NVIDIA: break it down using Peter Lynch's six main categories from One Up On Wall Street.

Applying Peter Lynch's framework to NVIDIA is fascinating because Lynch was more flexible than Buffett when it came to growth and technology stocks. He famously categorized stocks to help him understand their potential and risk profile.

Based on its characteristics, NVIDIA is a powerful hybrid, but it most closely fits Lynch's definition of a Fast-Grower, with strong elements of a Stalwart and even a Turnaround in its recent history.

Let's break it down using Lynch's six main categories from One Up On Wall Street.

---

The Primary Category: The Fast-Grower

This is the home run hitter in Lynch's portfolio. These are companies growing earnings at a rapid clip (20-25%+ per year).

• NVIDIA's Fit: This is a perfect description. The SSG data shows historical EPS growth of 50.5% and sales growth of 37.5%. Lynch loved "fast-growers" that were also leaders in their industry. NVIDIA's dominance in AI and high-performance computing makes it the quintessential modern fast-grower.

• Lynch's Key Check: He warned that the stock price can get ahead of itself. He looked for P/E ratios that were reasonable relative to the growth rate (the PEG ratio). With a P/E of 44.7 and explosive growth, NVIDIA's PEG might still be attractive to growth investors, but it's undeniably high, which Lynch would note as a risk. He'd say, "You can't just buy it and forget it."

The Secondary Category: The Stalwart

These are large, well-established companies that can deliver 10-15% annual earnings growth. They aren't ten-baggers, but they are dependable and can be bought during market downturns.

• NVIDIA's Fit: With a market cap well over $1 trillion, NVIDIA is no longer a small, agile company. It's a colossus. Its sheer size makes it harder to maintain 50%+ growth, and it will inevitably slow down, transitioning it into a Stalwart. Lynch would buy Stalwarts for steady, reliable gains and for their defensive qualities during recessions.

The Tertiary Category: The Turnaround

These are companies that have been battered but are showing signs of recovery. They are cyclical and can offer dramatic gains.

• NVIDIA's Fit: Look at the EPS from the SSG: $0.39 (2021) → $0.17 (2022). 2022 was a brutal year for NVIDIA, with the crypto crash and a post-pandemic PC slump. The stock price fell dramatically. Then, it executed a spectacular turnaround driven by the AI boom, with EPS soaring to $2.94. A Lynch investor who spotted the AI catalyst during the 2022 lows would have caught a massive turnaround story.

---

What Lynch Would Look For and Ask:

1. The Story: Lynch was a master of the "story." He would love the NVIDIA story: "The company that makes the essential brains for the AI revolution." It's simple, powerful, and easy to understand.

2. The "Caffeination" of Growth: He'd want to know why the growth is happening and if it's sustainable. He'd investigate:

   • Is the AI demand a one-time bubble or a long-term paradigm shift?

   • Are customers (like every major cloud provider) locked in for the long haul?

   • How strong is the CUDA software moat? (He'd love this competitive advantage).

3. The PEG Ratio (Price-to-Earnings Growth): This was crucial for Lynch. He was wary of high P/E stocks but would pay up for strong growth.

   • P/E: 44.7 (from the SSG)

   • Earnings Growth (Est.): Let's use the SSG's EPS Long-Term Estimate of 34.3%.

   • PEG: 44.7 / 34.3 ≈ 1.3
     Lynch generally preferred a PEG ratio of 1.0 or less, but he made exceptions for exceptional companies with strong stories and durable advantages. A PEG of 1.3 is on the high side, signaling the stock is not cheap, but perhaps not wildly overvalued given the growth narrative.

4. The Financials: He would absolutely approve of the SSG data:

   • No Debt Problem: Debt-to-Capital of 11.5% is excellent.

   • Fantastic Profitability: A 64% pre-tax profit margin is a "gorilla" level number he'd love.

   • Strong ROE: A 109% return on equity is the sign of a "great company."

What Categories It Is NOT:

• A Slow Grower: Clearly not. Its growth is explosive.

• A Cyclical: While it has cyclical elements (the 2022 downturn), its core driver (AI/data centers) is seen as a long-term structural growth trend, not a short-term economic cycle like autos or steel.

• An Asset Play: Its value isn't in hidden real estate or assets on its books; it's in its intellectual property and earnings power.

Conclusion: The Lynchian Verdict

Peter Lynch would classify NVIDIA as a "Fast-Grower Turning into a Stalwart."

He would have been thrilled to discover it years ago and would have held on for a massive gain. At today's price, he would be cautiously optimistic but not a new buyer.

His likely stance would be:

• If you own it: "Don't sell a fast-grower just because it seems overvalued." He believed in holding on to great growth stories as long as the story remains intact.

• If you don't own it: He might wait for a "better story to tell," like a significant market correction that brings the price down, or a period where the stock is "stuck in neutral" while earnings continue to grow, thus making the valuation more attractive.

In short, Lynch would see NVIDIA as a fantastic company with a brilliant story, but he'd be very mindful of the price he paid. He'd tell you to do your homework, understand the AI story, and keep a close eye on whether the growth can continue to justify the premium.

 Quality versus Valuation:

Is NVIDIA a Great, Good or Gruesome company? Quality versus Valuation

To answer it, we need to judge NVIDIA by the core principles Warren Buffett famously looks for, as derived from his mentor Benjamin Graham and his own writings.

Based on Buffett's criteria, NVIDIA is a "Good" to "Great" company, but it is far from the type of business Buffett typically buys.

Here’s a breakdown using Buffett's key principles:

---

1. The Business: Easy to Understand? ✅

Buffett prefers simple businesses he can comprehend. While the semiconductor industry is complex, the fundamental concept of NVIDIA being the leading designer of high-performance GPUs (graphics processing units) is understandable. Its role as the "picks and shovels" provider for the AI gold rush is a powerful, simple narrative. However, the rapid pace of technological change and obsolescence is a factor Buffett dislikes.

Verdict: Leans towards "Understandable."

2. Durable Competitive Advantage (The Moat): ✅ ✅ ✅

This is where NVIDIA shines and approaches "Greatness."

• Brand & Mindshare: NVIDIA is synonymous with high-performance computing, AI, and deep learning.

• Switching Costs: Its CUDA software platform has created a "moat within the moat." Millions of developers and entire industries are locked into its ecosystem, making a switch to a competitor extremely difficult and costly.

• Economies of Scale & R&D: The cost of designing cutting-edge chips is astronomical. NVIDIA's massive scale and relentless R&D spending ($8.7 billion in the last quarter alone) create a huge barrier to entry.

Verdict: Exceptionally Wide and Durable Moat → Great.

3. Consistent Earnings Power: ⚠️

Buffett loves companies with predictable, recurring earnings. NVIDIA's historical financials from the SSG show the opposite: significant volatility.

• EPS: $0.39 (2021) → $0.17 (2022) → $1.19 (2023) → $2.94 (2024)
  This rollercoaster, driven by crypto booms/busts and now the AI boom, is a hallmark of a cyclical business. While the current trend is spectacularly up, the inconsistency is a red flag for a pure Buffett-style investor.

Verdict: Gruesome historically, but currently Great. The key question is durability.

4. High Profitability with Minimal Debt: ✅ ✅

This is another area where NVIDIA excels and aligns with Buffett.

• Profit Margins: As the SSG shows, pre-tax profit on sales has exploded to 64.4%. This is extraordinary and indicates fantastic pricing power.

• Return on Equity (ROE): A 109.2% ROE is world-class and indicates superb management efficiency in generating returns from shareholder equity.

• Debt: With a Debt-to-Capital ratio of 11.5%, NVIDIA has a very strong, conservatively financed balance sheet. Buffett loves low debt.

Verdict: Profitability is Great; Financial structure is Great.

5. Management: Rational, Candid, and Owner-Oriented ✅

While a full analysis requires deeper study of capital allocation, CEO Jensen Huang is widely regarded as a visionary, long-term leader. His focus on building the CUDA ecosystem years before it was profitable shows strategic rationality. The company has also started returning capital to shareholders via a small dividend and buybacks.

Verdict: Appears to be Good to Great.

6. The Price: The "Rule Number One" Problem ❌

This is the ultimate deal-breaker from a Buffett perspective.

"Rule No. 1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget rule No. 1."

Buffett is obsessed with the "margin of safety"—buying a wonderful company at a fair price, not a wonderful company at a wonderful (i.e., expensive) price.

• The SSG shows a Current P/E of 44.7, far above its 5-year average of 28.2.

• The stock is in the "HOLD" zone, with a low Upside/Downside Ratio of 1.3-to-1.

• The price is built on the assumption that hyper-growth will continue for years.

For Buffett, paying this price for a historically cyclical company violates his core principle of a margin of safety. The risk of permanent capital loss is too high if growth slows.

Verdict: The current price is Gruesome from a value-investing standpoint.

---

Final Synthesis: Great, Good, or Gruesome?

• As a Business (The "Great" Part): NVIDIA possesses one of the widest and most powerful competitive moats in the modern world, driven by its software ecosystem and technological leadership. Its current profitability is staggering.

• As a Buffett-Style Investment (The "Gruesome" Part): Its historical earnings volatility, exposure to technological disruption, and—most importantly—its extremely high valuation make it an unsuitable purchase for a pure disciple of Buffett.

Overall Verdict: NVIDIA is a "Great" company being traded at a "Gruesome" price.

It is the epitome of a "wonderful company at a wonderful price." A Buffett purist would admire the business but would never buy it at its current level. They would simply say, "It's outside my circle of competence and the price doesn't offer a margin of safety," and move on.

Quality versus Valuation:

A core concept in Behavioral Finance: From Despair to Euphoria and From Euphoria to Despair

The cycles demonstrate that the market's emotional waves are highly infectious.  You are fighting a powerful psychological undertow. Buying when there is "blood in the streets" (contempt/panic) feels terrifying. Selling when everyone is celebrating and getting rich (enthusiasm/greed) feels foolish. Most investors do the opposite: they buy high out of enthusiasm and sell low out of panic, locking in losses.

 The worst time to buy is when you feel most confident, and the best time to buy is when you feel most fearful. This is completely counter-intuitive to human nature.

Let's expand, discuss, and comment on the profound relationship between investor psychology and market timing, using the provided psychological cycle as our foundation.

Expansion and Discussion: The Anatomy of a Market Cycle

The provided cycle is not just a sequence of emotions; it's a narrative of how collective human psychology, driven by fear and greed, creates and destroys market value. It's a powerful model because it is recursive and timeless, repeating across different asset classes and eras.

We can break the cycle into two main phases, each with distinct psychological drivers:

Phase 1: The Bull Market (From Despair to Euphoria)

This phase is characterized by a gradual buildup of optimism that eventually spirals into irrational exuberance.

• Foundation (Contempt to Caution): The cycle correctly starts at the point of maximum pessimism. The market is low, and assets are scorned. This is precisely when value is greatest. The "prudent investors" mentioned (often value investors or contrarians) are not immune to psychology, but they are disciplined. They operate on a different mantra: "Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful." Their "drooling" is a calculation that the price paid is now significantly lower than the intrinsic value of the asset.

• Momentum (Confidence to Greed): As prices rise, early investors are rewarded. This creates confidence, which attracts more investors. This is the "recognition" phase where the herd starts to move. The market transition from "confidence" to "enthusiasm" and finally "greed" is where rationality begins to break down. The focus shifts from what an asset is worth to what price it might reach next month. This is fueled by stories of easy money and confirmed by the rising tide.

• The Peak (Indifference to Dismissal): This is the most dangerous part of the cycle for buyers. "Indifference" to fundamentals like sky-high P/E ratios is a classic sign of a bubble. Investors invent narratives to justify any price ("this time it's different"). New listings (IPOs) surge because companies can get premium valuations, often for unproven businesses. The prudent investors are already exiting, selling their assets to the latecomers driven by greed and FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out).

Phase 2: The Bear Market (From Denial to Despair)

This phase is often sharper and more violent, as it is driven by the rapid onset of fear.

• The Turn (Denial to Fear): The market begins to decline. Initially, this is met with "dismissal" and "denial." Investors, anchored to the recent high prices, see the dip as a buying opportunity. They are in denial that the trend has changed. This is where attempts to "time the market" or "catch a falling knife" often lead to significant losses.

• The Capitulation (Fear, Panic, and Contempt): As losses mount, denial turns to fear, and fear escalates into panic. This leads to a crescendo of selling—"capitulation." Investors just want out, regardless of price. They vow "never to invest again," mirroring the scorn they felt at the cycle's beginning. This point of maximum selling pressure and despair is where the next bull market is quietly born, as assets become cheap again.

Commentary: The Critical Implications for Timing

The central, and most challenging, implication of this cycle is its direct assault on the very idea of successful market timing.

1. Emotional Contagion is the Enemy: The cycle demonstrates that the market's emotional waves are infectious. An investor trying to time the market isn't just analyzing charts; they are fighting a powerful psychological undertow. Buying when there is "blood in the streets" (contempt/panic) feels terrifying. Selling when everyone is celebrating and getting rich (enthusiasm/greed) feels foolish. Most investors do the opposite: they buy high out of enthusiasm and sell low out of panic, locking in losses.

2. It's a Cycle of Time and Emotion: The provided "Sentiment Curves" link illustrates a crucial point: the market top occurs when sentiment is most optimistic, and the bottom occurs when it is most pessimistic. The worst time to buy is when you feel most confident, and the best time to buy is when you feel most fearful. This is completely counter-intuitive to human nature.

3. The "Herd Mentality" is the Default: The article's advice to "distance yourself from the herd mentality" is the golden rule. The entire cycle is a description of the herd in motion. The successful investor isn't one who predicts the herd's next move with perfect accuracy, but one who recognizes what the herd is doing and deliberately moves in the opposite direction or, more commonly, ignores it altogether.

4. A Case for Discipline Over Timing: For most investors, this cycle makes a compelling case for time in the market over timing the market. A strategy like dollar-cost averaging (investing a fixed amount regularly) automatically forces you to buy more shares when prices are low (and contempt is high) and fewer shares when prices are high (and enthusiasm is rampant). It removes emotion from the equation.

Summary

In essence, the investor psychology cycle illustrates a self-perpetuating loop where collective emotions drive market prices to extremes, both high and low.

• Bull markets are built on a foundation of distrust, climb a wall of worry, and peak on a mountain of greed and indifference to risk.

• Bear markets begin with denial, cascade through fear and panic, and bottom at a point of despair and contempt.

The critical takeaway is that psychological sentiment is a contra-indicator. Extreme optimism often signals a market top, while extreme pessimism often signals a market bottom. Therefore, successful investing is less about predicting the precise turning points and more about cultivating the emotional discipline to act contrary to the prevailing mood of the crowd—to be cautious when others are greedy, and to be strategically optimistic when others are fearful. The cycle doesn't provide a perfect timing tool, but it offers a powerful lens through which to understand market dynamics and one's own psychological biases.

Also read:

https://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2010/01/how-does-investor-psychology-affect.html

Thinking Fast & Slow. Cognitive biases that trick us. How Loss Aversion harm your long-term returns?

Loss Aversion

This is one of the most powerful concepts in behavioral economics. "It hurts more to lose $X than it feels good to gain $X." This leads to irrational behaviors, such as:

• Holding onto losing stocks for too long (hoping to "break even" to avoid realizing the loss).

• Selling winning stocks too early (to "lock in" the gain and avoid the risk of losing it).

Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow

The core idea of the book is that our thinking is governed by two systems:

• System 1: Fast, automatic, intuitive, and emotional.

• System 2: Slow, deliberate, analytical, and effortful.

The text highlights how System 1, while efficient, is prone to systematic errors (biases) that significantly impact our judgment, especially in complex areas like investing.

---

Summary of the Main Points

The notes outline several key cognitive biases from System 1 that lead to flawed decision-making:

1. Cognitive Ease: We prefer information that is easy to process, which can make us accept familiar or simple statements without critical analysis.

2. Priming Effect: Our thoughts and behaviors can be subtly influenced by unrelated stimuli we've been exposed to previously.

3. Anchoring Effect: We rely too heavily on the first piece of information we receive (the "anchor") when making decisions.

4. Hindsight Bias: After an event has occurred, we tend to believe we "knew it all along," oversimplifying the causes and underestimating the uncertainty that existed beforehand.

5. Loss Aversion: The pain of losing is psychologically about twice as powerful as the pleasure of gaining an equivalent amount. We strongly prefer avoiding losses to acquiring gains.

---

Expanded Discussion and Explanation

Here is a clearer breakdown of each concept, explaining how they "trick" us.

1. The Two Systems: The Foundation

• System 1 (Fast Thinking): This is your gut reaction. It operates automatically and quickly, with little or no effort. It's responsible for reading emotions on someone's face, driving a car on an empty road, or knowing that 2 + 2 = 4. While essential for daily life, it often jumps to conclusions based on patterns and shortcuts (heuristics).

• System 2 (Slow Thinking): This is your deliberate, analytical mind. It's mobilized for complex tasks that require focus, like solving a difficult math problem, filling out a tax form, or comparing two products in detail. It's lazy and often defers to System 1 unless specifically engaged.

The Trick: Because System 2 is effortful, we often rely on the quicker, but error-prone, System 1 for decisions that would benefit from more careful thought.

2. Why System 1 Tricks Us: Key Biases

A. Cognitive Ease
This is a state where your brain is on cruise control. When something feels familiar, simple, or easy to process, System 1 gives it a "stamp of approval." This makes you more likely to believe a statement simply because it's repeated, well-presented, or rhymes. The text's line, "You can’t detect a statement of the time," hints at this—we often accept information without verifying it when we're in a state of cognitive ease.

B. Priming Effect
Your recent experiences unconsciously influence your current thoughts and actions. The example given is excellent: if a store plays French music, you might be primed to buy French wine. You're not consciously aware of the influence, but System 1 is guided by these subtle cues.

C. Anchoring Effect
When making estimates or decisions, we give disproportionate weight to the first number we hear. The investing example is clear: if you receive an initial price target for a stock (STSB), that number becomes an "anchor." All subsequent analysis and price judgments are made in relation to that anchor ("your recommendation follows this set to get a new form code after that will be compared to STSB"). This can skew your valuation significantly.

D. Hindsight Bias (The "I-knew-it-all-along" Effect)
This bias rewrites our memory. After an event (like a stock market crash or a successful product launch), it seems to have been inevitable. The text captures this perfectly: "Looking back at it, it looked like the only problem where... But it wasn’t." This is dangerous because it prevents us from learning from past mistakes. If we think we knew what was going to happen, we don't analyze the actual, uncertain factors that were present at the time.

E. Loss Aversion
This is one of the most powerful concepts in behavioral economics. "It hurts more to lose $X than it feels good to gain $X." This leads to irrational behaviors, such as:

• Holding onto losing stocks for too long (hoping to "break even" to avoid realizing the loss).

• Selling winning stocks too early (to "lock in" the gain and avoid the risk of losing it).

---

How It Affects Our Investing (Synthesis)

The application to investing is direct and critical:

• Anchoring Effect can cause you to hold onto a stock because you're anchored to the price you bought it at, ignoring new, negative information.

• Hindsight Bias can make you overconfident. If you believe you predicted the last market move, you'll be less cautious about the next one, which is inherently unpredictable.

• Loss Aversion is the enemy of a disciplined investment strategy. It causes you to make emotionally-driven decisions—panic selling in a downturn or being too conservative to enter the market—that harm long-term returns.

• Cognitive Ease might lead you to invest in a well-known, popular company without doing your own deep research (System 2 analysis) simply because the name is familiar.

Conclusion

The notes from Thinking, Fast and Slow serve as a crucial warning: our intuitive mind, while a powerful tool, is riddled with biases that are particularly detrimental in the high-stakes, uncertain world of investing. To become a better decision-maker and investor, you must learn to recognize these biases and consciously engage your slow, analytical System 2 to question your initial instincts, analyze data objectively, and make more rational choices.

The Joys of Compounding. It's a simple mathematical reality: earnings generate their own earnings.

 

This is a fantastic summary of a powerful philosophy. "The Joys of Compounding" is not just an investment strategy; it's a complete worldview for building a rich life in every sense of the word.

Let's expand, discuss, and impress upon this knowledge, focusing on growing net worth and wealth.

The Core Principle: The Eighth Wonder of the World

Compounding is often called the eighth wonder of the world. At its heart, it's a simple mathematical reality: earnings generate their own earnings. It starts slowly, almost imperceptibly, but over time, the curve turns exponential and the growth becomes explosive.

• In Finance: A single dollar invested at a 10% annual return becomes $1.10 after one year. In year two, you earn 10% on $1.10, becoming $1.21. The extra penny is compounding at work. After 30 years, that dollar becomes $17.45. Not from adding more money, but from the relentless passage of time acting on the growing base.

• The Key Variable is Time. This is why starting early is the most powerful financial decision one can make. A person who invests for 10 years and then stops will often end up with more than someone who starts later and invests for 25 years, because the early starter's money has more time to work.

Expanding the Concept: Beyond Money

The genius of the "Joys of Compounding" philosophy, as highlighted by Feroldi and Baid, is its application to intangible assets:

1. Knowledge: When you read daily, you connect new ideas to old ones. These connections form a latticework of mental models. Over time, you don't just have more facts; you develop wisdom—the ability to see patterns, invert problems, and make better decisions in uncertainty. One book informs the next, creating a compound effect on your understanding.

