Friday, 21 November 2025

United Plantation (2089) is an great plantation company. Everyone knows that.

Based on the financial data and the teachings of Warren Buffett, United Plantations Berhad is not just a good company, but it exhibits many of the characteristics of a great company.

Let's analyze it using the Buffett's framework of "Great, Good, and Gruesome" companies.

The "Gruesome" Company

A "gruesome" company is one that:

  • Has low and inconsistent profit margins.

  • Earns a poor return on equity (ROE).

  • Requires constant heavy capital investment to stay afloat (low free cash flow).

  • Operates in a highly competitive industry with no moat, leading to poor pricing power.

Verdict for United Plantations: NOT Gruesome. The data is the complete opposite of this description.

The "Good" Company

A "good" company is one that is often mistaken for a great one. It's characterized by:

  • Rapid Growth in a "Hot" Industry: The stock is often popular and in the news.

  • High Price: Because it's popular, it typically sells at a very high Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio.

  • Volatile Performance: Its success is often tied to the overall industry cycle. In the commodity sector, a "good" company does well when prices are high but struggles when they fall.

Verdict for United Plantations: More than just "Good". While it is in a commodity (palm oil) industry, which is cyclical, its financial performance shows a resilience and quality that transcends a typical cyclical "good" company.

The "Great" Company

This is the type of company Buffett seeks. It has a durable competitive advantage or a wide "economic moat." Key characteristics include:

  • Consistently High Profit Margins: The company has pricing power and cost control.

  • Consistently High Return on Equity (ROE): The company generates high profits without needing to constantly reinvest massive amounts of capital. It can fund growth from its own earnings.

  • Strong Free Cash Flow: The business is a cash machine.

  • Understandable Business: It operates a simple, predictable business model.

  • Long-Term Outlook: Management retains earnings to reinvest at high rates of return, compounding value for shareholders.


Analysis: Why United Plantations is a Great Company

Based on the TTM data we calculated, United Plantations scores exceptionally well on the key metrics for a "great" company:

1. Consistently High and Expanding Profit Margins:

  • Its TTM Net Profit Margin has not only been high but has expanded from around 27% in 2014 to over 35% recently.

  • This is a classic sign of a durable competitive advantage. It means the company can command premium prices for its products, control its costs superbly, or both. In a commodity business, this is rare and indicates extreme operational efficiency and a possible focus on higher-margin products like specialty fats.

2. Extraordinarily High Return on Equity (ROE):

  • As we calculated, the ROE (using TTM EPS / NTA) is phenomenally high, often exceeding 200-250% in recent years.

  • While our specific calculation is influenced by the low carrying value of its assets (land), it unequivocally shows that the company is generating enormous profits relative to its accounting book value. This is the definition of a high-ROE business that Buffett cherishes. It can compound shareholder value at a very high rate.

3. Strong and Growing Earnings (The Cash Machine):

  • The CAGR for TTM Net Profit was 9.19% over 11.5 years, outperforming its revenue growth. This shows the earnings power is not just growing, but becoming more efficient.

  • The company has a long history of profitability through various cycles, demonstrating resilience.

4. Durable Competitive Advantage (The Moat):

  • Efficiency Moat: In a commodity business, the low-cost producer wins. United Plantations' ability to maintain and expand its profit margins while others struggle is a clear sign of a massive efficiency moat. They can produce palm oil more cheaply and effectively than competitors.

  • Reputation & Quality Moat: Their consistent performance suggests a focus on quality and reliability that builds long-term customer relationships.

The One Caveat (The "Good" Company Trap)

The only factor that prevents it from being a perfect, no-doubt-about-it "great" company like See's Candies is its industry.

  • It is still a commodity company. Its fortunes are somewhat tied to the global price of crude palm oil (CPO). While its margins show it handles downturns better than most, a severe and prolonged crash in CPO prices would still impact its earnings.

However, its performance within that cyclical industry is what makes it great. It's not just a fair-weather company; it's an exceptionally well-run business that has built a wide moat through operational excellence.

Conclusion

United Plantations is a Great Company.

It possesses the key financial hallmarks Buffett looks for: high and expanding profit margins, an enormous return on equity, and a demonstrated ability to grow earnings consistently over the long term. It has a clear and durable competitive advantage as a low-cost, highly efficient producer in its industry.

While an investor must always be mindful of the commodity price cycle, United Plantations has proven itself to be among the highest quality operators in the sector, worthy of the "great" designation.



======

Analysis and Interpretation

The CAGRs reveal a very strong and high-quality financial performance from United Plantations over the 11.5-year period:

  1. Profitability Growth Outpacing Revenue: The company achieved a Net Profit CAGR of 9.19%, which is significantly higher than its Revenue CAGR of 6.22%. This indicates an impressive expansion in profit margins over the long term. The company has become more efficient at converting revenue into actual profit, likely through cost control, operational efficiencies, or a more favorable product mix.

  2. Consistent Tax Rate: The fact that the PBT (Profit Before Tax) and Net Profit CAGRs are identical (9.19%) suggests that the company's effective tax rate has remained very consistent throughout this period, which adds predictability to its earnings.

  3. Overall Performance: A near-double-digit annualized growth rate in earnings over more than a decade is a hallmark of a well-managed and fundamentally strong company, especially in a commodity-based industry like plantations.

Key Observations:

  1. Exceptional Profitability: The TTM Net Profit Margins are exceptionally high, consistently staying above 24% for most of the last decade and recently reaching an impressive 36%. This is a hallmark of a highly efficient and profitable company.

  2. Margin Expansion: There is a clear trend of margin expansion over the long term. Comparing the earlier periods (e.g., ~27-30% Net Profit Margin around 2014-2015) to the recent quarters (consistently above 35%) shows significant operational improvement and pricing power.

  3. Extremely High ROE: The Return on Equity (ROE) figures are extraordinarily high. It is crucial to understand the reason:

    • The formula used (EPS/NTA) gives a Price-to-Book ratio equivalent, not a standard ROE. A standard ROE is Net Profit / Shareholders' Equity.

    • The calculated values (e.g., 273%) are possible but indicate that the company is generating profits many times its book value. This often happens when the market value (or the economic value) of its assets (like plantation land) is far higher than the historical cost recorded as NTA on the balance sheet.

    • The massive jump in ROE from 2020 onwards coincides with the capital change (share split) that significantly reduced the adjusted NTA per share, amplifying this ratio. This confirms that the company's assets are carried at a cost that is much lower than their true earning potential.

In summary, these metrics paint a picture of a company with world-class profitability and phenomenal returns on its accounting equity, driven by highly valuable assets and superb operational execution.


Dividend Payout Ratio (Based on Q4 TTM EPS)



Key Observations and Interpretation:

The DPO ratio tells a very clear story about United Plantations' dividend policy and financial performance over two distinct periods.

1. The High Payout Era (2015-2019):

  • During this period, the DPO ratio was consistently over 125%, even reaching nearly 200% in 2019.

  • A DPO over 100% means the company was paying out more in dividends than it earned in net profit for that year. This is often unsustainable for most companies.

  • Interpretation: This indicates that United Plantations was using its strong cash reserves (retained earnings from previous years) to fund dividends. This is a classic sign of a mature, cash-rich company with limited major reinvestment opportunities, choosing to return excess capital directly to shareholders. It signals a very shareholder-friendly management.

2. The Sustainable Payout Era (2020-Present):

  • Starting in 2020, there is a dramatic and consistent shift. The DPO ratio normalized to a band between 77% and 89%, with the exception of 2023.

  • A DPO in the 70-90% range is still very high but is generally sustainable as long as earnings are stable. It indicates the company is paying out most of its annual earnings as dividends.

