Wednesday, 7 March 2012

Fraser & Neave Holdings Berhad (At a Glance)








Announcement
Date
Financial
Yr. End
QtrPeriod EndRevenue
RM '000
Profit/Lost
RM'000
EPSAmended
03-Feb-1230-Sep-12131-Dec-11743,29841,74611.60-
04-Nov-1130-Sep-11430-Sep-11995,46266,20718.44-
05-Aug-1130-Sep-11330-Jun-11882,47577,85121.70-
05-May-1130-Sep-11231-Mar-111,009,468131,98836.80-




Stock Performance Chart for Fraser & Neave Holdings Berhad

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Be a Buffett, don't back the benchmark

Be a Buffett, don't back the benchmark
Warren Buffett’s latest letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders is the usual mixture of folksy charm and investment wisdom.


A woman displays playing cards for sale with a picture of Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett in Omaha.
A playing card featuring a picture of Warren Buffett. The investor has beaten the S&P 500 index 39 years out of 47 Photo: Reuters
The part that grabbed the headlines this year was a comparison of equity investing against bonds and gold, which unsurprisingly came down on the side of shares. Having achieved a 19.8pc annual growth rate from stocks over 47 years, it is not hard to see why they should be Buffett’s first love.
For me, there was a more interesting lesson in this year’s letter. It was a thought prompted by its first page on which Buffett compares his performance year by year since 1965 against the S&P 500 index. Last year, the 4.6pc rise in the value of Berkshire Hathaway’s book value compared with 2.1pc growth in the main US benchmark.
It was the 39th year out of 47 in which he has beaten the market, a fantastically consistent performance. But then, as Buffett says, “if our gain over time outstrips the performance of the S&P 500, we have earned our paychecks. If it doesn’t, we are overpaid at any price.”
So once a year, and cumulatively over the half century he has run Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett compares his progress against the S&P 500. It is a convenient benchmark to see if he is earning his corn and, in that regard, he is no different from any other fund manager.
In another important way, however, Buffett is quite different from the majority of professional investors. This is because, although he cares about his overall performance compared with the benchmark, he is indifferent to how his portfolio of investments compares with the make-up of the S&P 500. He is, to use the jargon, unconstrained by the benchmark.
Buffett’s approach is simply to buy companies that he believes are undervalued compared with their intrinsic value and hold them for the very long term. If you think that most investors do something similar you may be disappointed. That is because the fund management industry has increasingly lashed itself to the mast of stock market indices. Its buy and sell decisions are to a greater or lesser extent determined not by the intrinsic merits of individual shares but by their weighting within a relevant price-derived benchmark.
It is an approach which more thoughtful investors believe may not necessarily be in the best interests of their customers. It has led to funds having heavy concentrations in small numbers of very large companies or in particular sectors that dominate and, as such, it may be seen as a significant contributor to the stock market’s booms and busts.
Investment approaches that measure their performance against price-related indices almost by definition encourage the purchase of overvalued shares that have been pushed above fair value. This is a particular problem with passive funds like index trackers but, to the extent that actively-managed funds have become “closet trackers”, it means they too risk being sucked in at the top of the market, contributing to moments of madness like the dot.com bubble a decade or so ago.
What is increasingly happening in the institutional investment world in response to these concerns is a move to alternative indices that try to take the price of a share out of the equation. These new indices focus on different measures such as a company’s sales, the value of its assets, even the size of its workforce. Alternatively, they simply measure themselves against an equally-weighted benchmark, one with a similar exposure to every company in an index. In both cases, there is evidence that these approaches outperform market value-based indices in the long run.
So why doesn’t everyone simply invest according to this new “fundamental” approach? The main reason is that the alternative methods have a tendency to solve one problem but create a new one. For example, equally weighting all the companies in an index gives a fund a relatively greater exposure to small companies. There will be times when this is an advantage and times when it leads to under-performance.
As a consequence of this, some active fund managers are testing a move back towards the unconstrained Buffett approach, freeing up their investors to back their best ideas regardless of a benchmark. Some might say that is what they are paid to do.
Tom Stevenson is an investment director at Fidelity Worldwide Investment. The views expressed are his own.
He tweets at @tomstevenson63.

Tongher (At a Glance)


6.3.2012
Tongher
Income Statement
31/12/2011 31/12/2010 Absolute Chg Change
Revenue 601.05 344.28 256.77 74.58%
Gross Profit 71.79 38.691 33.10 85.55%
Operating Profit 0.00 #DIV/0!
Financing costs -0.583 -0.146 -0.44 299.32%
PBT 48.591 36.167 12.42 34.35%
PAT 47.585 31.746 15.84 49.89%
EPS (basic) sen 29.04 19.93 9.11 45.71%
Balance Sheet
NCA 202.074 184.129 17.95 9.75%
CA 347.325 326.49 20.84 6.38%
Total Assets 549.399 510.619 38.78 7.59%
Total Equity 400.604 367.243 33.36 9.08%
NCL 8.735 6.384 2.35 36.83%
CL 140.06 136.992 3.07 2.24%
Total Liabilities 148.795 143.376 5.42 3.78%
Total Eq + Liab 549.399 510.619 38.78 7.59%
Net assets per share 2.520 2.310 0.21 9.09%
Cash & Eq 87.408 76.014 11.39 14.99%
LT Borrowings 3.025 0.029 3.00 10331.03%
ST Borrowings 120.781 108.485 12.30 11.33%
Net Cash -36.398 -32.5 -3.90 11.99%
Inventories 195.402 185.033 10.37 5.60%
Trade receivables 61.414 55.297 6.12 11.06%
Trade payables 17.972 27.897 -9.93 -35.58%
Quick Ratio 1.08 1.03 0.05 5.05%
Current Ratio 2.48 2.38 0.10 4.05%
Cash flow statement
PBT 48.591 36.167 12.42 34.35%
OPBCWC 73.066 39.732 33.33 83.90%
Cash from Operations 45.921 -38.795 84.72 -218.37%
Net CFO 44.364 -40.115 84.48 -210.59%
CFI -32.670 -93.292 60.62 -64.98%
CFF 0.164 54.174 -54.01 -99.70%
Capex -35.927 -7.166 -28.76 401.35%
FCF 8.437 -47.281 55.72 -117.84%
Dividends paid -7.639 -6.370 -1.27 19.92%
DPS (sen) 8.00 5.00 3.00 59.95%
No of ord shares (m) 127.253 127.361 -0.11 -0.08%
Financial Ratios
Gross Profit Margin 11.94% 11.24% 0.71% 6.28%
Net Profit Margin 7.92% 9.22% -1.30% -14.14%
Asset Turnover 1.09 0.67 0.42 62.26%
Financial Leverage 1.37 1.39 -0.02 -1.37%
ROA 8.66% 6.22% 2.44% 39.31%
ROC 10.89% 7.94% 2.95% 37.11%
ROE 11.88% 8.64% 3.23% 37.41%
Valuation 6.3.2012 4.3.2011
Price  2.37 2.57 -0.20 -7.78%
Market cap (m) 301.59 327.32 -25.73 -7.86%
P/E 6.34 10.31 -3.97 -38.53%
P/BV 0.75 0.89 -0.14 -15.53%
P/FCF 35.75 -6.92 42.67 -616.35%
P/Div 39.48 51.38 -11.90 -23.17%
DPO ratio 0.16 0.20 -0.04 -20.00%
EY 15.78% 9.70% 6.08% 62.68%
FCF/P 2.80% -14.44% 17.24% -119.37%
DY 2.53% 1.95% 0.59% 30.15%




Stock Performance Chart for Tong Herr Resources Berhad

Padini (At a Glance)


6.3.2012
Padini
Income Statement
30/6/2011 30/6/2010 Absolute Chg       Change
Revenue 568.48 518.84 49.64 9.57%
Gross Profit 290.80 259.28 31.52 12.16%
Operating Profit 106.63 87.374 19.26 22.04%
Financing costs -1.573 -1.094 -0.48 43.78%
PBT 105.057 86.28 18.78 21.76%
PAT 75.694 60.974 14.72 24.14%
EPS (basic) sen 11.51 9.27 2.24 24.16%
Balance Sheet
NCA 94.585 92.257 2.33 2.52%
CA 349.754 264.325 85.43 32.32%
Total Assets 444.339 356.582 87.76 24.61%
Total Equity 282.677 234.332 48.35 20.63%
NCL 23.715 10.899 12.82 117.59%
CL 137.947 111.351 26.60 23.88%
Total Liabilities 161.662 122.25 39.41 32.24%
Total Eq + Liab 444.339 356.582 87.76 24.61%
Net assets per share 0.430 0.356 0.07 20.63%
Cash & Eq 138.622 135.025 3.60 2.66%
LT Borrowings 22.151 10.125 12.03 118.78%
ST Borrowings 24.948 26.128 -1.18 -4.52%
Net Cash 91.523 98.772 -7.25 -7.34%
Inventories 170.955 76.554 94.40 123.31%
Trade receivables 39.433 32.561 6.87 21.11%
Trade payables 93.94 58.62 35.32 60.25%
Quick Ratio 1.30 1.69 -0.39 -23.14%
Current Ratio 2.54 2.37 0.16 6.81%
Cash flow statement
PBT 105.057 86.280 18.78 21.76%
OPBCWC 129.019 111.207 17.81 16.02%
Cash from Operations 60.017 137.997 -77.98 -56.51%
Net CFO -2.104 93.513 -95.62 -102.25%
CFI -2.276 -26.351 24.08 -91.36%
CFF 8.773 3.084 5.69 184.47%
Capex -24.728 -25.690 0.96 -3.74%
FCF -26.832 67.823 -94.66 -139.56%
Dividends paid -26.316 -29.606 3.29 -11.11%
DPS (sen) 4.00 4.50 -0.50 -11.11%
No of ord shares (m) 657.91 657.91 0.00 0.00%
Financial Ratios
Net Profit Margin 13.32% 11.75% 1.56% 13.30%
Asset Turnover 1.28 1.46 -0.18 -12.07%
Financial Leverage 1.57 1.52 0.05 3.30%
ROA 17.04% 17.10% -0.06% -0.38%
ROC 39.60% 44.98% -5.38% -11.96%
ROE 26.78% 26.02% 0.76% 2.91%
Valuation 6.3.2012 4.3.2011
Price  1.53 1.09 0.44 40.37%
Market cap (m) 1006.60 717.12 289.48 40.37%
P/E 13.30 11.76 1.54 13.07%
P/BV 3.56 3.06 0.50 16.36%
P/FCF -37.51 10.57 -48.09 -454.80%
P/Div 38.25 24.22 14.03 57.92%
DPO ratio 0.35 0.49 -0.14 -28.40%
EY 7.52% 8.50% -0.98% -11.56%
FCF/P -2.67% 9.46% -12.12% -128.18%
DY 2.61% 4.13% -1.51% -36.67%








Announcement
Date
Financial
Yr. End
QtrPeriod EndRevenue
RM '000
Profit/Lost
RM'000
EPSAmended
29-Nov-1130-Jun-12130-Sep-11178,11526,9464.10-
26-Aug-1130-Jun-11430-Jun-11132,14618,0762.75-
30-May-1130-Jun-11331-Mar-11147,96024,3863.71-
25-Feb-1130-Jun-11231-Dec-10141,81414,4842.20-


ttm-EPS  12.76 sen
Price  RM 1.53
PE (ttm)  12x

Stock Performance Chart for Padini Holdings Berhad

Dutch Lady: How do you value this stock?


Dutch Lady


FYE 31st Dec
Qtr  Year Revenue Earnings  EPS Div NAV ttm-EPS ROE
Q4 2011 211.404 28.37 44.33 37.5 4.05 168.88 41.70%
Q3 2011 201.708 23.6 36.87 35 3.98 141.48 35.55%
Q2 2011 200.892 27.775 43.4 0 3.61 125.43 34.75%
Q1 2011 196.643 28.338 44.28 0 3.53 111.59 31.61%
Q4 2010 156.768 10.835 16.93 37.5 3.09 99.83 32.31%
Q3 2010 183.619 13.822 20.82 35 3.27 107.98 33.02%
Q2 2010 185.784 18.918 29.56 0 3.07 118.74 38.68%
Q1 2010 170.454 20.812 32.52 0 3.14 113.23 36.06%
Q4 2009 169.521 16.048 25.08 57.19 2.81 94.39 33.59%
Q3 2009 177.129 20.21 31.58 8.44
Q2 2009 176.631 15.389 24.05 0
Q1 2009 168.566 8.753 13.68 0








Dutch Lady 31/12/2011 31/12/2010 Absolute Chg Change
Revenue 810.65 696.63 114.02 16.37%
Gross Profit 304.47 248.664 55.81 22.44%
Operating Profit 139.372 89.221 50.15 56.21%
Financing costs -0.919 0 -0.92 #DIV/0!
PBT 141.553 90.104 51.45 57.10%
PAT 108.082 63.887 44.20 69.18%
EPS (basic) sen 168.88 99.82 69.06 69.18%
NCA 74.048 73.246 0.80 1.09%
CA 324.465 234.244 90.22 38.52%
Total Assets 398.513 307.49 91.02 29.60%
Total Equity 259.154 197.472 61.68 31.24%
NCL 4.051 3.757 0.29 7.83%
CL 135.308 106.261 29.05 27.34%
Total Liabilities 139.359 110.018 29.34 26.67%
Total Eq + Liab 398.513 307.49 91.02 29.60%
Net assets per share 4.05 3.09 0.96 31.07%
Cash & Eq 193.143 85.657 107.49 125.48%
LT Borrowings 0 0 0.00 #DIV/0!
ST Borrowings 0 0 0.00 #DIV/0!
Net Cash 193.143 85.657 107.49 125.48%
Inventories 93.448 72.722 20.73 28.50%
Trade receivables 36.713 75.176 -38.46 -51.16%
Trade payables 121.831 99.638 22.19 22.27%
Current Ratio 2.40 2.20 0.19 8.78%
PBT 141.553 90.104 51.45 57.10%
OPBCWC 0.00 #DIV/0!
Cash from Operations 188.290 123.391 64.90 52.60%
Net CFO 161.940 98.389 63.55 64.59%
CFI -7.135 -8.064 0.93 -11.52%
CFF -47.319 -46.400 -0.92 1.98%
Capex -10.882 -9.089 -1.79 19.73%
FCF 151.058 89.300 61.76 69.16%
Dividends paid -46.400 -46.400 0.00 0.00%
DPS (sen) 72.5 72.5 0.00 0.00%
No of ord shares (m) 64 64 0.00 0.00%
Financial Ratios
Net Profit Margin 13.33% 9.17% 0.04 45.38%
Asset Turnover 2.03 2.27 -0.23 -10.21%
Financial Leverage 1.54 1.56 -0.02 -1.24%
ROA 27.12% 20.78% 0.06 30.54%
ROC 163.73% 57.14% 1.07 186.57%
ROE 41.71% 32.35% 0.09 28.91%
Valuation 5.3.2012 5.3.2011
Price  29.5 17.38 12.12 69.74%
Market cap (m) 1888.00 1112.32 775.68 69.74%
P/E 17.47 17.41 0.06 0.33%
P/BV 7.29 5.63 1.65 29.34%
P/FCF 12.50 12.46 0.04 0.34%
P/Div 40.69 23.97 16.72 69.74%
DPO ratio 0.43 0.73 -0.30 -40.89%
EY 5.72% 5.74% 0.00 -0.33%
FCF/P 8.00% 8.03% 0.00 -0.34%
DY 2.46% 4.17% -0.02 -41.08%


The price of Dutch Lady was RM 29.50 on 5.3.2012.  Its price a year ago, on 5.3.2011 was RM 17.38.  However, look at their  PEs.  Today, Dutch Lady is trading at PE of 17.47 while it was trading at PE of 17.41 a year ago.  :-)