PERFORMANCE of SPACS at various stages (Summary)
The securities of
the six companies still looking for a transaction are
- up 2.20% since
their original offerings versus an average decrease of 7.01% for the
NASDAQ Composite.
Of the 11
companies that have open deals,
- the securities of 10 of these companies
are trading at or above their original offering price and 1 is trading
below.
- The average company with an open transaction is up 4.72% versus
an average decrease of 5.97% for the NASDAQ Composite.
Of
the 80 companies that have completed transactions and have not yet been
acquired,
- the securities of only 24 of these companies are trading
above their original offering price and 56 are trading below.
- The
average company is down 15.53% versus an average decline of 5.15% for
the NASDAQ Composite.
The 7 companies that have either been acquired or
are in the process of being acquired
- are down on average 75.31% versus
an average increase of 17.81% for the NASDAQ Composite.
SUMMARY NOTES
Wall Street has never
been bashful about recycling old products and concepts. One of the
recent concepts to be recycled is the blank check IPO. Blank check
companies are also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
(SPACS).
As of December 11, 2009, 162 SPACS have gone public
since August of 2003, raising gross proceeds totaling $22,003,690,655
(give or take a buck or two). Another 67 companies currently have
registration statements on file with the SEC and are looking to raise
$10,787,120,608 (once again, give or take a buck or two). If you back
out the companies that filed their initial registration statements on or
before December 31, 2007, there are 27 companies currently in
registration that are looking to raise $3,899,000,000. Another 33
companies have filed and withdrawn registration statements; two of these
companies subsequently went public on London’s AIM stock exchange,
where they raised gross proceeds totaling $381 million. The companies
that withdrew their registration statements were looking to raise
$6,401,000,000
87 companies have actually completed acquisitions,
and another 11 have deals pending. Of the companies that have completed
transactions, seven have either been acquired or are in the process of
being acquired. There are 59 companies that have failed to close on
their proposed acquisitions and have either liquidated or are currently
in the process of liquidating. These companies raised a total of
$7,050,111,754 in their offerings. The shareholders of ten of these
liquidated companies have extended the corporate charters for nine of
companies so that they could operate as a shell. One of these companies
has actually closed on a transaction.
There are 5 SPACS still looking for deals.
There
have been several high profile transactions. The first was the
acquisition of Jamba Juice Company by Services Acquisition Corporation
International. Freedom Acquisition Holdings subsequently acquired GLG
Partners and Endeavor Acquisition acquired American Apparel.
The first of the new crop of blank check companies went public on August 23, 2003.
PERFORMANCE
Of
the 80 companies that have completed transactions and have not yet been
acquired, the securities of only 24 of these companies are trading
above their original offering price and 56 are trading below. The
average company is down 15.53% versus an average decline of 5.15% for
the NASDAQ Composite. The 7 companies that have either been acquired or
are in the process of being acquired are down on average 75.31% versus
an average increase of 17.81% for the NASDAQ Composite.
Of the 11
companies that have open deals, the securities of 10 of these companies
are trading at or above their original offering price and 1 is trading
below. The average company with an open transaction is up 4.72% versus
an average decrease of 5.97% for the NASDAQ Composite. The securities of
the six companies still looking for a transaction are up 2.20% since
their original offerings versus an average decrease of 7.01% for the
NASDAQ Composite.
A note on methodology: When calculating
the return percentages for each of the companies, I have added the
current market value of the applicable common shares and warrants,
subtracted the unit cost, and divided the resulting sum by the original
unit cost. In those instances where companies have redeemed their
warrants, for the warrant value I have used the value that was created
through the exercise of the warrant. For example, in December 2007, HLS
Systems International (originally Chardan China North Acquisition)
redeemed its warrants. The common stock of HLS last traded at $11.97. If
you assume that $6.97 of value has been created from each of the two
warrants (which had a strike price of $5.00 per share), the original
units, which were priced at $6.00 and are no longer trading, now have a
value of $25.91 ($11.97 + $6.97 + $6.97). The computation for
calculating the return on HLS: $11.97 + $6.97M+ $6.97 - $6.00 = ($19.91)
divided by $6.00 yields a return of 331.83%.
I realize that the
second calculation does not include the cost of exercising the warrants.
If we add the exercise cost of the two warrants ($10.00) to the
original cost of the unit ($6.00), our basis is $16.00. We now own three
shares with a total value of $15.60. As an alternative, we could
compute the return as follows: $35.91 - $16.00 = $19.91. $19.91 divided
by $16.00 yields a negative return of 122.44%.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=55438
Keep INVESTING Simple and Safe (KISS) ****Investment Philosophy, Strategy and various Valuation Methods**** The same forces that bring risk into investing in the stock market also make possible the large gains many investors enjoy. It’s true that the fluctuations in the market make for losses as well as gains but if you have a proven strategy and stick with it over the long term you will be a winner!****Warren Buffett: Rule No. 1 - Never lose money. Rule No. 2 - Never forget Rule No. 1.
Thursday, 25 July 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment