Is There An Opportunity With Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE:JNJ) 41% Undervaluation?

Comment:   

An example of using 2 stage growth model and discount cash flow method in valuing a company.

The discount cash flow method is based on 2 assumptions:   future cash flows and the applied discount rate.  

It is not an exact science.  One should you conservative assumptions in your valuation.

Charlie Munger mentioned that he had never seen Warren Buffett using the DCF method in his valuation.   There are better and easier ways to value a company.  Often you will know if a company is cheap or very expensive, even without having to do elaborate studies.   (An analogy is you do not need to know the weight to know that this person is overweight or obese or underweight.)  

Keep your valuation simple.  It is better to be approximately right than to be exactly wrong.

The article below shares how to do valuation in detail.

Happy investing.  

Mon, 4 March 2024 at 7:00 pm GMT+8·6-min read

Key Insights

• Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, Johnson & Johnson fair value estimate is US$275

• Johnson & Johnson is estimated to be 41% undervalued based on current share price of US$162

• Analyst price target for JNJ is US$174 which is 37% below our fair value estimate

Does the March share price for Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) reflect what it's really worth? Today, we will estimate the stock's intrinsic value by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. We will use the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model on this occasion. There's really not all that much to it, even though it might appear quite complex.

We generally believe that a company's value is the present value of all of the cash it will generate in the future. However, a DCF is just one valuation metric among many, and it is not without flaws. If you want to learn more about discounted cash flow, the rationale behind this calculation can be read in detail in the Simply Wall St analysis model.

Check out our latest analysis for Johnson & Johnson

What's The Estimated Valuation?

We're using the 2-stage growth model, which simply means we take in account two stages of company's growth. In the initial period the company may have a higher growth rate and the second stage is usually assumed to have a stable growth rate. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.

A DCF is all about the idea that a dollar in the future is less valuable than a dollar today, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today's dollars:

10-year free cash flow (FCF) estimate

	2024	2025	2026	2027	2028	2029	2030	2031	2032	2033
Levered FCF ($, Millions)	US$22.8b	US$23.9b	US$24.5b	US$25.0b	US$26.4b	US$27.2b	US$28.0b	US$28.7b	US$29.4b	US$30.2b
Growth Rate Estimate Source	Analyst x5	Analyst x6	Analyst x5	Analyst x3	Analyst x3	Est @ 2.99%	Est @ 2.78%	Est @ 2.63%	Est @ 2.53%	Est @ 2.46%
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 6.0%	US$21.5k	US$21.3k	US$20.6k	US$19.9k	US$19.8k	US$19.2k	US$18.6k	US$18.1k	US$17.5k	US$16.9k

("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$193b

We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.3%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 6.0%.

Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2033 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$30b× (1 + 2.3%) ÷ (6.0%– 2.3%) = US$838b

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$838b÷ ( 1 + 6.0%)10= US$469b

The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$663b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$162, the company appears quite good value at a 41% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent.

dcf

The Assumptions

The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Johnson & Johnson as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 6.0%, which is based on a levered beta of 0.800. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

SWOT Analysis for Johnson & Johnson

Strength

• Debt is not viewed as a risk.

• Dividends are covered by earnings and cash flows.

Weakness

• Earnings declined over the past year.

• Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Pharmaceuticals market.

Opportunity

• Annual earnings are forecast to grow for the next 3 years.

• Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value.

Threat

• Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the American market.

Next Steps:

Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it shouldn't be the only metric you look at when researching a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Preferably you'd apply different cases and assumptions and see how they would impact the company's valuation. For instance, if the terminal value growth rate is adjusted slightly, it can dramatically alter the overall result. What is the reason for the share price sitting below the intrinsic value? For Johnson & Johnson, there are three pertinent aspects you should consider:

1. Risks: Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Johnson & Johnson you should know about.

2. Future Earnings: How does JNJ's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.

3. Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered!

PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the NYSE every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here.

 editorial-team@simplywallst.com (Simply Wall St)

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/opportunity-johnson-johnsons-nyse-jnj-110049724.html

How are we going to figure out value? How can anyone? Do we have the answer yet?

Valuing a company you are investing into.

For simplicity, we will assume that the business in question will earn $10,000 each year for the next thirty-plus years.

Intuitively, we know that collecting $10,000 each year for the next thirty years is not the same as receiving all $300,000 today.  

Present value 

=  Annual Cash Flow / Discount rate

= $10,000 / 0.06 

= $166,667

(In reality, we should look for how much cash we receive from the business over its lifetime.  For the purposes in this post, we will assume that earnings are a good approximation for cash received.)

So, earning $10,000 a year for the next thirty-plus years turns out to be worth about $166,667 today.   

In practice, predicting so far into the future is pretty hard to do.  

You will probably pay less for those estimated earnings than if they were guaranteed.

How much less?  

That's not exactly clear, but we would certainly discount that hoped-for $10,000 by more than the 6% we used when the $10,000 was guaranteed - maybe we'd use a discount of 8% or 10% or 12%, or even more. (the amount of our discount would reflect in part how confident we were in our earnings estimate).  

Value of the Company

At 6% discount rate

$10,000 /0.06 = $166,667

At 8% discount rate

$10,000 / 0.08 = $125,000

At 12% discount rate

$10,000 / 0.12 = $ 83,333

As it turns out, using a 12% discount rate, the value of the company is only $83,000.  

What is crystal clear, however, is that using different discount rates for our estimated earnings can lead to wildly different results when we try to value a business.

Figuring out the right discount rate isn't our only problem, we also have to estimate earnings. 

Many businesses grow their earnings over time, while others due to competition, a bad product, or a poor business plan, see their earnings shrink or even disappear over the years.  

Let us see how funny the math gets when we try to value a business using not only different estimates for discount rates but we throw on top of that some different guesses for future earnings growth rates!

Value of the Business

At 4% growth rate, 8% discount rate

$10,000 / (0.08 - 0.04) = $250,000

At 4% growth rate, 12% discount rate

$10,000 / (0.12 - 0.04) = $125,000

At 6% growth rate, 8% discount rate

$10,000 / (0.08 - 0.06) = $500,000.

Annual Cash Flow / (Discount Rate - Growth Rate) = Present Value

According to finance theory and logic, the value of a business should equal the sum of all of the earnings that we expect to collect from that business over its lifetime (discounted back to a value in today's dollars based upon how long it will take us to collect those earnings and how risky we believe our estimates of future earnings to be).  

Will earnings grow at 2%, 4%, 6% or not at all?  Is the right discount rate 8%, 105, 12%, or some other number?   

The math says that small changes in estimated growth rates or discount rates or both can end up making huge differences in what value we come up with!

At 2% growth rate, 12% discount rate

$10,000 / (0.12 - 0.02) = $100,000

At 5% growth rate, 8% discount rate

$10,000 / (0.08 - 0.05) = $333,333

Annual Cash Flow / (Discount Rate - Growth Rate) = Present Value

Which numbers are right?

It is incredibly hard to know.  Whose estimates of earnings over the next thirty-plus years should we trust?  What discount rate is the right one to use?

The secret to successful investing is to figure out the value of something and then - pay a lot less.  

How are we going to figure out value?  How can anyone?  Do we have the answer yet?  Hopefully, we have learned some very valuable lessons even if we cannot answer them yet.

Absolute Valuation: Calculating the Intrinsic Value of a Business

Absolute Valuation (calculating Intrinsic Value)

In absolute valuation of a stock, the worth of a business is calculated.  This is the Intrinsic Value.

The Intrinsic Value can be estimated from various ways, the two common ones are::

• from the assets* the company owns, and the other,
• from its expected future cash flows (also known as the discount cash flow analysis).

Relative Valuation

Some common market ratios for valuations of stock are PE, EV/EBIT, EV/EBITA, P/B and P/S.  The problem is these are all based on price; comparing what an investor is paying for a stock to what he is paying for another stock.

Relative valuation does not tell you the Intrinsic Value (IV) of the stock.  Without knowing the IV, at least an estimated one, the investors do not really know what price should be paid for it. 



Absolute Valuation versus Relative Valuation

Comparing ratios across companies and across time can help us understand whether our valuation estimate is close to or far from the mark, but estimating the IV of a company gives us a better understanding of its value and hence the price we are willing to pay for it.

Having an estimated IV also helps us focus more on the value of the business, rather than the price of the stock which changes every minute on the screen.

It gives us a stronger basis for making investment decisions.



Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCFA)

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCFA) is a method of valuing the intrinsic value of a company.

DCFA tries to work out the value today, based on projections of all the cash it could make available to investors in the future.  

It is descried as "discounted" cash flow because of the principle of "time value of money" - that is, cash in the future is worth less than cash today.

DCFA starts with the premise that a stock's price should be equal to the sum of its current and future cash flows after taking the time value of money (discounted by an appropriate rate) into account. (John Burr Williams).

Stock Price IV 
= Sum of the Present Value of All Future Free Cash Flow (FCF).



Advantages of DCFA

• It produces the closest thing to an intrinsic value of a stock.
• DCF method is forward looking and depends more on future expectations than historical results.
• This method is based on FCF which is less subject to manipulation than some other figures and ratios calculated out of the financial statements.

Weakness of DCFA

• It is a mechanical valuation tool and is subject to the principle of "garbage in, garbage out."
• In particular, small changes of inputs in cash flows and discount rate can result in large changes n the value of a company.  
• Hence, IV obtained is never absolute and infallible, but rather an approximation.

Reference: 

Page 256 to 265  The Complete VALUE INVESTING Guide That Works! by K C Chong

Also  read:

* Warren Buffett Explains Why Book Value Is No Longer Relevant

http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2020/03/warren-buffett-explains-why-book-value.html

How to derive the intrinsic value of an asset?

https://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-to-derive-intrinsic-value-of-asset.html

The Choice of a Discount Rate

The other component of present-value analysis, choosing a discount rate, is rarely given sufficient consideration by investors.

• A discount rate is, in effect, the rate of interest that would make an investor indifferent between present and future dollars. 
• Investors with a strong preference for present over future consumption or with a preference for the certainty of the present to the uncertainty of the future would use a high rate for discounting their investments. 
• Other investors may be more willing to take a chance on forecasts holding true; they would apply a low discount rate, one that makes future cash flows nearly as valuable as today's. 
• There is no single correct discount rate for a set of future cash flows and no precise way to choose one. 

The appropriate discount rate for a particular investment depends not only on an investor's preference for present over future consumption but also on his or her own risk profile, on the perceived risk of the investment under consideration, and on the returns available from alternative investments.

• Investors tend to oversimplify; the way they choose a discount rate is a good example of this. 
• A great many investors routinely use 10 percent as an all-purpose discount rate regardless of the nature of the investment under consideration. 
• Ten percent is a nice round number, easy to remember and apply, but it is not always a good choice. 
• The underlying risk of an investment's future cash flows must be considered in choosing the appropriate discount rate for that investment. 
• A short-term, risk-free investment (if one exists) should be discounted at the yield available on short-term U.S. Treasury securities, which, as stated earlier, are considered a proxy for the risk-free interest rate.
• Low-grade bonds, by contrast, are discounted by the market at rates of 12 to 15 percent or more, reflecting investors' uncertainty that the contractual cash flows will be paid. 

It is essential that investors choose discount rates as conservatively as they forecast future cash flows.

• Depending on the timing and magnitude of the cash flows, even modest differences in the discount rate can have a considerable impact on the present-value calculation. 
• Business value is influenced by changes in discount rates and therefore by fluctuations in interest rates. 
• While it would be easier to determine the value of investments if interest rates and thus discount rates were constant, investors must accept the fact that they do fluctuate and take what action they can to minimize the effect of interest rate fluctuations on their portfolios. 

How can investors know the "correct" level of interest rates in choosing a discount rate?

• I believe there is no "correct" level of rates. 
• They are what the market says they are, and no one can predict where they are headed. 
• Mostly I give current, risk-free interest rates the benefit of the doubt and assume that they are correct. 
• Like many other financial-market phenomena there is some cyclicality to interest rate fluctuations. 
• High interest rates lead to changes in the economy that are precursors to lower interest rates and vice versa. 
• Knowing this does not help one make particularly accurate forecasts, however, for it is almost impossible to envision the economic cycle until after the fact. 

At Times when Interest Rates are Unusually Low

• At times when interest rates are unusually low, however, investors are likely to find very high multiples being applied to share prices. 
• Investors who pay these high multiples are dependent on interest rates remaining low, but no one can be certain that they will. 
• This means that when interest rates are unusually low, investors should be particularly reluctant to commit capital to long-term holdings unless outstanding opportunities become available, with a preference for either holding cash or investing in short-term holdings that quickly return cash for possible redeployment when available returns are more attractive. 

Investors can apply present-value analysis in one of two ways.

• They can calculate the present-value of a business and use it to place a value on its securities. 
• Alternatively, they can calculate the present-value of the cash flows that security holders will receive: interest and principal payments in the case of bondholders and dividends and estimated future share prices in the case of stockholders. 
• Calculating the present value of contractual interest and principal payments is the best way to value a bond. 
• Analysis of the underlying business can then help to establish the probability that those cash flows will be received. 

By contrast, analyzing the cash flows of the underlying business is the best way to value a stock.

• The only cash flows that investors typically receive from a stock are dividends. 
• The dividend-discount method of valuation, which calculates the present value of a projected stream of future dividend payments, is not a useful tool for valuing equities; for most stocks, dividends constitute only a small fraction of total corporate cash flow and must be projected at least several decades into the future to give a meaningful approximation of business value. 
• Accurately predicting that far ahead is an impossibility. 
• Once future cash flows are forecast conservatively and an appropriate discount rate is chosen, present value can be calculated. 

In theory, investors might assign different probabilities to numerous cash flow scenarios, then calculate the expected value of an investment, multiplying the probability of each scenario by its respective present value and then summing these numbers.

• In practice, given the extreme difficulty of assigning probabilities to numerous forecasts, investors make do with only a few likely scenarios. 
• They must then perform sensitivity analysis in which they evaluate the effect of different cash flow forecasts and different discount rates on present value. 
• If modest changes in assumptions cause a substantial change in net present value, investors would be prudent to exercise caution in employing this method of valuation.

Coca Cola's intrinsic value when Buffett first purchased it in 1988.

Buffett first purchased Coca-Cola in 1988.  In 1988:

• Owner earnings (net cash flow) of Coca-Cola = $828 million.
• Risk free rate of 30 year US Treasury Bond = 9% yield.

Discounted value of Coca-Cola's current owner earnings.

If Coca-Cola's 1988 owner earnings were discounted by 9% (Buffett does not add an equity risk premium to the discount rate):

• the value of Coca-Cola would have been $828m/9% = $9.2 billion.

$9.2 billion represents the discounted value of Coca-Cola's current owner earnings.




Was Buffett paying too much for Coca-Cola?


When Buffett purchased Coca-Cola, the market value of the company was $14.8 billion, indicating that Buffett might have overpaid for the company.

Because the market was willing to pay a price for Coca-Cola that was 60% higher than $9.2 billion, it indicated that buyers perceived part of the value of Coca Cola to be its future growth opportunities.

People asked, "Where is the value in Coke?"

The company's price was
- 15x earnings (30% premium to the market average), and,
- 12x cash flow (50% premium to the market average).




Where is the value in Coke? Its net cash flows discounted at an appropriate interest rate.


Buffett first purchased Coca-Cola in 1988.

Buffett paid 5x book value for a company with a 6.6% earning yield.

The company was earning a 31% ROE while employing relatively little in capital investment.

The value of Coca-Cola, like any other company, is determined by the net cash flows expected to occur over the life of the business, discounted at an appropriate interest rate.

When a company is able to grow owner earnings without the need for additional capital, it is appropriate to discount owner earnings by the difference between the risk-free rate of return (k) and the expected growth (g) of owner earnings, that is (k-g).




Using a two-stage discount model

Analyzing Coca-Cola, we find that owner earnings from 1981 through 1988 grew at 17.8% annual rate - faster than the risk-free rate of return.

When this occurs, analysts use a two-stage discount model.  

• This model is a way of calculating future earnings when a company has extraordinary growth for a limited number of years, and 
• then a period of constant growth at a slower rate.

We use this two-stage process to calculate the 1988 present value of the company's future cash flows.

In 1988, Coca-Cola's owner earnings were $828 million.

If we assume that Coca-Cola would be able to grow owner earnings at 15% per year for the next 10 years (a reasonable assumption, since that rate is lower than the company's previous seven-year average), by year 10, owner earnings will equal $3.349 billion.

Let us further assume that starting in year 11, growth rate will slow to 5% a year.  Using a discount rate of 9% (the long term bond rate at the time), we can calculate that the intrinsic value of Coca-Cola in 1988 was $48.3777 billion. 

(see Appendix A below for the detailed calculations.)




Using different growth-rate assumptions

We can repeat this exercise using different growth-rate assumptions.

• If we assume that Coca-Cola can grow owner earnings at 12% for 10 years followed by 5% growth, the present value of the company discounted at 9% would be $38.163 billion.
• At 10% growth for 10 years and 5 % thereafter, the value of Coca-Cola would be $32.497 billion.
• And if we assume only 5% throughout, the company would still be worth at least $20.7 billion [$828 million divided by (9% - 5%)].

Market price has nothing to do with value

The stock market's value of Coca-Cola in 1988 and 1989, during Buffett's purchase period, averaged $15.1 billion.

But by Buffett's estimation, the intrinsic value of Coca-Cola was anywhere from

• $20.7 billion (assuming 5% growth in owner earnings), 
• $32.4 billion (assuming 10% growth), 
• $38.1 billion (assuming 12% growth), 
• $48.3 billion (assuming 15% growth).

So Buffett's margin of safety - the discount to intrinsic value - could be as low as a conservative 27% or as high as 70%.




"Value" investors using P/E, P/B and P/CF considered Coca-Cola overvalued and missed purchasing it.

"Value" investors observed the same Coca-Cola that Buffett purchased and because its price to earnings, price to book, and price to cash flow were all so high, considered Coca-Cola overvalued.





===========

Appendix A: 

The Coca-Cola Company Discounted Owner Earnings Using a Two-Stage "Dividend" Discount Model (first stage is 10 years)

First stage:
Owner Earnings in 1988  $828 m
Growth rate 15% for next 10 years
Discount factor 9%

Sum of present value of owner earnings   = $11,248 
(Year 1 to 10)


Second stage:
Residual Value or Terminal Value

Owner earnings in year 10  $3,349
Growth rate (g)  5%
Owner earnings in year 11   $3,516
Capitalization rate (k-g)  4%
Value at end of year 10   $87,900
Discount factor at end of year 10  0.4224

Present Value of Residual                           =  $37,129


Intrinsic Value
Intrinsic Value of Company                        =  $48,377


Notes: 
Assumed first-stage growth rate = 15%
Assumed second-stage growth rate = 5%
k = discount rate = 9%
Dollar amounts are in millions.



Descriptive step-by-step approach to the above DCF:

The first stage applies 15% annual growth for 10 years. 

In year one, 1989, owner earnings would equal $952 million; by year ten, they will be $3,349 billion.

Starting with year eleven, growth will slow to 5% per year, the second stage.

In year eleven, owner earnings will equal $3,516 billion ($3,349 billion x 5% + $3,349 billion).

Now we can subtract this 5% growth rate from the risk-free rate of return (9%) and reach a capitalization rate of 4%.

The discounted value of a company with $3,516 billion in owner earnings capitalized at 4% is $87.9 billion.

Since this value, $87.9 billion, is the discounted value of Coca-Cola-s owner earnings in year eleven, we next have to discount this future value by the discount factor at the end of year ten  1/(1 + 0.09)^10 = 0.4224. 

The present value of the residual value of Coca-Cola in year ten is $37.129 billion. 

The value of Coca-Cola then equals its residual value ($37.129 billion) plus the sum of the present value of cash flows during this period ($11.248 billion), for a total of $48.377 billion.

The Investment shown by the DCF calculation to be the cheapest is the one that the investor should purchase.

How does Buffett value his companies?

For Buffett, determining a company's value is easy as long as you plug in the right variables: 

• the stream of cash and 
• the proper discount rate.

If he is unable to project with confidence what the future cash flows of a business will be, he will not attempt to value the company  This is the distinction of his approach.



Critics of Buffett's DCF valuation method.

Despite Buffett's claims, critics argue that estimating future cash flow is tricky, and selecting the proper discount rate can leave room for substantial errors in valuation.

Instead these critics have employed various shorthand methods to identify value:

• low price-to-earnings ratios, 
• price-to-book values and 
• high dividend yields.  

Practitioners have vigorously back tested these ratios and concluded that success can be had by isolating and purchasing companies that possess exactly these financial ratios.




