Thursday 3 May 2012

Buffettology: Value Investing Strategy


Buffettology: Warren Buffett Quotes & Value Investment Strategy for Stock Picks


warren buffettWhile it may be tempting to throw yourself into the dramatic highs and lows of investing in the stock market in search of instant gratification, it’s not necessarily the most profitable choice. Warren Buffet has spent his career watching investors pounce on “hot” companies, only to flounder when the market takes a plunge. All the while, he’s been steadily accumulating wealth by taking an entirely different approach.
You may be thinking, “OK, the guy’s successful, why should I care?” Well, in 2008, Warren Buffett was the richest man in the world with an estimated worth of over 62 billion dollars. This kind of wealth is not a result of sheer luck. He’s gained his enormous fortune using a very specific investment strategy, developed on a basis of long term investing. The great news is that, by learning a little about the way Warren Buffett thinks, you too can enjoy greater success in the stock market.
So what exactly is Warren Buffett’s investment strategy and how can you emulate him? Read on and find out.

Secrets to Investing Success

Since Warren Buffett has never personally penned an investment book for the masses, how does one go about learning his secrets? Luckily, many of his letters to shareholders, books that compile such letters, and insights from those close to him are readily available to the public.
There’s a lot to be gained from his quotes alone. Here are a few sayings that have been attributed to him.

Warren Buffett Quotes on Investing

  • “Most people get interested in stocks when everyone else is. The time to get interested is when no one else is. You can’t buy what is popular and do well.”
  • “Only buy something that you’d be perfectly happy to hold if the market shut down for 10 years.”
  • “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.”
  • “Investors making purchases in an overheated market need to recognize that it may often take an extended period for the value of even an outstanding company to catch up with the price they paid.”
  • “If a business does well, the stock eventually follows.”
  • “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”
  • “Time is the friend of the wonderful company, the enemy of the mediocre.”
Clearly, Warren Buffet is a value investor. He looks for great companies, or “wonderful” ones as he puts it. He is not looking at hot sectors or stocks that may shoot up now, only to cool and fall later. He wants an efficient running business that has favorable long-term prospects.
Additionally, although he wants great stocks, he does not want to pay a premium price. Warren uses a specific calculation to arrive at a fair valuation, then waits until a market correction or crash puts those prices on his doorstep.
Now that you know a little about his basic investing philosophy, let’s take a more in-depth look at how he makes investment choices.

Buffettology and Stock Selection

The book, Buffettology, is a fantastic resource, primarily written by Warren Buffett’s former daughter-in-law, Mary Buffett. The co-author, David Clark, is a long-time friend of the Buffett family. Since these authors probably have some special insight into how Warren Buffet privately analyzes stocks, it’s worth hearing what they have to say. Here are a few of the major points they focus on:

Best Stock Industries

The authors of Buffettology recommend looking for promising companies in 3 broad categories:
1. Consumables
Buffett’s choice businesses include those that make products which are consumed or quickly wear out such as:
  • Snacks
  • Pop
  • Gum
  • Toothpaste
  • Pens
  • Razor blades
Why? Because higher product turnover implies more revenue for the company. If you can also find a leading name brand that people gravitate towards, you have a good starting point.
2. Communications
Another major category of companies that Warren likes is communications. Advertising agencies are a major part of this group as they expand into new platforms like cell phones and tablet computers, in addition to the old standbys of TV, radio, and newspapers.
This is an area where you will need to be careful because what is new today can be discarded as waste tomorrow. Be aware that advertising may go down with the economy as businesses prune costs during tough times. Also, as people turn from print to web, some forms of advertising will increase at the expense of others.
3. Boring Services
The last category is for repetitive and boring services. A few examples of these highly profitable companies doing the same job over and over might be:
  • Lawn care companies
  • Janitorial services
  • Basic tax filing services
“Boring” itself is not enough to warrant an investment. However, if something is both boring and essential, there’s a good chance it’s a stable, efficient, easy-to-operate business that will have a long-lasting life.

What Characteristics in a Company to Look For

Once you know where to look, it’s important to know who you should turn your attention to. The book cites the following factors for determining which companies to watch closely.
1. Existence and Value
Warren Buffett analyzes considerable historical financial data on a stock. In general, this would exclude new companies where only a few years of financial data exist. He picks stocks based on their intrinsic value and the ability of the company to continually increase that value, often wanting a minimum of 15% annually over many years. This kind of regular increase can be considered a High Annual Rate of Return.
2. Market EdgeThis includes companies that have a monopoly, where no other alternative exists. Think of a toll-bridge as one example. Other market edges could include companies that sell a unique product. Buffett is not as keen on commodity-based companies where the price is set by the market, competition is stiff, and the company has no ability to freely adjust for inflation.
3. Finances
Warren looks for these financial traits in companies:
  • Increasing Earnings. It is especially important that a large amount of this money is being retained and used for further growth. Sitting on a big pile of cash, or giving earnings back as dividends, is not viewed as desirable since extra tax may need to be paid on dividends, and the burden of re-investing is placed on the shareholder.
  • Reasonable Financing. The financing for the company should be reasonable, without a high debt-load.
  • Simple Business Model. The company model should be simple with few moving parts, and not a lot of money needed to maintain the business model. It should be a lean, mean, and profitable operation.
But when you find such a wonderful company, how will you know if it is a good buy? For that we need to learn how to value a stock the Buffett way.

Valuing a Company Buffett-style

Buffettology also outlines a few different methods to determine the value of a stock and whether or not it is a good buy. Two of the most popular methods revolve around “Earnings Yield” and “Future Price Based on Past Growth.”

1. Earnings Yield

The concept behind this is elementary and rooted firmly in the price-to-earnings ratio, or more correctly, the opposite, which is called the earnings yield. When you divide the annual earnings by the current share price, you find your rate of return. Therefore, the lower the stock price is in relation to its earnings, the higher the earnings yield. Here are three examples for comparison:
  • Aeropostale Inc. (NYSE: ARO) has a share price of around $25 and an annual earnings of $2.59. If you divide $2.59 by $25 you get the earnings yield of 10.36%.
  • Hansen Natural Corporation (NASDAQ:HANS) has a share price of $56 and an annual earnings per share of $2.39 and only 4.2% of the share price is annual earnings.
  • McDonald’s is trading at a $75 with annual earnings of  $4.62 per share, which gives us an earnings yield 6.2%.
Warren would use this formula to compare similar stocks with steady earnings to see which would provide a higher earnings yield based on share price. Based on these examples, Aeropostale has the most attractive earnings yield.
Keep in mind, this is only to be used as a very quick and crude method of comparing similar stocks, or to compare yields to bond rates. As you will see in the next two valuation methods, the earnings yield is far from accurate in giving us a long-term growth rate.

2. Future Price Based on Past Growth

For this, Buffett would analyze the long-term growth trend to determine how it might perform over the next 10 years. Depending on the company and the industry, it may make sense to use any of a variety of metrics, including both the PE ratio and the Enterprise Value/Revenue multiple.
Let’s use the PE ratio to illustrate how this strategy works. To guess what growth might be like over the next 10 years, you first need to determine what the average earnings growth rate has been on the stock over the past 5 to 10 years.
I will use McDonald’s as an example. They are a big name brand, they aggressively opened up in new markets, and McDonald’s provides a consumable product that has a loyal following. Let’s say the EPS growth over the past 5 years averages 17.6%. Using an EPS of$4.62 EPS in year 0, and a growth rate of 17.6% per year, will yield the following 10-year forecast:
  • Year 0, EPS: 4.62
  • Year 1, EPS: 5.43
  • Year 2, EPS: 6.39
  • Year 3, EPS: 7.51
  • Year 4, EPS: 8.84
  • Year 5, EPS: 10.39
  • Year 6, EPS: 12.22
  • Year 7, EPS: 14.37
  • Year 8, EPS: 16.90
  • Year 9, EPS: 19.88
  • Year 10, EPS: 23.37
Now you have an estimated total earnings per share by the end of year 10. Today, the EPS is $4.62 and in a decade that should appreciate to $23.37.
Now, you must determine what this means for the share price. To do this, you simply look to a long-term average of P/E, or the price-to-earnings ratio. The 5 year P/E average in this example is 17.7. Multiply this by the future expected earnings rate of $23.37, and you get an estimated price of $413.65.
If the price right now is $75, what is the rate of return over the next 10 years?
You can simply use an online rate-of-return calculator to calculate annual profits of 18.62%. Remember, this is a basic estimate that doesn’t include dividends, which can boost your yield by 3% every year, or almost 22% when using capital gains and dividend yield together. Moreover, it is based on the assumption that the PE ratio will remain constant, which is unlikely, but still serves as a good example
For those of you who find all of this a little overwhelming, that doesn’t mean that Buffett-style investing isn’t for you. There is a simpler option.

Berkshire Hathaway

If you want to utilize his strategies without actually having to learn them, you can buy shares in Warren Buffett’s company. He is the Chairman and CEO of the publicly owned investment managing company, Berkshire Hathaway. Take advantage of his success by choosing from the following:
  • Class A Shares with a current sticker price of $127,630 each.
  • Class B Shares which currently sell for $85.04 each.
As you can probably tell from the price discrepancy, it takes 1,500 Class B shares to have equivalent ownership of one Class A share. They are similar except that Class A shares have proportionally more voting rights per dollar of worth.
How have the shares of Berkshire Hathaway performed over the past 46 years? The cumulative gain is 490,409% which works out to an average of 20.2% per year. This is an average annual 10.8% excess of the market as tracked by the S&P 500 index (including dividends). If in 1965, you invested a whopping $1,900 with Warren Buffett, this would be worth $9,545,300 by the end of 2010.

Effects Of Success

With those numbers, you may be wondering why anyone would choose to attempt Warren’s strategy on their own. Unfortunately, this kind of incredible growth is becoming harder for Berkshire Hathaway to attain. When a company has hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, achieving significant growth is far more difficult.
Buying up smaller companies did not impact Warren Buffett’s Berkshire’s financials as much as when his company was smaller. He has become an elephant stomping around the market in search of increasingly elusive good buys.

Final Word

The simplest way to invest Warren Buffet style is to buy shares of Berkshire Hathaway and forget about them for the next 10 or 20 years. But, as his company has reached astronomical heights, this strategy has become less and less valuable.
Thus, many people who love the “Warren Buffett investing style” choose to invest on their own. If you are excited by due diligence, scanning thousands of stocks for that highly profitable (and oftentimes mundane) business, forecasting company earnings, and monitoring the company’s progress, then the “Warren Buffett investment method” may be a perfect fit for you. Remember, perhaps above all else, to have guts of steel when the market drops so that you can buy undervalued and profitable stocks.
What are your thoughts on Warren Buffett and his investing style? Do you try to replicate his strategies and success? Share your experiences in the comments below.


http://www.moneycrashers.com/buffettology-warren-buffet-quotes-investment-strategy-stock-picks/

Tuesday 1 May 2012

You should seek companies that can create the equivalent market value for each $1 of retained earnings, for the shareholders

Guinness Anchor

Year    DPS   EPS

2001    27.4    19.4
2002    27.4    24.0
2003    28.1    25.8
2004    30.4    32.6
2005    30.1    35.7
2006    30.2    42.4
2007     32.9   37.3
2008     36.4   41.7
2009     41.0   47.0
2010     45.0   50.5
Total    328.9  356.4

From the year 2001 to 2010
Total dividend paid out  328.9 sen
Total earnings 356.4 sen
Total retained earnings  27.5 sen



Price Range of each Guinness Share
2001  Low $ 2.75 -  High $ 3.58
2010  Low $ 6.60 -  High $ 10.16

Subtracting the highest price of 2001 from the lowest price of 2010, the gain in the share price of Guinness from 2001 to 2010 was $3.02  ($6.60 - $3.58 = $3.02 )

The change market price of Guinness from 2001 to 2010 was a minimum of $3.02.

Therefore, for every $1.00 of retained earnings, Guinness has created at least $3.02/ $0.275 = $10.98 in market value, that is, for every 10 sen retained earnings, Guinness has created a market value of a minimum of $1.098.



How does the company use the retained earnings?  Do the retained earnings reflect in the stock price?


When the management of a company invests earnings back into the business, that investment should yield a higher return because of those retained earnings.  When the management does a great job using retained earnings, it will increase the earnings of that company, and , in turn, earnings per share will increase.

Market price does not always reflect the true value of the company during the short term.  But, if you are looking at 10 years or more, market price reflects the true value of the company.

In the above example, using Guinness, the last 10 years of EPS were added and compared with the market price of the stock in those years.

Warren Buffett teaches that you should seek out those companies that can grow at least the equivalent $1.00 of market value for each $1.00 of retained earnings.  To not do so, the company is destroying value.

The Individual Investor Advantage


This weekend, as I was driving back from picking up groceries, I was listening to a financial radio talk show. I wasn’t particularly impressed with the host to start with, but then he offered some advice that was so horrible it nearly caused me to veer off the road and into a ditch. He suggested that a caller not invest in stocks, because when you buy a stock, someone smarter than you is the person who is selling it.

Instead, he suggested only investing in mutual funds. Keep in mind; he’s a financial adviser who specializes in mutual funds, so we know where his bias is.

After a few minutes more of listening to the program, I had to turn it off in favor of my daughter’s insipid Kidz Bop CDs. Anyone who followed the host’s advice might as well just flush their money down the toilet.

Here’s why.

Most mutual funds underperform the market. In 2011, 84% of stock mutual funds did not beat the broad market or their benchmark index (if a fund is focused on a particular sector like technology or a region like Europe, it will have a different index that it’s expected to beat other than the S&P 500).Last year was a particularly bad one for mutual fund managers. Normally, the results aren’t quite as dismal. Over the past 10 years, 57% of funds underperformed their benchmark.

To make the radio host’s argument even more laughable, he said those “smart” traders on the other side of the stock trades included many mutual fund managers who did this for a living.

So you should be scared of buying stock from people who are bad at their jobs? Forget that. Where do I sign up to buy from them?

The weak performance of mutual funds doesn’t mean you should avoid all mutual funds. They’re appropriate for investors who don’t like to pick their own stocks and don’t want to put much effort into their portfolio other than asset allocation. But be sure you don’t chase a hot mutual fund because it posted strong performance numbers or has a popular manager.

Instead, invest in index funds with low expense ratios. If you’re investing in index funds, you’re basically just trying to match the market averages. There’s nothing wrong with that. The market goes up over the long haul and if you’re matching the market’s performance, you’ll make money.

If you’re investing in mutual funds, consider the funds in Alexander Green’s Gone Fishin’ Portfolio. These are funds like the Vanguard Emerging Markets Index Fund (VEIEX). The fund has a very low 0.33% expense ratio and has returned an average of 13.11% per year over the past 10 years.The key to the funds in The Gone Fishin’ Portfolio are the very low fees. Many actively managed funds have significantly higher costs — usually at least 1%, and sometimes much more. That means each year 1% or more of your money is going to the mutual fund company to pay for salaries, toner and Christmas parties. That money is better off in your pocket and the lower fees will improve your returns over the years.

This doesn’t mean that there are no quality mutual funds or managers who will generate solid returns for you — but with six out of 10 fund managers underperforming the market every year, are you really good enough to pick the right one every year? I’m not. That’s why most of my mutual fund holdings are in the funds recommended in The Gone Fishin’ Portfolio — inexpensive funds that are designed to simply match the market returns.

But I don’t put all of my money in those funds. I pick stocks, too. And I’ll match wits with those fund managers any day of the week. It’s not that I’m so smart and they’re so dumb. But as an individual investor, I have opportunities that they don’t.

Individual investor advantagesFor example, a stock I like that’s currently in The Oxford Club’s Perpetual Income Portfolio is Community Bank System (NYSE: CBU). It’s a small bank located in upstate New York and Pennsylvania. It has a market cap of just over $1 billion and trades an average of 244,000 shares a day.

I like it because it never took a dime of TARP money, pays a 3.6% dividend yield (4.7% based on our entry price in September) and has raised the dividend every year for 19 years.With just 244,000 shares traded per day, a large mutual fund would have difficulty buying large blocks of stock without moving the share price significantly. As an individual investor, you would have no problem picking up a few thousand shares on any given day.

Also, as an individual investor, you don’t have to worry about marketing. You’re not trying to impress anyone with which stocks you own or trying hard to beat a benchmark. However, a mutual fund, particularly one that isn’t outperforming, better have some of the hottest stocks in its portfolio at the end of the quarter, when its portfolio is revealed, otherwise, as Ricky Ricardo used to say, they’ll have some “’splainin’ to do.”Additionally, they’ll get rid of their dogs. The fund companies don’t want investors pulling their money (which reduces fees collected) because investors think the fund managers are asleep on the job. But buying hot stocks and dumping beaten up ones is usually the wrong thing to do.

If the fund manager has done his homework and likes a stock because of its prospects and/or value, selling it because it sold off and is cheap isn’t going to help investors in the long run. He should be buying. And similarly, if a stock is hot and is a momentum trade, buying it after it is popular is also misguided, as it may be difficult to sell so many shares from a big fund when the music stops.

Individual investors have more flexibility than the big guys. You don’t have to publish quarterly reports that will be scrutinized and you can get in and out of stocks whenever you want, without fear of moving the price. You can also switch your strategy at any given time.

If you decide small caps look more attractive than large caps, you can move some of your assets between the two groups, whereas a large cap fund manager is stuck in large caps, no matter how the group is performing.

Even if you’re an investor who doesn’t want to actively manage your money, don’t be lazy and hand it over to a mutual fund manager who will likely not do as good a job as you or a passive index fund will. Pick some great stocks that you expect to hold for the long term, or buy the funds mentioned in The Gone Fishin’ Portfolio. You’ll save a ton of money in fees and likely do a better job than the fund managers do. It would be hard to do worse.

Marc Lichtenfeld is the Senior Analyst at InvestmentU.com

http://www.investmentu.com/investment-experts/marc-lichtenfeld.html

Warrant poser, cash settlement calculation unfair say some


Monday April 30, 2012

By TEE LIN SAY 

linsay@thestar.com.my


PETALING JAYA: The calculation of cash settlement for call warrants has come under the spotlight as some investors argue that the current method is unfair.
They argue that the calculation of cash settlement for call warrants should not be determined based on the average closing price of the last five days, but instead be based on the volume weighted average price of the last five days.
Currently under Bursa Malaysia's listing requirements, issuers of structured warrants are able to determine for themselves the calculation of cash settlement based on three options:
(i) The volume weighted average price; or
(ii) The average closing price; or
(iii) The closing price of the underlying share or exchange-traded fund on the market day immediately before the exercise or expiry date.
However, most issuers presently use the average closing price as the method to determine cash settlement. Some dealers feel that this may be unfair because if the closing price of the mother share gets depressed on the last five days, then the cash settlement figure drops. “This has happened in a few instances, so it raises the question of whether a more dynamic price determination ought to be considered,” said one dealer.
He cited examples of Malaysia Building Society Bhd's (MBSB) call warrants which expired on April 18 and the DRB-Hicom-CH which expired on April 26.
“For the last five days where the price of the mother share was being used to determine the cash settlement, the price of MBSB's mother share was depressed at the close of four out of the five days,” said the dealer.
MBSB-CA expired at 5pm on April 18. Looking at the intraday charts of MBSB on April 11, 12, 13, 16, and 17, the share prices closed at the low of its day for April 11, 12, 16 and 17. The share prices started dropping towards 4.30pm.
For example on April 17, MBSB opened at RM2.19 and reached an intraday high of RM2.25. By 4.30pm, however, the share price had started dropping and it eventually closed (at 5pm) at RM2.17.
Basically, the higher the mother share, the higher the cash settlement for the warrant holder.
The exercise ratio was 3 MBSB-CA for every one MBSB mother share at an exercise price of RM1.48.
MBSB's closing price of RM2.18 was the average of the closing prices for the shares on each of the five market days immediately before the expiry date.
In the case of DRB-Hicom-CH, it expired on April 26. On the last five days of its closing before expiry, which were April 20, 23, 24, 25 and 26, its share price also dipped lower from the RM2.60-RM2.68 range it was trading in the last three weeks. For those five settlement days, the stock closed at an average price of RM2.45.
While it only closed at its intra-day low on April 23, it did close near to its day's low for the other four days.
A Bursa official said that Bursa's current rules were in line with those of other exchanges such as Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX) and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX).
“However, in the discharge of our obligation to ensure a fair and orderly market, Bursa Malaysia has and will continue to review the effectiveness of its rules to ensure they meet their intended objectives,” said the Bursa official.
He added that SGX and HKEX allowed for options (ii) and (iii) .

Sunday 29 April 2012

How Checklists Can Help Investors



April 12 2012 

It is easy to drown in the flood of information available in the financial markets. There's always one more report to read, one more press release to peruse or one more chart to interpret. In such an environment, it's easy to get pulled off course; information intended to help you, can actually make it difficult to maintain a consistent investment process.

Unfortunately, the market rewards disciplined investing and often quickly punishes emotional, distracted or disorganized approaches. What's more, it's easy to forget discipline when things are going especially well or especially bad. And then there's just human nature – humans are fallible creatures and even the best find it difficult to remember or replicate what worked three or four years ago.

SEE: Stock-Picking Strategies 

Accordingly, investors should seek out ways to stay disciplined and methodical when it comes to researching new ideas, maintaining an existing portfolio and exiting positions. One of the best ways to achieve this is the use of checklists. Just as airline and military pilots have used checklists for decades to eliminate avoidable accidents and produce better results, so too can investors use checklists to develop better and more consistent investment behaviors
The Advantages of ChecklistsWords like "disciplined" and "methodical" are going to show up a few times in this article, and for good reason. A methodical and disciplined approach means that investors are considering the full range of the possibilities and risks, practicing careful due diligence and performing the detailed research that often accompanies long-term investment success. To that end, step-by-step checklists help foster, support and reinforce that step-by-step approach.

Checklists also help investors avoid lazy mistakes or short-cuts. Many investors, particularly value investors, claim that there is a wealth of information in the details and footnotes of filings like 10-Ks. That's true, but the fact remains that investors often forget to go through every step and read all of that material. They certainly may mean well, and they may even think they have done it, but it's all too easy to forget in a hectic and busy time. In other words, a checklist ensures than an investor always does what he or she intends to do. 

Checklists are also advantageous in that they leave a decision-making trail that can be modified and corrected with time. If an investment didn't work out, the investor can often see what went wrong and that may point to a necessary change in the process. Perhaps that investor ignored large insider sales or perhaps the investor failed to investigate what new products were coming out from rivals. Whatever the case may be, it can be a new item to add to the list. Just as airlines are constantly updating pilot checklists on the basis of experience (good and bad), so too should investors.
On the flip side, investors may also learn that they are being too strict or demanding; investors who see too many stocks succeed outside of their standards may need to revisit and revise those standards. If an investor can identify what works in the market, they can compare the qualities and characteristics of those stocks to the standards demanded by their checklists and see if they match appropriately.

Emotions are often the enemy of successful investors, and checklists can help sap the emotion from investment decisions. If nothing else, the methodical process of going through a checklist introduces a bit of tedium to offset those emotions and can allow a cooler head to prevail. The routine and ritual of going through a checklist can help preserve gains or avoid chasing bad ideas by not allowing investors to get carried away with momentum or hot stories.

The Disadvantages of ChecklistsWhile checklists are useful tools and this is a pro-checklist article, fairness demands that some of the downsides and disadvantages of checklists be presented as well.

For starters, checklists can feed a "paralysis by analysis" - the idea that there's always just one more piece of information to find before an investment decision can be made. This is especially true in cases where checklists have become too long or too thorough over time.
Checklists may also provide a false sense of security. Checklists are a consummate example of "garbage in, garbage out" and if investors build checklists on the basis of trivial or incorrect views of the market, the resulting investment performance will be lacking.

Lastly, checklists can be emotionally painful. It can ding the ego or pride to realize that you cannot do it all and need to rely on refreshers. Likewise, some investors love the rush that comes with investing on whim and emotion, and checklists can feel like straightjackets. Moreover, checklists eliminate some of the excuses that investors may like to use to explain losses – a consistent and methodical approach doesn't really allow for investors blaming "shorts," hedge funds or other fictional evil-doers for their losses.

Steps to Build a More Useful ChecklistAs there are so many different valid investment strategies out there, it is beyond the scope of a single article to offer the range of appropriate checklist permutations. Instead, there are some more general philosophies and approaches that can help investors create usable checklists for their own particular approach.

Above all, it is important to identify the key steps in the process and the key opportunities for a serious error. A fundamentals-based value investor, for instance, has to consider those financial footnotes, but likely has little reason to worry about chart patterns. Relying on technical analysis, though, may have to include a number of confirming or contradictory signals before coming to a final decision on a stock, while not worrying much (if at all) about the details of the company's off-balance sheet financing.

Checklists must also be brief. These are reminders and guides, not how-to manuals. Anything beyond a single page is likely to be too unwieldy to be practical, and investors are well-advised to create separate lists for separate tasks (like buying, evaluating current holdings and selling).

Last and not least, checklists need to be consistently evaluated and revised. When something goes wrong, identify the cause and evaluate the checklist to see if it needs revision. When something goes right, the same rules apply. Not all mistakes are preventable, but it is important to identify those that are and make sure they do not reoccur.

The Bottom LineChecklists are tools, not panaceas. If an investor can identify the aspects of an investment that indicate a possibility to outperform the market, it behooves them to make sure that they carefully evaluate every potential investment for those aspects and stay away from investments that do not have them. There is nothing sexy about checklists and most investors will find them to be tedious at first. As time goes on, though, and potential mistakes are avoided in lieu of real winners, diligent checklist-users are likely to find that this is a relatively simple and cheap means of boosting returns. 


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/12/Investors-Should-Check-Out-Checklists.asp?partner=sfgate#ixzz1tPhOR0zP

4 Steps To Creating A Better Investment Strategy


August 16 2010 


It is no secret that behind every successful investment manager there is a written, measurable and repeatable investment strategy. However, many investors jump from one trade to another, putting little effort into creating and measuring their overall strategies.

Read on to learn four questions that, when answered, will help you create a better investment strategy. The following questions will help you create an investment strategy that is written, measurable and backed by your own strong beliefs. This will lead to more consistent investment performance and help you mitigate emotional investment decisions. Most importantly, it will help you avoid a scattered portfolio of individual investments that, when looked at as a whole, have no overall theme or objective.

  • Can you write down your investment strategy as a process?To quote the late Dr. W. Edwards Deming, a world famous author and management quality consultant, "If you can't describe what you are doing as a process, you don't know what you are doing." Like anything that requires a disciplined process, it is important to write down your investment strategy. Doing this will help you articulate it. Once your strategy is written, you should look over it to make sure that it matches your long-term investment objectives. Writing down your strategy gives you something to revert back to in times of chaos, which will help you avoid making emotional investment decisions. It also gives you something to review and change if you notice flaws, or your investment objectives change. If you are a professional investor, having a written strategy will help clients better understand your investment process. This can increase trust, mitigate client inquiries and increase client retention.
  • Does your investment strategy contain a belief about why investments become over or undervalued? If so, how do you exploit that?This question could relate to whether or not you believe that investment markets are efficient. Ask yourself, "What makes me smarter than the market? What is my competitive advantage?" You may have special industry knowledge or subscribe to special research that few other investors have. Or, you may have beliefs about exploiting certain market anomalies, like buying stocks with low price-to-book ratios. Once you have decided what your competitive advantage is, you must decide how you can profitably execute a long-term trading plan to exploit it.
    Your trading plan should include rules for both buying and selling investments. Also, keep in mind that your competitive advantage can eventually lose its profitability simply by other investors implementing the same strategy. On the other hand, you may believe that investment markets are completely efficient, meaning that no investor has a consistent competitive advantage. In this case, it is best to focus your strategy on minimizing taxes and transaction costs by investing in passive indexes. (To read more on market efficiency and market anomalies, see What Is Market Efficiency?, and Making Sense Of Market Anomalies.)
  • Will your investment strategy perform well in every market environment? If not, when will it perform the worst?There is an old saying on Wall Street, "The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." Good investment managers know where their investment performance comes from, and can explain their strategy's strengths and weaknesses. As market trends and economic themes change, many great investment strategies will have periods of great performance followed by periods of lagging performance. Having a good understanding of your strategy's weaknesses is crucial to maintaining your confidence and investing with conviction, even if your strategy is temporarily out of vogue. It can also help you find strategies that may complement your own. A popular example of this would be mixing both value and growth investing strategies.
  • Do you have a system in place for measuring the effectiveness of your investment strategy?It is difficult to improve or fully understand something that you do not measure. For this reason, you should have benchmark to measure the effectiveness of your investment strategy. Your benchmark should match your investment objective, which in turn, should match your investment strategy.

    Two common types of investment benchmarks are relative and absolute benchmarks. An example of a relative benchmark would be a passive market index, like the S&P 500 Index or the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index. An example of an absolute benchmark would be a target return, such as 6% annually. Although it can be a time consuming process, it is important to consider the amount of risk you are taking relative to your investment benchmark. You can do this by recording the volatility of your portfolio's returns, and comparing it to the volatility of your benchmark's returns over of periods of time. More sophisticated measures of returns that adjust for risk are the Treynor Ratio and the Sharpe Ratio. (For more on risk adjusted returns please read, Understanding Volatility Measurements and Measure Your Portfolio's Performance.)

ConclusionSun Tzu, an ancient Chinese military general and strategist, once said, "Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat". Sun Tzu knew that having a well thought out strategy before you go into battle is crucial to winning. Good money managers have a clear understanding of why investments are over and undervalued, and know what drives their investment performance. If you are going to battle against them everyday in investment markets, shouldn't you? Great trades may win battles, but a well-thought-out investment strategy wins wars.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/10/creating-a-better-investment-strategy.asp?partner=sfgate#ixzz1tPbBRQ5O

Credit ratings cut on cards for Malaysia


Credit ratings cut on cards for Malaysia
Malaysia Sun
Saturday 28th April, 2012  
Malaysia faces a credit ratings cut over concerns about its high national debt.
Malaysia faces a credit ratings cut over concerns about its high national debt.

Standard Poor's and Moody's have said there is a possibility that the credit rating could be downgraded if the debt is not lowered.

