Wednesday, 4 March 2020

Very good discussion on Refinancing mortgage


[–]sunnymeek 11 points  
With their age and lack of income, I'd be looking at selling and downsizing to a smaller place that they can afford. Possibly in a cheaper neighborhood. With their equity they can buy a much cheaper place outright and be in a much better position going forward.
[–]soobak4u[S] 1 point  
I am paying the mortgage on their behalf at the moment. I'm on the deed and eventually I'll take over the mortgage as well.
[–]Gravity-Rides 3 points  
Honestly, if the house is worth ~900k as is and livable, I probably wouldn't cash out equity to finance home improvements. It sounds like you would be better off getting a lower rate and taking advantage of improved cash flow, though that comes with fees and resetting the term. If the current mortgage is variable rate, that is bad news and I would probably try to get a fixed rate regardless.
With the improved cash flow, just use that money saved every month to finance any improvements the property needs.
[–]soobak4u[S] 1 point  
The cash flow is the biggest draw but oh man having to go through it another 30 years hurts.
In terms of cash out vs not, it's only a 100 dollar difference per month. Is it not worth it then?
Thanks!
[–]Gravity-Rides 1 point  
IDK. What do their incomes / budgets and retirements look like? On the surface, sure, it's only an extra $100 per month. But it is an extra $39k that will need to be paid back with interest. It might make sense if the plan is to sell the house and downsize in a few years / months if they can recover that cost.
[–]sunnymeek 1 point  
You should definitely be looking to refinance. 4-4.25 seems high from what others have been saying they can get, so shop around some more.
As far as the best loan to do, it really depends. How old are you parents? Are they still working? Will they be able to make payments for 20-30 more years, or are you taking this over? How much can you afford?
If it's in really bad shape, 35k probably won't really fix it. But maybe having an extra $1500 a month can start making a dent in the maintenance.
[–]soobak4u[S] 1 point  
Hi thanks for the response. I did edit my post to mention why the rates are what it is but it's because my parents have no money and a not so excellent credit score.
They're going to hit their 60s and yes I'd take over in a few years. The kitchen and bathrooms are the biggest issues. They're workable but definitely need repairs. I wasn't thinking of a total overhaul but just to fix it so it'll be good for another 5-10 years hopefully?
Thanks!
[–]FlyingPhotog 1 point  
Just locked in a refi on a $465,000 balance at 3.625% with almost all the costs covered by lender credits.




Warren Buffett Explains Why Book Value Is No Longer Relevant



The Oracle of Omaha on why cash flows are more important than book value
March 03, 2020


For decades, value investors have used book value per share as a tool to assess a stock's value potential.

This approach began with Benjamin Graham. Widely considered to be the father of value investing, Graham taught his students that any stocks trading below book value were attractive investments because the companies offered a wide margin of safety and low level of risk. To this day, many value investors rely on book value as a shortcut for calculating value.



Buffett on book value

Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) is perhaps Graham's best-known student. For years, Buffett used book value, among other measures, to asses a business's net worth. He also used book value growth as a yardstick for calculating Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) value creation.

However, as far back as 2000, the Oracle of Omaha started to move away from book value. He explained why at the 2000 annual meeting of Berkshire shareholders. Responding to a shareholder who asked him for his thoughts on using book value to track changes in intrinsic value, Buffett replied:

"The very best businesses, the really wonderful businesses, require no book value. They — and we are — we want to buy businesses, really, that will deliver more and more cash and not need to retain cash, which is what builds up book value over time...

In our case, when we started with Berkshire, intrinsic value was below book value. Our company was not worth book value in early 1965. You could not have sold the assets for that price that they were carried on the books, you could not have — no one could make a calculation, in terms of future cash flows that would indicate that those assets were worth their carrying value. Now it is true that our businesses are worth a great deal more than book value. And that's occurred gradually over time. So obviously, there are a number of years when our intrinsic value grew greater than our book value to get where we are today...

Whether it's The Washington Post or Coca-Cola or Gillette. It's a factor we ignore. We do look at what a company is able to earn on invested assets and what it can earn on incremental invested assets. But the book value, we do not give a thought to."

It is no secret that value as an investing style has underperformed growth over the past decade. There's no obvious explanation as to why this is the case, but one of the explanations could be that the definition of value is out of date. Buffett's comments from the 2000 annual meeting seem to support this conclusion.



No longer a good measure

Book value was an excellent proxy for value when companies relied on large asset bases to produce profits. As the economy has shifted away from asset-intensive businesses and more towards knowledge-intensive companies, book value has become less and less relevant.

