In 2012 the S&P 500 reported a 13% return, much better than some other stock markets in the world. And investors are proving to be perpetually optimistic, forecasting the market will do surprisingly well in 2013, as well.
Goldman Sachs’ equity strategy team released a list of stocks with the most upside given Goldman analysts’ price targets. The 40 stocks on the list offer 24% to 44% upside.
The list offers a large number of energy companies, which isn’t surprising given the fact that investors are looking to get in on America’s move toward energy independence.
Here, we’ve pulled five health-related stocks for your consideration.
(Stocks listed in alphabetical order)
Alexion Pharmaceuticals
Symbol: ALXN
Current Price: $96.80
Upside to target: 28%
A pharmaceutical company looking to develop cures for severe, life-threatening and rare diseases.
Edwards Lifesciences
Symbol: EW
Current Price: $91.79
Upside to target: 24.2%
The company designs, manufactures and markets tissue heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring devices.
PerkinElmer
Symbol: PKI
Current Price: $33.08
Upside to target: 26%
A leader in human and environmental health, offering therapeutic and disease research, prenatal screening, environmental testing and industrial monitoring.
Prudential Financial
Symbol: PRU
Current Price: $56.15
Upside to target: 36.9%
A financial services and insurance firm offering life insurance and long-term care insurance.
Stryker Corp.
Symbol: SYK
Current Price: $56.65
Upside to target: 24%
A medical device and equipment manufacturer specializing in orthopedic medical technology.
Read the full list here
Keep INVESTING Simple and Safe (KISS) ****Investment Philosophy, Strategy and various Valuation Methods**** The same forces that bring risk into investing in the stock market also make possible the large gains many investors enjoy. It’s true that the fluctuations in the market make for losses as well as gains but if you have a proven strategy and stick with it over the long term you will be a winner!****Warren Buffett: Rule No. 1 - Never lose money. Rule No. 2 - Never forget Rule No. 1.
Sunday, 31 March 2013
Anatomy of the Forex Market (Graphic)
Source http://www.pepperstone.com/
By Instruments
Foreign exchange swaps – $1,8 trillion – 45%
Spot – $1,5 trillion – 37,5%
Outright forwards – $475 billions – 11,9%
Currency options – $207 billions – 5,2%
Currency swap – $43 billions – 1%
Foreign exchange swaps – $1,8 trillion – 45%
Spot – $1,5 trillion – 37,5%
Outright forwards – $475 billions – 11,9%
Currency options – $207 billions – 5,2%
Currency swap – $43 billions – 1%
By Counterparties
with other financial institutions (hedge funds, pension funds, central banks) – $1,9 trillion – 47,7%
with bank dealers – $1,5 trillion – 37,5%
with non-financial customers (corporations and governance) – $533 billions – 13,4%
private traders – $60 billions – 1,5%
with other financial institutions (hedge funds, pension funds, central banks) – $1,9 trillion – 47,7%
with bank dealers – $1,5 trillion – 37,5%
with non-financial customers (corporations and governance) – $533 billions – 13,4%
private traders – $60 billions – 1,5%
Friday, 29 March 2013
Invest In Quality Not Quantity
June 15, 2012
Strangely enough, most investors commit a very basic mistake when they make investments. They choose quantity over quality. Psychologically, people find it very appealing to own 10,000 shares of a $1 stock versus 100 shares of a $100 stock. All the while, investors fail to forget that the size of pizza hasn't changed - it's merely 100 slices or 10,000 slices. The painful reality is that by choosing quantity over quality, the lack of quality increases the risk assumed, leading investors to sell at the first sign of trouble.
Keep It Simple
Warren Buffett, perhaps the world's most successful investor, has a unique ability to make very sophisticated investments that have created great value for his holding company Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A, BRK.B). Yet as Buffett will tell you, the most successful investments that created the greatest value for Berkshire were those where Buffett chose quality over quantity. Buffett made a huge investment in Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) in the 1980s. The cost of that investment was roughly $1.3 billion. Today, that stake is worth around $14 billion. What that gain does not reflect are the dividends that Berkshire has received each year from its ownership in Coke. Berkshire owns about 9% of Coke's shares.
In 2011, Coke paid out $4.3 billion in dividends, $360 million of which went to Berkshire. Berkshire's biggest stock investments have been heavy on quality, as Buffett deeply values intangibles like brands, market leadership and durable businesses.
Boring Is Quality
At the end of the day, stock prices anchor on earnings growth. The highest quality companies are those with consistent records of profitability. Exciting industries can be profitable, but they invite lots of competition, which ultimately serves to erode profitability. Boring businesses don't invite competition and as such, can generally be counted on for generating consistent profits at an acceptable rate of growth. WD-40 (Nasdaq:WDFC) is a great example. The company makes a boring product that has been in use for decades.
However, the profits for WD-40 are anything but boring. Investors can count on around a 2.5% dividend yield each year. Same idea with The Hershey Company (NYSE:HSY). Candy doesn't change much and there is no fear of technology risk in chocolate. And people will always eat a little (maybe a lot) of candy. Therefore, it's no surprise that HSY has a return on equity (ROE) that would excite anyone: an ROE in excess of 70%. In today's zero percent interest rate environment, the 2.3% dividend is oh so sweet.
The Bottom Line
Investing benefits those who are patient and harms those who seek excitement. The passage of time allows for compounding to go to work, which is the greatest value creating force in investing. Investing in quality should be a starting point for all investors.
Warren Buffett, perhaps the world's most successful investor, has a unique ability to make very sophisticated investments that have created great value for his holding company Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A, BRK.B). Yet as Buffett will tell you, the most successful investments that created the greatest value for Berkshire were those where Buffett chose quality over quantity. Buffett made a huge investment in Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) in the 1980s. The cost of that investment was roughly $1.3 billion. Today, that stake is worth around $14 billion. What that gain does not reflect are the dividends that Berkshire has received each year from its ownership in Coke. Berkshire owns about 9% of Coke's shares.
At the end of the day, stock prices anchor on earnings growth. The highest quality companies are those with consistent records of profitability. Exciting industries can be profitable, but they invite lots of competition, which ultimately serves to erode profitability. Boring businesses don't invite competition and as such, can generally be counted on for generating consistent profits at an acceptable rate of growth. WD-40 (Nasdaq:WDFC) is a great example. The company makes a boring product that has been in use for decades.
Investing benefits those who are patient and harms those who seek excitement. The passage of time allows for compounding to go to work, which is the greatest value creating force in investing. Investing in quality should be a starting point for all investors.
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/2012/invest-in-quality-not-quantity-brk.a-ko-wdfc-hsy0615.aspx
GOLDMAN: These Are The 40 Most Undervalued Stocks In The Market
Lucas Kawa | Jan. 4, 2013, 6:22 PM |
For 2013, Goldman Sachs' equity strategy team expects the index to hit 1,575 by year-end.
However, they expect some stocks to do better than others.
The firm's recently released "US Monthly Chartbook" includes a list of stocks with the most upside opportunity relative to Goldman analysts' price targets.
Many of these companies highlighted are either in energy production or energy equipment.
The stocks listed offer 24 to 44 percent upside relative to their current prices. We've arranged the stocks from least to most upside.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/goldman-sachs-40-stocks-with-upside-2013-1?op=1#ixzz2OsOX1l7b
Undervalued Health Stocks
Laura Joszt
Published: Monday, January 7th 2013
Buffett And Goldman Sachs Do Sweetheart Deal
Buffett And Goldman Sachs Do Sweetheart Deal
Tickers in this Article » BRKB, GS, WFC, IBM, KO, AXP, SPY
Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) announced March 26 that in October it will issue to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) exactly the number of shares equal to Warren Buffett's profit from the 2008 warrants he got as part of his $5 billion investment in the investment bank. The deal is a win/win for both companies. What does it mean for stockholders?