While Malaysia's central bank has said the national debt is manageable given Malaysia's improved economic credentials, there have been suggestions the debt has been created by current government politicians who have spent large amounts of government money to gain support ahead of the nearing general election.

The Malaysian national debt currently stands at 54 per cent of its gross domestic product.

Bersih: Punca Berlaku Kemalangan

Saturday 28 April 2012

SILVER BIRD GROUP BERHAD

THE PRELIMINARY PROPOSED CORPORATE AND DEBT RESTRUCTURING SCHEME (“PCDRS”) OF SBGB AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES (COLLECTIVELY KNOWN AS THE SBGB GROUP”))


                                                               Notes  RM’000
Shareholders’ funds as at 31 October 2011        213,423
Property, Plant & Equipment impairment       1    (98,005)
Goodwill impairment                                     2    (36,730)
Receivables impairment                                3  (110,754)
Cash reduction                                             4      (6,442)
Inventory reduction                                      5      (5,232)
Payables adjustments                                   6    (25,302)
Increased borrowings                                   7    (14,212)
Others                                                         8         (407)
                                                                     ------------
                                                                       (297,084)
                                                                      ________
Shareholders’ funds as at 29 February 2012      (83,661)
                                                                       =======


http://announcements.bursamalaysia.com/EDMS/edmsweb.nsf/all/FCE47820DA0472AF482579ED004296E5/$File/Silver%20Brid%20Financial%20Position%20reconciliation.pdf

http://announcements.bursamalaysia.com/EDMS/edmsweb.nsf/LsvAllByID/FCE47820DA0472AF482579ED004296E5?OpenDocument

Notes

1. Impairment to fair value, after taking into consideration additional depreciation since 31 October 2011, write down of assets that should have been expensed to profit & loss as opposed to being capitalized, movements in acquisitions and disposals, write-offs of assets that cannot be physically identified, write backs of assets that were not previously taken up, and possibly adjustments to assets that may have been suspected to be capitalized above fair market value arising partly from the preliminary forensic investigation.

 2. In view of the net liabilities position of the Group, goodwill is impaired in totality. 

 3. Adjustments have been made for movements in the ordinary course of business between 31 October 2011 and 29 February 2012, and which may relate to the losses incurred during the said period, provisions for doubtful debts and suspected financial irregularities arising from the preliminary findings of the forensic investigation.

4. Adjustments have been made for movements in the ordinary course of business between 31 October 2011 and 29 February 2012, and which may relate to the losses incurred during the said period, and after reconciling for transactions relating to suspected financial irregularities arising from the preliminary findings of the forensic investigation.

5. Adjustments have been made for movements in the ordinary course of business between 31 October 2011 and 29 February 2012, and which may relate to the losses incurred during the said period, and for obsolete inventories and inventories that cannot be physically identified. 

 6. Adjustments have been made for movements in the ordinary course of business between 31 October 2011 and 29 February 2012, and which may relate to the losses incurred during the said period, and for provisions relating to suspected financial irregularities arising from the preliminary findings of the forensic investigation.

7. Increased borrowings can be related to additional net borrowings of the Group between 31 October 2011 and 29 February 2012. Certain facilities, such as bonds, were paid off, whilst additional borrowings were drawn down, in particular bankers acceptances, during the period.

8. Others, relate to the write-off of investment in KPF Quality Foods Sdn Bhd, and increased deferred taxation provisions. The basis of arriving at the 29 February 2012 position is set out in the notes to the financial position.

Friday 27 April 2012

Nestle Malaysia: The Highest Price per Share Stock in Bursa Malaysia today. Well done.


Friday April 27, 2012

Nestle Malaysia plans major capex investment

By SHARIDAN M. ALI
sharidan@thestar.com.my

Managing director Peter R. Vogt said the company planned quite a sizeable investment to expand its manufacturing facility in Shah Alam.
“At the moment our engineering department is working on which production lines should be added and what is the exact size of investment needed,” he told reporters after the company's AGM yesterday.
Last year, Nestle Malaysia bought a piece of land adjacent to the company's plant in Shah Alam from British American Tobacco (M) Bhd (BAT) for RM36mil cash.
As for this year's capex, Vogt said it would spend about RM180mil, where a large portion of it would be for the upgrading of equipment.
“We are running 80% to 90% of capacity utilisation in many areas of our production thus we need to upgrade a lot of basic equipment,” he said.
Asked if Nestle was planning to increase the prices of its products, Vogt said the company had no plan to do so for the time being but was closely monitoring the price movements of commodities.
“We are buying forward or hedging certain commodities to minimise the impact of cost spike. We also are continuing with our Nestle Continuous Excellence initiatives, where every year we find new ways to save on cost.
“The objective of all these is to maintain the current price as long as we can,” he said.
Some of Nestle Malaysia's main raw materials used in its products are coffee, cocoa powder and milk solids.
On new product launches, Vogt said Nestle had strategised to have fewer but good quality product launches that would have long and strong marketability.
“The best example is our newest product Nescafe Dolce Gusto Espressomachine where we are planning to expand on its variety of beverages.
“Another good example is Milo, which is still strong in the market even after 40 to 50 years,” he said.
Asked whether Nestle Malaysia would market Pfizer's baby food products soon following the recent announcement that Nestle SA was acquiring Pfizer's infant nutrition division, Vogt said the transaction would need necessary regulatory approvals that would take six to 12 months.
“It's too early to say now how we are going to integrate this new development into Nestle Malaysia,” he said.
Despite the many uncertainties that could dampen global economic growth and further drive volatility in commodity costs, Nestle Malaysia on Wednesday announced a good set of financial results.
Its net profit for its first quarter ended March 31 was up 7.5% to RM158.1mil from the same quarter last year.
Turnover for the quarter stood at RM1.16bil, which reflected an 8.5% increase from a year ago.
The growth was driven by both domestic and export sales.
Vogt noted that Nestle Malaysia, which celebrated its 100th anniversary in Malaysia this year, had achieved the highest level rating in the 2011 Creating Shared Value (CSV) report, which accompanied the group's corporate and financial reports.
“The report was externally verified by Bureau Veritas Certification for an A+rating in accordance with Global Reporting Initiative 3.0 standards for the food Processing sector,” he said.

