Friday, 14 November 2025

Market drops: A 2% drop (normal fluctuation), a 10% drop (market correction), a 20% drop (bear market) and a 40% drop (severe bear market or a crash)

Summary:

How frequent are these drops?

2% drop:  common

10% drop:  one every 2 years

20% drop:  one every 5 years

40% drop:  one every 25 years



A 2% drop is a normal fluctuation within a healthy market, not a crisis. Acting on emotion is the single biggest mistake an investor can make.


A 10% drop, officially considered a "market correction," is a different beast entirely from a 2% dip. It's sharper, more painful, and the sense of panic is palpable. 

Since 1950, the S&P 500 has experienced a correction of 10% or more over 40 times. That's roughly one every two years. It's a normal, albeit unpleasant, part of investing. Every single one of them, to date, has been followed by a recovery and a new high.

A 10% correction is a test of your financial plan and your emotional fortitude. For a well-prepared investor, it's an expected part of the journey and can even be an opportunity. For the unprepared, it's a crisis. Your response should be dictated by your plan, not by the screaming headlines.


A 20% drop, officially crossing into "Bear Market" territory, is a profound psychological and financial event. The sense of fear is pervasive, and the "this time is different" narrative feels overwhelmingly convincing.

More common than most people think. Bear markets are a regular, though painful, feature of the investing landscape.

  • Frequency: Since World War II, there have been 14 bear markets (defined as a 20% or greater drop from peak to trough) in the S&P 500.

  • That's roughly one every 5-6 years. They are an inevitable part of the market cycle, not a bizarre anomaly.

  • Duration & Severity: On average, these bear markets last about 14 months and see a peak-to-trough decline of roughly 33%.

  • The Crucial Context: Recovery is the Norm. While painful, every single one of these bear markets has eventually been followed by a new all-time high. The bull markets that follow are, on average, much longer and stronger, lasting about 6 years with an average gain of over 160%.

  • The key takeaway: A 20% drop is a severe but normal event. It feels like the end of the world, but history shows it is a valley on the long-term path upward.



A 40% drop is a catastrophic event in the financial markets, known as a severe bear market or even a crash. These events are rare, but they are seared into the collective memory of investors because of the immense financial and psychological damage they cause.  

In the modern history of the U.S. stock market (primarily using the S&P 500 and its predecessor indices as a benchmark), a peak-to-trough decline of 40% or more has occurred only a handful of times.

Since 1900, there have been five such devastating declines:

  1. The Great Depression (1929-1932): The mother of all market crashes. The stock market plummeted nearly 90% at its worst point. A 40% drop was passed early on in a long, terrifying slide.

    • Cause: A speculative bubble, a banking crisis, and catastrophic economic policy (protectionist tariffs, monetary contraction).

    • Recovery Time: It took until 1954 for the market to regain its 1929 peak—over 25 years.

  2. The 1937-1938 "Recession within a Depression": After a partial recovery from the lows of 1932, the market experienced another sharp drop of about -60% from its 1937 peak.

    • Cause: Premature fiscal and monetary tightening by the government and the Federal Reserve.

    • Recovery Time: The market did not sustainably exceed its 1937 peak until the post-WWII boom in the late 1940s.

  3. The 1973-1974 Bear Market: A brutal, grinding bear market where the S&P 500 fell -48%.

    • Cause: The OPEC oil embargo, skyrocketing inflation ("stagflation"), and the collapse of the "Nifty Fifty" blue-chip stocks.

    • Recovery Time: It took 7.5 years for the market to reach a new inflation-adjusted high in 1982.

  4. The 2000-2002 Dot-Com Crash: After the implosion of the tech bubble, the S&P 500 fell -49%.

    • Cause: Speculative mania in internet and technology stocks with no earnings, followed by a severe recession and the 9/11 attacks.

    • Recovery Time: The S&P 500 reached a new nominal high in 2007, but when adjusted for inflation, it did not fully recover until 2013.

  5. The 2007-2009 Financial Crisis: The S&P 500 plunged -57% at its nadir.

    • Cause: A housing bubble, a crisis in subprime mortgages, and a resulting global financial system meltdown.

    • Recovery Time: The S&P 500 reached a new nominal high in 2013, about 5.5 years after the peak.

Tencent Q3 2025 income statement

Tencent's Q3 2025 income statement compared to the previous quarter and the same period last year.

Tencent Condensed Consolidated Income Statement






















Key Takeaways:

  • Top-Line Growth: Revenue grew 15% year-over-year.

  • Bottom-Line Surge: Profit for shareholders grew 19% YoY.

  • EPS Outperformance: EPS grew 21% YoY, boosted by share buybacks.

  • High Profitability: Gross margin expanded significantly, and operating margin remained strong.


Conclusion

Tencent's Q3 2025 earnings report is overwhelmingly positive and exceeds expectations. It confirms that the strategic shifts towards efficiency, high-margin businesses, and capital returns are paying off handsomely. The company is firing on all cylinders, showing robust growth, expanding profitability, and delivering superior returns to shareholders.




Tencent's wealth comes from two powerful engines:

  1. Operational Engine (Retained Earnings): Adds ~RMB 73 billion through selling services and products.

  2. Investment Engine (Other Reserves): Adds ~RMB 112 billion through the rising market value of its strategic investments.

This highlights a critical aspect of Tencent: it is not just a technology operating company; it is also a massive and highly successful investment fund. The performance of its investment portfolio has a direct and substantial impact on its overall equity and book value.


Tencent Key Cash Flow Metrics (9M 2025)

(RMB in millions, Estimated)

Line ItemAmount (RMB)Calculation / Source
Net Earnings (Profit for the Period)~130,000Sum of Q2 (56,044) and Q3 (64,943) Profit; Q1 estimated.
+ Depreciation & Amortization~25,000Non-cash add-back from income statement adjustments.
+ Other Non-Cash Adjustments~25,000Share-based comp, gains/losses from investments, etc.
= Operating Cash Flow (Pre-Working Capital)~180,000
- Change in Working Capital~(+10,000)Net effect of A/R (use), A/P (source), Deferred Revenue (source).
= Net Cash From Operating Activities~152,340Primary cash generated from core business.
- Capital Expenditures (CapEx)~(76,610)Increase in PP&E (60,278) + Intangible Assets (16,332).
= Free Cash Flow (FCF)~75,730Cash available for investors after reinvesting in the business.
- Dividends Paid~(25,000)Estimated cash outlay for shareholder dividends.
= Free Cash Flow after Dividends~50,730Cash remaining for share buybacks, M&A, or adding to the balance sheet.

Key Takeaways from this Top-Down View:

  1. Strong Core Profitability: The starting point of ~RMB 130 billion in net earnings shows a highly profitable core business.

  2. High-Quality Earnings: The addition of ~RMB 50 billion in non-cash items (D&A, share-based comp) indicates that earnings are heavily backed by actual cash generation.

  3. Efficient Operations: The net change in working capital was a source of cash, meaning Tencent's operations are so powerful that it collects from customers and defers payments to suppliers more than it ties up cash in growing receivables and inventory.

  4. Significant Reinvestment: The CapEx of RMB 76.6 billion is massive and confirms Tencent is in a heavy investment cycle, likely for AI and cloud infrastructure.

  5. Substantial Free Cash Flow: Despite huge reinvestment, the company still generated an estimated FCF of ~RMB 76 billion, demonstrating the immense scale of its cash machine.

  6. Shareholder Returns: The company returns a significant portion of its FCF to shareholders, with an estimated RMB 25 billion in dividends, leaving plenty for its ongoing share buyback program.n dividends, leaving plenty for its ongoing share buyback program.



How Often Has the Stock Market Fallen 40% or More? A handful of times.

A 40% drop is a catastrophic event in the financial markets, known as a severe bear market or even a crash. These events are rare, but they are seared into the collective memory of investors because of the immense financial and psychological damage they cause.

Here’s a breakdown of how often it has happened and the historical context.

How Often Has the Stock Market Fallen 40% or More?

In the modern history of the U.S. stock market (primarily using the S&P 500 and its predecessor indices as a benchmark), a peak-to-trough decline of 40% or more has occurred only a handful of times.