Deal History
Think back to September 23, 2008, when the two parties made their original deal. Goldman Sach's stock was trading at $125.05, 24% less than just three weeks earlier. Its reputation in question after the collapse of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, investors were skeptical about most investment banks. Warren Buffett rode in on his big white horse providing Goldman Sachs with the reputational shot in the arm it needed. Berkshire Hathaway bought $5 billion in perpetual preferred shares that paid a 10% dividend.
As part of the deal it received warrants giving it the right to purchase 43.5 million shares of Goldman stock at $115 each anytime up to October 1, 2013.
Goldman was paying $500 million in dividends annually on the preferred shares--an untenable amount--so it bought back the shares for $5.5 billion plus a special, one-time dividend of $1.64 billion. What happens next depends on what Goldman's stock does between now and October 1. For example, should the 10 trading days prior to October 1 average $150 per share, Berkshire Hathaway's profit would be $1.52 billion, meaning it would receive 10.15 million shares of Goldman Sachs. Buffett ends up with approximately 2% of the investment bank and a $2.14 billion profit while Goldman reduces its potential dilution by 77%.
Shareholders
Regardless of what happens to Goldman's stock price over the next six months you have to consider Berkshire Hathaway shareholders are the big winners. Its annualized total return from the deal over the last five years is 11.6%. That's 180 basis points higher than the SPDR S&P 500 (ARCA:SPY). But of course that's not the final tally. Should Buffett hang on to its stock perhaps even building a larger position, then it could become the gift that keeps on giving. Time will tell how enthusiastic he is about owning Goldman but clearly it's not red hot because if it were he'd force the issue and buy the 43.5 million shares outright at $115 each. If I had to guess I'd say it will become one of the billion-dollar holdings we read about in every Berkshire Hathaway annual report but not one of his big four - Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), IBM (NYSE:IBM), Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and American Express (NYSE:AXP).
As for Goldman Sachs, it gains a partner and loses a quasi-lender. It was an expensive deal for the company but one that probably needed to be done. By coming up with a creative solution, Goldman Sachs reduces its dilution by 33 million shares and Berkshire Hathaway reduces its cash outlay by $5 billion, which it can now put toward one of those "elephant" deals Buffett always speaks of. If Berkshire had to buy all 43.5 million shares in order to crystalize its profit, it's very possible the company could have sold its entire investment. This way Buffett stays in the game which is good news for Goldman Sachs shareholders.
Bottom Line
Warren Buffett didn't get to where he is by being stupid. In Goldman, he's acquired a piece of one of banking's biggest and well known firms. Even better, Berkshire Hathaway was paid $2.15 billion over five years to do so. Anytime someone offers to pay you to acquire something they own, especially when it has real value, the answer should always be yes.
If you're a Berkshire Hathaway shareholder this is just another example why you already own its stock. If you're a Goldman Sachs shareholder, and have been for some time, this is the end of a very difficult time in the company's history. Would I own either stock? I'd have no problem owning Berkshire Hathaway. As for Goldman Sachs, I'd consider its stock but only if Buffett remains a shareholder.
http://www.investopedia.com/stock-analysis/032713/buffett-and-goldman-sachs-do-sweetheart-deal-brkb-gs-wfc-ibm-ko-axp-spy.aspx?utm_source=coattail-buffett&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=WBW-03/28/2013
Thursday, 28 March 2013
Philip Fisher’s Investment Philosophy
•Philip
Fisher’s Investment Philosophy
•Introduction
•The late Phil Fisher was
one of the great investors of all time and the author of the classic book Common
Stocks
and Uncommon Profits.
•Introduction
•Fisher started his money
management firm, Fisher & Co., in 1931 and over the next seven decades made
tremendous amounts of money for his clients.
•Introduction
•For example, he was an
early investor in semiconductor giant
Texas Instruments TXN.
•Fisher also purchased Motorola
MOT in 1955, and in a
testament to long-term investing, held the stock until
his death in 2004.
•Introduction
•"Common
Stocks and Uncommon Profits" - is a MUST READ!
•Fisher's Investment Philosophy
•Fisher's investment philosophy
can be summarized in a single sentence: Purchase
and hold for the long term a concentrated portfolio of outstanding
companies with compelling growth
prospects that you understand very
well.
•Fisher's Investment Philosophy
•This sentence is clear on
its face, but let us parse it carefully to understand the advantages of Fisher's
approach.
•Fisher's Investment Philosophy
•The question that every
investor faces is, of course, WHAT
to buy? - and - WHEN to buy it?
•Fisher's answer is to purchase
the shares of superbly managed growth companies, and he devoted an
entire chapter in Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits to this topic.
•Fisher's Investment Philosophy
•The chapter begins with a
comparison of "statistical
bargains,"
or stocks that appear cheap based solely on accounting figures, and growth
stocks, or stocks with
excellent growth prospects based on an intelligent appraisal of the underlying
business's characteristics.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy –
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
•The problem with
statistical bargains, Fisher noted, is that while there may be some
genuine bargains to
be found, in many cases the businesses face
daunting headwinds that cannot be discerned from accounting figures, such that
in a few years the current "bargain" prices will have proved to be
very high.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy –
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
•Furthermore, Fisher stated that
over a period of many years, a well-selected
growth stock will substantially outperform a
statistical bargain.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy –
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
The Problem with Statistical Bargains
•The reason
for this disparity,
Fisher wrote, is that a growth stock, whose intrinsic value grows steadily over
time, will tend to appreciate
"hundreds of per cent each decade," while it is unusual for a statistical bargain to be
"as much as 50 per cent undervalued.”
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•Fisher divided the universe
of growth stocks into large and small
companies.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•On one end of the
spectrum are large financially strong companies with solid growth prospects.
•At the time, these
included IBM (IBM), Dow Chemical (DOW), and DuPont (DD), all of which increased
fivefold in the 10-year period from 1946 to 1956.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•Although such returns are
quite satisfactory, the real home runs
are to be found in "small and frequently young
companies...
[with] products that might bring a sensational future.”
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•Of these companies,
Fisher wrote, "the young growth stock offers by far the greatest
possibility of gain.
•Sometimes this can mount
up to several thousand per cent in a decade.”
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•Fisher's answer to the
question of what to buy is clear:
•All else equal, investors with
the time and inclination should concentrate their
efforts on uncovering young
companies with outstanding growth
prospects.
•Fisher’s
Investment Philosophy – The Universe of Growth Stocks
•Remember - much has changed -
therefore YOU must integrate "today's" Economics and Financial
Markets in with Mr. Fisher's Philosophy!
•Fisher's
15 Points
•All good principles are
timeless, and Fisher's famous
"Fifteen Points to Look for in a Common Stock" from Common
Stocks and Uncommon Profits remain as relevant today as when they were first
published.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•The 15 points are a qualitative
guide to finding
superbly managed companies with excellent growth
prospects.
•According to Fisher, a company must
qualify on most of these 15 points to be considered a worthwhile investment:
•Fisher's
15 Points
•1. Does
the company have products or services with sufficient market potential to make
possible a sizable increase in sales for at least several years?
•A company seeking a
sustained period of spectacular growth must have products
that address large and expanding markets.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•2. Does
the management have a determination to continue to develop products or
processes that will still further increase total sales potentials when the
growth potentials of currently attractive product lines have largely been
exploited?
•All markets eventually
mature, and to maintain
above-average growth over a period of decades, a company must continually
develop new products to either expand existing markets or enter new ones.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•3. How
effective are the company's research-and-development efforts in relation to its
size?
•To develop new products,
a company's research-and-development (R&D) effort must be both
efficient and effective.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•4. Does
the company have an above-average sales organization?
•Fisher wrote that in a competitive
environment, few products or
services are so compelling that they will sell to their maximum
potential without
expert merchandising.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•5. Does
the company have a worthwhile profit margin?
•Berkshire Hathaway's (BRK.B)
vice-chairman Charlie Munger is fond of saying that
if something is not worth doing, it is not worth doing well. Similarly, a company
can show tremendous growth, but the growth must bring
worthwhile profits to reward investors.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•6. What
is the company doing to maintain or improve profit margins?
•Fisher stated, "It is
not the profit margin of the past but those of the future that are basically
important to the investor." Because inflation increases a company's
expenses and competitors will pressure profit margins, you should pay
attention to a company's strategy for reducing costs and improving profit
margins over the long haul. This is where the moat framework can be a big help.
•Fisher's
15 Points
•7. Does
the company have outstanding labor and personnel relations?
•According to Fisher, a company with
good labor relations tends to be more profitable than one with
mediocre relations because happy employees are
likely to be more productive. There is no single yardstick to measure the state of a
company's labor relations, but there are a few items investors should
investigate. First, companies with good labor relations usually make
every effort to settle employee grievances quickly. In addition, a
company that makes above-average profits, even while paying above-average wages
to its employees is likely to have good labor relations. Finally, investors
should pay attention to the attitude of top management toward
employees.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•8. Does
the company have outstanding executive relations?
•Just as having good
employee relations is important, a company must also cultivate the
right atmosphere in its executive suite. Fisher
noted that in companies where the founding family retains control, family
members should not be promoted ahead of more able
executives. In addition, executive salaries
should be at least in line with industry norms. Salaries should
also be reviewed regularly so that merited pay increases
are given without having to be demanded.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•9. Does
the company have depth to its management?
•As a company continues
to grow over a span of decades, it is vital that a deep pool of
management talent be properly developed. Fisher warned investors to avoid companies where
top management is reluctant to delegate significant authority to lower-level
managers.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•10. How
good are the company's cost analysis and accounting controls?
•A company cannot
deliver outstanding results over the long term if it is unable to
closely track costs in each step of its operations. Fisher stated that
getting a precise handle on a company's cost analysis is difficult, but an
investor can discern which companies are exceptionally deficient--these are the
companies to avoid.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•11. Are
there other aspects of the business, somewhat peculiar to the industry
involved, which will give the investor important clues as to how outstanding
the company may be in relation to its competition?
•Fisher described this point
as a catch-all because the "important
clues" will vary widely among industries. The skill with which
a retailer, like Wal-Mart (WMT) or Costco (COST), handles
its merchandising and inventory is of paramount importance. However, in an
industry such as insurance, a completely different
set of business factors is important. It is critical for an investor to understand
which industry factors determine the success of a company and how that company
stacks up in relation to its rivals.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•12. Does
the company have a short-range or long-range outlook in regard to profits?
•Fisher argued that investors
should take a long-range view, and thus should favor companies that take a long-range
view on profits. In addition, companies focused on
meeting Wall Street's quarterly earnings estimates may forgo beneficial
long-term actions if
they cause a short-term hit to earnings. Even worse, management may be tempted
to make aggressive accounting assumptions in order to
report an acceptable quarterly profit number.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•13. In
the foreseeable future will the growth of the company require sufficient equity
financing so that the larger number of shares then outstanding will largely
cancel the existing stockholders' benefit from this anticipated growth?
•As an investor, you
should seek companies with sufficient cash or borrowing
capacity to fund growth without diluting the interests of its current owners with follow-on equity
offerings.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•14. Does
management talk freely to investors about its affairs when things are going
well but "clam up" when troubles and disappointments occur?
•Every business, no matter
how wonderful, will occasionally face disappointments. Investors should seek
out management that reports candidly to shareholders all aspects of the
business, good or bad.
•Fisher's 15 Points
•15. Does
the company have a management of unquestionable integrity?
•The accounting scandals
that led to the bankruptcies of Enron and WorldCom should highlight the
importance of investing only with management teams of unquestionable integrity.
Investors will be
well-served by following Fisher's warning that regardless of how
highly a company rates on the other 14 points, "If there is a serious
question of the lack of a strong management sense of trusteeship for
shareholders, the investor should never seriously consider participating in
such an enterprise.”
•Important
Don'ts for Investors
•In investing, the
actions you don't take are as important as the actions you do
take.
•Here is some of Fisher's
advice on what you should not do.
•Important
Don'ts for Investors
•1.
Don't overstress diversification.
•2.
Don't follow the crowd.
•3.
Don't quibble over eighths and quarters.
•
•
•
•1.
Don't overstress diversification.
•Investment advisors and the
financial media constantly expound the virtues of diversification with the help
of a catchy cliché: "Don't put all your eggs in one basket."
•However, as Fisher noted,
once you start putting your eggs in a multitude of baskets, not
all of them end up in attractive places, and it becomes difficult to keep
track of all your eggs.
•1.
Don't overstress diversification.
•Fisher, who owned at most
only 30 stocks at any point in his career, had a better solution.
•Spend
time thoroughly researching and understanding a company,
and if it clearly
meets the 15 points he set forth, you should make a meaningful
investment.
•1.
Don't overstress diversification.
•Fisher would agree with Mark
Twain when he said, "Put all your
eggs in one basket, and watch that basket!”
•2.
Don't follow the crowd.
•Following
the crowds into investment fads, such as the
"Nifty Fifty" in the early 1970s or tech stocks in the late 1990s,
can be dangerous to your financial health.
•2.
Don't follow the crowd.
•On the flip side, searching
in areas the crowd has left behind can be extremely profitable.
•2.
Don't follow the crowd.
•Sir Isaac Newton once
lamented that he could calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the
madness of crowds. Fisher would heartily agree.
•3.
Don't quibble over eighths and quarters.
•After extensive research,
you've found a company that you think will prosper in the decades ahead, and
the stock is currently selling at a reasonable price.
•Should
you delay or forgo your investment to wait for a price a
few pennies below the current price?
•3.
Don't quibble over eighths and quarters.
•Fisher told the story of a
skilled investor who wanted to purchase shares in a particular company whose
stock closed that day at $35.50 per share.
•However, the investor
refused to pay more than $35.
•The stock never again sold at
$35 and over the next 25 years, increased in value to more than $500
per share.
•The
investor missed out on a tremendous gain in a vain
attempt to save 50 cents per share.
•3.
Don't quibble over eighths and quarters.
•Even Warren Buffett is
prone to this type of mental error.
•Buffett began purchasing
Wal-Mart many years ago, but stopped buying when the price moved up a little.
•Buffett admits that this
mistake cost Berkshire Hathaway shareholders about $10 billion.
•Even the Oracle of Omaha
could have benefited from Fisher's advice not
to quibble over eighths and quarters.
•The
Bottom Line
•Philip Fisher compiled a
sterling record during his seven-decade career by investing
in young companies with bright growth prospects.
•By applying Fisher's
methods, you, too, can uncover tomorrow's dominant companies.
•Q&A
•There is only one
correct answer to each question.
•Q&A
•Fisher was the author of
which classic investment book?
–Security Analysis.
–One Up on Wall
Street.
–Common Stocks and
Uncommon Profits.
•Q&A
•What sorts of companies
did Fisher favor?
–Young growth
companies.
–Companies with large
dividends.
–Companies in mature
industries.
•Q&A
•Fisher's time horizon for
holding a well-selected stock can best be described as what?
–Very long-term.
–Short-term.
–Three to five years.
•Q&A
•Which statement would
Fisher most agree with?
–"I don't want a
lot of good investments; I want a few outstanding ones."
–"It is important
to own a well-diversified portfolio of over 50 stocks to reduce risk."
–"Large
capitalization companies in mature and steady industries are the best
investments.”
•Q&A
•According to Fisher, management
quality:
–Is irrelevent so long as the
company is growing.
–Should cause you to
avoid a stock if there are serious stewardship issues.
–Should not delegate
to lower-level employees.
•
•http://www.safehaven.com/article/20772/investment-basics-course-505-wise-analysts-philip-fisher
•
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)