Sunday, 18 September 2016

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage from the LIABILITIES IN THE BALANCE SHEET?

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage?

Financial statements are where you can search for companies with a durable competitive advantage that is going to make one super rich.


BALANCE SHEET

The balance sheet is a snapshot of the company's financial condition on the particular date that the balance sheet is generated.

Assets minus Liabilities = Net worth or Shareholders' Equity


Current Liabilities

Account Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accounts payable is money owed to suppliers that have provided goods and services to the company on credit.

Accrued expenses are liabilities that the company has incurred but has yet to be invoiced for.  

These expenses include sales tax payable, wages payable and accrued rent payable.

Other Liabilities is a slush fund for all short term debts that didn’t qualify to be included in the above categories.

Account payable, accrued expenses and other debts can tell us a lot about the current situation of a business but as stand alone entries they tell us little about the long term economic nature of the business and whether or not it has a durable competitive advantage.

However, the amount of short and long term debt that a company carries can tell a great deal about the long term economics of a business and whether or not it has a durable competitive advantage.


Short Term Debt

This includes commercial paper and short term bank loans.

Short term money is cheaper than long term money.

It is possible to make money borrowing short term and lending it long term. 

We just borrow more money short-term to pay back the short term debt that is coming due (rolling over the debt). 

The problem works well until the short term rates jump above what you lent the money long at. 

You have to refinance your short term debt at a rate in excess of what you loaned it out at.

Another problem of borrowing short term to lend this money long term is when your creditors decide not to loan you any more money short term. 

Suddenly you have to pay back all that money you borrowed short term and lent long term (e.g. Bear Stearns). 

The smartest and safest way to make money in banking is to borrow it long term and lend it long term.

When it comes to investing in financial institutions, you should shy away from companies that are bigger borrowers of short-term money than of long-term money. 

While being aggressive can mean making lots of money over the short term, it has often led to financial disasters over the long term. 

In troubled financial times, it is the stable conservative banks that have the competitive advantage over the aggressive banks that have gotten themselves into trouble.

The durability equates with the stability that comes with being conservative. 

It has money when the others have losses, which creates opportunity.

Aggressive borrowers of short term money are often at the mercy of sudden shifts in the credit markets, which puts their entire operation at risk and equates with a loss of any kind of durability in their business model.


Long Term Debt Coming Due in current year

As a rule, companies with a durable competitive advantage require little or no long-term debt to maintain their business operations and therefore have little or no long term debt ever coming due.

A company that has a lot of long term debt coming due, we probably are not dealing with a company that has a long term competitive advantage.

Buying a company that has a durable competitive advantage going through troubled times due to a one time solvable event, it is best to check how much of the company’s long term debt is due in the years ahead. 

Too much debt coming due in a single year can spook investors, which will give us a lower price to buy in at.

With mediocre company that is experiencing serious problems, too much debt coming due in a current year can lead to cash flow problems and certain bankruptcy.


Total Current Liabilities and the Current Ratio

A current ratio of over one is considered good and anything below one, bad. 

But, as previously discussed, companies with a durable competitive advantage often have current ratios under one.

Current ratio is of great importance in determining the liquidity of a marginal to average business, it is of little use in telling us whether or not a company has a durable competitive advantage.


Long Term Debt

Long term debts are debts that mature anytime out past a year.

The amount of long term debt a company carries on its books tells a lot about the economic nature of the business.

Companies that have a durable competitive advantage often carry little or no long term debt on their balance sheets.

This is because these companies are so profitable that they are self financing when they need to expand the business or make acquisitions, so there is never a need to borrow large sums of money.

Take a look at the long term debt load that the company has been carrying for the last ten years and not just in the current year.

If there have been ten years of operations with little or no long term debt on the company’s balance sheet it is a good bet that the company has some kind of strong competitive advantage working in its favour.

The company should have sufficient yearly net earnings to pay off all of its long term debt within a three or four year earnings period.

Companies that have enough earning power to pay off their long term debt in under three or four years are good candidates in the search for the excellent business with a long term competitive advantage.

These companies are so profitable and carrying little or no debt, they are often the targets of leveraged buyouts. 

This is where the buyer borrows huge amounts of money against the cash flow of the company to finance the purchase.

After the leveraged buyout, the business is then saddled with large amounts of debts.

In cases like these, the company’s bonds are often the better bet, in that the company’s earning power will be focused on paying off the debt and not growing the company.


Deferred Income Tax, Minority Interest and Other Liabilities

Deferred Income Tax is tax that is due but hasn’t been paid.

This figure tells us little about whether or not the company has a durable competitive advantage.

When a company acquires the stock of another, it books the price it paid for the stock as an asset under long term investments.

When it acquires more than 80% of the stock of a company, it can shift the acquired company’s entire balance sheet onto its balance sheet. 

The same applies to the income statement.

The Minority Interest entry represents the value of the acquired company that the acquirer does not own.

This shows up as a liability to balance the equation, since the acquirer booked 100% of the acquired company’s assets and liabilities, even though it owns from 80% to less than 100%.

What does Minority Interests have to do with identifying a company with a durable competitive advantage? 

Not much.

Other Liabilities:  This is a catchall category  that includes such liabilities as judgments against the company, non-current benefits, interest on tax liabilities, unpaid fines and derivative instruments. 

None of these helps us in our search for the durable competitive advantage.


Total Liabilities and the Debt to Shareholders’ Equity Ratio

The debt to shareholders’ equity ratio can be used to help us identify whether or not a business has a durable competitive advantage.

The debt to shareholder’s equity ratio helps us identify whether or not a company is using debt to finance its operations or equity (which includes retained earnings).

The company with a durable competitive advantage will be using its earning power to finance its operations and therefore, in theory, should show a higher level of shareholders’ equity and a lower level of total liabilities.

The company without a competitive advantage will be using debt to finance its operations and therefore should show just the opposite, a lower level of shareholders’ equity and a higher level of total liabilities.

Debt to Shareholders’ Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Shareholders’ Equity

The problem with using the debt to equity ratio as an identifier is that the economics of companies with a durable competitive advantage are so great that they don’t need to maintain any shareholders’ equity. 

Because of their great earning power, they will often spend their built-up equity/retained earnings on buying back their stock, which decreases their equity/retained earnings base. 

That in turn, increases their debt to equity ratio, often to the point that their debt to equity ratio looks like that of a mediocre business – one without a durable competitive advantage. 

It is easy to see the contrast between companies with a durable competitive advantage and those without it when we look at the treasury share-adjusted debt to shareholders’ equity ratio. 

If we add back into the equity the value of all the treasury stock acquired through stock buybacks, then the debt to equity ratio of these companies with durable competitive advantage can be clearly noticed.

With financial institutions like banks, the ratios, on average tend to be much higher than those of their manufacturing cousins.

Banks borrow tremendous amounts of money and then loan it all back out, making money on the spread between what they paid for the money and what they can loan it out for.

This leads to an enormous amount of liabilities which are offset by a tremendous amount of assets.

On average, the big banks have $10 in liabilities for every dollar of shareholders’ equity they keep on their book.  

That is, banks are highly leveraged operations.

The simple rule:  unless we are looking at a financial institution, any time we see an adjusted debt to shareholders’ equity ratio below 0.8 (the lower the better), there is a good chance that the company in question has the coveted durable competitive advantage we are looking for. 

Debt/Equity = Total Liabilities/Equity# , <0 .8="" better.="" lower="" o:p="" the="">


#Treasury share adjusted

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage from the ASSETS OF THE BALANCE SHEET?

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage?

Financial statements are where you can search for companies with a durable competitive advantage that is going to make one super rich.


BALANCE SHEET

The balance sheet is a snapshot of the company's financial condition on the particular date that the balance sheet is generated.

Assets minus Liabilities = Net worth or Shareholders' Equity


Assets

Current Assets:  Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, net receivables, inventory and other assets.

Non Current Assets:  Long Term investments, Property Plant and Equipment, Goodwill, Intangible Assets, Accumulated Amortization, Other Assets and Deferred Long Term Asset Charges.

Individually and collectively, via their quality and quantity, tell a great many things about the economic character of a business and whether or not it possesses the coveted durable competitive advantage that will make an investor super rich.


Current Asset Cycle

Cash --> Inventory -->  Accounts Receivable -->  Cash.

This cycle repeats itself over and over again and it is how a business makes money.


Cash and Cash Equivalent

Companies traditionally keep a hoard of cash to support business operations.

A company basically has three ways of creating a large stockpile of cash.

·         It can sell new bonds or equity to the public, which creates a stockpile of cash before it is put to use.

·         It can also sell an existing business or other assets that the company owns, which can also create a stockpile of cash before the company finds other uses for it.

·         Or it has an ongoing business that generates more cash than the business burns.

Look at the past seven years of balance sheets. 

This will reveal whether the cash hoard was created by a one-time event, such as the sale of new bonds or shares, or the sale of an asset or an existing business, or whether it was created by ongoing business operations.  

If we see lots of debts, we probably are not dealing with an exceptional business.

But if we see a ton of cash piling up and little or no debt and no sales of new shares or assets and we also note a history of consistent earnings, we are probably seeing an excellent business with a durable competitive advantage - the kind of company that will make us rich over the long term.

A company that is suffering a short-term business problem may see its shares sold down in the stock market.   
Look at its cash or marketable securities that the company has hoarded away to gain an idea whether it has the financial strength to weather the troubles it has gotten itself into.

If we see a lot of cash and marketable securities and little or no debt, chances are very good that the business will sail on through the troubled times.  

But if the company is hurting for cash and is sitting on a mountain of debt, it probably is a sinking ship that not even the most skilled manager can save.


Inventory

With a lot of businesses, there is a risk of inventory becoming obsolete.

Manufacturing companies with a durable competitive advantage have an advantage, in that the products they sell never change and therefore never become obsolete.

To identify a manufacturing company with a durable competitive advantage, look for an inventory and net earnings that are on a corresponding rise.

This indicates that the company is finding profitable ways to increase sales and that the increase in sales has called for an increase in inventory, so the company can fulfill orders on time.

Manufacturing companies with inventories that rapidly ramp up for a few years and then, just as rapidly, ramp down are more likely than not companies caught in highly competitive industries subject to booms and busts.  

And no one ever got rich going bust.


Net Receivables

Receivables - Bad Debts = Net Receivables

If a company is consistently showing a lower percentage of Net Receivables to Gross Sales than its competitors, it usually has some kind of competitive advantage working in its favour that the others don't have.


Prepaid Expenses/Other Current Assets

Insurance premiums for the year ahead, which are paid in advance is an example of prepaid expense.

Prepaid expenses offer us little information about the nature of the business or about whether it is benefiting from having a durable competitive advantage.


Total Current Assets and the Current ratio

The higher the current ratio, the more liquid the company is.

A current ratio of over one is considered, good and anything below one, bad.

If it is below one, it is believed that the company may have a hard time meeting its short term obligations to creditors.

A lot of companies with a durable competitive advantage often have current ratios below one.

Their earning power is so strong they can easily cover their current liabilities.

Also, as a result of their tremendous earning power, these companies have no problem tapping into the cheap, short-term commercial paper market if they need any additional short term cash.

Because of their great earning power, they can also pay out generous dividends and make stock repurchases, both of which diminish cash reserves and help pull their current ratios below one.

There are many companies with a durable competitive advantage that have current ratios less than one.

Such companies create an anomaly that renders the current ratio almost useless in helping us identify whether or not a company has a durable competitive advantage.


Property, Plant and Equipment

These are carried at their original cost, less accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation is what occurs as the plant and equipment wear out little by little; every year, a charge is taken against the plant and equipment.

The company that has a durable competitive advantage replaces its plant and equipment as they wear out, while the company that doesn’t have a durable competitive advantage has to replace its plants and equipment to keep pace with the competition.

A company with a durable competitive advantage will be able to finance any new plants and equipment internally. 

But a company that doesn’t have a competitive advantage will be forced to turn to debt to finance its constant need to retool its plants to keep up with the competition. 

Producing a consistent product that doesn’t have to change equates to consistent profits. 

The consistent product means there is no need to spend tons of money upgrading the plant and equipment just to stay competitive which frees up tons of money for other money-making ventures.


Goodwill
The FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) decided that goodwill wouldn’t have to be amortized unless the company that the goodwill was attached to was actually depreciating in value.

Whenever we see an increase in goodwill of a company over a number of years, we can assume that it is because the company is out buying other businesses. 

This can be a good thing if the company is buying businesses that also have a durable competitive advantage.

If the goodwill account stays the same year after year, that is because either the company is paying under book value for a business or the company isn’t making any acquisitions. 

Businesses that benefit from some kind of durable competitive advantage almost never sell for below their book value. 

Occasionally it does happen and when it does, it can be the buying opportunity of a lifetime.


Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are assets we can’t physically touch:  patents, copyrights, trademarks, franchises, brand names and the like.

Companies are not allowed to carry internally developed intangible assets in their balance sheets.

Intangible assets that are acquired from a third party are carried on the balance sheet at their fair value. 

If the asset has a finite life – as a patent does – it is amortized over the course of its useful life with a yearly charge made to the income statement and the balance sheet.

The real value of some companies that benefit from durable competitive advantage may be understated.  

For example, its strong brand name is worth a lot and yet because it is an internally developed brand name, its real value as an intangible asset is not reflected in its balance sheets.

Coke’s brand name is worth a lot. The intangible asset of Coke is its brand that gives it durable competitive advantage and the long term earning power that came with it.

Short of comparing ten years’ worth of income statements, investors have had no way of knowing it was there or knowing of its potential for making them super rich.


Long Term Investments

This records the value of long term investments (longer than a year): stocks, bonds and real estate, investments in the company’s affiliates and subsidiaries.

This asset class is carried on the books at their cost or market price, whichever is lower.  

It cannot be market to a price above cost even if the investments have appreciated in value.

This means that a company can have a very valuable asset that is carrying on its books at a valuation considerably below its market price.

A company’s long-term investments can tell us a lot about the investment mind set of top management.

Do they invest in other businesses that have durable competitive advantages or do they invest in businesses that are in highly competitive markets (mediocre businesses)?

Watch out for management of a wonderful company buying mediocre companies.

Also search for  and love the management of a mediocre company buying companies with durable competitive advantage e.g. Berkshire Hathaway.


Other Long Term Assets

Examples are paid expenses and tax recoveries that are due to be received in the coming years.

These tell us little about whether or not the company in question has a durable competitive advantage.


Total Assets and the Return on Total Assets

Return on total asset ratio is found by dividing net earnings by total assets.

It tells us how efficient the company is in putting its assets to use.

Capital is always a barrier to entry into any industry.

One of the things that helps make a company’s competitive advantage durable is the cost of the assets one needs to get into the game.

The really high returns on assets may indicate vulnerability in the durability of the company’s competitive advantage.

Moody’s (total assets $ 1.7 billion, ROA 43%)
Coca Cola’s (total assets $ 43 billion, ROA 12%)


While Moody’s underlying economics is far superior to Coca Cola’s, the durability of Moody’s competitive advantage is far weaker because of the lower cost of entry into its business.

Friday, 16 September 2016

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage from the INCOME STATEMENT?

How do you identify an exceptional company with a durable competitive advantage?

Financial statements are where you can search for companies with a durable competitive advantage that is going to make one super rich.


INCOME STATEMENT

Gross Profit

Gross Profit is a key number that helps determine whether or not the company has a long term competitive advantage.

Companies that have excellent long term economics working in their favour tend to have consistently higher gross profit margins than those that don't.

What creates a high gross profit margin is the company's durable competitive advantage, which allows it the freedom to price the products and services it sells well in excess of its cost of goods sold.

As a general rule (and there are exceptions):
Companies with gross profit margins of 40% or better tend to be companies with some sort of durable competitive advantage.

Companies with gross profit margins below 40% tend to be companies in highly competitive industries, where competition is hurting overall profit margins (there are exceptions here, too).

Any gross profit margin of 20% and below is usually a good indicator of a fiercely competitive industry, where no one company can create a sustainable competitive advantage over the competition.

The gross profit margin test is not fail-safe, it is one of the early indicators that the company in question has some kind of consistent durable competitive advantage.

You should track the annual gross profit margins for the last ten years to ensure that the consistency is there.


Operating Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative (SGA) expenses

In the search for a company with a durable competitive advantage the lower the company's Sales, General and Administrative (SGA) expenses, the better.