Since 1900, there have been five such devastating declines:

  1. The Great Depression (1929-1932): The mother of all market crashes. The stock market plummeted nearly 90% at its worst point. A 40% drop was passed early on in a long, terrifying slide.

    • Cause: A speculative bubble, a banking crisis, and catastrophic economic policy (protectionist tariffs, monetary contraction).

    • Recovery Time: It took until 1954 for the market to regain its 1929 peak—over 25 years.

  2. The 1937-1938 "Recession within a Depression": After a partial recovery from the lows of 1932, the market experienced another sharp drop of about -60% from its 1937 peak.

    • Cause: Premature fiscal and monetary tightening by the government and the Federal Reserve.

    • Recovery Time: The market did not sustainably exceed its 1937 peak until the post-WWII boom in the late 1940s.

  3. The 1973-1974 Bear Market: A brutal, grinding bear market where the S&P 500 fell -48%.

    • Cause: The OPEC oil embargo, skyrocketing inflation ("stagflation"), and the collapse of the "Nifty Fifty" blue-chip stocks.

    • Recovery Time: It took 7.5 years for the market to reach a new inflation-adjusted high in 1982.

  4. The 2000-2002 Dot-Com Crash: After the implosion of the tech bubble, the S&P 500 fell -49%.

    • Cause: Speculative mania in internet and technology stocks with no earnings, followed by a severe recession and the 9/11 attacks.

    • Recovery Time: The S&P 500 reached a new nominal high in 2007, but when adjusted for inflation, it did not fully recover until 2013.

  5. The 2007-2009 Financial Crisis: The S&P 500 plunged -57% at its nadir.

    • Cause: A housing bubble, a crisis in subprime mortgages, and a resulting global financial system meltdown.

    • Recovery Time: The S&P 500 reached a new nominal high in 2013, about 5.5 years after the peak.


Comments:

In 1973, I remembered the OPEC oil embargo and the stagflation it caused to the economy of the UK.  No knowledge of the impact on the stock market, but did noted the prices of properties dropped a lot.  Bank interest rates were sky high (> 10%) at one stage as the central bankers tried to reign in inflation.  Lesson learned:  despite the high interest rate, your cash actually lost value due to the high inflation.

I witnessed the October 1987 crash.  Still remembered the exact day as I happened to be with a stock broker, who lamented how this was going to affect the whole industry severely.  Just started my career and had not invested in the market then.  But it was educational watching the market crashed and rose rather quickly.  However, the impact on the stockbroking industry was real for those who were part of it.

My first stock was bought in 1993.  How intelligent was I in my investing?  On hindsight, I was not intelligent at all.   My buying and selling was based on tips, rumours, greed and fear.  I was very lucky to have an experienced investor who recommended me to buy certain counters and because I believe and know his ability and knowledge, I followed with his recommendations with little hesitation.  His briefing to me on the stock was often a less than 2 minutes brief.  "I think you should look into buying some of this company.  It is doing this and that.  It is a good company and its results have been this and that.  It also gives good dividends."  

Well, I did build up a portfolio of stocks.   Hardly look at the portfolio, as I was far too busy with my more important work.  It was fun seeing the portfolio value rose with the bull market of that time.  By 1994 or 1995, I felt something wasn't right.   Here I was working so hard to make a living but my customers and friends were all having a gala good time being rewarded by the stock market.  Teachers left their job to do multilevel marketing, as there were so much easy money there.  Accountants wanted to join as stockbrokers and there was a queue to be accepted.  House prices were up.  Economic activities were hot.  You couldn't be admitted to a hospital in Klang Valley, as the private hospitals ran out of bed space.  Restaurants were packed.  Employment was full and there was shortage of labour in many industries.  Many offices placed TV in their workplace to watch the teletext.   A speculator boasted for many months how he invested in the morning, and by the afternoon, he made RM 5,000.  Funnily, these observations made me uneasy.  Though I did not sell, I felt things were not right and I actually held back on my investing from 1995, observing the market going up and up over the next 2 years by the side-line.  How did I feel?  Having lunch with colleagues, and hearing them making money in stocks and you know you should know your risk tolerance and financial capacity.  Cash built up in the banks during that stage.  I just shut out the noise and the hypes as I felt the market was just too high.  Did I know how to value stocks at that time?  Not really.  Just a hunch only.

On the fateful day in October 1997, I was at a meeting overseas.  The conversation among the attendees focused on what was the start of the Asian Financial Crisis.  The Thai bath had fallen in value by a huge amount.   Malaysia was not affected yet.   Little did we realise Malaysia would be affected soon.   The Malaysian ringgit was soon affected.  Its stock market crashed too.  I was actually elated as I was cash rich and ready to pounce.  So many great stocks were sold down.  Yet, on hindsight, I was lucky but one of my pick did show up as poor.  One of the stock I picked was a stockbroking company.  But this was so cheap then.  Anyway, this company eventually recovered and it was a gain overall.  The Asian Financial Crisis was a very valuable lesson in my investing journey.   With money in the game, my portfolio which had gains turned into losses.  Did you examine your feelings then?   Why did not I sell the stocks?  Market was falling and yet the stocks were not sold?  Should have sold early, but the prices had already dropped?  So and so, a friend, had sold all and was totally out of the market, but the prices were already low.  Another shared after holding on for a while that she and her husband sold all their stocks and were now sitting sideline to get in later.  They sold at the lowest and a few years later when the market had recovered, they were still not invested.  In December 1997, I was in US for a holiday.  The exchange rate of US1 to MYR 2.20 had crashed to US 1 to MYR 3.50.   Suddenly, you felt everything was more expensive.  Luckily, the trip was booked before the crash occurred.

What would you have done?  A newbie in the stock market, now sitting with losses in his portfolio.   I discussed with my wife that perhaps we shouldn't be in the stock market at all.  It is too dangerous.  I did plough in more money into the market during the market crash.  What I did not know was the market at 600 could drop further.  Having not lived through a crash, losing money elicited various feelings.   Investing can be emotional, and ability to reign in your emotions is part of intelligent investing.   

I lived through the 2000-2002 Dot-Com Crash unscathed, as I was not in the US market then.  Internet was not so accessible then.  What changed in 2000?   During the Dot-Com boom, Warren Buffett was criticized for having lost his touch.  Post Dot-Com crash, he became a big hero.  Value investing became popular again.   I am a voracious reader of books. I spent at least a thousand and more on books every year.  Prior to 2000, I was probably reading the wrong books.  I read books on personal finance, economics and accounting.  There were interesting but not very helpful in investing.   Post 2000, investing books started to flood our local bookstores.  I probably have collected all the books that are interesting in investing in my library.  Also, internet was more accessible and you can learn a lot about investing in the internet too.   This consolidated my investing knowledge but can I translate this into practice.  

In 2002, I did a thorough analysis of my existing portfolio from 1993.   From 1997, after the Asian Financial Crisis, I had lived with the fact that I was carrying a loss in my portfolio of stocks.  I hardly sell my stocks as they were all very good companies.   Surprisingly, the majority of the stocks had recovered from the low and many were above my buying price.  Also, those that have recovered but still below my  buying price (capital loss), when the dividends received were added, the dividends added to my buying price of that stock!   Surprised by this revelation, I studied the portfolio to learn the valuable lessons it offered.  There were many valuable lessons learned.  This rewired my thinking, approach and feeling to owning stocks in the market for the long term.  This maybe also partly influenced by the book Stock for the Long Run by Siegel.     

Feeling confident, after discussing with my wife, we got a "tip" on a stock and I analysed this stock and bought.  Alas, the stock went up 100% and a few months later, I actually lost 50%.  This was another road-stop sign.  I told my wife that we should not buy any stocks again until I know what I am doing.'   The story is too long, and I shall stop here for now.  :-)

Thursday, 6 November 2025

The Magnificent 7 Stocks (10 years Revenues and Net Earnings records)

 The "Magnificent Seven" are the leading, prominent tech companies in the world: Apple, Alphabet, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. How these stocks perform typically dictates how well the overall market does.

NVIDIA's Revenue and Net Earnings (FY2015 - FY2026E)

Here is a detailed breakdown of NVIDIA's revenues and net earnings for the fiscal years 2015 to 2026, followed by a summary of the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR).


**Important Note on Fiscal Years:** NVIDIA's fiscal year (FY) ends in January. For example, **Fiscal Year 2026** will end on January 25, 2026. The data below is for these fiscal years. The figures for FY2015-FY2025 are from official annual reports, while FY2026 is based on the current consensus analyst estimates.


---


### **NVIDIA's Revenue and Net Earnings (FY2015 - FY2026E)**


All figures are in USD millions. Data for FY2015-FY2025 is sourced from NVIDIA's official annual reports (10-K filings). **Data for FY2026 is based on the current consensus analyst estimates.**


| Fiscal Year | Revenue ($ millions) | Net Earnings ($ millions) |

| :---------- | :------------------- | :------------------------- |

| **FY2015**  | $4,682               | $631                       |

| **FY2016**  | $5,010               | $614                       |

| **FY2017**  | $6,910               | $1,666                     |

| **FY2018**  | $9,714               | $3,047                     |

| **FY2019**  | $11,716              | $4,141                     |

| **FY2020**  | $10,918              | $2,796                     |

| **FY2021**  | $16,675              | $4,332                     |

| **FY2022**  | $26,974              | $9,752                     |

| **FY2023**  | $26,974              | $4,368                     |

| **FY2024**  | $60,922              | $29,760                    |

| **FY2025**  | $110,185             | $58,913                    |

| **FY2026 (Est.)**| ~$143,500         | ~$76,500                   |


**Key Context for the Data:**

*   **FY2017-FY2019: The Gaming and Early AI Era.** Strong growth was driven by the rise of gaming (GeForce GPUs) and the initial adoption of AI and datacenter solutions.

*   **FY2020: The Cyclical Dip.** A decrease was caused by a post-crypto hangover and macroeconomic headwinds.

*   **FY2021-FY2022: The AI Boom Begins.** Explosive growth started, fueled by the datacenter business and the broadening AI boom.

*   **FY2023: The Inventory Correction.** Revenue was flat, and earnings fell due to inventory corrections and a slowdown in gaming demand.

*   **FY2024-FY2025: The AI Hypergrowth.** Monumental years driven by global demand for NVIDIA's AI GPUs (H100, Blackwell).

*   **FY2026 (Est.): Sustained AI Dominance.** Analysts project another year of robust growth as the Blackwell product cycle hits full stride and demand for AI infrastructure continues to outpace supply, though at a slightly moderated pace from the hyper-growth of FY2025.


---


### **Summary of CAGR (2015 to 2026E)**


The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is the mean annual growth rate over a specified period.


**Period:** From the end of **Fiscal Year 2015** to the end of **estimated Fiscal Year 2026** (an 11-year period).


*   **Revenue CAGR (FY2015 to FY2026E):**

    *   Starting Value (FY2015): $4,682 million

    *   Ending Value (FY2026E): ~$143,500 million

    *   Number of Years: 11

    *   **CAGR = ~36.3%**


*   **Net Earnings CAGR (FY2015 to FY2026E):**

    *   Starting Value (FY2015): $631 million

    *   Ending Value (FY2026E): ~$76,500 million

    *   Number of Years: 11

    *   **CAGR = ~53.5%**


### **Conclusion**


Over the eleven-year period from FY2015 to the projected FY2026, NVIDIA's financial performance is arguably one of the most dramatic in the history of modern capitalism. The company has successfully pivoted from being a leader in PC gaming to becoming the indispensable infrastructure provider for the AI era.


*   The **Revenue CAGR of approximately 36.3%** over more than a decade is virtually unprecedented for a company reaching this scale, highlighting its continuous ability to create and dominate new, massive markets for accelerated computing.

*   The **Net Earnings CAGR of ~53.5%** is even more spectacular, demonstrating not just top-line growth but also immense operating leverage and a powerful shift towards a high-margin business model centered on cutting-edge AI data center platforms.


The projected growth for FY2026 suggests that NVIDIA's dominance is far from over. The company is expected to continue its strong performance as the AI market expands, solidifying this period as a definitive case study in capturing a technological paradigm shift.


***Disclaimer:*** *This information is for illustrative purposes only. Data for FY2015-FY2025 is historical. Data for FY2026 are analyst estimates and are not guaranteed. This is not financial advice. Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.*