Conventional Valuation Yardsticks: Earnings and Earnings Growth

Earnings and Earnings Growth

Earnings per share has historically been the valuation yardstick most commonly used by investors.

Unfortunately, as we shall see, it is an imprecise measure, subject to manipulation and accounting vagaries.

It does not attempt to measure the cash generated or used by a business.

And as with any prediction of the future, earnings are nearly impossible to forecast.


Massaging earnings by managements

Corporate managements are generally aware that many investors focus on growth in reported earnings, and a number of them gently massage reported earnings to create a consistent upward trend.

A few particularly unscrupulous managements play accounting games to turn

• deteriorating results into improving ones, 
• losses into profits, and 
• small profits into large ones.

Earnings can mislead as to the real profit.

Even without manipulation, analysis of reported earnings can mislead investors as to the real profitability of a business.

Generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP) may require actions that do not reflect business reality.

• By way of example, amortization of goodwill, a noncash charge required under GAAP, can artificially depress reported earnings; an analysis of cash flow would better capture the true economics of a business. 
• By contrast, nonrecurring gains can boost earnings to unsustainable levels, and should be ignored by investors." 

Most important, whether investors use earnings or cash flow in their valuation analysis, it is important to remember that the numbers are not an end in themselves. Rather they are a means to understanding what is really happening in a company.




Conventional Valuation Yardsticks: Earnings, Book Value, and Dividend Yield

Both earnings and book value have a place in securities analysis but must be used with caution and as part of a more comprehensive valuation effort.

Are the earnings of the business relatively predictable or highly volatile?

A couple of important points worth considering in understanding a potential investment is whether the earnings of the business are relatively predictable or likely to be highly volatile.  

It is relatively easier to invest in something where the projected earnings are likely to have a strong element of stability about them.  

Earnings should preferably be consistent, sustainable and predictable.  "The past is so much easier to predict."

Stock valuation. Why does the value of a share of stocks depend on dividends?

Does the value of stocks depend on dividends or earnings?

Management determines its dividend policy by evaluating many factors, including:

• the tax differences between dividend income and capital gains,
• the need to generate internal funds to retire debt or invest, and,
• the desire to keep dividends relatively constant in the face of fluctuating earnings.

Since the price of a stock depends primarily on the present discounted value of all expected future dividends, it appers that dividend policy is crucial to determining the value of the stock.

However, this is not generally true. It does not matter how much is paid as dividends and how much is reinvested AS LONG AS the firm earns the same return on its retained earnings that shareholders demand on its stock. The reason for this is that dividends not paid today are reinvested by the firm and paid as even larger dividends in the future.

Dividend Payout Ratio

Management's choice of dividend payout ratio, which is the ratio of cash dividends to total earnings, does influence the timing of the dividend payments. 

The lower the dividend payout ratio (that is more earnings are retained), the smaller the dividends will be in the near future. Over time, however, dividends will rise and eventually will exceed the dividend path associated with a higher payout ratio.

Moreover, assuming that the firm earns the same rate on investment as the investors require from its equity (for example, ROE of 15%), the present value of these dividend streams will be identical no matter what payout ratio is chosen.

How to value Stocks?

Note that the price of the stock is always equal to the present value of ALL FUTURE DIVIDENDS and not the present value of future earnings. 

Earnings not paid to investors can have value only if they are paid as dividends or other cash disbursements at a later date. Valuing stock as the present discounted value of future earnings is manifestly wrong and greatly overstates the value of a firm. (Note: Firms that pay no dividends, such as Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, have value because their assets, which earn cash returns, can be liquidated and disbursed to shareholders in the future.)

John Burr Williams, one of the greatest investment analysts of the early part of the centrury and author of the classic The Theory of Investment Value, argued this point persuasively in 1938. He wrote: 

"Most people will object at once to the foregoing formula for valuing stocks by saying that it should use the present worth of future earnings, not future dividends. But should not earnings and dividends both give the same answer under the implicit assumptions of our critics? If earnings not paid out in dividends aree all successfully reinvested at compound interest for the benefit of the stockholder, as the critics imply, then these earnings should produce dividends later; if not, then they are money lost. Earnings are only a means to an end, and the means should not be mistaken for the end."


Ref: Stock for the Long Run, by Jeremy Siegel

http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/05/does-value-of-stocks-depend-on.html

Using PEG ratio: Not all growth is created equal.

As the risk increases, the PEG ratio of a firm decreases. When comparing the PEG ratios of firms with different risk levels, even within the same sector, the riskier firms should have lower PEG ratios than safer firms.

