can now say that some time later this year, once the asbestos issue has been resolved, the company will be thinking about what the most tax-effective reward will be for investors - it may be more complicated than a capital return because it will depend on how the Tax Office views proceeds from the sale.

Already CSR is budgeting for about $150 million in costs. Much of that will be capital gains tax, followed by legal fees, although a substantial amount will be in the form of success fees to Lazard and UBS, which ran the sale (Goldman Sachs dropped out of the game earlier this year).

The sale had a few other interesting outcomes. Someone in the Bright Food camp clearly believed it was the right strategy to leak details of its offer to the media over the weekend, possibly hoping that publicising its decision to bid a lower price than the $1.75 billion mooted in April would clear the field of rivals.

In the end, they must have felt a little silly when CSR chief Sutcliffe made the courtesy phone call yesterday morning telling them they had been beaten by Wilmar (he had already rung Kuok's office). Asked about the Bright Food leak, Sutcliffe referred to the preparedness of some to breach confidentialities.

He also made repeated references to the ''uncertainty'' in Bright Food's offer, without ever spelling out whether that reflected the bid's conditions or CSR's reading of conditions in the FIRB and Canberra on what hoops a state-owned entity might have to jump through.

The second beneficial outcome is that we have, hopefully, been saved from the listing of a company called ''Sucrogen'' - which sounds more like an artificial sweetener than the real thing.

Sucrogen boss Ian Glasson, who was hoping to head up his own listed company if it had instead floated, probably disagrees.

Finally, ANZ chief Mike Smith will no doubt be congratulating Glenn Porritt and his mergers and acquisitions team, which was the successful advisory team for Wilmar. As long as there are no hitches, a relationship with the Kuoks will not hurt his Asian expansion ambitions for the bank.

Source: The Age

Biggest obstacle to Najib: The NEM's enemy within

The NEM’s enemy within
Written by Commentary by R B Bhattacharjee
Tuesday, 18 May 2010 00:00


"WHEN the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) hits inevitable challenges and setbacks, we the government and all Malaysians must remind ourselves of what is really at stake here and continue to stay the course."

This line, from the closing of the executive summary of the GTP Roadmap carries a foreboding of the resistance that can be expected when the New Economic Model (NEM) is formally adopted. If things go as planned, the new blueprint will be launched in the latter part of 2010.

The people who would most strenuously object to the new rules of the game are those who have enjoyed a privileged existence, drawing their lifeblood from an opaque administrative system. They are not in the lower rungs of society, the folk who have gained more equitable access to education, scholarships, vocational training, small loans and business licences that were undreamt of just one generation ago.

The interested parties are those who have been controlling the stakes based on know-who rather than merit. As the beneficiaries of the status quo, they can be expected to vote against the GTP, that is working to bring the socio-economic delivery system out of its father-knows-best past into a future where the most deserving will be helped and the fittest will survive.

Of course, it would be expedient for this privileged coterie to agitate the masses against the impending changes in the name of protecting the people’s rights. In the confusion, they hope the rakyat will not see that these vested interests are merely seeking to perpetuate their access to the country’s bountiful assets.

Now, the game is up. Serious cracks in the national edifice have developed because of entrenched abuse of the New Economic Policy (NEP) platform. Perhaps the most glaring symptom of our dysfunctional economic growth is the disparity between the rich and poor, which is the highest in Southeast Asia, according to the UN Human Development Report. The fissures in society have grown so visible that there is no point living in denial any more.

Stunned by the people’s verdict in the 12th general election, the government has been galvanised to respond. The result is the GTP, which identifies six National Key Result Areas (NKRAs), where the need is most pressing to show improvements before Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s administration faces the people in the next general election.

The hidden obstacles facing Najib can be discerned by two aspects of the transition from the NEP and its permutations to the much-heralded NEM. One is the tentative manner in which the new policy direction is being announced, and two is the reactionary noises that are emerging in response to its approaching launch.

When unveiling Part 1 of the NEM in March, Najib outlined three main goals of the policy: turn Malaysia into a high-income economy, ensure all communities benefit from the country’s wealth and strive for sustainable economic growth through efficiency and fiscal discipline. Part 2 of the NEM would follow after public feedback for two months and will be announced at the launching of the 10th Malaysia Plan in June.