Thursday 26 April 2012

How to do a stock research & analysis.


Opto Circuits India Ltd - Stock Research & Analysis
(15 Dec 2008)

Synopsis

Opto Circuits is a small company in Medical Electronics industry with focus in the niche areas of invasive (coronary stents) and non-invasive (sensors, patient monitors) segments. Prior to '2002 Opto's Revenues were less than Rs. 50 Cr. Today Revenues stand at Rs.468 Cr, with exports accounting for more than 95% of Revenues. Opto Circuits is based in Bangalore India and operates out of offices established in USA, Europe, South-East Asia, Latin America and the Middle East and boasts of a strong international distribution network present in over 70 countries.

The Numbers speak for themselves. Net profit margins are healthy (over 28%), great return on equity (~ 40%, unmatched in the Medical Electronics industry), and solid return on invested capital ratios (over 45%). Financial health has been steadily improving over the years with comfortable financial leverage (1.34) and Debt to equity (0.31), with solid Current & Quick ratios. However, Opto Circuits still has a long way to go before it can show loads of excess cash on its books, due to its aggressive business expansion. Free Cash Flow as a percentage of sales is ~6 percent. It has consistently increased Dividends per share and has a unique track record of rewarding shareholders with bonus shares every year, for the 7th straight year! Opto Circuits seems to enjoy an above-average Economic Moat and fares very well when compared to its peers in this Peer Comparison snapshot.

Though there are Significant Risks going forward, Opto Circuits has lots of positives going for it. Over the last 7 years since FY2002, Opto Circuits Revenues have clocked a long term sales growth of over 45% while long term EPS growth has galloped at a handsome 60% plus. It has been working steadily grow its business through pursuing organic growth through investments in manufacturing capacities and penetrating into newer markets, supplemented by inorganic growth through judicious acquisitions. To its credit Opto circuits has managed acquisitions so far quite well, drawing synergies by leveraging distribution networks and lower-cost manufacturing bases. There is some evidence of Sustainable Growth over the medium term. We posed a few questions to Opto Circuits Management to be able to understand and assess its longer-term prospects and growth sustainability, better.

Opto's track record so far evidences early signs of being served by a Competent Management Team. The stock is promising and there's nothing wrong with investing in a young growth company like Opto Circuits, as long as you know what you are getting into. It has a long way to go before it qualifies to be among the Core holdings in anyone's Portfolio. It’s a long shot, though one that might just pay you back many times over. However, this is only half the story because even the best companies are poor investments if purchased at too high a price. We cover Opto Circuits' stock valuation in the other half story. 

Read more here:

Midsize Stocks - A Good Choice for Anyone's Nest Egg

It isn’t easy to find a stock that has the magic — an enticing financial elixir that combines stability with the promise of a decent rate of growth.

  • Large-company stocks are relatively stable but move too slowly for many investors. 
  • Small-company stocks’ value can rise quickly but could be seen as a gamble at a time in which investors aren’t exactly excited by the notion of taking on added risk. 
Say the experts: Find the middle. “The $2 billion to $7 billion market-cap range is really a sweet spot in the market,” says Don Easley, portfolio manager of the T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid-Cap Growth Fund.

“There are a lot of interesting companies in that area and there’s certainly a place for mid-caps in anyone’s portfolio.”

Stocks at these midsized companies aren’t called the“sweet spot”without reason. Indeed, the class of stocks that not too many years ago were classless — lumped in with large-cap stocks — has outperformed their larger and smaller peers. 

BetterInvesting uses annual revenue to determine a company’s category.

  • For instance, midsized companies have annual revenues between $500 million and $5 billion
  • Small companies have revenue below $500 million and 
  • large-company revenue weighs in at more than $5 billion.

The companies screened should satisfy the following conditions:

1.  Past performances

  • trailing-12-month revenues of between $500 million and $5 billion;
  • five-year sales and earnings growth of at least 12 percent.
2.  Projected future performances
  • forecasted five-year annual earnings and sales growth of 12 percent; and 
  • a projected annual total return for the next three to five years of at least 12 percent. 

Also, look for Financial Strength and Earnings Predictability. 

As with any stock screen,this is just a starting point for research; no investment recommendations are intended.

Also, make sure any company of interest looks suitable on a Stock Selection Guide using your own judgments.