2. Character & Relationships: Every time you act with integrity, you deposit trust into your "character account." This compounds into a reputation that opens doors and creates opportunities. Similarly, investing time in a few deep, genuine relationships builds a network of support and trust that pays dividends for a lifetime.

3. Habits: Good habits (like daily exercise, focused work, saving) are small, positive feedback loops. Doing them once does little. Doing them consistently for years compounds into extraordinary health, career success, and financial security.

Behaviors That Capture the Power of Compounding

These are the actions that place you firmly on the upward-sloping exponential curve.

• Start Early and Be Consistent: This is non-negotiable. Even small amounts, invested regularly, become staggering sums over decades. Automate your investments.

• Embrace a Long-Term Mindset: This is your "edge" over professional traders. You are not competing for quarterly returns. You are a gardener planting oak trees, expecting to enjoy the shade in 30 years. This mindset allows you to ignore short-term market noise.

• Read Voraciously and Reflect: As the image states, "Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body." Dedicate time each day to learning about businesses, history, psychology, and human behavior. This compounds your decision-making ability.

• Cultivate Patience and Inaction: "Doing nothing is often the most profitable action." Once you own a collection of wonderful businesses (or a low-cost index fund), the hardest but most crucial work is often to hold. Avoid the temptation to tinker. Let the businesses you own compound in value.

• Focus on Quality: "Study quality businesses." Invest in companies with wide moats, capable management, and the ability to reinvest profits at high rates of return. A high-quality asset compounds its value more reliably and efficiently than a speculative one.

• Protect Your Capital at All Costs: The "Margin of Safety" is paramount. One major loss can destroy years of compounding. By avoiding ruinous risks (e.g., over-leveraging, chasing fads), you ensure the compounding process is never interrupted.

Behaviors That Destroy the Power of Compounding

These are the actions that interrupt the process, flatten the curve, or worse, send it into a downward spiral.

• Impatience and Frequent Trading: This is the #1 killer. Every time you sell, you reset the compounding clock for that capital. Trading incurs fees, taxes, and the high likelihood of selling a good asset right before its major growth phase. It turns the powerful magic of compounding into a simple, zero-sum arithmetic game.

• Chasing "Hot Tips" and Speculating: Speculation focuses on price movements, not underlying value. It ignores the margin of safety and is akin to gambling. It destroys capital and prevents the steady, reliable growth that compounding requires.

• Succumbing to Fear and Greed (Market Timing): Selling in a panic during a market crash locks in permanent losses. Buying into a mania at peak prices ensures low or negative returns for years. Both behaviors stem from focusing on short-term outcomes rather than the long-term process.

• Interrupting the Process: The biggest financial mistake is not a bad investment; it's stopping the contributions or, worse, withdrawing the capital for non-essential consumption. This is like a farmer digging up his seeds to see if they're growing.

• Ignoring the Compounding of Bad Habits: Just as good habits compound positively, bad ones compound negatively. Procrastination, laziness, a negative mindset, or dishonest behavior erodes your personal capital—your knowledge, character, and relationships—with the same relentless power.

Conclusion: A Lifelong Pursuit

"The Joys of Compounding" is a call to shift your focus from the frantic pursuit of more to the patient cultivation of enough. It teaches that true wealth is built silently in the background while you live your life, provided you have the discipline to set the process in motion and the temperament to not interrupt it.

The most powerful behavior is to start now. Start investing whatever you can. Start reading for 20 minutes a day. Start acting with integrity in every small interaction. The clock is ticking, and time is the most valuable asset you have. Use it wisely, and let its compounding power work its magic on your capital, your mind, and your character.

Additional note:

Charlie Munger

The greatest harm you can do to your wealth, is to interrupt its compounding by not being able to sit still.

Buy with a margin of safety

https://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2025/11/you-must-buy-at-price-that-provides.html

A Reasonable Price (Margin of Safety):

This is where many investors fail. You must buy at a price that provides a "margin of safety"—a buffer in case your analysis is slightly wrong. Here are some rough guidelines:

A truly great business: maybe 20-25 times earnings.

A good business: 12-15 times earnings.

A mediocre business: 8-10 times earnings (but you should probably avoid these).