What's more, as Buffett explained in 2000, book value does not necessarily represent intrinsic value. Just because a stock is trading below its book value does not necessarily mean it is worth said book value.

The same is true of companies trading at a premium to book. The intrinsic value of that business could be significantly higher than book value as book value does not tend to reflect intangible assets.

Investing is an art, not a science, and valuing businesses is not a straightforward process. Investors cannot rely on a simple metric or shortcut to assess value. Many factors contribute to intrinsic value and intrinsic value growth, and using book value as a proxy for intrinsic value is an outdated method. Even in Graham's time, it wasn't always correct.


https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1063604/warren-buffett-explains-why-book-value-is-no-longer-relevant


Learning From Peter Lynch: How to Survive a Market Correction

In the 1988 Barron's Roundtable, the guru gave some invaluable advice to investors
March 02, 2020

Peter Lynch’s track record at Fidelity Magellan shot him to fame, and to this day, many investors look up to him for advice on equity market investing. Over three decades, he has given many invaluable insights into markets and how they work.

Throughout his tenure at Fidelity, Lynch emphasized the importance of keeping the decision-making process simple. In his book "One Up On Wall Street," the guru revealed that he stumbled upon most of his best investment ideas at the mall when he was least expecting to shop for stocks.

As easy as this investment philosophy might sound, replicating Lynch’s performance can prove to be an impossible task. While there are many stock-picking lessons to learn from him, it seems especially appropriate in the current market correction to analyze how he survived significant market downturns during the period he led the fund, and the techniques he used to do so.



The 1987 market crash

On Oct. 22, 1987, the Dow fell by 508 points, or 23%. This day is now commonly known as Black Monday. This correction is the largest one-day drop in history and needless to say, there was fear and panic among both retail and institutional investors at that time. Peter Lynch was invited to the Barron’s Roundtable in 1988 while the market was still reeling from the massive losses the prior year. Some of the answers he gave the panelists are very relevant today and might help investors approach investing the right way.


Focus on company fundamentals, not on macroeconomic developments

When it comes to investing, it’s important to realize that there are a few variables that are out of the control of an investor. Global macroeconomic developments fall into this category, but investors spend both time and money on trying to be better forecasters of the next recession or the prospects for securing a better trade deal with the United Kingdom.

In 1998, Peter Lynch told Barron’s panelists:

“There’s always something to worry about. But it’s garbage to worry about these things. Philip Morris’s earnings went up about six-fold. in the last 10 years; the stock went up about six-fold. Merck’s earnings are up five-fold in the last 10 years; the stock is up four-fold. I don’t own any of these stocks; I can brag about them.”

He also listed a few stocks, including Avon Products, whose share price had declined drastically following a period of lower-than-expected earnings.

According to Lynch, the real focus of an investor should be on picking winning companies. Company fundamentals will rule over any other external factors in determining the value of an equity security in the long term. Understanding this important relationship could help generate alpha returns.

Today, the travel sector is getting hammered in the market as there’s a widespread fear of reduced travel and leisure activities on a global scale. This is true, but it’s very likely that leading companies in this sector, including Carnival Corporation (NYSE:CCL), will deliver stellar returns in the future. Carnival has very strong competitive advantages over its peers, including an economic moat, which will help it generate solid financial performance in the future, even though 2020 will be tough.

This applies to airline stocks as well. The falling stock prices do not reflect the economic reality that the demand for their services will pick up in the next decade along with the increasing disposable income in many countries across the world. According to Reuters data, business-related travel will also grow exponentially in the next five years, which is another driver of growth for the industry. Contrarian investors might want to research beaten stocks, which is the right decision according to Lynch.

A recession is coming, but there’s nothing to worry about

There’s no doubt that the U.S. economy will eventually reach a peak and report negative growth. This is called the business cycle effect, and there’s no outsmarting this. For centuries, the global economy has behaved this exact same way.



Source: Intelligent Economist

When Lynch was asked whether America was headed toward a recession in 1988, he said:

“Sure, but why should we worry about it? We had the worst recession since the Depression in 1982-’83. We had 14% unemployment, 15% inflation, and a 20% prime rate. But I never got a phone call a year before, saying we were going to have that. The stock market has a 100% record, in the last 50 years, of predicting upturns in the economy. It’s never been wrong. It’s less than 50-50 on a downturn. There will be a recession. But whether it’s going to in ’88 or ’89, I don’t know. Might be ’94. This theory that we have to have a recession every now and then — I’ve looked in the Constitution, stayed up late and read the Bill of Rights, and nowhere is it written that every fifth year we have a recession. People say, “Oh, it’s now so many months, plus a full moon, plus the election, and the Olympics, and therefore we have to have a recession.” It’s so crazy! You can have a good economy for three, four, five years”

He couldn’t have been any clearer about how fruitless it is to worry about the next crash. Nobody has ever been able to do this with any degree of certainty. However, it’s a given that markets will reward companies that are doing well. Whenever economic growth has been positive, broad markets have performed well, which is more than enough reason to trust that this will happen the next time as well. Things looked very gloomy in 2008, when fear was dictating investors’ decision-making processes. What followed was a decade-long bull run that is still intact.

Today, there’s no certainty of when the next recession is going to occur, or whether markets can continue to deliver acceptable returns in the next year. But, it’s a given that the U.S. economy will recover from a downturn regardless of how hard the fall is. With that in mind, investors should follow Lynch and continue their search for attractive investment opportunities.



Winning is almost certain in the long term when the strategy is correct

Many legendary investors, including Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio), have stressed the importance of thinking about the long term and not paying close attention to short term market fluctuations. When asked about the right way to approach markets, Lynch said:

“First, if you’re going to need money within 12 months to pay for a wedding or put a down payment on a house, the stock market is not the place to be. You can flip a coin over where the market is headed over the next year. I have no idea whether the next 1,000 points for the Dow or Nasdaq will be in positive or negative territory. But if you’re in the market for the long haul – 5, 10, or 20 years – then time is on your side and you should stick to your long-term investment plan. I would argue that the next 10,000 and 20,000 points for the market will be up. That’s been the long-term trend. The bottom line is to have a responsible plan for your investments and know what you own and why you own it. There’s too much at stake not to.”

This is invaluable advice for investors. The media, analysts and economists are talking about the impact of the new coronavirus and are in a never-ending race to predict how many points the Dow will drop before staging a comeback. This, however, will most likely end up being a futile task. Not a single analyst even remotely predicted that a virus would break out in the first half of 2020 and that economic growth would be challenged as a result. There was simply no way to do this, and the same is true for attempting to decipher the true economic impact of COVID-19. However, a few years down the line, it will be proven once again that corporate earnings have dictated the performance of markets, not the virus in and of itself.



Takeaway

The one thing that is in the control of an investor is his or her decision-making process. If there’s any liquidity, the best course of action is to invest such funds in the market. Selling when markets crash is not a wise thing to do, as empirical evidence suggests.

Peter Lynch emerged victorious in 1988 because he did not dispose of any of his holdings in 1987, even though markets crashed. Rather, he bought stocks, which went against the grain. Today, the markets are at a tipping point, and investors need to act as boldly as Lynch did to keep any hopes of generating positive returns in 2020.


https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1061797/learning-from-peter-lynch-how-to-survive-a-market-correction

About the author:

Dilantha De Silva
I am an investment professional with 5-years of experience in financial markets. I specialize in U.S. equities and incorporate a top-down approach to identify developing macro-level trends and the companies that would benefit from such trends. I am a strong believer that the best investment opportunities could be found in under-covered equities.

I currently work with leading financial publications including Refinitiv, Seeking Alpha, ValueWalk, GuruFocus, and TradeGrill to produce investment-related content.

I'm a CFA level 2 candidate and an Associate Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment (CISI, UK). During my free time, I enjoy reading.

Warren Buffett 2019 Letter: Don't Fret About Market Declines

Some takeaways from the value investor's latest letter to shareholders
February 28, 2020


Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s 2019 letter to investors of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) couldn't have been published at a better time.



The week after the letter was published, markets around the world started plunging. They haven't stopped since.

Luckily, Buffett's letter contained some nuggets of information to help investors keep a cool head in the current turbulent environment.

Buffett's advice for long term-investors

No matter what your opinion of the Oracle of Omaha, you cannot deny that he has a vast amount of experience when it comes to investing. He has been buying and selling stocks and businesses since he was a teenager. That means he has around seven-and-a-half decades of experience in the market.

He has seen it all during this time: market crashes, bubbles, scams, the most prominent corporate failures of all time, conflicts, terrorist attacks, virus outbreaks and everything in between.

As such, Buffett has experience dealing with every market environment. His experience alone means that his advice is worth reading.

Here's what Buffett said in his annual letter when commenting on Berkshire's top equity holdings:

"Charlie and I do not view the $248 billion detailed above as a collection of stock market wagers – dalliances to be terminated because of downgrades by "the Street," an earnings "miss," expected Federal Reserve actions, possible political developments, forecasts by economists or whatever else might be the subject du jour. What we see in our holdings, rather, is an assembly of companies that we partly own and that, on a weighted basis, are earning more than 20% on the net tangible equity capital required to run their businesses."

