Saturday 23 October 2010

How to invest like Warren Buffett

The author's book on Warren Buffett, "The Midas Touch", summarises the favourite investing principles of the "Sage of Omaha".
Warren Buffett - How to invest like Warren Buffett
Fanatical: offered a glass of good wine at a dinner, Warren Buffett said: 'Just hand me the money' Photo: AFP/GETTY
My book on Warren Buffett, "The Midas Touch", has just been published in Britain. It contains most of his favourite investing principles. Although time has passed since its original appearance, his ideas today are much the same.
Here is a handful of the central ones. They aren't easy: this is a competitive game.
1. The key to investing is found in this rule: buy a share as though you were buying the whole company.
To do that, you have to know what the enterprise is worth. Therefore, the investor should live in the world of companies, never of mathematical formulae.
In the latest annual meeting of Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett's company, his partner Charles Munger put it this way: "The worst decisions are often made with the most formal projections. They look so professional that you begin to believe the numbers are reality.
"You are taken in by the false precision. Business schools teach this stuff because they have to teach something."
2. A recent heresy is that market volatility equals risk. Quite the contrary!
For a serious investor, volatility creates opportunity. To use my own language, investment opportunity consists of the difference between reality and perception. High volatility increases that difference, and thus increases opportunity for the knowledgeable investor.
Mr Buffett says sardonically that he favours the dotty "efficient market theory" because it creates more opportunities for him.
3. As to growth versus value, Mr Buffett observes that "value" should include projected growth, notably "growth at a reasonable price" or Garp.
He looks for companies with a business "moat" around them that should have steady, reasonably predictable growth.
Perhaps a better phraseology for the growth versus value dichotomy might be "high growth" versus "bargain hunting". The analytical techniques, and investor temperaments, in the two approaches are quite different. One calls for a futurologist, the other for an accountant.
That said, for a taxpaying investor long-term growth is more convenient and more tax-efficient than seeking one bargain after another.
4. High technology, most emerging markets, leveraged buyouts, real estate and other hard to appraise exotica might as well not exist for Mr Buffett.
He follows the safest approach: stick to what you know best. However, many approaches are valid. Your advantage will be the extent to which your knowledge of a valid situation exceeds the market's.
It makes little difference how broad your knowledge is. One correct investment decision is as valuable as another. Mr Buffett says that one should only seek a handful of really big ideas in one's investing career. The key is to be right when you do decide, not to flutter about spreading yourself thin.
5. Investing in bad industries, or turnarounds, usually doesn't work.
A skilled surgeon can excise a tumour but to revive a moribund patient requires a magician. The princess hopes that when she kisses the toad a beautiful prince will spring up. In fact, alas, she will probably end up awash in toads.
6. Businesses that generate cash that they can reinvest at high rates of return over long periods are particularly attractive holdings.
Low-margin businesses that periodically call for more cash from their investors, which they can only invest at a modest rate of return, are a dismal affair. Differently put, if all else is the same, feel free to marry an heiress rather than a pauper.
7. Don't sell a great stock just because it has doubled.
It could be better value afterwards than it was before. The greatest stocks may go up 20 or even 100 times in a generation or two.
Peter Lynch, who built up Fidelity's Magellan fund, points out that the deluded policy of "rebalancing" more or less automatically because a stock has risen is a lot like pulling out the flowers in the garden and watering the weeds. Don't do it!
8. A grave corporate folly is offering your own underpriced stock for the fully valued stock of an acquisition candidate.
In that scenario, instead of paying 50p for £1 of value, you are paying £1 for 50p of value. Lunacy! Still, such situations are often generated by the megalomania of chief executives.
9. Avoid long-term bonds.
"We are bound to have inflation, given current policies. There are a lot of incentives for politicians in all countries to inflate their currencies," Mr Buffett says.
10. To do superlatively well, an investor, like a company manager, must be a fanatic.
By relentless concentration, Mr Buffett has moved billions of dollars from other people's pockets into his own. Alas, he doesn't enjoy what money can buy. He's a miser.
Once, offered a glass of good wine at a dinner, he said: "Just hand me the money." So, it may be helpful in business terms to be that focused, but not necessarily in human terms.
Still, to preserve capital, which is difficult, one should understand the principles, and Mr Buffett's are all good ones.
"The Midas Touch" by John Train is published by Harriman House. Mr Train founded Train Smith Investment Counsel and he has written hundreds of columns for the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and Forbes magazine. Apart from "The Midas Touch", his best-selling books include "The Craft of Investing", "The Money Masters" and "The New Money Masters".



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/5708407/How-to-invest-like-Warren-Buffett.html

Why I'm with Warren Buffett on bonds versus equities

Follow the herd or follow Warren Buffett? That sounds like it should be a pretty simple choice for most investors given the average investor's consistent ability to buy and sell at the wrong time and the sage of Omaha's ranking as one of the world's richest men.

 
Warren Buffett told a conference he couldn't imagine anyone having bonds in their portfolio when they could have equities Photo: GETTY
Curious then that Mr Buffett is doing a passable imitation of Cassandra – she who was cursed so that she could foretell the future but no one would ever believe her.
Here's Buffett, speaking last week to Fortune magazine's Most Powerful Women Summit: "It's quite clear that stocks are cheaper than bonds. I can't imagine anyone having bonds in their portfolio when they can have equities ... but people do because they lack the confidence."
And here's what everyone else is doing. According to Morgan Stanley, the speed of inflows to bond funds is even greater than retail inflows into equity funds at the height of the technology bubble in 2000 – $410bn (£256bn) in the 12 months to April 2010 in the US versus $340bn into equities in the year to September 2000.
Over here, too, investors can't get enough fixed income. According to the Investment Management Association, net sales of global bonds and corporate bonds both exceeded £600m during August. Only absolute return funds were anywhere close to these inflows. The staple British equity fund sector, UK All Companies, saw £291m of redemptions and even the previously popular Asia ex-Japan sector raised a paltry £22m.
So, is this a bubble waiting to burst or a logical investment choice in a deflationary world where interest rates could stay lower for longer as governments adopt more desperate strategies to prevent another slump?
The case for bond prices staying high has received a boost in recent weeks as speculation has grown that the US government is contemplating a second round of quantitative easing. Printing yet more money to buy bonds creates a buyer of last resort and would underpin the price of Treasuries even at today's elevated levels.
Indeed, the talk on Wall Street has turned to a measure the US government has not employed since the Second World War when a target yield for government securities was set with the implied promise that the authorities would buy up whatever they needed to keep the cost of money low.
Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, referred to this policy in his famous "Helicopter Ben" speech of 2002 when he reminded financial markets of the US government's ultimate weapon in the fight against deflation – the printing press. It really is no wonder that the price of gold is on a tear.
For a few reasons, however, I'm not convinced that the theoretical possibility that interest rates could go yet lower Ã  la Japan makes a good argument for buying bonds at today's levels.
First, to return to fund flows, extremes of buying have in the past been a very good contrarian indicator of future performance. Equity flows represented around 4pc of total assets in 2000 just as the bubble was bursting. At the same time, there were very significant outflows from bond funds just ahead of a strong bond market rally.
My second reason for caution is illustrated by the chart, which shows how little reward investors are receiving for lending money to the US government (and the UK, German or Japanese governments for that matter). Accepting this kind of yield makes sense only if you believe the US economy is fatally wounded and that the dragon of inflation has been slain. I don't believe in either thesis.
History shows very clearly that investing in bonds when the starting yield is this low has resulted in well-below-average returns if and when rates start to rise. Between 1941 and 1981, when interest rates last rose for an extended period, the total return from bonds was two and a half times lower when the starting point was a yield of under 3pc than when it started above this level. Investing when yields are low stacks the odds against you.
My final reason for caution is that there is no need to put all your eggs in the bond basket. Around a quarter of FTSE 100 shares are yielding more than 4pc while the income from gilts is less than 3pc. More income and the potential for it to rise over time too. I'm with Warren on this one.
Tom Stevenson is an investment director at Fidelity Investment Managers. The views expressed are his own.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/tom-stevenson/8052896/Why-Im-with-Warren-Buffett-on-bonds-versus-equities.html

Why government bond markets have become the latest mad and bad asset bubble


The five-year gilt  (Photo: AP)
The five year gilt yield has fallen to a new low (Photo: AP)
The benchmark five year gilt yield fell to a new low of 1.43 per cent on Thursday, which astonishingly takes it to a 25 basis point discount to that of its German bund counterpart. The UK Government likes to think of the record lows to which gilt yields have sunk to be a vote of confidence by international investors in its plans for fiscal consolidation, and no doubt there is a small element of truth in this contention. But the main factors driving government bond yields ever lower, not just here in the UK, but in the US too, are much more worrying and have little to do with the bravery of George Osborne’s deficit reduction programme.
In essence, both the UK and US government bond markets have become giant bubbles which are now largely divorced from underlying realities and almost bound to end badly. Yes, for sure if the UK Government hadn’t done something about the deficit, then we might be looking at far less benign conditions in the gilts market, but just to repeat the point, it’s not really enhanced credit worthiness which is causing these abnormally low yields.
The US is experiencing much the same phenomenon, even though its public finances are in just as big a mess as the UK’s and it has virtually no plan that I can discern for deficit reduction, besides the wing and a prayer hope that growth will eventually come to the rescue.
So what’s really driving this dash for government debt? One possibility is that bond markets are already pricing in a depression, or at least a Japanese style lost decade of deflation. Despite ever more mountainous quantities of public debt, bond yields in Japan have been at abnormally low levels for years. Indeed, in Japan the abnormal is now normal. If you think the price of goods and services will soon be deflating, then even bonds on 1 per cent yields offer a healthy rate of return.
But no, the real reason lies in the market distortions that result from ultra easy monetary policy and the demands being put by regulators on banks to hold “riskless” assets. This is leading to a profound mis-pricing of government bonds, which now take virtually no account of significant medium term inflation risks.
If you think markets are always right, then bond prices are indeed signalling the inevitability of a depression, but if there is one thing we have been forced by the events of the last three years to relearn about markets it is that they are prone to episodes of extreme mispricing. The bond phenomenon is very likely one of them.
There are a number of ways in which bond markets are being distorted. One is regulatory demands on banks to hold bigger “liquidity buffers”. The asset of choice in boosting these buffers is government bonds. These have already been proved by Europe’s sovereign debt crisis to be very far from the “riskless” assets of regulatory supposition. Even so, banks are still being forced to max out on government debt.
A second distortion is caused by the “carry trade” opportunities of exceptionally low short term interest rates. Put crudely, you can borrow from the central bank for next to zero, lend the money out at a higher rate further up the yield curve, and pocket the difference. In a sense, that’s the purpose of ultra-easy monetary policy – to create a generally low interest rate environment – but the dangers of it are obvious. Central banks are creating a bubble in government debt.
5yr-30yrsgiltspread
And so to the biggest reason of the lot. Look at the chart above (created from Bloomberg data), which shows the yield gap between the five and thirty year gilt, and you can see that it has widened substantially over the past year. The reason is that investors are anticipating another bout of quantitative easing from the Bank of England. In the last round of QE, the Bank concentrated purchases initially on UK gilts in the five to 25 year range, but then widened this to include three year gilts and some 25 year plus bonds after running up against supply constraints. Investors are buying up the five year gilt because they know this is where the Bank, if it does more QE, will find most scarcity. Exactly the same thing is happening in the US, where more QE is already pretty much a done deal.
Anyone with half a brain can see that Germany is a rather more credit worthy and naturally inflation proofed country than either the UK or the US, yet the cost of five year money in Germany is now higher. How can this be? The explanation lies in the absence of overt QE in the eurozone. There have been no purchases of German bunds by the European Central Bank.
In fighting the aftermath of the last bubble by flooding the market with ultra-cheap liquidity, the Fed and the Bank of England seem only to be inflating new ones. There are others besides government bonds, commodities and emerging market assets being the most obvious. I’m not saying these policies are as a consequence flawed and wrong. That wider debate involves an altogether more complex and diverse range of issues. But the risks are self evident.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jeremywarner/100008271/why-government-bond-markets-have-gone-mad-and-bad/