As part of the consultation process, a National Key Economic Areas (NKEAs) workshop for some 800 representatives from a cross-section of the economy was held in Kuala Lumpur last week. At this event, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Idris Jala, who is CEO of Pemandu, the unit overseeing the implementation of the administration’s Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), walked the participants through the feedback process, which was aimed at obtaining industry forecasts of expected growth rates for the top 30 contributors to the GDP in the next decade.

Among the questions that followed was one from Centre for Public Policy Studies chairman Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam, who asked what the basic assumptions were on which to make the forecasts. Growth projections may change significantly depending on changes in policy direction, for example.

Expanding on this point to The Edge Financial Daily in a phone interview later, Navaratnam said that since the NEM chiefly involves a major shift in economic strategy, wouldn’t the forecast be very different after the NEM is introduced?

What appears to be a disconnect between economic planning and common sense can be understood when the political dimension is added to the mix. To legitimise the NEM, Najib needs to build a broad consensus for its radically different direction. This is in order to neutralise the ethnocentric right wing that seems to be singleminded in its mission to keep the race-based agenda alive.

Ironically for Najib, the biggest obstacle that could stop him from claiming his place in history as the leader who reinvented Malaysia is the enemy within.

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/169190-stocks-to-watch-three-a-lafarge-gentingm-gaming.html

Sunday, 4 July 2010

UK House prices: is it time to buy or sell?

House prices: is it time to buy or sell?
The housing market's recovery is under threat, so it could be time to act before it's too late.

Cartoon of couple outside estate agent - House prices: is it time to buy or sell?
Photo: HOWARD McWILLIAM
The property market may be Britain's national obsession but it is proving a hard market to call. Despite fears of a second credit crisis, house prices have recovered to within about 15pc of their peak and the latest figures show that the market is still rising, albeit slowly.
"The market is finely balanced. There are similar numbers of buyers and sellers, and no one can say which way prices will go," said Jeremy Leaf, a north London estate agent. "The market has never been more interesting – in some areas it may be time to sell, in others the right time to buy."
So how can you navigate your way through this jungle? How can sellers pick the right time to put their property on the market, and how can buyers make sure that they pay the right price and don't find themselves saddled with unaffordable debts?
For many, the most important factor in deciding whether now is a good time to buy is the likely direction of house prices. The consensus among economists and housing experts is that the recovery is running out of steam, and that prices look set to stall at best and fall at worst. Such pessimism is fuelled by public sector cuts, further job losses and fears of Britain falling back into recession.
Ed Stansfield of Capital Economics said: "Low interest rates should be supportive for house prices. But public sector job losses, tax rises and spending cuts will squeeze household incomes further, as well as denting confidence.
"What's more, the uncertain outlook for mortgage funding means that the availability of mortgage credit is unlikely to improve and could even be tightened again later this year. Given that the market remains overvalued, I suspect that house prices will end 2010 down by 5pc and will drop a further 10pc in 2011."
Hetal Mehta, the senior economic adviser to the Ernst & Young Item Club, said: "It is not looking good for the housing market ... we may be at a turning point." Howard Archer of IHS Global Insight said he would "not be surprised" if house prices were flat overall for the rest of this year and Peter Bolton King, the head of the National Association of Estate Agents, predicted a similar outcome.
Others predict a sharper correction. After all, as a multiple of earnings, housing remains far more expensive than the long-term average.
According to Nationwide Building Society's house price index, the average first-time buyer now needs 4.4 years' income before tax to buy their first home. Nationwide's average price to earnings ratio since 1983 is just 3.3. By this measure of affordability, prices would have to fall by 28pc from their current level to reach the long-term average for first-time buyers.
Interest rates are also critical, both for their influence on house prices and for the affordability of your own mortgage. A Reuters poll of 61 economists last month found that the majority expected no rise in rates this year, followed by an increase to 0.75pc by the end of the first quarter of 2011 and a further rise to 2pc by the end of the year. Once Bank Rate starts to creep up, history suggests that lenders will swiftly follow suit by increasing mortgage rates.
Ros Altmann, a governor of the London School of Economics, said the small print in the emergency Budget suggested that the Government expected rates to rise too. "The Government's change of pension indexation – pensions will be linked to the Consumer Price Index [CPI] measure of inflation instead of the Retail Price Index [RPI] in order to save costs – confirms that the Government itself expects rates to rise," she said. "CPI will be lower than RPI only if rates go up."
But Mr Stansfield said he expected rates still to be at their current 0.5pc at the end of 2011. "The scale of the fiscal squeeze is likely to ensure that economic growth remains pretty fragile and ensure that the economy continues to operate with ample spare capacity. That will push inflation lower and allow the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee to keep interest rates at current levels until at least the end of next year," he said.
For would-be sellers it seems a bigger gamble to hold off in the hope that the housing market will continue to improve than to sell now following a recovery in house prices and an improvement (for the time being) in mortgage lending conditions.
"There has been an increase in the supply of property coming to the market following the abolition of home information packs," said Simon Rubinsohn, the chief economist of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS). "As a result, the number of new instructions being received by estate agents is now outstripping the increase in buyer interest."
The advice to buyers is to drive a hard bargain. The recovery has not brought the housing market back to the boom days and many sellers will be fearful of a housing slump.
"Some areas have oversupply, others have shortages, although sometimes only of particular types of property," said Mr Leaf, who is also a housing spokesman for the RICS. "To find out what is happening in the area where you want to buy, there is no substitute for doing the legwork. Walk the streets at different times to make sure it is right for you. View plenty of properties, make offers, gauge the reaction – sometimes you find out more from rejections."
There is another reason why now might be the optimum time to dabble in the housing market – mortgage rates are at a seven-year low.
You can avoid a nasty rise in your mortgage repayments when interest rates do rise by choosing a fixed-rate home loan. Although these mortgages tend to be more expensive than variable-rate trackers, you can pay less than 4pc for two-year fixes, while those who want certainty for longer could fix for 10 years at 4.99pc from Yorkshire Building Society, although you would need a 25pc deposit.
There are tentative signs that the mortgage market is worsening and so it might pay to act fast. The Bank of England said on Thursday that mortgages would be harder to obtain in the next three months amid fears of a "deterioration in the economic outlook". It said lenders expected to find it harder to secure the cash on the wholesale markets to fund loans. This was the pivotal reason why mortgages became so costly at the height of the credit crisis.
House price bears reckon that many home owners could not cope with a rise in interest rates. Some, they say, are able to keep their heads above water today only because they are paying rock-bottom interest rates – as low as 2.5pc, in some cases. But these borrowers are fully exposed to a rise in Bank Rate, while remortgaging to a fix will see their repayments rise immediately. A tick up in repossessions cannot be ruled out.
For now, the housing and mortgage markets are in as good health as they have been since the credit crunch took hold, but the outlook looks decidedly grim.
Someone with access to funding who could cope with a rise in interest rates might be able to grab a bargain by choosing the area and property type carefully. Existing home owners whose finances are stretched to the limit might equally take the opportunity provided by the current resilience in prices to get out of the market before prices fall.

Saturday, 3 July 2010

Double-dip fears as US recovery falters

Double-dip fears as US recovery falters

Fears that the US is about to drag the rest of the world into a double-dip recession gripped investors by the throat this week, plunging markets into a dark frame of mind.


Markets have had a rollercoaster week as optimism about the strength of the US recovery ebbs.
Markets have had a rollercoaster week as optimism about the strength of the US recovery ebbs.
It was a shocking week for equities, which plummeted on a slew of bad news. The FTSE 100 closed at 4838.09 on Friday, up 0.7pc on the day but down 4.1pc on the week. The German DAX was 4pc lower on the week, while France's CAC 40 and the US Dow Jones were both down 4.9pc after a week to forget.
"Markets seem to be in the mood to worry, as they contemplate what the second half of 2010 will bring," said Ian Harwood of Evolution Securities.
The focus this week switched to the US, and a string of terrible data which prompted fears that recovery in the world's largest economy is losing steam, and is about to lead the rest of the world into a double dip.
There are concerns too that growth in China is slowing and may not be able to provide sufficient support to the rest of the world. And lastly, while the fevered panic over the eurozone debt crisis, impending austerity, and social unrest has abated, anxiety has not been erased.
The bad news from the US this week included a nasty drop in consumer confidence; a fall in US non-farm payrolls; and plunging home sales. The UK, reliant on world trade to give its fragile recovery wings as it embarks on an eye-watering fiscal squeeze, would inevitably be pulled down with the US if a renewed slump took hold.
And there were signs this week that some areas of the UK economy are already becoming vulnerable to a second shock. A Bank of England report suggested British households are in store for a second credit crisis, with banks and building societies expecting to rein in lending yet again; the recovery in house prices all but stalled in June, with prices rising just 0.1pc according to Nationwide; and the manufacturing PMI indicated a sharp slowdown in exports growth in June.
It is not just the FTSE 100 which is reflecting fears of a double dip in the UK, Bank of England policymakers have given explicit warnings too.
Adam Posen, a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee, said "the renewal of a severe recession" was a very real possibility. "Much of what determines our outlook will take place beyond our borders and certainly beyond the MPC's remit," he added. Not terribly heartening.
Nor was a warning from Pimco - the world's largest bond house - that the early fiscal tightening in countries including the UK and Germany is not necessary. According to Scott Mather, Pimco's head of global portfolio management, not only is it unnecessary, but it has created a "growing risk" of sinking those economies back into the recession they are still in the process of clawing their way out of.
"There are parts of Europe where austerity wasn't called for immediately," he said, citing the two European heavyweights as examples. "It's made us bring forward our expectations for a drop in growth and a drop in inflation within the eurozone." Pimco is maintaining its underweight stance on the pound and the euro.
Whether immediate or delayed fiscal tightening is the best medicine for the UK economy is a debate which will run on in the domestic arena.
The hope, outlined in the Office for Budget Responsibility's Budget forecasts, is that as the public sector and households tighten their belts, private sector strength and demand for our goods abroad will be enough to drive recovery of around 2.5pc from 2011. Those forecasts look increasingly at risk.
"The prospects for world trade are darkening," said Stephen Lewis of Monument Securities. "In the USA, a wide range of employment and housing market statistics have pointed to weaker activity, while manufacturing, which had been relatively resilient, appeared to lose momentum last month.
"Doubtless, the other growth hub, China, is still expanding strongly, but perhaps not at quite as rapid a rate as at the start of this year. China's output does not have to contract for the rest of the world to feel the draught from its cooling economy.
Not all are convinced that a morbid fascination with a double-dip is justified, and Mr Harwood is among the optimists.
"During recent months we've become increasingly concerned that the markets are focusing less and less upon what is going right – and, crucially, what's likely to continue to go right – and, conversely, more and more upon what might go wrong," he said.
"Our own view is that such a "hard landing" outcome is unlikely and that the global economy will instead experience a continuing economic recovery, with inflation remaining low and well-behaved."
With the fate of the world economy such a huge unknown, the markets have taken fright, for there is nothing they like less than uncertainty. That point home has been hammered home to great effect this week.

Singapore Condo sold out in 1 day

March 26, 2010

Reasonable pricing and small unit sizes could be reasons for its popularity

The 76 Shenton condominium in the Central Business District sold out in one day during its preview. -- PHOTO: HONG LEONG HOLDINGS


THE 76 Shenton condominium in the Central Business District sold out in one day during its preview as hundreds of buyers made a beeline for the prime project yesterday.

There were so many people vying for one of the 202 units that balloting was needed to sort out who got first crack.

The Straits Times understands that there were about 300 names in the ballot, with the buyers mostly Singaporean investors and permanent residents.

The Hong Leong Holdings project has nothing over 1,000 sq ft: 134 one-bedroom units from 592 sq ft to 624 sq ft and 68 two-bedroom units of 968 sq ft to 975 sq ft. One-bedroom units were priced between $1,600 and $2,600 per sq ft (psf), or about $1.2 million, while two-bedroom units went for between $1,600 and $2,300 psf. That is about $2 million.

Hong Leong credited the strong sales to the development's 'prime location, its attractive pricing, a solid design and healthy pre-launch interest'.

Sources said property agents were apparently collecting cheques from keen buyers even before the project's launch.


By Esther Teo


----


W brand residences makes S'pore debut


A NEW upscale condominium that is part of the trendy 'W' boutique hotel brand has made its debut in Singapore.

The Residences at W Singapore Sentosa Cove, which boasts 228 apartments, will be priced from $2,500 to $3,000 per sq ft (psf), said City Developments (CDL) at the launch yesterday.

The record in the gated island enclave is held by Seven Palms, where nine units went for $3,100-$3,430 psf late last year. Prior to that, the record was held by Lippo Group's Marina Collection, where units fetched a median price of $2,734 psf in late 2007.

Buyers keen on W will have to pay at least $3.4 million for the smallest unit of the seven, six-storey blocks. There are two- to four-bedroom units and penthouses, all with 99-year leases, with sizes from 1,227 sq ft to 6,297 sq ft. About 40 per cent of these are two-bed and the smaller three-bed.

The development forms part of an integrated project that comprises a 240-room W Singapore Sentosa Cove hotel and 86,000 sq ft of gross commercial space for restaurants and shops. The W residences will open first, followed by the hotel and then the shops, probably by 2012.

CDL, which is releasing 60 units for the current soft launch, was behind the branded St Regis Residences in Cuscaden Road, also a collaboration with Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide. CDL managing director Kwek Leng Joo said that W was targeted at 'global jetsetters'.

The firm's group general manager, Mr Chia Ngiang Hong, said the project will be marketed overseas - in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Jakarta.

There are now nine completed W residences worldwide, eight of which are in the United States. Another 13 are in the process of being developed, said Starwood asia-pacific president Miguel Ko, with four being built in Asia, including the one at Sentosa.

Elsewhere on Sentosa, Ho Bee began the preview for its Seascape condo yesterday, and Lippo is relaunching the Marina Collection today at a price of around $2,500-$2,700 psf.

JOYCE TEO

To stop stock loss, neither a gambler nor a holder-on be

To stop stock loss, neither a gambler nor a holder-on be

MARCUS PADLEY
July 3, 2010

I RECENTLY wrote an article declaring that the biggest mistake a private investor can make is not selling. Since then I have been bombarded with questions about my own stop-loss selling strategy. So I'll tell you.

But before I do, you should know that I am possibly a little different to most of you. I have learnt to sell as easily as I buy. I am regularly in 100 per cent cash. I don't need to be in the sharemarket.

I don't need the sharemarket for a dividend income and I long ago got over the philosophy that you hold stocks forever - utopian crap - and that you can't time the market - a lazy professional's excuse for doing nick all for his money.

So, with that disclaimer, here are a few of my stop-loss strategies that you might consider for yourself.

THE HOLIDAY STOP-LOSS

I sell everything before I go on holiday. I once ruined a holiday by fretting about some dumb stock position when I should have been chasing my wife and kids around. Never again. Of course, I'm not suggesting you do that. It's just that when you have your head in the sharemarket all day every day, a holiday isn't a holiday unless you get it out.

THE INSOMNIA STOP-LOSS

I sell anything that could possibly keep me awake tonight. Sorry, but I reckon it's really dumb to be worrying about what Wall Street's going to do overnight. Let's face it. If that's your concern, then you are gambling, not investing. Utter luck is a cruel mistress and if that's what you are relying on, you have gone astray. Unless, of course, you use the sharemarket to gamble, for creating a rush. That's fine. But don't dress it up as anything clever. There's nothing clever about going to bed with your fingers crossed.

THE ANXIOUS STOP-LOSS

I sell anything that is disturbing me. I put a high value on my frame of mind. With only 252,522 days left to live, of course you can't really afford to waste any time being miserable, especially not about money, which ultimately, is all that stocks represent. Biting the heads off the kids or blowing your window of opportunity with the missus because of some dodgy stock is about as stupid as it gets. Those windows are pretty small. So if in doubt, get out.

THE OBJECTIVITY STOP-LOSS

I used to operate a stop-loss that triggered when a loss was so big I felt I wouldn't be able to tell Emma. But when I confronted her with one once it turned out she had a bigger risk appetite than I did. Embarrassing as it is, my wife has the bigger kahunas. I bottle it before she does. So that little system has become redundant. But for you, it may not be. If in doubt, discuss it with someone. When things are about as bad as they can get, you need objectivity, which means you need to talk to someone. Use someone else as your stop-loss.

THE PUNCHING THE AIR STOP-LOSS

I sell anything that provokes me to stand up at my desk and punch the air in delight. As any stockbroker will tell you, euphoria means ''Sell''. It has exceeded your expectations and asking for more is simply greed. You have to book the wins some time. This is as good a moment as any.

THE DENIAL STOP-LOSS

I sell anything I get wrong. Stocks analysis is not a science. You cannot pin down certainty. And there are so many variables and so much sentiment that getting it wrong is to be expected, is inevitable, and when you do get it wrong you have to act, not deny. There is no room for pride in stock decisions. Advisers telling clients not to sell because they couldn't admit they got things wrong in the financial crisis (pride and denial) cost billions of dollars and thousands of client relationships. We all get things wrong. Accept that and half the game - not losing money - is won.

THE SCHOOL FEES STOP-LOSS

Paying essential bills takes priority over trading, I'm afraid.

THE DIVORCE STOP-LOSS

Only triggered it once and if you can exercise the ''engagement ring thrown at you'' stop-loss effectively you'll never actually need it.

I could go on.

Marcus Padley is a stockbroker with Patersons Securities and author of the daily sharemarket newsletter Marcus Today. For a free trial, go to marcustoday.com.au

Source: The Age


Comment:  
On the other hand, there is a person I know who "lost" money each time he sold, as his sold stocks continue to go higher subsequently.

Bypassing Equity Funds, Wealthy Families Try Direct Investing

July 2, 2010
Bypassing Equity Funds, Wealthy Families Try Direct Investing

By PAUL SULLIVAN

The 2008 financial crisis had several unexpected outcomes, but one of the surprising ones was an increased willingness by wealthy families to invest directly in private companies and forgo private equity funds.

Direct investments are not going to replace private equity funds any time soon, if for no other reason than such investments are only for the very rich. Advisers suggest a net worth above $100 million to even contemplate individual, private equity investments.

Still, the world of private equity was shaken in the financial crisis, when many individual investors found their private equity investments to be a burden rather than a boon. Many either had to sell other assets to meet the demands for additional capital from private equity firms or they had to sell their stakes in the funds at steep discounts to get out early.

Though this was all laid out in the rules of the funds, a bigger issue had been raised: the investors’ lack of a voice in how private equity funds operated.

Specifically, the problem was that people with hundreds of millions of dollars were investing alongside endowments and pension funds with billions of dollars. And for probably the first time in their adult lives, these very wealthy people were being drowned out by significantly larger institutional investors.

That’s where Ward McNally, managing partner at McNally Capital, a private equity adviser, comes in. In 1997, his family sold its interests in Rand McNally, the map maker, and he began managing his family’s fortune. Shortly before the market crash, he started a company to advise his family and others on investing directly in private equity, a move he attributed to his own bad experience.

While his family had had success investing in private equity deals on their own and not within a fund, members watched in shock as three of the six units of Rand McNally that had been sold to private equity firms went bankrupt after the firms saddled the units with debt. The three that thrived had all been sold to competitors who integrated the units and ran them profitably.

This was an ah-ha moment for him. He saw where wealthy families could reprise their age-old role of investing directly in private companies and bypassing funds.

“We encourage our families to make direct investments in the area in which they made their wealth,” Mr. McNally said. “That knowledge is an incredible advantage. They can create a network of value for the company.”

At the root of the shift toward individual private equity investments is the families’ desire for control and to know exactly what was happening with their investments. But the bigger issue may be frustrated expectations. “If private equity funds kept producing outsized returns, this shift might not have taken place,” said John Rompon, managing partner at McNally Capital. “The attitude changed when distributions dried up and investors had to meet capital calls.”

A survey last month of 62 families advised by McNally Capital — with an average net worth of $250 million — showed an increased interest in single-company private equity investing. Nearly two-thirds said they now preferred to make direct investments in companies rather than using private equity funds.

Yet that same group acknowledged the risk associated with doing this: 78 percent had two or fewer people dedicated to evaluating private equity deals, and 63 percent heard about deals from friends and family members — eerily similar to how Bernard L. Madoff attracted investors.

“One thing we have found is families are insular by nature,” Mr. McNally said. “Families have a reach that exceeds their grasp. They want to accomplish more than the resources they have.”

This is the downside for direct private equity investing. Yet by directly investing, families can hold an investment for as long as they want and are not bound by fund documents that say when they have to sell an investment.

Investing directly is also a way for families to capitalize on the reputations they have from building their companies. “They want their dollar to be worth $1.06 to reflect the added value they bring to the deal,” Mr. Rompon said. “It is not reflected when you invest in a private equity fund. We try to help them be anything other than an A.T.M., which is how they feel every day.”

How popular is this approach? A recent study by Coller Capital, a private equity investment firm, said 41 percent of all private equity investors planned to increase their direct investment in the next three years.

And Dale Miller, head of wealth management solutions at Credit Suisse Private Bank, called the move to single investments an “emerging trend” that is part of clients’ overall desire for control.

“Clients are interested in being active,” he said. “On a net worth basis, clients with greater than $100 million are interested in direct investments because they can achieve diversification on their own.”

The big risk is too much enthusiasm, even when the investor knows an industry well. Theodore Beringer, a managing director at the Beringer Group, an adviser to family offices, said people making single investments needed to show restraint and properly value the company.

“You have to have discipline,” he said. “Say your limit is $15 million and you have two deals that are $12 million, you can only take one.”

But you would have complete control over which one.