Keep INVESTING Simple and Safe (KISS) ****Investment Philosophy, Strategy and various Valuation Methods**** The same forces that bring risk into investing in the stock market also make possible the large gains many investors enjoy. It’s true that the fluctuations in the market make for losses as well as gains but if you have a proven strategy and stick with it over the long term you will be a winner!****Warren Buffett: Rule No. 1 - Never lose money. Rule No. 2 - Never forget Rule No. 1.
Wednesday, 4 March 2020
Warren Buffett Explains Why Book Value Is No Longer Relevant
The Oracle of Omaha on why cash flows are more important than book value
March 03, 2020
For decades, value investors have used book value per share as a tool to assess a stock's value potential.
This approach began with Benjamin Graham. Widely considered to be the father of value investing, Graham taught his students that any stocks trading below book value were attractive investments because the companies offered a wide margin of safety and low level of risk. To this day, many value investors rely on book value as a shortcut for calculating value.
Buffett on book value
Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio) is perhaps Graham's best-known student. For years, Buffett used book value, among other measures, to asses a business's net worth. He also used book value growth as a yardstick for calculating Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) value creation.
However, as far back as 2000, the Oracle of Omaha started to move away from book value. He explained why at the 2000 annual meeting of Berkshire shareholders. Responding to a shareholder who asked him for his thoughts on using book value to track changes in intrinsic value, Buffett replied:
"The very best businesses, the really wonderful businesses, require no book value. They — and we are — we want to buy businesses, really, that will deliver more and more cash and not need to retain cash, which is what builds up book value over time...
In our case, when we started with Berkshire, intrinsic value was below book value. Our company was not worth book value in early 1965. You could not have sold the assets for that price that they were carried on the books, you could not have — no one could make a calculation, in terms of future cash flows that would indicate that those assets were worth their carrying value. Now it is true that our businesses are worth a great deal more than book value. And that's occurred gradually over time. So obviously, there are a number of years when our intrinsic value grew greater than our book value to get where we are today...
Whether it's The Washington Post or Coca-Cola or Gillette. It's a factor we ignore. We do look at what a company is able to earn on invested assets and what it can earn on incremental invested assets. But the book value, we do not give a thought to."
It is no secret that value as an investing style has underperformed growth over the past decade. There's no obvious explanation as to why this is the case, but one of the explanations could be that the definition of value is out of date. Buffett's comments from the 2000 annual meeting seem to support this conclusion.
No longer a good measure
Book value was an excellent proxy for value when companies relied on large asset bases to produce profits. As the economy has shifted away from asset-intensive businesses and more towards knowledge-intensive companies, book value has become less and less relevant.
What's more, as Buffett explained in 2000, book value does not necessarily represent intrinsic value. Just because a stock is trading below its book value does not necessarily mean it is worth said book value.
The same is true of companies trading at a premium to book. The intrinsic value of that business could be significantly higher than book value as book value does not tend to reflect intangible assets.
Investing is an art, not a science, and valuing businesses is not a straightforward process. Investors cannot rely on a simple metric or shortcut to assess value. Many factors contribute to intrinsic value and intrinsic value growth, and using book value as a proxy for intrinsic value is an outdated method. Even in Graham's time, it wasn't always correct.
https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1063604/warren-buffett-explains-why-book-value-is-no-longer-relevant
Learning From Peter Lynch: How to Survive a Market Correction
In the 1988 Barron's Roundtable, the guru gave some invaluable advice to investors
March 02, 2020
Peter Lynch’s track record at Fidelity Magellan shot him to fame, and to this day, many investors look up to him for advice on equity market investing. Over three decades, he has given many invaluable insights into markets and how they work.
Throughout his tenure at Fidelity, Lynch emphasized the importance of keeping the decision-making process simple. In his book "One Up On Wall Street," the guru revealed that he stumbled upon most of his best investment ideas at the mall when he was least expecting to shop for stocks.
As easy as this investment philosophy might sound, replicating Lynch’s performance can prove to be an impossible task. While there are many stock-picking lessons to learn from him, it seems especially appropriate in the current market correction to analyze how he survived significant market downturns during the period he led the fund, and the techniques he used to do so.
The 1987 market crash
On Oct. 22, 1987, the Dow fell by 508 points, or 23%. This day is now commonly known as Black Monday. This correction is the largest one-day drop in history and needless to say, there was fear and panic among both retail and institutional investors at that time. Peter Lynch was invited to the Barron’s Roundtable in 1988 while the market was still reeling from the massive losses the prior year. Some of the answers he gave the panelists are very relevant today and might help investors approach investing the right way.
Focus on company fundamentals, not on macroeconomic developments
When it comes to investing, it’s important to realize that there are a few variables that are out of the control of an investor. Global macroeconomic developments fall into this category, but investors spend both time and money on trying to be better forecasters of the next recession or the prospects for securing a better trade deal with the United Kingdom.
In 1998, Peter Lynch told Barron’s panelists:
“There’s always something to worry about. But it’s garbage to worry about these things. Philip Morris’s earnings went up about six-fold. in the last 10 years; the stock went up about six-fold. Merck’s earnings are up five-fold in the last 10 years; the stock is up four-fold. I don’t own any of these stocks; I can brag about them.”
He also listed a few stocks, including Avon Products, whose share price had declined drastically following a period of lower-than-expected earnings.
According to Lynch, the real focus of an investor should be on picking winning companies. Company fundamentals will rule over any other external factors in determining the value of an equity security in the long term. Understanding this important relationship could help generate alpha returns.
Today, the travel sector is getting hammered in the market as there’s a widespread fear of reduced travel and leisure activities on a global scale. This is true, but it’s very likely that leading companies in this sector, including Carnival Corporation (NYSE:CCL), will deliver stellar returns in the future. Carnival has very strong competitive advantages over its peers, including an economic moat, which will help it generate solid financial performance in the future, even though 2020 will be tough.
This applies to airline stocks as well. The falling stock prices do not reflect the economic reality that the demand for their services will pick up in the next decade along with the increasing disposable income in many countries across the world. According to Reuters data, business-related travel will also grow exponentially in the next five years, which is another driver of growth for the industry. Contrarian investors might want to research beaten stocks, which is the right decision according to Lynch.
A recession is coming, but there’s nothing to worry about
There’s no doubt that the U.S. economy will eventually reach a peak and report negative growth. This is called the business cycle effect, and there’s no outsmarting this. For centuries, the global economy has behaved this exact same way.
Source: Intelligent Economist
When Lynch was asked whether America was headed toward a recession in 1988, he said:
“Sure, but why should we worry about it? We had the worst recession since the Depression in 1982-’83. We had 14% unemployment, 15% inflation, and a 20% prime rate. But I never got a phone call a year before, saying we were going to have that. The stock market has a 100% record, in the last 50 years, of predicting upturns in the economy. It’s never been wrong. It’s less than 50-50 on a downturn. There will be a recession. But whether it’s going to in ’88 or ’89, I don’t know. Might be ’94. This theory that we have to have a recession every now and then — I’ve looked in the Constitution, stayed up late and read the Bill of Rights, and nowhere is it written that every fifth year we have a recession. People say, “Oh, it’s now so many months, plus a full moon, plus the election, and the Olympics, and therefore we have to have a recession.” It’s so crazy! You can have a good economy for three, four, five years”
He couldn’t have been any clearer about how fruitless it is to worry about the next crash. Nobody has ever been able to do this with any degree of certainty. However, it’s a given that markets will reward companies that are doing well. Whenever economic growth has been positive, broad markets have performed well, which is more than enough reason to trust that this will happen the next time as well. Things looked very gloomy in 2008, when fear was dictating investors’ decision-making processes. What followed was a decade-long bull run that is still intact.
Today, there’s no certainty of when the next recession is going to occur, or whether markets can continue to deliver acceptable returns in the next year. But, it’s a given that the U.S. economy will recover from a downturn regardless of how hard the fall is. With that in mind, investors should follow Lynch and continue their search for attractive investment opportunities.
Winning is almost certain in the long term when the strategy is correct
Many legendary investors, including Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio), have stressed the importance of thinking about the long term and not paying close attention to short term market fluctuations. When asked about the right way to approach markets, Lynch said:
“First, if you’re going to need money within 12 months to pay for a wedding or put a down payment on a house, the stock market is not the place to be. You can flip a coin over where the market is headed over the next year. I have no idea whether the next 1,000 points for the Dow or Nasdaq will be in positive or negative territory. But if you’re in the market for the long haul – 5, 10, or 20 years – then time is on your side and you should stick to your long-term investment plan. I would argue that the next 10,000 and 20,000 points for the market will be up. That’s been the long-term trend. The bottom line is to have a responsible plan for your investments and know what you own and why you own it. There’s too much at stake not to.”
This is invaluable advice for investors. The media, analysts and economists are talking about the impact of the new coronavirus and are in a never-ending race to predict how many points the Dow will drop before staging a comeback. This, however, will most likely end up being a futile task. Not a single analyst even remotely predicted that a virus would break out in the first half of 2020 and that economic growth would be challenged as a result. There was simply no way to do this, and the same is true for attempting to decipher the true economic impact of COVID-19. However, a few years down the line, it will be proven once again that corporate earnings have dictated the performance of markets, not the virus in and of itself.
Takeaway
The one thing that is in the control of an investor is his or her decision-making process. If there’s any liquidity, the best course of action is to invest such funds in the market. Selling when markets crash is not a wise thing to do, as empirical evidence suggests.
Peter Lynch emerged victorious in 1988 because he did not dispose of any of his holdings in 1987, even though markets crashed. Rather, he bought stocks, which went against the grain. Today, the markets are at a tipping point, and investors need to act as boldly as Lynch did to keep any hopes of generating positive returns in 2020.
https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1061797/learning-from-peter-lynch-how-to-survive-a-market-correction
I currently work with leading financial publications including Refinitiv, Seeking Alpha, ValueWalk, GuruFocus, and TradeGrill to produce investment-related content.
I'm a CFA level 2 candidate and an Associate Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment (CISI, UK). During my free time, I enjoy reading.
March 02, 2020
Peter Lynch’s track record at Fidelity Magellan shot him to fame, and to this day, many investors look up to him for advice on equity market investing. Over three decades, he has given many invaluable insights into markets and how they work.
Throughout his tenure at Fidelity, Lynch emphasized the importance of keeping the decision-making process simple. In his book "One Up On Wall Street," the guru revealed that he stumbled upon most of his best investment ideas at the mall when he was least expecting to shop for stocks.
As easy as this investment philosophy might sound, replicating Lynch’s performance can prove to be an impossible task. While there are many stock-picking lessons to learn from him, it seems especially appropriate in the current market correction to analyze how he survived significant market downturns during the period he led the fund, and the techniques he used to do so.
The 1987 market crash
On Oct. 22, 1987, the Dow fell by 508 points, or 23%. This day is now commonly known as Black Monday. This correction is the largest one-day drop in history and needless to say, there was fear and panic among both retail and institutional investors at that time. Peter Lynch was invited to the Barron’s Roundtable in 1988 while the market was still reeling from the massive losses the prior year. Some of the answers he gave the panelists are very relevant today and might help investors approach investing the right way.
Focus on company fundamentals, not on macroeconomic developments
When it comes to investing, it’s important to realize that there are a few variables that are out of the control of an investor. Global macroeconomic developments fall into this category, but investors spend both time and money on trying to be better forecasters of the next recession or the prospects for securing a better trade deal with the United Kingdom.
In 1998, Peter Lynch told Barron’s panelists:
“There’s always something to worry about. But it’s garbage to worry about these things. Philip Morris’s earnings went up about six-fold. in the last 10 years; the stock went up about six-fold. Merck’s earnings are up five-fold in the last 10 years; the stock is up four-fold. I don’t own any of these stocks; I can brag about them.”
He also listed a few stocks, including Avon Products, whose share price had declined drastically following a period of lower-than-expected earnings.
According to Lynch, the real focus of an investor should be on picking winning companies. Company fundamentals will rule over any other external factors in determining the value of an equity security in the long term. Understanding this important relationship could help generate alpha returns.
Today, the travel sector is getting hammered in the market as there’s a widespread fear of reduced travel and leisure activities on a global scale. This is true, but it’s very likely that leading companies in this sector, including Carnival Corporation (NYSE:CCL), will deliver stellar returns in the future. Carnival has very strong competitive advantages over its peers, including an economic moat, which will help it generate solid financial performance in the future, even though 2020 will be tough.
This applies to airline stocks as well. The falling stock prices do not reflect the economic reality that the demand for their services will pick up in the next decade along with the increasing disposable income in many countries across the world. According to Reuters data, business-related travel will also grow exponentially in the next five years, which is another driver of growth for the industry. Contrarian investors might want to research beaten stocks, which is the right decision according to Lynch.
A recession is coming, but there’s nothing to worry about
There’s no doubt that the U.S. economy will eventually reach a peak and report negative growth. This is called the business cycle effect, and there’s no outsmarting this. For centuries, the global economy has behaved this exact same way.
Source: Intelligent Economist
When Lynch was asked whether America was headed toward a recession in 1988, he said:
“Sure, but why should we worry about it? We had the worst recession since the Depression in 1982-’83. We had 14% unemployment, 15% inflation, and a 20% prime rate. But I never got a phone call a year before, saying we were going to have that. The stock market has a 100% record, in the last 50 years, of predicting upturns in the economy. It’s never been wrong. It’s less than 50-50 on a downturn. There will be a recession. But whether it’s going to in ’88 or ’89, I don’t know. Might be ’94. This theory that we have to have a recession every now and then — I’ve looked in the Constitution, stayed up late and read the Bill of Rights, and nowhere is it written that every fifth year we have a recession. People say, “Oh, it’s now so many months, plus a full moon, plus the election, and the Olympics, and therefore we have to have a recession.” It’s so crazy! You can have a good economy for three, four, five years”
He couldn’t have been any clearer about how fruitless it is to worry about the next crash. Nobody has ever been able to do this with any degree of certainty. However, it’s a given that markets will reward companies that are doing well. Whenever economic growth has been positive, broad markets have performed well, which is more than enough reason to trust that this will happen the next time as well. Things looked very gloomy in 2008, when fear was dictating investors’ decision-making processes. What followed was a decade-long bull run that is still intact.
Today, there’s no certainty of when the next recession is going to occur, or whether markets can continue to deliver acceptable returns in the next year. But, it’s a given that the U.S. economy will recover from a downturn regardless of how hard the fall is. With that in mind, investors should follow Lynch and continue their search for attractive investment opportunities.
Winning is almost certain in the long term when the strategy is correct
Many legendary investors, including Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio), have stressed the importance of thinking about the long term and not paying close attention to short term market fluctuations. When asked about the right way to approach markets, Lynch said:
“First, if you’re going to need money within 12 months to pay for a wedding or put a down payment on a house, the stock market is not the place to be. You can flip a coin over where the market is headed over the next year. I have no idea whether the next 1,000 points for the Dow or Nasdaq will be in positive or negative territory. But if you’re in the market for the long haul – 5, 10, or 20 years – then time is on your side and you should stick to your long-term investment plan. I would argue that the next 10,000 and 20,000 points for the market will be up. That’s been the long-term trend. The bottom line is to have a responsible plan for your investments and know what you own and why you own it. There’s too much at stake not to.”
This is invaluable advice for investors. The media, analysts and economists are talking about the impact of the new coronavirus and are in a never-ending race to predict how many points the Dow will drop before staging a comeback. This, however, will most likely end up being a futile task. Not a single analyst even remotely predicted that a virus would break out in the first half of 2020 and that economic growth would be challenged as a result. There was simply no way to do this, and the same is true for attempting to decipher the true economic impact of COVID-19. However, a few years down the line, it will be proven once again that corporate earnings have dictated the performance of markets, not the virus in and of itself.
Takeaway
The one thing that is in the control of an investor is his or her decision-making process. If there’s any liquidity, the best course of action is to invest such funds in the market. Selling when markets crash is not a wise thing to do, as empirical evidence suggests.
Peter Lynch emerged victorious in 1988 because he did not dispose of any of his holdings in 1987, even though markets crashed. Rather, he bought stocks, which went against the grain. Today, the markets are at a tipping point, and investors need to act as boldly as Lynch did to keep any hopes of generating positive returns in 2020.
https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1061797/learning-from-peter-lynch-how-to-survive-a-market-correction
About the author:
Dilantha De Silva
I am an investment professional with 5-years of experience in financial markets. I specialize in U.S. equities and incorporate a top-down approach to identify developing macro-level trends and the companies that would benefit from such trends. I am a strong believer that the best investment opportunities could be found in under-covered equities.I currently work with leading financial publications including Refinitiv, Seeking Alpha, ValueWalk, GuruFocus, and TradeGrill to produce investment-related content.
I'm a CFA level 2 candidate and an Associate Member of the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment (CISI, UK). During my free time, I enjoy reading.
Warren Buffett 2019 Letter: Don't Fret About Market Declines
Some takeaways from the value investor's latest letter to shareholders
February 28, 2020
Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s 2019 letter to investors of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) couldn't have been published at a better time.
The week after the letter was published, markets around the world started plunging. They haven't stopped since.
Luckily, Buffett's letter contained some nuggets of information to help investors keep a cool head in the current turbulent environment.
Buffett's advice for long term-investors
No matter what your opinion of the Oracle of Omaha, you cannot deny that he has a vast amount of experience when it comes to investing. He has been buying and selling stocks and businesses since he was a teenager. That means he has around seven-and-a-half decades of experience in the market.
He has seen it all during this time: market crashes, bubbles, scams, the most prominent corporate failures of all time, conflicts, terrorist attacks, virus outbreaks and everything in between.
As such, Buffett has experience dealing with every market environment. His experience alone means that his advice is worth reading.
Here's what Buffett said in his annual letter when commenting on Berkshire's top equity holdings:
"Charlie and I do not view the $248 billion detailed above as a collection of stock market wagers – dalliances to be terminated because of downgrades by "the Street," an earnings "miss," expected Federal Reserve actions, possible political developments, forecasts by economists or whatever else might be the subject du jour. What we see in our holdings, rather, is an assembly of companies that we partly own and that, on a weighted basis, are earning more than 20% on the net tangible equity capital required to run their businesses."
In other words, Buffett views his investments not as gambling chips in a casino, but as an ownership stake in high-quality businesses.
He went on to state that he and Charlie Munger "have no idea what rates will average over the next year, or ten or thirty years," but that they're confident that stocks will outperform bonds going forward, especially those companies that earn a high return on capital.
Buffett also warned his readers about the unpredictability of the stock market:
"Anything can happen to stock prices tomorrow. Occasionally, there will be major drops in the market, perhaps of 50% magnitude or even greater. But the combination of The American Tailwind, about which I wrote last year, and the compounding wonders described by Mr. Smith [Edgar Lawrence Smith], will make equities the much better long-term choice for the individual who does not use borrowed money and who can control his or her emotions."
Don't worry
These few paragraphs from Buffett give us great insights into his investing mentality. Whenever he looks at a stock, he views it as a business. He's only looking to own high-quality companies with definite competitive advantages, which will help them produce high-double digit returns on invested capital over the long-run.
Buffett's not worried about what happens in the market in the short term. He's also not interested in trying to predict macro developments. His experience has taught him that, over the long run, high-quality businesses outperform, no matter what the macro environment.
We should keep this view in mind in the current market correction. Panicking and selling could be a big mistake. The global economy might suffer if the Covid-19 outbreak becomes a global pandemic, but in five or ten years, this set-back will seem like a distant memory. Companies that suffer a setback will have recovered, and the market's best businesses will undoubtedly be in a better position than they are today.
It is at times like these when it is essential to remember that investing is a marathon, not a sprint.
https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1057672/warren-buffett-2019-letter-dont-fret-about-market-declines
Rupert holds qualifications from the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment and the CFA Society of the UK. He covers everything value investing for ValueWalk and other sites on a freelance basis.
February 28, 2020
Warren Buffett (Trades, Portfolio)'s 2019 letter to investors of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A) (NYSE:BRK.B) couldn't have been published at a better time.
The week after the letter was published, markets around the world started plunging. They haven't stopped since.
Luckily, Buffett's letter contained some nuggets of information to help investors keep a cool head in the current turbulent environment.
Buffett's advice for long term-investors
No matter what your opinion of the Oracle of Omaha, you cannot deny that he has a vast amount of experience when it comes to investing. He has been buying and selling stocks and businesses since he was a teenager. That means he has around seven-and-a-half decades of experience in the market.
He has seen it all during this time: market crashes, bubbles, scams, the most prominent corporate failures of all time, conflicts, terrorist attacks, virus outbreaks and everything in between.
As such, Buffett has experience dealing with every market environment. His experience alone means that his advice is worth reading.
Here's what Buffett said in his annual letter when commenting on Berkshire's top equity holdings:
"Charlie and I do not view the $248 billion detailed above as a collection of stock market wagers – dalliances to be terminated because of downgrades by "the Street," an earnings "miss," expected Federal Reserve actions, possible political developments, forecasts by economists or whatever else might be the subject du jour. What we see in our holdings, rather, is an assembly of companies that we partly own and that, on a weighted basis, are earning more than 20% on the net tangible equity capital required to run their businesses."
In other words, Buffett views his investments not as gambling chips in a casino, but as an ownership stake in high-quality businesses.
He went on to state that he and Charlie Munger "have no idea what rates will average over the next year, or ten or thirty years," but that they're confident that stocks will outperform bonds going forward, especially those companies that earn a high return on capital.
Buffett also warned his readers about the unpredictability of the stock market:
"Anything can happen to stock prices tomorrow. Occasionally, there will be major drops in the market, perhaps of 50% magnitude or even greater. But the combination of The American Tailwind, about which I wrote last year, and the compounding wonders described by Mr. Smith [Edgar Lawrence Smith], will make equities the much better long-term choice for the individual who does not use borrowed money and who can control his or her emotions."
Don't worry
These few paragraphs from Buffett give us great insights into his investing mentality. Whenever he looks at a stock, he views it as a business. He's only looking to own high-quality companies with definite competitive advantages, which will help them produce high-double digit returns on invested capital over the long-run.
Buffett's not worried about what happens in the market in the short term. He's also not interested in trying to predict macro developments. His experience has taught him that, over the long run, high-quality businesses outperform, no matter what the macro environment.
We should keep this view in mind in the current market correction. Panicking and selling could be a big mistake. The global economy might suffer if the Covid-19 outbreak becomes a global pandemic, but in five or ten years, this set-back will seem like a distant memory. Companies that suffer a setback will have recovered, and the market's best businesses will undoubtedly be in a better position than they are today.
It is at times like these when it is essential to remember that investing is a marathon, not a sprint.
https://www.gurufocus.com/news/1057672/warren-buffett-2019-letter-dont-fret-about-market-declines
About the author:
Rupert Hargreaves
Rupert is a committed value investor and regularly writes and invests following the principles set out by Benjamin Graham. He is the editor and co-owner of Hidden Value Stocks, a quarterly investment newsletter aimed at institutional investors.Rupert holds qualifications from the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment and the CFA Society of the UK. He covers everything value investing for ValueWalk and other sites on a freelance basis.
The 10-year Treasury note yield just broke below 1%.
The 10-year Treasury note yield TMUBMUSD10Y, -1.71% tumbled 12.4 basis points to 0.967%, carving out a record intraday low of 0.914% in Tuesday trading, according to Tradeweb data.
The direction of the benchmark maturity’s yield is important for economists, households and central bankers as it serves as a benchmark for all kinds of loans including long-term mortgages. The long-dated bond also serves as a broader barometer of how easy it is to borrow money, and an indication of how investors perceive the U.S. economy’s prospects.
Analysts say the Fed’s move to ease monetary policy ahead of its scheduled policy meeting in two weeks suggests the central bank wanted to demonstrate its willingness to act, in line with research by Fed officials suggesting that early and aggressive rate cuts are more effective when interest rates are near zero.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-10-year-treasury-note-yield-just-broke-below-1-heres-how-it-happened-2020-03-03
The direction of the benchmark maturity’s yield is important for economists, households and central bankers as it serves as a benchmark for all kinds of loans including long-term mortgages. The long-dated bond also serves as a broader barometer of how easy it is to borrow money, and an indication of how investors perceive the U.S. economy’s prospects.
Analysts say the Fed’s move to ease monetary policy ahead of its scheduled policy meeting in two weeks suggests the central bank wanted to demonstrate its willingness to act, in line with research by Fed officials suggesting that early and aggressive rate cuts are more effective when interest rates are near zero.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-10-year-treasury-note-yield-just-broke-below-1-heres-how-it-happened-2020-03-03
The U.S. bond-market’s benchmark yield plunged below 1% on Tuesday, a possibility that few analysts and investors contemplated at the beginning of the year.
Investors have attributed the slide in U.S. Treasury yields to a combination of factors including
- slower global economic growth,
- the attraction of a positive return when negative-yielding debt is the alternative in Europe and Japan abroad, and
- the absence of any inflation threat.
But in the end, the spark for the furious rally in Treasurys on Tuesday came from a less abstract source:
- a surprise 50 basis point interest rate cut from the Federal Reserve to counteract worries that the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic would deliver a painful blow to consumer and market confidence.
Here’s the real reason Warren Buffett is sitting on a record $128 billion in cash, according to one strategist
Published: Mar 2, 2020 1:31 p.m. ET
Warren Buffett, ever the beacon of market optimism, appears to be positively bullish about where stocks are headed from here.
The Berkshire Hathaway BRK.A, -3.26% boss made that clear in his annual letter to shareholders in which he wrote of the “American Tailwind” and made the case for staying invested in stocks.
“If something close to current rates should prevail over the coming decades and if corporate tax rates also remain near the low level businesses now enjoy, it is almost certain that equities will over time perform far better than long-term, fixed-rate debt instruments,” Buffett said in the letter.
But this chart of Buffett’s record cash pile, courtesy of RIA Advisors strategist Lance Roberts, seems to tell a different story — one in which what Buffett is saying looks a whole lot different from what Buffett is actually doing:
“As the old saying goes: ‘Follow the money,’” Roberts wrote in a post on his Real Investment Advice blog. “If he thinks stocks will outperform bonds why is holding $128 billion in short-term bonds?”
While the obvious take is that Buffett is just waiting for a good deal to come along so he can snap it up, another is that he’s not as optimistic as he lets on. Maybe, as Roberts suggests, the answer actually lies in a pair of charts.
This one takes a look at the Shiller price-to-earnings ratio, which is currently around 30x, to project 10-year total returns using history as a guide:
As you can see, a lot of red ink has spilled in the years following valuations like the one we’re currently seeing in the stock market.
Here’s another way to look at it, using the “Buffett Indicator”:
Just look at what happened the last few times Buffett’s favorite valuation measure was elevated. Again, forward return expectations, as several indicators clearly show, are markedly lower over the following 10 years.
Roberts says investors might want to exercise some caution before they follow Buffett’s “do as I say, not as I do” advice and buy and hold index funds.
“Buffett did not amass his fortune by following the herd but by leading it,” Roberts wrote. “He is sitting on a $128 billion in cash for a reason. Buffett is fully aware of the gains he has forgone, yet still continues his ways. Buffet is not dumb!”
Sitting on cash, for the first time in awhile, was not the place to be in Monday’s session as the Dow DJIA, -2.94% , S&P SPX, -2.81% and Nasdaq COMP, -2.99% were all staging strong rebounds.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-the-real-reason-warren-buffett-is-sitting-on-a-record-128-billion-in-cash-according-to-one-strategist-2020-03-02?fbclid=IwAR1WhwQ03BmZ49y4Uw1qDww03MApd5mz4anVVLCYOG35X7vdHcL-nduryls
Tuesday, 3 March 2020
How a 27-year-old millionaire in the Seattle area spends his money
27-year-old millionaire who saves 80% of his income refuses to spend on 2 things
Mar 2 2020
Kathleen Elkins
@KATHLEEN_ELK
Todd Baldwin’s net worth crossed $1 million when he was 25.
Today, at 27, he brings in $615,000 annually ($305,000 after business expenses) thanks to a mix of
The majority of his revenue comes from the six rental properties that he owns with his wife, Angela: They earn $460,000 per year in rent. After expenses, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and utilities, they keep about $150,000 of that per year.
“Although our net worth is seven figures, we don’t do a lot of the typical things that most people envision millionaires doing. We are super frugal,” says Baldwin, who wears a $12 rubber wedding band and shares a 2009 Ford Focus with his wife. Because he keeps his expenses so low, he’s able to save more than 80% of his take-home pay.
The millennial millionaire refuses to spend money on a couple of things, he tells CNBC Make It: For starters, he won’t pay for entertainment, like restaurants and the movies, “but only because I know how to get paid for that.”
Baldwin is a “secret shopper” and gets paid for dining out, going grocery shopping, seeing movies and even visiting hotels and casinos.
“There are a lot of businesses out there that want to know how their employees are doing and how the market is responding to their products,” he explains. “So those companies will hire mystery shopping firms to find independent contractors like me to go pose at their establishment as a regular customer, buy the product or service and then report on it.”
He’s made about $30,000 since he started mystery shopping years ago in college. The surveys he fills out after the experience aren’t too time consuming, and for that reason, he has a hard time justifying spending money at bars and restaurants. “If a buddy wants to go to a bar or someone wants to go see a movie, I usually try to wait until I can get a mystery shop,” he says, “because if you’re going to go there anyway, you might as well get it for free and get paid on the top.”
Thanks to secret shopping, he and his wife spend just about $25 a month on food.
“Another thing that I’ll never spend money on is unnecessary bank account fees or credit card fees,” says Baldwin. That’s not to say he doesn’t use credit cards — he has 13 of them — but he never racks up a balance and makes payments on time to avoid late fees.
Baldwin, who was raised by a single mom and started working when he was 12, gets a thrill out of saving. “It’s actually really fun being able to buy something and then choosing not to,” he says.
He thinks through all of his purchases, especially the big ones: “My wife and I want to start a family in the next couple of years, and I was thinking we might get an SUV. I was looking at ones that were about $60,000.” After running the numbers, though, they decided to redirect that money elsewhere. “We took the 60 grand and bought another rental property — and now that property cash flow is $4,000 per month.”
Eventually, the rental income “could pay for four of those SUVs that I liked,” he adds.
The only time Baldwin likes to splurge is if it’s something for his wife — if he’s allowed to, that is. “My wife is more frugal than I am!” he says. “A couple years ago, I bought her a designer purse for like 500 bucks. But when I surprised her with it, she immediately took it back, exchanged it for a $60 purse at Macy’s and then we invested the difference.”
“So we don’t normally splurge.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/01/millennial-millionaire-shares-what-he-refuses-to-spend-money-on.html
Mar 2 2020
Kathleen Elkins
@KATHLEEN_ELK
Todd Baldwin’s net worth crossed $1 million when he was 25.
Today, at 27, he brings in $615,000 annually ($305,000 after business expenses) thanks to a mix of
- income from rental properties,
- his day job working in commercial insurance sales and
- the extra cash he makes as a secret shopper.
The majority of his revenue comes from the six rental properties that he owns with his wife, Angela: They earn $460,000 per year in rent. After expenses, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and utilities, they keep about $150,000 of that per year.
“Although our net worth is seven figures, we don’t do a lot of the typical things that most people envision millionaires doing. We are super frugal,” says Baldwin, who wears a $12 rubber wedding band and shares a 2009 Ford Focus with his wife. Because he keeps his expenses so low, he’s able to save more than 80% of his take-home pay.
The millennial millionaire refuses to spend money on a couple of things, he tells CNBC Make It: For starters, he won’t pay for entertainment, like restaurants and the movies, “but only because I know how to get paid for that.”
Baldwin is a “secret shopper” and gets paid for dining out, going grocery shopping, seeing movies and even visiting hotels and casinos.
“There are a lot of businesses out there that want to know how their employees are doing and how the market is responding to their products,” he explains. “So those companies will hire mystery shopping firms to find independent contractors like me to go pose at their establishment as a regular customer, buy the product or service and then report on it.”
He’s made about $30,000 since he started mystery shopping years ago in college. The surveys he fills out after the experience aren’t too time consuming, and for that reason, he has a hard time justifying spending money at bars and restaurants. “If a buddy wants to go to a bar or someone wants to go see a movie, I usually try to wait until I can get a mystery shop,” he says, “because if you’re going to go there anyway, you might as well get it for free and get paid on the top.”
Thanks to secret shopping, he and his wife spend just about $25 a month on food.
“Another thing that I’ll never spend money on is unnecessary bank account fees or credit card fees,” says Baldwin. That’s not to say he doesn’t use credit cards — he has 13 of them — but he never racks up a balance and makes payments on time to avoid late fees.
Baldwin, who was raised by a single mom and started working when he was 12, gets a thrill out of saving. “It’s actually really fun being able to buy something and then choosing not to,” he says.
He thinks through all of his purchases, especially the big ones: “My wife and I want to start a family in the next couple of years, and I was thinking we might get an SUV. I was looking at ones that were about $60,000.” After running the numbers, though, they decided to redirect that money elsewhere. “We took the 60 grand and bought another rental property — and now that property cash flow is $4,000 per month.”
Eventually, the rental income “could pay for four of those SUVs that I liked,” he adds.
The only time Baldwin likes to splurge is if it’s something for his wife — if he’s allowed to, that is. “My wife is more frugal than I am!” he says. “A couple years ago, I bought her a designer purse for like 500 bucks. But when I surprised her with it, she immediately took it back, exchanged it for a $60 purse at Macy’s and then we invested the difference.”
“So we don’t normally splurge.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/01/millennial-millionaire-shares-what-he-refuses-to-spend-money-on.html
Thursday, 13 February 2020
John Maynard Keynes - Courage is the Key to Investing
From 1922 through 1946, Keynes’ stock portfolio outperformed the U.K. stock market by an average of nearly six percentage points annually — over a period covering the worst market crash, the worst economic depression and the worst war in modern history.
Keynes didn’t look like a great investor all the time.
As a value investor, focused on buying stocks at bargain prices, he got left behind in the torrid bull market of the 1920s. Keynes didn’t see the Great Depression coming; he went into the Crash of 1929 with roughly 90% of the college’s funds in stocks even though, at the time, most other endowments overwhelmingly preferred bonds.
By late 1929 Keynes had cumulatively underperformed the British stock market by 40 percentage points over the preceding five years.
But he was already turning his performance around.