Friday 22 October 2010

Understanding Malaysian REITS

Thursday October 21, 2010

What is REITS and how to get monthly dividend payments from it

Personal Investing - By Ooi Kok Hwa


A LOT of investors, especially senior citizens, are hoping to get consistent and regular dividend payments from stocks.
In this article, we will look into constructing an investment portfolio, which consists of real estate investment trusts (REITs), to get monthly dividend payments.
A REIT is a real estate company that pool investor funds to purchase a portfolio of properties. Normally, it has two unique characteristics: investment in income-producing properties, with almost all of its profits distributed to investors as dividends.
From the table, based on the latest stock price (as at Oct 18) and on assumption that the same dividend payments will be paid over the next 12-month period, almost all REITs will provide about 7%-8% dividend yields. Based on our observations, most of the REITs will try to pay higher dividends over the years. Hence, if the overall economy continues to recover, some REITs may pay even higher dividends for the coming few years.
Due to them only listing at the middle of this year, we have excluded CMMT and Sunreit.
As mentioned earlier, a lot of retirees would like to invest in investment assets that can provide a consistent and regular dividend income. Therefore, we think that REITs can provide a good alternative to the retirees. From the table, except for Arreit, Atrium, Axreit and Hektar, all other REITs will make dividend payments twice per year. Most of them will pay their dividends in the month of February and August. Hence, if an investor would like to receive his dividends other than the above two months, he may need to diversify their REITs into holding many types of REITs.
Based on the list of REITs in the table, we can see that, except for the month of January and April, dividend payments were being made at different months throughout the year, thus investors can receive a stream of dividend income by buying into different types of REITs.
Investors can build a REIT portfolio consisting of a few REITs which make dividend payments at different months of the year. The following is just one of selection options available for consideration.
Based on the current price dated on Oct 18, assuming that the same dividends will be paid in the next 12 months, a portfolio with AMfirst, Arreit, Atrium and Hektar can generate a dividend yield of more than 8% (see table). Besides, by buying with equal amount into these four REITs, investors can get dividend payments for almost every month, except for the month of January, April, July and October.
Nevertheless, investors need to understand that the above selections are solely based on the assumption that these REITs will reward investors with the same dividends and pay during the same month as shown in the table above.
We also understand that apart from the above four REITs, some other REITs may reward investors with even higher dividend payments.
OoiKokHwa is an investment adviser and managing partner of MRR Consulting.


Click here too:
http://boyboycute.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-bother-investing-in-malaysian-reits.html
This blogger expressed concerns over Malaysian REITS.

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 21, 2010


Why bother investing in Malaysian REITs?

Today, i read an article on The Star by Mr. Ooi Kok Hwa regarding REITs. Take a lot at the article here.

What makes me furious is that Mr. Ooi who is an investment adviser and managing partner of MRR Consulting,has misled the public by not discussing the real issues in Malaysian REITs(MREIT).I guess a consultant is still a CONsultant.

MREIT is full of crap properties.If you look at their portfolio,most of these properties are actually dumped by developers/owners since they cannot sell their buildings in the market to professional institutional investors.For example,SUNWAY REIT (which i wrote earlier) is one of them.Creating a REIT is the best way for developers/owners to either 'sell their building at higher valuation' or 'unload their poor quality properties to the market'.

Thursday 21 October 2010

Singaporean Investor sentiment high

Oct 20, 2010
Investor sentiment high
By Aaron Low
About 52 per cent of respondents in the survey believed their share investments will rise, compared with 46 per cent three months ago. -- ST PHOTO: BRYAN VAN DER BEEK

INVESTORS in Singapore are betting that the red-hot stock market will keep rising but they believe prospects for the property market have dimmed, a new survey said.

It found also that overall investor sentiment, which has been positive for the past 18 months, rose by five per cent in the three months to Sept 30, compared with the previous quarter.

About two-thirds of respondents here said their investments had brought in positive returns while around 63 per cent expect a higher return in the next three months. Such a positive outlook has been fuelled mainly by the strength of the stock market, which recently hit a 29-month high.

About 52 per cent of respondents in the survey believed their share investments will rise, compared with 46 per cent three months ago.

The survey was done by financial services firm ING Group, polling 3,755 affluent investors across 12 Asia-Pacific countries, including China and Singapore.

Remisier Desmond Leong attributed the bullish sentiment to the psychological effect of watching the stock market's march upwards. 'You may have doubts initially about its rise but when you see the market moving up, you jump in too.'

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_592933.html

Current healthcare business model causing rise in expenditure

Frost & Sullivan: Current healthcare business model causing rise in expenditure


Written by Melody Song
Thursday, 21 October 2010 13:04


KUALA LUMPUR: The current healthcare business model, which is driven by incentives given by insurance providers based on patient visits are causing the rise in healthcare expenditure, according to a survey from Frost & Sullivan.

The business research and consultancy firm said in a statement Thursday, Oct 21 that the present model results in 90% of a country’s healthcare expenditure being spent on only 30% of its population, thereby causing the rise in healthcare cost.

“The healthcare system needs to embrace a paradigm shift to incentivize the wellness condition of a person rather than merely treating diseases or sick-care” said Frost & Sullivan senior vice president Reenita Das.

Frost & Sullivan also said that under the current healthcare system, physicians' attention is only focused on 20% of a person's life, whilst another 80% goes neglected.

Medical hours are spent on treating symptoms or diseases rather than ensuring the overall wellness of a person, it added.

“There are huge opportunities for healthcare providers, medical devices sector, pharmaceutical sector and other healthcare verticals to tap into this 'lucrative but yet to be explored area’ of a person’s life,” it said.

Frost & Sullivan said it expected the cost of healthcare to continue rising as the global ageing population increases under the current healthcare model, unless there is a paradigm shift in the healthcare system towards a patient-centric model.

http://www.nextview.com/rss_list.php?url=http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/index.phpYYYoption=com_contentXXXtask=viewXXXid=175757XXXItemid=79

Association tells glove makers to up prices

Written by Surin Murugiah
Wednesday, 20 October 2010 15:16


KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Rubber Glove Manufacturers’ Association (Margma), whose members collectively supply 60% of the global rubber latex glove consumption, advised its members to raise glove prices in line with high raw material costs and continued weakening of the US dollar.

This may well explain the share price surge among the rubber glove makers on Bursa Malaysia yesterday.

Top Glove Corporation Bhd rose 19 sen to RM5.68 Supermax Corporation Bhd was up 14 sen sen to RM4.65, Latexx Partners Bhd up four sen to RM2.86, and Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd gained two sen to RM2.86.

But Hartalega Holdings Bhd shed four sen to RM5.42 while Rubberex Corporation (M) Bhd lost 0.5 sen to 85.5 sen.

In a statement yesterday, Margma president KM Lee said most rubber glove manufacturers had started raising selling prices of their products to reflect the rising raw material costs and the weakening of the US dollar.

“If the orders forthcoming do not match the glove price requested, glove makers have no choice but to reduce the output,” said Lee.

