Friday 25 June 2010

G20: leaders assemble as divisions emerge on whether to cut or spend

The leaders of the world's biggest economies will assemble in Toronto this weekend for a G-20 summit, amid growing tensions on how best to head off a second global recession.

 
David Cameron arrives in Canada for Friday's G-8 summit and this weekend's G-20 summit.
David Cameron arrives in Canada for Friday's G-8 summit and this weekend's G-20 summit.
The G20 summit, which starts in the Canadian capital on Saturday, comes as the Obama administration insists that governments' policies must focus on bolstering the recovery, rather than immediately tackling deficits.
“We must demonstrate a commitment to reducing long-term deficits, but not at the price of short-term growth,” US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner argued in an article in the Wall Street Journal. “Without growth now, deficits will rise further.”
By contrast, David Cameron arrives at his first major international summit days after laying out a Budgetthat put tackling Britain's record deficit at the heart of his new government's policy. Mr Cameron and his Chancellor, George Osborne, argue that a failure to reduce the deficit poses an even bigger threat to the recovery, as it will risk a Greek-style debt crisis.
The Prime Minister played down the tension with Obama, saying "this weekend isn’t about a row over fiscal policy. We all agree about the need for fiscal consolidation."
The policy headache facing governments isn't helped by the lack of consensus among experts over whether further stimulus or deficit reduction is what's required. Nobel Prize-winner Paul Krugman has warned that rapid cuts in spending and tax rises will tip the world back into a global recession and repeat the mistakes of the 1930s.

Comparing P/E ratios to growth rates can be significantly more useful than simply comparing two companies' P/E ratios. Why?

Let's compare Company A to its competitor in the same industry Company B to illustrate.

Company A

Price $10

Last year's EPS $1.16

Projected EPS  $1.33


Company B

Price $ 8

Last year's EPS  $1.14

Projected EPS  $1.14


Using the data above, you can see that Company A's trailing P/E is 8.6, while Company B's is just 7.

Why would you want to pay $10 for Company A's earnings when you can get Company B's - the same amount, no less  - for $2 off?  (You could even take the $2 to give yourself a treat. )  :-)

Which company would you buy - Company A or Company B?  Why?

Answer:  Click here.

Poorer Countries Taking Over Global Economy

June 24, 2010, 12:45 PM

Poorer Countries Taking Over Global Economy

Ten years ago, the world’s richest countries accounted for a significant majority of the globe’s economic activity. But the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
A new O.E.C.D. report finds that rich countries and poor countries now each contribute about an equal share of the global economy. And by 2030, developing countries will account for 57 percent of world G.D.P.:
DESCRIPTIONSource: O.E.C.D.Note: These data apply Angus Maddison’s long-term growth projections to his historical PPP-based estimates for 29 O.E.C.D member countries and 129 non-member economies.
“[T]he economic and financial crisis is accelerating this longer-term structural transformation in the global economy,” according to a release from the agency.
The projections are based  on research on economic growth by the late Angus Maddison, who tried to model world G.D.P. numbers going all the way back to Year 1.

Buy the rumour, sell the news goes the old adage.

Follow the market rumour

Prashant Mahesh & Nikhil Walavalkar, ET Bureau





Buy the rumour, sell the news goes the old adage. One sees this playing out in markets all the time. Share prices inch up days before a company announces its results only to correct immediately after the company declares record profits.

But recent events have shown that following rumours can prove to be quite hazardous for your financial well being. A few days ago, a leading bank’s stock saw its price tumble 3.5% during the day, on market rumours posted on a blog. Though the stock subsequently recovered with the bank denying any such thing, this has important lessons for retail investors to learn. “One of ten rumours may be true, so if you are an investor, do wait for verification before acting on the news”, says VK Sharma, head private broking & wealth management, HDFC Securities.

Get information

Today you can place orders on the broker who is sitting on a live terminal or even use the internet to trade online, and know the status of the order with every passing second. Similarly, dissemination of information has changed. In 1995, you had to rely on the newspaper or the annual report from the company for corporate information with very few having access to the internet, which was primarily used for sending e-mails only.

However, today, dissemination of information happens in nano seconds. You have wire services, websites, 24-hour television channels, blogs, corporate websites where you have a plethora of information. With the markets getting increasingly globalised, news comes from various parts of the world. The question now is: How does an investor separate the wheat from the chaff?

Types of news flows

There could be a variety of news affecting financial markets. Some could be company specific. For instance, a company wins an income-tax case in which a refund of Rs 1,000 crore is involved, which improves the cash flow of the company.

Other types of news could be macro-economic or geopolitical in nature. Take for example, Met department forecasts of rains being below normal. Such news is not specific to a company but could affect the markets.

Source of news

Follow the trail. When the news reaches you, try and identify the source of the news. If it is an official announcement, you will find it on the website of the stock exchange, where it is listed. If there is no such announcement on the exchange site, wait for the clarification from the company’s end. Large companies do come up with clarifications as soon as possible.

Investors could look for clarifications in electronic media, such as news channels and official website of the company. “In a market where many M&As are occurring, it is very easy to spread rumours. However an investors must remember that there is no free lunch”, says Sadanand Shetty, vice-president & senior fund manager, Taurus Mutual Fund.

The potential traps

There are a lot of unregulated entities who keep feeding markets with rumours, short-term and positional calls on the stock markets. If and when investors subscribe to these services, they must clearly know that these are not necessarily fundamental calls and by subscribing to these services the investor is taking a risk. These can be stock price manipulation attempts and you may be caught on the wrong side of the activity.

Also there are instances where you receive SMS’s from unknown entities giving some information about or a trading call on a stock. Be very careful before acting on the stock. Instances have been observed where volumes are created in the market, spreading information using bulk SMS service, to offload one’s position.

If you are a trader

In the short-term, markets may be affected by greed and fear, which could affect your position. So every trader needs to work with a stop loss. Besides, you should not trade a stock when adverse rumours are already floating in the market on the same. Buy on rumour and sell on news has been the norm in stock markets for a long time.

It makes sense not to act on news that has come after a long rumour mill in the market. It is likely that the impact of the development is already factored in the market price and ‘early birds’ may prefer to book their profits upon confirmation of news. In that case the stock moves contrary to the impact anticipated.

If you are an investor

As an investor you don’t have access to the company’s management at short notice. Hence whenever you invest, it is essential that you invest on the basis of company fundamentals.

If the fundamental research is right, then rumours are unlikely to affect the company and it is only a matter of time before the stock bounces back. Such temporary weakness can be used to add to your positions in the market.

Understanding Bonus Issues in our Local Market

Using the search function of my blog for 'bonus issue', I found these postings on this topic.

Oct 04, 2009
What this means in plain terms is that the typical investor who buys the stocks of a company undergoing bonus issue either just before (by basing his purchase on rumours) or just after the announcement of a bonus almost certainly ends ...
Oct 04, 2009
... is the fundamentalist one; only buy those stocks which provide you with a reasonable return and which have the prospect of providing a constant long-term growth in earnings and dividend irrespective of whether they give bonus or not.
Jan 31, 2010
As its low share liquidity was among the issues raised by investors leading to the low PER, KPJ subsequently announced proposals for a 1-into-2 share split, 1-for-4 bonus issue and 1-for-4 free warrants issue as a step to improve the ...
Apr 12, 2010
Further, the company has not encouraged unwanted speculation by going in for a stock split or bonus issues, as these measures do nothing to improve the intrinsic values. They merely are tools in the hands of mostly dishonest managements ...





Oct 03, 2009
Elsewhere, a bonus issue or a share split is treated as a non-event and nobody ever gets excited about it. At the ex-bonus date, the price automatically adjusts downward such that the value of the whole company remains the same. ...
Oct 03, 2009
It is futile to chase up the price of shares based on rumours that a particular company is about to make a bonus issue. The really wise investors or the truly cunning insiders would have got in when the price was a lot lower. ...
Oct 04, 2009
It is more than possible that a large number of bonus issues are made for the purpose of giving a temporary boost to the price of the stock. As to why any company should desire to achieve a temporary boost in the price of stocks, ...
Aug 06, 2009
SPG does not believe that bonuses increase the value of shares, and advise investors not to pay much attention to the past number of bonus issues. We look at rights in another light, however, as we are not in favour of rights issues ...