In other words, Buffett views his investments not as gambling chips in a casino, but as an ownership stake in high-quality businesses.

He went on to state that he and Charlie Munger "have no idea what rates will average over the next year, or ten or thirty years," but that they're confident that stocks will outperform bonds going forward, especially those companies that earn a high return on capital.

Buffett also warned his readers about the unpredictability of the stock market:

"Anything can happen to stock prices tomorrow. Occasionally, there will be major drops in the market, perhaps of 50% magnitude or even greater. But the combination of The American Tailwind, about which I wrote last year, and the compounding wonders described by Mr. Smith [Edgar Lawrence Smith], will make equities the much better long-term choice for the individual who does not use borrowed money and who can control his or her emotions."

Don't worry

These few paragraphs from Buffett give us great insights into his investing mentality. Whenever he looks at a stock, he views it as a business. He's only looking to own high-quality companies with definite competitive advantages, which will help them produce high-double digit returns on invested capital over the long-run.

Buffett's not worried about what happens in the market in the short term. He's also not interested in trying to predict macro developments. His experience has taught him that, over the long run, high-quality businesses outperform, no matter what the macro environment.

We should keep this view in mind in the current market correction. Panicking and selling could be a big mistake. The global economy might suffer if the Covid-19 outbreak becomes a global pandemic, but in five or ten years, this set-back will seem like a distant memory. Companies that suffer a setback will have recovered, and the market's best businesses will undoubtedly be in a better position than they are today.

It is at times like these when it is essential to remember that investing is a marathon, not a sprint.


https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1057672/warren-buffett-2019-letter-dont-fret-about-market-declines


About the author:

Rupert Hargreaves
Rupert is a committed value investor and regularly writes and invests following the principles set out by Benjamin Graham. He is the editor and co-owner of Hidden Value Stocks, a quarterly investment newsletter aimed at institutional investors.

Rupert holds qualifications from the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment and the CFA Society of the UK. He covers everything value investing for ValueWalk and other sites on a freelance basis.

The 10-year Treasury note yield just broke below 1%.

The 10-year Treasury note yield TMUBMUSD10Y, -1.71% tumbled 12.4 basis points to 0.967%, carving out a record intraday low of 0.914% in Tuesday trading, according to Tradeweb data.


The direction of the benchmark maturity’s yield is important for economists, households and central bankers as it serves as a benchmark for all kinds of loans including long-term mortgages. The long-dated bond also serves as a broader barometer of how easy it is to borrow money, and an indication of how investors perceive the U.S. economy’s prospects.




Analysts say the Fed’s move to ease monetary policy ahead of its scheduled policy meeting in two weeks suggests the central bank wanted to demonstrate its willingness to act, in line with research by Fed officials suggesting that early and aggressive rate cuts are more effective when interest rates are near zero.


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-10-year-treasury-note-yield-just-broke-below-1-heres-how-it-happened-2020-03-03


The U.S. bond-market’s benchmark yield plunged below 1% on Tuesday, a possibility that few analysts and investors contemplated at the beginning of the year.
Investors have attributed the slide in U.S. Treasury yields to a combination of factors including 
  • slower global economic growth, 
  • the attraction of a positive return when negative-yielding debt is the alternative in Europe and Japan abroad, and 
  • the absence of any inflation threat.

But in the end, the spark for the furious rally in Treasurys on Tuesday came from a less abstract source: 
  • a surprise 50 basis point interest rate cut from the Federal Reserve to counteract worries that the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic would deliver a painful blow to consumer and market confidence.

Here’s the real reason Warren Buffett is sitting on a record $128 billion in cash, according to one strategist


Published: Mar 2, 2020 1:31 p.m. ET

Warren Buffett, ever the beacon of market optimism, appears to be positively bullish about where stocks are headed from here.

The Berkshire Hathaway BRK.A, -3.26% boss made that clear in his annual letter to shareholders in which he wrote of the “American Tailwind” and made the case for staying invested in stocks.

“If something close to current rates should prevail over the coming decades and if corporate tax rates also remain near the low level businesses now enjoy, it is almost certain that equities will over time perform far better than long-term, fixed-rate debt instruments,” Buffett said in the letter.

But this chart of Buffett’s record cash pile, courtesy of RIA Advisors strategist Lance Roberts, seems to tell a different story — one in which what Buffett is saying looks a whole lot different from what Buffett is actually doing:




“As the old saying goes: ‘Follow the money,’” Roberts wrote in a post on his Real Investment Advice blog. “If he thinks stocks will outperform bonds why is holding $128 billion in short-term bonds?”

While the obvious take is that Buffett is just waiting for a good deal to come along so he can snap it up, another is that he’s not as optimistic as he lets on. Maybe, as Roberts suggests, the answer actually lies in a pair of charts.


This one takes a look at the Shiller price-to-earnings ratio, which is currently around 30x, to project 10-year total returns using history as a guide:



As you can see, a lot of red ink has spilled in the years following valuations like the one we’re currently seeing in the stock market.

Here’s another way to look at it, using the “Buffett Indicator”:




Just look at what happened the last few times Buffett’s favorite valuation measure was elevated. Again, forward return expectations, as several indicators clearly show, are markedly lower over the following 10 years.

Roberts says investors might want to exercise some caution before they follow Buffett’s “do as I say, not as I do” advice and buy and hold index funds.

“Buffett did not amass his fortune by following the herd but by leading it,” Roberts wrote. “He is sitting on a $128 billion in cash for a reason. Buffett is fully aware of the gains he has forgone, yet still continues his ways. Buffet is not dumb!”

Sitting on cash, for the first time in awhile, was not the place to be in Monday’s session as the Dow DJIA, -2.94% , S&P SPX, -2.81% and Nasdaq COMP, -2.99% were all staging strong rebounds.


https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-the-real-reason-warren-buffett-is-sitting-on-a-record-128-billion-in-cash-according-to-one-strategist-2020-03-02?fbclid=IwAR1WhwQ03BmZ49y4Uw1qDww03MApd5mz4anVVLCYOG35X7vdHcL-nduryls

Tuesday, 3 March 2020

How a 27-year-old millionaire in the Seattle area spends his money

27-year-old millionaire who saves 80% of his income refuses to spend on 2 things

Mar 2 2020
Kathleen Elkins
@KATHLEEN_ELK



Todd Baldwin’s net worth crossed $1 million when he was 25.

Today, at 27, he brings in $615,000 annually ($305,000 after business expenses) thanks to a mix of


  • income from rental properties, 
  • his day job working in commercial insurance sales and 
  • the extra cash he makes as a secret shopper.


The majority of his revenue comes from the six rental properties that he owns with his wife, Angela: They earn $460,000 per year in rent. After expenses, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and utilities, they keep about $150,000 of that per year.

“Although our net worth is seven figures, we don’t do a lot of the typical things that most people envision millionaires doing. We are super frugal,” says Baldwin, who wears a $12 rubber wedding band and shares a 2009 Ford Focus with his wife. Because he keeps his expenses so low, he’s able to save more than 80% of his take-home pay.


The millennial millionaire refuses to spend money on a couple of things, he tells CNBC Make It: For starters, he won’t pay for entertainment, like restaurants and the movies, “but only because I know how to get paid for that.”

Baldwin is a “secret shopper” and gets paid for dining out, going grocery shopping, seeing movies and even visiting hotels and casinos.

“There are a lot of businesses out there that want to know how their employees are doing and how the market is responding to their products,” he explains. “So those companies will hire mystery shopping firms to find independent contractors like me to go pose at their establishment as a regular customer, buy the product or service and then report on it.”

He’s made about $30,000 since he started mystery shopping years ago in college. The surveys he fills out after the experience aren’t too time consuming, and for that reason, he has a hard time justifying spending money at bars and restaurants. “If a buddy wants to go to a bar or someone wants to go see a movie, I usually try to wait until I can get a mystery shop,” he says, “because if you’re going to go there anyway, you might as well get it for free and get paid on the top.”

Thanks to secret shopping, he and his wife spend just about $25 a month on food.



“Another thing that I’ll never spend money on is unnecessary bank account fees or credit card fees,” says Baldwin. That’s not to say he doesn’t use credit cards — he has 13 of them — but he never racks up a balance and makes payments on time to avoid late fees.

Baldwin, who was raised by a single mom and started working when he was 12, gets a thrill out of saving. “It’s actually really fun being able to buy something and then choosing not to,” he says.

He thinks through all of his purchases, especially the big ones: “My wife and I want to start a family in the next couple of years, and I was thinking we might get an SUV. I was looking at ones that were about $60,000.” After running the numbers, though, they decided to redirect that money elsewhere. “We took the 60 grand and bought another rental property — and now that property cash flow is $4,000 per month.”

Eventually, the rental income “could pay for four of those SUVs that I liked,” he adds.

The only time Baldwin likes to splurge is if it’s something for his wife — if he’s allowed to, that is. “My wife is more frugal than I am!” he says. “A couple years ago, I bought her a designer purse for like 500 bucks. But when I surprised her with it, she immediately took it back, exchanged it for a $60 purse at Macy’s and then we invested the difference.”

“So we don’t normally splurge.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/01/millennial-millionaire-shares-what-he-refuses-to-spend-money-on.html

Thursday, 13 February 2020

John Maynard Keynes - Courage is the Key to Investing

From 1922 through 1946, Keynes’ stock portfolio outperformed the U.K. stock market by an average of nearly six percentage points annuallyover a period covering the worst market crash, the worst economic depression and the worst war in modern history.


Keynes didn’t look like a great investor all the time. 

As a value investor, focused on buying stocks at bargain prices, he got left behind in the torrid bull market of the 1920s. Keynes didn’t see the Great Depression coming; he went into the Crash of 1929 with roughly 90% of the college’s funds in stocks even though, at the time, most other endowments overwhelmingly preferred bonds.

By late 1929 Keynes had cumulatively underperformed the British stock market by 40 percentage points over the preceding five years.

But he was already turning his performance around.


How Keynes mustered the courage to invest heavily in U.S. stocks devastated by the crash and the ensuing depression.

Keynes had almost entirely ignored U.S. stocks in the college’s endowment until September 1930. What a time to get interested!

The U.S. stock market had fallen 38.4% over the preceding 12 months. But Keynes was so excited by the bargains he saw opening up in the U.S. that he worked with a small New York brokerage, Case Pomeroy & Co., to research the market and his own stock ideas.

In 1931, when U.S. stocks fell a bloodcurdling 47.1%, and again in 1934, when they dropped another 5.9%, Keynes traveled to the U.S., spending much of his time meeting people on Wall Street, in government and in business who could help him research his investment ideas.


He bought U.S. stocks throughout the depression. 

When they fell another 38.6% in 1937, Keynes, undaunted, bought still more.

By 1939, he had put half his main portfolio for the college in U.S. companies, favoring
  • high-dividend-paying preferred stocks, 
  • investment trusts (diversified stock portfolios similar to today’s mutual funds) and, later on, 
  • public utilities. 
He focused on a small number of stocks trading at low multiples of their value as businesses, often hanging on for eight years or more until their stock prices finally rose to reflect those asset values.


Buy when blood was running in the streets

Keynes’  words still ring with the resolve it must have taken to buy when blood was running in the streets:

“The spectacle of modern investment markets has sometimes moved me towards the conclusion that to make the purchase of an investment permanent and indissoluble, like marriage, except by reason of death or other grave cause, might be a useful remedy for our contemporary evils. For this would force the investor to direct his mind to the long-term prospects and to those only.”



Bear markets are unpredictable, reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible

Keynes understood, as did his contemporary, the American value investor Benjamin Graham, that bear markets are so unpredictable that reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible — and that the pain of losing money is nearly unbearable.


Buying into bear markets is the way to prevail

Still, Keynes knew, barging into bear markets to buy, rather than trying to sidestep them, is the way to prevail. Since, over the long run, stocks tend to go up more than they go down, one of the greatest advantages an investor can have is the gumption to buy stocks aggressively in falling markets.


That requires both cash and courage.

With stocks still not far from their record highs today, sitting on some cash is a better idea than ever.

And — unless you’re in or near retirement, in which case you should probably be scaling back on stocks already — steel your courage. Write a binding contract with yourself, witnessed by a friend or family member, committing you to buy more stocks when they fall 25%, 50% or more. Years from now, you’ll be glad you did.



Source: The Wall Street Journal

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/10/14/john-maynard-keynes-courage-is-the-key-to-investing/

Friday, 17 January 2020

Independent Thinking


"You are neither right or wrong
because the crowd disagrees with
you. You are right because your
data and reasoning are right."
-Benjamin Graham


"The most difficult thing in business
is first getting yourself to thinking and
then getting others to thinking."
-Harvey Firestone


"Apply logic to help avoid fooling
yourself. Charlie will not accept
anything I say just because I say it,
although most of the world will."
-Warren Buffett


"Never fool yourself, and remember
that you are the easiest person to fool."
- Richard P. Feynman

Warren and Charlie on "Moats"

Buffett: "So we think in terms of that moat and the ability to keep its width and its impossibility of being crossed as the primary criterion of a great business. And we tell our managers we want the moat widened every year. That doesn't necessarily mean the profit will be more this year than it was last year because it won't be sometimes. However, if the moat is widened every year, the business will do very well. When we see a moat that's tenuous in any way - it's just too risky. We don't know how to evaluate that. And, therefore, we leave it alone.  We think that all of our businesses - or virtually all of our businesses - have pretty darned good moats. And we think the managers are widening them.
Charlie?"

Munger:  "How could you say it better?"
Buffen:  "Sure. Have some peanut brittle on that one."


