Why Do Companies Care About Their Stock Prices?

Why Do Companies Care About Their Stock Prices?
by Investopedia Staff, (Investopedia.com) (Contact Author Biography)

Here's the irony of the situation: companies live and die by their stock price, yet for the most part they don't actively participate in trading their stocks within the market. Companies receive money from the securities market only when they first sell a security to the public in the primary market, which is commonly referred to as an initial public offering (IPO). In the subsequent trading of these shares on the secondary market (what most refer to as "the stock market"), it is the regular investors buying and selling the stock who benefit from any appreciation in stock price. Fluctuating prices are translated into gains or losses for these investors as they shift ownership of stock. Individual traders receive the full capital gain or loss after transaction costs.

The original company that issues the stock does not participate in any profits or losses resulting from these transactions because this company has no vested monetary interest. This is what confuses many people.

Why then does a company, or more specifically its management, care about a stock's performance in the secondary market when this company has already received its money in the IPO? Read on to find out.

Those in Management are Often Shareholders Too
The first and most obvious reason why those in management care about the stock market is that they typically have a monetary interest in the company. It's not unusual for the founder of a public company to own a significant number the outstanding shares, and it's also not unusual for the management of a company to have salary incentives or stock options tied to the company's stock prices. For these two reasons, management acts as stockholders and thus pay attention to their stock price.

Wrath of the Shareholders
Too often investors forget that stock means ownership. The job of management is to produce gains for the shareholders. Although a manager has little or no control of share price in the short run, poor stock performance could, over the long run, be attributed to mismanagement of the company. If the stock price consistently underperforms the shareholders' expectations, the shareholders are going to be unhappy with the management and look for changes. In extreme cases shareholders can band together and try to oust current management in a proxy fight. To what extent shareholders can control management is debatable. Nevertheless, executives must always factor in the desires of shareholders since these shareholders are part owners of the company.

Financing
Another main role of the stock market is to act as a barometer for financial health. Analysts are constantly scrutinizing companies and reflecting this information onto its traded securities. Because of this, creditors tend to look favorably upon companies whose shares are performing strongly. This preferential treatment is in part due to the tie between a company's earnings and its share price. Over the long term, strong earnings are a good indication that the company will be able to meet debt requirements. As a result, the company will receive cheaper financing through a lower interest rate, which in turn increases the amount of value returned from a capital project.

Alternatively, favorable market performance is useful for a company seeking additional equity financing. If there is demand, a company can always sell more shares to the public to raise money. Essentially this is like printing money, and it isn't bad for the company as long as it doesn't dilute its existing share base too much, in which case issuing more shares can have horrible consequences for existing shareholders.

The Hunters and the Hunted
Unlike private companies, publicly traded companies stand vulnerable to takeover by another company if they allow their share price to decline substantially. This exposure is a result of the nature of ownership in the company. Private companies are usually managed by the owners themselves, and the shares are closely held. If private owners don't want to sell, the company cannot be taken over. Publicly-traded companies, on the other hand, have shares distributed over a large base of owners who can easily sell at any time. To accumulate shares for the purpose of takeover, potential bidders are better able to make offers to shareholders when they are trading at lower prices.

For this reason, companies would want their stock price to remain relatively stable, so that they remain strong and deter interested corporations from taking them.On the other side of the takeover equation, a company with a hot stock has a great advantage when looking to buy other companies. Instead of having to buy with cash, a company will simply issue more shares to fund the takeover. In strong markets this is extremely common - so much that a strong stock price is a matter of survival in competitive industries.

Ego
Finally, a company may aim to increase share simply to increase their prestige and exposure to the public. Managers are human too, and like anybody they are always thinking ahead to their next job. The larger the market capitalization of a company, the more analyst coverage the company will receive. Essentially, analyst coverage is a form of free publicity advertising and allows both senior managers and the company itself to introduce themselves to a wider audience.

For these reasons, a company's stock price is a matter of concern. If performance of their stock is ignored, the life of the company and its management may be threatened with adverse consequences, such as the unhappiness of individual investors and future difficulties in raising capital.

by Investopedia Staff, (Contact Author Biography)Investopedia.com believes that individuals can excel at managing their financial affairs. As such, we strive to provide free educational content and tools to empower individual investors, including thousands of original and objective articles and tutorials on a wide variety of financial topics.

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/03/020703.asp?partner=NTU2

Avoid These Investment 'Bargains'

Avoid These Investment 'Bargains'
When is "such a deal" not such a great buy?

Christine Benz is Morningstar's director of personal finance, editor of Morningstar PracticalFinance, and author of the Morningstar Guide to Mutual Funds. Meet Morningstar's other investing specialists.

Like an extended warranty on a new appliance or the time-share pitch that's disguised as a "free" vacation, savvy consumers know that some deals that look good on the surface aren't all they're cracked up to be once you read the fine print. The same holds true in the investing marketplace.

A few months back, I shared some tips for unearthing a few true investment bargains. But what about those investments that seem like good deals but really aren't? I'll discuss some of them in this week's article.

Looking for Securities with a Cheap Share Price

Ford Motor and General Motors are currently trading at less than $2 and $3 per share, respectively. When storied companies like these two hit the skids, it may look tempting to gobble up their stocks in a bet that they won't go belly-up. After all, you can buy 100 shares of each for less than $500, and if they do manage to resuscitate themselves, you could stand to gain big. That's not the stupidest idea in the world--as long as you go in knowing that it's similar to a bet you might place in Vegas. If your bet works out, you're buying the drinks. If not, you could lose everything, as equity shareholders would likely lose almost everything if the two companies ended up in bankruptcy court. (For proof that gambling on near-busted companies is a risky proposition, just talk to shareholders of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac , and American International Group

Hoarding Company Stock--Even When You've Bought It at a Discount

Many publicly traded companies give their employees the opportunity to purchase their stock at a discount to the current share price. That might seem like a good deal. But loading up on your company's stock can be dangerous, particularly if you're hoarding shares of your company at the expense of building a well-diversified portfolio. Remember: You already have a lot tied up in your company's financial health and your industry via your job, so it's a mistake to compound that effect by socking a disproportionate share of your portfolio into your employer's stock. To be on the safe side, limit employer stock to no more than 5% of your overall portfolio.

Buying a Cheap Fund, Then Paying Commissions on Small Purchases

Exchange-traded funds have recently taken off in the marketplace, in part because their expenses can be lower than mutual funds that invest in the same basket of securities. Before you venture whole-hog into ETFs, however, take a step back and think about your investment style. If you plan to make a lump-sum investment and let it ride, the ETF may well be the best bet for you. However, that's not so if you trade frequently or make small purchases at regular intervals (and dollar-cost-averaging is a great way to invest, by the way). That's because you'll pay a commission to buy and sell ETFs, and those charges could quickly erode any cost savings versus plain-vanilla mutual funds. Ditto for paying a transaction fee to buy a fund in a mutual fund supermarket or buying a front-load fund, even if its expenses are low.

http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=265385