Oct 03, 2009
Whenever this happens, Malaysian speculators usually become very excited because they feel sure that a bonus issue is forthcoming since the company now has reserves which can be converted to bonus shares for distribution. ...
Sep 27, 2009
Whenever a company announces that it is making a rights issue, the market in Malaysia/Singapore, on the whole, does not react adversely especially when the right issues are accompanied by a bonus issue. The price of the company's shares ...
May 11, 2010
... narrows due to the increase in natural rubber price. "There is also the possibility of abonus issue, following in the steps taken by its peers," it said in a note on Tuesday. Posted by bullbear at 1:16 AM. Labels: Glove, hartalega ...

Comparing the P/E to Growth Rates

Answer:

Company A's forward P/E is 7.5, while Company B's remains 7.

Remember, you are more concerned with what Company A is going to do - keep growing while Company B has apparently run out of gas - than what it has already done, and you don't want to pay nearly the same amount for no earnings growth as you would for a nice 15% growth of Company A.


The above is the answer to the question posed here:

Comparing P/E ratios to growth rates can be significantly more useful than simply comparing two companies' P/E ratios. Why?

European Stocks Find Fans among U.S. Funds

European Stocks Find Fans among U.S. Funds
Posted by: Ben Steverman on June 24, 2010

Despite a fiscal crisis in Europe that is dragging stocks lower day after day, European stocks are finding enthusiastic buyers among an unlikely group: American fund managers.

That’s the clear impression from the Morningstar Investment Conference, an annual gathering in Chicago of 1,350 financial advisors, fund managers and other investing pros.

On June 24, the second day of the three-day conference, the Dax Index, a measure of the German stock market, fell 1.4%, and the Euro Stoxx 50 index, covering 50 stocks from across Europe, dropped 2.2%, bringing its year-to-date losses to a negative 10.8%.

But also on June 24, managers of global stock funds were extolling the virtues of European equities in panel discussions.

The common theme for these investors: The problems in Europe are serious, but the stock market has overreacted and many European stocks are selling at terrific discounts.

“What’s happening in Europe is of great concern,” said Franklin Mutual Series portfolio manager Philippe Brugere-Trelat, “and that’s the main reason stock markets in Europe are so cheap.”

But, he said at a panel discussion on “stock picking across the globe”: Many companies headquartered in Europe are “not European at all” in the sense that a large portion of their sales and earnings come from outside the continent.

Furthermore, the weaker euro gives a big advantage to European companies selling outside Europe. “The Euro at $1.20 is a very big cherry on the cake in terms of earnings and sales,” Brugere-Trelat said. The Euro on June 24 was trading at $1.23, down 13.9% from the beginning of 2010.

At a different panel discussion, Artisan Partners portfolio manager Mark Yockey admitted he has a relatively high exposure to European stocks — especially to financial issues that could be most vulnerable to debt problems.

However, he said, many European banks are like his holding, ING, which is one of three main banks in the Netherlands. An oligopoly like that gives ING and other similarly situated banks extra strength and staying power. “We think once things settle down they’re going to grow their earnings,” he said.

Another speaker and manager of foreign stocks on the same panel, Janus Capital Management portfolio manager Brent Lynn, said he has a relatively lower exposure to Europe but that he’s ready to start buying.

“We have more compelling valuations in Europe than I’ve seen in a number of years,” he said. The sovereign debt problems make him “worried … but intrigued by the prospect of buying high quality companies” at cheap prices.

The deals are so good that Lynn said he was considering buying domestically oriented banks in Italy and Spain, two of the most indebted European nations. His targets are “franchises that we think will be survivors.”

If investors are convinced the Europe stock slide has gone too far, this could be a great time to buy. Extending that logic, the market’s continued slide means that European stocks could be an even better deal in the future.

Referring to this, Yockey won a laugh from his audience when he said: “The opportunities are getting better and better every day.”

http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2010/06/european_stocks_find_fans_among_us_funds.html

China's chief auditor warns mounting local government debt a risk to economy

China's chief auditor has warned that high levels of local government debt could derail the country's economy, with some observers suggesting that a number of Chinese provinces are even more fiscally-troubled than Greece.

 
China's chief auditor warns that mounting local government debts could be a threat to the economy. Visitors discuss in front of a model of a real estate development at a property fair in Beijing
China's chief auditor warns that mounting local government debts could be a threat to the economy. Visitors discuss in front of a model of a real estate development at a property fair in Beijing Photo: Reuters
Liu Jiayi, the head of China's National Audit Office said the financial crisis had left some Chinese provinces with serious debt problems.
"The scale is large, and the burden is quite heavy," he said, in an annual report to the Chinese government.
Chinese provinces are, in some cases, equivalent in size to major European countries and run with a degree of fiscal autonomy. The southern province of Guangdong, for example, has the same population size as Germany.
However, provincial budgets have been classified as state secrets until now and this is the first time that China has disclosed the level of local government debt.
Mr Liu said the ratio of debt to disposable revenues at some local governments was over 100pc and in the highest case it was 365pc.
He said the audited debts of 18 of China's 22 provinces, together with 16 cities and 36 counties amounted to 2.79 trillion yuan (£279bn) in 2009.
Several observers believe the situation is far worse. The China Daily newspaper, which is run by the government, suggested that the total sum could add up to between 6 trillion and 11 trillion yuan (£590bn-£1.08 trillion).
Victor Shih, a professor at Northwestern University in the United States, believes the sum in 2009 was 11.4 trillion yuan, equivalent to 71pc of China's nominal GDP.
Mr Shih has warned that local governments have also succeeded in rapidly funnelling large amounts of debt off their balance sheet and into public-private investment vehicles.
China's banking regulator said outstanding loans from banks to local government financing vehicles was 7.38 trillion yuan at the end of 2009, rising 70pc year-on-year.
Mr Shih, who researched more than 8,000 of these "local investment companies", said that orders to ramp up spending on infrastructure after the financial crisis could leave China with widespread debt problems.
"I collected data from thousands of sources, including regulatory filings, bond-rating reports and press releases of government-bank agreements," he said, although he admitted that comprehensive data was difficult to track down.
Next year, he is forecasting government debt to hit 96pc of gross domestic product as infrastructure projects continue to eat up cash and produce negligible returns.
"The worst case is a pretty large-scale financial crisis around 2012," he said. "The slowdown would last two years and maybe longer," he added.
The US debt-to-GDP ratio is close to 90pc while Greece's is 130pc.
With Europe's debt problems in the spotlight, the Chinese government has moved to try to fix the problems in its provinces.
Earlier this month, the State Council, China's cabinet, ordered local governments to stop borrowing using special vehicles which rely solely on government income for their revenues and to shut down the public-private partnerships as soon as possible.
The State Council said local government vehicles had "in many cases illegally guaranteed the debt of those vehicles" and had "experienced some problems that demand urgent attention".
The government ordered a progress report to be completed by local governments by the end of the year.

Ben Bernanke needs fresh monetary blitz as US recovery falters

Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke is waging an epochal battle behind the scenes for control of US monetary policy, struggling to overcome resistance from regional Fed hawks for further possible stimulus to prevent a deflationary spiral.

 
Ben Bernanke needs fresh monetary blitz as US recovery falters
Ben Bernanke needs fresh monetary blitz as US recovery falters Photo: GETTY IMAGES
Fed watchers say Mr Bernanke and his close allies at the Board in Washington are worried by signs that the US recovery is running out of steam. The ECRI leading indicator published by the Economic Cycle Research Institute has collapsed to a 45-week low of -5.7 in the most precipitous slide for half a century. Such a reading typically portends contraction within three months or so.
Key members of the five-man Board are quietly mulling a fresh burst of asset purchases, if necessary by pushing the Fed's balance sheet from $2.4 trillion (£1.6 trillion) to uncharted levels of $5 trillion. But they are certain to face intense scepticism from regional hardliners. The dispute has echoes of the early 1930s when the Chicago Fed stymied rescue efforts.
"We're heading towards a double-dip recession," said Chris Whalen, a former Fed official and now head of Institutional Risk Analystics. "The party is over from fiscal support. These hard-money men are fighting the last war: they don't recognise that money velocity has slowed and we are going into deflation. The only default option left is to crank up the printing presses again."
Mr Bernanke is so worried about the chemistry of the Fed's voting body – the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) – that he has persuaded vice-chairman Don Kohn to delay retirement until Janet Yellen has been confirmed by the Senate to take over his post. Mr Kohn has been a key architect of the Fed's emergency policies. He was due to step down this week after 40 years at the institution, depriving Mr Bernanke of a formidable ally in policy circles.
The Fed's statement this week shows growing doubts about the health of the recovery. Growth is no longer "strengthening": it is "proceeding". Financial conditions are now "less supportive" due to Europe's debt crisis.
The subtle tweaks in language have been enough to set bond markets alight. The yield on 10-year Treasuries has fallen to 3.08pc, the lowest since the gloom of April 2009. Futures contracts have ruled out tightening until well into next year.
Yet the statement may understate the level of angst at the Board. New home sales crashed 33pc in May to an all-time low of 300,000 after the homebuyer tax-credit expired, confirming fears that the housing market has been propped up by subsidies. Unemployment is stuck at 9.7pc. Manufacturing capacity use is at 71.9pc. The Fed's "trimmed mean" index of core inflation is 0.6pc on a six-month basis, a record low.
"The US recovery is in imminent danger of stalling," said Stephen Lewis, from Monument Securities. "Growth could be negative again as soon as the fourth quarter. There is no easy way out since fiscal stimulus has already been pushed as far as it can credibly go without endangering US credit-worthiness."
Rob Carnell, global strategist at ING, said the Obama fiscal boost peaked in the first few months of this year. It will swing from a net stimulus of 2pc of GDP in 2010 to a net withdrawal of 2pc in 2011. "This is very substantial fiscal drag. On top of this the US Treasury is talking of a 'Just War' against the banks, which will further crimp lending. It is absolutely the wrong moment to do this."
Kansas Fed chief Thomas Hoenig dissented from Fed calls for ultra-low rates to stay for an "extended period", arguing that loose money risks asset bubbles and fresh imbalances. He recently called for interest rates to be raised to 1pc by the autumn.
While he has been the loudest critic, he is not alone. Philadelphia chief Charles Plosser says the Fed has blurred the lines of monetary and fiscal policy by purchasing bonds, acting as a Treasury without a legal mandate. Together with Richmond chief Jeffrey Lacker they represent a powerful block of opinion in the media and Congress.
Mr Bernanke has fought off calls from FOMC hawks for moves to drain stimulus by selling some of the Fed's $1.75 trillion of Treasuries, mortgage securities and agency bonds bought during the crisis. But there is little chance that he can secure their backing for further purchases at this point. "He just has to wait until everybody can see the economy is nearing the abyss," said one Fed watcher.
Gabriel Stein, from Lombard Street Research, said the US is still stuck in a quagmire because Mr Bernanke has mismanaged the quantitative easing policy, purchasing the bonds from banks rather than from the non-bank private sector.
"This does nothing to expand the broad money supply. The trouble is that the Fed does not understand broad money and ascribes no importance to it," he said. The result is a collapse of M3, which has contracted at an annual rate of 7.6pc over the last three months.
Mr Bernanke focuses instead on loan growth but this has failed to gain full traction in a cultural climate of debt repayment. The Fed is pushing on the proverbial string. The jury is out on whether or not his untested doctrine of "creditism" will work.
"We are now walking on deflationary quicksand," said Albert Edwards from Societe Generale.