Saturday 23 October 2010

What does this comparison mean when it comes to non-dividend stocks?

"I believe non-dividend stocks aren’t much more than baseball cards. They are worth what you can convince someone to pay for them."
–Mark Cuban, Billionaire businessman

Based on what you learned about dividends, why are non-dividend stocks compared to baseball cards?
i don’t know how to answer that.. please help!


wertyu_24 5:02 pm on October 22, 2010 Permalink

With non-dividend stocks, you never get a share in the company’s profits. The only benefit you might see from a non-dividend stock is a voting right, but besides that, the value of the stock will only grow with the value of the company.

For dividend paying companies, stocks are usually valued using the dividend payout, so no dividend equals no value. It will only have intrinsic value, like baseball cards.


Read more: What does this comparison mean when it comes to non-dividend stocks?

http://investing.hirby.com/what-does-this-comparison-mean-when-it-comes-to-non-dividend-stocks/

No comments: