Sunday, 10 May 2026

Good Management

**Good Management**:


## Disciplined Stewards of Capital

- Patient and disciplined – invest in organic growth, resist “transformational” (often value-destroying) acquisitions.

- Prudent balance sheets and counter‑cyclical investment (e.g., H&M accelerated store roll‑outs during downturns to secure cheaper rents; Svenska Handelsbanken expanded UK branches after 2008 while rivals were weak).


## Independent, Long‑Term, and Tenacious

- **Independent thinking** – act on prudent conviction despite consensus. Example: Handelsbanken used no banker bonuses, decentralized structure, risk aversion → survived 2008 and supplied capital.

- **Long‑term vision & tenacity** – Rolls‑Royce’s Trent engines and TotalCare service: short‑term critics, but long‑term shareholders gained enormously.

- **Never satisfied** – relentless improvement, pre‑empt threats. Example: Atlas Copco set up its own low‑end compressor business in China to learn from and outflank local competitors.


## Out of the Limelight

- Be wary of “celebrity CEOs”. Research (Malmendier & Tate) shows award‑winning CEOs subsequently underperform, spend more time on public activities, and have higher earnings management.

- Prefer executives who keep a low profile, though rare exceptions (e.g., Ryanair’s O’Leary) use fame for free advertising.


## People Matter

- Top priority: develop and deploy talent.

- Corporate cultures that produce great managers: GE, IBM, Atlas Copco (e.g., four Atlas Copco alumni led Alfa Laval, ASSA ABLOY, Munters, Wärtsilä).

- Atlas Copco rotates executives every three years to give multiple perspectives.


## Candor

- Straightforward, honest communication – no PR spin or political evasion.

- Visible in reports, meetings, and earnings calls.


## A Note of Caution (The Halo Effect)

- Success does not always reflect outstanding management; failure does not always reflect poor management.

- Rosenzweig’s *The Halo Effect*: we infer brilliant strategy, visionary CEO, etc. when performance is good, and the opposite when performance falters – but many factors (especially industry structure) are larger drivers.

- Assessing managerial quality is worthwhile, but not overrated.

No comments: