Payback Period

Payback Period (PBP) is the period of time required for the cumulative expected cash flows to equalize the initial investment or cash outflow.


1.  Equivalent or constant cash inflow.

PBP = Initial Investment / Cash Inflow


2.  Unequal Cash Inflow

PBP = N + [ (Initial Investment - Accumulated Cash Inflow for Year N)/Cash Flow for Year M ]

N = the number of years for the accumulated cash flows that had not exceeded the capital or investment.

M = the year where the total accumulated cash flow is equal to or more than the capital or investment.

Accounting Rate of Return or Average Rate of Return (ARR)

Accounting Rate of Return or Average Rate of Return (ARR)

• a financial ratio used in capital budgeting
• does not take into account the concept of time value of money
• calculates the return generated from net income of the proposed capital investment.

1.  Investment without scrap value

Depreciation = Total Investment / Useful Life

ARR = [(Average Cash Flow - Depreciation) / Initial Investment] x 100%

2.  Investment with a scrap value

Depreciation = (Total Investment - Scrap Value) / Useful Life

ARR = [(Average Cash Flow - Depreciation) / Initial Investment] x 100%

Project Evaluation

The decisions of where to invest the company's resources have a major impact on the future competitiveness of the company.

Trying to get involved in the right projects is worth an effort, both to

• avoid wasting the company's time and resources in meaningless activities, and 
• to improve the chances of success.

Project evaluation is a process used to determine whether a firm's investments are worth pursuing.

Producing new products, buying a new machine and investing in a new plant are examples of firm's investment.

Investing in those activities involves a major capital expenditure, and management needs to use capital budgeting techniques to determine which projects will yield the most return over an applicable period of time.



Capital Budgeting Factors

Factors involved in capital budgeting are:

1.  Initial Cost
The initial investment or cash capital required to start a project.

2.  Cash In Flow
The estimated cash amount that flows into a business due to operations of the project or business.

3.  Investment Period
The duration of the project and when it is estimated to be completed.

4.  Discount Factor
The value of interest that will be received or charged during the period of the project's execution and it will affect the present value of cash in flows for different years.

5.  Time Value of Money
The idea that a ringgit now is worth more than a ringgit in the future, even after adjusting for inflation, because a ringgit now can earn interest or other appreciation until the time the ringgit  in the future would be received.This theory has its base in the calculation for present value.



Factors influencing investment decision

A firm must make an investment decision to improve or increase the incomes of the company in order to compete in the market.

Investment environments include:

1.  Product development/enhancement
2.  Replacing equipment/machinery
3.  Exploration of new fields or business.



Project Evaluation Methods

Common methods used in evaluating projects, investments or alternatives are:

1.  Payback Period (PBP)
2.  Accounting Rate of Return/Average Rate of Return (ARR)
3.  Net Present Value (NPV)
4.  Profitability Index (PI)
5.  Internal Rate of Return (IRR)


In choosing an investment or project, select the project which generates HIGHER ARR, NPV, PI and IRR; and SHORTER PBP.



APPENDIX:

Turning investing principles into good investing habits

So just what is a habit?

A habit is:

• a recurrent, often unconscious pattern of behaviour that is acquired through frequent repetition, and,
• an established disposition of mind or character.

As an investor,you need to not only learn to do it well but also to do it with some consistency, and do it without struggling to remember what you did last time.  

As a low volatility investor, you are not likely to be as active trading in the markets as some other investors, and you may not watch as closely.

Any investor - active, inactive, aggressive or low volatility - has a duty to keep up with his or her investments.

For the low volatility investor and others, it is important to develop certain habits, routines, or thought processes for:

• choosing investments,
• watching and managing investments, and
• selling or replacing investments.

With the right habits, you will increase the chances of success.

Turning principles into habits

Investors have obvious goals:  to produce wealth and to preserve capital.

Anything an investor does should address both goals, preferably simultaneously.

As an investor, you are motivated to succeed and, over time, you build a set of strategies and tactics to help you achieve those goals.

"Motivation is what gets you started.  Habit is what keeps you going."

It is easy to get motivated.  It is harder to learn the ropes - the skills and techniques - required to become a good investor.  

But what may be hardest of all, once you gain experience and enjoy some investing success, is to turn those skills into habits.

Habits that become built in, second nature, repeatable and predictable, and not only lead to good results but help you avoid bad ones.

Without consistent habits, low volatility investors will make mistakes and find themselves off in the weeds. 

Good investing habits are like a good golf swing: apply those habits to every investment choice and you won't succeed every time, but your chances for success will brighten considerably.

The thought processes in building a portfolio that works.

You want an investment portfolio that meets your financial objectives. 

Investors have obvious goals:  to produce wealth and to preserve capital.

You also want that portfolio to accomplish those goals quietly, with a minimum of upsets, a minimum of nerves, a minimum of complex mathematics, and most likely, a reasonable amount of effort on your part, because you are busy doing other things in life too.

The tiered portfolio is divided into three primary tiers:

1.  The Foundation portfolio
2.  The Rotational portfolio
3.  The Opportunistic portfolio.



The Foundation portfolio (80%)

This is set up to meet or slightly beat expected market returns, often with stable and somewhat defensive investments.

Dividend-paying stocks with rising dividends and growing prospects while at the same time exhibiting low downside risk and volatility are a pretty good fit.

These investments can be stocks or funds, and can be augmented by fixed-income securities, real estate, or other investments that meet this general profile.



Rotational (10%) and Opportunistic (10%) portfolio

The purpose of these is to achieve better-than-market returns, perhaps with more volatility, but these portfolios are small enough to contain risk and to avoid consuming too much of your investing time and bandwidth.



Putting together your portfolio

How your portfolio is put together is entirely up to you, not only because the portfolio needs to suit your tastes, intuitions and the facts at the time, but also because many of the investments (and the mix of investments) may not even be available, or priced right, at the time.

Building a tiered portfolio

This tiered portfolio has three segments:

1.  Foundation investments
2.  Rotational investments
3.  Opportunistic investments.


Foundation investments (80%)

These are like dividend-paying stocks that produce market (or better) returns with relatively less risk.


Rotational investments (10%)

These are mostly ETFs and inverse investments.  They add some defense and sector diversification to your portfolio.


Opportunistic investments (10%)

These employ a little more risk to boost returns.



Aim

The net result should be a portfolio that generates above-market returns with below-market risk.

The most bang for your buck

You want to select investments carefully to eke out those one, two or three extra percentage points of excess return. 

You are trying to add investments that is, at the highest possible return level for the amount of risk taken.  

You are trying actively to manage volatility and risk - avoid, reduce, retain or transfer risk.

Essentially, you want the most bang for your buck.

Smart diversification is the key. The smart investors are focus Investors.

True investors are not random stock pickers.

They take out risk by understanding the investments and their intrinsic value, rather than by spreading the risk across more companies.

Smart investors are focus investors who drive toward deep understanding of their investments without diluting possible returns through diversification.

They see danger in owning too many investments, which may be beyond the scope of what they can manage or keep track of.

Here's the paradox:  Instead of reducing risk through diversification, risk may actually increase as it becomes harder to follow the fortunes of so many businesses.

That is why Buffett and others reject diversification per se as an investment strategy.

They prefer to reduce risk by watching a few companies and investments more closely.


"Diversification is for people who don't know what they're doing."  Warren Buffett.

Volatility, Risk and You as an Investor. "Take no risk" is not an option.

As an investor, you have to know something about volatility and risk, where it comes from and how it can affect your investment performance.

If you avoid volatility altogether, example, keeping your money in fixed deposits or risk free saving deposits, you will eventually be sorry in all but the most remote black swan scenarios.



What are you to do?  

You will have to face the risk and decide how you want to go forward in your investing.  There are at least four things you can do about risk, to manage it.

1.  Avoid risk:  accept risk-free returns of 2% or less.
2.  Retain risk:  know it's there, know its dangers, and deal with them.
3.  Reduce risk:  be smart about what you are doing by taking the necessary precautious
4.  Transfer risk:  make contrarian investments or buy derivatives -another scary concept, to insure your portfolio.



The best investing approach to risk taking

The best investing approach overall is some combination of the four.

Warren Buffett's strategy was primarily to reduce risk by knowing what he was doing.  We can embrace a lot of what he has to say, though we cannot all be so masterful.

We may want to avoid risk with certain portions of our investments, like an emergency or college fund as we approach our children's college years.

We will retain risks, knowing it is hard to quantify or measure just how much risk we want to retain.

We will reduce risks by being smart, which means knowing where the risks come from and taking steps, like doing smart, forward-looking research to reduce them.

There are ways to transfer some of the risks by buying and selling certain types of options to trade a relatively more volatile future for certain cash today or to insure a portfolio outright.




"Take no risk" is not an option.

If you have money, you will take risk.

If you want your money to work for you some day, you have to take a little more risk, especially in view of long-term inflation.

If you embrace and manage the risk properly and stay within yourself, you won't lose sleep at night.  

What is risky is what makes you lose sleep at night.

This is anything that's psychologically upsetting or distracting that causes you not to be wholly focused or effective on the rest of what's gong on around you.




Risk checklist

Here is a short risk checklist:

• If you cannot sleep at night, you are taking too much risk.
• If you cannot function normally without being distracted; if you are irritable or angry or pensive or withdrawn, you are probably taking too much risk.
• If you are risking something greater than you can afford to lose, you are taking too much risk.
• If you are truly worried about your long-term financial security, you are taking too much risk.
• The converse is true too.  If you are truly worried about long term financial security, you may not be taking enough risk; you are sacrificing too much return.

Conclusion

In the end, it all depends on how much risk you want to take and how you feel about risk to achieve a balance you are comfortable with.

Low volatility investing is the acceptance and management of some investing risk to produce better-than-market returns while minimizing exposure to the wealth-destroying sharp downturns that can have long-term effects on investing performance.

Small losses versus Big losses. They are different stories.

Small Losses

Small hits or losses are alright, so long as they aren't persistent or don't last forever.  That said, we cannot take 10% or even 5%, losses ongoing and forever.  Even if we under-perform the markets by a few percentage points, we can lose out on considerable gains once the power of compounding sets in.


Big Losses

Big losses are a different story.  We can tolerate the 10% corrections and even ignore the 10% twitter, but if we are exposing ourselves to 50% losses on individual investments - or worse, on substantial portions of our portfolios - look out!  It will take a lot to turn that ship around and get it back to where it went off course.


Fluctuations, minor corrections and bear market

There is a big difference between fluctuations, minor corrections (considered to be 10% pullbacks by most market professions), and an all-out bear market, usually considered a plunge of 20% or more.  The prudent investor senses the difference between fluctuations, corrections and the more destructive bear markets.


The high cost of an untimely hit.

Volatility can be expensive, especially, if it goes beyond normal investment noise into creating a significant downturn, especially at the beginning of an investing period.

The principles and effects of compounding makes a difference not just how much we succeed but also WHEN we succeed in the markets.

The general principle is that the more we can earn SOONER - to unleash the power of compounding to a greater degree over a longer time - the better off we are.

Conversely, if our investment capital takes a hit in the early going, it takes a lot just to get back to even, let along to get ahead.

Limitations on using the past data approach. The past does not predict the future.

There are two general categories of limitations on using the past data approach:

1.  The past doesn't predict the future.

No matter how much math you apply to how much data, you're still looking backward.

Trying to say what's going to happen based on what has happened is a dangerous game, particularly with anything involving as many non-quantifiable variables as investing.

The best thing you can do with the models is to gain a better understanding of what happened in the past, but you can't be sure it will happen again in much the same way; in fact, you can be pretty sure it won't happen the same way again.

2.  There are too many moving parts.

External, internal and personal factors all come into play, and no model can take everything into account.  

A stock may have played predictably in the past (and a company's earnings may have played predictably, too, thus the stock price predictability), but what happens when something changes?

What happens when customers suddenly decide they don't like a product anymore or, for that matter, when investors decide they don't like a stock (or gold or corn or a bond or real estate) anymore, or as much as they did?

You can't predict all the factors that influence the future.  Nobody can.  Again, if you could, who would take the other side of the trade?

In investing, it is more important to be able to measure and conceptually understand what is going on than doing a lot of complex quantitative analysis..

Investing is not, and never will be, a formula.

There are no equations to determine the best investments.

There are theoretical approximations but we cannot depend on them 100%.

For a host of reasons, they don't tell all, and they don't always work.

The point is to be able to measure and conceptually understand what's going on.

You are probably better off knowing what questions to ask and making big-picture look-out-the-window risk/reward decisions than getting bogged down trying to calculate the risk of the investment yourself.

You can look at the numbers, particularly comparative numbers, to get an idea whether an investment more or less accomplishes your objectives.

You can also look at a chart to get a quick view or vision of the volatility without knowing the precise numbers within.

At the end of the day, quantitative measures are important mostly for comparison.




Summary

Some of your best investment calls will occur by simply looking out the window.

What is important is to grasp the concept and then with a few measures to help assess risk/reward and especially to compare it.

Informed common sense

Remember the past doesn't predict the future.

There are also too many variables you cannot quantify, like human behaviour and economic sentiment.

Some of the investing models are pretty cool but they are far from perfect; and they may sidetrack you from making the right decisions.

INFORMED COMMON SENSE will help you more in making the right decisions.

Housing is a volatile investment indeed, at least for most people.

Statistics show that housing on the whole is a relatively tame investment:

• Average annual percent change:  3.1%
• Number of years positive:  15
• Number of years negative:  5
• Number of years between 0 and 10% positive:  13.
• Number of years more than 20 percent positive: 0
• Number of years more than 20 percent negative: 0

[Housing is thus an example of low volatility investment, with a tame and steady 3.1% annual gain with 15 positive years out of 20 and no 20% annual fluctuations.  Also, you get to live in it.]

Two caveats.  

Caveat number one is:  the price of a house is very large.  So a 5% (or $10,000) move on a $200,000 asset is significant and a 20% (or $40,000) move is gigantic.  Volatility as a percentage should naturally attenuate as the base of an index rises.  Sometimes the opposite happens when bubbles go into correction.

The second caveat is: leverage magnifies volatility.  Suppose you buy a $200,000 house and that you, like most others do, borrowed 80% of the value.  Your equity is $40,000.  A 5% or $10,000 price decrease now translates into a 25% ($10,000/$40,000) change.  [The mathematics:  if your equity is only a fifth of the asset value, you must multiply the volatility figures by 5x.]

Here are the housing volatility figures, this time assuming an 80% mortgage:

• Average annual percent change:  15.5%
• Number of years positive:  15 
• Number of years negative:  5
• Number of years between 0 and 10% positive:  2
• Number of years more than 20% positive:  10
• Number of years more than 20% negative: 2

Note especially the decline in the number of years between 0 and 10 percent positive:  from 13 to 2.  Looked at it in this light, housing is a volatile investment indeed, at least for most people.

[Remember too the impact of leverage on volatility.  This comes into play, too, when looking at companies to invest in.  If they've borrowed a lot of to finance the business, that, too, can lead to higher volatility.]

Volatility and Leverage: A vicious circle?

Where leverage is involved, a small loss is magnified into a big one.

That bigger loss creates considerable indigestion for the losers.

They see what's happening and rush to deleverage; that is, to sell assets to reduce exposure to volatility.

That rush to the exits creates more volatility.

The cycle continues.

This deleveraging cycle goes a long way to explain the 2008 financial crisis:  the volatility that created it and that it created.

When we look at the causes and consequences of volatility, we can see how it frequently can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, particularly where leverage is involved.

What went wrong for Turkey? Its economy is 'in the midst of a perfect storm'

What went wrong for Turkey? Its economy is 'in the midst of a perfect storm'


August 13, 2018 16:17 pm +08


(Aug 13): The free fall in the Turkish lira has stoked fears of an economic fallout that could spill over into other emerging markets and the banking systems in Europe.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan blamed the plunge in the currency on "an operation against Turkey" and dismissed suggestions that the country's economy was facing troubles. But strategists from J.P. Morgan Asset Management said the NATO member has found itself "in the midst of a perfect storm" of worsening financial conditions, shaky investor sentiment, inadequate management of the economy and tariff threats from the U.S.

"Turkish assets have been under severe pressure," the strategists wrote in a Friday note. "While Turkey makes up a small percentage of the global economy and financial markets, investors are worried about the issues in Turkey causing damage in other markets around the world, particularly Europe."

In the immediate term, policy decisions out of Washington have sparked Turkey's currency crash: The lira plunged as much as 20 percent against the dollar on Friday after President Donald Trump said he approved doubling metals tariffs on Ankara. But the cracks in Turkey's economic foundation were already spreading before the American president made his move.

How did Turkey get here?

Turkey has in recent years been one of the fastest-growing economies in the world, even outperforming economic giants China and India last year. In the second quarter of 2018, the country reported 7.22 percent growth in its gross domestic product.

That expansion, however, was fueled by foreign-currency debt, analysts said. At a time when central banks around the world were pumping money to stimulate their economies after the global financial crisis, Turkish banks and companies were racking up debt denominated in U.S. dollars, they said.

That borrowing, which fueled consumption and spending, resulted in Turkey running deficits in both its fiscal and current accounts. The former happens when government spending exceeds revenue, while the latter essentially means a country buys more goods and services than it sells.

The country's foreign currency debt now stands at more than 50 percent of its GDP, according to estimates by the International Monetary Fund.

Implications of Turkey's debt

Turkey is not the only economy with "twin" deficits and high amounts of foreign currency debt. Indonesia, for example, also runs fiscal and current account deficits and its foreign currency borrowing is roughly 30 percent of GDP.

But unlike Indonesia, Turkey doesn't have large enough reserves to rescue the economy when things go wrong, said Richard Briggs, an analyst from research firm CreditSights.

According to Briggs, Turkey's reserves are notably low compared to its $181 billion in short-term debt denominated in currencies other than the lira. On top of that, much of the foreign currency in Turkey is held by banks, and those funds could be withdrawn by customers, he added.

That means when the lira falls, Turkey may not be able to buy up its currency to prevent it from spiraling further. If that situation worsens, the country would have to find other ways to finance its debt, including possibly getting bailed out by the International Monetary Fund.

Economic mismanagement

To many analysts, Turkey wouldn't have gotten into the current predicament if its central bank had been left to do its job.

The Turkish economy has been "overheating" with inflation — at 16 percent in July — way exceeding the central bank's target of 5 percent. Raising interest rates could have helped to stem such a massive increase in consumer prices: Higher rates tend to attract foreign investors, who would need the lira to buy Turkish assets. That could in turn support the currency, which makes imports cheaper and lessens the burden of paying back foreign debt.

But Erdogan has said he's in favor of lower interest rates to continue driving growth. His influence over the country's central bank has undermined investor confidence, experts have said.

"President Erdogan continues to prioritize growth and lower rates which will extend the current crisis, rather than allowing the economy to rebalance. He is here to stay, and markets don't have confidence in him. That's a dangerous mix," Briggs wrote.

What's next for Turkey?

Without raising interest rates, Turkey has few other options to get out of its economic problems, said Eric Robertsen, global head for foreign exchange, rates and credit research at Standard Chartered Bank.

Turkey earlier said it was limiting banks' foreign exchange swap transactions but it wasn't implementing capital controls. Those measures are merely "baby steps" and won't do much unless interest rates are raised, Robertsen told CNBC's "Squawk Box."

"The interest rates policy is kind of the critical line of defense," he said. "What they have to do is make sure that currency doesn't leave the country in a full-fledged capital flight ... it has to be a combination of currency measures and interest rates, there's no way around that."


http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/what-went-wrong-turkey-its-economy-midst-perfect-storm

A Horrifying Storm Is Brewing Inside the Stock Market

A Horrifying Storm Is Brewing Inside the Stock Market

The markets continue to hover around record highs. But there could be a storm brewing investors need to watch.

MoneyShow.com
Aug 8, 2018


Don't forget risk.

Leverage remains insanely high at $647 billion, 55% higher than at the 2007 double housing and stock bubble peak and 116% higher than the 2000 tech mania peak. Total margin debt has exceeded 3% of Gross Domestic Product only three times; in 1929 as the madness of the Roaring Twenties peaked, last year and this year.

Leverage may seem like magic on the way up but the effects are horrifying when prices fall. The unwinding of margin debt between 1929-1932 resulted in a economic depression as the phenomenal wealth driving the nation's economy evaporated.

Stock prices fell as much as 90% after soaring 4.2-fold in only nine years and four months. The damage was so extensive that the Dow Industrials did not fully recover until 26 years later in 1955.

Thus, we look at today's stock market and worry about the similarities. In only nine years and four months from the previous bear market bottom in March 2009, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has now surged 4.1-fold, almost exactly the same as the run into the 1929 peak.

While we do not expect an exact repeat of the 1929-32 period when excessive leverage led to a crash and a collapse into an economic depression, the current environment is way too similar to past manias and in certain aspects — primarily leverage — is far worse than the prior two peaks in March 2000 and October 2007. Given our long term target of Dow 14,719, down 43% from today, we have zero comfort for the long side.

Meanwhile, total dollar trading volume (DTV) now stands at yet another new record high. Over the last 12 months, total DTV is now $81.24 trillion, up nearly 15% from last years record, roughly 75% higher than at the 2007 double bubble peak and 150% higher than at the tech mania peak.

The trend to trade more has kept average holding periods for U.S. stocks to just over four months. When stocks are held for the long term, valuation becomes a primary consideration. The shorter period one holds stocks, the less likely one is to rely on valuations, hence valuation methodologies are now routinely shunned and scorned in favor of chasing momentum.

Sentiment is perhaps the most significant driver of price, but it is not mere excessive optimism that makes the current environment so dangerous. Excessive valuations have been in place for so long that they are now accepted as entirely normal.

In the same way that buying stocks for 10% down in 1929 was regarded as normal, in the same way the "Nifty Fifty" one decision stocks in 1972 were considered normal, in the same way Nasdaq at a 250 P/E multiple in 2000 was considered normal, today's environment is accepted as normal and forecasts of higher prices abound.

In a CNBC survey of 19 top Wall Street firms, every strategist forecast higher prices and an average gain of another 10.6% through the remainder of the year. We are far more comfortable on the other side of the fence. Risks on the long side continue to be insanely high.

History has shown 30% downturns occur on average, roughly once every nine years. We are astonished how little attention is paid to risk parameters, even at this point when it is so ridiculously obvious how much leverage is built into stock prices and how overvalued stocks are.

We expect as bear market and our target remains Dow 14,719. Be careful. A storm is brewing.

By: Alan Newman, editor of CrossCurrents. Via MoneyShow.



https://finance.yahoo.com/m/79fb3e52-7b6f-3489-a678-e0731fb8b644/a-horrifying-storm-is-brewing.html

A massive losing bet on bitcoin futures has investors buzzing

A massive losing bet on bitcoin futures has investors buzzing
CRYPTOCURRENCY
Friday, 3 Aug 2018


HONG KONG: A huge wrong-way bet on Bitcoin has left an unidentified futures trader unable to cover their losses, putting counterparties at risk and threatening to dent confidence in one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency venues.

The more than US$400mil long position in Bitcoin futures was amassed on OKEx, a Hong Kong-based exchange that’s ranked No. 4 on Coinmarketcap.com’s list of the biggest crypto platforms, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because he isn’t authorized to speak about the issue with the media.

While OKEx has moved to liquidate the position, it has so far been unable to cover the trader’s shortfall amid a down market for Bitcoin this week, the person said.

If the shortfall still exists at the 4 pm settlement time in Hong Kong on Friday and exceeds the size of the exchange’s insurance fund, futures traders who have unrealized profits on OKEx may be forced to absorb the losses, in line with a “clawback” policy detailed on OKEx’s website, the person said. OKEx doesn’t expect the issue to affect the exchange’s ability to function, he said.

“Everyone is talking about it,” said Jake Smith, a Tokyo-based adviser to Bitcoin.com, in reference to the OKEx trade. Smith said the systemic risks were likely contained, but that the episode could have some ripple effects on the market. “The main question is how will OKEx handle this,” he said.

Lennix Lai, a director at OKEx, said via email that the exchange may issue a statement on Friday. Lai didn’t answer an emailed list of questions from Bloomberg News.

In a statement on its website last month, OKEx outlined planned changes to its margin rules and liquidation procedures that it said would “vastly minimize the size of bankruptcy positions” and make clawbacks less frequent. The exchange, which allows clients to leverage their positions by as much as 20 times, said it would start rolling out the changes in September. Before clients can begin trading futures, they’re required to pass a quiz on OKEx’s rules.

Clawbacks are unique to crypto markets and expose the exchanges who use them to reputational risks when clients are forced to absorb losses, said Tiantian Kullander, a former Morgan Stanley trader who co-founded crypto trading firm Amber AI Group. “It’s a weird mechanism,” Kullander said.

Bitcoin, the biggest cryptocurrency by market value, dropped 3.2% to US$7,309 at 3:20 pm Hong Kong time on Friday, extending its decline this week to 11%. It has slumped 49% this year. - Bloomberg


Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/08/03/a-massive-losing-bet-on-bitcoin-futures-has-investors-buzzing/#Uu1VCrlVplSB1SwH.99

F&N shares rise on higher profit

F&N shares rise on higher profit

Friday, 3 Aug 2018


KUALA LUMPUR: Shares in Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) rose on Friday boosted by a 51% profit increase in the third quarter ended June 30.

The counter rose 16 sen, or 0.43% to RM37.56. In the past one year, F&N shares have appreciated 54.09%.

F&N’s third quarter net profit jumped 51% to RM104.5mil, from RM69.37mil a year earlier, thanks to positive contributions from Malaysia and Thailand.

Revenue, however, was slightly lower by 1% to RM1.03bil, from RM1.04bil in 3QFY17.

Kenanga Research said F&N’s 9M18 core net profit of RM318.8mil (-6%) and the absence of dividend was within expectations.

“New products are seen as key drivers for the group, amidst slow spending trends and high production costs.

“The high cost, however, could be mitigated by the group’s improving efficiency following capital investments and restructuring,” it said.

Kenanga has maintained its underperform and target price of RM32.15 on F&N.


Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/08/03/fn-shares-rise-on-higher-profit/#faIuSFbJd1Z3daQP.99

Caring Pharmacy Group

Caring profit sends shares up 9%

Wednesday, 25 Jul 2018


KUALA LUMPUR: Caring Pharmacy Group is the top performer on Bursa Malaysia with shares up 9% in early trade after it posted a higher profit.

The counter rose 15 sen, or 9.09% to RM1.80, its highest since late-January.

Caring Pharmacy’s net profit for the fourth quarter ended May 31 rose 34.6% to RM5.86mil from RM4.36mil recorded a year ago.

Revenue for the quarter rose 8.2% to RM129.35mil from RM119.5mil, driven by the higher sales generated from existing outlets due to aggressive and extensive promotional campaign launched during the quarter under review.

For the full financial year ended May 31,Caring’s net profit soared 41.4% to RM18.56mil on revenue of RM508.27mil.

Read more at https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/07/25/caring-profit-sends-shares-up-9pc/#FwfoAcyie8QWFqw7.99