Saturday, 6 December 2025

Stock Market Scams

 

Stock Market Scams

28 March 2012





The pump and dump is one of the oldest and most effective scams. Usually, pump and dumps are used on small stocks selling below $1.00 a share because it is easier for pump-and-dumpers to manipulate the stock price with smaller stocks.

2. Insider Trading
There are actually two types of insider trading: legal and illegal.




Summary

This article outlines two common types of stock market scams that exploit unsuspecting investors:

  1. Pump and Dump
    A fraudulent scheme in which insiders artificially inflate ("pump") the price of a low-value stock—often penny stocks—by spreading false or overly optimistic information through channels like Internet chat rooms or press releases. As outside investors buy in and the price rises, the scammers sell ("dump") their shares at a profit. Once the hype fades and the truth emerges, the stock price collapses, leaving ordinary investors with nearly worthless shares.

  2. Insider Trading
    There are two types:

    • Legal insider trading: When company insiders (employees, executives) trade their company's stock but properly report it to the SEC.

    • Illegal insider trading: When insiders trade based on material non-public information—or when they tip off others who then trade. The article suggests illegal insider trading is widespread, even though the SEC occasionally prosecutes high-profile cases to deter it. The author estimates that many insiders routinely profit from undisclosed company information.

Discussion Points

  • Accessibility of Scams: The Internet has made "pump and dump" schemes easier to execute by allowing fraudsters to reach large audiences quickly.

  • Vulnerability of Investors: Both scams prey on investors' trust and desire for quick gains—especially in the case of penny stocks, which are easier to manipulate.

  • Regulatory Challenges: While illegal, these practices persist. Insider trading, in particular, is described as an "open secret," implying enforcement is inconsistent and many violations go undetected.

  • Investor Responsibility: The article implicitly warns investors to be skeptical of "too good to be true" opportunities and to research before investing, especially in low-priced stocks or tips from unverified sources.

Comment

The article serves as a clear, practical warning for investors, emphasizing that scams are not only prevalent but have evolved with technology. While it rightly highlights the persistence of illegal insider trading, it could further discuss how ordinary investors can protect themselves—such as by verifying information through official SEC filings and avoiding investments based solely on rumors or anonymous online hype. Ultimately, it reinforces the need for both investor education and stronger regulatory oversight to maintain market integrity.

No comments: