Wednesday 7 December 2011

Hospital and Surgical Insurance Claims: The main condition is that the claims must be genuine.

For a painless hospital, surgical stint
Written by Lim Siew May of theedgemalaysia.com
Monday, 19 September 2011 16:29


KUALA LUMPUR: You’ve probably heard horror stories from friends and kin about hospital and surgical (H&S) claims being denied or claim amounts not being entirely reimbursed by their insurers. Industry players stress that insurers do not attempt to minimise payments to claimants.

The main condition is that the claims must be genuine.

“Insurance companies want to be in the business for the long term, and establishing a good reputation is important for us,” says Tan Chue Chau, appointed actuary at Manulife Insurance.

Sharon Chong, managing director of Moneywise Wealth Planning & Consultancy, stresses that insurance companies do not deny claims that are supported by required documents such as medical reports and hospital bills.

Martin Yong, head of life division at State Insurance Brokers, an insurance brokerage firm, says, “It is very straightforward to make an H&S claim. If you’ve declare everything to the best of your knowledge, you will usually be reimbursed. If the insurance company thinks you’re a risky applicant based on your declaration, they would have imposed a loading or not accepted you [as an insured] in the first place.”

Here are the top five reasons why an H&S claim may be denied.

1) The claim is not covered
This problem arises because the claimants are not aware of the exclusion clauses in their policies. “Very often, they’d mistakenly think that a disease is covered, or that they are covered in particular situations,” Yong points out. Insurance agents, when highlighting the benefits of a particular policy to a consumer, should devote some time to explain the exclusions as well.

Congenital conditions, medical or physical abnormalities at the time of birth, are usually excluded, to the surprise of many claimants, says Yong. Most H&S policies do not cover congenital conditions but some insurers do provide them, with conditions on the age of the insured.

“For instance, some insurers state that they do not cover congenital diseases diagnosed before the age of 17. If the claimant is diagnosed after 17, the benefit is payable,” says Chong.

Diagnostic tests are usually not covered as well, though some insurers may pay for certain specified ones. “Insurance exists because most of us are likely to need help to pay for surgery, [and it usually does] not [cover] diagnostic tests,” says Chong.

Another common policy exclusion that is often overlooked is the overseas residence clause. This is pertinent to people who are studying or working abroad for an extended period of time.

“For instance, if you’ve stayed overseas for 90 consecutive days, you will not be compensated if you’re hospitalised anywhere in the world on the 91st day,” explains Chong.

The reasonable and customary charges provision comes into play when a claim is made for treatment received outside the country. In this provision, medical charges should not exceed the general level of charges made by providers of similar standing in Malaysia, Yong explains.

“For instance, say you did a heart surgery is the US, which cost you RM600,000. In Malaysia, the same procedure might only cost you RM100,000. The insurance company will pay you RM100,000, as it is the amount you would have incurred had the surgery been performed in Malaysia,” he says.

2) You have exceeded the coverage limit

Many policyholders are not aware of caps imposed on their medical plans. In addition to a lifetime limit, insurance companies tend to impose an annual limit or an inner limit on H&S policies. For instance, a policy can stipulate a lifetime limit of RM300,000 but limit the amount of claims to RM50,000 a year.

If your actual hospitalisation bill is RM70,000, you would need to pay the difference and you cannot make any claims for the rest of the policy year.
H&S plans that were introduced more than a decade ago may even specify an inner limit.

“For each benefit of your H&S plan, there might be a limit imposed for claims. For example, if your inner limit for surgery is RM20,000, that’s the maximum that you will receive, even if the actual surgical cost is RM50,000,” says Chong.

Fierce competition among insurers has removed the inner limit clause today.

“Now, most medical plans go by the ‘as charged’ basis, which means that the insurer will reimburse the policyholder the amount charged by the hospital. Clearly, this is much better for the policyholder,” says Yong.


It is also common for policyholders to overlook their eligible benefits, such as staying in a more expensive room than the one specified in your plan.

Says Chong, most insurers have a clause stating that if you go beyond your entitlement, you must pay a 20% co-insurance fee (a fixed percentage, usually up to 20%, of the medical bills).

“Some insurers will require those who stay within their entitlement to pay a 10% co-insurance fee and there is a limit on how much they need to pay,” she adds. Others levy an administration fee, says Yong.

Also, check whether your H&S policy stipulates a “deductible”, which is an amount that you have to pay. “Say you’ve opted for a deductible of RM3,000, and your total hospital bill is RM4,000. The insurer will only pay you RM1,000 [RM4,000 – RM3,000],” Tan explains.

3) Failure to disclose pre-existing illnesses


Failure to mention an existing illness is another common reason for the rejection of a claim.

“For instance, you were diagnosed with a disease and went for an operation a few years ago. If you don’t declare it and subsequently make a claim, you will not be paid if the insurer finds out about it,” Yong explains.


4) Coverage has yet to commence

Most insurers impose a waiting period, during which claims for some specified illnesses will not be paid. “For instance, most insurance companies stipulate a 120-day waiting period for illnesses such as hypertension, tumours, cancers and cysts from the day the policy is issued,” says Tan, adding that this waiting period does not extend to accidents.

When upgrading your H&S policy, do not cancel your old plan until the waiting period for the new one has ended, advises Lim Teong Lay, author of Insurance Planning Guide for Malaysians.

5) Failing to pay your premiums on time
Needless to say, you won’t be covered if you’ve not been remitting your premiums on time. Tan says a policy lapse a month after the premium due date.

Medical plans that ride on a basic life insurance policy or investment-linked policy usually have a surrender value or an investment value that will pay for H&S coverage if the policyholder fails to pay the premiums. Once this underlying value is exhausted, all benefits will be void and claims will not be paid out, says Yong.


http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/personal-finance/193112-for-a-painless-hospital-surgical-stint.html

Number of wealthy Malaysians to double by 2015

Number of wealthy Malaysians to double by 2015
Written by Joanne Nayagam
Thursday, 15 September 2011 11:45


KUALA LUMPUR: In its first Asia Wealth Report released this year, private banking group Bank Julius Baer expects the number of high net worth individuals (HNWIs) in Malaysia to grow from 32,000 currently to 68,000 in 2015. Their net worth is expected to increase from US$140 billion (RM433 billion) to US$330 billion.

“We see that Asia is growing in a very dynamic way, accounting for almost 40% of global GDP alone if you basically look at China and India as of today,” said Dr Thomas Meier, Julius Baer CEO for Asia, in an interview with The Edge Financial Daily.

Because wealth is generated in growing economies, said Meier, it is natural for the group to understand how this wealth is translated to different individuals.

The report, prepared in cooperation with CLSA, was based on client surveys and interviews covering topics such as environment, philanthropy, investing, lifestyle and education and shows how Asia’s HNWIs view the world.

The key findings of the report include Julius Baer’s forecast that China and India alone will contribute over 40% of the global GDP growth for 2011 and 2012.

It also estimated a doubling of the number HNWIs across Asia from 1.16 million to 2.82 million as their wealth triples from US$5.06 trillion to US$15.81 trillion by 2015.

China alone is forecast to have 1.4 million HNWIs with a stock of wealth of US$8.76 trillion by 2015.


Growth in Malaysia will be broad-based and job creating.

Indonesia stood out with the highest growth rate in terms of number of HNWIs over the five-year period, rising from 33,000 to 99,000 with a stock of wealth of US$487 billion.

Four key factors will drive the rise in HNWIs in Malaysia.

The first is the country’s strong and stable long-term fundamental GDP growth derived from trade and agriculture, and increasingly the finance and banking sector, said David Lim, Julius Baer CEO for Singapore.

“The wealth report agrees that growth in Malaysia will be broad-based. It will be job creating. There will a lot more engagement of Malaysia with Asean and a reduction in the reliance of Malaysia on the Western markets,” he said.

The second factor is Asia’s strong currencies, which Julius Baer believes will continue to strengthen.

Asian currencies will not only benefit from their countries’ strong reserves but also rising inflow of foreign direct investments.

Furthermore, a stronger currency will also provide more “fire power” for asset acquisition abroad. “There will be that money flow back to Malaysia,” said Lim.

The other two factors are asset price appreciation from real estate and equities.

Equally important for HNWIs is understanding what needs to be done to sustain their lifestyle from a consumption and investment perspective.

One of the key components to determine a financial plan is the cost of goods and because HNWIs do not draw from the same basket of 20 items as many others, the report will help them plan for the long haul. For this, the Swiss private bank launched the Julius Baer Lifestyle Index, which captures the consumption costs in Asia Pacific and the inherent inflation.

The 20 items in the basket used for the index include high-value items from wedding expenses to wine and cars to legal costs, cigars and education.

“It is the cost of living the life of the rich,” said Meier.

The index covers price changes from April 2010 to April 2011, and is an aggregate of price changes sampled from Shanghai, Mumbai, Singapore and Hong Kong.

For the one-year to April 2011, the index was up 11.7% outpacing conventional consumer price index measures, which stood at 5.1% over the same period.

The rising number of HNWIs will also benefit luxury brands expanding in Asia. “Luxury goods and established brands will benefit from this wealth,” said Meier.

The key is brand reputation and management to get a brand into an iconic position said Lim.

Julius Baer was a sponsor in the Forbes CEO Global Conference which was held here over the past few days. The bank is present in Asia with offices in Singapore, Hong Kong and Indonesia.


This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily, September 15, 2011.

Recession-proof fashion retailers do better than others during a bear market

Recession-proof fashion retailers do better than others during a bear market
Written by Lim Siew May of theedgemalaysia.com
Tuesday, 06 December 2011 09:43


KUALA LUMPUR: In Malaysia, only three home-grown fashion brands — Padini Holdings Bhd, Bonia Corp Bhd and Voir Holdings Bhd — are listed on Bursa Malaysia, but they have been surprisingly resilient. Each remained profitable during the 2008 financial crisis.

Padini Holdings Bhd, which is widely covered by analysts, was the first retailer to list, doing so in 1998. It retails fashionwear and accessories through its brands — Seed, Vincci, P&Co, PDI, Padini Authentics Miki and Padini.

In early November, it boasted the highest market capitalisation [among the three] of RM657.91 million, and profits have been growing consistently y-o-y from 2001 to 2010. It has consistently paid out dividends of at least 30% of its net income, and for FY2011, it is expected to distribute RM26.3 million (34.7%) out of its net profit of RM75.7 million.


The market capitalisation of Bonia Corp Bhd, which retails branded leatherwear, footwear as well as men’s apparel and accessories, is about half of Padini’s at RM328.56 million. It made a net profit of RM33.55 million for FY2010. The company owns the Bonia, Sembonia and Carlo Rino brands and the licence for international labels including Santa Barbara Polo and Valentino Rudy.


Voir Holdings Bhd has the smallest market capitalisation of RM60.60 million. The company owns brands such as VOIR, Applemints and SODA as well as licensed international brand Diadora. Besides selling women’s apparel, shoes and accessories, the company also designs and sells clothes for men and children. It made a net profit of RM7.7 million for FY2010.


Compared with luxury fashion houses listed in Hong Kong, local fashion stocks are much cheaper. The three companies are trading at price-earning ratios (PERs) of between 8.42 times and 8.75 times. In comparison, Italian luxury brand Prada SpA, which listed in Hong Kong in June, is trading at 28 times.

Recession-proof?


The possibility of a double-dip recession for the global economy is certainly alarming but the stock market will offer great bargains. Certain resilient industries do better than others during a bear market.

There are two opposing schools of thought on the prospects of non-utilitarian stocks such as fashion during a recession. On one hand, branded wear can be seen as luxury, not a basic need, which is eliminated from a tightened budget.

The opposing view is that people tend to seek an escape from hard times and are more likely to indulge in shopping. The latter helps to explain the resilience of Padini, Voir and Bonia during the last financial crisis.


An analyst, who requests anonymity, is sanguine about the local fashion stocks. “Malaysians love sales. Fashion companies can spur customer spending via sales and promotions, even though they do incur marketing costs. I believe that our middle-class fashion range will fare better than high-end fashion stocks in Hong Kong, given their affordability.”


A consumer-sector analyst, however, is cautious: “Fashion is not a staple. I believe the sector will be affected by the current conditions in the global economy. People will hold back during uncertain times.”
Here are ways to evaluate a solid fashion stock, regardless of whether we will see a global.

Branding counts


Branding is said to be the most important component of a fashion retailer. “Everyone has heard of Padini. It is available at almost every retail outlets across the Klang Valley, and people usually prefer to stick to an established brand,” says the first analyst.

“Padini offers a wide range of products for various market segments, and they are affordably priced. When a fresh graduate needs to buy working clothes, he buys from Padini instead of foreign fashion brands such as Zara, which costs 50% more.”


Is the company actively growing its brand? This is reflected by mergers and acquisitions as well as decisions to spend 2% to 3% of its revenue on marketing initiatives and/or aggressive openings of more outlets. “Organic growth will not result in a premium valuation for fashion stocks,” says the analyst.


A HwangDBS Vickers Research report indicates that there is a correlation between a newly opened store and the company’s revenue stream. For instance, when Padini expanded its retail space by more than 50%, or 143,955 sq ft, in 2008.

Padini is setting its sights on rural areas like Sabah, where there is enhanced purchasing power. The group has started selling its affordably priced garments in the Brands Outlet in Suria Sabah in Kota Kinabalu, 1st Avenue Mall in Penang, as well as 1Borneo Shopping Mall and 1 Multi-Concept Store in Sabah.

“Residents don’t really have access to swanky and established malls. I believe Padini should perform relatively well there,” says the analyst. Brands Outlet, a Padini standalone store, has been instrumental in driving the company’s revenue growth, contributing a compounded annual growth rate of 85% since its debut in 2007, says the HwangDBS Vickers Research report.


Starting a standalone store is also a good move for the fashion company. “When you move beyond [renting space in a department store], you will have more space and better control over your operations. And if your brand is the anchor tenant, you can probably negotiate for favourable rental terms,” says the consumer-sector analyst.

Increasing same-store sales


Same-store sales are used in the retail industry to reflect the difference in revenue generated by the retail chain’s existing outlets over a certain period of time. This statistic differentiates between sales generated from new stores and those from existing stores.

“This metric shows the organic growth of a store. New outlets usually reach their peaks after three or four years, then you won’t see fantastic double-digit growth,” says the analyst.

Growth of same-store sales reflects the management’s acumen in predicting fashion trends while the reverse signifies inaccurate expectations or a saturated market.


Unfortunately, growth figures are not readily accessible to retail investors, although analyst’s reports or news reports may feature them. To compensate, evaluate the company’s financial performance.

“It all boils down to the company’s ability to give its customers what they want. Look at the big picture. You can assess its ability to meet customers’ demand through the sales figures in the financial statements. You can also go to the stores and observe the foot traffic,” suggests the analyst.



Expect months of lower sales. According to HwangDBS Vickers Research’s report, Padini sees lower sales during non-festive seasons, such as in 2Q2011. However, the report explains that this is a common characteristic of the retail industry.

Stocks and threats



Holding a high volume of inventory for a long time is not a good sign for a fashion retailer. Inventory takes up storage space and affects liquidity. High inventory may also compel a company to significantly mark down its out-of-season stocks, leading to compressed margins.


To cater for festive celebrations such as Christmas and Chinese New Year, there will be a surge in inventory, the analyst says. “The inventory volume depends heavily on the management’s view. If it takes a sanguine view of the economy, it will increase stocks accordingly.



“However, if a great deal of the inventory in December does not translate into sales by March or April, it can mean a weak quarterly financial performance for the company.”



Rising raw-material (such as cotton) costs and the minimum wage hike in China are some of the key threats facing fashion retailers around the world. Gross margin, which measures the percentage of each ringgit of revenue retained as gross profit, is used to evaluate the management’s ability to manage cost.

The higher it is, the more the company is able to retain each ringgit of revenue to meet other business costs and obligations. A reduced gross margin can be a result of plunging revenue and/or increased business costs — all of which impact earnings.


http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/personal-finance/197332-malaysians-love-shopping-so-recession-proof-fashion-retailers-do-better-than-others-during-a-bear-market.html

Sell bonds and buy equities? Maybe not

Sell bonds and buy equities? Maybe not
Written by Celine Tan of theedgemalaysia.com
Tuesday, 06 December 2011 09:40



KUALA LUMPUR: Which was the best asset class in the first three quarters of 2011?

Given the volatility on Bursa Malaysia’s Main Board, it may not be surprising that the local bond and money-market funds performed better than equity funds in the one-year period ended October 28 (see table), but still, the institutional investors were caught flat-footed.

“This [underperformance of equities] was not expected early in the year. But seeing how the Greek sovereign debt issue has remained unresolved and the situations that followed the US’ credit rating downgrade, the underperformance is not a surprise [now],” says Koh Huat Soon, chief investment officer of Pacific Mutual Fund Bhd.

Similarly, Azian Abu Bakar, executive director of Apex Investment Services Bhd, did not expect bond portfolios to outperform their equity counterparts until Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) hiked interest rates and the macroeconomic situations in developed economies kept “turning turtle”. BNM hiked the overnight policy rate by 25 basis points to 3% in May.

Throughout the year, the local bourse’s performance was mainly news-driven. “The poor performance of equity funds was due to major sell-offs in 3Q2011, as investors sought refuge and shifted to safer assets such as bonds and money-market instruments,” says Yeoh Mei Kei, research analyst at Fundsupermart.com.

Koh says the local bond market benefited from foreign investments while Azian attributes demand for sukuk issued during the year. For both, the interest-rate hike in May was also a factor.

The equity funds’ performance was attributed to the bearish sentiment on the local equity market throughout the year, says Azian. “Generally, the performance of the banking sector affected conventional equity portfolios. Islamic equity portfolios were impacted by the doldrums in the plantation sector and, to some extent, the construction sector.”

What to do?
Everyone has heard of the old adage — what goes up must come down. “We advise investors — be they conservative or aggressive — to rebalance their portfolios from winning positions [bond and money-market funds] to losing positions [equity funds],” says Yeoh.

“This prevents investors’ portfolios from [suffering a] ‘style drift’, which means a divergence from the original investment objective or investment style. Also, it forces investors to be disciplined and to manage their emotions when investing.”

Koh suggests switching to European equities. “The eurozone had bought more time to resolve their crisis. This region managed to avoid a messy default in the near term. Since many equity funds are holding cash, the potential for short-term gains is there.”


But this move requires a stomach for risk and constant surveillance of the situation in Europe. Key risks — such as the success of austerity measures in countries such as Greece and inadequate amounts of bail-out funds — remain.


This means that conservative investors should hold on to their performing bonds and money-market funds as equities are likely to remain very volatile, given the uncertainly in the global economy. Institutional investors are also likely to take their time before acquiring equities.

“Most asset managers have implemented trading or benchmarking tactics. This conservative approach is taken in lieu of the global uncertainty,” says Azian.

Maybank assets under custody set to grow 20%


Wednesday December 7, 2011


KUALA LUMPUR: Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank) expects its new eCustody service to grow assets under custody by 20% next year, from RM50bil at June 30 this year.
eCustody is an online module within Maybank’s enterprise cash management portal, Maybank2E.net.
Deputy president and head of global wholesale banking Abdul Farid Alias said that Maybank’s local and international assets under custody stood at RM37bil at June 30, 2010.
“Transaction banking services are a growing revenue driver for the Maybank group. In the financial year ended June 30, 2011, transaction banking revenue grew 9% (and) custody services recorded growth of 10% for the past five years.
Revenue driver: Wong (left) and Farid at the launch of eCustody, which is expected to increase Maybank’s custody services revenue by at least 20%.
“Now, we are expecting revenue from custody services to grow by at least 20% in the coming year with eCustody,” Farid said at the launch of eCustody.
He said Maybank had been putting up building blocks and that the new service provided the final link for the group to provide a complete, single platform for electronic transaction banking.
Farid said the bank currently had 126 custody clients and expected to convert 60% of them to the eCustody platform by end-2012.
He said Maybank already had a sizeable presence in trade finance with a market share, in terms of volume, of 24% and 30% in cash management.
Managing director (transaction banking, global wholesale banking) John Wong explained that eCustody was already iPad-enabled and that the next phase would be introduced in March for BlackBerry and Android-based devices.
Wong assured that eCustody was a secure system, saying it required dual authentication whereby a client would be given a “token” that generates a password on top of his password.
He said eCustody would be one of the enablers for Maybank to take its electronic transaction banking platform regional. The system, Wong said, had gone live in Cambodia and was being planned for roll-out in Indonesia and Singapore next year.
He said Indonesia would be enabled with eCustody by June 2012, followed by Singapore and subsequently Greater China to cater to key Asean market.
Farid said owing to the bank’s extensive network in the region, it saw an opportunity to extend its electronic transaction banking services regionally. “This will incorporate not only custody services but also cash management and trade finance via a single platform.”

Small investment banks must shape up to survive


Wednesday December 7, 2011

Plain Speaking - By Yap Leng Kuen

THE rush by banking groups to expand into investment banking (IB) business has somewhat put the smaller IB outfits into a spot.
What is going to happen to them once all the big boys have gotten their IB act together? Will they be swallowed or is there still a place and role for them?
One important role the smaller IBs can play is that of independent financial advisor (IFA). Many banking groups that already lend to their customers seeking IB services may not be able to undertake the role of IFA.
That is where smaller but credible IB houses can play a significant role.
Following the proposed merger between RHB Capital and OSK Holdings Bhd, a lot of attention has been given to the fate of the next largest standalone IBs, which are K&N Kenanga Holdings Bhd and Hwang DBS Investment Bank.
K&N Kenanga was in the news, with reports speculating that it was looking to buy the IB business of the ECM Libra financial group.
While nothing conclusive has come out of it, that piece of market talk was enough to fuel further curiosity over K&N Kenanga's plans. Meanwhile, Hwang DBS is keeping very quiet over its plans amidst these recent developments.
While they may be focused on being niche players, these smaller IBs may have to be content with getting smaller deals or just end up as partners with the bigger IBs in major transactions.
A bigger bank-backed group will have the balance sheet to undertake larger transactions. One notable case is the Maybank/Kim Eng partnership that will enable Kim Eng to expand the regional IB business via more investments from Maybank and also to undertake bigger transactions based on the balance sheet and customer base that Maybank has regionally.
Kim Eng is already a successful regional player in six out of 10 Asean countries with international presence in Hong Kong, New York and London. It made a pre-tax profit of S$128.9mil for the year from June 2010 to July 2011. But it recognises the forces of globalisation and the need for further strength in times of crisis.
That does not mean the smaller IBs cannot survive the onslaught of liberalisation and tough times.
They will have to work harder to maintain their strong reputation, client network and marketing skills. While shaping up, they may make themselves beautiful enough to attract some good suitors.
In the case of Kim Eng, it had to be attractive enough to get a big buyer like Maybank that paid a whopping S$1.79bil or 1.9 times book value for the Singapore-based IB that has the top brokerage position in Thailand.
When the CIMB investment banking group bought GK Goh for S$239.14mil back in 2005, it paid 1.3 times book value.
As the offers go higher and supply gets scarce, there is a chance for the smaller but good IBs to fetch a favourable exit price.
Thus lie the challenges for these IBs amidst interesting times.

  • Associate editor Yap Leng Kuen thinks that ideally, there should be a place in the sun for everyone.














  • http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/12/7/business/10045706&sec=business



  • Mixed views on private retirement scheme in Malaysia


    Wednesday December 7, 2011

    By TEE LIN SAY 

    linsay@thestar.com.my

    PETALING JAYA: Fund managers are mixed on the feasibility of setting up a private retirement scheme (PRS), as they need to know how it is governed and how different it is from a typical unit trust.
    On Monday, the Securities Commission (SC) finalised the eligibility requirements for PRS providers. The recent enactment of the Capital Markets and Services Amendment Act 2011 provides the regulatory framework for a PRS industry, including empowering the SC to approve the providers.
    MCIS Zurich Insurance Bhd fixed income head Michael Chang said that as the PRS initiative was relatively new and complemented existing social security funds, there were a number of questions that would be raised by potential investors.
    “If it is not mandatory, how would these funds have decent investable sizes? How would one PRS be different from another? Size of an investment fund matters as you are able to reduce the investment costs for the benefit of investors,” Chang said.
    He added that PRS providers would have to offer more compelling retirement returns than the mandatory ones. Also, it has to be attractive enough, more so than an insurance fund.
    “An insurance fund does both: provides protection and savings. Retirement funds then have to ensure the returns generated at retirement are sufficiently available to the retiree for a comfortable living,” he said.
    Chang pointed out that most investors these days could already asset-allocate on their own via unit trust funds or private banking expertise.
    “So the selling point has to be more convincing. I mean we are relying on the asset allocation of PRS providers, hoping what they do gives you a reasonable return upon retirement.” he said.
    Fortress Capital Asset Management (M) Sdn Bhd chief executive officer Thomas Yong feels that the move was healthy and in line with international practices.
    “As people become more financially sophisticated, there is no reason to limit what they want to invest in. It is always good to have different providers.
    “Instead of letting someone dictate how much dividends you get per annum, now you can decide on your own,” said Yong.
    Yong feels that there will be many that would want to provide these services.
    According to the SC, a select number of suitably qualified and experienced providers with the required expertise in pension or retail fund management would be approved to offer PRS schemes with an appropriate range of dedicated retirement funds catering to different investment and risk profiles.
    Applicants will be assessed on their financial standing and organisational capabilities, including meeting relevant capital requirements, internal controls and risk management practices.

    Keeping it in family breeds billionaires


    Matt Wade
    December 6, 2011

    Samsung ... identified as Asia's biggest family business.
    Samsung ... identified as Asia's biggest family business. Photo: Reuters
    It must be tough keeping tally of billionaires in China.
    The Hurun magazine, which ranks China's wealthy, counted 271 US dollar billionaires in this year's rich list, more than double last year's total. Liang Wengen, a 55-year-old construction equipment magnate from Hunan, topped the rankings with an estimated fortune of $US11 billion. At this rate it won't be long before China surpasses America's billionaire count of about 400.
    India lags China in billionaire numbers - 57 according the latest rich list published by Forbes - but it boasts more tycoons in the world's top 100. India-born businessmen fill seven places on that list compared with just one from China - the internet entrepreneur Robin Li, who came in at number 95. India even had two citizens in the Forbes top 10 - the London-based steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal and industrialist Mukesh Ambani, owner of the world's most expensive house.
    Asia's bulging cohort of billionaires is one indicator of the region's growing economic might - it now has more billionaires than Europe.
    But another factor is the success of Asia's big family-owned companies. Credit Suisse studied more than 3500 listed family-controlled firms with market capitalisations of more than $50 million in 10 major Asian economies and found they made up about half of all listed companies.
    The total market capitalisation of the family firms studied was equal to 34 per cent of Asia's total nominal gross domestic product.
    The biggest family business identified in the study was South Korea's Samsung, which accounted for 10.3 per cent of the country's market capitalisation. Second was Mukesh Ambani's conglomerate Reliance.
    The researchers concluded family businesses "are the backbone of the Asian economies". They found listed family firms outperformed local benchmarks in seven of the 10 countries studied and that total market capitalisation of Asian family businesses expanded about six-fold between 2000 and 2010.
    Asia's big family companies have some common traits. Many are large conglomerates like India's Tata Sons, which controls more than 100 companies across a host of sectors including steel, vehicles, telecoms, beverages and IT.
    Credit Suisse said Asia's family businesses avoided high-risk investment strategies and favoured borrowing from banks rather than issuing corporate bonds.
    Many management decisions were also underpinned by "Asian values", especially the tradition of passing on leadership to heirs.
    But the study also identified some significant differences.
    In the Philippines family businesses accounted for 83 per cent of total market capitalisation compared with just 11 per cent in China, where state-owned enterprises dominate the economy.
    In India family firms with market capitalisation of more than $50 million made up 67 per cent of listed companies, the highest proportion in Asia. China had just 13 per cent.
    Tax payments underscore the influence of big family businesses in India. They contribute about 40 per cent of corporate tax and 18 per cent of all tax revenue collected.
    The Godrej Group is typical of many family-owned conglomerates in India. Its core business is consumer products, especially whitegoods, but it also has an array of spin-off businesses including engineering, agribusiness and a fast-growing property development business. The chairman, Adi Godrej (net worth nearly $US7 billion), says big family conglomerates make sense in a country like India.
    "It creates financial stability and the opportunity to introduce the best business management practices," he told me in a recent interview. "We have married best practice with very focused companies within a group that is able to add a lot of value in a developing country."
    Will Asia's dynasties be able to maintain their clout?
    The complexity of international finance means they are relying increasingly on professional managers. Inheritance is difficult to manage and many big family firms struggle with succession.
    The influence of family-controlled businesses is likely to fade eventually. But they will produce plenty more billionaires in the meantime.


    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/keeping-it-in-family-breeds-billionaires-20111205-1ofem.html#ixzz1fl5ATTRE