Not all growth is created equal. A firm that is able to grow at 20% a year, while paying out 50% of its earnings to stockholders, has higher quality growth than another firm with the same growth rate that reinvests all of its earnings back. Thus, the PEG ratio should increase as the payout ratio increases, for any given growth rate.

As with the PE ratio, the PEG ratio is used to compare the valuations of firms that are in the same business.  The PEG ratio is a function of:

• the risk,
• growth potential and
• the payout ratio of a firm.

http://zonecours.hec.ca/documents/A2009-1-1877347.ch18-earning-multiple(1).pdf

http://myinvestingnotes.blogspot.com/2009/11/using-peg-ratio-not-all-growth-is.html

Inherent Permanence of Earning Power - The Income that Keeps Coming In

If past earnings are to have any meaning to investors, there must be an inherent permanence to the earning power.  

Earnings may be cyclical, or even inconsistent, and still have some permanence.

• Many automobile companies have notoriously cyclical results; yet they have managed to keep up an ongoing business over many years.

Benjamin Graham considered a company to have stable earnings when:

1. earnings doubled in the most recent 10 years, and,
2. earnings declined by no more than 5% no more than twice in the past 10 years.

Another approach to measuring stability is to compare one period of earnings with an earlier period.  

• Stability is assessed by the trend of per-share earnings over a ten-year period, compared to the average of the most recent three years.  
• No decline represents 100% stability.

For example:  Company A earnings per share nearly doubled in the 10-year period 1984 -1994:

• 5.22  (1984); 6.25; 6.31;.5.90; 5.08; 1.36; 0.30; -2.7, 1.38, 6.77; and 10.1 (1994)
• 10-year average = $4.95
• 3-year average = $6.08
• 1994 book value = $46.65 per share
• 1995 trading range = $38.25 to $58.13 per share

Income Statement in Perspective

When problems exist in an income statement, they tend to distort earnings only in a single year, or over a short period of time.

To even out these short-term distortions, use average share price, annual earnings, and other numbers over a span of 7 to 10 years.

"Averaging" establishes typical numbers for the company.  The longer the time included in the average, the better.

Divine Dividends

Dividends represent nothing more than the investor's share of earnings that will be received immediately (rather than through reinvestment and future growth of the stock).

Dividends are one of the quickest and healthiest ways that earnings can make their way into shareholders' pockets.

Graham argued that intelligent investors would rather have dividends in their pockets (even if investors use them to buy more of the same stock) than risk waiting for possible future growth.  Furthermore, he insisted, it is management's responsibility to pay dividends.

For long-term investors who follow a "buy and hold" strategy, dividends are the only way to collect on investment gains.

In addition to representing money in the bank, dividends are, to many investors, a reliable indicator of future growth.  

Values are determined roughly by earnings available for dividends.  This relation among earnings, dividends and values survives.

A long history of dividend payments and regular dividend increases also indicates a substantial company with limited risk.  

Additionally, a rise in the dividend is tangible confirmation of the confidence of management in good times ahead.  A cut in the dividend is a red flag indicating trouble on the track.

Not all corporate income need be paid in dividends.  Depending on the industry and how much capital is required to keep the business growing, the appropriate payout may be as much as 80% or as little as 50% of net earnings.  

When studying the dividend payout of a company, calculate both average earnings and average dividends over a 10-year period.  From those two averages you can determine the average payout.  

Earnings fluctuate, but dividends tend to remain stable or,  in the best companies, to rise gradually.


One way of determining if a stock is overvalued or undervalued is to compare its dividend yield with that of similar companies.

• Safety, growth, and other factors being equal, the stock with the highest dividend and the lowest share price is the best bargain.
• As a further check of value, investors should compare the stock's dividend yield with that of the whole stock market dividend yield.

Rationale for Withholding Dividends

If a company isn't paying dividends it should, like Berkshire Hathaway, be doing something profitable with its earnings.  

It is acceptable to withhold dividends for the following reasons:

• To strengthen the company's working capital
• To increase productive capacity
• To reduce debt.

Graham contended that when corporate management is stingy with dividends or withholds them altogether, it is sometimes for self-serving reasons.  It is easier to keep the cash on hand to bail management out of bad times or bad decisions.  Sometimes the dividend policy is simply a reflection of the tax status of management and large investors - they don't want the addition to their current taxable income.  Consequently, other investors get no income.

Dividends in Jeopardy

Dividends may be put in jeopardy in two ways:

• When a company's earnings per share is less than its dividend per share
• When debt is excessive.

A company's average earnings (over several years) should be sufficient to cover its average dividend.  Though earnings per share can fall below dividend per share from time to time with reserves making up the difference, the condition can persist for only so long.  

A company with substantial earnings rarely becomes insolvent because of bank loans.  But when a company is under pressure, lenders may require a suspension of dividends as a form of financial discipline.

Safety with a security residing in earnings -not collateral

 "Experience has shown that in most cases safety resides in the earning power, and if this is deficient the assets lose most of their reputed value." 

Relating Price of Stock to its Earnings and Earnings Growth Rate

Here is an interesting way to think about your stock.  What do you think will be the price of Company A next year or 5 years from now? 

The obvious answer is no one knows.

However, one can in general, agree that if Company A grows its earnings, this will be reflected in a higher price of its stock.  Therefore to answer the question objectively, one would need to know exactly what will be company A's earnings for next year and in 5 years time.  As this is impossible, one can only guess or have a good 'hunch' about its future earnings.  Accordingly, there will always a speculative element in your estimates of future earnings when you invest in a stock.

Nevertheless, price of a stock is intimately linked to earnings.  When the company increases its earnings, this will be reflected in its share price also increasing.  However, short term volatility in price can be large and the price correlation with the earnings likewise volatile over the short term.  It is important for long term investors to know that the correlation between price and earnings over the long term is indeed very strong.  This relationship is to be exploited by the intelligent investors.

Therefore, when asked if the share price of Company A will double in 5 years from today, assuming that its present price is fair price, an appropriate answer might be be, definitely yes, IF it can double its earnings in 5 years.

For earnings to double in 5 years, the EARNINGS GROWTH RATE should be about 15% per year over these 5 years.  The company growing its earnings at lower than 15% per year is less likely to double its share price in 5 years from its fair price.  (Its share price may double at lower earnings growth rate if it started off severely undervalued.)   For example, a company with earnings growing at 7% per year is anticipated to see its share price doubled in 10 years.

On the other hand, a company growing its earnings at greater than 15% per year sustainably, will see its share price doubling in 5 years.  However, a company growing at high growth rates carries with it certain risks related to this fast growth.   Another paradox of a high earnings growth company is that its share price tends to be high due to popularity of the company amongst investors.  Therefore, though it may be a great company, it may not be a great investment if bought at very high price.

For those aiming for high returns in their investing, focusing on the quality of earnings and earnings growth (besides other business characteristics, risks and fundamentals) of a company, is important.  Is the company able to grow its business and earnings sustainably over many years?

What to look for: Quality

Important attributes to look for in an earnings statement - QUALITY

As the market exerts ever-increasing pressure on companies to perform to a stringent set of expectations, the idea of accounting "stretch" enters the picture.

Even in complying with the rules, companies have latitude to apply accounting principles in ways that make performance look better.

This lattitude can affect the quality of earnings reports.

Recent legislation and standardizations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, have brought financial reporting generally more in line with reality.

What to look for: Healthy Components in the Earnings Statement

Important attributes to look for in an earnings statement - HEALTY COMPONENTS: COMPARATIVE and TRENDS

Value investors look at individual lines in the earnings statement, not just the bottom line.

Improving gross margins - especially sustained improvement - signal strong business improvement.

Costs are under control, and the company is improving its market position.

Likewise, improving operating margins can show better cost control, greater efficiency, and rewards from earlier expansion cycles.

And value investors constantly compare companies in similar industries.

Gross margins of competing computer manufacturers, for instance, tell a lot about who has the

• best market position,
• production and delivery process, and
• business model.

Comparing the incomparable is an all-too-common investing pitfall. With earnings statements, this error takes three forms:

1. Earnings statements are not always broken down the same way.

• Although the bottom line is the bottom line, the intermediate steps may be different.
• One company's operating earnings may include marketing costs, while another's may not.
• Typically, statements from firms in the same industry are comparable, but not always.

2. Two companies that appear (and even are classified) in the same industry may have differences large enough to raise caution.

• Commercial and industrial suppliers, such as Honeywell, have consumer divisions, while consumer businesses, such as Procter & Gamble, have industrial divisions.
• Many businesses supply a mix of products in a mix of categories to a mix of customers.
• "Pure plays" in a business or industry are not always easy to find.
• The upshot: You must understand businesses before comparing them.

3. Numbers may include extraordinary items.

• Before comparing operating or net profit numbers, consider whether there have been write-offs for discontinued businesses or impaired assets that may be causing one-time distortions in the numbers.

What to look for: Consistency

Important attributes to look for in an earnings statement - CONSISTENCY

Long-term growth should be sustainable and consistent.

Look for sustained growth across business cycles.

A big pop in earnings one year followed by malaise for the next two does not paint a pretty picture. Long, consistent successful earnings track records get the A grades.

Beyond earnings, consistency is a desired feature for other parts of the earnings statement.

Consistency is highly prized in:

• sales and sales growth,
• profit margins and margin growth, and
• operating expense and expense trends.

The less consistency, the more difficult to predict the future five or ten years and beyond, and the less attractive a company looks to value investors.

What to look for: Growth

Important attributes to look for in an earnings statement - GROWTH

After all is said and done, the long-term growth of a stock price is driven by growth in the business.

Growth in the business means growth in the earnings - there is no other way to sustain business growth without infusions of additional owner capital.

Sure, you can acquire, merge, or sell more stocks to make a business larger by common definitions, but has the business really "grown"?

The value investor works to obtain a deep understanding of business growth, growth trends, and the quality of growth.

• Is reported growth based on internal core competencies?
• Or is it acquired or speculative growth based on unproven ventures?

The value investor assesses growth and growth patterns, judges the validity of growth reported, and attempts to project the future.

A business' ability to grow on its own, through its own success and resulting earnings, is known as organic growth.

Growth through acquisition or other capital infusions are not "organic" and thus does not suggest growth in true business value.

The Importance of Earnings

Business and economic activity are undertaken with the idea of generating a profit.

Profit is simply the gross revenue of an enterprise, minus the cost of producing that income, over a defined period of time. For businesses, it's important to measure the profit and allocate capital resources in such a way as to maximise it.

It is the earnings that make the world go round.

So much is made of earnings and earnings reports. Do you hear much about a company's cash balance, accumulated depreciation, or owner's equity during CNBC and other financial shows?

Does everyone salivate four times a year for "asset season?"

No, but there's a definite "earnings season" at the end of each calendar quarter, giving financial analysts, journalists, and pundits plenty to talk about.

On an ongoing basis, earnings are the driving force and "macro" indicator of a company's success.

• If earnings are growing, the financial press doesn't worry much about the other stuff.
• Conversely, serve up a couple of double faults on the earnings front, and everybody is all over asset impairment, write-offs, debt, weak cash positions, and the other similar "disasters."

In the purest sense, long-term stock price appreciation is based on the growth of a company's asset base and owner's equity in that base. Ultimately, that comes from earnings.

If a company is earning money, and particularly if it earns it at a growing rate, that's a good thing. As Warren Buffett says, "If the business does well, the stock always follows."

Earnings tell us how well a business manages its operations, while the balance sheet tells us how well it manages its resources.

Does the value of stocks depend on dividends or earnings?

Does the value of stocks depend on dividends or earnings?

Management determines its dividend policy by evaluating many factors, including:

• the tax differences between dividend income and capital gains,
• the need to generate internal funds to retire debt or invest, and,
• the desire to keep dividends relatively constant in the face of fluctuating earnings.

Since the price of a stock depends primarily on the present discounted value of all expected future dividends, it appers that dividend policy is crucial to determining the value of the stock.

However, this is not generally true. It does not matter how much is paid as dividends and how much is reinvested AS LONG AS the firm earns the same return on its retained earnings that shareholders demand on its stock. The reason for this is that dividends not paid today are reinvested by the firm and paid as even larger dividends in the future.

Dividend Payout Ratio

Management's choice of dividend payout ratio, which is the ratio of cash dividends to total earnings, does influence the timing of the dividend payments.

The lower the dividend payout ratio (that is more earnings are retained), the smaller the dividends will be in the near future. Over time, however, dividends will rise and eventually will exceed the dividend path associated with a higher payout ratio.

Moreover, assuming that the firm earns the same rate on investment as the investors require from its equity (for example, ROE of 15%), the present value of these dividend streams will be identical no matter what payout ratio is chosen.

How to value Stocks?

Note that the price of the stock is always equal to the present value of ALL FUTURE DIVIDENDS and not the present value of future earnings.

Earnings not paid to investors can have value only if they are paid as dividends or other cash disbursements at a later date. Valuing stock as the present discounted value of future earnings is manifestly wrong and greatly overstates the value of a firm. (Note: Firms that pay no dividends, such as Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway, have value because their assets, which earn cash returns, can be liquidated and disbursed to shareholders in the future.)

John Burr Williams, one of the greatest investment analysts of the early part of the centrury and author of the classic The Theory of Investment Value, argued this point persuasively in 1938. He wrote:

"Most people will object at once to the foregoing formula for valuing stocks by saying that it should use the present worth of future earnings, not future dividends. But should not earnings and dividends both give the same answer under the implicit assumptions of our critics? If earnings not paid out in dividends aree all successfully reinvested at compound interest for the benefit of the stockholder, as the critics imply, then these earnings should produce dividends later; if not, then they are money lost. Earnings are only a means to an end, and the means should not be mistaken for the end."


Ref: Stock for the Long Run, by Jeremy Siegel