Thursday 24 November 2011

Calculating Risk/Reward Ratios

Calculating Risk/Reward Ratios

Risk to reward ratios. If there is a cornerstone to any trading philosophy, it starts at the risk to reward table. Although identifying good risk/reward trades does not guarantee success, not identifying good risk/reward trades almost always guarantees failure. Let's explore yet another important subject in the life of a trader and look at a trade setup we took late Friday in the context of this subject matter.

Determining a Good Risk/Reward Trade

Contrary to popular thought, successful traders can take on any type of trade in terms of size and risk as long as they first understand the implications of the trade and are willing to stomach the losses should they occur. If a trader feels that they have the hot hand, they may choose to press a bet (to make a larger than normal purchase or sell on the belief that the odds are in their favor). They do this knowing that they may suffer greater than normal losses if the trade doesn't pan out. Traders do this all the time.

It is critical, if you are to be successful, to understand that trading is a game of probabilities. Technical traders are simply looking for patterns with a greater than 50/50 chance of repeating themselves over and over again. Once such patterns are identified, traders attempt to recognize such patterns in current charts and then identifying entry and exit points based on those charts. Entry and exit points are typically associated with support and resistance areas of the charts. Ah, support and resistance areas. These were the tools of the early traders, traders that read the tape ... traders that were successful at technical analysis long before the advent of all these derivative indicators, these answers to the problem of technical trading, this onslaught of technical wizardry. The oldest and purest form of technical analysis is support and resistance. Understanding it provides a large portion of the technical analysis that one needs to be successful at identifying entry and exit points.

Calculating the Risk/Reward Trade

In previous chapters we have talked about the need to identify potential trades based on chart patterns. The idea is that you collect a set of candidate charts, charts that have positive prospects for immediate or reasonably near term trading time frames. It is with these candidate charts that one can dig deeper into the possibility of trading that particular issue. The identification of a probable trade centers around the proper identification of realistic entry and exit positions based primarily on support and resistance. Once you have properly identified the support and resistance points you can take those numbers, plug them into a simple spreadsheet and calculate the risk reward. The simplest form of calculation involves nothing more than the following:

Entry Price
Stop Loss Target
Stop Profit Target
The resulting Risk/Reward Ratio

Now, let's apply this to a particular trade. The following graph shows NEM as it looked on May 17th, 2002. Gold is enjoying a significant run up and this trade actually goes against the prevailing trend, attempting to time a quick short trade based on chart patterns. On the fundamental side, there is concern that gold could continue to rise as the dollar continues to weaken and as world events dictate increased fear on the terrorism front. On the other side of the coin, the technical picture shows a potential short candidate given the annotations provided below.

View image here.

Given the chart above, here's an example of the most simplistic risk/reward ratio calculation.
In the end, it turns out that world events and the spot price of gold ended up making this trade a losing trade, but risk to reward calculation remains the same ... regardless if the trade wins or loses.

Ranking Trades and the Spreadsheet

To see if a potential play is worth wagering money on, one must determine what the potential losses are if your analysis is wrong, and what the potential gains are if the analysis is correct. You should always shoot for a minimum of 2:1 ratio, that means that your potential profit should be roughly 2 times your potential loss. This is a rule of thumb that many traders use ... especially the good ones. In the example above, if one enters a trade at the price of $29.12 with a define stop loss exit of $30.68 and a potential target exit for profits at $26, then the ratio is roughly 2:1 (a bit less in this case). That's it. It's really that simple.

Recognize that once one has entered such a formula into a spreadsheet and begins using it, one can easily play with the numbers to make them work. For example, let's say that NEM looks like a great short right now, but that the exit is really $31, not $30.68. Now, one could stretch the target to $25 even though the support lies at $26 in order to justify the trade, but the trader inside you knows this is not the case. When setting support and resistance points, one has to realize that if the numbers are fudged, the person fudging the numbers is the one hurt. It's their money that's on the line.

An easy way around the temptation of making the numbers work, is to always look at the support and resistance points first and allow as much slack in the numbers as makes sense. Now, plug in the entry price. Does the risk/reward make sense? If it doesn't change the entry price, not the stop or target prices. Jiggle the entry price to the point where it makes sense and then simply wait until you get that entry point or pass the trade up. There are always more fish in the pond.

Once a number of potential trades are identified, the next step is to take a position in the trade. It is important to realize that no trade is a certainty as they are all probability based. The likelihood of success and failure can be quantified to some degree based on certain risk factors. By quantifying the risk factors and ranking the potential trades based on these risk factors, one can take a systematic approach to trading ... an approach that can pay huge dividends. This is a laborious process that takes time and organization. The simplest way to organize this is via a spreadsheet. Since spreadsheets can contain simple arithmetic equations, you can easily build equations to compute the risk factors described below. When first experimenting with trade rankings, one should error on the side of simplicity as having too many factors is no better than having any at all.

So how can you begin to construct a ranking system that allows you to increase your reward and reduce your risk? It's not so much difficult as it is tiring. Looking back, you must first screen a large number of stocks and then flip through a large number of charts looking for technical patterns that have potential. The primary technical indicators you are interested in are those that have the highest percentage of success. Edwards and Magee go to great lengths to point out all types of technical trading patterns in their bible of technical trading, Technical Analysis of Stock Trends . The obvious factor when ranking trades is to balance the risk versus the reward with the idea that the higher the reward relative risk to the risk, the higher the probability over time that you will make money. The simplest way to calculate the risk to reward ratio, is to pick an entry price for a given stock and then ask yourself, where would you have to consider exiting the stock if it turns out that you are wrong on the trade. For the reward, you ask yourself the same question but the exit is associated with your having a winning trade. Based on how many shares you intend to trade, you can calculate the amount you will loose and the amount you will win. Don't forget to add in your transaction costs as part of this.

This is the fundamental basis of all ranking systems. From there, you can begin to add other variables such as, how long do you expect to be in the trade. The shorter the period of time relative to the risk/reward, the more money you can make over time (assuming you win more than you lose). As your refine your ranking system you will find that stocks with higher betas are naturally more susceptible to short trading periods given their volatility.

Another key variable is a confidence factor. The confidence factor itself if typically based on several factors such as the probability that the technical picture is favourable, the probability of the market contributing to your individual stocks success. Regardless of the factors you experiment with, it is important that you keep your data available for study over time so that you can continue to refine your system. Without constant scrutiny, your ranking system can loose it's value overtime as the markets are dynamic and always changing.


Embellishing the Formula

Once one has mastered the use of the simplest formula for risk/reward, one can consider embellishing the formula to include other criteria. For example, if one could reasonably judge the amount of time it takes a trade to play out, then that knowledge could be incorporated into the spreadsheet in order to rank the trades on a more favourable basis. Think about it. There is only so much capital to use when trading. Using that capital on the highest potential return over some period of time is the desire.

Another key element of gaining the highest potential return on ones money is to associate a confidence factor into the equation based on the stock, the technical pattern being traded, whether the trade is in the direction of short, intermediate and long term trends, etc. Again, there are a number of factors that can be added to the formula to rank the trades and use that ranking as a basis for decision making. The desire is to remove some of the gut feeling that goes into trading with a more logical and less emotional process.

Analyzing the Results

Another advantage of plugging numbers into a spreadsheet s that one than then have a historical accounting of trades taken be they successful or not. Keeping ones historical data allows later analysis of that data in order to improve ones performance in the future.

For example, examining historical data to determine where the largest losses were and then deciding if they were because of failed stop exits could provide fruitful insight to changing trading behaviours. The same is true for wins.

Another exercise would be to look over the charts a month after the trade and examine other data points for exits (both success and fail exits). In doing this, one could speculate on what if scenarios such as, "What if I had maintained the position longer. Would it had continued to perform or would it have turned into a bust?". The imagination can run wild with such scenarios and if you are like most, the amount of time available to ones research is limited to the minimum analysis of old trade data, but there is value in it. It has been said that if mankind doesn't understand the mistakes of the past then we are doomed to repeat those mistakes in the future. Dwelling on the past is not the issue, but learning from it does have benefit. The game of trading is a lonely game. In today's world it is, for the most part, a game of solitaire where individuals from all walks of life stare endlessly at flickering screens while moving piles of money around. One has to show the motivation to sharpen their game as no one else will. As we all know, if one is not on top of your game, at least in this game, one doesn't last long.


Summary

Always calculate your risk to reward ratio prior to making a trade. Refuse potential trades unless the risk to reward ratio is 1:2, that is for every dollar risk, there is a potential for two dollars in return. By calculating your risk to reward for every trade you will ignore marginal trades and you will identify your exit points before taking a trade. Recognize that you want to understand your exit criteria ... at the beginning of the trade, not sometime later. Once you are comfortable with simple risk to reward measurements and are identifying support and resistance zones reasonably accurately, you can consider increasing the complexity of your formula to consider other variables such as time and confidence. Lastly, keep your data points and analyze your successes and failures over time in order to hone your trading strategy.


Article written by Technical Analysis Today - www.tatoday.com


http://www.otrader.com.au/stock_and_option_trading_articles/risk_to_reward_ratios.asp

Money management rules for stock trading


Money management rules for stock trading

Money management rules are an obvious part of every good stock trading strategy.

These rules should answer these questions:


These money management rules will help you to identify how many shares you can buy or sell short in a particular trade.

How big is my risk for one trade ?

The definition of maximal risk value for one trade could vary a little bit. Generally, the numbers used are between 0.5% to 2% of the total account size.
Example:
The account size is $100,000 USD. The maximum risk per trade is 1%. It means that you can risk $1000 USD on every trade. If distance between your entry and stop-loss level is $1 USD, then you know that you can open trade with 1000 shares. Simply calculated by (absolute risk)/ (point of distance between entry and stop-loss level).
Should you open trade with 1000 shares? No! You must check other money management rules and combine the results.

My stock market trading tip:
If you are a beginner in trading, start with a small risk. Use 0.4% or 0.5% risk of the total account value. And as your confidence grows and your trading journal reports your success, increase it.



How many opened trades I can have at a time ?

It isn’t easy to manage trades by moving stop or taking profits manually if you have a lot of trades and only two hands! You must be able to manage trades manually in case of any strong move on the stock markets. Even if your trades are not day trades but you are swing trading on stock markets, it can happen. So every trader must limit the maximum number of opened trades. The absolute maximum for a single person is eight open trades at once. Don’t surpass this hard limit.
Five or six open trades at once as a maximum is an appropriate limit for every trader.
Example:
Your swing stock trading account size is $100,000 USD. You decided to have max. five open trades at once. Your broker provides you with a 2:1 overnight margin. That means you can use $40,000 USD for one trade. How was it calculated? 100,000 x 2/5 = $40,000. So when you plan to buy XYZ stock with a stock price of $20 USD, this rule tells you that you can buy max. 2000 shares. Combine it with the number of shares from the previous rule and use the LOWER value for your trade setup.

Special stock market trading tip:
During the first years of your trading set this number of trades to the lower value (like 3 or 4 max.)



What is my risk: reward ratio ?

Never, ever try to have the risk reward ratio less then 2.5 to 1. This rule is crucial in your trading statistics, especially if you’re new to trading and without any relevant trade history, so set this ratio to 3:1.


Other relevant issues

There are also other important rules, which are part of a stock trading strategy.
Trade only liquid stocks. stocks have an average daily trading volumeover 300,000 shares traded per day (for swing trading stock) or above 1,000,000 shares per day (for online day trading).
Trade stocks with a price above $5 USD. Stocks with a low price aren’t traded by big institutional traders and therefore are easily manipulated. Technical analysis can fail on such stocks. Also, most big investment funds don’t invest in such low-priced stocks.

Another of my tips on stock market trading:
All money management rules can be easily defined in spreadsheet (like Excel or OpenOffice Calc) and then all values are calculated automatically as you are entering your setup entry , stop-loss and targets .
Here is example of a spreadsheet table:
money management spreadsheet example



http://www.simple-stock-trading.com/moneymanagement.html


Risk reward ratio


Risk reward ratio

Risk reward ratio is a very important definition. Every trader must have this value set in his stock trading strategy This simple formula is a little stock trading secret. It helps you to move trading probabilities in your favor.
The profit value for every trade setup must be at least three times bigger than the risk value. 

Simply put, if you expect to make a profit of $3 USD per share in a trade, you have to risk $1 USD per share as maximum.
This trading secret looks easy, but a lot of traders break this rule, and then their trading results are bad.
When you trade only trades with the potential profit of $3 or more times bigger than the taken risk, your result will be stock trading with regular monthly income.
Later, as you develop a longer history of your real trades, you’ll be able to make small modifications of this ratio to value that best fit your trading strategy. Your trading journal or trade accounting software will provide you enough reports to do it.
It’s an easy to check if your trade setup fits with your risk/reward ratio. Simply use a spreadsheet with formulas.
Example how to use spreadsheet for your risk/reward ratio calculation is described on money management page.

My special stock market trading tip

Don’t be afraid to reject a trade setup even you like it very much.
There are plenty of other trade opportunities. You can find good stock picks on the stock market every day

Check this ratio during trade development

I have described above how to use risk reward ratio when you prepare stock trading setup for your stock trading strategy. But it is not last time you use these formulas.
You have to use this ratio also during trade management process. As you have trade already opened, you have to manage it accordingly. It means that you must trail stop loss level based on your trailing stop rules and also you must take profits.
Risk reward ratio is used when you think about new trailing stop level. It is always good to have this ratio better then 1:1 as your trade is developing and you want to trail stop.
As your trade is closer and closer to your expected target, trail stop to have risk smaller then possible profit. Always check this ratio when you do regular trade analysis during your daily trading and analysis routine.

Know your Risk: The Risk-Reward Ratio

Know your Risk: The Risk-Reward Ratio

Risk is a part of trading. Every trade carries a certain level of risk. Every trader must know the amount of risk that is being assumed on each trade. Knowing the amount of risk on each trade is one way to limit it and to protect your trading account. The best way to know your risk is to determine the risk-reward ratio. It is one of the most effective risk management tools used in trading.

The risk-reward ratio is a parameter that helps a trader to determine the level of risk in a trade. It shows how much a trader is risking versus the potential reward (or profit) on a trade. While this may seem simplistic, many traders neglect taking this step and often find that their losses are very large.


How to Determine the Risk-Reward Ratio?

The first step is to determine the amount of risk. This can be determined by the amount of money needed to enter the trade. The cost of the currency multiplied times the number of lots will help the trader to know how much money is actually at risk in the trade. The first number in the ratio is the amount of risk in the trade.

The reward is the gain in the currency price that the trader is hoping to earn from the currency price movement. This gain multiplied times the number of lots traded is the potential reward. The second number in the ratio is the potential reward (or profit) of the trade.

Examples

Here are a few examples of the risk-reward ratio:

If the risk is $200 and the reward is $400, then the risk-reward ratio is 200:400 or 1:2.
If the risk is $500 and the reward it $1,500, then the risk-reward ratio is 500:1500 or 1:3.
If the risk is $1,000 and the reward is $500, then the risk-reward ratio is 1000:500 or 2:1.

What is a Good Risk-Reward Ratio?

The minimum risk-reward ratio for a Forex trade is 1:2. However, a larger ratio is better. An acceptable risk-reward ratio for beginning traders is 1:3. Any number below 1:3 is too risky so the trade should be avoided. Never enter a trade in which the risk-reward ratio is 1:1 or the risk outweighs the reward.

Many experienced trader will only enter trades in which the risk-reward ratio is 1:5 or higher. This requires that the trader wait for a trade with this ratio, but the reward is worth it. A higher risk-reward ratio is a good idea in case the currency does not make the anticipated price movement. However, if the trader uses a lower risk-reward ratio, there is very little room for smaller price movements and the amount of risk will increase.

The risk-reward ratio is an important risk management and trading tool. It is important for beginning traders to take the extra time to perform this task because it can help to minimize risk in every trade. Waiting for the right risk-reward ratio can take a long time. However, the benefits of waiting for a higher risk-reward ratio are worth the effort and patience. You will know your risk and know your potential profit. Most importantly, you will know whether the trade is worthy of your money.


The Risk-Reward Ratio
By John Russell, About.com Guide
http://forextrading.about.com/od/basicforexrisks/a/riskreward_ro.htm

Risk/Reward Ratio


Risk/Reward Ratio


What Does It Mean?
What Does Risk/Reward Ratio Mean?
A ratio used by many investors to compare the expected returns of an investment to the amount of risk undertaken to capture these returns. This ratio is calculated mathematically by dividing the amount of profit the trader expects to have made when the position is closed (i.e. the reward) by the amount he or she stands to lose if price moves in the unexpected direction (i.e. the risk).
Investopedia Says
Investopedia explains Risk/Reward Ratio
Let's say a trader purchases 100 shares of XYZ Company at $20 and places a stop-loss order at $15 to ensure that her losses will not exceed $500. Let's also assume that this trader believes that the price of XYZ will reach $30 in the next few months. In this case, the trader is willing to risk $5 per share to make an expected return of $10 per share after closing her position. Since the trader stands to make double the amount that she has risked, she would be said to have a 2:1 risk/reward ratio on that particular trade. The optimal risk/reward ratio differs widely among trading strategies. Some trial and error is usually required to determine which ratio is best for a given trading strategy.



 http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/riskrewardratio.asp#ixzz1eaycfwSK

Wednesday 23 November 2011

There are four ways to protect yourself from the current economic turmoil.

Paying for a cult of risk
Anneli Knight
November 23, 2011


Occupy
Money extremes … governments need to create policies to avert further financial woe. Photo: Reuters
There are four ways to protect yourself from the current economic turmoil.

The former derivatives trader who in 2006 predicted the global credit crisis, Satyajit Das, says the world economy will continue to deteriorate unless international policymakers co-operate. Either way, he says, we're heading for dramatic change and offers a few tips on how to weather the storm.

In his book Extreme Money: The Masters of the Universe and the Cult of Risk, Das has coined the term ''extreme money'' to refer to the ''process of financialisation'' that has underpinned the banking sector and global economics throughout the past 40 years.

''Money was always a medium of exchange, a store of value but, essentially, what happened in the last 40 years is that it changed … and became the driver of economies,'' he says.

Das says this process made borrowing a key driver of growth. ''You end up with this situation of pure speculation as a way of making money - we like to call it investment.''

His book chronicles the recent history of banking and the way it has shifted from a simple era - in which banks existed to borrow and lend sensible amounts, offer convenient and safe payment mechanisms such as credit cards and help manage risk with products such as insurance - up to the current state of chaos.

''Extreme Money spans this period and tries to turn out every little piece, which on its own looks fine, but when you add them all up it's this horrific tale of how we deluded ourselves for over 30 or 40 years.''

Das says governments are in denial about the huge co-operative effort required to avoid turmoil. ''We've been trying to defy financial gravity; the question is: do we come down in a gentle control glide or do we just crash?''

Proactive and aggressive policies taken by global leaders are required to cushion the landing, Das says, acknowledging the inherent challenge in garnering international agreement on policies that will bring pain.

''There's huge denial because if people want to confront this they'll have to unravel a lot of things they've put in place over the last 30 years, which would mean lower living standards, which, in my view, is inevitable anyway.''

Regardless of the approach world leaders take, Das says, individuals can begin to take steps now to cushion their own financial circumstances.

TAKE CHARGE

Taking the time to understand your investments is crucial, Das says. ''You're the only person who can make a decision about what you're comfortable with,'' he says. ''We've just delegated that to other people - funds managers, advisers - and generally, on average, they've not done a great job. There's also a conflict of interest because that person will always think their product is the best, naturally, even if it's not best for you.

''People have just walked away from trying to understand this, which is crazy because it's a very important part of your life. You have to understand this because otherwise you'll pay for this and you'll pay for this with your hard-earned cash.''

REDUCE DEBT

Das forecasts borrowing costs may increase and it will be more difficult to secure a loan as the debt problems in Europe spread to the US and Japan and make it more difficult for Australian banks to lend from overseas. In a time of higher risk, higher cost and less availability of funds, you should reduce your debt, Das says. ''Essentially, reducing your debt means cutting your mortgage, or, if you have a business, reduce the debt as quickly as possible.''

SAVE MORE

''We're entering a period of lower returns, which means we need to save more,'' Das says.

''Individuals are going to need a lot more savings than they imagined because what Australians have relied on are two things: the value of their houses, which is a complete illusion because your house is not an investment, it is where you live. And the other savings are superannuation but the problem is your retirement savings are not earning enough to give you a reasonable lifestyle at retirement. Retirement savings earnings are pretty abysmal and they're not going to go up - if anything they're going to be lower.''

As the global economy changes to a more realistic situation, Das says the Australian government will be forced to pull back funding for services such as education, health and aged care.

''You are going to need more of your personal resources to pay for all these things than you imagined because governments can't afford to pay.''

SEEK CAPITAL SECURITY

With a forecast of low growth and high risk, Das says investors should seek secure investments with a focus on income rather than capital gain.

''You really need to get investments which provide you with income you can live on,'' he says. ''If you have money to invest, make sure the money you have is protected. That will be very important.''

Key points

Satyajit Das recommends four ways to protect yourself:
❏ Take charge of your own finances.
❏ Reduce your debt.
❏ Save more.
❏ Be concerned with capital security and income rather than capital gain.


Satyajit Das's book Extreme Money: The Masters of the Universe and the Cult of Risk is published by Portfolio (Penguin, $32.95).


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/money/planning/paying-for-a-cult-of-risk-20111122-1nrfd.html#ixzz1eXknG4Ce



Tortoise always wins in super race

Tortoise always wins in super race
Chris Becker
November 23, 2011 - 12:01PM


 Long road ahead ... the full effects of an increase in the Super Guarantee will not be felt for a generation.
Retirement may come sooner than your super fund's recovery. Photo: ThinkStock
We all bemoan the state of our super when we open our statements each year particularly given the rolling ongoing crises that beset the share market. Yet the common wisdom is to always look to the long term and eschew focusing on the short-term gyrations.
You've probably heard that to fund your retirement, your super fund should return inflation plus three per cent. To achieve this, you've been told to allocate nearly three quarters of your retirement savings into growth assets, mainly shares, or you will miss out on their growth and have your savings eroded by inflation.
The reality is most super funds cannot achieve this performance nor capture the upside potential - "they're dreaming" - as Darryl Kerrigan once put it.
According to SuperRatings, the average return for the 50 largest "balanced" super funds over the last five years is 1 per cent per year. Over a 10-year period it averages 5.1 per cent per year. Across all types of super funds (except self managed), returns have averaged 3.3 per cent per year - or just 0.3 per cent above inflation. Dreaming indeed. The problem is further compounded because the averages hide the inevitable volatility that comes with "investing" in growth assets.
In your writer's previous report, Time to rethink your super,  (also available here as "Tackle Risk for Super Returns"), we looked at a different technique to overcome the dual problem of underperformance and volatility - the barbell portfolio.
First, your super is for saving, not speculating, and should mainly comprise solid investments like bonds, term deposits and annuities. Secondly, you should still have exposure to growth assets, but you must consider the risk before the potential return as the long term implications are devastating to your retirement savings.


The tortoise and the hare
Here's the reason why the downside matters more than the upside. Imagine two portfolios - the tortoise and the hare. The hare is your typical "balanced" fund, with over 70 per cent assets in shares and property, the rest in cash and fixed interest. Over a thirty-year period, the hare will experience some "fast" years, earning well over 10 per cent, and occasionally will fall into a puddle, earning nothing or losing a few per cent.
Not so often, by not looking where he is going, he falls into a deep hole, losing 20-40 per cent of the portfolio. He climbs out and sets off again. The Tortoise takes a different path, avoiding the holes and puddles, plodding along, always earning between 4 and 8 per cent year in, year out. But “on average” the hare should win, right?
The reality is the hare hasn't understood time and opportunity cost. To get back to even after a 20 per cent loss - a common occurrence in the last 4 years - requires a 25 per cent positive return. Even if he has successive 10 per cent returns each year, it will take him 8 years in a row to catch up to the hare earning a positive 6 per cent year in, year out. And that's without falling into any more puddles or holes.


Compare the funds
So let's compare some real world performance. Assume a starting balance of $100,000 in 2001 in a balanced and a barbell portfolio, where the latter has a 90/10 weighting of “investment” and “speculative” assets. The former will comprise a third cash, two thirds bonds, the latter only an Australian share index fund.
The real potential behind the barbell portfolio is twofold. First, it outperforms the balanced fund by 23 per cent, by averaging a little more than the required 6 per cent a year (3 per cent plus inflation). More importantly, it smoothes the returns by limiting the downside volatility, with a maximum drawdown of 2 per cent, compared to almost 13 per cent for the balanced fund (remember this is an average over a 12 month period.
In reality, the typical balance fund dropped over 20 per cent in value during the GFC. Not a good time to retire.)
This absolute return allows peace of mind for retirees and avoids the “hare” problem for accumulators. How to do it
The basic barbell portfolio described above can be easily constructed with the required investment options available within the most popular retail and industry super funds.
Remember the allocation, the vast majority of your fund should be in secure "investment" assets with almost zero potential for drawdown or loss of capital. Most funds have a "cash" option and a "bonds" or "fixed interest" option available. Consider a bias to the latter, e.g up to 60 per cent in bonds, as the top 25 diversified fixed-interest funds have returned at least 5 per cent per annum over the last 10 years. Some funds will even have a "term deposit" option, which could return as much as 6 per cent per annum.
The speculative side of the barbell - no more than 10 per cent - would be best allocated to Australian shares only. I would not consider international shares, due to the structural inability of fund managers to provide even a positive return over a 10-year period. A small amount in property or infrastructure - even up to 5 per cent - could be considered due to the income stream, but remember these assets are extremely risky and illiquid.
Don't forget security - the bar that binds the two together. In a non-DIY fund, the best security asset is life and disability insurance where the costs are usually much cheaper due to the group discounts within the fund.


Conclusion
Relying on market volatility and traditional asset allocation to provide the return in your super has been shown as unreliable even in the biggest bull market in history.
Regardless of market conditions, either blue skies or impending doom, you need constant positive or “absolute” returns to both build and protect your precious retirement savings.



Chris Becker writes as The Prince at MacroBusiness. He is a full-time equities trader as well as a partner in Empire Investing, a private value investing company. The full MacroBusiness "The tortoise route to riches" report is available free at MacroBusiness, as is the "Tackle risk for super returns" report.


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/tortoise-always-wins-in-super-race-20111123-1ntod.html#ixzz1eXhAAUP1

KL Kepong

KL Kepong 4Q net profit up 48% to RM460m, FY RM1.57b
Written by Joseph Chin of theedgemalaysia.com
Wednesday, 23 November 2011 17:25


KUALA LUMPUR (Nov 23): KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BHD [] (KLK) reported a 48% increase in earnings to RM460.61 million in the fourth quarter ended Sept 30, 2011 from RM311.04 million, boosted by the PLANTATION []s sector and disposal of an associate, Esterol.

It said on Wednesday its revenue increased by 48.9% to RM2.999 billion from RM2.014 billion while its earnings per share were 43.25 sen compared with 29.21 sen. It declared an interim dividend of 70 sen per share versus 45 sen.

“The group's pre-tax profit increased 38.3% to RM599.2 million. The current quarter's result was boosted by the non-recurring surplus of RM200.6 million arising from the disposal of an associate, Esterol, whilst last year's quarter had a writeback of RM76.0 million on the allowance for diminution in value of investment,” it said.

KLK said the plantations sector recorded a 27.7% improvement in profit to RM447.5 million due to better selling prices of commodities and increase in fresh fruit bunches production despite higher production cost and FRS 139's fair value loss of RM27.1 million.

However, the manufacturing sector's performance was adversely impacted by the uncertainties and concerns over the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and global macroeconomic environment which had eroded customers' buying confidence and disrupted the supply and demand pattern.

This sector reported a loss of RM49.3 million (4QFY2010: profit RM26.1 million) with substantial stocks write-down as a result of falling prices and FRS 139's fair value loss of RM33.9 million.

For the financial year ended Sept 30, its earnings jumped 55.2% to RM1.571 billion from RM1.021 billion while its revenue reported a 43.4% increase to RM10.743 billion from RM7.490 billion.

KLK said the Group's pre-tax profit for the financial year at RM2.066 billion had surpassed the preceding year's profit by 49.4%.

The increase in profit was due to a 41.9% surge in plantations profit to RM1.596 billion, driven by strong selling prices of commodities which had over-shadowed the impact of higher production cost.

KLK said the manufacturing sector reported a 40.1% increase in profit to RM201.9 million despite the loss suffered in the fourth quarter.

“The results for the year had benefited from added capacities coming on-stream as well as relatively strong business environment in the earlier part of the year,” it said

It also said retailing profit fell 33.6% to RM18.4 million due to narrower margins and increase in operating cost.

The disposals of two associates, Esterol and Barry Callebaut Malaysia Sdn Bhd (BCM), had generated a total surplus of RM244.0 million.

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/business-news/196680-flash-kl-kepong-4q-net-profit-up-48-to-rm460m-fy-rm157b.html


----

Saturday November 19, 2011

KLK plans downstream and upstream expansion



PETALING JAYA: KL Kepong Bhd (KLK) planned to expand its downstream and upstream business segments for its palm oil businesses amidst sustained palm oil prices above RM3,000.

The company which derives 80% of its net profits from upstream business planned to increase its landbank for oil palm estates from 250,000 ha to 300,000 ha in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, South America and Africa.

“In the upstream we are a price taker. We also don't want to be too dependent on our upstream that's why when prices drop we have our downstream business and our property division which will help us to sustain any downturn in commodity prices,” said chief executive officer Tan Sri Lee Oi Hian yesterday.

KLK is also planning to build another palm oil mill in Indonesia which would cost about RM120mil in three years in addition to the three mills being built there presently.

“The three new palm oil mills in Indonesia are under construction to meet the growing fresh fruit bunches production from fast maturing areas,” group plantations director Roy K. C. Lim told a media briefing here yesterday.

The refineries in Indonesia have passed the plannnig stage and were about to commence consruction.

KLK had upgraded its two palm oil mills in the country, increasing the capacity in one of the mills.

In the oleochemicals business segment, KLK planned to expand its alcohol plant in Westport, Port Klang which was recently moved from Singapore to Malaysia.

“We have a gearing ratio which is very low with essentially good cashflows and this would give us space to fund our expansion,” Lee said.

“So far fundamentals look good, despite the economic problems in Europe.

Most people are still quite friendly towards palm oil so let's hope that the situation would be able to stay this way. It is a very good basis to believe palm oil prices would stay above RM3,000,” Lee said.

The company's CPO yields per mature ha had dropped in its latest 3QFY2011 to 3.4 tonnes per ha from 4.7 tonnes per ha in FY2010 ended Sept 30, 2010.

However, costs of producing FFB had been on a rising trend since FY2007 to RM200 per tonne in its 3QFY2011.

The company said that it expected to reduce this figure by increasing productivity and efficiency of its manpower.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/11/19/business/9934512&sec=business

----

Published: Friday November 18, 2011 MYT 2:23:00 PM

KLK plans expansion for plantation business


KUALA LUMPUR: Amidst sustained palm oil prices above the RM3,000 level, Kuala Lumpur Kepong Bhd is planning expansion in both its downstream and upstream plantation businesses.

The company said today that it aims to increase its landbank for plantations from 250,000 hectares to 300,000 hectares in countries not limited to Indonesia only.

It also plans to build another palm oil mill in Indonesia, in addition to the three that are already under construction there presently.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/11/18/business/20111118143630&sec=business

----

KLK

Market Watch
Recent Financial Results

Announcement
Date   Financial
Yr. End   Qtr   Period End   Revenue
RM '000   Profit/Lost
RM'000   EPS   Amended
23-Nov-11      30-Sep-11      4   30-Sep-11      2,999,658      475,870      43.25       -
16-Aug-11      30-Sep-11      3   30-Jun-11      2,952,257      455,391      40.64       -
25-May-11      30-Sep-11      2   31-Mar-11      2,368,357      396,818      35.10       -
23-Feb-11      30-Sep-11      1   31-Dec-10      2,422,980      317,452      28.56       -


ttm-EPS 147.55 sen
Price $21.38
Trailing PE 14.5x







----
Batu Kawan

Market Watch
Recent Financial Results

Announcement
Date   Financial
Yr. End   Qtr   Period End   Revenue
RM '000   Profit/Lost
RM'000   EPS   Amended
23-Nov-11      30-Sep-11      4   30-Sep-11      74,253      239,804      56.44       -
16-Aug-11      30-Sep-11      3   30-Jun-11      72,941      212,262      50.33       -
25-May-11      30-Sep-11      2   31-Mar-11      69,776      186,717      44.12       -
23-Feb-11      30-Sep-11      1   31-Dec-10      66,170      148,540      35.41       -

ttm-EPS  186.3 sen
Price $16.20
Trailing PE 8.7 x



----



2445.kl KLK
1899.kl Batu Kawan
Comparing share price appreciation of KLK and Batu Kawan