- From the 2000 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting

Philip Fisherr, author of Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits

Philip Fisher (1907-2004), author of Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, among many other books, began his investment career in 1931.

Like Ben Graham, he achieved impressive results over his lifetime, but Fisher did it with a markedly different approach.

Unlike Graham, who typically invested in statistically cheap "cigar-butts" (with the notable exception of GEICO), Fisher preferred to buy and hold the stocks of high-quality companies that could, "grow and grow and grow."

Thursday, 16 January 2020

Evaluating Investment Results of Your Money Manager

The decision to employ an investment professional should only be made after a thorough analysis of the past investment performance of the individual or organization under consideration.

Some questions are obvious:

  • How long a track record is there? 
  • Was it achieved over one or more market and economic cycles? 
  • Was it achieved by the same person who will manage your money, and does it represent the complete results of this manager's entire investment career or only the results achieved during some favorable period? (Everyone, of course, will be able to extract some period of good performance even from a lengthy record of mediocrity.) 
  • Did this manager invest conservatively in down markets, or did clients lose money? 
  • Were the results fairly steady over time, or were they volatile? 
  • Was the record the result of one or two spectacular successes or of numerous moderate winners? 
  • If this manager's record turns mediocre after one or two spectacular successes are excluded, is there a sound reason to expect more home runs in the future? 
  • Is this manager still following the same strategy that was employed to achieve his or her past successes? 


Obviously a manager who has achieved dismal long-term results is not someone to hire to manage your money. Nevertheless, you would not necessarily hire the best-performing manager for a recent period either

  • Returns must always be examined in the context of risk. 
  • Consider asking whether the I manager was fully invested at all times or even more than 100 percent invested through the use of borrowed money. (Leverage is neither necessary nor appropriate for most investors.) 
  • Contrariwise, if the manager achieved good results despite having held substantial amounts of cash and cash equivalents, this could indicate a low-risk approach. 
  • Were the investments in the underlying portfolio themselves particularly risky, such as the shares of highly leveraged companies? 
  • Conversely, did the manager reduce portfolio risk through diversification or hedging or by investing in senior securities? 


When you get right down to it, it is simple to compare managers by their investment returns.  It is far more difficult - impossible except in retrospect - to evaluate the risks that managers incurred to achieve their results.

Investment returns for a brief period are, of course, affected by luck. The laws of probability tell us that almost anyone can achieve phenomenal success over any given measurement period. It is the task of those evaluating a money manager to ascertain how much of their past success is due to luck and how much to skill. 

Many investors mistakenly choose their money managers the same way they pick horses at the race track. They see who has performed well lately and bet on them. It is helpful to recognize that there are cycles of investment fashion; different investment approaches go into and out of favor, coincident with recent fluctuations in the results obtained by practitioners. If a manager with a good long-term record has a poor recent one, he or she may be specializing in an area that is temporarily out of favor. If so, the returns achieved could regress to their long-term mean as the cycle turns over time; several poor years could certainly be followed by several strong ones.

Finally, one of the most important matters for an investor to consider is personal compatibility with a manager.

  • If personal rapport with a financial professional is lacking, the relationship will not last. 
  • Similarly, if there is not a level of comfort with the particular investment approach, the choice of manager is a poor one. 
  • A conservative investor may not feel comfortable with a professional short-seller no matter how favorable the results; by contrast, an aggressive investor may not be compatible with a manager who buys securities and holds them. 

Once a money manager has been hired, clients must monitor his or her behavior and results on an ongoing basis. The issues that were addressed in hiring a manager are the same ones to consider after you have hired one.

Evaluating Discretionary Stockbrokers and Money Managers

Some stockbrokers function as money managers, having discretionary investment authority over some or all of their clients' funds. Practices such as these may entail serious conflicts of interest since compensation is made on the basis of trading commissions rather than investment results. Nevertheless, you would select a discretionary stockbroker just as you would choose a money manager. The questions to be asked are virtually identical. In both cases, while there are large pools of people from whom to choose, selecting someone to handle your money with prudence and fiduciary responsibility is never easy. 

The ultimate challenge in selecting a stockbroker or money manager is

  • understanding precisely what they do, 
  • evaluating the validity of their investment approaches (do they make sense?) and 
  • their integrity (do they do what is promised, and is it in your best interest?). 




How do you begin to evaluate stockbrokers and money managers? 

There are several important areas of inquiry, and one or more personal interviews are absolutely essential.

There is no better place to begin one's investigation than with personal ethics.