How Keynes mustered the courage to invest heavily in U.S. stocks devastated by the crash and the ensuing depression.
Keynes had almost entirely ignored U.S. stocks in the college’s endowment until September 1930. What a time to get interested!
The U.S. stock market had fallen 38.4% over the preceding 12 months. But Keynes was so excited by the bargains he saw opening up in the U.S. that he worked with a small New York brokerage, Case Pomeroy & Co., to research the market and his own stock ideas.
In 1931, when U.S. stocks fell a bloodcurdling 47.1%, and again in 1934, when they dropped another 5.9%, Keynes traveled to the U.S., spending much of his time meeting people on Wall Street, in government and in business who could help him research his investment ideas.
He bought U.S. stocks throughout the depression.
When they fell another 38.6% in 1937, Keynes, undaunted, bought still more.
By 1939, he had put half his main portfolio for the college in U.S. companies, favoring
Buy when blood was running in the streets
Keynes’ words still ring with the resolve it must have taken to buy when blood was running in the streets:
“The spectacle of modern investment markets has sometimes moved me towards the conclusion that to make the purchase of an investment permanent and indissoluble, like marriage, except by reason of death or other grave cause, might be a useful remedy for our contemporary evils. For this would force the investor to direct his mind to the long-term prospects and to those only.”
Bear markets are unpredictable, reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible
Keynes understood, as did his contemporary, the American value investor Benjamin Graham, that bear markets are so unpredictable that reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible — and that the pain of losing money is nearly unbearable.
Buying into bear markets is the way to prevail
Still, Keynes knew, barging into bear markets to buy, rather than trying to sidestep them, is the way to prevail. Since, over the long run, stocks tend to go up more than they go down, one of the greatest advantages an investor can have is the gumption to buy stocks aggressively in falling markets.
That requires both cash and courage.
With stocks still not far from their record highs today, sitting on some cash is a better idea than ever.
And — unless you’re in or near retirement, in which case you should probably be scaling back on stocks already — steel your courage. Write a binding contract with yourself, witnessed by a friend or family member, committing you to buy more stocks when they fall 25%, 50% or more. Years from now, you’ll be glad you did.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/10/14/john-maynard-keynes-courage-is-the-key-to-investing/
Keynes didn’t look like a great investor all the time.
As a value investor, focused on buying stocks at bargain prices, he got left behind in the torrid bull market of the 1920s. Keynes didn’t see the Great Depression coming; he went into the Crash of 1929 with roughly 90% of the college’s funds in stocks even though, at the time, most other endowments overwhelmingly preferred bonds.
By late 1929 Keynes had cumulatively underperformed the British stock market by 40 percentage points over the preceding five years.
But he was already turning his performance around.
How Keynes mustered the courage to invest heavily in U.S. stocks devastated by the crash and the ensuing depression.
Keynes had almost entirely ignored U.S. stocks in the college’s endowment until September 1930. What a time to get interested!
The U.S. stock market had fallen 38.4% over the preceding 12 months. But Keynes was so excited by the bargains he saw opening up in the U.S. that he worked with a small New York brokerage, Case Pomeroy & Co., to research the market and his own stock ideas.
In 1931, when U.S. stocks fell a bloodcurdling 47.1%, and again in 1934, when they dropped another 5.9%, Keynes traveled to the U.S., spending much of his time meeting people on Wall Street, in government and in business who could help him research his investment ideas.
He bought U.S. stocks throughout the depression.
When they fell another 38.6% in 1937, Keynes, undaunted, bought still more.
By 1939, he had put half his main portfolio for the college in U.S. companies, favoring
- high-dividend-paying preferred stocks,
- investment trusts (diversified stock portfolios similar to today’s mutual funds) and, later on,
- public utilities.
Buy when blood was running in the streets
Keynes’ words still ring with the resolve it must have taken to buy when blood was running in the streets:
“The spectacle of modern investment markets has sometimes moved me towards the conclusion that to make the purchase of an investment permanent and indissoluble, like marriage, except by reason of death or other grave cause, might be a useful remedy for our contemporary evils. For this would force the investor to direct his mind to the long-term prospects and to those only.”
Bear markets are unpredictable, reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible
Keynes understood, as did his contemporary, the American value investor Benjamin Graham, that bear markets are so unpredictable that reliably sidestepping them is nearly impossible — and that the pain of losing money is nearly unbearable.
Buying into bear markets is the way to prevail
Still, Keynes knew, barging into bear markets to buy, rather than trying to sidestep them, is the way to prevail. Since, over the long run, stocks tend to go up more than they go down, one of the greatest advantages an investor can have is the gumption to buy stocks aggressively in falling markets.
That requires both cash and courage.
With stocks still not far from their record highs today, sitting on some cash is a better idea than ever.
And — unless you’re in or near retirement, in which case you should probably be scaling back on stocks already — steel your courage. Write a binding contract with yourself, witnessed by a friend or family member, committing you to buy more stocks when they fall 25%, 50% or more. Years from now, you’ll be glad you did.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2016/10/14/john-maynard-keynes-courage-is-the-key-to-investing/
Friday, 17 January 2020
Independent Thinking
"You are neither right or wrong
because the crowd disagrees with
you. You are right because your
data and reasoning are right."
-Benjamin Graham
"The most difficult thing in business
is first getting yourself to thinking and
then getting others to thinking."
-Harvey Firestone
"Apply logic to help avoid fooling
yourself. Charlie will not accept
anything I say just because I say it,
although most of the world will."
-Warren Buffett
"Never fool yourself, and remember
that you are the easiest person to fool."
- Richard P. Feynman
Warren and Charlie on "Moats"
Buffett: "So we think in terms of that moat and the ability to keep its width and its impossibility of being crossed as the primary criterion of a great business. And we tell our managers we want the moat widened every year. That doesn't necessarily mean the profit will be more this year than it was last year because it won't be sometimes. However, if the moat is widened every year, the business will do very well. When we see a moat that's tenuous in any way - it's just too risky. We don't know how to evaluate that. And, therefore, we leave it alone. We think that all of our businesses - or virtually all of our businesses - have pretty darned good moats. And we think the managers are widening them.
Charlie?"
Munger: "How could you say it better?"
Buffen: "Sure. Have some peanut brittle on that one."
- From the 2000 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting
Charlie?"
Munger: "How could you say it better?"
Buffen: "Sure. Have some peanut brittle on that one."
- From the 2000 Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting
Philip Fisherr, author of Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits
Philip Fisher (1907-2004), author of Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, among many other books, began his investment career in 1931.
Like Ben Graham, he achieved impressive results over his lifetime, but Fisher did it with a markedly different approach.
Unlike Graham, who typically invested in statistically cheap "cigar-butts" (with the notable exception of GEICO), Fisher preferred to buy and hold the stocks of high-quality companies that could, "grow and grow and grow."
Like Ben Graham, he achieved impressive results over his lifetime, but Fisher did it with a markedly different approach.
Unlike Graham, who typically invested in statistically cheap "cigar-butts" (with the notable exception of GEICO), Fisher preferred to buy and hold the stocks of high-quality companies that could, "grow and grow and grow."
Thursday, 16 January 2020
Evaluating Investment Results of Your Money Manager
The decision to employ an investment professional should only
be made after a thorough analysis of the past investment performance of the individual or organization under consideration.
Some questions are obvious:
Obviously a manager who has achieved dismal long-term results is not someone to hire to manage your money. Nevertheless, you would not necessarily hire the best-performing manager for a recent period either.
When you get right down to it, it is simple to compare managers by their investment returns. It is far more difficult - impossible except in retrospect - to evaluate the risks that managers incurred to achieve their results.
Investment returns for a brief period are, of course, affected by luck. The laws of probability tell us that almost anyone can achieve phenomenal success over any given measurement period. It is the task of those evaluating a money manager to ascertain how much of their past success is due to luck and how much to skill.
Many investors mistakenly choose their money managers the same way they pick horses at the race track. They see who has performed well lately and bet on them. It is helpful to recognize that there are cycles of investment fashion; different investment approaches go into and out of favor, coincident with recent fluctuations in the results obtained by practitioners. If a manager with a good long-term record has a poor recent one, he or she may be specializing in an area that is temporarily out of favor. If so, the returns achieved could regress to their long-term mean as the cycle turns over time; several poor years could certainly be followed by several strong ones.
Finally, one of the most important matters for an investor to consider is personal compatibility with a manager.
Once a money manager has been hired, clients must monitor his or her behavior and results on an ongoing basis. The issues that were addressed in hiring a manager are the same ones to consider after you have hired one.
Some questions are obvious:
- How long a track record is there?
- Was it achieved over one or more market and economic cycles?
- Was it achieved by the same person who will manage your money, and does it represent the complete results of this manager's entire investment career or only the results achieved during some favorable period? (Everyone, of course, will be able to extract some period of good performance even from a lengthy record of mediocrity.)
- Did this manager invest conservatively in down markets, or did clients lose money?
- Were the results fairly steady over time, or were they volatile?
- Was the record the result of one or two spectacular successes or of numerous moderate winners?
- If this manager's record turns mediocre after one or two spectacular successes are excluded, is there a sound reason to expect more home runs in the future?
- Is this manager still following the same strategy that was employed to achieve his or her past successes?
Obviously a manager who has achieved dismal long-term results is not someone to hire to manage your money. Nevertheless, you would not necessarily hire the best-performing manager for a recent period either.
- Returns must always be examined in the context of risk.
- Consider asking whether the I manager was fully invested at all times or even more than 100 percent invested through the use of borrowed money. (Leverage is neither necessary nor appropriate for most investors.)
- Contrariwise, if the manager achieved good results despite having held substantial amounts of cash and cash equivalents, this could indicate a low-risk approach.
- Were the investments in the underlying portfolio themselves particularly risky, such as the shares of highly leveraged companies?
- Conversely, did the manager reduce portfolio risk through diversification or hedging or by investing in senior securities?
When you get right down to it, it is simple to compare managers by their investment returns. It is far more difficult - impossible except in retrospect - to evaluate the risks that managers incurred to achieve their results.
Investment returns for a brief period are, of course, affected by luck. The laws of probability tell us that almost anyone can achieve phenomenal success over any given measurement period. It is the task of those evaluating a money manager to ascertain how much of their past success is due to luck and how much to skill.
Many investors mistakenly choose their money managers the same way they pick horses at the race track. They see who has performed well lately and bet on them. It is helpful to recognize that there are cycles of investment fashion; different investment approaches go into and out of favor, coincident with recent fluctuations in the results obtained by practitioners. If a manager with a good long-term record has a poor recent one, he or she may be specializing in an area that is temporarily out of favor. If so, the returns achieved could regress to their long-term mean as the cycle turns over time; several poor years could certainly be followed by several strong ones.
Finally, one of the most important matters for an investor to consider is personal compatibility with a manager.
- If personal rapport with a financial professional is lacking, the relationship will not last.
- Similarly, if there is not a level of comfort with the particular investment approach, the choice of manager is a poor one.
- A conservative investor may not feel comfortable with a professional short-seller no matter how favorable the results; by contrast, an aggressive investor may not be compatible with a manager who buys securities and holds them.
Once a money manager has been hired, clients must monitor his or her behavior and results on an ongoing basis. The issues that were addressed in hiring a manager are the same ones to consider after you have hired one.
Evaluating Discretionary Stockbrokers and Money Managers
Some stockbrokers function as money managers, having discretionary investment authority over some or all of their clients'
funds. Practices such as these may entail serious conflicts of
interest since compensation is made on the basis of trading
commissions rather than investment results. Nevertheless, you
would select a discretionary stockbroker just as you would
choose a money manager. The questions to be asked are virtually identical. In both cases, while there are large pools of people from whom to choose, selecting someone to handle your
money with prudence and fiduciary responsibility is never easy.
The ultimate challenge in selecting a stockbroker or money manager is
How do you begin to evaluate stockbrokers and money managers?
There are several important areas of inquiry, and one or more personal interviews are absolutely essential.
There is no better place to begin one's investigation than with personal ethics.
Another area of inquiry concerns the fair treatment of clients.
A third area of interest concerns the likelihood of achieving good investment results.
A fourth area of inquiry concerns the investment philosophy of the manager.
The ultimate challenge in selecting a stockbroker or money manager is
- understanding precisely what they do,
- evaluating the validity of their investment approaches (do they make sense?) and
- their integrity (do they do what is promised, and is it in your best interest?).
How do you begin to evaluate stockbrokers and money managers?
There are several important areas of inquiry, and one or more personal interviews are absolutely essential.
There is no better place to begin one's investigation than with personal ethics.
- Do they "eat home cooking"- managing their own money in parallel with their clients'?
- I can think of no more important test of the integrity of a manager and the likelihood of investment success than his or her own confidence in the approach pursued on behalf of clients.
- It is interesting to note that few, if any, junk-bond managers invested their own money in junk bonds. In other words, they ate out.
Another area of inquiry concerns the fair treatment of clients.
- Are all clients treated equally? If not, why not, and in what ways?
- Are transactions performed for all clients contemporaneously? If not, what method is used to ensure fairness?
A third area of interest concerns the likelihood of achieving good investment results.
- Specifically, does the broker or money manager oversee a reasonably sized portfolio, or have the assets under management grown exceedingly large?
- One way to judge is to examine the manager's track record since the assets under his or her control reached approximately the current level. Investors can also examine the records of other managers to determine in general how increased size affects performance.
- From experience, large increases in assets under management adversely affect returns. The precise amount that can be managed successfully depends on the specific investment strategy employed as well as the skills of the manager under consideration.
A fourth area of inquiry concerns the investment philosophy of the manager.
- Does the broker or money manager have an intelligent strategy that is likely to result in long-term investment success? (Obviously, a value-investment strategy would be optimal.)
- Does he or she worry about absolute returns, about what can go wrong, or is he or she caught up in the relative-performance game?
- Are arbitrary constraints and silly rules, such as remaining fully invested at all times, absent?
Mutual Funds
Mutual funds are, in theory, an attractive alternative for the
individual investor, combining
For one thing, investors should certainly prefer no-load over load funds; the latter charge a sizable up-front fee, which is used to pay commissions to salespeople. Unlike closed-end funds, which have a fixed number of shares that fluctuate in price according to supply and demand, open-end funds issue new shares and redeem shares in response to investor interest. The share price of open-end funds is always equal to net asset value, which is based on the current market prices of the underlying holdings. Because of the redemption feature that ensures both liquidity and the ability to realize current net asset value, open-end funds are generally more attractive for investors than closed-end funds.'
Unfortunately for their shareholders, because open-end mutual funds attract and lose assets in accordance with recent results, many fund managers are participants in the short-term relative-performance derby. Like other institutional investors, mutual fund organizations profit from management fees charged as a percentage of the assets under management; their fees are not based directly on results. Consequently, the fear of asset outflows resulting from poor relative performance generates considerable pressure to go along with the investment crowd.
Another problem is that open-end mutual funds have in recent years attracted (and even encouraged) "hot" money from speculators looking to earn quick profits without the risk or bother of direct stock ownership. Many highly specialized mutual funds (e.g., biotechnology, environmental, Third World) have been established in order to exploit investors' interests in the latest market fad. Mutual-fund-marketing organizations have gone out of their way to encourage and even incite investor enthusiasm, setting up retail mutual fund stores, providing hourly fund pricing, and authorizing switching among their funds by telephone. They do not discourage the mutual fund newsletters and switching services that have sprouted up to accommodate the "needs" of hot-money investors.
Some open-end mutual funds do have a long-term value investment orientation. These funds have a large base of loyal, long-term-oriented shareholders, which reduces the risk of substantial redemptions that could precipitate the forced liquidation of undervalued positions into a depressed market. The Mutual Series Funds and the Sequoia Fund, Inc., are among some favorites; the Sequoia Fund, Inc., has been completely closed to new investors in recent years, while some of the Mutual Series Funds periodically open to accommodate new investors.
- professional management,
- low transaction costs,
- immediate liquidity, and
- reasonable diversification.
For one thing, investors should certainly prefer no-load over load funds; the latter charge a sizable up-front fee, which is used to pay commissions to salespeople. Unlike closed-end funds, which have a fixed number of shares that fluctuate in price according to supply and demand, open-end funds issue new shares and redeem shares in response to investor interest. The share price of open-end funds is always equal to net asset value, which is based on the current market prices of the underlying holdings. Because of the redemption feature that ensures both liquidity and the ability to realize current net asset value, open-end funds are generally more attractive for investors than closed-end funds.'
Unfortunately for their shareholders, because open-end mutual funds attract and lose assets in accordance with recent results, many fund managers are participants in the short-term relative-performance derby. Like other institutional investors, mutual fund organizations profit from management fees charged as a percentage of the assets under management; their fees are not based directly on results. Consequently, the fear of asset outflows resulting from poor relative performance generates considerable pressure to go along with the investment crowd.
Another problem is that open-end mutual funds have in recent years attracted (and even encouraged) "hot" money from speculators looking to earn quick profits without the risk or bother of direct stock ownership. Many highly specialized mutual funds (e.g., biotechnology, environmental, Third World) have been established in order to exploit investors' interests in the latest market fad. Mutual-fund-marketing organizations have gone out of their way to encourage and even incite investor enthusiasm, setting up retail mutual fund stores, providing hourly fund pricing, and authorizing switching among their funds by telephone. They do not discourage the mutual fund newsletters and switching services that have sprouted up to accommodate the "needs" of hot-money investors.
Some open-end mutual funds do have a long-term value investment orientation. These funds have a large base of loyal, long-term-oriented shareholders, which reduces the risk of substantial redemptions that could precipitate the forced liquidation of undervalued positions into a depressed market. The Mutual Series Funds and the Sequoia Fund, Inc., are among some favorites; the Sequoia Fund, Inc., has been completely closed to new investors in recent years, while some of the Mutual Series Funds periodically open to accommodate new investors.
Investment Alternatives for the Individual Investor
The unfortunate fact is that the individual investor has few, if any, attractive investment alternatives.
Investing, it should be clear by now, is a full-time job.
Given the vast amount of information available for review and analysis and the complexity of the investment task, a part-time or sporadic effort by an individual investor has little chance of achieving long-term success.
It is not necessary, or even desirable, to be a professional investor, but a significant, ongoing commitment of time is a prerequisite.
Individuals who cannot devote substantial time to their own investment activities have three alternatives:
- mutual funds,
- discretionary stockbrokers, or
- money managers.
Good Portfolio Management and Trading are of maximum value when used with an Appropriate Investment Philosophy
Here are a number of issues that investors
should consider in managing their portfolios.
While individual personalities and goals can influence one's trading and portfolio management techniques to some degree, sound buying and selling strategies, appropriate diversification, and prudent hedging are of importance to all investors.
Of course, good portfolio management and trading are of no use when pursuing an inappropriate investment philosophy; they are of maximum value when employed in conjunction with a value investment approach.
While individual personalities and goals can influence one's trading and portfolio management techniques to some degree, sound buying and selling strategies, appropriate diversification, and prudent hedging are of importance to all investors.
Of course, good portfolio management and trading are of no use when pursuing an inappropriate investment philosophy; they are of maximum value when employed in conjunction with a value investment approach.
Use a Broker to Whom You Are Important
Whether buying or selling, there are distinct advantages to finding and doing business with long-term-oriented stockbrokers
who recognize that it is in their interest to build and maintain
mutually beneficial relationships with clients.
The challenge is to find one or more brokers with whom you feel comfortable.
Michael Price and Bill Ruane would have
no problem capturing the undivided attention of any broker;
they would be very important clients for anyone.
- If customers feel that their best interests are being served and that brokerage commissions are a secondary consideration, long-term relationships are likely to ensue.
- By contrast, brokers who charge exorbitant commissions or routinely recommend trades designed more to generate commissions than investment profits will eventually lose customers.
The challenge is to find one or more brokers with whom you feel comfortable.
- An appropriate broker will possess a balance of experience and desire, a commitment to the investment business, and a willingness to sacrifice immediate commissions for the sake of long-term relationships.
- You want a broker with sufficient clout within his or her firm to provide you with access to analysts and traders, one with experience to handle your account properly and to know when to call you and when not to waste your time.
- You don't want a totally inexperienced broker who is learning at your expense, a complacent broker satisfied with mediocre results, or one so successful that your account is relatively unimportant.
- Other investors must work harder to find one or more brokers to whom they will be important clients.
- One possibility is to develop a relationship with a fairly young but capable broker to whom your account is currently very important and one who will gain importance and clout within the firm over time.
Comments:
I may have to look for a few more brokers to find out more. :-)
Selling: The Hardest Decision of All
Many investors are able to spot a bargain but have a harder
time knowing when to sell.
To deal with the difficulty of knowing when to sell, some investors create rules for selling based on specific price-to-book value or price-to-earnings multiples. Others have rules based on percentage gain thresholds; once they have made X percent, they sell. Still others set sale price targets at the time of purchase, as if nothing that took place in the interim could influence the decision to sell. None of these rules makes good sense. Indeed, there is only one valid rule for selling: all investments are for sale at the right price.
Decisions to Sell
Decisions to sell, like decisions to buy, must be based upon underlying business value.' Exactly when to sell-or buy depends on the alternative opportunities that are available.
Some investors place stop-loss orders to sell securities at specific prices, usually marginally below their cost. If prices rise, the orders are not executed. If the prices decline a bit, presumably on the way to a steeper fall, the stop-loss orders are executed. Although this strategy may seem an effective way to limit downside risk, it is, in fact, crazy. Instead of taking advantage of market dips to increase one's holdings, a user of this technique acts as if the market knows the merits of a particular investment better than he or she does.
Liquidity considerations are also important in the decision to sell.
If selling still seems difficult for investors who follow a value investment philosophy, I offer the following rhetorical questions: If you haven't bought based upon underlying value, how do you decide when to sell?
- One reason is the difficulty of knowing precisely what an investment is worth.
- An investor buys with a range of value in mind at a price that provides a considerable margin of safety.
- As the market price appreciates, however, that safety margin decreases; the potential return diminishes and the downside risk increases.
- Not knowing the exact value of the investment, it is understandable that an investor cannot be as confident in the sell decision as he or she was in the purchase decision.
To deal with the difficulty of knowing when to sell, some investors create rules for selling based on specific price-to-book value or price-to-earnings multiples. Others have rules based on percentage gain thresholds; once they have made X percent, they sell. Still others set sale price targets at the time of purchase, as if nothing that took place in the interim could influence the decision to sell. None of these rules makes good sense. Indeed, there is only one valid rule for selling: all investments are for sale at the right price.
Decisions to Sell
Decisions to sell, like decisions to buy, must be based upon underlying business value.' Exactly when to sell-or buy depends on the alternative opportunities that are available.
- Should you hold for partial or complete value realization, for example?
- It would be foolish to hold out for an extra fraction of a point of gain in a stock selling just below underlying value when the market offers many bargains.
- By contrast, you would not want to sell a stock at a gain (and pay taxes on it) if it were still significantly undervalued and if there were no better bargains available.
Some investors place stop-loss orders to sell securities at specific prices, usually marginally below their cost. If prices rise, the orders are not executed. If the prices decline a bit, presumably on the way to a steeper fall, the stop-loss orders are executed. Although this strategy may seem an effective way to limit downside risk, it is, in fact, crazy. Instead of taking advantage of market dips to increase one's holdings, a user of this technique acts as if the market knows the merits of a particular investment better than he or she does.
Liquidity considerations are also important in the decision to sell.
- For many securities the depth of the market as well as the quoted price is an important consideration.
- You cannot sell, after all, in the absence of a willing buyer; the likely presence of a buyer must therefore be a factor in the decision to sell.
- As the president of a small firm specializing in trading illiquid over the-counter (pink-sheet) stocks once told me: "You have to feed the birdies when they are hungry."
If selling still seems difficult for investors who follow a value investment philosophy, I offer the following rhetorical questions: If you haven't bought based upon underlying value, how do you decide when to sell?
- If you are speculating in securities trading above underlying value, when do you take a profit or cut your losses?
- Do you have any guide other than "how they are acting," which is really no guide at all?
Buying: Leave Room to Average Down
The single most crucial factor in trading is developing the
appropriate reaction to price fluctuations.
One half of trading involves learning how to buy.
Evaluating your own willingness to average down can help you distinguish prospective investments from speculations.
Potential investments in companies that are
Investors must learn
to resist
- fear, the tendency to panic when prices are falling, and
- greed, the tendency to become overly enthusiastic when prices are rising.
One half of trading involves learning how to buy.
- In my view, investors should usually refrain from purchasing a "full position" (the maximum dollar commitment they intend to make) in a given security all at once. Those who fail to heed this advice may be compelled to watch a subsequent price decline helplessly, with no buying power in reserve.
- Buying a partial position leaves reserves that permit investors to "average down," lowering their average cost per share, if prices decline.
Evaluating your own willingness to average down can help you distinguish prospective investments from speculations.
- If the security you are considering is truly a good investment, not a speculation, you would certainly want to own more at lower prices.
- If, prior to purchase, you realize that you are unwilling to average down, then you probably should not make the purchase in the first place.
Potential investments in companies that are
- poorly managed,
- highly leveraged,
- in unattractive businesses, or
- beyond understanding
Stay in Touch with the Market: Opportunities and Dangers
Some investors buy and hold for the long term, stashing their
securities in the proverbial vault for years. While such a strategy may have made sense at some time in the past, it seems
misguided today. This is because the financial markets are prolific creators of investment opportunities.
Being in touch with the market does pose dangers, however.
Another hazard of proximity to the market is exposure to stockbrokers.
- Investors who are out of touch with the markets will find it difficult to be in touch with buying and selling opportunities regularly created by the markets.
- Today with so many market participants having little or no fundamental knowledge of the businesses their investments represent, opportunities to buy and sell seem to present themselves at a rapid pace.
- Given the geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainties we face in the early 1990s and are likely to continue to face in the future, why would abstaining from trading be better than periodically reviewing one's holdings?
Being in touch with the market does pose dangers, however.
- Investors can become obsessed, for example, with every market uptick and downtick and eventually succumb to short-term-oriented trading.
- There is a tendency to be swayed by recent market action, going with the herd rather than against it.
- Investors unable to resist such impulses should probably not stay in close touch with the market; they would be well advised to turn their investable assets over to a financial professionaL
Another hazard of proximity to the market is exposure to stockbrokers.
- Brokers can be a source of market information, trading ideas, and even useful investment research.
- Many, however, are in business primarily for the next trade.
- Investors may choose to listen to the advice of brokers but should certainly confirm everything that they say.
- Never base a portfolio decision solely on a broker's advice, and always feel free to say no.
The Importance of Trading: Since transacting at the right price is critical, trading is central to value-investment success.
There is nothing inherent in a security or business that alone
makes it an attractive investment.
Investment opportunity is a function of price, which is established in the marketplace.
Since transacting at the right price is critical, trading is central to value-investment success.
The best investment opportunities arise when other investors act unwisely thereby creating rewards for those who act intelligently.
Investment opportunity is a function of price, which is established in the marketplace.
- Whereas some investors are company- or concept-driven, anxious to invest in a particular industry, technology, or fad without special concern for price, a value investor is purposefully driven by price.
- A value investor does not get up in the morning knowing his or her buy and sell orders for the day; these will be determined in the context of the prevailing prices and an ongoing assessment of underlying values.
Since transacting at the right price is critical, trading is central to value-investment success.
- This does not mean that trading in and of itself is important; trading for its own sake is at best a distraction and at worst a costly digression from an intelligent and disciplined investment program.
- Investors must recognize that while over the long run investing is generally a positive sum activity, on a day-to-day basis most transactions have zero sum consequences. If a buyer receives a bargain, it is because the seller sold for too low a price. If a buyer overpays for a security, the beneficiary is the seller, who received a price greater than underlying business value.
The best investment opportunities arise when other investors act unwisely thereby creating rewards for those who act intelligently.
- When others are willing to overpay for a security, they allow value investors to sell at premium prices or sell short at overvalued levels.
- When others panic and sell at prices far below underlying business value, they create buying opportunities for value investors.
- When their actions are dictated by arbitrary rules or constraints, they will overlook outstanding opportunities or perhaps inadvertently create some for others.
Reducing Portfolio Risk
The challenge of successfully managing an investment portfolio
goes beyond making a series of good individual investment
decisions.
Portfolio management requires paying attention to the portfolio as a whole, taking into account
In effect, while individual investment decisions should take risk into account, portfolio management is a further means of risk reduction for investors.
1. Appropriate Diversification
Even relatively safe investments entail some probability, however small, of downside risk.
Diversification for its own sake is not sensible. This is the index fund mentality: if you can't beat the market, be the market.
Diversification is potentially a Trojan horse.
2. Hedging
Market risk - the risk that the overall stock market could decline - cannot be reduced through diversification but can be limited by hedging. An investor's choice among many possible hedging strategies depends on the nature of his or her underlying holdings.
A diversified portfolio of large capitalization stocks, for example, could be effectively hedged through the sale of an appropriate quantity of Standard & Poor's 500 index futures.
A portfolio of interest-rate-sensitive stocks could be hedged by selling interest rate futures or purchasing or selling appropriate interest rate options.
A gold-mining stock portfolio could be hedged against fluctuations in the price of gold by selling gold futures.
A portfolio of import- or export-sensitive stocks could be partially hedged through appropriate transactions in the foreign exchange markets.
It is not always smart to hedge.
By way of example, from mid-1988 to early 1990 the Japanese stock market rose repeatedly to record high levels. The market's valuation appeared excessive by U.S. valuation criteria, but in Japan the view that the stock market was indirectly controlled by the government and would not necessarily be constrained by underlying fundamentals was widely held.
Wall Street brokerage firms acted as intermediaries, originating these put options in Japan and selling them in private transactions to U.S. investors.' These inexpensive puts were in theory an attractive, if imprecise, hedge for any stock portfolio.
As it turned out, by mid-1990 the Japanese stock market had plunged 40 percent in value from the levels it had reached only a few months earlier.
Portfolio management requires paying attention to the portfolio as a whole, taking into account
- diversification,
- possible hedging strategies, and
- the management of portfolio cash flow.
In effect, while individual investment decisions should take risk into account, portfolio management is a further means of risk reduction for investors.
1. Appropriate Diversification
Even relatively safe investments entail some probability, however small, of downside risk.
- The deleterious effects of such improbable events can best be mitigated through prudent diversification.
- The number of securities that should be owned to reduce portfolio risk to an acceptable level is not great; as few as ten to fifteen different holdings usually suffice.
Diversification for its own sake is not sensible. This is the index fund mentality: if you can't beat the market, be the market.
- Advocates of extreme diversification - which I think of as overdiversification - live in fear of company-specific risks; their view is that if no single position is large, losses from unanticipated events cannot be great.
- My view is that an investor is better off knowing a lot about a few investments than knowing only a little about each of a great many holdings.
- One's very best ideas are likely to generate higher returns for a given level of risk than one's hundredth or thousandth best idea.
Diversification is potentially a Trojan horse.
- Junk-bond-market experts have argued vociferously that a diversified portfolio of junk bonds carries little risk. Investors who believed them substituted diversity for analysis and, what's worse, for judgment.
- The fact is that a diverse portfolio of overpriced, subordinated securities, about each of which the investor knows relatively little, is highly risky.
- Diversification of junk-bond holdings among several industries did not protect investors from a broad economic downturn or credit contraction.
- Diversification, after all, is not how many different things you own, but how different the things you do own are in the risks they entail.
2. Hedging
Market risk - the risk that the overall stock market could decline - cannot be reduced through diversification but can be limited by hedging. An investor's choice among many possible hedging strategies depends on the nature of his or her underlying holdings.
A diversified portfolio of large capitalization stocks, for example, could be effectively hedged through the sale of an appropriate quantity of Standard & Poor's 500 index futures.
- This strategy would effectively eliminate both profits and losses due to broad-based stock market fluctuations.
- If a portfolio were hedged through the sale of index futures, investment success would thereafter depend on the performance of one's holdings compared with the market as a whole.
A portfolio of interest-rate-sensitive stocks could be hedged by selling interest rate futures or purchasing or selling appropriate interest rate options.
A gold-mining stock portfolio could be hedged against fluctuations in the price of gold by selling gold futures.
A portfolio of import- or export-sensitive stocks could be partially hedged through appropriate transactions in the foreign exchange markets.
It is not always smart to hedge.
- When the available return is sufficient, for example, investors should be willing to incur risk and remain unhedged.
- Hedges can be expensive to buy and time-consuming to maintain, and overpaying for a hedge is as poor an idea as overpaying for an investment.
- When the cost is reasonable, however, a hedging strategy may allow investors to take advantage of an opportunity that otherwise would be excessively risky.
- In the best of all worlds, an investment that has valuable hedging properties may also be an attractive investment on its own merits.
By way of example, from mid-1988 to early 1990 the Japanese stock market rose repeatedly to record high levels. The market's valuation appeared excessive by U.S. valuation criteria, but in Japan the view that the stock market was indirectly controlled by the government and would not necessarily be constrained by underlying fundamentals was widely held.
- Japanese financial institutions, which had become accustomed to receiving large and growing annual inflows of funds for investment, were so confident that the market would continue to rise that they were willing to sell Japanese stock market puts (options to sell) at very low prices.
- To them sale of the puts generated immediate income; since in their view the market was almost certainly headed higher, the puts they sold would expire worthless.
- If the market should temporarily dip, they were confident that the shares being put back to them would easily be paid for out of the massive cash inflows they had come to expect.
Wall Street brokerage firms acted as intermediaries, originating these put options in Japan and selling them in private transactions to U.S. investors.' These inexpensive puts were in theory an attractive, if imprecise, hedge for any stock portfolio.
- Since the Japanese stock market was considerably overvalued compared with the U.S. market, investors in U.S. equities could hedge the risk of a decline in their domestic holdings through the purchase of Japanese stock market puts.
- These puts were much less expensive than puts on the U.S. market, while offering considerably more upside potential if the Japanese market declined to historic valuation levels.
As it turned out, by mid-1990 the Japanese stock market had plunged 40 percent in value from the levels it had reached only a few months earlier.
- Holders of Japanese stock market put options, depending on the specific terms of their contracts, earned many times their original investment.
- Ironically, these Japanese puts did not prove to be a necessary hedge; the Japanese stock market decline was not accompanied by a material drop in U.S. share prices.
- These puts were simply a good investment that might have served as a hedge under other circumstances.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)