If they can stay consistently low, all the better.

Anything under 30% of Gross Profit is considered fantastic.

However, there are a number of companies with a durable competitive advantage that have SGA expenses  in the 30% to 80%range.

If you see a company that is repetitively showing SGA expenses close to, or in excess of 100%, the company is likely in a highly competitive industry where no one entity has a sustainable competitive advantage.

There are also companies with low to medium SGA expenses that destroy great long term business economics with high research and development costs, capital expenditures and/or interest expense on their debt load.

Steer clear of companies with consistently high SGA expenses.

The economics of companies with low SGA expenses can be destroyed by expensive research and development costs, high capital expenditures, and/or lots of debt because the inherent long-term economics are so poor that even a low asking price for the stock will not save investors from a lifetime of mediocre results.

Research &Development expenses

Companies that have to spend heavily on R&D have an inherent flaw in their competitive advantage that will always put their long term economics at risk, which means they are not a sure thing.


Depreciation

Depreciation is a very real expense and should always be included in any calculation of earnings.  It is a cost that cannot be ignored.

The companies that have a durable competitive advantage tend to have lower depreciation costs as a percentage of gross profit than companies that have to suffer the woes of intense competition.

Less depreciation always means more when it comes to increasing the bottom line.


Interest Expense

Interest expense is a financial cost, not an operating cost and it is isolated out on its own in the income statement because it is not tied to any production or sales process.

Interest is reflective of the total debt that the company is carrying on its books.

Companies with high interest payments relative to operating income (EBIT) tend to be in a fiercely competitive industry, where large capital expenditures are required for it to stay competitive, or a company with excellent business economics that acquired the debt when the company was bought in a leveraged buyout.

The companies with a durable competitive advantage often carry little or no interest expense.

Even in highly competitive businesses like the airline industry, the amount of the operating income paid out in interest can be used to identify companies with a competitive advantage.

Warren's favourite durable competitive advantage holders in the consumer products category all have interest payouts of less than 15% of operating income.

The percentage of interest payments to operating income varies greatly from industry to industry.

The investment banking business, the average interest payments are in the neighbourhood of 70% of its operating income.

The ratio of interest payments to operating income can also be very informative as to the level of economic danger that a company is in.

A simple rule:  In any given industry the company with the lowest ratio of interest payments to operating income is usually the company most likely to have a competitive advantage.

Investing in the company with a durable competitive advantage is the only way to ensure that we are going to to get rich over the long term.

Gain (or Loss) on Sale of Assets and Other

Non-recurring, non-operating, unusual and infrequent income and expense events (e.g. sale of assets) can significantly affect a company's bottom line.

Since these are nonrecurring events, they should be removed from any calculation of the company's net earnings in determining whether or not the company has a durable competitive advantage.


Income before tax (Pretax earnings)

Income before tax is also the number that Warren uses when he is calculating the return that he is getting when he buys a whole business or when he buys a partial interest in a company through the open-market purchase of its shares.

[With the exception of tax-free investments, all investment returns are marketed on a pre-tax basis.  And since all investments compete with each other, it is easier to think about them if they are thought about in equal terms.]

Warren has always discussed the earnings of a company in pre-tax terms.  This enables him to think about a business or investment in term relative to other investments.

It is also one of the cornerstones of his revelation that a company with a durable competitive advantage is actually a kind of "equity bond" with an expanding coupon or interest rate.

Income Tax paid

One of the ways to see if the company is telling the truth is to look at the documents they file and see what it is paying in income tax.  If this doesn't equal the amount according to the tax rate, better start asking some questions.

Companies that are busy misleading the IRS are usually hard at work misleading their shareholders as well.

The beauty of a company with a long-term competitive advantage is that it makes so much money it doesn't have to mislead anyone to look good.


Net Earnings

Net earnings that are consistent and showing a historical long term upward trend can be equated to durability of the competitive advantage.

The ride doesn't have to be smooth but it should be a historical upward trend.

A company's historical net earnings trend may be different from its historical per share earnings trend due to changes in the number of shares outstanding (e.g. share buyback programs will increase per share earnings even though actual net earnings haven't increased.)

Look at the business's net earnings to see what is actually going on.

Companies with a durable competitive advantage will report a higher percentage of net earnings to total revenues than their competitors will.

Net profit margins tell us a lot about the economics of the business compared with other businesses.

High net profit margins reflect the companies' superior underlying business economics.

Low net profit margins reflect the highly competitive nature of the business.

A simple rule (and there are exceptions) is that if a company is showing a net earnings history of more than 20% on total revenues, there is a real good chance that it is benefiting from some kind of long term competitive advantage.

If a company is consistently showing net earnings under 10% on total revenues it is - more likely than not - in a highly competitive business in which no one company holds a durable competitive advantage.

Those companies that earn between 10% to 20% on total revenue may also have companies with long term competitive advantage yet to be discovered.

One of the exceptions to this rule is banks and financial companies, where an abnormally high ratio of net earnings to total revenues usually means a slacking off in the risk management department.    In the game of lending money, this is usually a recipe for making quick money at the cost of long term disaster.


Per-Share Earnings

The more a company earns per share the higher its stock price is.

A per share earnings figure for a ten year period can give us a very clear picture of whether the company has a long term competitive advantage working in its favour.

Look for a per share earning picture over a ten year period that shows consistency and an upward trend - an excellent sign that the company in question has some kind of long term competitive advantage working in its favour.

Consistent earnings are usually a sign that the company is selling a product or mix of products that don't need to go through the expensive process of change.

The upward trend in earnings means that the company's economics are strong enough to allow it either to make the expenditures to increase market share through advertising or expansion, or to use financial engineering like stock buybacks.

Erratic earnings picture that shows a downward trend, punctuated by losses tells that this company is in a fiercely competitive industry prone to booms and busts.

There are thousands of companies like this and the wild price swings in shares, caused by each company's erratic earnings, create the illusion of buying opportunities for traditional value investors.  But what they are really buying is a long, slow boat ride to investor nowhere.



Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Prem Watsa 2011 (Good Video)




Published on 7 Dec 2015
In addition to acting as a guest speaker on February 16, Mr. Prem Watsa, Chairman and CEO, Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. has invited Dr. Athanassakos and a group of his Value Investing MBA and HBA students to attend the Fairfax annual meeting of shareholders on Wednesday, April 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. After the annual meeting, students will have an opportunity to meet Mr. Watsa and his team.

Mr. Watsa is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd., a financial services holding company, which he took over in 1985. The company, through its subsidiaries, is engaged in property and casualty insurance and reinsurance, as well as investment management. Mr. Watsa is a Chartered Financial Analyst, a graduate of the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology with a degree in Chemical Engineering and a holder of an MBA from the Ivey Business School at Western University. He is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Hospital for Sick Children, a member of the Advisory Board for the Ivey Business School and a member of the Board of Directors of the Royal Ontario Museum Foundation, as well as Chairman of the Investment Committee of St. Paul’s Anglican Church.

Fairfax has been one of the few companies to escape the ravages of the great recession of 2008 as Mr. Watsa and his team had anticipated the credit crisis and had taken the necessary steps to protect Fairfax . Mr. Watsa, also known as the Buffett of the North, had discussed his fears about the markets in a key note speech he gave to The Ben Graham Center of Value Investing First Annual Symposium on Value Investing on May 25, 2007. His key note speech can be viewed here.

For more on Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd., see www.fairfax.ca

Sunday, 11 September 2016

Charlie Munger on Thinking errors and Misjudgements (Summary)

Summary:

Do we behave to environmental stimuli like ants?

1.  Reward and Punishment Super-response Tendency 
(Incentive and disincentive-caused bias.  It is imperative to understand the role of incentives and disincentives in changing cognition and behavior. The power of incentives can be used to produce desirable behavioural changes.  An incentive-caused bias can tempt people into immoral behaviour.  If you rip apart any system and look at its core design, you will find mainly two things: incentives and disincentives. Communism has failed due to the absence of exactly those incentives. The US financial crisis was an outcome of wrong incentives and absence of disincentives.   It is quite clear that man responds more often and more easily to incentives than to reason and conscience. )

2.  Liking and Loving Tendency 
(This tendency to love has its own set of side effects.  Don't fall in love with your stocks.  Fall in love and protect your capital.  Be a disciplined value investor!)

3. Doubt-avoidance Tendency
(Quick conclusions and quick decisions are often preferred instead of the burden of doubts and ambiguity.  When neither under pressure nor threatened, a person should ideally not be prompted to remove doubt through rushing to some decision.)

4.  Inconsistency-avoidance Tendency 
(We tend to filter away any piece of information which may be inconsistent with our ideas and beliefs.  Be disciplined with your approach:  play the devil's advocate or have processes and procedures in place that tend to minimize hasty and biased decision making.  Adjourn your stock purchases till you are sure.  Stock markets will always keep swinging higher and lower.  Investing opportunities will be there.)

5.  Envy and Jealousy Tendency  
(Greed is fuelled by envy.  Everyone is here not just to make money, but to make more money than what the next person is making.  Comparison and competition are intense, creating a perfect recipe for jealousy tendency.  The important point to take home is to not let such negative emotions affect your investment decisions. Avoid discussions that would trigger feelings of jealousy.  Keep extremely low profile and keep discussions to stock ideas and business fundamentals.)

6.  Over-optimism tendency  
(Excess of optimism is the normal human condition.  "What a man wishes, that also will he believe."  The best way is to acknowledge that this bias exists in the first place.  Challenge your views by asking yourself as many questions as possible to see if your views can stand the attack of reason.)

7.  Social proof tendency
( It is an automatic tendency to think and act the way people around you are thinking and acting.  The evil of corruption continues to persist because of the Serpico Syndrome, which is created by the social proof tendency and the power of incentives.  It dominates how investors behave in stock markets, how company managements (institutional imperative) do business and so on.  Have the management act as if they were the owners.  Buffett says, "We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.)

8.  Contrast Misreaction Tendency 
(We perceive everything in relative terms.  It influences how we think about economic news and information, corporate performance, stock prices and so on.  Contrast misreaction cause people to make wrong judgements based on misleading contrasts between two or more things and situations.  For example, a person shifting to another city and looking for a new house and his estate agent using this trick on him.  For the investor, why he did not buy the stock at 140 (because it rose from 90) and then he bought the same stock at 300 (because it fell from 450)?  A stock with P/E of 50 in past and is now at P/E of 30 does not mean it is a lucrative buying opportunity.  Look at the company's business fundamentals and its past financial track record.  Valuing the company based on such important parameters will help you avoid false comparisons.)

9.  Availability-misweighing Tendency  
(Due to the relentless flow of news and information, the human mind has a tendency to focus on what's easily available.  In doing so, often tend to give undue importance to it.  In the absence of relevant information, investors often end up giving undue importance to such insignificant matters.  Adopt Charles Darwin's approach.  He would try to gather evidence to disconfirm it.  Challenge the merit of the idea.  Look for potential risks and concerns that could adversely affect the company.  The ultimate investing decision should be based solely on your understanding and insght and not from borrowed optimism.  Be discipline.  To avoid falling prey to this tendency is to prepare an investment check list and adhere to the process in a disciplined manner.)


10.  Use-it-or-lose-it Tendency  
(The importance of regular practice is especially very vital in skills of a very higher order.  Many people take investing as a side business which can be done without putting in too much time and effort.  And that is one of the biggest fallacies.  Legendary investors such as Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger and Peter Lynch did not create great fortunes out of thin air. They are known to be rigorous practitioners of their art.  They all read extensively and spend a huge amount of their daily routine analysing companies.  By using their mental skills meticulously, they have become successful pilots of the investing world.)

11.  Senescence-misinfluence Tendency  
(At an age when you may not be in the best physical frame to travel distances and perform demanding tasks, what could you do for an alternative source of income?  The answer is investing.  The real risk of significant losses lies in speculative short-term trading.  If you choose the path of long term value investing, you will not only live with minimal risk, but the chances of immense profits will be significantly high.  Remember, in the long run, equities tend to outperform all major asset classes.  If you develop useful skills early in your life and practice them rigorously over the years, you could manage to retain those skills for a much longer period, despite the aging process.)

12.  Authority-misinfluence Tendency  
(Uncertainty and risk have a big influence on how independently people take their decisions.  This makes the stock market a place that is incurably afflicted by the authority-misinfluence tendency.  Just spare a moment and ponder about how exactly you decide when to buy or sell a stock.  What makes you follow these experts?  It is important that you exercise your own independent judgement to the opinions of others.  "Mr. Market is there to serve you, not to guide you."  The greatest investors in the world are those who do not give in to the moods of Mr. Market.  (Mr. Market is a parable told and popularised by Benjamin Graham, teacher of Warren Buffett.)


13.  Twaddle Tendency  
(Man often indulges in petty small talks and chatter.  They only become a nuisance when they come in the way of some serious work that is in progress.  This twaddle tendency, like the twaddle dance of the honey bees, can lead to unproductive results.  And this is what we need to keep a check on.   Better to stay in a quiet corner meantime rather than doing something silly, irrelevant or unproductive.)

Saturday, 10 September 2016

Sustainable Growth Rate = Return on Equity X Retention Ratio

Tips, Tricks, & Techniques

SustainableGrowth Rate.

You may forecast an earnings growth rate for the future.

There are a number of guidelines for this forecast.

One is called the Sustainable Growth Rate.

Sustainable growth rate is that rate at which the company can continue to grow, without having to borrow money or without having to issue new common stock.

This rate is a function of both Return on Equity [ROE] and the dividend payout ratio.

ROE is a measure of how well management is using stockholders money to build the company.

It compares the gains in EPS to gains in book value per share.

Dividend payout ratio is that percentage of profits paid out to stockholders. Keep in mind that every dollar paid out in dividends is one dollar less to grow the company with.

Formula: Sustainable Growth Rate = ROE * [1 - dividend payout ratio]


Example:

Company’s ROE is 20%.

Dividend payout ratio is 10%.

What is the Sustainable Growth Rate?

0.20 * [1.0 — 0.10] = 0.20 * 0.90 = 0.18 = 18%

Good guideline to determine forecast EPS: Keep forecast EPS estimate lower than Sustainable Growth Rate.

The ROE value used is the average for the last 5 years where ROE is calculated as the EPS for the given year divided by the prior year’s Book Value per Share.

The rational for calculating ROE in this manner is that this year’s EPS is the result of last year’s Book Value.


Addendum to Sustainable Growth Rate comments by Ellis Traub 

As happens so often, we can get carried away with the formulae and the numbers and lose sight of the concepts.

A company begins the year with $100 million in equity.

And, during the course of that year, it earns $15 million for a return on that equity of 15 percent.

If it retains all of what it earned, the equity will have grown 15 percent.

And, since the company was able to make 15 percent on its equity, those retained earnings should also be able to earn 15 percent in the next year.

Similar to compounding, this shows that the sustainable growth, just the growth produced by those retained earnings, be 15 percent.

Companies aren't restricted from growth above that rate. They use a variety of resources to increase or perpetuate a higher rate.

They include leverage (using other people's money) to acquire the assets that generate more revenue, or they sell more shares.

While those shares might dilute the EPS, they were sold not given away, so they do add to the equity of the company.

Acquiring productive assets, acquiring operating companies, etc. are only a few of the things that managements, or directors, commonly do to exceed the sustainable growth rate.

So, of what interest is it to us?

 It's just a simple metric that tells us that, without doing these other things, the company can still grow at that rate. 

The only thing that might keep the ROE, sustainable growth, and earnings growth from being the same is the prospect of not using all of those earnings to produce more but, instead, to pay out some of those earnings in dividends. 

This, of course, would reduce the amount of money that is available to earn more; and it will, therefore, cut down the sustainable or implied growth rate. 

Otherwise, if dividends are not paid, the ROE and earnings growth rate will be the same, as will Implied growth.

If earnings growth falls, so will the ROE.

This formula (Implied growth = ROE * RR) [RR=Retention ratio, the percent of earnings NOT distributed to shareholders] will not work if you use ending or average equity.



http://naicspace.org/pdf/sustainablegrowthrate.pdf


STOCK FUNDAMENTALS By Ellis Traub USING ROE TO ANALYZE STOCKS: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT
http://www.aaii.com/journal/article/using-roe-to-analyze-stocks-what-you-need-to-know-about