  • Do they "eat home cooking"- managing their own money in parallel with their clients'? 
  • I can think of no more important test of the integrity of a manager and the likelihood of investment success than his or her own confidence in the approach pursued on behalf of clients. 
  • It is interesting to note that few, if any, junk-bond managers invested their own money in junk bonds. In other words, they ate out. 


Another area of inquiry concerns the fair treatment of clients.

  • Are all clients treated equally? If not, why not, and in what ways? 
  • Are transactions performed for all clients contemporaneously? If not, what method is used to ensure fairness? 


A third area of interest concerns the likelihood of achieving good investment results.

  • Specifically, does the broker or money manager oversee a reasonably sized portfolio, or have the assets under management grown exceedingly large
  • One way to judge is to examine the manager's track record since the assets under his or her control reached approximately the current level. Investors can also examine the records of other managers to determine in general how increased size affects performance. 
  • From experience, large increases in assets under management adversely affect returns. The precise amount that can be managed successfully depends on the specific investment strategy employed as well as the skills of the manager under consideration. 


A fourth area of inquiry concerns the investment philosophy of the manager.

  • Does the broker or money manager have an intelligent strategy that is likely to result in long-term investment success? (Obviously, a value-investment strategy would be optimal.) 
  • Does he or she worry about absolute returns, about what can go wrong, or is he or she caught up in the relative-performance game? 
  • Are arbitrary constraints and silly rules, such as remaining fully invested at all times, absent?

Mutual Funds

Mutual funds are, in theory, an attractive alternative for the individual investor, combining

  • professional management, 
  • low transaction costs, 
  • immediate liquidity, and 
  • reasonable diversification. 
In practice, they mostly do a mediocre job of managing money. There are, however, a few exceptions to this rule. 

For one thing, investors should certainly prefer no-load over load funds; the latter charge a sizable up-front fee, which is used to pay commissions to salespeople. Unlike closed-end funds, which have a fixed number of shares that fluctuate in price according to supply and demand, open-end funds issue new shares and redeem shares in response to investor interest. The share price of open-end funds is always equal to net asset value, which is based on the current market prices of the underlying holdings. Because of the redemption feature that ensures both liquidity and the ability to realize current net asset value, open-end funds are generally more attractive for investors than closed-end funds.' 

Unfortunately for their shareholders, because open-end mutual funds attract and lose assets in accordance with recent results, many fund managers are participants in the short-term relative-performance derby. Like other institutional investors, mutual fund organizations profit from management fees charged as a percentage of the assets under management; their fees are not based directly on results. Consequently, the fear of asset outflows resulting from poor relative performance generates considerable pressure to go along with the investment crowd. 

Another problem is that open-end mutual funds have in recent years attracted (and even encouraged) "hot" money from speculators looking to earn quick profits without the risk or bother of direct stock ownership. Many highly specialized mutual funds (e.g., biotechnology, environmental, Third World) have been established in order to exploit investors' interests in the latest market fad. Mutual-fund-marketing organizations have gone out of their way to encourage and even incite investor enthusiasm, setting up retail mutual fund stores, providing hourly fund pricing, and authorizing switching among their funds by telephone. They do not discourage the mutual fund newsletters and switching services that have sprouted up to accommodate the "needs" of hot-money investors.

Some open-end mutual funds do have a long-term value investment orientation. These funds have a large base of loyal, long-term-oriented shareholders, which reduces the risk of substantial redemptions that could precipitate the forced liquidation of undervalued positions into a depressed market. The Mutual Series Funds and the Sequoia Fund, Inc., are among some favorites; the Sequoia Fund, Inc., has been completely closed to new investors in recent years, while some of the Mutual Series Funds periodically open to accommodate new investors.

Investment Alternatives for the Individual Investor



The unfortunate fact is that the individual investor has few, if any, attractive investment alternatives.

Investing, it should be clear by now, is a full-time job. 

Given the vast amount of information available for review and analysis and the complexity of the investment task, a part-time or sporadic effort by an individual investor has little chance of achieving long-term success. 

It is not necessary, or even desirable, to be a professional investor, but a significant, ongoing commitment of time is a prerequisite. 

Individuals who cannot devote substantial time to their own investment activities have three alternatives:

  • mutual funds, 
  • discretionary stockbrokers, or 
  • money managers. 

Good Portfolio Management and Trading are of maximum value when used with an Appropriate Investment Philosophy

Here are a number of issues that investors should consider in managing their portfolios.

While individual personalities and goals can influence one's trading and portfolio management techniques to some degree, sound buying and selling strategies, appropriate diversification, and prudent hedging are of importance to all investors.

Of course, good portfolio management and trading are of no use when pursuing an inappropriate investment philosophy; they are of maximum value when employed in conjunction with a value investment approach.