Margma said the price of natural rubber latex had increased by about 19% from an average 657.25 sen/kg in January 2010 to a new record high of 782 sen/kg last Friday.

Meanwhile, the US dollar has weakened against the ringgit by around 13% compared to 12 months ago, it said.

Rubber futures contract in Shanghai hit an all-time high yesterday boosted by strong demand at a time of restricted supply in main producing countries. Concerns that rubber production in China will be affected by typhoons also lent support to the futures price.

The Shanghai rubber futures contract for March delivery hit a record 33,000 yuan (RM15,438) per tonne, up 3.8% from the previous high of 31,800 yuan per tonne marked on Oct 15.

Lee said despite the strong headwinds, the industry would remain bullish as demand for gloves was expected to grow at between 8% and 10% annually.

“We expect further growth in the industry on the back of rising healthcare awareness in emerging markets, especially in China, India and the Latin American countries.

“Comparatively, the healthcare expenditure in these regions is relatively low against what is being spent in the US, Europe and Japan,” said Lee.

Lee added that the domestic glove industry was to a large extent recession-proof and was relatively unscathed even during the recent economic downturn, mainly due to gloves being a necessity in the healthcare sector.

However, he pointed out that the glove industry was facing constant challenge with the ever-fluctuating raw material prices, particularly natural rubber latex for rubber gloves and crude oil for nitrile gloves.

The association also urged the government to be considerate in the removal of the natural gas subsidy by not overburdening an already challenging industry with a big and sudden gas price hike.

The removal of the subsidy for natural gas should be done over a period of time, it said.

The association has 46 members and 89 associate members. The ordinary membership is open to all bona fide rubber glove makers in Malaysia while others who directly involved in the trade or industry are eligible for associate membership.


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, October 20, 2010.

Weeding out over-heated stocks

Avoiding over-priced stocks that could plunge anytime is as critical as picking the right stocks. 

Buying over-heated stocks and losing money in a bubble burst is not an uncommon phenomenon in the markets.

Stocks that have moved up the ladder very quickly are potentially risky. The sudden spurt could be based on a rumour or event not backed by strong fundamentals. 

Good market conditions or bull runs do not last forever. Investors, who believe that good times are here to stay often burn their fingers. 

On a similar note, an over-valued stock has little scope or space for upward movement and could lose its momentum anytime.  

A little bit of research and analysis will help investors make prudent investment choices even in bear market conditions.


http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/financial-times/Investment-tips-Pick-the-right-stock-at-right-time-for-returns/articleshow/6759442.cms

Pick the right stock at right time for returns


Investment tips: Pick the right stock at right time for returns


Stocks
















Picking the right stock at the right time, and booking profits, is a challenge for many small investors. With hardly any time for research and a desire to reap quick profits, many investors often rely on friends and expert advice. The risks are considerable even if you chase a rising stock, without comprehending the driving forces.   How do you differentiate an overheated stock from one that has truly appreciated in its intrinsic value? 


Identifying an under-valued stock 


An under-valued stock is a great investment pick as it has high intrinsic value. Currently under-valued , it has immense potential to rise higher and make the investor richer. 


A low price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio can be an indicator of an under-valued stock. The P/E is calculated by dividing the share price by the company's earnings per share (EPS). EPS is calculated by dividing a company's net revenues by the outstanding shares. A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of net income. So, the stock is more expensive and risky compared to one with a lower P/E ratio. 


Trading volume is an indicator 


Trading volumes can help pick stocks quoted at prices below their true value. In case the trading volume for a stock is low, it can be inferred that it has not caught the attention of many investors. It has a long way to ascend before it touches its true value. A higher trading volume indicates the market is already aware and interested in the stock and hence it is priced close to its true value. 


Debt-to-equity ratio 


A company with high debt-to-equity ratio can indicate forthcoming financial hardships. If the ratio is greater than one, it indicates that assets are mainly financed with debt. If the ratio is less than one, it is a scenario where equity provides majority of the financing. Watch out for stocks that have low debt-to-equity ratio. 


Some other pointers 


Historical data of stocks that have performed consistently and yielded good returns are reliable. A higher profit margin indicates a more profitable company that has better control over its costs compared to its contenders in the same sector. 


Weeding out over-heated stocks 


Avoiding over-priced stocks that could plunge anytime is as critical as picking the right stocks. Buying over-heated stocks and losing money in a bubble burst is not an uncommon phenomenon in the markets. Stocks that have moved up the ladder very quickly are potentially risky. The sudden spurt could be based on a rumour or event not backed by strong fundamentals. 


Good market conditions or bull runs do not last forever. Investors, who believe that good times are here to stay often burn their fingers. On a similar note, an over-valued stock has little scope or space for upward movement and could lose its momentum anytime. 


A little bit of research and analysis will help investors make prudent investment choices even in bear market conditions.




http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/financial-times/Investment-tips-Pick-the-right-stock-at-right-time-for-returns/articleshow/6759442.cms

Dollar plummets on report Fed plans to pump $500bn more into economy

US stock markets recovered on Wednesday as the dollar fell across the board amid further signs the Federal Reserve will increase economic stimulus over the next six months.

The dollar fell across the board on Wednesday amid signs the Federal Reserve will pump $500billion into the economy over the next six months.
The dollar fell across the board on Wednesday amid signs the Federal Reserve will pump $500billion into the economy over the next six months. Photo: Getty Images
 
The Fed’s Beige Book survey on regional business on Wednesday said the US economy expanded at a “modest pace” with little sign of acceleration last month, fueling speculation that central bankers could take further measures to support growth.
Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Chicago-based Harris Private Bank told Bloomberg: “The Beige Book reiterates the call for quantitative easing. The economy is growing, just not accelerating. It remains to be seen what ultimately the Fed buying of bonds will do.”
A report by consulting firm Medley Global Advisors suggested the Fed could start introducing the stimulus as soon as next month, spending $100bn a month on bond purchases. It is understood the Fed has an open-ended commitment to do more over the next 18 months. 

The dollar plummeted to its lowest level against the euro since July, and a 15-year low against the yen. The euro was up 1.06pc at $1.395 and the dollar ended at 81.05 yen. 

Camilla Sutton, Scotia Capital currency strategist, told Reuters: “We think the dollar will end the year weaker, but for now, we're probably going to be in a period of more subdued trading until we get a firmer idea of where policymakers are headed.” 

Meanwhile stocks and commodities recovered after China’s surprise interest rate hike on Tuesday. The Dow Jones industrial average was up 129.35 points, or 1.18pc, at 11,107.97. The Standard and Poor’s 500 Index was up 11.78 points, or 1.05pc, at 1,178.17, with more than 20 companies scheduled to report third-quarter earnings today. The Nasdaq Composite Index was up 20.44 points, or 0.84pc, at 2,457.39. 

Key companies driving the market change included Boeing, whose shares rose 3.35pc after posting a quarterly profit that beat Wall Street’s expectations. Delta Air Lines and US Airways Group also surged after reporting strong profits. 

Web portal Yahoo! rallied 2pc after announcing late on Tuesday that third-quarter net income had more than doubled to $396.1m, or 29 cents a share. 

Wells Fargo, the largest US home lender, climbed 4.28pc after saying it was “eager” to return cash to shareholders following a record quarterly profit. 

Lawrence Creatura, a New York-based fund manager at Federated Investors Inc, told Bloomberg: “We’ve had a variety of company earnings reports which indicate that the sky is not falling. Yesterday was a dark day for the market because of macro factors. Today it will be company management teams’ turn to lead the way again.”



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/8077090/Dollar-plummets-on-report-Fed-plans-to-pump-500bn-more-into-economy.html