    Comparing equity yields with term deposits is lazy


    Marcus Padley
    December 3, 2011

    I have been getting a little bit irritated by the constant comparisons between the yield on equities and the yield on a bond or term deposit.
    The argument goes that equity yields are now higher than bond yields and also higher than term deposits, so you should switch.
    But the truth is that a comparison of the returns on term deposits or bonds with equity yields is simply lazy and ridiculous and reckless, because it misses the point about why people are in term deposits in the first place.
    Let me explain by taking a well-known income stock - the National Australia Bank, one of the highest-yielding and safest blue-chip stocks in the market. The yield on the NAB is 7.5 per cent - 10.7 per cent including franking. That, everyone will tell you, is cheap and the argument is that all you mugs holding term deposits earning just 5.5 per cent are idiots because you get a whole extra 2.2 per cent in the NAB or 5.2 per cent including franking.
    Fair enough, until you consider this exercise.
    Get a chart up of the NAB over the last year (one year will do). Now mark off the peaks and troughs since January and calculate how many and how big the variations have been. You will find that the NAB has had 10 fluctuations. Five rallies and five falls.
    The size of the rallies has been +12.8 per cent, +17.8 per cent, +8.3 per cent, +23.2 per cent and +26.9 per cent. The falls have been -9.8 per cent, -15.3 per cent, -23.9 per cent, -13.5 per cent and -18.7 per cent and if we picked a smaller-income stock or took NAB out over a longer period, it would be even more dramatic.
    Now tell me after 10 moves of more than 7.5 per cent in just a year that I should be worrying about the 7.5 per cent yield on the NAB. Now tell me, amid that volatility and instability, that I should mention the yield on the NAB and the yield on a risk-free term deposit or bond in the same breath. Now tell me the prudence behind selling my term deposit and buying the NAB.
    The NAB and almost all other income stocks in the current market, are not stable low-risk investments; they are volatile trading stocks and the message is clear and let's make it clearer, once and for all. You cannot compare the yield on an equity to the yield on a bond because one includes no risk of a capital loss (no risk of a gain either) and the other contains a currently huge perceived risk of a capital loss (or gain).
    Promoting income stocks because they yield more than a bond is ignoring that extra risk and misunderstanding why people are now in bonds and term deposits. They are there because they don't want to lose any more money. Because they don't want volatility.
    The only way to compare equities to bonds or equities to term deposits is if the equities came with a price guarantee, which they don't, or if you compare risk-free yields with the expected total return from equities, which includes the extra volatility and risk and not just the dividends.
    In the current market, equities are nothing like a bond or term deposit because share-price risk is dominating the investment decision not the yield. Do you really think people are in term deposits to make 5.5 per cent? No, they are in term deposits to avoid losing money. The focus is on the risk not the return. Risk rules.
    But it's not all gloom. The good news is that this is not a normal state of affairs. The sharemarket is supposed to be about opportunity not risk and the fact that risk is so in focus means the opportunity side of the equation is being ignored.
    Also, risk can change very quickly. Ahead of the last European Union summit the market jumped 11 per cent in four days on lower perceived equity risk. The banks jumped 19.2 per cent. If the GFC doesn't reignite, the focus is going to very rapidly swing back to yields and price-to-earnings (PE) ratios. If the GFC is behind us, how long do you think the NAB is going to trade on a 10.7 per cent yield and the market on a PE of 10.7 times against a long-term average of 14 times?
    Not long. In which case the game now is not debating the marginal merits of term deposits versus equities but waiting for a chink of light in the outlook for risk, because that is all that matters and because when it appears, the herd is going to smash down the door to get to those yields and PEs.
    At the moment they don't believe in them. Your job is to be on the ball on the day they do.
    Marcus Padley is a stockbroker with Patersons Securities and the author of sharemarket newsletter Marcus Today. His views do not necessarily reflect those of Patersons.


    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/money/investing/comparing-equity-yields-with-term-deposits-is-lazy-20111202-1oakh.html#ixzz1flIYoklV

    It's actually growth that determines value. You can't encapsulate the inherent value of a business in a P/E ratio.

    Some of the market's biggest winners were trading at prices above 30 times earnings before they made their move.

    A stock with a P/E below 10 may be a better deal than another trading at a P/E above 20. But then again it might not. 

    The point is, when you become a part owner in a company, you have a claim not just on today's earnings, but all future profits as well. The faster the company is growing, the more that future cash flow stream is worth to shareholders.

    That's why Warren Buffett likes to say that "growth and value are joined at the hip."

    You can't encapsulate the inherent value of a business in a P/E ratio.  It's actually growth that determines value.  

    The PEG ratio is used to evaluate a stock's valuation while taking into account earnings growth. A rule of thumb is that a PEG of 1.0 indicates fair value, less than 1.0 indicates the stock is undervalued, and more than 1.0 indicates it's overvalued.  Here's how it works:

    If Stock ABC is trading with a P/E ratio of 25, a value investor might deem it "expensive." But if its earnings growth rate is projected to be 30%, its PEG ratio would be 25 / 30 PEG.83. The PEG ratio says that Stock ABC is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

    It is important to realize that relying on one metric alone will almost never give you an accurate measure of value. Being able to use and interprete a number of measures will give you a better idea of the whole picture when evaluating a stock's performance and potential. 


    Why We Look at the PEG Ratio

    One of the more popular ratios stock analysts look at is the P/E, or price to earnings, ratio. The drawback to a P/E ratio is that it does not account for growth. A low P/E may seem like a positive sign for the stock, but if the company is not growing, its stock's value is also not likely to rise. The PEG ratio solves this problem by including a growth factor into its calculation. PEG is calculated by dividing the stock's P/E ratio by its expected 12 month growth rate. 

    How to Score the PEG Ratio
    Pass—Give the PEG Ratio a passing score if its value is less than 1.0.
    Fail—Give the PEG Ratio a failing score if its value is greater than 1.0.