Showing posts with label retained earnings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label retained earnings. Show all posts

Thursday 30 August 2012

LPI - Return on Retained Earnings

LPI

(Figures are in sens)

Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 9 14.4 5.4
2003 9 17.6 8.6
2004 10.8 25.8 15
2005 34.6 32.3 -2.3
2006 32.4 33.8 1.4
2007 48.2 38 -10.2
2008 48.8 45.1 -3.7
2009 40.5 54.5 14
2010 26.5 62.3 35.8
2011 70 70.13 0.13
Total 329.8 393.93 64.13
2002-2011
DPO 84%
EPS increase (sen) 55.7
Return on retained earnings  87%

Public Bank - Return on Retained Earnings

Public Bank

(Figures are in sens)

Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 9.5 25.5 16
2003 9.9 30 20.1
2004 42.8 36.2 -6.6
2005 48.3 40.7 -7.6
2006 37.9 47.8 9.9
2007 45.5 60.7 15.2
2008 56.7 69.5 12.8
2009 40.1 71.9 31.8
2010 37.2 87 49.8
2011 46.8 99.5 52.7
Total 374.7 568.8 194.1
2002-2011
DPO 66%
EPS increase (sen) 74.0
Return on retained earnings  38%

Padini - Return on Retained Earnings

Padini

(Figures are in sens)

Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 0.2 1 0.8
2003 0.5 1.6 1.1
2004 0.6 1 0.4
2005 1.1 2.6 1.5
2006 1.4 4.4 3
2007 2.2 4.8 2.6
2008 2.7 6.3 3.6
2009 2.7 7.5 4.8
2010 3 9.3 6.3
2011 4 11.5 7.5
Total 18.4 50 31.6
2002-2011
DPO 37%
EPS increase 10.50
Return on retained earnings  33%

Wednesday 29 August 2012

Nestle - Return on Retained Earnings

Nestle

(Figures are in sens)

Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 98.5 63.2 -35.3
2003 70.2 81.5 11.3
2004 75.2 94 18.8
2005 80.2 114 33.8
2006 95 113 18
2007 100 124.5 24.5
2008 190 145.4 -44.6
2009 130 150 20
2010 150 166.9 16.9
2011 170 194.6 24.6
Total 1159.1 1247.1 88
2002-2011
DPO 0.93
EPS increase 131.40
Return on retained earnings  149% Thumbs Up

Guinness - Return on Retained Earnings

Guinness

(Figures are in sens)
Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 27.4 24 -3.4
2003 28.1 25.8 -2.3
2004 30.4 32.6 2.2
2005 30.1 35.7 5.6
2006 30.2 42.4 12.2
2007 32.9 37.3 4.4
2008 36.4 41.7 5.3
2009 41 47 6
2010 45 50.5 5.5
2011 54 60 6
Total 355.5 397 41.5
2002-2011
DPO 0.90
EPS increase 36.00
Return on retained earnings  87% Thumbs Up

Genting Malaysia - Return on Retained Earnings

Genting Malaysia (GENM)

(Figures are in sens)

Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2002 2.3 11 8.7
2003 2.5 9.2 6.7
2004 2.6 13.6 11
2005 3 15.4 12.4
2006 3.7 17 13.3
2007 4.2 19.2 15
2008 4.8 24 19.2
2009 5.3 23.4 18.1
2010 5.9 23.8 17.9
2011 6.2 25.22 19.02
Total 40.5 181.82 141.32
2002-2011
DPO 0.22
EPS increase 14.22
Return on retained earnings  10%Thumbs DownThumbs Down

Petronas Dagangan - Return on Retained Earnings

Petronas Dagangan

(Figures are in sens)
Year DPS EPS Retained EPS
2003 10.8 15 4.2
2004 7.2 19.2 12
2005 10.8 21.2 10.4
2006 14.4 50.9 36.5
2007 21.9 64.5 42.6
2008 33.5 66.6 33.1
2009 36 58.3 22.3
2010 63.8 75.8 12
2011 75 87.6 12.6
Total 273.4 459.1 185.7

From 2003-2011
DPO
0.60
EPS increase 72.60
Return on retained earnings  39%Thumbs Up

The Magic of Dutch Lady: Measuring management's ability to profitably allocate earnings.

Depicted below are the 12 years financial statistics of Dutch Lady.

Dutch Lady


Date DPS EPS Retained EPS
1999 0 15.9 15.9
2000 4.5 21.7 17.2
2001 5.8 18.7 12.9
2002 5.8 23.7 17.9
2003 12.8 24.2 11.4
2004 56 26.6 -29.4
2005 63.2 42.4 -20.8
2006 63.2 67.3 4.1
2007 42.1 73.8 31.7
2008 65.6 66.6 1
2009 72.5 94.4 21.9
2010 72.5 119 46.5
Total 464 594.3 130.3

1999-2010
DPO 0.78
EPS increase 103.1 
Return on retained earnings  79.1%Thumbs Up


We can observe that for the last 12 years (year 1999 to year 2010), the management of Dutch Lady:

1.  has earned a total of 594.3 sen per share
2.  has distributed a total of 464 sen per share, giving a DPO ratio of 78.1%.
3.  has retained a total of 130.3 sen per share as retained earnings.
4.  has increased its EPS by 103.1 sen per share ( 119 - 15.9 = 103.1) from 1999 of 15.9 sen per share to 119 sen per share in 2010.



How do we as investors measure a company and its management's ability to profitably allocate (unrestricted) earnings?

We can do this by taking the per share earnings retained by a business for a certain period of time, then compare it to any increase in per share earnings that occurred during this same period.  

Thus, the management of Dutch Lady has used the retained EPS of 130.3 sen per share to grow its earnings by 103.1 sen per share from 1999 to 2010..  

Therefore, the management of Dutch Lady has earned a 79.1%Thumbs Up( = 103.1 / 130.3) return in 2010, on the 130.3 sen a share that Dutch Lady retained from the year 1999 to 2010.
Even if we have no idea of the business of Dutch Lady, we can still safely conclude that Dutch Lady has done a great job of profitably allocating its retained earnings.

This test is not perfect.  One must be careful that the per share earnings figures used are not aberrations.  One has to make sure that the per share figures used are indicative of any real increase or decrease in earning power.  

The advantage to this test is that is gives you, the investor, a really fast method of determining whether or not a company and its management have the ability to allocate retained earnings in a fashion that increases the wealth of the company's shareholders.

Tuesday 1 May 2012

You should seek companies that can create the equivalent market value for each $1 of retained earnings, for the shareholders

Guinness Anchor

Year    DPS   EPS

2001    27.4    19.4
2002    27.4    24.0
2003    28.1    25.8
2004    30.4    32.6
2005    30.1    35.7
2006    30.2    42.4
2007     32.9   37.3
2008     36.4   41.7
2009     41.0   47.0
2010     45.0   50.5
Total    328.9  356.4

From the year 2001 to 2010
Total dividend paid out  328.9 sen
Total earnings 356.4 sen
Total retained earnings  27.5 sen



Price Range of each Guinness Share
2001  Low $ 2.75 -  High $ 3.58
2010  Low $ 6.60 -  High $ 10.16

Subtracting the highest price of 2001 from the lowest price of 2010, the gain in the share price of Guinness from 2001 to 2010 was $3.02  ($6.60 - $3.58 = $3.02 )

The change market price of Guinness from 2001 to 2010 was a minimum of $3.02.

Therefore, for every $1.00 of retained earnings, Guinness has created at least $3.02/ $0.275 = $10.98 in market value, that is, for every 10 sen retained earnings, Guinness has created a market value of a minimum of $1.098.



How does the company use the retained earnings?  Do the retained earnings reflect in the stock price?


When the management of a company invests earnings back into the business, that investment should yield a higher return because of those retained earnings.  When the management does a great job using retained earnings, it will increase the earnings of that company, and , in turn, earnings per share will increase.

Market price does not always reflect the true value of the company during the short term.  But, if you are looking at 10 years or more, market price reflects the true value of the company.

In the above example, using Guinness, the last 10 years of EPS were added and compared with the market price of the stock in those years.

Warren Buffett teaches that you should seek out those companies that can grow at least the equivalent $1.00 of market value for each $1.00 of retained earnings.  To not do so, the company is destroying value.

Thursday 1 March 2012

Buffett's Big 4 Investments in Marketable Securities - American Express, Coca Cola, IBM and Wells Fargo


-  Finally, we made two major investments in marketable securities:

  • (1) a $5 billion 6% preferred stock of Bank of America that came with warrants allowing us to buy 700 million common shares at $7.14 per share any time before September 2, 2021; and 
  • (2) 63.9 million shares of IBM that cost us $10.9 billion
Counting IBM, we now have large ownership interests in four exceptional companies:

  • 13.0% of American Express, 
  • 8.8% of Coca-Cola, 
  • 5.5% of IBM and 
  • 7.6% of Wells Fargo. 
  • (We also, of course, have many smaller, but important, positions.)


Comment:  "Buying wonderful company at fair price" and "holding period is forever".   This is classically Buffett's style.


We view these holdings as partnership interests in wonderful businesses, not as marketable securities to be bought or sold based on their near-term prospects. Our share of their earnings, however, are far from fully reflected in our earnings; only the dividends we receive from these businesses show up in our financial reports. Over time, though, the undistributed earnings of these companies that are attributable to our ownership are of huge importance to us. That’s because they will be used in a variety of ways to increase future earnings and dividends of the investee. They may also be devoted to stock repurchases, which will increase our share of the company’s future earnings.

Comment:  Buffett buys and holds for the long term.  He keeps these companies for their long-term prospects, knowing that he will obtain good returns from these companies, either through the dividends they distribute or through the undistributed growing earnings attributable to the owners from its reinvested retained earnings.


-  Had we owned our present positions throughout last year, our dividends from the “Big Four” would have been $862 million. That’s all that would have been reported in Berkshire’s income statement. Our share of this quartet’s earnings, however, would have been far greater: $3.3 billion. Charlie and I believe that the $2.4 billion that goes unreported on our books creates at least that amount of value for Berkshire as it fuels earnings gains in future years. We expect the combined earnings of the four – and their dividends as well – to increase in 2012 and, for that matter, almost every year for a long time to come. A decade from now, our current holdings of the four companies might well account for earnings of $7 billion, of which $2 billion in dividends would come to us.


Comment:  Only the dividends received are reported in Berkshire Hathaways account.  This is only a fraction (36%) of the actual earnings of $3.3 billion.  Buffett opines that these dividends will continue to grow as the retained earnings fuel earnings gains in future years.  I like the way Buffett projects the future earnings of these companies.

  • For present earnings of $3 billion to grow to $7 billion in 10 years, he is projecting a CAG of 8.84%.  
  • Projecting the dividends of $862 million growing to $2 billion in a decade is the equivalent of the dividends growing at a CAG of  8.77% for the same period.  
  • The growth rates used in his projections are very conservative (8.84% and 8.77%).  Maybe Buffett just uses his simple rule of thumb of doubling the earnings or dividends every 10 years.
  • Once again, he reiterates that $1 retained earnings by the company should deliver at least $1 value to the shareholder.

Sunday 26 February 2012

COMPOUNDING EFFECT OF GROWTH



Regular growth in earnings per share can have a compound effect if all, or substantially all, of the profits are retained. 

A company, for example, with earnings per share of 40 cents growing regularly 9 % would, in ten years produce earnings per share of 87 cents.

Of course, if the investor can do better with retained earnings than the company can, his or her interests are better served by a full distribution of profits.

Saturday 25 February 2012

Warren Buffett's Test for Retained Earnings


WARREN BUFFETT’S TEST FOR RETAINED EARNINGS

The test for Warren Buffett is whether company management can transform each dollar of earnings retained into no less than a dollar of market value. The period he implies that he uses is 5 years (on a rolling basis).

Using the retained earnings profitably is not enough for Warren Buffett. The retained earnings must increase earnings substantially. After all, just leaving the earnings in a savings account will increase earnings without any effort.

Warren Buffett has suggested to investors that they need to predict, after reasoned analysis, what rate of return a company will average over the near future. The rest is simple.

‘You should wish your earnings to be re-invested [by the company] if they can be expected to earn high returns, and you should wish them paid to you if low returns are the likely outcome of re-investment.’

AN ALTERNATE TEST FOR WARREN BUFFETT?


Mary Buffett and David Clark see Warren Buffett’s test from an additional perspective. They take the total value of the profits retained and use them to calculate the rate at which profits have increased by the use of that money.


Take for example, Canon Inc. Using figures available from Value Line, we can calculate that, in the period from 1993 to 2002, 
  • Alcoa earned a total of $9.56 per share. It paid a total of $ 1.55 to shareholders by way of dividends. 
  • This means it retained profits over that period amounting to $8.01.
  • In that period, earnings per share grew from .24 to 1.79. 
  • That is, all the profits retained by the company ($8.01 per share) resulted in the earnings per share rising 1.55 (1.79-.24). 
  • To show the return percentage, the calculation is

1.55 x 100 = 19.35
          8.01

A return of 19.35% would be acceptable to most investors but, in the end, shareholders would have to consider whether, had they received all the profits by way of dividends, they could have put the money to better use.

It is this ability to use retained earnings of a company to increase earnings at a higher than market rate that attracts successful investors like Warren Buffett.
  StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter

Wise Use of Retained Earnings


SPLITTING COMPANY PROFITS

When a corporation makes a profit, it can spend that profit in two ways:
a) return the profits to stockholders by way of dividends, share buy-backs or bonus issues;
b) use the money to increase the profitability of the company

For example, a company makes a profit of $100. 
  • It can pay this entire amount to stockholders who can then use that money as they think fit – spend on consumer items, make further investments, whatever. 
  • Or the company can use all that profit to invest in the business with a view to increasing profits in future years. 
  • Or the company can do a bit of both.


WISE USE OF RETAINED EARNINGS INTERESTS WARREN BUFFETT

To Warren Buffett, the ability to use retained earnings wisely is a sign of good company management. If the company management cannot do any better with earnings than he can, then he is better off if the company pays him the full amount in dividends.

Warren Buffett on Retained Earnings: For every dollar retained, at least one dollar of market value will be created for owners over 5 years.


WARREN BUFFETT ON RETAINED EARNINGS

In 1984, Warren Buffett made these comments:
‘Unrestricted earnings should be retained only where there is a reasonable prospect – backed preferably by historical evidence or, when appropriate by a thoughtful analysis of the future – that for every dollar retained by the corporation, at least one dollar of market value will be created for owners. This will happen only if the capital retained produces incremental earnings equal to, or above, those generally available to investors.’

WARREN BUFFETT’S TEST FOR RETAINED EARNINGS

The test for Warren Buffett is whether company management can transform each dollar of earnings retained into no less than a dollar of market value. The period he implies that he uses is 5 years (on a rolling basis).

Using the retained earnings profitably is not enough for Warren Buffett. 
  • The retained earnings must increase earnings substantially. 
  • After all, just leaving the earnings in a savings account will increase earnings without any effort.


Warren Buffett has suggested to investors that they need to predict, after reasoned analysis, what rate of return a company will average over the near future. The rest is simple.

‘You should wish your earnings to be re-invested [by the company] if they can be expected to earn high returns, and you should wish them paid to you if low returns are the likely outcome of re-investment.’

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY AND RETAINED EARNINGS


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY AND RETAINED EARNINGS

Berkshire Hathaway does not, following Buffett’s mantra, pay dividends to its shareholders and this is one reason why its compound return over the years of Buffett-Munger management has been so high.

  • The downside of course is that shareholders have not received dividends, meaning, that if they were dependent on money coming in at a given time, their only recourse, in relation to their shareholding, would be to sell the shares or borrow against them.
  • Having regard to the huge price of a single share over the past few years, this meant that investors may have had to either keep all their shareholding or dispose of it, not always the choice they wanted. Berkshire Hathaway partly catered for this dilemma by introducing B shares, which are in essence a fractional unit of the normal shares.

A POWERFUL FORCE

When asked to nominate the most powerful force on earth, Albert Einstein is reputed to have answered ‘compound interest’. Buffett might well agree.

Compounding and Retained Earnings

Warren Buffet is said to look at the compounding factor when deciding on investments, requiring a stock investment to show a high probability of compound growth in earnings of at least 10 per cent before making an investment decision.

Warren Buffett has on several occasions referred to the use by a company of its retained earnings as a test of company management.
  • He tells us that, if a company can earn more money on retained earnings than the shareholder can, the shareholder is better off (taxation aside) if the company retains profits and does not pay them out in dividends. 
  • If the shareholder can achieve a higher rate of return than the company, the shareholder would be better off if the company paid out all its profits in dividends (taxation situation again excluded) so that they could use the money themselves.

Put simply, 
  • if a company can retain earnings to grow shareholder wealth at better than the market rates available to shareholders, it should do so. 
  • If it can’t, it should pay the earnings to shareholders and let them do with them what they wish.

Sunday 5 February 2012

Retained Earnings are central to the process of investment growth

A company adds up its income, subtracts its expenses, and pays any dividends due; what is left becomes retained earnings.  These are undistributed profits.

Undistributed profits or retained earnings are central to the process of investment growth.

The net worth of the company builds up through the reinvestment of undistributed earnings.

Corporate raiders in particular love to find a company with a lot of cash reserves accumulated from retained earnings.

There is a legitimate dispute over how much retained earnings are adequate, and at what level a company should let loose of some cash and distribute it to shareholders.

Overall, retained earnings like the payment of dividends, deliver a powerful message:  the company generates more cash than it needs for the operation of the business.

That's exactly what a good investment should do.  

These earnings, over and above total expenses and taxes, drive the share price higher.

Common stocks have one important investment characteristic and one important speculative characteristic.  
  • Their investment value and average market price tend to increase irregularly but persistently over the decades, as their net worth builds up through the reinvestment of undistributed earnings.
  • The speculative feature is no mystery.  It is the tendency toward excessive and irrational price fluctuations as investors (in Graham's words) "give way to hope, fear, and greed."

Divine Dividends

Dividends represent nothing more than the investor's share of earnings that will be received immediately (rather than through reinvestment and future growth of the stock).

Dividends are one of the quickest and healthiest ways that earnings can make their way into shareholders' pockets.

Graham argued that intelligent investors would rather have dividends in their pockets (even if investors use them to buy more of the same stock) than risk waiting for possible future growth.  Furthermore, he insisted, it is management's responsibility to pay dividends.

For long-term investors who follow a "buy and hold" strategy, dividends are the only way to collect on investment gains.

In addition to representing money in the bank, dividends are, to many investors, a reliable indicator of future growth.  

Values are determined roughly by earnings available for dividends.  This relation among earnings, dividends and values survives.

A long history of dividend payments and regular dividend increases also indicates a substantial company with limited risk.  

Additionally, a rise in the dividend is tangible confirmation of the confidence of management in good times ahead.  A cut in the dividend is a red flag indicating trouble on the track.

Not all corporate income need be paid in dividends.  Depending on the industry and how much capital is required to keep the business growing, the appropriate payout may be as much as 80% or as little as 50% of net earnings.  

When studying the dividend payout of a company, calculate both average earnings and average dividends over a 10-year period.  From those two averages you can determine the average payout.  

Earnings fluctuate, but dividends tend to remain stable or,  in the best companies, to rise gradually.


One way of determining if a stock is overvalued or undervalued is to compare its dividend yield with that of similar companies.
  • Safety, growth, and other factors being equal, the stock with the highest dividend and the lowest share price is the best bargain.
  • As a further check of value, investors should compare the stock's dividend yield with that of the whole stock market dividend yield.


    Rationale for Withholding Dividends

    If a company isn't paying dividends it should, like Berkshire Hathaway, be doing something profitable with its earnings.  

    It is acceptable to withhold dividends for the following reasons:
    • To strengthen the company's working capital
    • To increase productive capacity
    • To reduce debt.
    Graham contended that when corporate management is stingy with dividends or withholds them altogether, it is sometimes for self-serving reasons.  It is easier to keep the cash on hand to bail management out of bad times or bad decisions.  Sometimes the dividend policy is simply a reflection of the tax status of management and large investors - they don't want the addition to their current taxable income.  Consequently, other investors get no income.




    Dividends in Jeopardy

    Dividends may be put in jeopardy in two ways:
    • When a company's earnings per share is less than its dividend per share
    • When debt is excessive.
    A company's average earnings (over several years) should be sufficient to cover its average dividend.  Though earnings per share can fall below dividend per share from time to time with reserves making up the difference, the condition can persist for only so long.  

    A company with substantial earnings rarely becomes insolvent because of bank loans.  But when a company is under pressure, lenders may require a suspension of dividends as a form of financial discipline.

    Companies amassing huge cash reserves should use these intelligently

    Companies with large cash reserves can use these for the direct benefit of their shareholders by giving dividends or can deploy these to grow their businesses in the future.

    Benjamin Graham was critical of amassing huge cash reserves within a business unless the company had a genuine future use for the funds.  

    A certain calculable amount of reserves are necessary to:

    • finance growth, 
    • guard against bad luck or down cycles, 
    • cover the settlement of a lawsuit, or 
    • eventually replace some important asset. 
    Graham argued, there is a limit to that need.  

    The purpose of business is to earn profits for its owners.  Owners are entitled to access to profits.  

    If earnings are retained, Graham persisted in his argument, they had better be used intelligently.

    Graham contended that when corporate management is stingy with dividends or withholds them altogether, it is sometimes for self-serving reasons.  It is easier to keep the cash on hand to bail management out of bad times or bad decisions.  Sometimes the dividend policy is simply a reflection of the tax status of management and large investors - they don't want the addition to their current taxable income.  Consequently, other investors get no income.

    Probably the greatest retainer of earnings of all time is Berkshire Hathaway, which keeps and reinvests all its earnings.  Berkshire's 23% return on shareholder equity is almost double that of American industry, and Buffett says he will continue to hoard earnings so as long as a dollar of retained earnings translates to no less than a dollar of increased shareholder value.  In his case, investors are inclined to let him have his way.


    Comment:
    It is not uncommon to encounter a company with huge cash reserves in their businesses earning only  fixed deposit interest rates for many years.  Shareholders should play their active role as business owners through raising the relevant questions to the management in the annual general meeting, to use these cash reserves intelligently.

    In recent years, strong cash reserves have provoked takeover bids from corporate raiders.  Are they liberators of cash for shareholders or are they destroyers of business, interested only in their own personal enrichment?  These raiders often planned to use cash reserves to help finance their purchase, a tactic that often sucks the strength from a company.  The management may defend the cash reserve was needed for various reasons, for example, the company needed the cash to cover the next down cycle of the manufacturing business.  Corporate raiders love to find and are attracted to a company with huge cash reserves.