To highlight fundamental differences between companies, examine each company's historical record, growth rates, cash flows and other financial data.
Based on these fundamental differences, assign it to one of eight groups. These stock types are:
Here is a quick overview of these very different companies.
Speculative Growth: Yahoo YHOO. The premier Internet portal has become one of the giants of the online world in 1999, with an audience in the tens of millions. It has become consistently profitable, unlike most of its online brethren, but its track record is still so short that it is definitely risky.
Aggressive Growth: Starbucks SBUX. The coffee chain has grown like gangbusters while also showing a healthy profit, the two most important characteristics of an aggressive growth stock.
Classic Growth: McDonalds MCD. the fast-food giant is a stereotypical classic growth stock: A well-known name with an established track record. It's growing steadily, but not as fast as speculative growth or aggressive growth companies.
Slow Growth: Procter & Gamble PG. The consumer-products giant is a good example of this type; its growth is slower than that of even classic-growth companies, but it makes up for this lack of growth with high profitability.
High Yield: Philip Morris MO. The food and tobacco giant's stock was hammered in 1999, but the company still gives back much of its enormous cash flow to shareholders in the form of a hefty dividend.
Cyclicals: United Technologies UTX. This industrial conglomerate is a great example of a cyclical stock. Its business - aerospace equipment, air conditioners, and elevators - are highly sensitive to the performance of the general economy.
Hard Assets: Barrick Gold ABX. This company is one of the most consistently profitable gold-mining stocks, but it also illustrates many of the charcteristics unique to companies that sell hard assets such as minerals or oil.
Distressed: Silicon Graphics SGI. This maker of computer workstations and server systems was once a hot technology stock, but it has suffered through a lot of problems since the mid-1990s and has seen its stock price tank.
Based on these fundamental differences, assign it to one of eight groups. These stock types are:
- Speculative Growth
- Aggressive Growth
- Classic Growth
- Slow Growth
- High Yield
- Cyclicals
- Hard Assets
- Distressed.
Here is a quick overview of these very different companies.
Speculative Growth: Yahoo YHOO. The premier Internet portal has become one of the giants of the online world in 1999, with an audience in the tens of millions. It has become consistently profitable, unlike most of its online brethren, but its track record is still so short that it is definitely risky.
Aggressive Growth: Starbucks SBUX. The coffee chain has grown like gangbusters while also showing a healthy profit, the two most important characteristics of an aggressive growth stock.
Classic Growth: McDonalds MCD. the fast-food giant is a stereotypical classic growth stock: A well-known name with an established track record. It's growing steadily, but not as fast as speculative growth or aggressive growth companies.
Slow Growth: Procter & Gamble PG. The consumer-products giant is a good example of this type; its growth is slower than that of even classic-growth companies, but it makes up for this lack of growth with high profitability.
High Yield: Philip Morris MO. The food and tobacco giant's stock was hammered in 1999, but the company still gives back much of its enormous cash flow to shareholders in the form of a hefty dividend.
Cyclicals: United Technologies UTX. This industrial conglomerate is a great example of a cyclical stock. Its business - aerospace equipment, air conditioners, and elevators - are highly sensitive to the performance of the general economy.
Hard Assets: Barrick Gold ABX. This company is one of the most consistently profitable gold-mining stocks, but it also illustrates many of the charcteristics unique to companies that sell hard assets such as minerals or oil.
Distressed: Silicon Graphics SGI. This maker of computer workstations and server systems was once a hot technology stock, but it has suffered through a lot of problems since the mid-1990s and has seen its stock price tank.
No comments:
Post a Comment