Wednesday 3 August 2011

Intelligent Investor: Six classic investing mistakes



Nathan Bell
Done well, value investing is a successful, proven, and safe way to invest.
The logic of the approach - buying an asset for less than its underlying value - is irrefutable, and the records of those that practice it are convincing.
However, an understanding of the principles of value investing isn't enough. In investing, mistakes are inevitable, and the key is to learn from them, and avoid repeating them. Here are six of the best.
1. Focusing only on the numbers
One of the most common investing mistakes, especially for the inexperienced, is to concentrate only on a stock's financial data.
Applying a price-to-earnings ratio, a book value multiple, or a discounted cash flow analysis can provide very precise estimates of value. But that's not all there is to analysing stocks.
The big four banks, for example, all carry forecast dividend yields of about 6% to 7%, and price-to-earnings ratios of around 10 to 12. Looking at the numbers, they're closely matched.
When you consider the risks entailed by ANZ's Asian expansion and National Australia Bank's (NAB) aggressive push for market share however, suddenly the numbers don't seem to tell the whole story.
These qualitative factors are the reason we favour Commonwealth Bank and Westpac over ANZ and NAB. Before looking at the numbers, make sure you truly understand the business that's generating them.
2. Mistaking permanent declines for temporary ones
In the hunt for value, it's often necessary to buy stocks with a few fleas. When businesses hit rough patches and earnings temporarily decline, it can be a great time to buy.
This strategy led to successful 'Buy' recommendations on Cochlear at $19.04 on 18 March 2004, and Leighton Holdings at $7.83 on 11 May of the same year.
We have a positive recommendation on Aristocrat Leisure today for the same reason.
While mismanagement, a poor product line-up, the strong Aussie dollar, and cyclical headwinds are all hurting Aristocrat in the short term, we expect this business to perform well in the long run.
The risk is if its current problems aren't temporary. If Aristocrat's profits stay permanently depressed, we'll have overpaid for this business, and be guilty of having mistaken Aristocrat's structural decline for a cyclical one.
3. Buying low-quality businesses
Owning high-quality businesses over the long run is the key to successful investing.
Unfortunately, high-quality businesses are seldom cheap. Value investors therefore often end up with portfolios full of cheap but low-quality stocks, entailing greater risk, more stress, and higher stock turnover.
It's better to fill your portfolio with high-quality businesses, especially if you're patient and buy opportunistically.
4. Neglecting economic considerations
“If you spend more than 13 minutes analysing economic and market forecasts, you've wasted 10 minutes.”
Ever since uttering that sentence, legendary fund manager Peter Lynch gave value investors a free pass to ignore the economy. Or so they thought.
Lynch's advice does not mean that you can completely ignore the economy. It means that the success of your investments should never rely on specific, short-term economic forecasts.
An investment in Rio Tinto, for example, hinges largely on the continued strength of China's economy and its building and infrastructure boom. That's an economic forecast we're not willing to gamble on at current prices.
An appreciation of cycles, rather than economic predictions, should underpin your stock purchases and disposals.
5. Ignoring the market
As a value investor, a healthy scepticism of the market's wisdom is a necessity: whenever you buy something, it should be because you think the market is pricing it incorrectly.
When you're right, the rewards of ignoring the market can be enormous. The market wrote RHG Group down from $0.95 to $0.05 before our positive recommendations were vindicated.
But when you're wrong, it can be a disaster. Backing ourselves over the market explains why we were far too late in pulling the pin on Timbercorp, for example.
Share price movements should never influence your analytical process. But it is necessary to be aware of them; they can offer a timely prompt to reconsider your thinking. When you're going against the grain, make sure you know why you disagree with the market and have good reason for doing so.
6. Mistaking price and value
If you're aiming to buy stocks for less than their intrinsic value, a lower price can only mean better value, right? Wrong.
Consider Telstra, which is trading close to its lowest ever price. By that simple logic, it should be more attractive than ever. But the decline of its traditional fixed-line business means it's just not worth the high of $9.20 it hit more than a decade ago, nor the $4.80 or so it traded at in 2008.
It's tempting to anchor to previous prices but they offer no clue regarding today's value. The fact that a stock has fallen does not in itself make it cheap; only the difference between its intrinsic value and the price at which it trades does.
Avoiding these classic value investing mistakes will do wonders for your returns. Use this six-point checklist to sift out these mistakes in your own portfolio.


Friday 8 July 2011

Margin of Safety

The margin of safety

Benjamin GrahamOctober 2nd, 2008
The genius investor Warren Buffett once called it “buying one dollar for 70 cent”, the Margin of safety which was developed by the brilliant man Benjamin Graham in 1934. The precept of the margin of safety is very logic and works as follows.
Most people believe that the stock markets are rational, so that the stock-rate always reflects the actual value of a company. But that´s not true , you can prove that very easily. We you look back to the big ups and downs in times of a market crash. It´s definitely not logical that a company looses 60 % of its value and wins 120 % back in a short period of 2 years while the earnings constantly grow by 5 %. So we can conclude that the markets are irrational because sometimes the people become too afraid and sell very cheap stocks and sometimes they are just too optimistic and buy too expensive stocks. It´s not very intelligent but most people like to follow the herd.
But now, let´s get back to the margin of safety. If you know that the stock markets are irrational then why don´t make profit of it? First you look for very unpopular “cheap” stocks, the market capitalisation has to be far below the intrinsic value. That could be companies in trouble, after they reported bad news or complete industries with problems.
Now you calculate the value of the company in order to do that you can use different methods. 1. The Earning-capacity value 2. The Net asset value3. The liquidation value. So for example, if you calculated that the intrinsic value of a company has the value of 100 Million USD, but the market capitalisation just lies at 70 Million USD, you get a margin of safety of 30% or 30 Million USD. You buy this stock and when the market capitalisation achieves the intrinsic value again you sell it.
Note: The margin of safety has not to be exactly 30 percent, but the higher it is the safer is the investment.


http://www.pearl-invest.net/benjamin-graham/ben-grahams-margin-of-safety/

Saturday 2 July 2011

Time horizon and Compounding ("Give me back my Youth!"


Cashflow Quadrant of Rich Dad, Poor Dad - Robert Kiyosaki







Compounding









Asset Allocation


UP or DOWN




Price versus Value





Grow your networth.


The RATIONAL view versus the STORY view.


Buy and Hold (Return vs Risk)


Rule of 72








In less than 4 years, your initialinvestment has doubled in value!





Wednesday 29 June 2011

Hong Leong Bhd : Compelling mid-cap exposure buy


Hong Leong Bhd : Compelling mid-cap exposure buy

June 29, 2011
JUNE 29 — We maintain our BUY rating on Hong Leong Bank Bhd (HLBB), with an upgraded fair value of RM15.30/share (previously RM14.70/share). This is based on an  adjusted (for rights) ROE of 16.2 per cent for FY12F, leading to a fair P/BV of 2.4x. HLBB has now provided further details of the revenue synergies arising from the merger with EON Cap.
The first would be the potential revenue synergies from its much stronger position in credit cards. We estimate that the merged entity’s market share will jump to 13.7 per cent, from HLBB’s current 8.2 per cent. Secondly, HLBB envisages better forex and treasury fees arising from a larger SME customer base. HLBB’s total loans from SMEs currently make up about 9 per cent of its overall total loan base, but this will rise to 14 per cent of the merged entity’s overall loans.
The other revenue synergies that have been identified are related to cross-selling and other opportunities to fill selected market gaps in terms of branch network. HLBB also intends to raise transactional and payments systems fees over a larger customer base, as well as expand its priority banking services platform.
Besides adding earnings for EON Cap, our forecasts are now adjusted for three main items. Even with these adjustments, we derive an adjusted ROE of 16.2 per cent FY12F. We believe HLBB is now positioned as a compelling mid-cap banking stock, with a meaningful exposure to China.
Key catalysts for HLBB are: (a) stronger-than-expected top line growth; (b) sustained asset quality, (c) better-than-expected contribution from Bank of Chengdu, and (c) a seamless integration of its merger with EON Cap.
* These recommendations are solely the opinion of the respective research firms and not endorsed by The Malaysian Insider. The Malaysian Insider shall not be liable for any loss arising from any investment based on any recommendation, forecast or other information contained here.