Friday, 7 September 2012

Median Household Income in the United States


Median Household Income in the United States




First off - what is median household income?

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, "household median income" is defined as "the amount which divides the income distribution into two equal groups, half having income above that amount, and half having income below that amount."

The U.S. Census Bureau currently publishes median household income data from 1975 until present day.


YearNo. of HouseholdsNominal $Inflation Adjusted $
2010118,682,000$47,022$49,445
2009117,538,000$47,361$50,599
2008117,181,000$47,832$50,939
2007116,783,000$47,752$52,823
2006116,011,000$45,817$52,124
2005114,384,000$44,082$51,739
2004113,343,000$42,167$51,174
2003112,000,000$41,185$51,353
2002111,278,000$40,347$51,398
2001109,297,000$40,148$52,005
2000108,209,000$39,926$53,164
1999106,434,000$38,714$53,252
1998103,874,000$36,932$51,944
1997102,528,000$35,086$50,123
1996101,018,000$33,593$49,112
199599,627,000$32,191$48,408
199498,990,000$30,321$46,937
199397,107,000$29,244$46,419
199296,426,000$28,547$46,646
199195,669,000$27,937$47,032
199094,312,000$27,601$48,423
198993,347,000$26,550$49,076
198892,830,000$24,879$48,216
198791,124,000$23,685$47,848
198689,479,000$22,588$47,256
198588,458,000$21,405$45,640
198486,789,000$20,295$44,802
198385,407,000$18,859$43,453
198283,918,000$18,422$43,758
198183,527,000$17,375$43,876
198082,368,000$16,017$44,616
197980,776,000$14,605$46,074
197877,330,000$13,121$46,202
197776,030,000$11,743$44,481
197674,142,000$10,962$44,201
197572,867,000$10,218$43,479
197471,163,000$9,600$44,649
197369,859,000$8,945$46,109
197268,251,000$8,226$45,196
197166,676,000$7,671$43,340
197064,778,000$7,396$43,766
196963,401,000$7,057$44,108
196862,214,000$6,464$42,527
196760,813,000$5,952$40,770



-- U.S. Median Household Income Chart - 1975 - 2010 --


Davemanuel.com Articles That Mention Median Household Income:

Report: Median Household Income Has Fallen Since Economic "Recovery" Started

Median Household Income Continues to Drop in the United States

It's Good to Live Near Washington, D.C. 

The High Cost of Gasoline

It's Now Been Three Years Since The "Great Recession" Started.. 


Source: U.S. Census Bureau (*.pdf)



http://www.davemanuel.com/median-household-income.php

Inflation Calculator
http://www.davemanuel.com/inflation-calculator.php

Now at Tesco: Drive-Through Grocery Pickup

By Sarah Shannon - Sep 4, 2012


Jason Alden/Bloomberg
A page from the Tesco website is displayed for a photograph on an iPad.
When Nikki Dye tired of supermarket queues, she tried having her groceries delivered, but that meant committing to being at home for a two-hour delivery window. Now, she’s switched to a service where she can order online and then collect her groceries from a local store.
By yearend, Tesco expects to complete collection points in 150 stores as part of a 1 billion-pound ($1.6 billion) initiative to revive domestic sales. Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg
“It’s so quick,” the 25-year-old working mother said as Tesco Plc (TSCO) staff at the store in the southern English town of Harlow loaded her car trunk with goods costing 80 pounds ($127).
With same-store sales falling, Tesco is betting it can get a lift from shoppers like Dye by tripling the number of outlets offering what it calls click and collect. The chain’s leading share of the U.K. grocery market shrunk to a seven-year low this year as more Britons chose upscale competitors such as Waitrose Ltd. or discounters like Iceland Foods Ltd. and Aldi.
By yearend, Tesco expects to complete collection points in 150 stores as part of a 1 billion-pound ($1.6 billion) initiative to revive domestic sales. The grocer is also hiring 20,000 staff, updating its house brand products, refreshing stores and adding more personalized promotions.
Bryan Roberts, an analyst at Kantar Retail in London, said click and collect will give shoppers a reason to choose Tesco over its competitors. Among the top four grocers in the U.K., onlyWal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Asda, (WMT) the No. 2 chain, has a similar service for groceries, and it’s just in a trial stage. The service also helps Tesco stand out from online retailers.

‘Ahead of the Pack’

“It’s going to be a key growth opportunity,” Roberts said. “The economics are much superior to home delivery,” which requires grocers to operate a fleet of vans and drivers.
Tesco, based in Cheshunt, England, expects that making shopping easier will convince customers to come back more often. Deloitte LLP estimates that people who shop via different methods -- the Internet, smart phones and visits to the supermarket -- spend more than double those who only shop at physical stores.
Click and collect “is gaining traction, and Tesco is ahead of the pack,” said Clive Black, an analyst at Shore Capital who recommends holding the stock. “While it’s a very modest part of supermarket activity it is one that’s expected to grow.”
Web sales, which accounted for 3.4 percent of U.K. grocery spending last year, are set to almost double over the next five years, according to the Institute of Grocery Distribution.

Declining Sales

Tesco’s domestic sales have declined for the last four quarters, with U.K. same-store revenue falling 1.5 percent in the 13 weeks ended May 26. That has left Chief Executive Officer Philip Clarke to seek new avenues for growth. Expanding click & collect, which started from a store in southern England two years ago, forms a part of his plan.
The service relies on its simplicity and convenience, said Ken Towle, Tesco’s director of Internet retailing. For a 2-pound fee, a shopper’s groceries are picked, packed and stored at the drive-through point. When the customer arrives, a staffer loads the groceries into the trunk.
“What customers like is they are in control,” Towle said. “They choose when they want it to be available. It de-stresses the whole experience for them.”
The expansion has come at a cost. Tesco has had to train staff in customer service and product returns, Towle said. And adding the collection points to stores has cut the floorspace available to sell products.
A big challenge is linking up online orders with picking and packing the groceries in the chosen time-slot from the store, according to Chris Gates, director of retail at Hitachi Consulting, a technology adviser that has worked with Tesco. Another issue is ensuring stores can handle returns and have enough supplies to account for both online and physical buyers.

Asda Trial

“Whilst companies realize it’s the way customers want to shop, it takes a lot of investment to make it happen,” Gates said. Retailers, he said, typically see a return on their investment in two years.
Asda says it has had trouble getting planning permission to set-up drive-through collection points. The company started testing a 1.50-pound-per-order click & collect for groceries this year and has about 10 outlets. Stores with the service get about 60 to 100 orders a week almost immediately, said Jon Wragg, director of Asda’s multi-channel strategy.
The retailer has trialed low-cost alternatives like a simple shelter in a carpark with a van that customers collect from, to a formal drive-through attached to the store.
French Insight?
“It’s all the understanding and refining of the experience for customers that I think is going to be tough,” Wragg said.
France may offer some insight into the concept’s potential. While British grocers have focused on home delivery of online orders, French companies have embraced drive-throughs instead.
Groupe Auchan SA has had drive-in collection since 2000, and Le Clerc, Casino Guichard-Perrachon SA (CO) and Carrefour SA (CA) also now offer the service. Planet Retail estimates there were about 1,000 drive-through points in France in May. Le Clerc expects about 5 percent of its sales to come from the drive-through format by 2015, up from 1.4 percent in 2011.
Planet Retail analyst Malcolm Pinkerton estimates that Tesco will generate about 6.4 percent of its overall U.K. sales from online orders this year, which will surge to 9.3 percent, or 5.9 billion pounds, by 2017 as click & collect is extended.
“Anybody that’s in retail who is not multi-channel would want to think quickly about having a strategy,” said Colin Jeffrey, director of retail research at Deloitte Digital. Click and collect is “a must, but it’s a massive challenge.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-03/now-at-tesco-drive-through-grocery-pickup.html?cmpid=yhoo

How to buy a house at UK auction





How NOT to bid at auction

How to buy a house at UK auction


UK house prices ruining UK economy






At 5 min, "invest in other assets."

UK Economy Crash Course (whole presentation)






Also visit: 

Why UK will have economic depression


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PQZuB1TeP4&feature=endscreen

How to Buy Properties and Sell Quickly


How to buy income properties?


propert

Warren Buffett - How to Become the Person You Want


MCA: The government of the day must listen to the rakyat and act in accordance with national interest




MCA is the government.

Tee Keat: The reality of bi-partisan politics. Young people looking for participatory democracy.


Wednesday, 5 September 2012

Auditors declare Talam deal ‘sound commercial decision’


September 05, 2012


Selangor had appointed the auditors following claims of impropriety from MCA. — File pic
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 5 — Independent auditors have cleared the Selangor government of any irregularities in its debt recovery exercise involving the company formerly known as Talam Corporation and declared it a “sound commercial decision,” Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim said today.
Khalid’s administration had appointed KPMG Transaction and Restructuring Sdn Bhd (KPMG) in July to review its RM392 million debt recovery exercise following allegations by MCA that the state government’s dealings with Talam — now known as Trinity Corporation — was lopsided and had ended up costing taxpayers up to RM1 billion.
Khalid said the debt settlement was in the form of assets comprising nine plots of land, two properties, a 60 per cent stake in a subsidiary of Talam and cash/debt assignment.
“From the review exercise, KPMG is of the view that the Selangor state government made a sound commercial decision under the circumstances at that point in time in relation to the settlement arrangement.
“The settlement process is still ongoing and based on currently available information, the gross consideration is sufficient for Menteri Besar Selangor Incorporated (MBI), being the party tasked with recovering the debts on behalf of the Selangor state government and its subsidiaries, to recover the Talam debts, with no debt waiver by MBI.”
In July, Khalid had said the Selangor government would appoint independent auditors to review its debt restructuring agreement with Talam Corporation and clear the air over claims of funds abuse by MCA.
Khalid insisted his administration had not relieved Talam Corp of its debts as claimed, but instead had recovered monies that the troubled property developer owed the state’s subsidiaries.
MCA Young Professionals Bureau chairman Datuk Chua Tee Yong had recently alleged that Khalid’s administration bought over Talam Corp’s RM676 million assets to clear the firm’s outstanding debts of RM392 million to three state subsidiaries.
He further claimed that the RM392 million in the supplementary budget approved by the state assembly in November 2010 to the MBI was used by the state government for the alleged bailout.
Trinity Corporation had also denied allegations that it sold land to the Selangor state government at above market value, pointing out that the valuation fell under the scrutiny of the Securities Commission’s Assets Valuation Department.
The company added in a stock exchange filing in July that the valuation was also approved by SC and Bursa Malaysia.
Speaking today, Khalid said the auditor’s conclusion demonstrated that the debt recovery was legal, ethical, done in good faith and had in no way compromised the interests of the state, its subsidiaries or the people of Selangor.
Khalid added that the state had appointed four spokesmen to speak about the matter. The four are MPs Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad from Kuala Selangor, Tony Pua from Petaling Jaya Utara, William Leong from Selayang and political secretary to the mentri besar, Faekah Husin.
“These four are authorised to discuss and debate the issue with any individuals or organisations they deem fit. We are confident that with their expert command of the facts at hand, they will able to facilitate healthy and informative discourse,” said Khalid.


http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/auditors-declare-talam-deal-sound-commercial-decision/

Related:
http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2012/07/talam-for-dummies.html

Stocks and Bonds: Risk vs. Return



Take a good look at this chart.

It is a portfolio consisting of only 2 assets:  stock and bond.  

Here are some interesting points:  

1.  100% in Stock
This portfolio has the highest risk and also probability of the highest return.

2.  100% in Bond
This portfolio has low risk (NOTE: NOT THE LOWEST) and has lower return.

3.  50% in Stock and 50% in Bond
This portfolio has the same risk as and has higher return than the portfolio that is 100% in Bond.

4.  25% in Stock and 75% in Bond
This portfolio has the lowest risk and has higher return than the portfolio that is 100% in Bond.


(You may assume that holding cash giving an interest rate of 3% is the equivalent of holding a bond with a coupon rate of 3%.)


Conclusion:

Holding 100% in bond carries the same risk as holding 50% in stock and 50% in bond.  However, the probability of a higher return for the same risk should make investors favour holding 50% in stock and 50% in bondthan to hold 100% in bond.

For those who are very risk averse, for example in the present falling market, the lowest risk is the portfolio that is 25% stock and 75% bond, and not the portfolio that is 100% in bond.  Moreover, the portfolio that is 25% stock and 75% bond, offers a probability of higher return for lower risk, that the portfolio with 100% in bond.
London luxury home market risks price crash

Tuesday, 04 September 2012

(Reuters) - Developers rushing to build top-quality London homes to cash in on strong overseas demand are in danger of being stung by a price crash as they flood the market, property consultancy EC Harris said.
Over 15,000 homes in developments worth more than £38 billion (RM187.81 billion) are due for completion in London's most expensive neighbourhoods in the next 10 years, a 70% jump on last year, an EC Harris report said Monday.
The total floor area covers almost 20 million sq ft — equivalent to the size of the London Olympic park — and includes properties in upmarket Mayfair, the City of London financial district and the south bank of the river Thames.
"Developers are racing to get first to site because they don't want to miss out on the boom that's happening," said Mark Farmer, head of residential at EC Harris. "There is a danger that if all these schemes happen that you'll have a massive oversupply."
Prices for luxury homes have surged in recent years after economic turmoil in Europe and political uprisings across North Africa drove investors to the relative safety of central London property.
Signs of a slowdown appeared after the UK government said in March it would clamp down on tax avoidance by overseas buyers of homes costing more than £2 million.
Prices for the best central London homes rose 1.8% in the three months to August, the weakest quarterly growth since November 2010, property consultant Knight Frank said Monday.
About 4,000 high-end homes are scheduled to be built in 2016 alone, an eight-fold increase on the average number built in London each year. The risk of over-building may be tempered by a tight supply in development finance, Farmer said.
Recent entrants to the market include offices and shops developer British Land, which said in July it would redevelop a block in Mayfair into luxury flats, and Malaysian developers SP Setia and Sime Darby, which plan to build over 3,000 homes at Battersea Power Station.
Such developers have been described as "late to the party" by some residential players.
A May report from Development Securities warned that London luxury home prices could halve if the eurozone broke up.
Other risks include further devaluation of the euro, which would make London property look more expensive, and changes to the UK planning system that make it easier to convert offices to homes and add to the pipeline, EC Harris said.
"The reality is that no one knows what the conditions will be in five or 10 years," he said.

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

China Stocks a Screaming Buy: Strategist


China Stocks a Screaming Buy: Strategist

Published: Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012 | 3:32 AM ET
Lisa Oake, Anchor CNBC Asia Pacific
By: Lisa Oake
Co-Host of CNBC Asia's Squawk Box


The old adage in the stock market is never try to catch a falling knife.  With the Shanghai Composite Index at levels not seen since the aftermath of the financial crisis, many investors are steering well clear of Chinese stocks.
Liu Jin | AFP | Getty Images

But Stephen Sheung, Investment Strategist at SHK Private, thinks this is the perfect time to buy Chinese equities [.SSEC  2043.65    -15.50 (-0.75%)   ]. “We still see a rebound in the Chinese economy over the course of the year and equities warrant a higher valuation than now,” Sheung told CNBC Asia’s “Squawk Box.”           
He added that China’s cautious approach to stimulate the economy will result in a gentle re-acceleration of economic growth, but investors should not make the mistake of comparing Beijing’s recent efforts to stimulate the economy with the massive $586 billion stimulus program of 2008.
Policy Lag
“This time around, the policies are not coming directly from Beijing, but more so at the provincial level. The Chinese government is trying to get more private capital to be more involved in the investment projects so the policy lag might be longer,” said Sheung.
Beijing — wary of stoking inflation and reigniting property speculation — is using a lighter hand with stimulus this time around. Despite mounting evidence the economy is grinding lower, the central bank has been quiet since last cutting interest rates in July.

“Chinese GDP in the next few quarters will be at a more stable and calm level in terms of pick up. You might have to wait until November to December to actually see things turn around, but when that comes, you'll see a cyclical pick up in (corporate) earnings and the GDP,” said Sheung.
Until then, he is advising investors to take advantage of China’s economic downtime and get stocks on the cheap.
“Valuations are the solid foundation for Chinese equities. What investors have to do right now is really look ahead,” he said.


Follow Lisa Oake on Twitter: @LisaCNBC
© 2012 CNBC.com


"You can't get rich without working hard, taking risks, investing and reinvesting your profits."


'Drink Less, Work More', Billionaire Tells Non-Rich

 Gina RinehartNow, the Australian mining heiress, worth $19 billion and earlier this year thought to be the world's richest woman, has sparked another controversy in her latest column in Australian Resources and Investment magazine. (Yes, I am a registered reader online.) Rinehart rails against class warfare and says the non-rich should stop attacking the rich and go to work.
"There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she writes. "If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain. Do something to make more money yourself - spend less time drinking, or smoking and socializing and more time working."

Companies in KLSE growing net profit > 15% per year over the last 3 or 4 years.

Net Profit CAGR (as at July 2012)
Company Period CAGR
(Main Board) Years 
MBSB 3 115.37%
GENTING 3 71.42%
AXIATA 3 67.63%
UEMLAND 3 59.62%
LAND & GENERAL  3 57.92%
PESTECH 3 54.36%
TRADEWINDS 3 45.11%
HLFG 3 44.98%
KPS 3 36.92%
KLCCP 3 34.55%
BUMI ARMADA 3 33.84%
FRASER & NEAVE 3 31.93%
SUPERMAX 3 31.19%
GENM 3 31.05%
COASTAL 4 28.84%
MAYBANK 3 28.45%
CIMB 3 27.34%
DIALOG 3 26.31%
CBIP 4 23.15%
WEIDA 4 22.66%
AMMB 4 22.60%
CHINA STATIONERY 4 22.51%
TANCHONG 4 21.38%
RHBCAP 4 20.47%
XIDELANG 3 20.45%
PARAMOUNT 3 19.55%
FREIGHT 3 17.45%
AEON 3 17.44%
DRB-HICOM 3 17.43%
KPJ 4 15.42%
HLBANK 3 15.23%













Share Buybacks - What the Board of Directors can choose to do with these?


Upon the purchase by the Company of its own Shares, the Board of Directors of the Company can choose to:-

(i) cancel all or part of the Shares purchased; and/or
(ii) retain all or part of the Purchased Shares as treasury shares; and/or
(iii) distribute the treasury shares as share dividends to the Company’s shareholders for the time being; and/or
(iv) resell the treasury shares on Bursa Securities.

Sunday, 2 September 2012

Impossible Magic Trick

Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) & The Property Owner


The 2012 Budget unveiled on 7 October 2011 included a revision of the Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT)Posted Date: Mar 15, 2012
By: Jennifer Chang
Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) & The Property Owner
The 2012 Budget unveiled on 7 October 2011 included a revision of the Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) rate from the 5% to 10% as part of the Government’s efforts to curb property speculation. The increase was recently gazetted and took effect from 1 January 2012 onwards. Jennifer Chang studies the impact of this move on property purchasers.
The rate of 10% applies to gains on properties held and disposed within two years while gains on properties held and disposed between two and five years will be levied a 5% RPGT rate and disposals after five years continue to be exempted from RPGT.
RPGT is a form of capital gains tax that is chargeable on gains arising from the disposal of real property, which is defined as:
• Any land situated in Malaysia and any interest, option or other right in or over such land; or
• Shares in a real property company. Anyone disposing of real property in Malaysia - whether a resident or non-resident - will be charged RPGT on the gains.
Evolution of RPGT
A tax on property was introduced in 1974 under the Land Speculation Tax Act. This was subsequently replaced with the Real Property Gains Tax Act in November 1975. Although in existence since the mid-70s, the Government pro-actively adjusted the rates of the RPGT through the years to cater to the property market conditions.
It’s natural for most people to react to the reintroduction of RPGT, having enjoyed full exemption for a few years previously, however, compared to the original rates of RPGT which range up to 30%, the recent hike of up to 10% is actually quite mild.

Impact on the Malaysian Property Owner
The disposal of a property takes place upon the signing and execution of a Sales & Purchase Agreement (SPA). The date of the SPA is significant, being the deadline to file RPGT returns and tax payments are based on SPA date. For example, the acquirer will need a 2% retention of the disposal price to be paid to the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (IRB) as part of a withholding mechanism on behalf of the seller of property and such withholding and filing of notification of disposal needs to be submitted to the IRB within 60 days from the date of SPA.
In conditional contracts which require Government consent, the date of disposal can shift to a later date than the SPA. Hence, the date of disposal shall be the date when Government consent has been obtained. Exemptions applicable to property disposals for a Malaysian individual include:
• An amount of RM10,000 or 10% of the chargeable gain (whichever is greater).
• Gain arising on disposal as a result of compulsory acquisition of property under law.
• Gain made by an individual who is a Malaysian citizen or permanent resident on one private residence.
• Gift made to the Government, State Government, local authority or approved charity.
• Gift between family members (e.g. parent and child or husband and wife).
Of importance is the fact that RPGT applies when property ownership is seen to be long-term capital. Where ownership is speculative, the IRB may view the disposal as revenue and seek to levy income tax instead. Income tax is levied at 25% for companies and up to 26% for Malaysian individuals. Of course, compared to income tax, the RPGT is preferable.
However, what is capital and what is revenue can be subjective and may depend on the property ownership and the taxpayer’s profile. For example, the sale of a residence after five years of ownership is more likely a capital transaction. On the other hand, the sale of an empty plot of land just subdivided for a project is likely to be treated as revenue.
What else do I need to know about RPGT?
Innovative property owners who have parcelled their properties in companies also need to be aware that the sale of shares in such companies may trigger RPGT. Remember, the definition of real property includes shares in a real property company, of which a substantial portion of their assets are properties.
The hike in RPGT rate from 5% to 10% is seen to be moderate and it is important to note that regionally, Malaysia is quite competitive. Countries such as the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea and India have some form of capital gains tax regime which could later extend to other types of assets as well. However, for some of our neighbours such as Singapore and Hong Kong, there is no capital gains tax regime on properties sold by resident individuals. We do hope that eventually, the RPGT rate in Malaysia will be relaxed, especially for Malaysian individuals.
Article contributed by Jennifer Chang, a Senior Executive Director with PricewaterhouseCoopers Taxation Services. She is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, the Securities Institute of Australia and International Fiscal Association. Her extensive tax and financial services experience both in Australia and Malaysia enables her to regularly advise clients on various tax matters including income tax, real property gains tax, stamp duty, service tax, applicable tax incentives and double tax treaties. She can be contacted atjennifer.chang@my.pwc.com.

Industries - Telecommunication (1)

Stock Performance Chart for Adept Telecom PLC

Stock Performance Chart for Advanced Info Service Public Company Limited

Stock Performance Chart for Allwin Telecommunication Company Limited

Stock Performance Chart for Alternative Networks PLC

Stock Performance Chart for Amalgamated Electronic Corporation Limited

Stock Performance Chart for Amcom Telecommunications Limited

Stock Performance Chart for American Tower Corporation

Stock Performance Chart for APT Satellite Holdings Limited

Stock Performance Chart for Asahi Net, Inc

Stock Performance Chart for Asia Satellite Telecommunications Holdings Limited

Stock Performance Chart for AT&T Inc.

Stock Performance Chart for Atlantic Tele-Network, Inc.

Stock Performance Chart for Avantel Softech Limited

Stock Performance Chart for Axiata Group Berhad