  • Interpretation: This shift likely coincides with the capital restructuring (share split). The company may have decided to re-base its dividend policy to a high but more sustainable level linked directly to current-year earnings, rather than drawing down on past reserves.

  • The 2023 Anomaly: The 111.4% DPO in 2023 shows that the company was willing to pay a special "bonus" after an exceptionally profitable year (as seen in our TTM analysis), slightly exceeding that year's earnings.

Overall Conclusion:

United Plantations has transitioned from a policy of returning large, excess capital reserves to a policy of sustaining a very high, earnings-based payout. The current ~80% payout ratio is a clear commitment to shareholders, demonstrating that the company prioritizes returning profits while still retaining a portion for reinvestment and stability. This is the mark of a highly profitable company with a generous and thoughtful dividend policy.


Chart of 21.11.2025














In the long run, the stock market is a weighing machine.

It is better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price. (Warren Buffett)




Is Jaya Tiasa (4383), a great, good or gruesome company?

Applying Warren Buffett's core principles provides a very clear lens through which to judge Jaya Tiasa. Let's break it down based on his famous criteria.

The Verdict: This is a Good Company, not a Great one, and it is certainly not Gruesome.

It has moments of brilliance (like FY2025's full-year results) but possesses fundamental characteristics that prevent it from achieving "great" status in the Buffett sense.


Analysis Against Buffett's Core Principles

1. Business Model & Economic Moat: Poor to Fair

  • Buffett's Question: "Is this a simple, understandable business with a durable competitive advantage (moat)?"

  • Jaya Tiasa's Reality:

    • Simple Business? Yes. Growing palm trees and timber, then selling the produce. Easy to understand.

    • Durable Competitive Advantage (Moat)? Very Weak. This is the critical flaw.

      • It is a commodity producer. Its products (CPO, logs) are identical to its competitors'. It cannot charge a premium price.

      • Its "moat" is based solely on cost leadership. The most efficient low-cost producer survives best. While Jaya Tiasa can be efficient, it does not have a clear, unassailable cost advantage over giants like Sime Darby Plantation or IOI Corporation.

      • Its profitability is 100% tied to the volatile global price of CPO, a price over which it has zero control. This is the antithesis of a company with pricing power.

2. Management & Capital Allocation: Fair to Good

  • Buffett's Question: "Is management rational, candid, and shareholder-oriented?"

  • Jaya Tiasa's Reality:

    • Rational & Candid: The financial reports are detailed. Their explanations for the Q4 loss (lower FFB production, fair value losses) are candid.

    • Shareholder-Oriented:

      • Pro: They have significantly reduced debt (now virtually debt-free), which is a very rational and conservative move. They have a strong and growing dividend, directly returning cash to owners.

      • Con (Questionable): The RM100 million land acquisition for property development is a strategic diversification. A skeptic (like Buffett) might ask: "Do they have a core competency in property development, or is this a distraction from their main business?" This move lacks the focus Buffett admires.

3. Financials & Profitability: Volatile (Cyclical)

  • Buffett's Question: "Does the company have consistent earning power, high margins, and high returns on equity with little debt?"

  • Jaya Tiasa's Reality:

    • Consistent Earning Power? No. The history shows wild swings from massive losses (FY2019-20) to record profits (FY2025). Buffett loves predictability; this is the opposite.

    • High Margins & ROE? Inconsistent. The TTM PBT Margin and ROE look good in the up-cycle (21%, 11%) but can turn deeply negative in a down-cycle. This is not the consistent, high-return business Buffett seeks.

    • Little Debt? Excellent. This is a major strength. The company is now conservatively financed, which will help it survive the inevitable next downturn.

4. The "Cigar Butt" vs. "Wonderful Company" Test

This is the most important distinction.

  • Cigar Butt: A mediocre company that is so cheap you can buy it for less than its net current assets and get one "free puff" of profit. It's a bargain, not a long-term hold.

  • Wonderful Company: A fantastic business with a wide moat, bought at a fair price, that you intend to hold forever.

Jaya Tiasa is a "Cigar Butt," not a "Wonderful Company."

  • Its P/B ratio of ~0.89 means you are buying RM1.68 of net assets for about RM1.50. You are getting its plantations, timber, and cash at a slight discount.

  • It is not the type of business you can "buy and hold forever" with confidence because its future profits in 10 or 20 years are entirely dependent on a commodity price you cannot predict.


Final Categorization

  • Gruesome Company: No. A gruesome company has a weak balance sheet, terrible management, and is in a dying industry. Jaya Tiasa has a rock-solid balance sheet, reasonably good management, and is in an essential industry (food and biomass). It is not gruesome.

  • Good Company: YES. This is the correct classification. It is a decently managed, cyclical commodity business that is currently well-run and financially robust. It can be a very good investment at the right point in the cycle (when CPO prices are low and the stock is deeply undervalued). It provides a good dividend and has tangible asset backing.

  • Great Company: NO. A great company, by Buffett's definition, has a wide and durable moat (Coca-Cola's brand, Apple's ecosystem, See's Candies' pricing power), consistent and growing earnings, and high returns on capital through all economic cycles. Jaya Tiasa has none of these. Its fate is tied to a volatile commodity price.

Conclusion: For an investor seeking a cyclical, asset-backed play on the palm oil sector with a good dividend and a strong balance sheet, Jaya Tiasa is a GOOD company and a potentially good investment. For an investor seeking a "wonderful business" to buy and hold for decades through thick and thin, as Warren Buffett prefers, it is not the right type of company.

Thursday, 20 November 2025

The five lessons helped an amateur investor turn $180 into $7 million. Who knows where they might lead you?

  •  41% of the S&P 500's total return from 1926-2006 came from reinvested dividends. Without dividends, $10,000 grew to $1 million. With dividends reinvested, it grew to $24 million.

  • The Lesson: When you invest in dividend-paying stocks, always opt for DRIP (Dividend Reinvestment Plans). Treat dividends not as income to spend, but as employees that go out to recruit more workers (shares) for your wealth-building army.

Compounding is not a linear process; it's exponential. The most dramatic gains occur in the later years.


Be like Grace

5 Lessons From an Unlikely Millionaire

By Selena Maranjian 

April 8, 2010 

Lake Forest College administrators knew their school would receive most of Grace Groner's estate when she passed on, but they probably didn't expect much. Groner, who died in January at the age of 100, lived in a small one-bedroom house. She'd been a secretary once, but retired long ago.

So the college must have been surprised to receive a whopping $7 million from Groner's estate. How did this modest woman amass such wealth?

1. Buy stocks

Groner's wealth began with $180, which she invested in three shares of her then-employer, Abbott Labs (NYSE: ABT).  

Stocks are tied to brick-and-mortar-and-flesh companies -- real businesses that can grow robustly for years to come. That's why companies such as IBM (NYSE: IBM) and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) outperformed the market for so long. When companies increase their profit margins, revenue, and market share over time, their stock prices will likely rise as well.

Over the long haul, stocks have outperformed other investments by leaps and bounds. Check out what just $1 invested in various ways between 1802 and 2006 would have grown to:

Investment Real Return, in 204 Years

Dollar $0.06

Gold $1.95

T-bills $301

Bonds $1,083

Stocks $755,163

Data: Jeremy Siegel, Stocks for the Long Run.

2. Respect your circle of competence

It's not just enough to buy stocks, of course -- you've got to buy the right stocks. Every year, public companies go bankrupt, and the money invested in them vanishes.

Restricting yourself to companies you understand will go a long way toward protecting your investments. Ms. Groner may or may not have understood pharmaceutical science, but she knew the company she worked for.

That applies to hobbies as well as professions. If you're an inveterate shopper, you'll have a sense of whether Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) and Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) are doing well, and you'll likely be able to learn their business models. If you read computer magazines for fun, you probably have a decent handle on the prospects of computer-related companies.

That said, familiarity alone doesn't make a company a good buy. If it isn't turning a profit, can't pay down its debt, or simply demands too lofty a price for its shares, you're better off looking elsewhere.

3. Be patient

Groner bought her three shares of Abbott Labs in 1935. That gave her 75 years of compounded growth!

The power of compounding is critical to developing wealth. If you average just 8% returns annually for 75 years, that's enough to turn $5,000 into $1.6 million.

Odds are you don't have 75 years left in you -- but even shorter periods are still quite powerful. For most of us, 30 years is a more realistic time frame. Combining three decades of compounded growth with strong, flourishing companies can make quite a difference indeed.


Company  Time Span   Avg. Annual Growth   Would Turn $10,000 Into...

PepsiCo   30 years  17.0%    $1.1 million

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)   30 years  15.4%    $740,000

3M (NYSE: MMM)  30 years   12.7%    $357,000

Data: Yahoo! Finance. Average annual growth includes splits and dividends.


Of course, we're never guaranteed long-term growth from one company, but a nest egg diversified across a bunch of solid and growing companies will tend to do well over long periods.

Just remember that letting a winner keep winning for decades means resisting the urge to sell just because the market swoons. Sell if the company no longer seems promising; otherwise, hold on.

4. Don't be afraid to start small

Groner's gift also demonstrates the power of modest amounts of money. Remember, she began with an investment of just $180 in 1935. Adjusted for inflation, that's the equivalent of less than $3,000 in today's dollars -- still not a king's ransom.

In other words, every little bit helps. Small sums invested regularly can go a long way to making us wealthy.

5. Reinvest those dividends

Instead of taking the payouts from her Abbott shares, Groner used them to buy additional shares of stock, which then grew on their own, paying out their own dividends. Over 75 years -- or even 20 or 30 -- those ever-accumulating payouts can become quite powerful.

My colleague Rich Greifner has pointed out that between January 1926 and December 2006, 41% of the S&P 500's total return came from dividends, not price appreciation. Over that time span (just a little longer than Groner had), an investment of $10,000 would have grown to $1 million without dividends. But with dividends reinvested, it would have totaled $24 million. 

Be like Grace

The five lessons listed above helped an amateur investor turn $180 into $7 million. Who knows where they might lead you?



The story of Grace Groner is one of the most elegant and powerful testaments to the quiet, patient power of investing. It's not a story of genius, but of profound simplicity and discipline. Let's elaborate and extract the timeless lessons.

The Expansion: The Anatomy of a $7 Million Secret

Grace Groner's story is captivating precisely because of its modesty. The administrators at Lake Forest College knew a woman who lived humbly in a small, one-bedroom house. They had no idea she was a multimillionaire. The magic lies in how she transformed $180 into $7 million without a high-powered job, without complex trading strategies, and without any visible signs of wealth.

Her entire strategy can be visualized as a simple, five-step virtuous cycle that fueled its own growth for 75 years:























The visual above shows how these principles are not isolated steps, but interconnected forces that work together. Patience and reinvestment form the core engine that is fueled by a modest lifestyle and a simple, quality investment.


The Elaboration: Breaking Down the Five Principles

1. Buy Stocks (But Think Like a Business Owner)

  • The Action: Groner didn't "play the market." She bought a small piece of a real, thriving business she knew well—Abbott Labs, her employer.

  • The "Why": As the data shows, stocks are the greatest wealth-creating vehicle in history. A single dollar invested in stocks in 1802 would have grown to over $755,000 by 2006, dwarfing bonds, gold, and cash. Stocks represent ownership in enterprises that can grow, innovate, and profit for decades.

  • The Lesson: You aren't buying a ticker symbol; you are buying a share of a company's future profits. Adopt the mindset of a business owner, not a gambler.

2. Respect Your Circle of Competence

  • The Action: She invested in what she knew. As an Abbott Labs employee, she had a front-row seat to the company's culture, stability, and products.

  • The "Why": This principle, famously championed by Warren Buffett, protects you from fads and complex businesses you don't understand. It's easier to evaluate the long-term potential of a company whose business model is clear to you.

  • The Lesson: Your professional and personal life gives you expertise. A teacher might understand educational software, a mechanic might understand auto parts companies. Start your investment research within your own circle of knowledge.

3. Be Patient (The 75-Year Virtue)

  • The Action: Groner bought her three shares in 1935 and never sold them. She held through World War II, the Cold War, multiple recessions, and countless market crashes.

  • The "Why": Compounding is not a linear process; it's exponential. The most dramatic gains occur in the later years. The table in the article shows how $10,000 could grow over 30 years in great companies:

    • PepsiCo: $1.1 Million

    • ExxonMobil: $740,000

    • 3M: $357,000

  • The Lesson: The greatest barrier to wealth is not a lack of clever strategies, but a lack of patience. Time in the market is infinitely more important than timing the market. Sell a company if its fundamental promise is broken, not because the market is having a bad day.

4. Don't Be Afraid to Start Small

  • The Action: Her initial investment was just $180 (about $3,000 in today's dollars). She proved you don't need a fortune to start building one.

  • The "Why": Every great oak was once a tiny acorn. A small, disciplined start is far more powerful than a large, one-time investment that never happens because you're "waiting until you have enough money."

  • The Lesson: The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second-best time is now. Start with whatever you can, even if it feels insignificant. Consistency trumps size.

5. Reinvest Those Dividends (The Secret Engine)

  • The Action: This is perhaps the most critical lesson. Groner did not spend her dividend checks. She automatically used them to buy more shares of Abbott stock.

  • The "Why": This is the rocket fuel of compounding. Those new shares would then themselves pay dividends, which would buy even more shares. This creates a self-perpetuating, accelerating cycle of growth. The stunning statistic from the article bears repeating: 41% of the S&P 500's total return from 1926-2006 came from reinvested dividends. Without dividends, $10,000 grew to $1 million. With dividends reinvested, it grew to $24 million.

  • The Lesson: When you invest in dividend-paying stocks, always opt for DRIP (Dividend Reinvestment Plans). Treat dividends not as income to spend, but as employees that go out to recruit more workers (shares) for your wealth-building army.


The Lessons We Can Learn: "Be Like Grace"

Grace Groner's life offers a philosophical blueprint for investing and living.

  1. Wealth is Often Invisible: True wealth isn't about flashy cars or big houses. It's about financial independence and security. Groner chose a life of simplicity, which allowed 100% of her investment returns to keep working for her. Her story frees us from the pressure of "lifestyle inflation."

  2. Simplicity is Sophisticated: In a world of complex financial products, day trading, and crypto-mania, Groner's strategy was breathtakingly simple: Buy a great company, reinvest the dividends, and hold forever. This is a strategy anyone can understand and implement.

  3. Your Legacy is Defined by Your Giving: Groner didn't hoard her wealth. She left it to her alma mater, transforming the lives of countless students. This mirrors the stories of Anne Scheiber and Warren Buffett. It teaches us that the ultimate purpose of wealth is not just personal security, but the ability to make a profound positive impact on the world.

Final Summary:

Grace Groner proved that you don't need a high income, expert knowledge, or luck to build extraordinary wealth. You need a simple, disciplined strategy applied with immense patience. Her $7 million was not the result of a single brilliant decision in 1935, but the result of a quiet, steadfast commitment to doing the right things—and, most importantly, not doing the wrong things like selling, speculating, or spending her dividends—for three-quarters of a century. Her legacy is a powerful reminder that the most reliable path to wealth is open to everyone.