Value investors versus Growth investors

People who consistently purchase companies that exhibit low price-to-earnings, low price-to-book, and high dividend yields are customarily called "value investors."

People who claim to have identified value by selecting companies with above-average growth in earnings are called "growth investors."  Typically, growth companies possess high price-to-earnings ratios and low dividend yields.  These financial traits are the exact opposite of what value investors look for in a company.



Growth and Value investing are joined at the hip.

Investors who seek to purchase value often must choose between the value and growth approach to selecting stocks.

Buffett admits that years ago, he participated in this intellectual tug-of-war.  Today he thinks the debate between these two schools of thought is nonsense.  

Growth and value investing are joined at the hip, says Buffett.

Value is the discounted present value of an investment's future cash flow; growth is simply a calculation used to determine value.




Growth can be add to and also can destroy value.

Growth in sales, earnings, and assets can either add or detract from an investment's value.

Growth can add to the value when the return on invested capital is above average, thereby assuring that when a dollar is being invested in the company, at least a dollar of market value is being created.
However, growth for a business earning low returns on capital can be detrimental to shareholders.

For example, the airline business has been a story of incredible growth, but its inability to earn decent returns on capital have left most owners off theses companies in a  poor position.



Which valuation method(s) to use?  Which stock to buy?

All the shorthand methods - high or low price-earnings ratios, price-to-book ratios, and dividend yields, in any number of combinations - fall short, Buffett says, in determining whether "an investor is indeed buying something for what it is worth and is therefore truly operating on the principle of obtaining value for his investments.............Irrespective of whether a business:

• grows or doesn't,
• displays volatility or smoothness in earnings , 
• or carries a high price or low in relation to its current earnings and book value, 

the investment shown by the discounted -flows-of-cash calculation to be the cheapest is the one that the investor should purchase.

The Basics of Share Valuation

You can only make money from investing in shares of good quality companies if you pay the right price for the shares.

A common mistake by investors is to think that buying quality companies is all that matters and the price paid for the shares is irrelevant.

Paying too high a price for a share is one of the biggest risks that you can take as an investor.

It is just as bad as investing in a poor-quality company in the first place.

The key to successful long-term investing is buying good companies at good prices.



Valuation

The price of a share is crucial to your long-term investing success.

You will need to learn how to value the shares of companies and set target prices for buying and selling them.

The valuation of shares can become a very complicated exercise.

There are lots of books out there on this subject and many make the process seem difficult to understand.

The good news is that it doesn't have to be this way.

Valuing shares is not a precise science: you only need to be roughly right and err on the side of caution.

The place to start is looking at the fair value of a share.



The fair value of a share

Professional analysts and investors spend lots of time trying to work out how much a share of a company is really worth.

To do this they need to estimate how much free cash flow the company will produce for its shareholders for the rest of its life and put a value on that in today's money, which is known as a present value.

This approach is known as a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation.

There are three steps to doing a DCF valuation:

1.  Estimate free cash flow per share for a period of future years.
Most analysts would probably try to forecast 10 years of future free cash flows.

2.  Choose what interest rate you want to receive in order to invest in the shares.
Shares are risky investments - more risky than savings accounts and most bonds - and so people demand to receive a higher interest rate in order to invest in them.

3.  Estimate what the value of the shares might be in 10 years' time and give that a value in today's money.
This is the terminal value and it stops you having to estimate free cash flows forever.  

Valuing companies in Emerging Markets

Valuation is usually difficult in emerging markets.

There are unique risks and obstacles not present in developed markets.

Additional considerations include

• macroeconomic uncertainty, 
• illiquid capital markets, 
• controls on the flow of capital into and out of the country, 
• less rigorous standards of accounting and 
• disclosure, and high levels of political risk.

To estimate value, three different methods are used:

1. a discounted cash flow (DCF) approach with probability-weighted scenarios that model the risks the business faces,
2. a DCF valuation with a country risk premium built into the cost of capital, and 
3. a valuation based on comparable trading and transaction multiples.

For developed nations, the analyst must:

• develop consistent economic assumptions,
• forecast cash flows, and 
• compute a WACC.

Computing cash flows, however, may require extra work because of accounting differences.

If done correctly, the two DCF methods (1 and 2 above) should give the same estimate of value.

