Sunday 5 February 2012

Market Timing - If you absolutely must play the horses

Though Benjamin Graham in no way recommend trying it, he did say that there is a way to combine market timing and value investing principles.

However, Graham noted, the method makes heavy demands on human fortitude, and it can keep an investor out of long stretches of a booming market*.  It sounds simple.  Yet for those who realize how difficult it is to follow, this strategy can diminish the risk of trading on market movements.

Here is the way it works:

1.  Select a diversified list of common stocks (for example, buying undervalued stocks).
2.  Determine a normal value for each stock (choose the PE ratio that seems appropriate).
3.  Buy the stocks when shares can be bought at a substantial discount - say, two-thirds of what the investor has established as normal value.  As an alternative to buying at one target price, the investor can start buying as the stock declines, beginning at 80 percent of normal value.
4.  *Sell the stocks when the price has risen substantially above normal value - say 20 percent to 50 percent higher.

The investor thus would buy in a market decline and sell in a rising market.


Comment:
*When you buy wonderful companies at fair prices, you often do not need to sell.  You may consider selling some or all when the stock prices are obviously very overvalued.  In these situations, the upside gains are limited and the downside losses are high.  These will impair the total returns of your portfolio.  However, even in such overvalued situations, you should only consider selling when the prices have risen very substantially above their normal values, for example, >> 50% over their normal values.  Also, remember to reinvest the money back into other wonderful companies at fair prices that offer a higher reward/risk ratio and that promise returns commensurate with your investment objective.

Buying Time

When the market hits its low, true value investors feel that harvest time has arrived.

"The most beneficial time to be a value investor is when the market is falling," says institutional manager Seth Klarman.  There are plenty of companies ripe for the picking.

In the summer of 1973, when the stock market had plunged 20 percent in value in less than 2 months, Warren Buffett told a friend, "You know, some days I get up and I want to tap dance."

Unfortunately, this is the time when investors are feeling most beat up by the markets.  Fear and negative thinking prevail, and anyone who has faced down a bear knows how paralyzing fear can be.  This, at the depths of a bear market, is the time to buy as many stocks as are affordable.

Value bargains aren't found in strong market.  A good rule is to examine stock markets that have reacted adversely for a year or so.

Undervalued stocks quite often lie dormant for months - many months - on end.  The only way to anticipate and catch the surge is to identify the undervalued situation, then take a position, and wait.

Benjamin Graham: "Buying a neglected and therefore undervalued issue for profit generally proves a protracted and patience-trying experience."

Signs at the Bottom

The bottom - or near enough the bottom - of a market cycle theoretically should be easier to call than the top or near top.

The evidence is found in the corporate balance sheets, income statements, P/E ratios, dividend yields, and other quantitative measures.  It is likewise reflected in low ratios for the market as a whole.  The quantitative factors speak for themselves.

The dividend yield on the Dow Jones Industrial Average, for example, usually cycles between a high yield of 6 percent at the market's bottom and a low yield of 3 percent at the top.   The Dow's average dividend yield sometimes stretches beyond these boundaries, but historically this is a trustworthy parameter of undervalue and overvalue.

Patience - a fundamental investment discipline to have a lot of.

There is only one strategy that works for value investors when the market is high - PATIENCE.

The investor can do one of two things, both of which requires steady nerves:
1.  Sell all stocks in a portfolio, take profits, and wait for the market to decline.

  • At that time, many good values will present themselves.
  • This may sound easy, but it pains many investors to sell a stock when its price is still rising.

2.  Stick with those stocks in the portfolio that have long-term potential.

  • Sell only those that are clearly overvalued, and once more wait for the market to decline.
  • At this time, value stocks may be appreciating at slow pace compared with the frisky growth stocks, but not always.


But come the correction, be it sudden or slow, the well-chosen value stocks have a better chance of holding their price.

As for the hot stocks, when they take a hard hit the investor is cornered.  If the stock is sold, the loss becomes permanent.  The lost money cannot grow.  If the investor hangs on to the deflated stock, the long trail back to the original purchase price will deeply erode the overall returns.


Comments:


When you buy wonderful companies at fair or bargain prices, you can often hold these forever.  The earnings power of these companies ensure that your returns will be positive over the long term.  You often do not need to sell, even if these companies are slightly overvalued as their intrinsic values in the future will probably be higher than the present prices.  When the share prices of these wonderful companies go down in tandem with the market corrections or bear markets, you often have the chance to buy more at lower prices.  The only action you should avoid is to buy these wonderful companies when they are trading at obviously overvalued high prices.  A wonderful company can be a bad investment when you buy it at a high price.


Saturday 4 February 2012

Will the great interest rate gamble pay off?

Will the great interest rate gamble pay off?
By flooding the system with 'free’ money, the central banks could be storing up trouble.

Since arriving at the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi has engineered a sort of Club Med putsch, sidelining the German hawks and embarking on monetary activism - Will the great interest rate gamble pay off?
Since arriving at the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi has engineered a sort of Club Med putsch, sidelining the German hawks and embarking on monetary activism Photo: REUTERS
Bravo, Mario Draghi, the European Central Bank’s new president. Everyone assumed that this mild-mannered Italian would be so determined to prove himself to his Bundesbank masters that he’d be even more German than the Germans in pursuit of the principles of sound money. The profligate Italian of caricature would become the hair-shirted German, lashed to the mast of the Bundesbank’s anti-inflationary tradition.
In practice, he’s proved anything but. Since arriving at the ECB, Draghi’s engineered a sort of Club Med putsch, sidelining the German hawks and embarking on the kind of unconventional monetary activism that for several years now has been the hallmark of the US Federal Reserve and Bank of England. He’s been bold, and he’s been decisive.
And it appears to have worked. In promising unlimited funding to Europe’s stricken banks, he’s very likely saved the Continent from the Lehman’s moment for which it was undoubtedly heading. Both Spain and Italy have also found it easier to fund themselves in financial markets, and spreads have narrowed. Banks have been encouraged to borrow cheaply from the ECB to buy higher-yielding government bonds – the “Sarkozy carry trade” – which in turn has allowed countries to finance themselves less expensively.
By the time this month’s auction is over, the ECB will have doled out nearly one and a half trillion euros of “free” money to help keep the banking system alive, with much more to come over the months ahead.
Nobody is under any illusions. These actions have not succeeded in vanquishing the crisis. Underlying structural issues remain unresolved, and it is most unlikely that the starvation diet to which much of the eurozone periphery has been condemned will result in robust recovery. But Mr Draghi has at least prevented the patient from dying on the slab. Two cheers for that.
Even so, you have to wonder where all this “financial repression” – the artificial depression of interest rates – is going to lead. Since the crisis began, the world’s major central banks have engaged in a degree of intervention in financial markets quite without precedent in the modern age, if ever. In seeking salvation from the banking maelstrom, interest rates have been cut close to zero, and long-term bond yields suppressed to historic lows.
In Britain, the Bank of England has already bought up more than a third of the conventional gilts market, or rather more than a quarter of the entire national debt. Since quantitative easing began, the Bank has hoovered up gilts to the value of more than a half of those issued by the Debt Management Office, greatly easing its task in financing the deficit.
Nor is this the limit of the UK’s financial repression. Banks have been required by regulators greatly to increase their liquidity buffers, creating another big source of demand for UK gilts. It’s the same in the US and Europe.
These sovereign debt holdings have created new threats. Given the inflated size of the buffers, it would require only a quite small rise in interest rates – one or two percentage points – to create additional solvency problems for the banks, as we saw with the Franco-Belgian bank Dexia, which had to seek a bail-out after its eurozone sovereign debt turned toxic. Yet it is the rapid expansion of central bank balance sheets which is beginning to cause greater concern.
There are a number of justifications for this expansion. One is that by printing money, the central bank counters the contraction in credit being caused by private and banking sector deleveraging. By so doing, the monetary authority keeps the deflationary bogey at bay.
But it also allows governments to issue debt at lower interest rates, reducing servicing costs and eroding the real value of the debt. Economists have described it as a form of stealth taxation, or debasement.
It’s not an ideal way of proceeding, and it’s deeply unfair on savers, who through negative real interest rates are obliged in effect to subsidise both the Government and other debtors. It is, however, generally considered less painful than the alternative of even greater fiscal austerity.
For the moment, it’s hard to argue that such actions are inflationary. Today’s relatively elevated levels of UK inflation are not directly caused by money-printing, but by devaluation and the spike in energy prices. The problem is not too much money, but not enough. Yet intuitively, one knows that some way down the line, such practices will have inflationary consequences which, once out of the box, will be extremely hard for central banks to put back in again.
Only last week, the US Federal Reserve committed itself to keeping interest rates close to zero for another three years. By the time we get there, the US will have had seven years of essentially “free” money. Nobody knows what the long-term consequences of such financial repression might be. As I say, it’s never been tried before. But we do know from the way unduly loose monetary policy helped stoke the credit bubble in the first place that the potential for things to go very badly wrong is high. Central banks frequently seem to do more harm than good.
In the US, credit conditions already seem to be easing. Recent evidence points to sustainable growth of some 2 to 3 per cent. As the economy normalises, so must interest rates. The fear must be that we’ve grown so used to and reliant on ultra-low rates that the economy won’t be able to tolerate anything else. The dangers are all too obvious.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9057320/Will-the-great-interest-rate-gamble-pay-off.html

Imperial Tobaccco is cash generating machine

Questor share tip: Imperial Tobaccco is cash generating machine


A general sense of slight disappointment pervaded this week's trading update from Imperial Tobacco – but again, things aren't as bad as some fear.

Imperial Tobacco
£23.08 +5p
Questor says BUY
Imperial Tobacco Group
Obviously, investing in tobacco shares is not to everyone's taste – but through good times and bad they continue to make money for shareholders.
A study this week released by BNY Mellon Wealth Management and Janney Montgomery Scott showed that the MSCI World Tobacco Index had the highest return out of 67 groupings in the MSCI World Index in the 10 years to 2011. The sector was the best place to put your money in the equity markets for the past 10 years.
Imperial said that it expected to meet full-year consensus expectations. However, volumes were hit by sanctions on Syria and a price war in Spain – a significant market for Imperial.
This meant the group's overall cigarette volumes fell by 7pc and net tobacco revenue slid 1pc.
However, Imperial is focusing on key emerging markets – and the pricing environment is positive.
"Combined stick equivalent volumes of our key strategic brands were up 3pc and net revenues up 10pc with our focus on driving growth in these brands in emerging markets and fine-cut tobacco in the EU," said Alison Cooper, Imperial chief executive.
Key global strategic brands include Davidoff, Gauloises Blondes, JPS and West. Luxury Cuban cigars were also a bright spot, with volumes rising 14pc.
The outlook for the rest of the year is positive. Volume declines should ease throughout the year and comparisons get easier.
Imperial's £500m share buyback is well on track, with £320m shares purchased between May and December. The company also confirmed its commitment to grow the dividend ahead of earnings per share.
By historical standards the shares are looking cheap, trading on a September 2011 earnings multiple of 11.2, falling to 10.3 next year. The prospective yield is 4.6pc, rising to 5.1pc, which is attractive for income-seekers.
Imperial has changed its dividend policy to increase the payout ratio to 50pc of adjusted earnings, instead of 47pc.
The shares were last recommended as a buy at £21.03 a share on September 22 last year. They are up 10pc since then, compared with a market up 15pc.
The sector should continue to generate significant amounts of cash to pay dividends and invest in its key brands.
The shares remain a buy for income-seekers.

Finally, You Can Prevent — And Even Reverse — Heart Disease

Finally, You Can Prevent — And
Even Reverse — Heart Disease . . .

FREE video reveals the very same strategies heart expert
Dr. Chauncey Crandall uses with his own patients —
many of whom now live without the fear of heart disease
or dependence on expensive, side effect-laden drugs.

Britons rush for Australian visas

The threat of changes to the Australian visa application process has led to a surge in applications by Britons to move Down Under, according to a migration agency

A view of Sydney bridge and opera house
Changes to Australia's visa system could make it harder to obtain permanent residency Photo: Peter Scholey / Alamy
VisaFirst.com is using Australia Day (January 26) to launch a campaign raising awareness of the changes, urging prospective migrants to act now or risk missing out.
The latest changes, which come into effect on July 1 this year, are set to lengthen the application process and make it harder to obtain permanent residence.
Nearly 24,000 UK citizens were granted permanent resident visas for Australia in 2011, despite a toughening of the “points system” in July of that year. The prospect of further changes has already sparked a rise in applications from would-be emigrants, claims VisaFirst.com, which registered a three-fold increase in applications in January alone.
“Currently, if you meet the points requirement you can lodge your visa application,” said Edwina Shanahan, director of the company. “After July 1, applicants will have to achieve the pass mark and will then be entered into a skills pool. Australian immigration authorities will then decide which applications they want to invite for further processing from the pool. Applicants can languish here for up to two years, with no guarantee of ever receiving an invitation to apply.”
She urged would-be migrants to act quickly even if they do not plan to move soon, adding: “Once the visa is granted, applicants have a five-year window to relocate, so it's worth submitting the application now, even if you're not planning the move just yet.”
Under the new system, applicants over 32 years of age or with limited work experience are most at risk of disappointment, due to scoring less points, but families in the "middle road" category shouldn't be complacent, warned Shanahan. “The immigration process is going to be a lot more selective, based on those who score the highest number of points. The Australian government will also be setting quotas on the number of skilled workers from each sector – carpenters, for example – in the pool at any one time,” she said.
Skills in demand vary from state to state, but nursing, engineering, trades and construction are among the most sought-after.
For would-be emigrants, Australia offers a better quality of life and higher living standards but the cost of housing in the major cities can be high, while the strength of the Australian dollar against the pound sterling affects the spending power of migrants who rely on sterling income or savings.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/offshorefinance/9036643/Britons-rush-for-Australian-visas.html

The Most Hated Company on Earth Is Making Investors Rich


I can't think of a stock that's more hated.

I've written about this company several times before. I've personally owned it for years. But just about every time I mention it, I end up receiving nasty emails admonishing the fact that I would cover... let alone recommend... investors own shares of this company.

In fact, it happens so often that I instruct our staff to put in a mention that this investment isn't for everyone whenever they cover it. If you don't want to invest in this stock, I can certainly understand. But if you have an open mind toward this black sheep, you're likely to appreciate what it can do for you.

Simply take a look at its performance so far in 2011...

In a year marked by credit downgrades, the European debt crisis, and stagnating growth, the most hated company on the planet -- Philip Morris International (NYSE: PM) -- is still making investors rich. And that comes when the broader market has been a roller coaster ride.

In fact, Philip Morris stock is within pennies of its 52-week high hit earlier this month.
Unfortunately, I've noticed that more and more investors seem to be tricked into thinking investing has to be complicated. But stocks like Philip Morris prove that making money doesn't have to be hard.

Philip Morris doesn't have a complicated business model. It is simply one of the most dominant and shareholder-friendly companies on the planet. The company does business in 180 countries and owns 7 of the world's top 15 global brands in its market. 

But it has also made a mission of rewarding its shareholders. In the last three years alone, it has returned more than $12 billion in dividends while increasing the payments per share by 43%. Today, the shares pay a yield of more than 4%.
Then there are the buybacks. Since May 2008 the company has repurchased more than $20 billion in stock -- or nearly 20% of the outstanding shares.

All of these moves simply make the stock more valuable, even if earnings don't rise a cent. And as you can see, that's showing up in the share price as well.

I must admit, I'm a bit biased though. I personally own Philip Morris and also selected it as one of my 10 Best Stocks to Hold Forever.

Of course, with investing there's never a surefire thing. There's no quality a company can possess that will guarantee its success.

But when you can find companies like Philip Morris that dominate their market and are returning billions to investors, these are the sort of stocks that can still deliver strong returns in nearly any market -- including this one.

http://globaldividends.com/newsletter.asp?d=5797&utm_source=outbrain&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=do-ob-1011

Meet the Isa millionaires



Dozens of people have created huge pots of money by the simple act of investing in individual savings accounts.


Ivan McKay with his cattle herd
Image 1 of 2
Ivan McKay has managed to accrue an Isa pot of £1.6m  


Ignore your tax-free Isa allowance at your peril – you could be missing out on a million-pound fortune. Savers who have religiously salted away their full annual Pep and Isa allowance over the past 25 years have amassed a tidy fortune; there are dozens of Isa millionaires across the country.
Brewin Dolphin, the private client investment manager, boasts nine Isa millionaires among its clients. Their investments have a combined value of £15.5m, with the highest having a combined Pep and Isa pot of £4.4m.
Charlotte Black of Brewin Dolphin said its Isa millionaires invested in individual shares, rather than funds – with many stocks at the smaller end of the FTSE scale.
Ms Black admitted that many of the shares that had made sizeable gains would have been off the average investor's radar – and too risky. But she added that everyone with spare cash should maximise their Isa allowance, which this tax year is £10,680.
"Isas and Peps [personal equity plans, Isas' predecessors] have been such a valuable savings medium over the past 25 years and we advise clients never to miss a chance to use them, either alone or as a tax-free zone within their portfolio. Our millionaires have each adopted a more risky investment strategy and it is exciting to see how that has paid off for some."

So just how easy is it to become an Isa millionaire?

It may sound a long shot but Killik & Co, the stockbroker, which has around 16 Isa millionaires among its clients, reckons that modest growth of 5pc a year and the small matter of a 25-year horizon will do the trick for a couple pooling their Isa allowances. "Assuming a 5pc rate of growth a year, this could be worth £1.074m, or £1.686m assuming 8pc growth," said a spokesman.
John Cotter of Barclays Stockbrokers (which also has 16 millionaires) said: "Some have achieved Isa millionaire status by having a lot of eggs in just a few baskets – a risky strategy. Some have backed their judgment in one or two companies and their strategies have paid off; again, risky. They have also recognised the importance of reinvestment of the dividends."

The savvy investors

Not surprisingly, few Isa millionaires want to put their head above the parapet and, like many National Lottery winners, they shun publicity. But fortunately there are a couple of savvy investors who are happy to share their Isa joy.
One such couple, John Housden and his wife, Judith, from Kent, have accrued a combined pot of £1.3m having invested around £190,000 each since the first year of Peps in 1988. It pays them a handsome income of £57,000 a year. Mr Housden kicked off his portfolio with £3,000 worth of Midland Bank shares. He has added to his holding in the company (which was taken over by HSBC in 1992) since and his stake is worth around £40,000 today.
It has not all been plain sailing for the Housdens. Among the winners there have been some losers – notably, he says, Woolworths, Yell and Jarvis. But he rates his decision to buy Rolls-Royce shares as, perhaps, his smartest move. Mr Housden, who does his own research, bought £3,500 of the shares when they were worth 147p – they are now priced at 738p.
A top tip for all would-be Isa millionaires is to be patient, even when you are gripped by fear as share prices plummet amid rumours of stock market Armageddon.
"As a rule I don't worry about fluctuations in capital value as I tend to think of the Isas as a source of retirement income," said Mr Housden. "Just as well really, because the value now (£1.34m) is much the same as in June 2007, although in March 2009 it had fallen to just £760,000."
Ivan McKay, a sheep farmer and Daily Telegraph reader from Northern Ireland, has amassed a Pep and Isa pot worth £1.6m. He uses two brokers, Barclays Stockbrokers and Walker Crips Weddle Beck. Mr McKay said he had never forgotten the advice his local accountant gave him when he was about to invest in his first Pep. "He said to me, 'be your own man'.
"If I read a paper with a star-studded share panel, I won't follow their tip if I think the price is high," said Mr McKay. "I have often been proved right."
Mr McKay said he had had two "outstanding" buys and his top secret to investors was "to take profits" along the way.
For example, he bought Babcock International when its share price was just 53p but has taken profits as it continued its climb (it is now priced at 740p). He also bought Scottish & Southern Energy in 1989 at 240p (the shares now stand at £12.35) and this year it is paying a dividend of 80p – that's a return of 33pc in itself, he says proudly.
Mr McKay added: "I'm a livestock farmer so I work long 16-hour days when the weather is dry, but can catch up on my reading about shares when it's been raining – and it has been raining a lot recently."
His most recent purchase is XP Power, the power components company, which he bought at 925p, having watched its price slide from a high of £19 since the start of the year. The price has since ticked up to 983p.
"My school never put me forward for exams so I went back to the plough when I left. But I always believed I was as clever as those who went on to university," Mr McKay said.
Another Isa millionaire is a 71-year-old reader from the Midlands who wished to remain anonymous. The former stockbroker, who uses Redmayne Bentley, said he followed the cliched mantra of "run with your profits and cut your losses". He is also not afraid to go "liquid" if he feels the market is a little choppy. He has done this only twice, before the dotcom bust of the late Nineties and just before the credit crunch got into full swing in 2008.
"You should only ever sell a share when it is overvalued, not because it has gone up by 100pc," he said.
One of his oldest holdings remains in his portfolio today. The company, FW Thorpe, a family-run business that provides lighting to the public sector, has seen its share price rise from around 100p in 2000 to 837p today. "It's a fascinating company that has always had a Thorpe at the helm," he said.
And his latest purchase? "This week I have bought Imperial Tobacco for the first time. It looks undervalued to me, has an attractive yield and is unlikely to go bust."