Estimating Continuing Value of a Company

There are two parts to the estimated value of a company based on future cash flows:

1. a portion of the value based on the initial, explicit forecast period, and,
2. a portion of the value based on continuing performance beginning at the end of the explicit forecast period.

Estimated value of a company
= Estimated Operating Value of the initial, explicit forecast period + Continuing Value beginning at the end of the explicit forecast period.


The continuing value (CV) 

• often exceeds half of the total estimated operating value, and 
• when early years have negative cash flows, the continuing value can exceed the total estimated operating value.

Two formulas for estimating continuing value

There are two formulas for estimating continuing value:

• the discounted cash flow (DCF) formula, and
• the economic-profit formula.

Other methods for estimating continuing value exist.

The convergence formula is related to the preceding formulas, for example, and it assumes that excess profits will eventually be competed away.

Some methods do not depend on the time value of money.  Those methods include

• using multiples such as P/E, 
• estimates of liquidation value and 
• estimates of replacement costs.

Business value cannot be precisely determined. Make use of ranges of values.

Business value cannot be precisely determined. 

Not only do a number of assumptions go into a business valuation, but relevant macro and micro economic factors are constantly changing, making a precise valuation impossible. 

Although anyone with a calculator or a spreadsheet can calculate a net present value of future cash flows, the precise values calculated are only as accurate as the underlying assumptions.

Investors should instead make use of ranges of values, and in some cases, of applying a base value. 

Ben Graham wrote:

The essential point is that security analysis does not seek to determine exactly what is the intrinsic value of a given security. It needs only to establish that the value is adequate—e.g., to pro­tect a bond or to justify a stock purchase—or else that the value is considerably higher or considerably lower than the market price. For such purposes an indefinite and approximate measure of the intrinsic value may be sufficient.

There are only three ways to value a business. 

1.   The first method involves finding the net present value by discounting future cash flows. 

Problems with this method involve trying to predict future cash flows, and determining a discount rate. 

Investors should err on the side of conservatism in making assumptions for use in net present value calculations, and even then a margin of safety should be applied.

2.  The second method is Private Market Value using Multiples. 

This is a multiples approach (e.g. P/E, EV/Sales) based on what business people have paid to acquire whole companies of a similar nature. 

The problems with this method are that comparables assume businesses are all equal, which they are not. 

Furthermore, exuberance can cause business people to make silly decisions. 

Therefore, basing your price on a price based on irrationality can lead to disaster. 

This is believed to be the least useful of the three valuation methods.

3.  Finally, liquidation value as a method of valuation. 

A distinction must be made between a company undergoing a fire sale (i.e. it needs to liquidate immediately to pay debts) and one that can liquidate over time. 

Fixed assets can be difficult to value, as some thought must be given to how customised the assets are (e.g. downtown real-estate is easily sold, mining equipment may not be).

When should each method be employed? 

They can all be used simultaneously to triangulate towards a value. 

In some cases, however, one might place more confidence in one method over the others. 

For example, 

• liquidation value would be more useful for a company with losses that trades below book value, while 
• net present value is more useful for a company with stable cash flows.

Using the methods of valuation described, you can search for stocks that are trading at a severe discount; it is possible, their stock price more than doubled soon after.

Beware of these failures

The failures of relying on a company's earnings per share - too easily massaged.

The failure of relying on a company's book value  - not necessarily relevant to today's value.

The failure of relying on a company's dividend yield - incentives of management to make yields appear attractive at the expense of the company's future.

Read also:

• 
  
• Your investments using Mutual Funds or Money Managers
• Trading and portfolio management from a value investing point of view
• Value Investor's Opportunities in Distressed Securities
• Value Investing Opportunities in the Banking Sector
• Look at FUNDAMENTALS and POTENTIAL CATALYSTS when making investment decisions
• Where to look for Investment Opportunities
• Business value cannot be precisely determined. Make use of ranges of values
• Central elements to a Value Investing Philosophy
• The Philosophy of Value Investing and Why It Works
• Philosophy of value investing. Need to have clear strategies too
• How Wall Streets can create investment fads? The Junk Bond Market of mid-1980s
• Understanding these changes in the investment world allows investors to earn superior returns
• What's good for Wall Street is not necessarily good for investors
• Speculators, Investors and Market Fluctuations